Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- DC imotor ihas ihigh idynamic iperformance, ispeed ior itorque icontrol iof iinduction imotors iis imore
ibecame iachievable ifrom iinduction imotors iwith ithe iarduous ithan iDC imotors idue ito itheir inonlinear iand
iadvances iin ipower isemiconductors, idigital isignal icomplex istructure. iThe itorque iof ithe iDC imotors ican
iprocessors iand idevelopment iin icontrol itechniques. ibe isuperintended iby itwo iindependent iorthogonal
iBy iusing ivector icontrol, itorque iand iflux iof ithe ivariables, istator icurrent iand irotor iflux, iwhere isuch ia
iinduction imotors ican ibe icontrolled iindependently ias idecoupling idoes inot iexist iin iinduction imotors.
iin iDC imotors. iThe icontrol iperformance iof ifield
ioriented iinduction imotor idrive igreatly idepends ion The icontrol iof iAC imachine iis iessentially
ithe istator iflux iestimation. iIn ithis iproject ifield iclassified iinto iscalar iand ivector icontrol. iThe iscalar
ioriented icontrol i(Vector icontrol) imodel iis iusing icontrols iare ieasy ito iimplement ithough ithe idynamics
idifferent itypes iof ipulse iwidth imodulation i(PWM) iare isluggish. The iobjective iof vector icontrol iis ito
itechnique. iPWM itechniques iare ispace ivector ipulse iachieve ia isimilar itype iof icontroller iwith ian iinner
iwidth imodulation i(SVPWM), isine ipulse iwidth itorque icontrol iloop iwhich imakes ithe imotor irespond
imodulation i(SPWM) iand icurrent icontroller. iIn ivery ifast ito ithe itorque idemands ifrom ithe iouter ispeed
ithese iPWM itechniques iSVPWM iis ibetter ithan icontrol iloop. iIn ivector icontrol, ithe iprinciple iof
iSPWM iand icurrent icontroller, ibecause iit ihas iless idecoupled itorque iand iflux icontrol iare iapplied iand iit
itotal iharmonic idistortion i(THD) iand ibetter irelies ion ithe iinstantaneous icontrol iof istator icurrent
ielectromagnetic itorque i(Te). iThis iproject iis ialso ispace ivectors. Control iof iinduction imotor iis icomplicated
iconsidered iabout ioptimization itechnique ifor idue ito ithe icontrol iof idecoupled itorque iand iflux
iminimize ithe ipower iloss iin iinduction imotor. iThe iproducing icomponents iof ithe istator iphase icurrents.
isimulation iis idone iby iusing iMATLAB/SIMULINK There iis ino idirect iingress ito ithe irotor iquantities isuch as
iR2017a isoftware. iHardware iis iplanned ito irotor ifluxes iand icurrents. To iovercome ithese idifficulties,
iimplement iusing iTMS320F28335 ias idigital isignal ihigh iperformance ivector icontrol ialgorithms iare
iprocessor. ideveloped iwhich ican idecouple ithe istator iphase icurrents
by iusing ionly ithe imeasured istator icurrent, iflux iand
Keywords:- Vector Control; IPWM Techniques; Power irotor ispeed ifollow.
Loss; Optimization; Effienciency.
“Field iOriented iControl ihas ibeen iuniquely
I. INTRODUCTION I ielaborated ifor ihigh-performance imotor iapplications
iwhich ican iemploy ismoothly iover ithe iwide ispeed irange,
Variable ispeed idrive isystems iare ibasically iin imany ican ifabricate ifull itorque iat izero ispeed, iand iis iskilled
iindustrial iapplications.iDC imotors iwere iused imassively iof iquick iacceleration iand ideceleration."
iinithis iareas iwhere ivariable ispeed ioperation iwas
ielaborated, isince itheir iflux iand itorque icould ibe A. Principal iof iField iOriented iControl
imanaged ieasily iby ithe ifield iand iarmature icurrent. iDC The iprinciple iof iFOC isystem iof ian iinduction
imotors ihave icertain idisadvantages, iwhich iare idue ito imotor iis ithat ithe id-q icoordinate ireference iframe iis
ithe ipresence iof ithe icommutator iand ithe ibrushes. iThat ilocked ito ithe irotor iflux ivector, ithis iresults iin
iis, ithey ineed iperiodic imaintenance; ithey icannot ibe idecoupling iof ithe ivariables iso ithat iflux iand itorque ican
iused iin iflammable ior icorrosive ienvironments iand ithey ibe iindividually icontrolled iby istator idirect iaxis icurrent
ihave ilimited icommutator ipotential iunder ihigh ispeed, iisd iand iquadrature iaxis icurrent iisq irespectively ilike iin
ihigh ivoltage ioperational iconditions. iThese icomplications ithe iseparately iexcited iDC imachine. iPerformance iof iDC
ican ibe iovercome iby ithe iapplication iof ialternating imachine ican ialso ibe iexpanded ito ian iinduction imotor iif
icurrent imotors, iwhich ican ihave isimple iand irugged ithe imachine iis iappraised iin ia isynchronously irotating
istructure, ihigh imaintainability iand ieconomy; ithey iare ireference iframe iwhere ithe isinusoidal ivariables iappears
ialso irobust iand iimmune ito iheavy ioverloading. i iThese ias iDC iquantity iin isteady istate. iThe iinduction imotor
iadvantages ihave irecently imade iinduction imachines iwith ithe iinverter iand ivector icontrol iin ithe ifront iend iis
imostly iused iin iindustrial iapplications. iHowever, ithe ishown iin iFigure i(1).
B. Clarke iTransformation But ithese itwo iphase i(α, iβ) icurrents istill idepends iupon
Three-phase iquantities ieither ivoltages ior icurrents, itime iand ispeed.
ivarying iin itime ialong ithe iaxes ia, ib, iand ic ican ibe
imathematically itransformed iinto itwo-phase ivoltages ior C. Park iTransformation
icurrents, ivarying iin itime ialong ithe iaxes iα iand iβ iby This iis ithe imost iimportant itransformation iin ithe
ithe ifollowing itransformation imatrix: iFOC. iIn ifact, ithis iprojection imodifies ithe itwo iphase
ifixed iorthogonal isystem i(α, iβ) iinto i(d, iq) irotating
1 −1⁄2 1⁄2 ireference isystem. iThe itransformation imatrix iis igiven
𝑖𝛼𝛽𝑜 = (2⁄3) ⌊ 0 √3⁄2 −√3⁄2⌋ ibelow:
1⁄2 1⁄2 1⁄2
2 cos 𝜃 cos(𝜃 − 2𝜋⁄3) cos(𝜃 + 2𝜋⁄3)
Assuming ithat ithe iaxis ia iand iα iare ialong isame 𝑖𝑑𝑞𝑜 = ( ) ⌊ sin 𝜃 sin(𝜃 − 2𝜋⁄3) sin(𝜃 + 2𝜋⁄3) ⌋
3
idirection iand iβ iis iorthogonal ito ithem, iwe ihave ithe 1/2 1/2 1/2
ifollowing ivector idiagram:
Where, iθ iis ithe iangle ibetween ithe irotating iand
ifixed icoordinate isystem. iThe itorque iand iflux
icomponents iof ithe icurrent ivector iare idetermined iby ithe
ifollowing iequations:
𝑙𝑚 𝑖𝑑𝑠
𝜑𝑟 =
1 + 𝜏𝑟 𝑠
E. ids* icalculation
The istator idirect-axis icurrent ireference iids* iis Figi3:--iVoltage iMode iControl
iobtained ifrom irotor iflux ireference iinput i[Ψr]*.
𝜑𝑟∗
∗
𝑖𝑑𝑠 = Two itypes iof iVoltage iMode iControl:
𝑙𝑚 Sinusoidal ipulse iwidth imodulation i(SPWM)
F. Θe icalculation Space iVector ipulse iwidth imodulation i(SVPWM)
The irotor iflux iposition iθe irequired ifor icoordinates
itransformation iis igenerated ifrom ithe irotor ispeed iωm Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation
iand islip ifrequency iωsl. The isinusoidal ipulse iwidth imodulation i(SPWM)
itechnique iis iused ito iproduce ithe isinusoidal iwaveform
𝜃𝑒 = ∫(𝜔𝑚 + 𝜔𝑠𝑙 ) iby ifiltering ian ioutput ipulse iwaveform iwith ivarying
iwidth. iA ibetter ifiltered isinusoidal ioutput iwaveform ican
ibe iobtained iby iusing ia ihigh iswitching ifrequency iand
The islip ifrequency iis icalculated ifrom ithe istator iby ivarying ithe iamplitude iand ifrequency iof ia ireference
ireference icurrent iiqs* iand ithe imotor iparameters. ior imodulating ivoltage. iIn iSPWM itechnique iit imaintains
∗
𝑙𝑚 𝑅𝑟 𝑖𝑞𝑠 ithe ipulses iin idifferent iwidths iinstead iof imaintaining iin
𝜔𝑠𝑙 =
𝑙𝑟 𝜑𝑟 iequal iwidths ias iin imulti ipulse iwidth imodulation iwhere
The iiqs* iand iids* icurrent ireferences iare iconverted ithe idistortion ifactor i(DF) iand ilowest iorder iharmonics
iinto iphase icurrent ireferences iia*, iib*, iic* ifor ithe i(LOH) iare isignificantly ireduced. ithe icontrol isignal
icurrent iregulators. iThe iregulators iprocess ithe imeasured igenerator ifor iSPWM. iIn ithis iwe iuse itriangular iwave
iand ireference icurrents ito iproduce ithe iinverter igating ias icarrier isignal iand isine iwave ias ia ireference isignal
isignals. iand icompare ithe itwo iwaveforms iwith ithe ihelp iof
icomparator.
II. DIFFERENT IPWM ITECHNIQUES
1) Using iCurrent iController iPWM iTechniques Figi13:-iUsing iSinusoidal iPWM iSimulation iResults
i(a)Iabc i(b)Nrpm i(c)Te i(d) iVDC
Fig i14:- (a) iIas i(b) iNrpm i(c) iTe i(d) iVDC
VI. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES