Sunteți pe pagina 1din 76

CHAPTER 1

The Problem

Background of the study

Minor curfews are local ordinances proscribing

minors, generally within a specified age range, from

occupying public areas and streets during particular

times. It is enacted by a local or state government that

restricts certain people from being in public places at

specified times of the day. Many cities and towns have a

curfew law in place to prevent teenagers from being out

at certain times, typically spanning the late hours of

the night or school hours during the day. Any teenager

caught out after curfew can face a fine or even jail

time, depending upon the specific laws of the town.

(Kline, 2011)

Youth crime is a major and growing problem, often

involving both drugs and violence. Imposing youth

curfews can help to solve these problems, as they keep

young people off the street, and therefore out of

trouble, and prevent them from congregating in the hours

of darkness. (Kline, 2011)

1
The use of curfews on minors can help to protect

vulnerable children for not all parents are responsible

and inevitably their children suffer, both from crime

and in accidents, and are likely to fall into bad

habits. Society should ensure that such neglected

children are returned home safely and that their parents

are made to face up to their families. (Kline, 2011)

Juvenile curfews laws have appealed to liberals and

conservatives alike, though usually for slightly

different reasons. For conservatives, curfews fit into

an approach of more vigorous enforcement efforts, more

punitive sentencing, and increased social controls. For

liberals, curfews fit into the program of identifying

juveniles in early stages of delinquency who could

benefit from intervention strategies (Adams, 2003).

Additionally, the costs of enforcing curfews are

perceived as relatively low and the measures perceived

as very effective (Adams, 2003).

Too Little empirical research has been done on the

cost-effectiveness of curfew enforcement (Adams, 2003),

so this remains an area where further research would be

useful.

2
Delinquency prevention efforts are considered by

many to be crucial to the development of a consistent

and comprehensive approach to the problem of youth crime

and delinquency. Traditionally, evaluations have lacked

empirical support prevention programs’ impact on

juvenile misconduct. Today, however, a growing body of

research supports the idea of delinquency prevention as

both a practical and cost-effective means of reducing

youth misbehavior. In the conduct of preventing and or

controlling delinquency one of the means being applied

is the implementation of curfew hours (Brannen, 2002).

The Council for Protection for Youth and Children

was also asked to review the ordinance.

Recent deliberation focused on whether there is a need

to adjust the curfew hours since some students might

have to do some assignments and other school works which

could go beyond the 7 p.m. curfew. (Asuncion, 2016)

Section 2 of Ordinance 50, s. 2009 states that

children below 16 years old are prohibited from roaming

or playing in the streets, roads, plazas, parks, or

other public places from 7 p.m. to 5 a.m. Another

concern is the protocol on the custody of offenders. The

city government has been updating the Curfew Ordinance

3
to address delinquency, teenage gang violence, and other

violations committed at nighttime. (Asuncion, 2016)

Under the ordinance, violators will be penalized as

follows: first offense – the child shall be referred to

the guidance counselor of the Council for the Protection

of Youth and Children; second offense – the child shall

undergo counseling by the CSWDO; and third offense – the

child shall be put by the CSWDO under an intervention

program, which may include community service. (Asuncion,

2016)

The CSWDO shall ensure that the community service

is appropriate to the child and is consistent with the

goals of the intervention program. Adults who are the

guardian, parent, or authorized custodian of the

offending child within the third degree of relationship,

either by consanguinity or affinity, shall be penalized

under other applicable laws and ordinances. (Asuncion,

2016)

The Sangguniang Bayan of La Trinidad on March 4,

2008 amended section 15 of Ordinance No. 1-2003 or the

Curfew for Minors under the Children Welfare Code

changing mainly the time schedule and the penalties

which then now referred to as the Ordinance No. 2- 2008.

4
Section 15 of Ordinance No.2 of 2008 states that “No

person below eighteen years old shall loiter in the

streets or public places between Seven O’clock in the

evening (7:00 pm) to Five O’clock in the morning (5:00

am), except those returning to or going out of their

houses or schools for legitimate purposes or unless they

are in company with their parents and guardians. Minors

who shall be caught will be referred to the Municipal

Social Welfare and Development Office (MSWDO) for

guidance and counseling, safekeeping for the night, and

disposition in accordance to the provisions of RA 9344.

The said ordinance is a revised edition of Ordinance

no.1-2003, section 15 which states that “No person below

eighteen years shall loiter in the streets or public

places between 10:30 at Night. According to La Trinidad

vice mayor Romeo Salda Sr., the ordinance was revised to

match with Baguio City who earlier revised the same

ordinance in their locality. Reports said the senior

citizens federation asked municipalities in Benguet to

strictly impose the curfew for minors, in order to shun

them away from committing or becoming victims of crimes

(Balangen, 2011).

5
Curfews are credited by some with restoring and

maintaining order in lower crime neighborhoods,

according to the analysis. In addition to equipping law

enforcement with tools to keep youth off the streets,

curfews provide parents with a legitimate, legal basis

for restricting the activities of their children. It is

easier for parents to place boundaries on their

children's activities, proponents argue, when other

youth in the neighborhood are similarly restricted by a

specific time to return home. Nonetheless, there are

still weaknesses and problems it its implementation.

(Ruefle and Reynolds, 1996)

Hence, it also expected that there are weaknesses

and problems in the implementation of curfew on minors

in La Trinidad, Benguet.

This study was carried out in La Trinidad, Benguet

to assess the implementation of curfew on minors and

provide recommendations in order to address and improve

these weaknesses and problems.

Statement of the Problem

The main purpose of the study was to assess the

operation of curfew on minors in La Trinidad, Benguet.

Specifically, it sought answers to the following:

6
1. What is the level of attainment of the

objectives of curfew on minors?

2.1 Are there significant differences on the

level of attainment of the objectives of curfew on

minors as perceived by the respondents?

2. What is the level of implementation of curfew on

minor?

2.1 Are there significant differences on the

level of implementation of curfew on minors as perceived

by the respondents?

3. What is the degree of seriousness of problems

encountered in the implementation of curfew hours?

Hypotheses of the Study

1. There are significant differences in the level

of attainment of the objectives of curfew on minors as

perceived by the groups of respondents.

2. There are significant differences in the level

of implementation of curfew on minors as perceived by

the groups of respondents.

Importance of the Study

This result of the study will benefit the police

officers, barangay officials, municipality of La

Trinidad, future researchers and the researcher himself.

7
For the Police officers, the result of the study

will help them to upgrade and enhance its capabilities

of implementing the PNP Strategic Action Plan in La

Trinidad, Benguet.

For the municipality of La Trinidad, the result of

the study will be one of the sources for making this

town a better place.

For the respondents, the outcome of the study would

serve as tools that will assist them to improve their

current techniques through the provision of significant

data imparted by the study.

For the future researchers, the result of this

study would help future researchers who would like to

conduct a similar study.

Finally, on the part of the researcher, during and

after the phase of the study, the researcher who is

currently teaching Criminology subjects will also be

benefitted. He would gain essential knowledge about

research and the implementation of curfew on minors

which is very relevant in his job.

Scope and Delimitation of the Study

This study is focused on the assessment on the

ordinance of curfew on Minors in La Trinidad, Benguet.

8
The researcher confined his study at Barangay Balili,

Betag, Cruz, Poblacion, Puguis, wangal and Pico La

Trinidad Benguet. This study covered the perceptions of

Philippine National Police personnel, Barangay officials

and parents in the implementation of curfew for minors

in La Trinidad, Benguet.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework

The researcher was guided by the concept that if

curfew is imposed on minors, they can be prevented from

engaging crimes in the future.

Curfews are built upon the idea that “restricting

the hours when young people may be in public should

limit their opportunities to commit crimes or become

victims” (McDowall, 2000, p. 59). With this underlying

motivation, such policies can take a variety of forms,

including variations in targeted age groups, hours of

operation, exceptions to the policy, and sanctions for

violations (e.g., Ford, 1994, p.1679; Ruefle & Reynolds,

1995).

Typical curfew policies in larger cities are

directed at youth aged up to 17, and enforced between

the hours of 10:00PM – midnight and 4:00 – 6:00 in the

morning (McDowall, 2000). Thus, it is generally believed

9
that juvenile curfew policies encompass a variety of

restricted activities and sanctions, implemented with

the intention of controlling delinquency and increasing

public safety.

Given that curfew laws reduce the amount of time

that teenagers spend out of their homes, curfew laws

have been marketed to have the strong potential to limit

both the rate of crimes, such as homicide both committed

by and inflicted on teenagers (McDowall, Loftin, &

Wiersema, 2000). It has also been proposed that curfew

laws have the potential to strengthen parental control

by making it easier for parents to limit the amount of

time that their children are allowed to spend out of the

house (McDowall et al., 2000).

In the Philippines, the Department of Justice

Undersecretary Merceditas Gutierrez said times have

become especially dangerous due to the proliferation of

illegal drugs. Even the most remote barangays have been

penetrated by drug dealers and pushers, according to

police and military reports (Calica 2003).

"The curfew will help in protecting the minors

because most crimes happen at night. I’m sure parents

will support that. I personally do not want young people

10
roaming around the streets when it’s already late. We

can no longer be certain of their safety because of

illegal drugs," Gutierrez said. There have been debates

about the measure but Gutierrez pointed out the public

should only be assured of a proper manner of

apprehending minors violating the curfew. She said the

government can always quell abuses in imposing rules and

regulations and thus fears of stepping on the right of

minors can be addressed by a campaign on the advantages

of a curfew.

Interior and Local Government Secretary Jose Lina

Jr. has likewise backed the plan to implement curfew

hours for minors in Metro Manila and the rest of the

country, saying the scheme would greatly reduce

incidents of street crimes.

Lina urged city and municipal mayors to seriously

consider imposing curfew in their respective localities

to prevent criminal elements from plying their illegal

activities at night.

In calling all city and municipal mayors outside

Metro Manila to impose their respective curfew hours for

minors, Lina said this could be done through an

ordinance passed by their respective local councils.

11
"There is great wisdom in the imposition of curfew

not only in Metro Manila but also nationwide as this

would greatly help the police in stopping the growing

number of street crimes, but this should be imposed only

on minors," Lina said.

Preventive enforcement falls under the heading of

protection, and involves the prevention of crime through

the noticeable presence of police vehicle and personnel.

Prevention of crime is the soundest of all

criminological philosophy. It is much easier to patch a

crack in the dike than it is to repair the wall after it

has broken. The old saw about “an ounce of prevention

being a worth a pound of cure” could not find a better

example than in the prevention of crime. The ultimate

goal of crime prevention is to reduce the risk of being

a victim. In order to accomplish this effectively, it is

important to remove opportunities for a criminal to take

advantage of you or your property. You are attempting to

prevent either victimization or criminalization by

presenting an unattractive target to the criminal. This

effort at removing opportunities is often referred to as

target hardening. Target hardening can be as complex as

installing a high tech alarm system or taking a self-

12
defense course to something as simple as locking your

door. Successful crime prevention efforts will promote a

safer community be enhancing the perception of safety

and the attitudes and behaviors that help people feel

safe. (Payton, 1971).

Crime prevention is the attempt to reduce

victimization and to deter crime and criminals. It is

applied specifically to efforts made by governments to

reduce crime, enforce the law, and maintain criminal

justice. Crime prevention is any initiative or policy

which reduces or eliminates the aggregate level of

victimization or the risk of individual criminal

participation. It includes government and community

based programs to reduce the incidents of risk factors

correlated with criminal participation and the rage of

victimization, as well as efforts to change perceptions.

One of the priority goals of the government is to

establish a harmonious, peaceful, and stable environment

conducive to attain over-all development here in our

county. For one, the impact of a sound and healthy

environment greatly affects the welfare of every

individual and the overall status of the economy in the

nation (Southern Illinois University, 2006).

13
Crime is a social disease that needs to be cured. A

conceptual framework or model for the purpose of crime

prevention is therefore needed. Having the knowledge on

the etiology of crime, all possible preventive and

suppressive method in combating crime can help deter

criminality (Manwong and Delizo, 2006).

In his article in “Ang Tala” on August 15 1978,

quoted that during the fifth United Nation Congress on

Prevention of Crimes and Treatment of Offenders held in

Geneva, Switzerland on September 1 -12, 1975, it was the

consensus of the participating nations to stress the

importance of “community prevention action” which

embraces a program of action planned and implemented at

both the local and national levels. Under these concepts

public participation was understood to encompass all the

ways in which a community group assist in the prevention

and control of crime and promote peace and order.

(Ramos, 1975)

It is believed that an effective criminal justice

system call for the rationalization and socialization of

crime prevention policy and integrating them into

national development goals, for it has been pointed out

that most of the weaknesses of the system are traceable

14
to the failure of authorities to bridge the gap between

crime and social development. (Ramos, 1975)

The conceptual framework of the study was based on

the concepts of crime prevention, adhering to the

archaic saying stating that: “An ounce of prevention is

worth a pound of crime. Much of the anguish, losses and

damage caused by crime can be simply avoided by

preventing its source” (Tradio,1994).

It is one of the fundamental duties of the elected

officials to see to it that the society in their

jurisdiction should be a place conducive to stay, which

means peaceful society. So it is one duty of the elected

official to make and enact laws which help prevent the

commission of crimes so as to maintain peace and order

in their respective jurisdiction, one of which is the

implementation of curfew for minors in La Trinidad,

Benguet.

This study aimed to determine the level of

attainment of the objectives of curfew for minors, level

of implementation of curfew for minors and the degree of

seriousness in the implementation of curfew for minors

in the municipality of La Trinidad, Benguet. Thus, after

the root cause were properly identified, the necessary

15
measures were recommended and formulated to solve the

problems.

The paradigm of the study (figure 1) describes the

coverage and the direction of the study. Under the

independent variables, the following are determined. The

curfew operation on minors is dependent on the

assessment of the level of attainment of the objectives

of curfew on minors, the level of implementation of

curfew on minors and the problems encountered in the

implementation of curfew on minors. Differences in the

perceptions among PNP personnel, Barangay officials and

parent may exists any may affect the result of

assessment.

16
INDEPENDENT VARIABLES DEPENDENT VARIABLE
1. Attainment of the 1. Level of
objectives of attainment of the
curfew on minors objectives of curfew
2. Implementation of on minors
curfew on minors
3. Degree of 2. Level of
seriousness of implementation of
problems curfew on minors
encountered in the
implementation of 3. Degree of
curfew on minors seriousness of
problems encountered
in the implementation
of curfew on minors

Moderator Variables

a. La Trinidad, PNP personnel

c. Barangay officials

d. Parents

Figure 1. Paradigm of the study

17
Definition of Terms

Minor. It refers to a juvenile who is under the

age of eighteen.

Curfew. It is an order or law that requires people

to be indoors after a certain time at night. It is the

period of time when such an order or law is in effect.

Barangay Tanod. It refers to a community brigade

composed of civilian volunteers duly appointed by the

Punong Barangay upon recommendation of the Barangay

Peace and Order Committee (BPOC).

Juvenile delinquency. It refers to the habitual

committing of criminal acts or offenses by a young

person, especially one below the age at which ordinary

criminal prosecution is possible.

Business Establishment. It refers to businesses

offering liquors or any intoxicating beverages, those

which offer amusement services such as billiards,

internet café and the like.

Patrol. This refers to an act done by police

personnel passing along a road, beat, etc., or around or

through a specified area in order to maintain order and

security.

18
CHAPTER 2

Design and Methodology

This section discussed the methods and procedures

used in this study. Specifically, it discusses the

research design, methodology, the population and locale

of the study, the data gathering tools and the treatment

of data.

Research Design

In this study, the descriptive survey method of

investigation was used in the presentation, analysis,

and interpretation of data. The descriptive method is

the collection, presentation, and description of data.

It described the curfew for minors in the Municipality

of La Trinidad, Benguet. Specifically, the study

described the level of implementation of curfew for

minors, the level of attainment of the objectives of

curfew for minors and the degree of seriousness of

problems encountered in the implementation of curfew for

minors in the municipality of La Trinidad, Benguet.

Locale and Population of the Study

This study was conducted to assess the Curfew on

Minors in the most urbanized Barangays in La Trinidad,

19
Benguet such as Betag, Balili, Pico, Puguis, Poblacion

and Cruz.

Population of the Study

The population of the study was comprised of the

members of the La Trinidad Police, Parents and Barangay

officials.

Table 1. Distribution of respondents


Area of Respondents Number of
respondents
________________________________________________________
___

PNP Personnel 22
Barangay Officials 45
Parents 85
________________________________________________________
___

Total 152

Data Gathering Tools

The study utilized the questionnaire-checklist with

Likert-type scale served as the main gathering tool. The

questionnaire was adopted from the unpublished Thesis

“Curfew for Minors in Bontoc, Mountain Province” by

20
Rommel Fedcha of University of Baguio. Thus, the

instrument is deemed valid and reliable.

Data Gathering Procedures

Prior to the gathering of data, the researcher

sought permission from the office of the Mayor, Chief of

Police, respective members of the PNP and Barangay

Chairman. The researcher and his enumerators personally

administered the questionnaires and gave an overview,

explain briefly the purpose and importance of the study

to the respondents.

After retrieving the questionnaires, the

responses were tallied, tabulated and treated

statistically.

Treatment of Data

Data collected were evaluated and measured to

ensure their completeness, consistency, accuracy and

relevance. This is to enable data gathered to be

presented into tables for qualitative explanations and

analysis of curfew on minors.

All data were statistically treated by using

the 4 point scale to quantify the responses.

21
The following scales were used on the level of

attainment of objectives of curfew on minors as

perceived by the respondents:

Score Numerical Descriptive


Symbols
Value Equivalent

4 3.25 – 4.00 Much Attained MA

3 2.50 - 3.24 Moderately


Attained MA

2 1.75 – 2.49 Slightly


Attained SA

1 1.00 – 1.74 Not Attained NA

On the determination of the level of

implementation of curfew on minors in La Trinidad,

Benguet as perceived by the respondents, the following

scales were used:

Score Numerical Descriptive


Symbols
Value Equivalent

4 3.25 – 4.00 Much Implemented MI

3 2.50 - 3.24 Moderately


Implemented MI

2 1.75 – 2.49 Slightly


Implemented SI

22
1 1.00 – 1.74 Not Implemented NI

On the determination of the degree of

seriousness of problems encountered in the

implementation of curfew on minors in La Trinidad,

Benguet as perceived by the respondents, the following

scales were used:

Score Numerical Descriptive


Symbols
Value Equivalent

4 3.25 – 4.00 Highly Serious HS

3 2.50 - 3.24 Moderately


Serious MS

2 1.75 – 2.49 Slightly


Serious SS

1 1.00 – 1.74 Not a Problem NaP

In answering specific problems 1, 2, and 3

weighted mean was used. The formula (Oasan, 1995) is

X = ∑fx
N

Where: X = weighted mean


∑ = summation
f = No. of respondents
X = scales
N = total number of respondents

23
Sub-problems 1.2, 2.1, and 3.1 were answered by ANOVA
(F-test) through Microsoft Excel Toolpak Analysis.

CHAPTER 3

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

This chapter presents and interprets the data

relative to the level of attainment of the objectives,

level of implementation and the degree of seriousness of

problems encountered in the implementation of curfew on

minors in the Municipality of La Trinidad.

The Level of Attainment of the objectives of curfew on

minors

Table 3 shows that the overall mean is 2.86,

which is interpreted as moderately attained. In the

overall analysis, the

24
Table 3. Level of Attainment of the objectives of curfew
for minors as perceived by the group
Descriptive
Indicators W.M Equivalent Rank
1. Preventing the minors
from drinking liquor by not
allowing them to enter
inside any amusement Moderately
establishment; 2.85 Attained 10
2. Arresting those persons
who are selling, using,
possessing, and
transporting dangerous Moderately
drugs; 2.91 Attained 7.5
3. Imposing fines to
business establishments
which permit minors to
drink inside their bar or Moderately
any amusement; 2.52 Attained 15
4. Closing business
establishments which
deliberately allows minors
to drink inside their bar, Slightly
despite of warnings given; 2.45 Attained 16
5. Preventing minors from
loitering during night Moderately
time; 2.75 Attained 13
6. Increasing police
visibility to prevent would
be minor violators to Moderately
commit crime; 2.95 Attained 5.5
7. Educating and or
informing the community on
the modus operandi (mode of
operation) of the minors in
committing crimes Moderately
particularly on robbery; 2.78 Attained 12
8. Safeguarding the people,
and preserving peace and
order in the community by
conducting patrol and
inspection in the Moderately
community; 3.24 Attained 1
9. Strictly implementing
curfew to protect the Moderately
minors from adults and 2.98 Attained 4

25
fellow minors;
10. Requiring minors to go
home earlier to avoid bad
influence from gang members Moderately
of the community; 3.04 Attained 3
11. Suppressing and or
abolishing any bad Moderately
fraternity or sorority; 2.88 Attained 9
12. Arresting gang members
who are bad influence to
the minors and giving them
proper counseling for them
to stop and be law-abiding Moderately
citizen; 2.71 Attained 14
13. Detaining minors who
violate curfew and
immediately informing the
parents then conducting
counseling before letting Moderately
them out; 2.81 Attained 11
14. Educating and informing
parents, guardians with
regard to supervision,
which helps them to be
responsible parent or Moderately
guardian; 3.05 Attained 2
15. Strengthening the
relationship between
enforcers and members of
the community, with regard
to counselling of minors; Moderately
and 2.95 Attained 5.5
16. Helping the economic
development of the Moderately
community. 2.91 Attained 7.5
Average 2.86 Moderately Attained

respondents perceived that many of the objectives are

still to be attained. This is due to unforeseen factors

that affects the attainment of the objectives like

occurrence of emergencies, special holidays and events

26
such as Adivay where attention of law enforcers are

diverted, and also some minors are not aware that there

is such curfew on minors in La Trinidad that’s why they

are loitering in public places.

Rank one is indicator 8 safeguarding the

people, and preserving peace and order in the community

by conducting patrol and inspection in the community

obtained the highest mean of 3.24, interpreted as

moderately attained. This means that majority of people

in the community feel that they are being protected by

authorities but there are still some who felt otherwise.

Result of the interview made by GreenGarage

says that having curfew means that those under 18 get as

much adult supervision as possible. This lessens the

chances of them getting involved in juvenile violence

and crime. Parents often feel assured and relieved

having their kids at home and not on the streets at a

certain time.

Driving and hanging out during late night hours puts

teenagers in a risky situation. Driving or traveling at

night poses greater dangers than traveling at daytime.

In addition, curfew keeps them away from temptations

27
such as drug use, violent acts, sexual risks, heavy

partying, and alcohol intake.

Palberas (2016) in a personal interview said

that “I can say that at least the law enforcers and

barangay officials are doing their job because once in a

while I can see them going around our community to

render service” (Personal Interview)

Second in rank is Educating and informing

parents, guardians with regard to supervision, which

helps them to be responsible parent or guardian garnered

the second highest mean of 3.05 interpreted as

moderately attained. This means that there is high

awareness on the part of the parents but the information

campaign is limited due to financial assistance and it

further implies that the implementers of the curfew for

minors were able to help many to be more responsible

parents.

Superintendent Leon Taleo of the Baguio City Police

Office (BCPO) operations division revealed that from

January to the middle of June this year, there were

around 225 minors who were rounded up and either given

counselling by social workers prior to the turnover to

28
their parents or were immediately fetched by their

parents at the city social welfare and development

office or at the BCPO women and children’s desk located

in Burnham Park.

Joseph Mangiben member of Barangay Tanod of Wangal

said that when minor is caught and brought to the

Barangay hall, some qualified Barangay officials and

Tanod are giving advice and guidance to the parents

which is good because not all parents are well educated

to manage children. (Personal Interview 2016)

Rank three is requiring minors to go home

earlier to avoid bad influence from gang members of the

community obtained the third highest mean of 3.04, which

is interpreted as moderately attained. This means that

majority of the minors were going home earlier because

they are required by the implementers of the curfew for

minors.

However, there are still minors who go home late because

they enjoy playing in the computer shops and parks.

Association of Private Schools president Ann Marie

Caguioa said since the passage of Ordinance 50, series

of 2009 prescribing the rules and regulations for curfew

29
for minors in the city, reported crimes against children

have been minimized and private and public schools had

been complying with the guidelines in the ordinance.

She further said that it is still best for the city

to maintain the 7 pm to 5 am curfew for minors in order

to make sure children will be home right after dismissal

of classes so that their parents will not always worry

about their safety.

During special occasions of schools, Caguioa

informed members of the City Council that schools comply

with the guidelines wherein they issue the concerned

children with a certification that there will be a

school-based activity that will end beyond 7 pm in order

to be used by the minors once apprehended or

investigated by the law enforcers, aside from their

respective identification cards and class schedules.

First lowest indicator is closing business

establishments which deliberately allows minors to drink

inside their bar, despite warnings given which obtained

a mean of 2.45, interpreted as slightly attained. The

result implies that very few business establishments

30
were closed in compliance with curfew on minors because

there is no enough man power to process legal documents

and work on technical areas to close a certain business.

This also happens due to poor cooperation of the owners

of the different business establishment.

In La Trinidad, Benguet, the Women and Children’s

Protection Desk (WCPD) recorded 112 cases of CICL in

2014 and 94 in 2015. Petty theft and physical injury

ranked the top most juvenile offenses. Petty thefts are

usually committed through snatching or pickpocketing of

valuables. Most were arrested for physical injury due to

their involvement in bars or street fights.

(Personal Interview 2016) P03 Ruben Balanoy said

that it is difficult for them to ensure that all

businesses will be closed as required by the Ordinance

because they cannot be in the same place all the time

since La Trinidad is a very wide place and PNP personnel

are not enough. When Police officers have move to other

place, business owners will open their business

establishment.

Second lowest indicator, is imposing fines to

business establishments which permit minors to drink

inside their bar or any amusement garnered a weighted

31
mean of 2.52 interpreted as moderately attained. It

implies that there are still policies which are not

clear and fully informed to the violators of the

ordinance. One of the reasons of this result is no clear

cut policy in imposing fines to business establishments

and the fines is not clearly identified in the

ordinance.

A business owner in Pico said that some of the

business owners are haggling and negotiating immediately

to the authorities whenever they violate a certain

ordinance particularly offering liquor to minors even it

is within curfew hours. Their defense is that they don’t

know that their customers are minors.

Another factor for the difficulty in imposing fines

is that some people do not agree with the ordinance, an

example for this is the petition letter submitted by the

members of the La Trinidad Bar and Restaurant Owners

Association Inc. they said that the early curfew is

laudable as it protects the welfare of minors, but it

will seriously affect thousands of individuals involved

in the business, as well as the income the town derives

from these establishments.

32
The third lowest indicator is arresting gang

members who are bad influence to the minors and giving

them proper counseling for them to stop and be law-

abiding citizen with a weighted mean of 2.71 interpreted

as moderately attained. This means that there are still

many minors loitering in public places even if it is

already within curfew hours.

The difficulty is that these activities are

historically part of the amenities of life as we have

known them. They are not mentioned in the Constitution

or in the Bill of Rights. These unwritten amenities have

been, in part, responsible for giving our people the

feeling of independence and self-confidence, the feeling

of creativity. These amenities have dignified the right

of dissent, and have honored the right to be

nonconformists and the right to defy submissiveness.

They have encouraged lives of high spirits, rather than

hushed, suffocating silence.

Difference in the level of attainment


of the objectives of curfew on
minors according to group

Table 2.1 presents the differences in the level of

attainment of the objectives of curfew for minors

according to group. As exhibited in the table, the PNP

33
and Barangay officials perceived higher level of

perception on the level of attainment of the objectives

of curfew for minors compared to Parents on the ground

that members of the PNP themselves and Barangay

officials are the prime enforcers of the ordinance. As

such they are much confident that they have done their

part particularly when it comes to the attainment of the

objectives of curfew. On the other hand, parents got the

lowest perception because many of them are focused on

their work making them unaware that law enforcers are

conducting patrol.

In relation to this, a resident of Puguis says that

seldom they see law enforcers conducting patrol in their

barangay. Fedcha (2011) asserted that the obvious reason

why the parents have a lower level of perception is on

the ground that they are only the recipients of these

services. Kiblasan (1999) stressed also that perceptions

differ especially if it is between doers and observers.

In his study, the BCPO personnel perceived that purposes

of the Anti-Vice Campaign were fully attained however

barangay officials perceived it as moderately attained

only.

Table 2.1 Differences in the level of attainment of the


objectives of curfew for minors according to group

34
Barangay PNP
Officials Personnel Parents
1. Preventing the minors from
drinking liquor by not allowing
them to enter inside any
amusement establishment; 3.43 2.70 2.55
2. Arresting those persons who
are selling, using, possessing,
and transporting dangerous
drugs; 3.49 2.57 2.70
3. Imposing fines to business
establishments which permit
minors to drink inside their bar
or any amusements; 3.17 2.00 2.32
4. Closing business
establishments which
deliberately allows minors to
drink inside their bar, despite 3.09 1.78 2.32
5. Preventing minors from
loitering during night time; 3.41 2.26 2.55
6. Increasing police visibility
to prevent would be minor
violators to commit crime; 3.63 3.09 2.50
7. Educating and or informing
the community on the modus
operandi (Mode of Operation) of
the minors in committing crimes
particularly on robbery; 3.44 3.35 2.25
8. Safeguarding the people, and
preserving peace and order in
the community by conducting
patrol and inspection in the
community; 3.86 3.43 2.77
9. Strictly implementing curfew
to protect the minors from
adults and fellow minors; 3.43 3.39 2.58
10. Requiring minors to go home
earlier to avoid bad influence
from gang members of the
community; 3.57 3.48 2.54
11. Suppressing and or
abolishing any bad fraternity or
sorority; 3.32 3.30 2.48
12. Arresting gang members who
are bad influence to the minors
and giving them proper 3.15 3.00 2.32

35
counseling for them to stop and
be law-abiding citizen;
13. Detaining minors who violate
curfew and immediately informing
the parents then conducting
counseling before letting them
out; 3.29 3.22 2.34
14. Educating and informing
parents, guardians with regard
to supervision, which helps them
to be responsible parent or
guardian; 3.47 3.41 2.64
15. Strengthening the
relationship between enforcers
and members of the community,
with regard to counselling of
minors; and 3.62 3.41 2.36
16. Helping the economic
development of the community. 3.43 3.26 2.42
Average 3.42 2.98 2.48
Fcomp= 29.559 p-value= 0.00 F.05= 3.204 significant

Statistical analysis shows that the p-value of 0.00

is less than the alpha value of 0.05 level of

significance which means that there are significant

differences in the level of attainment of the objectives

of curfew for minors according to group. Hence, there is

enough evidence to accept the hypothesis that there is

significant difference in the level of attainment of the

objectives of curfew on minors as perceived by the

groups of respondents.

This finding implies that perception of the

respondents vary because they have different level of

36
exposure and observation on level of attainment of

objectives.

Level of Implementation of curfew for Minors as


perceived by the group

Table 3 presents the level of implementation of curfew

on minors in La Trinidad, Benguet.

Table 3. Level of implementation of curfew on minors in


La Trinidad, Benguet as perceived by the respondents
Descriptive
Indicators W.M Equivalent Rank
1. Preventing the minors from
drinking liquor by no allowing
them to enter inside any Moderately
amusement establishment; 2.77 Implemented 10
2. Arresting those persons who
are selling, using, possessing,
and transporting dangerous Moderately
drugs; 2.73 Implemented 13
3. Imposing fines to business
establishments which permit
minors to drink inside their bar Slightly
or any amusements; 2.38 Implemented 15
4. Closing business
establishments which
deliberately allows minors to
drink inside their bar, despite Slightly
of warnings given; 2.37 Implemented 16
5. Preventing minors from Moderately
loitering during night time; 2.78 Implemented 11
6. Increasing police visibility
to prevent would be minor Moderately
violators to commit crime; 3.07 Implemented 1.5
7. Educating and or informing
the community on the modus
operandi (Mode of Operation) of
the minors in committing crimes Moderately
particularly on robbery; 2.89 Implemented 7

37
8. Safeguarding the people, and
preserving peace and order in
the community by conducting
patrol and inspection in the Moderately
community; 3.04 Implemented 4
9. Strictly implementing curfew
to protect the minors from Moderately
adults and fellow minors; 2.99 Implemented 5
10. Requiring minors to go home
earlier to avoid bad influence
from gang members of the Moderately
community; 3.07 Implemented 1.5
11. Suppressing and or
abolishing any bad fraternity or Moderately
sorority; 2.83 Implemented 9
12. Arresting gang members who
are bad influence to the minors
and giving them proper
counseling for them to stop and Moderately
be law-abiding citizen; 2.66 Implemented 14
13. Detaining minors who violate
curfew and immediately informing
the parents then conducting
counseling before letting them Moderately
out; 2.75 Implemented 12
14. Educating and informing
parents, guardians with regard
to supervision, which helps them
to be responsible parent or Moderately
guardian; 2.93 Implemented 6
15. Strengthening the
relationship between enforcers
and members of the community,
with regard to counselling of Moderately
minors; and 2.88 Implemented 8
16. Helping the economic Moderately
development of the community. 3.06 Implemented 3
Moderately
Average 2.83 Implemented

Based on the results, the respondents perceived

that the curfew on minors in La Trinidad, Benguet is

38
moderately implemented as reflected by the average mean

of 2.83.

This implies that the respondents perceived some

needed improvement in the implementation of the curfew

for minors such the strict imposition of fines and

immediate closures of business establishments violating

curfew on minors ordinance. The findings is attributed

to inevitable factors such a as lack of manpower,

insufficient budget and uncooperative parents.

This is supported by the research conducted by

Balangen (2011). In her research she said that though

most complied with the ordinance, the compliance was not

greatly influenced by the strategies applied by the

implementing group. Respondents’ top reason for their

compliance is parental guidance while influence of

friends was the most reason for the respondents’

noncompliance to the ordinance. Weak communication

strategies applied in the implementing of the ordinance

and not strict and inconsistent/irregular implementation

of the ordinance and the ronda system were the top

problems of the respondents regarding the ordinance

while the implementers faced problems such as

insufficient budget, lack of manpower, uncooperative

39
parents/guardians, non-compliance of business owners,

lack of discipline of minors and non-existent support

system of the government.

(Personal Interview 2016)SPO1 Chris Haidle

Tumingeb said that in his 14 years’ service going around

the country dealing with different kinds of people,

rules or laws cannot be 100 percent implemented because

of two factors one is that the implementers are just

human being where they usually give consideration to

those who are violating simples rules like curfew for

minors where there are no victims, second is that not

all people especially young people support this

particular ordinance for they believe it is violating

their rights to travel or to enjoy life.

The two indicators such as increasing police

visibility to prevent would be minor violators to commit

crime and requiring minors to go home earlier to avoid

bad influence from gang members of the community both

garnered a mean of 3.07 interpreted as moderately

attained. This implies that the respondents perceived

that implementers of curfew for minors are visible to

the public and that they are indeed requiring minors to

go home once they are caught loitering in public places.

40
The result is moderately attained is due to the limited

number of PNP personnel and Barangay officials.

This is supported by the study of Balangen (2011).

Her findings states that the ronda system was the actual

foot patrol of the barangay officials or barangay tanods

and police officers around the barangay to apprehend

violators. The ronda system included securing of

computer shops and establishments serving liquors around

the area while at the same time informing the residents

regarding the ordinances. Curfew for minors, computer

shops and liquor establishments were successive, thus,

the ronda system was not only for the latter but

extended to the other two ordinances. According to the

key informants, most of the minors were caught at the

computer shops and establishments serving alcoholic

beverages, and in dark areas. Thus, most of them

concentrated on these areas. Minors who shall be caught

by Barangay Tanods after 7PM should either be sent home

or referred to the police officers. The police officers

will either send the children home or refer them to the

MSWDO for guidance and counseling. The MSWDO then will

send the children home after the guidance and counseling

with the parents.

41
However, this procedure was modified by some of the

barangay officials where they apply case-to-case basis.

Barangay Kagawad and Chairman for Peace and Order of

Barangay Puguis Tyrone T. Diaz said that during foot

patrols, they exempted residents who loitered later than

7PM as long as they were not doing anything wrong. Most

of those who were caught were those drunk and those who

were committing crimes. They referred these violators to

the police officers and to MSWDO for proper intervention

or sanction. Those who were just seen loitering late

were assisted home after being informed and asked

regarding the curfew ordinance.

Barangay officials or tanods talked to the parents

for advises for those who were immediately sent home.

Since some parents were not aware of the said ordinance,

they were likewise informed of the ordinance.

Ranked two, is helping the economic development of

the community got an overall mean of 3.06, which is

interpreted as moderately implemented. This implies that

observance of the provisions of the ordinance of curfew

for minors has greatly influenced economic growth in the

community because a peaceful community grows rapidly.

42
Generally, there is a decline of minor offenses when

curfew was implemented.

(Personal interview 2016) Dimsy Yap, a business

owner who were interviewed said that customers will go

away if the place is not peaceful, he cited his

experience some time ago in Betag when many bystanders

are loitering in their business establishment, their

sales decrease.

Ranked four, is safeguarding the people, and

preserving peace and order in the community by

conducting patrol and inspection in the community

obtained a weighted mean of 3.04 which is interpreted as

moderately implemented. This means that the majority of

respondents perceived that people feel safe and peace is

still preserved. Nevertheless, some are not feeling

secure despite presence of law enforcers in the

community.

An old city ordinance on curfew for minors that’s

not been enforced for years has been revived in the past

weeks with policemen rounding up minors especially those

having a drinking session at the sidewalks.

43
The move follows an earlier statement of President-

Elect Rodrigo Duterte that he is eyeing the strict

enforcement of the curfew which he had set in Davao City

as mayor.

In Pasay City yesterday police rounded up 80 minors

for violating the city’s existing curfew hour which is

from 10 p.m. until 4 a.m. under “Oplan Rody” or Rid the

Streets of Drinkers and Youth, while in Mandaluyong

City, police arrested 30 minors spotted along the

streets from 10p.m. to 1:45 a.m.

The minors said they were just playing with friends

a few blocks from their residence. Others were singing

with a karaoke at a street corner in Barangay Addition

Hills.

According to Pasay City police chief, Sr. Supt.

Joel Doria, the minors were first detained at the Pasay

City detention cell in the presence of some personnel of

the local Department of Social Welfare and Development

(DSWD).

Meanwhile, Chief Insp. Jacqueline Ta-a, of the

Libertad Police Station (PS-4), said that the minors

44
were rounded up from Tuesday evening until early

yesterday morning by roving officers.

The minors, who were caught either loitering on the

streets, inside computer shops, and hanging out, were

assisted by personnel from the city’s Department of

Social Welfare and Development (DSWD).

The existing ordinance on curfew hours which was

first implemented in 1993 imposes penalties up to three

violations. Penalty for the first violation is a record

on the police blotter, second violation is community

service, and third offense is a fine of P500.

Meanwhile, the parents and guardians of the

arrested minors said they weren’t aware that there is

such an ordinance being implemented.

The city police told the parents of the arrested

minors of the city ordinance imposing curfew hours for

minors aging 18 years old and below from 10 p.m. to 4

a.m. since 1996.

The minors were released around 1 a.m. after their

parents and guardians presented identification cards.

45
A few days ago, the Las Pinas City police under Sr.

Supt. Jemar Modequillo, rounded up over about 100

persons, 70 of them minors and 30 adults who were caught

drinking along the streets and walking around half

naked.

Modequillo immediately released the 70 minors

together with their parents after he informed them of

the existing city ordinance and the dangers of allowing

minors to roam the streets late at night.

Meanwhile, the 30 adults were ordered to do 40

push- ups as punishment.

Rank 16. Closing business establishments which

deliberately allows minors to drink inside their bar,

despite of warnings given obtained the lowest mean of

2.37 interpreted as slightly implemented. The findings

implies that the implementers are not strictly enforcing

the provisions of the ordinance on curfew for minors.

Buya-an asserted that some Barangay officials are

giving favor to business owners especially if they knew

each other.

In corroboration to this, Fedcha (2011) found out

that the enforcement of closure of business

46
establishment is being implemented with bias. According

to one of the Kagawads of Poblacion Bontoc, Mountain

Province, it is true some of the business establishments

are being warned but it just stops there. When it comes

to closure of repeated violators, sometimes it is not

being carried out.

Ranked fifteen, is imposing fines to business

establishments which permit minors to drink inside their

bar or any amusements garnered the second lowest with a

weighted mean of 2.38 interpreted as slightly

implemented. This means that there is difficulty in

collecting fines from business establishments that

violates curfew for minors.

One of the Barangay kagawads in Pico said that the

procedure is too complicated and laborious, we have so

many jobs to do that’s why we prefer to avoid conflicts

with the resident because it is additional burden for

us.

Rank fourteen is arresting gang members who are bad

influence to the minors and giving them proper

counseling for them to stop and be law-abiding citizen

47
obtained the third lowest with weighted mean of 2.66

interpreted as moderately implemented. This means that

there is also difficulty in putting minors under arrest.

Barangay Kagawad in Balili asserted that it is

difficult to arrest gang members who are minors because

of RA 9344 (juvenile justice and welfare act) states

that a minor cannot be arrested and penalized. They will

just be invited to the Barangay then turn over to the

DSWD.

Differences in the level of implementation


of curfew for minors according to group

As gleaned from table 3.1, the Barangay officials

and the PNP have a higher level of perception on the

level of implementation of curfew for minors for the

reason that they are the prime movers and are the

persons responsible and accountable in implementing the

curfew for minors and who are directly involved in

observing what is really happening in the community. As

such, the members of the PNP

Table 3.1 The comparison of the level of implementation


of curfew for minors as perceived by the group
Barangay PNP
Officials Personnel Parents
1. Preventing the minors from
drinking liquor by no allowing 3.34 2.77 2.41

48
them to enter inside any
amusement establishment;
2. Arresting those persons who
are selling, using, possessing,
and transporting dangerous
drugs; 3.37 2.05 2.61
3. Imposing fines to business
establishments which permit
minors to drink inside their bar
or any amusements; 2.91 1.86 2.25
4. Closing business
establishments which
deliberately allows minors to
drink inside their bar, despite
of warnings given; 3.03 1.82 2.18
5. Preventing minors from
loitering during night time; 3.44 2.45 2.54
6. Increasing police visibility
to prevent would be minor
violators to commit crime; 3.62 3.18 2.69
7. Educating and or informing
the community on the modus
operandi (Mode of Operation) of
the minors in committing crimes
particularly on robbery; 3.35 3.18 2.55
8. Safeguarding the people, and
preserving peace and order in
the community by conducting
patrol and inspection in the
community; 3.69 3.36 2.55
9. Strictly implementing curfew
to protect the minors from
adults and fellow minors; 3.31 3.41 2.63
10. Requiring minors to go home
earlier to avoid bad influence
from gang members of the
community; 3.44 3.59 2.64
11. Suppressing and or
abolishing any bad fraternity or
sorority; 3.26 3.14 2.48
12. Arresting gang members who
are bad influence to the minors
and giving them proper
counseling for them to stop and
be law-abiding citizen; 3.29 2.91 2.16
13. Detaining minors who violate 2.88 3.14 2.50

49
curfew and immediately informing
the parents then conducting
counseling before letting them
out;
14. Educating and informing
parents, guardians with regard
to supervision, which helps them
to be responsible parent or
guardian; 3.24 3.32 2.58
15. Strengthening the
relationship between enforcers
and members of the community,
with regard to counselling of
minors; and 3.47 3.09 2.48
16. Helping the economic
development of the community. 3.58 3.18 2.71
Average 3.11 3.07 2.89

Fcomp= 20.898 p-value= 0.00 F.05= 3.204 significant

are very much confident on their performance when it

comes to the implementation of curfew for minors, this

is evident in the overall mean of 3.11 and 3.07,

interpreted as very much implemented respectively.

However, the other group of respondent which is the

parents have a lower level of perception garnered only

2.89 weighted mean, this implies that the community is

expecting for more from the implementers of the

ordinance.

Statistical analysis shows that the p-value of 0.00

is less than the alpha value of 0.05 level of

significance which means that there are significant

50
differences in the level of implementation of curfew on

minors according to group. Therefore, there is enough

evidence to accept the hypothesis that there is

significant differences in the level of implementation

of curfew on minors as perceived by the groups of

respondents.

The finding implies that respondents perceived that

there is different level of implementation of curfew on

minors La Trinidad, Benguet. This is the reason why one

of the residents in Buyagan, Poblacion stated that Law

enforcers imposed the law according to the status in

life of the violators.

Degree of Seriousness of the problems encountered in the

implementation of curfew on minors as perceived by the

group.

The degree of seriousness of the problems

encountered in the implementation of curfew on minors

were shown in Table 4. It was shown that the overall

mean is 2.96 which is interpreted as moderately serious.

Table 4. Degree of seriousness of problems encountered


in the implementation of curfew on minors
Descriptive
Indicators W.M Equivalent Rank
1. Public apathy, allowing minors Moderately
to stay out in a public place; 2.95 Serious 10

51
2. Business owners allow minors to Highly
drink inside any amusement place; 3.3 Serious 2
3. The public does not care even
if the enforcers are around to Moderately
implement the curfew program; 2.96 Serious 9
4. Number of police officers who
are directly involved in the
implementation of curfew is not
enough to cover the whole Highly
municipality; 3.33 Serious 1
5. Police cars are unavailable for Moderately
transportation; 2.88 Serious 10
6. Lack of gas allocation for Moderately
vehicles; 2.78 Serious 14
7. There are still minors present
in public places during curfew is Moderately
not being implemented; 3.12 Serious 3.5
8. Sometimes curfew is not being Moderately
implemented; 3.11 Serious 5
9. There are those elective
officials and enforcers of curfew Moderately
who does not support the program; 2.8 Serious 11
10. There’s lack of discipline of Moderately
minors; 3.09 Serious 6
11. Enforcers abuse their
authority in implementing the Moderately
curfew; 2.52 Serious 17
12. Public does not divulge Moderately
information to the enforcers; 2.77 Serious 15
Moderately
13. The minors are armed; 2.79 Serious 12
14. Violators are in the influence
of drugs and or intoxicating Moderately
liquor; 3.12 Serious 3.5
15. Violators are mentally Moderately
deranged; 2.74 Serious 16
16. There are many bad influences,
fraternities/Sororities within the Moderately
community; and 3.04 Serious 8
17. Parents/Guardians permit, or
insufficient control allow the
minor to remain at any public
place or on the premises of any
establishment within the Moderately
municipality during curfew hours. 3.06 Serious 7
Average 2.96 Moderately

52
Serious

This implies that there are many problems still

being encountered by the implementers of curfew for

minors as perceived by the respondents.

PO3 Balanoy revealed that there is lack of full

cooperation of different government agencies concern,

lack of facilities to cater to the needs of the curfew

for minors and financial and logistics need is

insufficient such as mobile car.

Ranked one, is number of police officers who are

directly involved in the implementation of curfew is not

enough to cover the whole municipality garnered the

highest mean of 3.33 interpreted as highly serious

because violators tend to thrive when PNP personnel and

Barangay officials are not visible to the public. The

finding implies that the most common problem perceived

by the respondents is the absence of police officer in

the neighborhood.

SPO1 Tumingeb said that one of the reasons why this

is identified as highly serious is because people are

already accustomed with the presence of police officer.

Whatever problems the community had such as fire or

broken lights the first agency this problem will be

53
referred to is the police, although it is the job of

fire department or BENECO.

The police are the first line of defense against

crime. It has been concluded that crime will be reduced

if the number of police will be increased. The PNP has

targeted a 1:700 police-to-population ratio in 2010;

1:600 in 2020; and 1:500 in 2030. The actual police-to

population ratio for 2010 was registered at 1:662,

better than the target. With the hiring of additional

police officers, the ratio has further improved to 1:620

as of March 2013. However, the Philippines still fares

poorly compared to its Asian neighbors

In contrast, Margaret Weigel (2011) said that A

curfew’s impact is not dependent on the number of police

officers enforcing it. Parents appear to be the primary

curfew enforcers, and that “municipal curfews act as

focal point in the establishment of household policies.”

Business owners allow minors to drink inside any

amusement place rank number 2 with a weighted mean of

3.3 which is interpreted as highly serious. This implies

that despite of many laws being enforced many Business

owners remain opened for minors.

54
(Personal Interview) Batoyong (2016)”I have to do

violate some rules because I am paying high rentals and

taxes and my collection for groceries is never enough to

sustain my liabilities. So I secretly offer liquor to

minors since they are my common customer revealed by a

semi-bar owner”. (Personal interview)

Ranked three, is there are still minors present in

public places during curfew is not being implemented and

violators are in the influence of drugs and or

intoxicating liquor both garnered a weighted mean of

3.12 Which is interpreted as moderately serious.

This means that minors are still loitering in

public places because entrance is free such as in public

parks, computer shops and bars and it also mean that

majority of violators are under influence of drugs and

liquor.

In relation to this, According to Fedcha (2011) it

is not only here in the Philippines that experience

problems on minors who indulge in alcohol drinking.

According to the International Institute for Alcohol

Awareness (IIAA), underage drinking is a serious

national problem that costs the United States $62.6

billion each year in deaths, injuries, property damage,

55
and related economic and productivity losses.

Tragically, illegal consumption of alcohol by minors led

to 3, 212 deaths and 2.4 million other harmful events in

the lives in American families in 2001. In fact,

underage drinkers account for about 16 percent of all

alcohol consumed in the United States annually.

Summary of Findings

The major findings are the following:

1. The objectives of the curfew on minors in La

Trinidad, Benguet is moderately attained. Safeguarding

the people, and preserving peace and order in the

community by conducting patrol and inspection in the

community obtained the highest mean while closing

establishments which deliberately allows minors to drink

inside their bar, despite warnings given have the lowest

mean.

1.1 There is a significant difference on the

perception of the respondents as to the level of

attainment of the objectives of curfew for minors in La

Trinidad, Benguet.

56
2. The perceptions of the respondents as to the level of

implementation of curfew for minors is moderately

implemented. Increasing police visibility to prevent

would be minor violators to commit crime and requiring

minors to go home earlier to avoid bad influence from

gang members of the community have the highest rank

while closing business establishments which deliberately

allows minors to drink inside their bar, despite of

warnings given earned the lowest mean.

2.1 There is significant difference on the

perception of respondents as to the level of

implementation of curfew for minors.

3. The perceptions of the respondents as to the degree

of seriousness of the problems encountered in the

implementation of curfew for minors is moderately

implemented. The following problems garnered the highest

rank respectively:

Rank 1. Number of police officers who are

directly involved in the implementation of curfew is not

enough to cover the whole municipality

Rank 2. Business owners allow minors to drink

inside any amusement place;

57
Rank 3. There are still minors present in

public places during curfew is not being implemented.

CHAPTER 4

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the conclusions and

recommendations as regards the curfew on minors in La

Trinidad, Benguet.

Conclusions

The study deduced the following conclusions in

relation to the specific problems of the study:

1. The moderate attainment of the objectives of

curfew on minors is attributed to the unforeseen factors

that affects the attainment of the objectives like

occurrence of emergencies, special holidays and events

such as Adivay where attention of law enforcers are

diverted, and also some minors are not aware that there

is such curfew on minors in La Trinidad that’s why they

are loitering in public places.

58
2. The implementation of curfew on minors is

moderate due to inevitable factors such as lack of

manpower, insufficient budget and uncooperative parents.

Moreover, some young people are unwilling to cooperate

for they believe it is a violation of their rights to

travel.

3. Lack of full cooperation of different government

agencies concern, lack of facilities to cater to the

needs of the curfew for minors and financial and

logistics need is insufficient such as mobile car are

the reasons why the problems encountered in the

implementation of curfew on minors is highly serious.

Recommendations

In view of the findings and conclusions derived

from the study, the following are recommended:

1. The Law Enforcers and the Barangay officials

must endeavor to strictly enforce the law especially

closing business establishments which deliberately

allows minors to drink inside their bar by filing

corresponding case to court immediately. Thus, other

would be violator will hesitate to do the same.

2. The law enforcers and Barangay officials must

make sure that business establishments which permit

59
minors to drink inside their bar or amusement will be

sued in court.

3. The PNP and other law enforcement bodies must

endeavor to arrest gang members so that they will not

influence more minors to join them and must initiate

strong coordination with DSWD for more productive

intervention such as professional counselling.

4. The PNP, Barangay officials and the community

members must endeavor to request the authorities

concerned for more PNP personnel to be deployed in the

different Barangays.

5. The law enforcement bodies must initiate

partnership with the parents in preventing minors from

loitering in public places with in curfew hours.

6. Funded researches on the responsiveness and

implementation of curfew on minors must be initiated and

carried out for further development.

7. Further researches are encouraged to be

conducted in order to make assessments on the strategies

currently employed by the authorities for a more

productive curfew on minors.

60
8. There should be a clear cut policies in

imposing fines to business establishment who are

coddling minors.

REFERENCES

Adams. K. (2003) The effectiveness of juvenile curfews

at crime prevention. Retrieved on Dec.13, 2015 from

http://www.nyclu.org/files/gv _curfew_study-(9th

Ed.). U. S. A: Thomson Wadsworth.

Araneta, S. (2012) Manila to enforce curfew for minors

during summer break. Retrieved on January 15, 2016

from http://www.philstar.com/.../manila-enforce-

curfew-minors-during-summer-bre...

Asuncion, W. (2016) Review of Curfew edict up.

Retrrieved on June 30, 2016 from

http://www.baguiomidlandcourier.com.

61
ph/city.asp?mode=%20archives/2016/june/6-26-

2016/city4-Review-of-curfew-edict-up.txt

Balangen, C. (2011) Young Lurkers at Night: Awareness

and Compliance of Selected La Trinidad High School

Students on Curfew Ordinance. Retrieved on August

6, 2016 from

http://digilib.bsu.edu.ph/greenstone/collect/underg

ra/index/assoc/HASH017f.dir/doc.pdf

Brannen, S. (2002). Thresholds mentoring juvenile

justice ministry in the Archdiocese of Santa Fe.

Retrieved on February 12, 2016 from

http://yvj.sagepub.com/content/6/4323.full.pdf

Caleca, A. (2003) DOJ backs nationwide curfew proposal

for minors. Retrieved on April 8 2016 from

http://www.philstar.com/headlines/199871/doj-backs-

nationwide-curfew-proposal-minors

Cochran, T. (1997) U.S. Conference of Mayors. A Status

Report on Youth curfews in America’s Cities.

Retrieved on May 15, 2016 from

usmayors.org/publications/curfew.htm

Fedcha, R., (2011) Curfew for minors in the Municipality

of Bontoc, Moutain Province. Unpublished Master’s

Thesis, University of Baguio, Baguio City.

62
Find Law, (2013). Juvenile Curfew Laws-The Basics.

Retrieved on August 4, 2016 from

http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-

charges/juvenile-curfew-laws-the-basics.html

Kiglasan, H.A., (1999) The anti-vice campaign of the

Baguio City Police office, 1998. Unpublished

Master’s thesis, Baguio Central University, Baguio

City.

Kline, P. (2011). The Impact of Juvenile Curfew Laws on

Arrests of Youth and Adults. Retrieved on August 2,

2016 from NBER pkline@econ.berkeley.edu.

http://eml.berkeley.edu/~pkline/papers/curfews_resu

bmit.pdf

Manwong, R. and Delizo D., (2006). Law Enforcement

Administration: A textbook in Criminology.

Philippines: RK Manwong Publications.

Manwong, R. K. (2008). Fundamentals of criminology.

Philippines: Wiseman’s Books Trading, Inc.

Ramos, F. V., (1975). Ang tala. Philippine Daily

Express, 6.

Regalado, E. (2016) Nationwide curfew, liquor ban eyed.

Retrieved on July 20, 2016 from

63
http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/06/28/159739

2/nationwide-curfew-liquor-ban-eyed

Seigel, L. (2004). Criminology, theories, patterns and

typologies (8th ed.). Massachusetts: Thomson

Wadsworth.

Seigel, L., Welsh, B., & Senna J. (2007). Juvenile

Deliquency

Shatz, Zhang, and McGrath (1999) Effect of a curfew law

on juvenile trauma. Retrieved on July 20, 2016

from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10608527

Solmerin, F. (2013) Curfew for minors to be enforced.

Retrieved on June 12, 2016 from

http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/2013/04/12/curfe

w-of-minors-to-be-enforced/

Southern Illinois University, (2006). What is crime

prevention. Retrieved on June 23, 2016 from

http://www.dps.siu.edu/cp_what_is_cp.htm

Tradio, C. (1994). Introduction to criminology. Revised

edition: 92 Quezon Avenue, Q.C. Law Book

publishing.

West’s encyclopedia of American law, (2nd ed.). (2008).

Retrieved on June 26, 2016 from

64
http://www.encyclopedia.com/toopic/Ku_Klux_Klan.asp

Youth Protection Ordinance, (2013). Curfew hours for

minors. Retrieved on February 13, 2016 from

http://www.hayward-

ca.gov/CITY.../CITY.../CurfewHoursforMinors.pdf

APPENDICES
Appendix A
Communication Letters
July 7, 2016

PCI RADINO S. BELLY


Chief of Police

65
La Trinidad, Benguet

Dear SIR:

Greetings!

The undersigned student of Cordillera Career


Development College is conducting a study entitled “Curfew
for Minors in the Municipality of La Trinidad, Benguet” in
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of
Master of Science in Public Administration.

In this regard, may he find favor in your good office


to allow him administer his questionnaire and conduct
informal interviews among the personnel of La Trinidad
Municipal Police Office.

Rest assured that whatever data and/ or information


gathered will be treated with utmost confidentiality and
be taken and analyzed in an objective manner.

He is looking forward to your favorable response and


may you find his request worthy of your approval.

Thank you very much and God bless!

Respectfully yours,

LOURENCE B. MIGUEL
Researcher

Noted by

DR. ABELLO K. FERNANDO


Adviser

DR. MARINA SAGANDOY


Dean, Graduate School

July 7, 2016

ROMEO K. SALDA
Mayor
La Trinidad, Benguet

Dear SIR:

66
Greetings!

The undersigned student of Cordillera Career


Development College is conducting a study entitled “Curfew
for Minors in the Municipality of La Trinidad, Benguet” in
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of
Master of Science in Public Administration.

In this regard, may he find favor in your good office


to allow him administer his questionnaire and conduct
informal interviews among the Barangay officials and some
parents in your Barangay.

Rest assured that whatever data and/ or information


gathered will be treated with utmost confidentiality and
be taken and analyzed in an objective manner.

He is looking forward to you favorable response and


may you find his request worthy of your approval.

Thank you very much and God bless!

Respectfully yours,

LOURENCE B. MIGUEL
Researcher

Noted by

DR. ABELLO K. FERNANDO


Adviser

DR. MARINA SAGANDOY


Dean, Graduate School

PETER D. COMILAY
Punong Barangay
Betag, La Trinidad, Benguet

Dear SIR:

Greetings!

67
The undersigned student of Cordillera Career
Development College is conducting a study entitled “Curfew
for Minors in the Municipality of La Trinidad, Benguet” in
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of
Master of Science in Public Administration.

In this regard, may he find favor in your good office


to allow him administer his questionnaire and conduct
informal interviews among the Barangay officials and some
parents in your Barangay.

Rest assured that whatever data and/ or information


gathered will be treated with utmost confidentiality and
be taken and analyzed in an objective manner.

He is looking forward to you favorable response and


may you find his request worthy of your approval.

Thank you very much and God bless!

Respectfully yours,

LOURENCE B. MIGUEL
Researcher

Noted by

DR. ABELLO K. FERNANDO


Adviser

DR. MARINA SAGANDOY


Dean, Graduate School

Appendix B
Questionnaire
CORDILLERA CAREER DEVELOPMENT COLLEGE

68
Poblacion La Trinidad, Benguet
GRADUATE SCHOOL

Dear Respondent:
The undersigned student of Cordillera Career
Development College is conducting a research entitled
“Curfew on Minors in the Municipality of La Trinidad,
Benguet” in partial fulfillment of requirements for the
Degree of Master of Public Administration.
In this regard, my he request your assistance by
answering the attached survey questionnaire. Honest
response to each item is needed so as to obtain reliable
data relative to the said study.
Rest assured that all information that will be gathered
shall be treated with utmost confidentiality.

Thank you so much and God bless!

Respectfully yours,

Lourence B. Miguel
Researcher

Name (optional):_____________________________
Group:
____PNP Personnel ____Barangay Official _____Parent

I. The level of attainment of the objectives of curfew


on minors.

69
Direction: Please put a check mark ( ) on the box that
corresponds to your perception with regards to the level
of attainment of the objectives of curfew for minors in
La Trinidad, Benguet.
Use the following scale:
4 –Much Implemented (MI)
3 – Moderately implemented (MI)
2 – Slightly implemented (SI)
1 – Not implemented (NI)

Indicators MI MI SI NI
4 3 2 1
1. Preventing the minors from drinking
liquor by no allowing them to enter
inside any amusement establishment;
2. Arresting those persons who are
selling, using, possessing, and
transporting dangerous drugs;
3. Imposing fines to business
establishments which permit minors
to drink inside their bar or any
amusements;
4. Closing business establishments
which deliberately allows minors to
drink inside their bar, despite of
warnings given;
5. Preventing minors from loitering
during night time;
6. Increasing police visibility to
prevent would be minor violators to
commit crime;
7. Educating and or informing the
community on the modus operandi
(Mode of Operation) of the minors
in committing crimes particularly
on robbery;
8. Safeguarding the people, and
preserving peace and order in the
community by conducting patrol and
inspection in the community;

70
9. Strictly implementing curfew to
protect the minors from adults and
fellow minors;
10. Requiring minors to go home
earlier to avoid bad influence from
gang members of the community;
11. Suppressing and or abolishing any
bad fraternity or sorority;
12. Arresting gang members who are
bad influence to the minors and
giving them proper counseling for
them to stop and be law-abiding
citizen;
13. Detaining minors who violate
curfew and immediately informing
the parents then conducting
counseling before letting them out;
14. Educating and informing parents,
guardians with regard to
supervision, which helps them to be
responsible parent or guardian.
15. Strengthening the relationship
between enforcers and members of
the community, with regard to
counselling of minors; and
16. Helping the economic development
of the community.

II. The level of implementation of curfew on minors in


La Trinidad, Benguet.

Direction: Please put a check mark ( ) on the box that


corresponds to your perception with regards to the level
of attainment of the objectives of curfew for minors in
La Trinidad, Benguet.

Use the following scale:


4 – Much Attained (MA)
3 – Moderately Attained (MA)
2 – Slightly Attained (SA)
1 – Not Attained (NA)

71
Indicators MA MA SA NA
4 3 2 1
1. Preventing the minors from drinking liquor
by no allowing them to enter inside any
amusement establishment;
2. Arresting those persons who are selling,
using, possessing, and transporting
dangerous drugs;
3. Imposing fines to business establishments
which permit minors to drink inside their
bar or any amusements;
4. Closing business establishments which
deliberately allows minors to drink inside
their bar, despite of warnings given;
5. Preventing minors from loitering during
night time;
6. Increasing police visibility to prevent
would be minor violators to commit crime;
7. Educating and or informing the community
on the modus operandi (Mode of Operation)
of the minors in committing crimes
particularly on robbery;
8. Safeguarding the people, and preserving
peace and order in the community by
conducting patrol and inspection in the
community;
9. Strictly implementing curfew to protect
the minors from adults and fellow minors;
10. Requiring minors to go home earlier to
avoid bad influence from gang members of
the community;
11. Suppressing and or abolishing any bad
fraternity or sorority;
12. Arresting gang members who are bad
influence to the minors and giving them
proper counseling for them to stop and be
law-abiding citizen;
13. Detaining minors who violate curfew and
immediately informing the parents then
conducting counseling before letting them
out;
14. Educating and informing parents,
guardians with regard to supervision,
which helps them to be responsible parent
or guardian.
15. Strengthening the relationship between
enforcers and members of the community,
with regard to counselling of minors; and
16. Helping the economic development of the
community.

72
III. Degree of seriousness of Problems Encountered in
the implementation curfew on minors in La Trinidad,
Benguet.
Direction: Please put a check mark ( ) on the box that
corresponds to your perception with regards to the
degree of seriousness encountered in the implementation
of curfew for minors in La Trinidad, Benguet.

Degree of seriousness of Problems Encountered in the


implementation curfew for minors in La Trinidad,
Benguet.
Use the following scale:
4 –Highly Serious (VS)
3 – Moderately Serious (MS)
2 – Slightly Serious (SS)
1 – Not a Problem (NaP)

Indicators HS MS SS NaP
What is the degree of seriousness of 4 3 2 1
problems in the following:
1. Public apathy, allowing minors to stay out
in a public place;
2. Business owners allow minors to drink
inside any amusement place;
3. The public does not care even if the
enforcers are around to implement the
curfew program;
4. Number of police officers who are directly
involved in the implementation of curfew
is not enough to cover the whole
municipality;
5. Police cars are unavailable for
transportation;
6. Lack of gas allocation for vehicles;
7. There are still minors present in public
places during curfew is not being
implemented;
8. Sometimes curfew is not being implemented;
9. There are those elective officials and
enforcers of curfew who does not support
the program;

73
10. There’s lack of discipline of minors;
11. Enforcers abuse their authority in
implementing the curfew;
12. Public does not divulge information to
the enforcers;
13. The minors are armed;
14. Violators are in the influence of drugs
and or intoxicating liquor;
15. Violators are mentally deranged;
16. There are many bad influences,
fraternities/Sororities within the
community; and
17. Parents/Guardians permit, or
insufficient control allow the minor to
remain at any public place or on the
premises of any establishment within the
municipality during curfew hours.

74
CURRICULLUM VITAE

LOURENCE BUASEN MIGUEL


Dupax del Norte, Nueva Viscaya

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Date of Birth January 12, 1978

Place of Birth Atok, Benguet

Citizenship Filipino

Civil Status Married

Provincial Address Nueva Viscaya

Name of Spouse Rosebel Buya-an Miguel

Name of Children Hezekiah B. Miguel

Jeshurun B. Miguel

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Graduate Studies Masters in Public


Administration

Tertiary Bachelor of Science in


Criminology
Cordillera Career
Development College (CCDC)
April 2000

Secondary Lamo National Highschool

75
Dupax del Norte, Nueva
Viscaya
March 1995

Elementary Bitnong Elementary School


Dupax del Norte, Nueva
Viscaya
March 1990

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Instructor 4 Cordillera Career


Development College (CCDC)
June 2001 – present

TEST TAKEN/ELIGIBILITIES

Criminologist Licensure Examination


Baguio City
October 2000

Civil Service Professional


September 2000

Civil Service Eligibility for Police Officer


August 2000

76

S-ar putea să vă placă și