Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Paediatric Journal
(1966) 2 : 20
CRANIUM BIFIDUM.
INVESTIGATION, PROGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT*
N. BARROW1 and D. A. SIMPSOW
From the Adelaide Children’s Hospital
SYNOPSIS
The term cranium bifidum includes the encephaloceles and the cranial meningoceles.
Though rarer than spina bifida, these conditions are not uncommon, and their man-
agement can be difficult. A series of 14 patients is presented to illustrate the prob-
lems, and to show that treatment can produce good results where there are no crippling
associated cerebral dysplasias. The value of contrast radiological investigations to demon-
strate these dysplasias is emphasized. Some interesting and unexplained variations in the
geographical incidence of this condition are discussed.
Although there is widespread interest in the The series consists of 10 females and 4
surgical treatment of congenital malformations males. One was born of recently settled
of the central nervous system, attention has German immigrants, 3 of aboriginal parents,
been directed chiefly to the management of and the other 10 were born of Australian
spina bifida, and there has been little given parents, presumably of European descent.
to the rarer conditions of cranium bifidum In the period in which these patients were
and encephalocele. seen, there were 140 patients with spina
Cranium bifidum is a congenital defect in bifida, a ratio of 1:lO.
the bones of the skull, usually situated in the
midline. Almost always this defect is accom- The majority of the patients presented very
panied by protrusion of meninges, containing early in life, 4 were less than a day old, 5
fluid or neural tissue; the former is usually were aged less than one month, and the re-
known as a cranial meningocele, and the latter maining 5 were aged 2 to 7 months.
as an encephalocele. An encephalocele is The lesions occurred predominantly in the
such a gross malformation that it has always occipital region as shown in Table I in which
been noted in studies of neonatal malforma- the series of Ingraham and Matson (1954)
tions. However, the therapeutic problems in- is included for comparison.
volved have received little attention until
comparatively recently. Even today, there are In 5 the lesion in the occipital region was
few easily available articles offering guidance a meningocele, one of which was associated
to the surgeon confronted by one of these with a cervical spinal meningocele and a
lumbar spina bifida occulta; in each of the
lesions.
others there was an encephalocele of varied
size.
CLINICAL MATERIAL
Our material consists of 14 patients who
TABLE I
presented at the Adelaide Children’s Hospital Site of Cranium Bifxdum: 14 Cases
during their infancy between the years 1955-
Ingraham
1964. Although small, the series has the merit Present & Matson
that the progress in all the patients has been Location series (1954)
assessed recently. ~~~~ -
Occipital .................... 11 139
Parietal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 27
Received on October 28, 1965. Frontal .................... 2 11
*Supported by a grant from the Neurological Research Foun-
dation of South Australia. Nasal and Naso-
1. Research Assistant.
2. Hon. Assistant Neurosurgeon. pharyngeal ................ - 10
?;. EARXOW
AND D. A . SIMPSON 21
TREATMENT
Ten patients underwent operation; 6 cranial
Fig. 1. Occipital encephalocele (Case VIII, Table meningoceles, and 2 encephaloceles were re-
IV), in an aboriginal infant aged 5 weeks. The large moved from the occipital region, 2 encephalo-
globular mass wae attached immediately below the
external occipital protruberance by a narrow pedicle. celes from the frontal region.
CRANIUM BIFIDUM-INVESTIGATION
PROGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT
Radio-
Case No. Lesion graphic Associated Cerebral Treatment Result
Investiga- Abnormalities
tions
I Occipital L&V Hydrocephalus Excision Normal
meningocele Chiari malfor- V-C Shunt IQ 106
mation
Aqueduct stenosis
I1 Occipital Excision Normal
-
menineocele
I11 Occipital
meningocele
- - Excision Normal
IQ 105
IV Occipital L Chiari Type I11 Excision Retarded
meningocele DQ 60
Cervical spinal (Institu-
meningocele t ion )
I - -1
~~
XI Occipital Microcephaly
encephalocele Cerebellar agenesis
Cortical dysplasia
XI1 Parietal - Microcephaly - Died
encephalocele Cortical dysplasia
XI11 Frontal L&V Microcephaly Excision Retarded
encephalocele Hydrocephalus Repair by
Porencephaly bone graft
Aqueduct stenosis
-
XIV Frontal L Unilateral frontal Replaced Normal
encephalocele atrophy Repair by
Rudimentary optic tantalum
nerve mesh
94 CRANIUM BIFIDUM-INVESTIGATION PROGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT
Deliberate subdural insufflation may be par- since, have found that occipital lesions carry
ticularly helpful here. In infants, air can the worst prognosis because of the frequency
usually be introduced into the subdural space of associated hydrocephalus, but it seems
at the conclusion of a pneumo-encephalogram likely that this opinion needs some qualifica-
by inverting the baby from prone position and tion now that the operation of ventriculo-
gently shaking; when the head is dependent atrial shunt permits efficient treatment in most
and the buttocks elevated, air will usually cases of hydrocephalus. Ingraham and Swan
enter the subdural space through the original reported that 20 of 59 surviving patients were
puncture. When this does not occur, a burr- mentally and physically normal, and Fisher,
hole is needed. Uihlein, and Keith (1952) that 25 of 59
The excision of the encephalocele or men- 'cases were 'in good condition'. Seven of the
ingocele is in most cases a minor procedure 10 patients we have operated upon are either
and can be performed in the first few weeks normal or suffering from physical disabilities
of life. Leakage of cerebrospinal fluid or not incompatible with a useful and happy life.
ulceration of the investing membrane are in- All but one have had a psychometric assess-
dications for urgent operation. However, a ment.
fronto-nasal encephalocele requires a com- The incidence of associated congenital ab-
paratively elaborate repair, and this may be normalities is also reported to be higher
easier if operation is deferred (Ingraham and in cranium bifidum than in spina bifida
Matson 1954). No special difficulties were (Schwidde, 1952; Cohn and Hamby, 1953),
encountered in the repair of a large fronto- but in our series, although associated con-
nasal encephalocele at the age of 3 months. genital abnormalities of the brain are numer-
It may be wise, where possible, to operate ous, extracranial abnormalities were unex-
before the paranasal air cells have become pectedly rare.
pneumatised. It may also be prudent, as It is interesting to note that a definite geo-
Chaturaporn (1964) has suggested, to leave graphical variation in the frequency of
an intranasal encephalocele in situ, only cranium bifidum as compared with spina
transecting its base, and repairing the dural bifida exists in the literature. In America,
defect, for removal of intranasal cerebral tis- Ingraham and Swan (1943) reported a ratio
sue may introduce the risk of meningitis. of 15.5, and Fisher, et al., (-1952) a ratio of
Progressive hydrocephalus complicating 1:8. In Germany, Benger and Schonbauer
cranium bifidum merits treatment if there are (1958) and Hemmer (1962) report an in-
no other contra-indications, and we now re- cidence of 1:l and 1:2 respectively. It seems
commend the universally applicable procedure likely that cranium bifidum is more common
of ventriculo-atrial shunt for hydrocephalus in eastern Europe generally. The location of
occurring in the first year of life. In older the lesions in the cranium also differs in dif-
children with a block at the aqueduct, a ven- ferent parts of the world. In America occi-
triculo-cisternal or ventriculo-spinal shunt is pital lesions are more numerous than frontal
preferable. A preliminary lumbar air en- lesions in the proportion of 63:21 (Ingraham
cephalogram, as well as a ventriculogram, and Swan, 1943), and the same occurs in
should be performed to establish the patency Germany where Hemmer (1962) gives a
of the external subarachnoid cisterns. This ratio of 20:l; but in Russia, it seems the re-
was in fact done in the one patient who re- verse is found: Sokolov (1954) gives a ratio
quired such surgery, and the result has been of 26 frontal lesions to 4 occipital, and Zverev
satisfactory. (1956) gives an even bigger ratio of 193:14.
Many reported series leave the reader in Chaturaporn (1964) indicated that frontal
doubt about the mentality of the survivors, lesions are more common throughout eastern
but it is clear that there is a high incidence Asia. In conformity with the American and
of severe mental disability, certainly higher German reports, occipital lesions were more
than with spina bifida (Schwidde, 1952). common in our series (Table I ) . Females
Ingraham and Swan (1943), and others were also more commonly affected in our
26 CRANIUM BIFIDUM-INVESTIGATION
PROGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT
series than in the Russian literature: for ex- Chaturaporn, Hongraprabhas ( 1964). Personal Com-
munication.
ample, Sokolov (1954) gives an incidence of Cohn, G. A. and Hamby, W. B. (1953). Surgery
17 males to 13 females, while the ratio of of cranium bifidum and spina bifida; a follow-up
males to females given by Poleshchyk (1956) report of 64 cases. J. Neurosurg., 10, 297.
Fisher, R. G., Uihlein, A., and Keith, H. M. (1952).
is 16:7. Spina bifida and cranium bifidum; a study of 530
cases. Proc. Staff Meet., Mayo Clin., 27, 33.
CONCLUSIONS Hemmer, R. (1962). About the treatment and prog-
The term cranium bifidum covers a wide nosis of meningoceles, myeloceles and encephalo-
celes with reference to modern procedures of treat-
range of cranial and cerebral malformations, ment of hydrocephalus. Munch. med Wschr., 104,
often very complex and clinically formidable. 2404.
Obstructive hydrocephalus is common. Each Ingraham, F. D. and Matson, D. D. (1954). Neuro-
surgery of infancy and childhood. C. C. Thomas,
case needs thorough assessment, in which air Springfield, 111.
encephalography is invaluable. Surgical Ingraham, F. D. and Swan, H. (1943). Spina bifida
treatment is often simple, and the majority of and cranium bifidum; a survey of 546 cases. New
Engl. J . Med., 228. 559.
cases treated have a normal mentality. Jefferson, A. and Lewtas, N. (1963). Value of tomog-
Modern methods of treatment of hydro- raphy and subdural pneumography in subfrontal
cephalus have increased the scope of surgical fractures. Acfu rudiol. [Diagn] (Stockh.) 1, 118.
intervention; nevertheless some cases are un- Lorber, J. ( 1961). Systematic ventriculographic stud-
ies in infants born with meningomyelocele and en-
treatable, and these should be identified as cephalocele. The incidence and development of
early as possible. hydrocephalus. Arch. Dis. Childh., 36, 381.
Poleshchuk, I. S. (1956). Our experience in surgical
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS treatment of congenital cerebral hernia. V o p .
We wish to thank the Board of Management of Neirokhir, 20, 39.
the Adelaide Children’s Hospital for permission to Schwidde, J. T. (1952). Spina bifida; survey of 225
report the cases published in this article. We also encephaloceles, meningoceles and myelomeningo-
thank Dr. M. Fowler for assistance in the patho- celes. Amer. J. Dis. Childh., 84, 35.
logical studies, Mrs. H. Thiede for histo-pathological Sokolov, N. I. (1954). Congenital encephalocele.
work and Mr. R. Boyd for photography. Khirurgiya (Mosk.), 9, 37.
Voris, H. C. (1948). Spina bifida and cranium bi-
REFERENCES fidum. J. int. Coll. Surg., ll, 634.
Benzer, H. and Schonbauer, L. (1958). Report on 49 Zverev, A. F. (1956). Evaluation of various meth-
brain and spinal cord ruptures. Miinch. med ods of operating on congenital cerebral hernia.
Wschr., 100, 565. Khirugiya ( M o s k . ) 32, 60.