Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Derek Wong
April 5th, 2018
ETEC 530 65 B
Introduction
The introduction to my lesson includes a video clip of a marketing scheme produced by Derren
Brown, a world-famous mentalist and illusionist. The goal of his campaign is to challenge the
beliefs of “professionals” and to re-define what knowledge is by dictating their thought
processes’ through manipulation. Following the viewing of the video clip, we begin with a
discussion with the students about personal experiences. We make connections with our real-
world experiences, and we draw from the knowledge and experiences of others that we have
known. Pritchard, states that “Much of our knowledge is thus social in the sense that it involves
a process of co-operation between lots of different people, including people in different parts
of the world and even people who have long since passed away but who transmitted their
knowledge on to subsequent generations.” (Pritchard, D. 2014. P. 81). It becomes apparent for
the students on the diversity of experiences they share while sitting in a common classroom.
This initiates the thought for students to challenge their beliefs of knowledge. As the discussion
progresses, the educator is tasked with challenging the students to continue the conversation
through a posed question of “What if the video itself is fake/scripted and now I’m manipulating
their knowledge through a video of someone else manipulating another someone else’s
knowledge?” This provides me an opportunity to introduce the idea and help students see the
“instrumental value of true belief, think about any subject matter that is of consequence to
you, such as the time of your crucial job interview.” (Pritchard, D. 2014. P. 10). This first activity
intentionally highlights students that are high learners in discussion purposes as this portion is
heavily based off conversational knowledge. Continue to allow students to discuss and talk
about where they derived their knowledge from and how it can be manipulated, modified,
improved, or corrected in the context of their space-based learning needs. Ask them to make a
connection to the video and how the individuals in the video share similar or same relationships
as these students do with their peers. When the conversation begins to drain, end the
conversation with a quote from one of our readings: “The problem with mere true belief,
however, is that, unlike knowledge, it is very unstable. Suppose, for example, that as you were
walking to this restaurant you noticed that none of the landmarks corresponded to where they
ought to be on the fake map in front you. You pass the town hall, for instance, and yet
according to the map this building is on the other side of town. You’d quickly realise that the
map you’re using is unreliable, and in all likelihood you’d abandon your belief about where
the nearest restaurant was, thereby preventing you from getting there.” (Pritchard, D. 2014. P.
11). To complete the activity, ask the students how your example can be related to the video.
The reason I have chosen to mix instrumental value and true belief into a topic of digital media
and marketing strategies is because of the apparent growth in the use of technology, social
media and e-learning strategies in today’s education standards. Students should begin to realize
at a younger age that although these technologies have their benefits in supporting their
learning, they can also have the potential to manipulate their ideas and cloud the way the
students think in a critical manner. An understanding and challenge to the traditional way of
providing information for these students (through multimedia) is a hope that it will begin to
enable students to judge material for validity before accepting it as truth.
Our lesson continues with an activity that presents itself as a worksheet. The students begin by
filling out a KWL (Sunal) worksheet (what do they know, what do they want to know and what
have they learned) on marketing strategies and digital/social media prompts. The KWL chart is a
constructivist activity that assesses prior knowledge, and allows for reflective practice in the
students. In summation, Murdoch, an expert on reflective practice has fought for the idea that
students must include forms of self-assessment and self-reflective practices in order to truly
understanding what it is they are trying to learn (Murdoch, 2005). This activity also acts as an
pre-cursor to our next activity which will be outlined in the next paragraph. The need for
assessing of prior knowledge assists the teacher in knowing where they have to bridge the gaps
in learning, and provide additional scaffolds in an appropriate fashion. Students in this activity
are also given a different opportunity to express their knowledge. In the first activity, it was
purely verbal whereas this activity is a written chart. As this activity is a bridge between the
introduction and the bulk of our lesson, we can conduct the revisiting technique which is a
“concept of taking a step back to recall the collective memory of the group through targeted
discussion and questioning, that sets the stage for establishing the foundation for the next
stage of the process/project” (Fosnot, Chapter 12). We re-visit what we had just learned, what
we have currently completed and discuss what we will complete next. We emphasize
collaborative learning and ensure that students know they “need to ask questions, generate
hypotheses, model, test for validity, defend and discuss ideas” (Fosnot, 2013, P. 33).
In the largest activity of the lesson, the students will perform an activity where they will enter
their surroundings and connect the learning they have just completed in the classroom with
real models they search for in the school. This activity is a continuation of building on multiple
intelligence as “intelligences are relatively independent of one another and that individuals
have distinct profiles of intelligences; assessments of each intelligence have to be
developed.” (Gardner, P. 5). It gives students such as kinesthetic learners a chance to move
around and physically search in their surroundings for inclusions to their assignment. In an
article we read in class, it highlighted “The problem of the heavy reliance on textbooks during
science lessons was addressed in the American Association for the Advancement of Science
Report (1989), noting that the present science textbooks and methods of instruction
emphasized the learning of answers more than the exploration of questions, memory at the
expense of critical thoughts, bits and pieces of information instead of understanding in context,
recitation over argument, reading in lieu of doing.” (So, 2002). As a modern educator in varying
the context of learning for students, my lesson attempts to combat the problem highlighted in
the above quote by removing the reliance on textbooks, and having students figure out
problems and search for answers in the activity and in their surroundings. As Fosnot states,
“Students need to ask questions, generate hypotheses, model, test for validity, defend and
discuss ideas” (Fosnot, 2013, 33). and I attempt to provide that opportunity. Scaffolding is
present throughout the lesson as minimal information is presented and at each stage, the
students are guided through question and review on the next step forward to proceed in the
activities in their success. “More recently, the concept of scaffolding has been broadened to
include a multitude of different tools and resources that can be used by students to assist them
with instructional activities. These tools can be embedded within multimedia and hypermedia
software to provide students with support while they are using the software.” (Kao, Lehman, &
Cennamo, 1996). An example of the scaffolding I have provided is the video clip introduction to
present the concept, then the concept was thoroughly discussed before questions were posed
to the students. In the next stage of the activity, the students were asked again to answer and
discuss their experiences with social media and targeted advertising. Finally, the activity to
complete the lesson is for students to seek out these targeted advertisements to which they
should have come to a relatively strong understanding through the repeated concepts in our
prior activities.
Conclusion
Prior to becoming a teacher, I understood education as the simple task of question and answer.
However, through the production of this lesson plan and continued activities in constructivism, I
have learned that there are layers to education and they need to be peeled back one at a time. The
quote by Krahenbuhl, "students are not experts – they need extensive opportunities to develop
background knowledge and scaffold to even remotely engage in these “expert” skills in a way
that contributes positively to their development. Factual knowledge is not an enemy of higher
order thinking rather it is closely related to, and indeed, a necessary precondition to allow these
skills to occur (Christoloudou 2014)" (Krahenbuhl 2016 P.101). resounds in memory for me as I
remembered my childhood education development was a difficult process in which I am thankful
for the diversity in learning opportunities my teachers have posed for me. If I had to choose one
concept to summarize this lesson plan, I’d choose the one in collaboration. “As ideas are shared
within a community, the ‘surround’ may intensify individual cognitive activity. Multiple
perspectives may offer a new set of correspondences, and at times even contradictions to
individual constructions.” (Fosnot, 2013, P. 22.) Collaboration is the foundation to several skills
and can incorporate countless levels of constructivist strategies.
References:
Brush, T. & Saye, J. (2002) A Summary of Research Exploring Hard and Soft Scaffolding for
Teachers and Students Using a Multimedia Supported Learning Environment. The
Journal of Interactive Online Learning. Retrieved from
http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/1.2.3.pdf (Links to an external site.)
Fosnot, C. T. Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives and Practice, 2nd Edition. Teachers College
Press, 03/2015. VitalBook file.
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Educational implications of the theory of multiple
intelligences. Educational researcher, 18(8), 4-10.
Pritchard, Duncan. What is this thing called Knowledge? (What Is This Thing Called?) (p. 13).
Taylor and Francis. Kindle Edition.
Murdoch, K. (2005). Take a moment: 40 frameworks for reflective thinking. Australia: Seastar
Education Consulting
So, W. WM. (2002). Constructivist teaching in primary science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science
Learning and Teaching, 3(1).
Sunal, D. W (n.d.) The learning cycle: A comparison of models of strategies for conceptual
reconstruction: A review of the literature. Retrieved
from http://web.archive.org/web/20160426173157/http://astlc.ua.edu/ScienceInElem&Mi
ddleSchool/565LearningCycle-ComparingModels.htm (Links to an external site.)Links to
an external site. (Links to an external site.)
Name: Derek Wong
Period:
Room#:
School Advisor:
• Ideating:
• Generate ideas to create a range of possibilities
and add
to others’ ideas in ways that create
additional
possibilities
• Hook:
7 mins
Play video of Derren Brown –
Subliminal
Advertising
(https://www.youtube.com/wa
tch?v=ZyQjr1YL0zg )
• Introduction:
X`x`
Debrief the Derren Brown video
7 mins
Exploration:
15 mins
• Debrief the exercise and ask the
students to
share their findings
• Debrief of activities
• Review at the beginning of next class