Sunteți pe pagina 1din 1

Concerns and risks affecting project performance within the Infrastructure and

Property sectors of Turner and Townsend

Financial Customer / Client Internal Processes Learning and Growth

Poor cost management and contol Not meeting clients’ requirements Ineffective risk management processes Lack of effective communication
Late rises in project cost; overcharging for properties; Requirements unclear, unrealistic, or cannot be funded; and knowledge sharing
Cost, scope and schedule implications for projects due to poor
no inflation included in cost management; optimistic issues with consultants’ invoice payments - clients not SIlo working - poor work relationships; teams located in
risk management; having a poor risk management strategy
cost estimations; inappropriate contracting; project seeing the work done, which may lead to loss of remote branches; lack of cultural exposure; lack of
and processes in place.
changes; inadequate cost reporting / capture processes. consultants and suppliers. knowledge sharing - “we don’t know what we know”;
people not developing skills and knowledge.
Substandard stakeholder engagement and
Changing market conditions Reputational losses communication Insufficient processing of lessons
Currency fluctuation, inflation, post-Brexit financial Turner and Townsend being blamed for client’s Lack of internal and external engagement; dissatisfied local learned
situation; availability of contractors; cost increases project being delayed; Turner and Townsend being community; incorrect decisions made due to poor engagement; Lack of capturing, saving and implementing data; “ loss
affecting project feasibility; lack of service demand; tarnieshed in temrs of political credibility and fatality delays in projects due to poor engagement. of opportunities; loss of experience and knowledge; lack
cash flow issues; dips in housing prices. within the industry; loss of reputation due to not of project post-mortem;
meeting project benefits. Poor reporting and control processes
Inefffective internal and external communication of current
proceedings; lack of reporting detail; poor grammar and
Scope creep Clients lacking commercial and health punctuation in reporting - bad impression on the client. Lack of team culture - project team
Interfacing with other projects; inability to provide and safety controls not working coherently
project fit for purpose; new scope coming in and The company being blamed for not providing Miscommunication among staff; negative working
scope gaps; defective work not meeting quality commercial controls, which affects strategy and atmosphere; lack of learning and development of young
Staff unaware of difference between
standards entering scope, and incurring reputational specific services provided to client; fatality of member members; poor diversity and equality; silo working; lack
data and information
damage. of staff; damage to client’s or 3rd party infrastructure. Production of inadequate reports affecting the work of the of innovation and wide thinking in problem solving.
company and the clients; data and reports produced leading to
unsafe decisions (commercial or health and safety related).
Unrealistic scope and cost expecattions on Client satisfaction / retention / attraction Training and development
behalf of client Clients’ expectations not aligned with reality; struggling Staying current with new techniques; ensuring that the
Project becoming non-viable; extreme cost impacts to agree on fees; struggling to agree on scope; Lack of consistent use of tools right people get the right training; developing graduates
(over £5mill.); client contract termination; clients in competition; demonstrating added value; quality of into the company’s culture; lack of funding for training;
Waste of money on “re-inventing the wheel”; reputational
new envoronments; resistance to change. service below expectation; being too pushy with client. lack of training plan in place; lack of competency in team;
damage as a result of producing inconsistent results;
inconsistent behaviour in approach to client.
production of substandard, low quality outputs.

Demonstrating value for money Inexperienced, difficult and Team motivation and dynamics
cost-driven clients
Not being perceived as providing services that add Unclear business offerings from Lack of adequate leadership for boosting team morale
Foreign client unfamiliar with UK regulations; curren- Turner and Townsend
value for money to client; lack of trust in working with cy-related issues for foreign clients; continuous and motivation; lack of work recognition; lack of
client; integrity and reputation. Inability to produce the service that the client needs; inability to opportunities and new commissions; inadequate
value-engineering; failure in procurement of consultants, develop an effective business strategy for offering; inability to
low standards for products. renumeration and benefits; time waste; poor results.
complete promisses to parties due to lack of clarity in offers.

External influences Clients unaware of full range of Overexposure of young team members
services that the company provides Health and safety
Late rises in project cost; overcharging for properties; Negative development of team members due to a lack of
no inflation included in cost management; optimistic Issues with health and safety resource competency; issues
Lack of internal knowledge of full range of organisational confidence; exposing inexperienced team members to
cost estimations; inappropriate contracting; project with contractual obligations; issues with briefing and
services; clients not approaching company; losing work. unnecessary pressure; “missing cogs in the machine” -
changes; inadequate cost reporting / capture processes communication.
negative effects on the output of projects.

S-ar putea să vă placă și