Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ABSTRACT
With the rapid development of national economy in Chennai, imbalance between supply
and demand of traffic infrastructures becomes more and more acute, traffic block becomes
even more serious, and one of causes is confliction of pedestrian and motor vehicle.
Nowadays, pedestrian bridge is an important measure of resolving traffic problems to
form people-oriented walk traffic system in Chennai. Building pedestrian bridge is to
separate pedestrian from motor vehicle in space, resolve traffic congestion of main road,
closely connect pedestrian bridge with subway, sidewalk, shopping promenade, urban
residential area and square to perfect walk traffic system and improve trip environment.
Certainly, multilevel, multifunctional and multi-implied public space is created besides
traffic function of pedestrian bridge, but its traffic function is the primary function now a
days. The city pedestrian bridge will only work if it is rationally construction. Among the
many factors contributing to the success of the pedestrian bridge construction, the more
important one is general layout. To overcome economic constraints, economical design
methods are adopted using economically efficient products. To overcome Sustainability
constraints, these constraints high performance concrete is used for the construction if
applicable. Manufacturability constraints: This can include redesigning of product to
reduce the number of parts, simplify fabrication, or utilize common parts and materials.
Table 1. The Axial force of different nodal points is as follows which was represented
Axial Force Moment-Y (k- Moment-Z
Beam L/C Section Shear-Y (k) Shear-Z (kN) Torsion (k-Nm)
(k) Nm) (k-Nm)
1124 1 0.16 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.25 6.01
1124 1 0.08 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.28 6.61
1124 1 0.25 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.23 5.41
1124 1 0.33 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.20 4.81
1124 1 0.41 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.17 4.21
1124 1 0.5 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.15 3.60
1124 1 0.58 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.12 3.00
1124 1 0.66 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.10 2.40
1124 1 0.75 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.07 1.80
1124 1 0.83 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.05 1.20
1124 1 0.91 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0.02 0.60
1124 1 1 483.80 0.82 -0.03 0 0 0
1277 NAIK ET AL.
Table 2. Axial force tabular column is here
Axial Shear-Y Moment-Y (k- Moment-Z (k-
Beam L/C Section Shear-Z (k-N) Torsion (k-Nm)
Force (k) (k) Nm) Nm)
1124 1 1 181.1 0.03 -0.01 0 0 0
1125 1 1 181.0 -0.03 -0.01 0 0 0
1124 1 0.91 180.2 0.03 -0.01 0 0 0.02
1125 1 0.91 180.1 -0.03 -0.01 0 0 -0.02
1124 1 0.83 179.2 0.03 -0.01 0 0.01 0.04
1125 1 0.83 179.2 -0.03 -0.01 0 0.01 -0.04
1124 1 0.75 178.3 0.03 -0.01 0 0.02 0.06
1125 1 0.75 178.2 -0.03 -0.01 0 0.02 -0.06
1124 1 0.66 177.4 0.03 -0.01 0 0.02 0.08
1125 1 0.66 177.3 -0.03 -0.01 0 0.03 -0.08
1124 1 0.58 176.4 0.03 -0.01 0 0.03 0.11
1125 1 0.58 176.4 -0.03 -0.01 0 0.04 -0.11
1124 1 0.5 175.5 0.03 -0.01 0 0.04 0.13
1125 1 0.5 175.5 -0.03 -0.01 0 0.04 -0.13
The values of axial force of different section and • Design of steel beam
it as follows Table 2 and (Fig. 9-12).
• Design of stair case
• Design of gusset plate
COMPARISION OF BOTH STRUCTURES
Since wind turbine plays a key role in the
structure first we will see the installions and
advantages of turbine.
Installations
Fig. 9 Detailed diagram for steel beam. The wind turbine installation will be taken
place according to type of axis i.e., either horizontal
axis or vertical axis.
Turbine
There are two types of turbines in general, one
among that is a vertical axis wind turbine, and this
Fig. 10 Detailed diagram of stair case. is taken into consideration because of economic and
low maintenance.
VAWT is the most popular of the turbines that
people are adding to make their home a source of
renewable energy. Vertical Axis Wind Turbines
are designed to be economical and practical, as
well as quiet and efficient. They are great for use in
residential areas.
Advantages
Fig. 11 Detailed diagram of gusset plate.
• Since VAWT are mounted closer to the
ground they make maintenance easier, reduce the
construction costs, are more bird friendly and does
not destroy the wildlife.
• You do not need any mechanisms in order to
operate the wind turbine
• Lower wind start-up speed
Fig. 12 Gusset plate thickness. • The main advantage of VAWT is it does not
STABILIZATION OF TALL BUILDING AGAINST THE WIND LOAD 1278
need to be pointed towards the wind to be effective. 808- 1989; IS: 80-2007; IS 456- 2000; IRC 006; IRC SP
In other words, they can be used on the sites with 075; IRC 084).
high variable wind direction.
• You can use the wind turbine where tall
structures are not allowed.
• VAWT’s are quiet, efficient, economical and
perfect for residential energy production, especially
in urban environments.
Fig. 13 Deflection result for composite critical beam.
• Valuable protection and extra durability.
Table 3. The various deflections for different spans of the
Piezoelectric materials and solar panels critical beam is as follows
• In this project, we are generating electrical Distance (m) Displacement(mm)
power as a non-conventional method by simply 0 0
walking or running on the foot step. 0.72666669 0.055
1.45333338 0.108
• Converting mechanical energy to electrical
2.18000007 0.157
energy.
2.90666676 0.202
• It uses the piezoelectric sensor. 3.63333344 0.24
4.36000013 0.269
• Solar panel refers to a panel designed to
5.08666682 0.288
absorb the sun's rays as a source of energy for
5.81333351 0.296
generating electricity or heating.
6.5400002 0.289
Piezoelectric Sensor 7.26666689 0.268
7.99333358 0.229
A piezoelectric sensor is a device that uses the
8.72000027 0.172
piezoelectric effect to measure pressure, acceleration,
strain or force by converting them to an electrical
signal.
Applications
• Footstep generated power can be used for
various purpose like street lights etc.
Fig. 14 Deflection result for steel critical beam.
• It can be used in emergency power failure
situations. Table 4. The deflection values of beam 5 at different spans
are shown
Advantages
Distance (m) Displacement (mm)
• Reliable, Economical, Eco-Friendly 0 0
0.72666669 0.022
• Less consumption of non-renewable
1.45333338 0.042
energies, free of noise and no vibration.
2.18000007 0.062
• Self-generating – no external power required. 2.90666676 0.08
3.63333344 0.096
Comparison of both structures
4.36000013 0.109
Here, the deflection and bending shear for the 5.08666682 0.118
critical beam. 5.81333351 0.123
6.5400002 0.124
From the STAAD Pro analysis, beam number 5 7.26666689 0.119
has maximum deflection (Fig. 13) and Table 3. 7.99333358 0.108
The maximum deflection for steel shown below 8.72000027 0.091
in (Fig. 14) and Table 4. The maximum bending and shear for steel have
Here, the deflection for steel is less when shown below. Considering shear since wind turbine
compared with composite structure. So, by terms of is placed below the deck slab the vibrations will be
deflection we can clearly say steel is preferred (IS: high but we can restrict by using Vertical axis turbine.
STABILIZATION OF TALL BUILDING AGAINST THE WIND LOAD 1279
The following (Fig. 15) shows the shear bending compared with composite structure. So, by terms of
for composite structure Table 5. deflection clearly steel is preferred.
CONCLUSION
• After completing the analysis, design of both
the structures a comparison between bending and
shear has been noted.
• Analysis and designing of real - time
Fig. 15 Shear bending result for composite.
structure and design constraints.
Table 5. The values for shear bending at different spans • Outcome in proper design and analysis, so
Distance (m) Mz (k-Nm) that the strength of the structure has been determined
0 0 (composite/steel).
0.72666669 -0.258 • Considering all the constraints Steel Bridge
1.45333338 -0.516 is more suitable in terms of Economic, Sustainability
2.18000007 -0.774
and Manufacturability.
2.90666676 -1.032
3.63333344 -1.29 • This can be future of generating the electricity
4.36000013 -1.548 by using natural sources.
5.08666682 -1.806
• Additional beneficiary aspects like escalators
5.81333351 -2.064
can be added for the future scope.
6.5400002 -2.322
7.26666689 -2.58 • Steel bridge is more preferable in terms of
7.99333358 -2.838 cost wise and strength wise.
8.72000027 -3.096
• Most economical design methods are
Now for the steel structure, considering dead adopted using economically efficient products.
load the shear bending for the critical section is as • High performance concrete is used for the
follow in the (Fig. 16) and Table 6. construction purpose if applicable to overcome
sustainability constraints.
• Knowledge regarding natural energy and its
effective use.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors wish to thank the SRM University
Fig. 16 Shear bending result for steel. Management, for their support to complete this study
and those who were directly or indirectly involved
Table 6. Values for different spans of shear bending is as in this study. Also thanks Dr. K. S. Satyanarayanan,
follows Professor, Civil, SRM University for his help in
Distance (m) Fy (kN) Mz (kNm) reviews of this research works during its progress.
0 0.122 0 REFERENCES
0.72666669 0.122 -0.089
1.45333338 0.122 -0.177 Amgalan, E., Tsevegmid, T., Jigjjav, M., Jamba, K.,
2.18000007 0.122 -0.266
Ichinnorov, B. and Nergui, M. (2013). Improving
pedestrians safety by using the traffic conflict
2.90666676 0.122 -0.355
analysis technique. IEEE.
3.63333344 0.122 -0.444
4.36000013 0.122 -0.532 Ayyadurai, L., Palani, S. and Prem, D. (2013).
5.08666682 0.122 -0.621 Designing of highway windmill. International
5.81333351 0.122 -0.71 Journal of Advanced Electrical and Electronics
Engineering. 2(3).
6.5400002 0.122 -0.799
7.26666689 0.122 -0.887 Banerjee, A. and Prozzi. J. (2012). Highway
7.99333358 0.122 -0.976 damage due to moment of wind turbine
8.72000027 0.122 -1.065 components,Abstracts of the 31st Southern
African Transport Conference (SATC 2012) 9-12
Here, the deflection for steel is less when July Proceedings, Pretoria, South Africa.
STABILIZATION OF TALL BUILDING AGAINST THE WIND LOAD 1280
Hassan, M.A. and Vijaya Vittala, C.B. (2014). Analysis city pedestrian bridge. International Conference on
of highway wind energy potential. International Information Management. InnovationManagement
Journal of Engineering Research & Technology and Industrial Engineering.
(IJERT). 3(4).
Mashyal, S. and Anil, T.R. (2014). Design and analysis
IS: 808- 1989. Code of practice for dimensions of of highway windmill electric generation. American
hot rolled steel beam, column, channel and angle Journal of Engineering Research (AJER). 03(7) : 28-32.
sections.
Malave, S.N. and Bhosale, S.P. (2013). Highway wind
IS: 80-2007. Code of practice for general construction turbine (Quite Revolution Turbine). International
in steel.
Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. 6(6)
IS 456- 2000. Code of practice for plain and reinforced : 789-794.
concrete
Maurya, V., Khare, S. and Bajpai, S. (2015). Future
IRC 006. Code of practice for standard specifications scope of wind energy in India. IOSR Journal of
and code of practice for road bridge. Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSR-JEEE).
IRC SP 075. Code of practice for guidelines for 10(1) : 79-83.
retrofitting of steel bridges. Sandovica, G. and Juozapaitis, A. (2012). Analysis
IRC 084. Code of practice for manual for specifications of the behavior of an innovative pedestrian steel
and standards for four lining of highways. bridge. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and
review under responsibility of University of
Koh, W.L. and Zhou, S. (2011). Modelling and
simulation of pedestrian behaviours in crowded Žilina, FCE, Slovakia.
places. ACM Transactions on Modelling and Sharma, M.K. (2012). Assessment of wind energy
Computer Simulation. 21(3). potential from highways. International Journal of
Li, R. and Qing-ning, L.X. (2008). General layout of Engineering Research & Technology. (IJERT). 1(8).