Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Toronto Region
BETWEEN:
RESPONDENT
AND
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
APPLICANT
TAKE NOTICE that the applicant will bring an application at XXXXXX on the XXth DAY OF
XXXXXXX, 20XX, in Court XXXX, FULL COURT ADDRESS for an Order granting a stay of
proceedings.
THE GROUNDS FOR THIS APPLICATION ARE:
��.1 That the Defendant was charged on or about the XXth day of XXXXXXX 20XX with
the offence of OFFENCE AS STADED ON TICKET
��.2 That the Defendant made application for trial as set out in the rules of the Provincial
Offences Act.
��.3 That the Ontario Court of Justice fixed a trial date for the XXth day of XXXXXX
20XX, at COURT ADDRESS.
��.4 That this was the first trial date set for this offence, a Part I proceeding under the
provisions of the Provincial Offences Act.
��.5 That the total time from the issuance of the Offence Notice to the trial date is XX
months and XX days.
--2--
��.1 That the time delay from committal to trial is excessive and unreasonable in a free and
democratic society.
��.1 That the delay in bringing these cases before the court is due to the failure of the
Government of Ontario and the City of Toronto to bring forth matters for trial in a timely
fashion.
��.2 That the Defendant has suffered prima facie prejudice on the matter of substantial delay,
and that the prejudice is inferred and actual from the length of the delay.
��.3 That the City of Toronto, due to its size and magnitude, has no comparable jurisdiction
within the province, and no comparative jurisdictions exist for comparison delay-study or
submission.
��.4 That the Defendant is a "Person Charged" as set out in the Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.
��.5 That the total length of the delay, 12 months and 13 days, is a result of both systemic
delay, and that the Defendant has not waived his rights under this section.
��.6 That the inherent time requirements of this matter are minor, that the investigation was
completed and the charges laid on the date of the offence and that the actions of the Defendant
did not lead to any delay.
STATUTORY PROVISIONS OR RULES UPON WHICH THE APPLICANT PLACES
RELIANCE ARE:
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; in particular, sections 11(b) and 24(1).
--3--
The information and documentation before the court. The Defendant may lead viva voce evidence in
support of this application.
An Order allowing the application and the granting of a stay of the proceedings.
R. v. Morin (1992), 12 CR(4 ) 1, 71 CCC(3 ) 1, 134 NR 321, 8 CRR(2 ) 193, 50 OAC 241, [1992] 1
th rd nd
SCR 771.
--4--
THIS APPLICATION
Telephone: XXXXXXXX
Facsimile: XXXXXXXX
________________________
Signature
Fax: 416-338-7322