Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Members:
Groups 1 & 7
Charisse Jollins Ang
Josiah Frances Buenavista
Maricor Cuerdo
Jan Paul Francia
John Paulo Pineda
Leira Angeli Soberano
Submitted to:
Dr. Arnel Uy
I. General Case Background
A. Rationale
To succeed in today’s marketplace, companies must generate high quality
products or services and have competitive cost structures. Actions taken to create cost
efficiencies require an understanding of the drivers, or underlying causes, of costs and
not just merely recognition of cost predictors. Traditional costing methods usually use
predetermined overhead rates in allocating overhead cost to products and services.
However, there are some alternative methods that executives may use in order to
improve management information and enhance their competitive advantage. One of
these methods is known as Activity Based Costing (ABC). The method allows a more
direct focus on the actions that occur in an organization and the overhead costs that are
created by this actions. If use, ABC can help managers make better decisions about the
design, production, profitability and pricing of products and services.
The case of Greenfield Hills specifically highlights the importance of shifting from
the traditional costing method to ABC in order to generate a more accurate cost
information about their services and in that way, the company will be able to evaluate
their current service offerings and price such services accordingly.
B. Company Profile
Using ABC method is it more suitable in GHA operations and how does it affect
the company’s profitability and sustainability. To move towards an accurate cost
identification and allocation to different cost objects, should the Company adapt an
Activity Based Costing (ABC) or should it retain a straightforward traditional costing?
IV. Objectives
A. Assumptions
Note: Please see Appendix A for the Working Paper of Greenfield Hills Apartments.
Weaknesses Strengths
Under the ABC method, all the overhead cost incurred by the company are
assigned to different activity cost pools. These costs are then assigned to different cost
objects (1 Bedroom, 2 Bedroom, Recreation Centre) using the appropriate cost drivers.
Kindly see the table below for the allocation process.
ACA 2: To retain a straightforward traditional costing.
Under the traditional costing method, the total overhead cost are allocated to
all the cost objects using a single predetermined overhead rate. In this case, the
number of residents as the allocation base.
The decision criteria and weights below aims to serve as a basis in choosing the
best option with regards to the case. This serve as a guide in determining the most
appropriate accounting method that the company may adopt in order to achieve the
objectives mentioned above.
Decision Criteria Weight Rationale
Total 100%
It is believed that the transition from the traditional costing system to Activity-
based costing (ABC) is relatively difficult. But with the objective of arriving to more
accurate costing and more precise breakdown of indirect costs, the Management opt to
take a leap to ABC approach. Below are some of the considerations during the
transition stage: work breakdown, roles and responsibilities of external vendors and
internal resources and the reporting and communication procedures for the transition
period.
X. Reference: