Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CHAPTER I
CONCEPT OF INVESTIGATION
The most basic police functions are the protection of lives and properties and
maintenance of peace and orders. When these fundamental tasks are not fully accomplished,
the third basic job must be undertaken – the investigation process which aims and brings the
violator before a proper court of law.
Indeed, the fundamental principles, guide the officer in the processing of a criminals
case, may be applied with equal effectiveness in such specialized inquiries as employment
applicant screening and security investigations.
Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) is one of the most critical stages of any criminal
investigation. The initial actions taken at the crime scene by the First Responders, Investigators
and SOCO Team members at the outset of the investigation are of such vital importance that
oftentimes their actions would determine the outcome of the investigation. However, while CSI
is the most important stage of the investigation in terms of collecting vital forensic evidence and
information, this initial stage is also often the most chaotic and therefore prone to errors.
1. The Motive – refers to the reason or cause why a person or group of persons will
perpetrate a crime.
2. The Instrumentality – is the means or implement used in the commission of the crime.
3. The Opportunity – consists of the acts of omission and/or commission by a person (the
victim) which enables another person or group of persons (the criminal/s) to perpetrate
the crime.
The word investigate is defines as “to examine and inquire into something
systematically and thoroughly”. The word investigate can be traced back to the Latin word
investigare, meaning “to search into.” Investigare is based on another Latin word, vestigare,
meaning “to track or to trace.” (Dempsey, 29)
Investigation Is an art which deals with the identity and location of the offender and
provide evidence of his guilt through criminal proceedings (Tradio,2001)
Note:
1. Investigation came from the Latin term word “Investigat”, which means “to inquire or to
discover.”
2. Detection – the action or process of identifying the presence of something concealed.
In the performance of his duties, the investigator must seek to establish the six (6)
cardinal points of investigation, namely: what specific offense has been committed; how the
offense was committed; who committed it; where the offense was committed; when it was
committed; and why it was committed.
Note: Criminal investigation is defined as the collection and analysis of facts/truths about
persons, things, places that are subjects of a crime to identify the guilty party, locate the
whereabouts of the guilty party, and provide admissible pieces of evidence to established in the
guilt of parties involved in crime.
IX. Three (3) Constitutional Rights of an Arrested Person under Custodial Investigation:
1. The right to remain silent
2. The right to have a counsel of his / her own choice
3. The right to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation (Tradio,1)
XII. Investigation Management System, defined – It is the over-all strategy applied in order to
achieve the desired outcome of the case being investigated.
- oOo -
CHAPTER II
Jonathan Wild
He was a buckle makes and a brothel operator and a master criminal who became the
London’s most famous thief catcher in 1720s.
Henry Fielding
He founded the Bow Street Runners. This was called London’s first professional police
force and was considered as the foundation of all modern police forces. Henry published a
pamphlet entitled ‘An inquiry into the causes of the late increase of robbers.”
John Fielding
As a younger brother of Henry Fielding, he was appointed as Henry’s personal assistant
in 1750. The blind John was known as the “Blind Beak” and allegedly abled to recognize 3,000
criminals by the sounds of their voices.
Patrick Colquhoun
Patrick Colquhoun published a book known as, “The Commerce and Policing of the
River Thames”. Colquhoun together with Master Mariner John Harriott developed the Marine
Police Force or sometimes known as the Thames River Police. It was said to be England’s first
police force.
England (1833)
Scotland Yard employed the first undercover officer. In USA, the first daytime paid police
department was established in Philadelphia.
Texas Rangers
Texas rangers was organized as the first law enforcement agency with statewide
investigative authority. This is the forerunner of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
Charles Dickens
He was great novelist in which through his story entitled Bleak House, he introduced the
term detective to the English language.
Kate Wayne
He was the first woman detective in the history of criminal investigation; she was hired
by the Pinkerton Agency.
Thomas Byrnes
He was a keen-minded individual who trained his detectives in recognizing individual
criminal techniques. He founded the criminal “modus operandi.” This is a Latin phrase
approximately translated as “Method of Operation.”
Howard Vincent
He headed the newly organized Criminal Investigation Department in Scotland Yard.
Allan Pinkerton
In 1850, he organized the Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency and was appointed as
the first city detective in Chicago. Allan Pinkerton was considered as the America’s foremost
private detective and titled as the America’s Founder of Criminal Investigation.
Flaviano Guerrero
Guerrero is the only Filipino member of the United States Federal Bureau of
Investigation.
- oOo -
CHAPTER III
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR
V. Qualities of an Investigator:
1. Perseverance – Steadfastness, persistence and resolution to bring the desired
conclusion in spite of obstacle connected with the criminal investigation.
2. Endurance – the ability to last physically and mentally, hence, he must have the extra
ordinary physical and mental energy, enduring sleepless nights and tiresome days and
the working knowledge of martial arts and firearms proficiency.
3. Incorruptible honesty and Integrity – in the practice of his/her art, there is the ever
temptations of money, women and drinks, where these are present in every corner
playing tricks of temptations.
4. Intelligence and Wisdom of Solomon – this is very important in order that the
investigator could easily decipher falsehood from truth and separate the grain from the
chaff.
- oOo -
CHAPTER IV
I. INFORMATION – Data gathered by an investigator from other persons including the victim
himself and from:
a. Public records – information gathered from records and files of the Police, other law
enforcement agencies, Company records, Public Hospital records and others.
b. Private records – information gathered from cultivated sources such as paid informants,
bartenders, taxi drivers, and vendors and from the internet such as facebook, and others.
c. Modus Operandi file – information gathered from a CCTV camera, witnesses, and
arrested suspect/s, and from Police and other law enforcement files.
Other definitions:
1. is the mode of operation of the criminals or lawless elements
2. MO means the method of operation.
II. INTERROGATION & INTERVIEW – Interrogation is the skillful questioning of witnesses and
suspects while the interview is the simple questioning of the person who cooperates with the
investigator.
INTERROGATION, defined:
it is the process of obtaining an admission or confession from those suspects
who have committed a crime. It is also the process of questioning the person who is
reluctant to make a full disclosure of information in his possession which is pertinent to the
investigation. (Tradio,30)
A. Qualification of an Interrogator:
1. General Knowledge – general knowledge can be acquired by developing
intellectual curiosity and keen sense of observation.
2. Alertness – interrogator must be constantly alert so that he can analyze the
subject accurately and adopt the technique proper for the occasion. He must be
immediately aware of contradictory information, gaps in the subject’s story and
unexplored leads.
3. Perseverance – patient to obtain accurate and complete information, especially
with uncooperative subjects.
4. Logical Mind – questioning must be logical to make the narration clear.
5. Power of self control – loss of temper results in a neglect of important
details. (Tradio,31)
B. Purposes of Interrogation:
1. To obtain a confession to the crime.
2. To induce the subject to make an admission.
3. To learn the facts and circumstances surrounding the crime.
4. To learn the identity of the accomplices.
5. To develop information which will lead to the recovery of the fruits of the crime.
6. To discover the details of other crimes participated in by the suspect.
C. Before the start of the Interrogation, what should the investigator know?
C1. As to the Offense Itself:
1. Legal nature of the offensive conduct – ex. Physical injury, robbery, etc.
2. Date, time, and place of occurrence.
3. Description of the crime area and of the crime scene itself.
4. The way in which the crime appears to have been committed and the known
details of its commission.
5. Possible motive of its commission.
6. Incriminating factors respecting a particular suspect.
2. Simplicity
a. Medium-size room
b. Bare walls
c. No glaring lights
d. Minimum furniture
3. Seating Arrangement
a. Chair (armless)
b. Table or desk (flat surface wherein the interrogator can write and place the
evidence)
c. Seat of suspect (his back must be facing the door to prevent the interruption of the
person getting inside)
4. Technical Aids – interrogator may allow other person to be present. Person like the
prosecuting officer will have the opportunity to observe the subject and the complainant
as well. The following are the technical aids;
a. Recording Installation – conversation must be recorded.
b. Listening Device – hidden microphone and others.
c. Two-way mirror or one way mirror (Tradio,34)
G. Types of Interrogation:
1. Narrative Type – the interrogator gets the subjects story as narrated.
2. Question and Answer Type – if the subject is tacking, the investigator must wait until
the completion of the narration and then ask questions. (Tradio, 36)
Form of Friendliness:
a. Helpful Advisor – it is like that the interrogator and the subject is friend, then the
subject explains the whole thing to his friend which is the investigator.
b. Sympathetic Brother – the interrogator treat the subject as his older or younger
brother, the purpose is still to obtain confession.
c. Extenuation – the suspect were to give the details of the unfortunate incident, his
friend, the investigator could present the affair in its true light.
d. Shifting the Blame – if the subject commits a crime in the first time, the
investigator maybe able to present the incident that it could be happened to
anyone. A full narration may convince the subject to change their minds.
e. Role of Mutt and Jeff – one investigator will act stiffly and going to waste any
time until the guilty party is punished, while the other will be kind-hearted. The
kind-hearted investigator will plea for the cooperation while the other is away.
L. Classifications of Interrogations:
1. Investigatory Interrogation – is the questioning of a person by police officers in a
routine manner when the investigation has not yet reached the stage where an
accusation can be made. The person being questioned is not in legal custody, and his
or her freedom of movement has not been limited in any significant way.
2. Custodial Interrogation – is the questioning of a person who has been taken into
custody by police officers or has otherwise been deprived of his freedom of
movement. (Brown, 43)
Other definition:
An interview is the questioning of person who is believes to possess knowledge
that is official interest to the investigator. In an interview, the person questioned usually
gives his account of an incident under investigation or offers information concerning a
person being investigated in his own manner and words. (Tradio, 23)
A. Background Interview, defined:
Background interview is the simplest type of interview which concerns itself with
the gathering of information regarding the background of a person.
himself with the background of the witness, plan his interview and when necessary,
prove himself with a checklist of the important points of the future interview.
2. Approach – on the first meeting, with the investigator and the witness, the
investigators should inform the subject of his identity. This is done to avoid
misunderstanding for the future changes of misrepresentation.
3. Warming Up – preliminary subject matter of the conversation must be focused to
warm-up the atmosphere, to promote cordiality and trust with each other. The witness
should be given every opportunity to give a complete account without interruption.
4. Questioning – the interviewer or the investigator should start questioning on points
he wants to elicit. Elements of the offense and his knowledge of the crime should
guide the investigator in his questioning. (Tradio,26)
acquainted with the social behavior and life of gamblers, temperament of storekeeper
and etc.
4. Qualities of sales man, an actor and psychologist – me must possess insight
intelligence and persuasiveness. His speech should be suited to the situation.
(PSBRC, 23)
F. Types of Witness:
1. Primary witness – are individuals who have direct knowledge of the crime in question
or of the suspected perpetrator of the crime.
2. Secondary witness – are individuals who possess information about related events
before or after the crime. Confidential informants or “street sources” are most likely to
be secondary witnesses.(Brandl, 204)
1. The witness providing information for the development of a picture of the perpetrator.
2. The witness viewing mug shot books (collection of photographs of previously arrested
or detained persons).
3. The witness viewing the suspect in a show-up situation during which the suspect is
detained by the police at the scene of the crime or at another place.
4. The witness viewing photographs of the suspect and others in a photo lineup or photo
array.
5. The witness actually viewing the suspect and others in a physical, or live, lineup.
- oOo -
CHAPTER V
I. ADMISSION, defined:
Admission is a self-incriminatory statement by the subject falling short of the
acknowledgement of the guilt. It is the acknowledgement of the fact or circumstances from
which guilt may be inferred. It implicates but does not incriminates. Coupled with circumstances
such as the existence of motive. The admission may provide an inference of guilt. (Tradio,41)
In civil proceedings admission is the facts or part of the case admitted, or taken to be
admitted by parties to an action. Admission made in answer to interrogation. (Curzon,1988)
Admission is also an acknowledgement of a fact or circumstances without accepting
guilt. Guilt maybe inferred in admission. It implicated but does not incriminate. Coupled with
circumstances such as the existence of a motive, the admission may provide an inference of
guilt. (Garcia,43)
Confession Admission
There is declaration of the person (accused) There is a statement of the person (accused)
The accused acknowledged guilt from the The person only agreed on facts or
commission of a crime circumstances of the crime
Guilt is admitted There is no acceptance of guilt
A. Admissibility of Confession:
In order that the confession be admissible in court, it is necessary that such confession
be made by the accused voluntarily. These are the requirements in order confession be
admissible in court of justice;
1. Statement obtained without coercion and free from any force or intimidation.
2. Statement obtained by urging or request was spontaneous or self-induced utterance
of the accused.
3. Statement obtained during an official investigation after the accused was informed of
the nature of the offense, and that of fact might be used as evidence against him at a
trial. (Tradio,42)
C. Classification of Confessions:
1. Voluntary confession – confession made spontaneously by a person, free from any
influencing situations. The person confessing does so freely.
2. Involuntary confession – confession given because of hope, a promise made, fear
of violence or actual violence, torture, or threats.
3. Implied confession – confession in which the defendant does not admit to the crime
verbally. However, guilt is deemed admitted because the defendant places himself at
the mercy of the court and asks for a light sentence for the crime. The guilt is implied
because of the statements made to the court.
4. Indirect confession – a confession that is inferred from the conduct of the defendant,
not by what he says, but by his actions.
5. Judicial confession – a guilty plea or some other similar action or conduct in court
during a judicial proceeding.
6. Interlocking confessions – two or more people are charged with the same crime. All
the parties confess, the confessions are substantially the same, and each is
consistent with the others regarding the major elements of the crime.
After the subject has been sworn, the statement is signed by the subject, the
investigator or the person administering the oath, and the witness.
Section 1. Statement of Policy. – It is the policy of the state to value the dignity of every
human being and guarantee full respect for human rights.
Section 2. Rights of Persons Arrested, Detained, or Under Custodial Investigation; Duties
of Public Officers. – (a) any person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation shall at
all times be assisted by counsel.
(b) Any public officer or employee, or anyone acting under his order or in his place, who
arrests, detained or investigates any person for the commission of an offense shall inform the
latter, in a language known to and understood by him, of his rights to remain silent and to have
competent and independent counsel, preferably of his own choice, who shall at all times be
allowed to confer private with the person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation. If
such person cannot afford the service of his own counsel, he must be provided with competent
and incompetent counsel by the investigation officer.
(c) The custodial investigation report shall be reduced to writing by the investigating
officer; provided that before such report is signed, or thumb marked if the person arrested or
detained does not know how to read and write, it shall be read and adequately explained to him
by his counsel or by the assisting counsel provided by the investigating officer in the language
or dialect known to such arrested or detained person otherwise, such investigation report shall
be null and void and effect whatever.
(d) Any extrajudicial confession made by person arrested, detained or under custodial
investigation shall be in writing and signed by such person in the presence of his counsel or in
the latter’s absence, upon a valid waiver, and in the presence of any of the parents, older
brothers and sisters, his spouse, the municipal mayor, the municipal judge, district school
supervisor, or priest or minister of the gospel as chosen by him, otherwise, such extrajudicial
confession shall be inadmissible as evidence in evidence in any proceeding.
(e) Any waiver by a person arrested or detained under the provisions of Article 125 of
the RPC, or under custodial investigation, shall be in writing and signed by such person in the
presence of his counsel; otherwise such waiver shall be null and void and of no effect.
(f) Any person arrested or detained or under custodial investigation shall be allowed
visits by or conferences with any member of his immediate family, or any medical doctor or
priest or religious minister chosen by him or by any member of his immediate family or by his
counsel, or by any national nongovernmental organization duly accredited by the Commission
on Human Rights or by any international nongovernmental organization duly accredited by the
Office of the President. The person’s immediate family shall include his or her spouse, fiancée,
parent or child, brother or sister, grandparent or grandchild, uncle or aunt, nephew or niece, and
guardian or ward.
As used in this Act, “custodial investigation shall include the practice of issuing an
“invitation” to a person who is investigated in connection with an offense he is suspected to
have committed, without prejudice to the validity of “inviting” officer for any violation of law.
Section 3. Assisting Counsel. –Assisting counsel is any lawyer, except those directly affected
by the case, those charged with conducting preliminary investigation or those charged with the
prosecution of crimes.
The assisting counsel other than the government lawyers shall be entitled to the
following fees:
(a) The amount of One hundred fifty pesos (P150.00) if the suspected person is
chargeable with light felonies;
(b) The amount of Two hundred fifty pesos (P250.00) if the suspected person is
chargeable with less grave or grave felonies;
(c) The amount of Three hundred fifty pesos (P350.00) if the suspected person is
chargeable with capital offenses.
The fee for the assisting counsel shall be paid by city or municipality where the custodial
investigation shall be conducted, provided that if the municipality or city cannot pay such fee,
the province comprising such municipality or city shall pay the fee: Provided, that the
Municipality or City Treasurer must certify that no funds are available to pay the fees of assisting
counsel before the province pays said fees.
In the absence of any lawyer, no custodial investigation shall be conducted and the
suspected person can only be detained by the investigating officer in accordance with the
provision of Article 125 of the RPC.
Section 4. Penalty Clause. –a) Any arresting public officer or employee, or any investigating
officer, who fails to inform any person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation of his
right to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel preferably of his own
choice, shall suffer a fine of Six thousand pesos (6,000.00) or a penalty of imprisonment of not
less than eight (8) years but not more than ten (10) years, or both. The penalty of perpetual
absolute disqualification shall be imposed upon the investigating officer who has been
previously convicted of a similar offense.
The same penalties shall be imposed upon a public officer or employee, or anyone
acting upon orders of such investigating officer or in his place, who fails to provide a competent
and independent counsel to a person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation for the
commission of an offense if the latter cannot afford the services of his own counsel.
b) Any person who obstructs, prevents or prohibits any lawyer, any member of the
immediate family of a person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation, or any medical
doctor or priest or religious minister chosen by him or by any member of his immediate family or
by his counsel, form visiting and conferring privately with him, or form examining and treating
him, or form ministering to his spiritual needs, at any hour of the day or, in urgent cases, of the
night shall suffer the penalty of imprisonment of not less than four (4) years nor more than six
(6) years, and a fine of Four thousand pesos (P4,000.00).
The provisions of the above Section notwithstanding, any security officer with custodial
responsibility over any detainee or prisoner may undertake such reasonable measures as may
be necessary to secure his safety and prevent his escape.
Section 5. Repealing Clause. –Republic Act No. 857, as amended, is hereby repealed.
Otherwise laws, presidential decrees, executive orders or rules and regulations, or parts thereof
inconsistent with the provisions of this Act are repealed or modified accordingly.
Section 6. Effectivity. –This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days following its publication in the
Official Gazette or in any daily newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines.
Approved, April 27, 1992.
- oOo -
CHAPTER VI
I. INFORMANTS, defined:
An informant is a person who gives information to the investigator. He may give the
information openly and even offer to be a witness, or he may inform the investigator
surreptitiously and request to remain anonymous. (Tradio, 46)
An informant is any person who furnished the police information relevant to a criminal
case about the activities of a criminal or syndicates. The informant may openly give the
information or offer he to be a witness. The other kind is, the one who furnished the policeman
information surreptitiously and opts to remain anonymous. (Garcia,35)
A. Types of Informants:
1. Anonymous Informant – He may be an anonymous telephone caller or anonymous
letter writer. If the person seems to have real information, get all the possible fact, but:
a. do not reveal any information you may have by stating that you already know what
is being told to you.
b. do not let your telephone conversation disclose facts which should not leak out.
c. do not let caller press you to reveal facts.
d. do not let the tendency to “show off” or to impress your anonymous caller with
what you already know to get the better of you.
e. do not let your caller find out more from you than you from him.
2. Rival-Elimination Informant – it is usually anonymous. His purpose in informing is to
eliminate rival or competition.
3. False Informant – reveals information usually of no consequence or stuff concocted
of thin air. He may do so out of the desire to appear to be on the side of law and order
and for the purpose of throwing suspicion from himself or his gang or associates.
4. Frightened Informant – maybe prodded by fear or self-interest. He is usually
motivated by anxiety for his own well-being and will furnish information as a protective
device and as a means of sustaining his own feeling of self-importance. This type is
the weakest link in the criminal chain.
5. Self-aggrandizing Informant – Hang about the fringes of the underworld and
delights in surprising the police with choice bits of information. From time to time, his
information maybe of value.
6. Mercenary Informant – has something to sell. He maybe a valuable source.
Sometimes there is a revenge motive present.
The investigator has the duty to protect the identity of the informants, first as the
matter of ethical practice, and second, because of the danger of undermining the
confidence of his source. Moreover, the identity of the informants should not be
disclosed unless necessary to the proper authorities. In order that the informants be still
continue to give information the investigator should follow the general rules regarding
this relationship, these are the following:
The investigator must continuously evaluate his informant. The information received
must be tested for consistency by checking with information obtained from other sources of
persons. The motives and interest should be considered and evaluated. (Tradio, 49)
E. Definition of terms:
- oOo -
CHAPTER VII
I. SURVEILLANCE, defined:
Surveillance is the designated or secret observation of places, persons and vehicles for
the purpose of obtaining information concerning the identities or activities of the subject.
A. Types of Surveillance:
1. Covert Surveillance – when the subject is not aware that he is being observed
2. Overt Surveillance – when the subjects is aware that he is being tailed.(Garcia,58)
B. Purpose of Surveillance:
1. To get information on criminal activities for the future raid
2. To discover the identities of persons frequenting the place to established their criminal
activities
3. To obtain evidence of a crime or to prevent the commission thereof by arrest or raid
4. To establish a legal grounds for the application of a Search Warrant
5. To arrest the criminal in “flagrante delicto” (Garcia,58)
E. Kinds of Surveillance:
1. Surveillance of places
2. Tailing or shadowing
3. Undercover investigation or “roping”
1. SURVEILLANCE OF PLACES:
The crimes which requires this type of surveillance are gambling, abortion, prostitution,
illegal sale of drugs or alcohol, dishonesty among employees or infidelity in a divorce.
(Tradio,55)
2. SHADOWING OR TAILING:
Shadowing or tailing is the act of following a person. (Tradio,57)
A. Purpose of Shadowing:
1. To detect evidences of criminal activities
2. To establish the associations of a suspect
3. To find a wanted person
4. To protect a witness
5. To discover the associations, amusements and habits of an employee who has
been proposed for position of responsibility
6. To check the loyalty of the employee in an establishment where the thefts have
occurred (Tradio,57)
1. If the subject becomes suspicious of any of the operators, that person can
quickly drop out to trial.
2. If suddenly the subject turns in a corner, “A” may continue straight ahead
instead of hurrying to the corner and anxiously looking for the subject. “C”
may then cross the street and follow the subject, thus taking up the “A”
position. “C” moreover, has been in a position to view any sudden
disappearance into the building. (Tradio,60)
D.1. General
D.2. Particular
1. Turning Corners – the surveillant should not rush if the subject turns to a corner.
If the subject disappears, the nature of the surrounding will determine the tactics
to locate the subject. In most cases, it is better to lose the subject than to alert him
of the tailing.
2. Entering a Building – if the building is a store, the surveillant should wait until the
subject comes out. In buildings having a number of exist, it is necessary to follow
him inside. If the subject enters an elevator, the surveillant should board the same
elevator. The surveillant may tell the elevator boy that his destination is the same
floor as the subject. If there are more than one surveillant, one should alight at the
subject’s floor and the other should proceed in a different direction then the latter
can turn to the first floor and wait the subject.
3. Riding a Bus – the surveillant5 should board the same bus, and sit behind or at
the side of the subject. If the shadower misses the bus, he should ride the taxi and
board the bus at a place ahead.
4. Riding a Taxi – if the subject takes a taxi, the shadower should take another taxi
and note the plate number and company name of the subject’s taxi. If he fails to
tail the subject, he should get information from the taxi driver or the company for
the disclosure of the subject’s destination.
5. Riding a Train – the shadower must fall in line towards the ticket booth, behind
the subject so that he could overhead the destination, or he could merely request
for timetable or a ticket for the last destination. .
6. Inside a Theater – the shadower should be seated behind the subject. If the
subject gets out, he should be followed on the different exit points.
7. Inside a Private House – the shadower should wait outside at a distance to be
inconspicuous, taking the address and the occupants to be verified later.
8. Inside a Restaurant – shadower should allow some time before entering the
restaurant, to give the subject the time to select his table. The shadower must
select the obscure table and estimates to finish his meal at the same time as that
of the subject.
9. Telephone Booth – the shadower may take the next booth or stand near the
subject to hear the conversation. The telephone book used and the page number
at which it was left open and should be noted.
10. Inside a Small Private or Public Office – the shadower must wait outside by
pretending to be s customer of nearby establishment.
11. In a Hotel – the room number of the subject could be inquired from the hotel
registry. Once pinpointed, the shadower should take an adjacent or opposite
room. If there are no available room on these arrangement, the nearest vacant
room should be his choice. (Garcia,64-65)
or subway train, and then jumping off the vehicle. The subject then looks about
quickly to determine if any other person jumped off. If the shadower alights too,
the suspect will study him closely to facilitate future recognition. On finding himself
in this predicament, the surveillant’s best tactics is to remain on the vehicle until
the next stop, alights, and board the next car or train.
2. The Convoy – Sometimes the suspect is being guarded against shadowers. The
convoy is usually at the rear of the subject. It may be therefore necessary for the
surveillant to keep a look out behind him to guard against this. If the subject has a
follower or convoy, the shadower must get behind the convoy and follow him
instead of the subject. (Tradio, 61)
Shadowing by Automobile:
In tailing by an automobile, two cars are more effective than one. At least
two people should be assigned in each car. If only car is used, it should follow
the subject at a distance of about one hundred yards. The distance of the
operation will be greater on high ways and less in crowded traffic. If a second car
is used, it should follow at an equal distance behind the first. (Tradio,62)
1. Name – full name, alias and nick names. If he holds a public office, then the name
of the department.
2. Address – past and present, residential and business
3. Description – identity mark, picture and etc.
4. Family and Relatives – an acquaintance with members of the family suggest
another source of information.
5. Associates – knowledge of associates will understand the subject activities.
6. Character and Temperament – the subject strength and weaknesses should be
known.
7. Drug – drug addiction, alcohol, gambling, etc.
8. Hobbies – suggest simple way of developing acquaintance.
9. Education – this knowledge suggests the limitation of the subject and will indicate
the desired level of education in the investigation.
10. Occupation and Specialty – these suggest, against possible meeting ground and
or also indicate of the character of the subject.
3. Subversive Story
1. History and backgrounds of organization. Biography of the official
2. Identity and background of members and former members
3. Methods of identification employed by the members
4. Files and records (nature, location and accessibility)
5. Meeting (schedule and place)
4. Cover Story
A fictitious background and history for the new character of the investigator
should be prepared, including the names, addresses and descriptions of the
assumed places of education, employment, associates, neighborhoods, trade and
travels. The investigator background story is very necessary. It is usually advisable
for the investigator to maintain his reputation that he is from the city wherein he has
lived and which he is well acquainted of. (Tradio,67)
Provision should be made in the cover story for some of the following :
1. Frequent contact with the subject.
2. Freedom of movement and justification for actions.
3. Background that will permit the investigator to maintain a financial and social
status equivalent to that of the subject.
4. Mutual points of interest between the agent and subject.
5. Means of communication with agents superior.
6. Alternate cover story in the event that the original cover story is compromised,
“PLAN B”.
7. A method of leaving the area quickly at the conclusion of the mission.
5. Physical Details
Personal possessions should be obtained foe the undercover investigator which
are appropriate to the character assumed in quality, price, age, fit, degree of
cleanliness; laundry marks and manufacture’s design. Personal possessions may
include; clothes, a pocketbook, a watch, a ring, a suitcase etc.
6. Testing
The investigator should memorize all details in connection with his assumed role
and the fictitious portions of his biography. He should be tested by prolonged
questioning and surprise inquiries.
7. Disclosure of Identity
The investigator should be instructed not to disclose his identity or he should
remain undercover if arrested by the civil authorities. A plan or act should also be laid
out against the contingency of accidental disclosure.
H. Infiltration Operation:
Infiltration involves gaining entry into criminal organizations that sell large
amounts of drugs. The intent of this kind of undercover operation is to buy larger and
larger amounts of drugs in order to reach as high as possible into the organization
hierarchy
B. Appearance of a Surveillant:
1. Average size and height, and built
2. Have no noticeable peculiarities in appearance or mannerism
3. Wear inconspicuous jewelry or clothing
4. Have nothing about him to attract the attention or fix him in the mind of a person
5. Have perseverance and be able to wait for hour at a time without showing any sign of
impatience or irritation, since this attract attention
6. Always give the appearance of attending strictly to his own business and of not being
interested in what anyone else maybe doing
7. Be resourceful, versatile and quick witted , so that he can readily conceive reasons or
excuses for being in any given place
8. Be a good talker, able to talk in his way out of embarrassing situations without
arousing suspicion. Have one or two good standard line such as canvassing for the
city directory or a trade publication or selling brushes or other articles.
9. Have one or two good standard “line” such as canvassing for the city directory or a
trade publication or selling brushes or other articles. (Tradio, 56)
CHAPTER VIII
1. Reactive Investigation
2. Proactive Investigation
1. Reactive Investigation – are the traditional manner in which police become involved in
the investigation of crime. Reactive investigations are often divided into the initial
investigation, & the follow-up investigation.
A. Blending Operations:
The officers dress in civilian clothes to blend into an area and patrol it on foot or
in unmarked police cars in an attempt to catch a criminal in the act of committing a
crime.
B. Stakeout Operations:
A stakeout consists of a group of heavily armed officers who hide in an area of a
store or building waiting for an impending holdup. If an armed robber enter s the store
and attempts a robbery, the officer well “Police!” from their hidden areas; if the
perpetrator fails to drop his weapon, the officers open fire. Stakeouts are effective in
cases where the police receive a tip that a crime is going to occur in a commercial
establishment. (Dempsey,267)
C. Decoy Operation:
The officer’s dress as, and play the role of, potential victims (ex. Drunks, nurses,
tourist etc) waiting to be the subject of a crime. Meanwhile, a team of backup officers
stand by to apprehend the perpetrator in the act of committing the crime..
D. Interdiction:
Interdiction involves the interceptions and seizure of drugs smuggled.
- oOo -
CHAPTER IX
Moreover, the investigator should also consider or give extra care in crime scene
operation, since all the necessary evidence in connection of the crime are there. The evidences
must be in position by the time the suspect leave the scene until the investigator arrives therein.
Furthermore, the investigator places himself at a spot where there are no physical
evidence that will be tampered and comes an estimates and to what form of search will be
employed. From there, he could determine the different angles and views to take the
photographs of the scene.
It also important that the evidence is properly collected, marked, tag and preserved.
might become points of interest to the court when the case is brought to trial.
Experienced investigators employ a notebook to record the relevant details of the case.
During trial, the court allows investigators to consult their notes to refresh their memory.
B. Recording Note: The data of the investigation should be recorded in a complete,
accurate and legible fashion so that in the event another investigator is required to
assume responsibility for the investigation, he can make intelligent use of the notebook.
A. Purpose
This investigative procedure is designed to adapt to the current trends in modern
investigation, in line with the PNP Integrated Transformation Program which seeks to
improve and integrate the different manuals used by the PNP to serve as guide in all
aspects of police investigation.
It also aims to come up with a definite investigative procedure on specific cases from the
time the incident happened, until the case is filed, which will be adopted by the PNP
investigators in pursuing their mandated tasks.
B. Procedures
a. If in serious condition:
1. Bring the victim immediately to the nearest hospital using emergency services;
2. Photograph and make a sketch of the victim (if the victim is dead);
3. Get the dying declaration; if necessary (ask 3 questions)
a) Ano ang pangalan at address mo?
b) Kilala mo ba ang gumawa nito sa iyo?
c) Sa pakiramdam mo ba ay ikamamatay mo ang tinamo mong sugat?
However, if there is still a chance to ask more questions, then follow-up should
be done. The statement, once reduced into writing, shall be duly signed by or with thumb
mark of the victim.
2. Isolate the arrested suspect/s and separate them from any probable witness of the
incident.
3. Record what time the suspect was arrested.
4. Wait for the investigator to interview the suspect.
5. If the suspect volunteers any statement, take note of the time, location and
circumstances of the statements.
d. Other Considerations:
1. Recording of pertinent information such as time, date and place of incident, weather
condition, names and addresses of witnesses.
2. Note the position of the victim upon arrival/discovery of the victim.
3. Take notes the identity of person/s who entered the crime scene prior to the arrival of
the investigator and the SOCO.
Note: The other member/s of the first responders shall remain at the crime scene to
secure the premises.
removing the victim, mark, sketch and photograph his/her relative position. Only a
coroner or a medical examiner shall remove the dead body unless unusual
circumstances justify its immediate removal.
6. Designate a member of the team or ask other policemen or responsible persons to
stand watch and secure the scene, and permit only authorized persons to enter
the same.
7. Identify and retain for questioning the person who first notified the police, and
other possible witnesses.
8. Determine the assailant through inquiry or observe him if his identity is
immediately apparent. Arrest him if he is still in the vicinity.
9. Separate witnesses in order to get independent statements.
E.2 Recording:
The investigator begins the process of recording pertinent facts and details of the
investigation the moment he arrives at the crime scene. (He should record the time when
he was initially notified prior to his arrival). He also writes down the identification of
persons involved and what he initially saw. He also draws a basic sketch of the crime
scene and takes the initial photograph (if a photographer is available, avail his services).
This is to ensure that an image of the crime scene is recorded before any occurrence
that disturbs the scene. As a rule, do not touch, alter or remove anything at the crime
scene until the evidence has been processed through notes, sketches and photograph,
with proper measurements.
8. Treat as evidence all other items, such as hairs, fibers, and earth particles foreign
to the area in which they are found; for example, matter found under the victims
fingerprints.
9. Proceed systematically and uninterruptedly to the conclusion of the processing of
the scene. The search for evidence is initially completed when, after a thorough
examination of the scene, the rough sketch, necessary photograph and
investigative notes have been completed and the investigator has returned to the
point from which the search began.
10. Further search may be necessary after the evidence and the statements
obtained have been evaluated.
11. In large outdoor areas, it is advisable to divide the area into strips about four (4)
feet wide. The policeman may first search the strip on his left as he faces the
scene and then the adjoining strips.
12. It may be advisable to make a search beyond the area considered to be the
immediate scene of the incident or crime. For example, evidence may indicate
that a weapon or tool used in the crime was discarded or hidden by the offender
somewhere within a square-mile area near the scene.
13. After completing the search of the scene, the investigator examines the object or
person actually attacked by the offender. For example, a ripped safe, a desk
drawer that has been pried open or a room from which items has been stolen,
would be processed after the remainder of the scene has been examined for
traces of the offender.
14. In a homicide case, the position of the victim should be outlined with a chalk or
any other suitable material before the body is removed from the scene. If the
victim has been pronounced dead by a doctor or is obviously dead, it is usually
advisable to examine the body, the clothing and the area under the body after the
remainder of the scene has been searched. This is to enable the
policeman/investigator to evaluate all objects of special interest in the light of all
other evidence found at the scene.
G. Chalkline, defined:
The immediate representation of the object at the crime scene (CIC)
e. CSI Form “5” – (Release of Crime Scene Form) This shall be accomplished by the
IOC or the COP and witnessed by the SOCO Team Leader and conformed by the
owner of the property or representative of the local authority. A copy of the crime
scene release form shall be provided to the owner. (See Annex F)
f. CSI Form “6” – (IOC/Investigator’s CSI Form) This shall be accomplished by the IOC
at the OSCP prior to the lifting of the security cordon. (See Annex G)
- oOo -
CHAPTER X
METHODS OF SEARCH
A. Strip Method – In this method, the area is blocked out in the form of a rectangle. The three
(3) Searchers A, B, and C, proceed slowly at the same pace along paths parallel to one side
of the rectangle. When a piece of evidence is found, the finder announces his discovery and
the search must stop until the evidence has been cared for. A photographer is called, if
necessary. The evidence is collected and tagged and the search proceeds at a given signal.
At the end of the rectangle, the searchers turn and proceed along new lanes as shown in the
above illustration.
Figure 01
B. Double Strip or Grid Method - The double strip or grid method of search is a modification of
the Strip Search Method. Here, the rectangle is traversed first parallel to the base then
parallel to a side.
Figure 02
C. Spiral or Circular Method – the searches follow each other in a path of spiral, beginning on
the outside and spiraling toward the center of the scene. See figure 03 (Tradio,7)
Figure 03
D. Zone Method – the area subject to be search is divided into quadrants and each one
searches assigned into a specific quadrant. This method sometimes called as the Quadrant
Method. See figure 04 (Tradio,7)
Figure 04
E. Wheel Method – this method is applied if the area to be searched is approximately circular
or oval. The searches gather at the center and proceed outward a radii or spokes. The
setback of this method is that the distances of the searches increases as they proceed
outward. See figure 05 (Horgan,54)
Figure 05
End
Start
CHAPTER XI
- oOo -
CHAPTER XII
1. R. A. No. 6975 as amended by R.A. No. 8551 (PNP Law). This law placed the PNP Crime
Laboratory as an Operational Support Unit. Formerly, under the PC/INP, the Crime
laboratory was an Administrative Support Unit. Because of the new set up, the Crime
Laboratory established the so-called Scene of the Crime Operation. (SOCO) which is a field
operation.
2. The SOCO now conducts field operation when responding to the scene of crime. As such, it
is entitled to operational funds. This is an innovation because the SOCO now gathers all
evidence at the scene of the crime and takes custody of them, marking and tagging them.
This procedure arrogates unto itself the otherwise duty of the criminal investigator at the
scene of the crime. Even those that are not subject to laboratory examinations are taken by
the SOCO.
3. The SOCO makes its own reconstruction of the crime and the formulation of theories which
are basically the duty of the criminal investigator. At times, the SOCO members conduct
their own field of inquiry by questioning people at the scene, a duty which does not belong to
it. Worst, the SOCO release their reconstruction of the crime and its theories to the press.
The duty of the SOCO is to scientifically analyze physical evidence at the scene thru the
expertise of their laboratory technicians.
4. The SOCO has emerged as an independent operational unit, instead of lending of
administrative support to the criminal investigator or investigative units.
5. The SOCO members at the scene must be placed under the operational control of the
criminal investigator because this is the practice for very long time.
6. The initial findings of the SOCO at the crime scene should be immediately given to the
criminal investigator so that he can intelligently and immediately facilitate the fast solution of
the case. The criminal investigator could immediately formulate the correct theory as the
path for the solution of the crime. What is happening is that the initial findings are being kept
by SOCO because of impractical administrative procedure where there is need for a Chief of
the SOCO for the approval of such release to the criminal investigator.
7. It is reported that in many occasions, the SOCO arrives earlier than the criminal investigator
at the crime scene. Without waiting for the criminal investigator, the SOCO immediately
conducts the processing of the crime scene. This would result to the situation where the
criminal investigator is denied the opportunity to form a perspective as to the original
positions of the phy7sical evidence at the scene. This would result to a wrong reconstruction
of the crime and formulation of theories.
8. Usually the SOCO team is headed by a commissioned officer who outranks the criminal
investigator. This would violate the rule that the criminal investigator is the authority at the
scene and he could exclude even ranking police officers that will enter the police line.
9. The SOCO release to the press its findings even before their official report reaches the
criminal investigator. These laboratory reports are confidential in nature and they could only
be released by the investigator when finally the case is brought before the Inquest Officer or
the case is filed with the Prosecution Office. If the SOCO maintains its independence and
authority over the criminal investigator, it is violative of the sound procedures in Criminal
Investigation.
II. Result
1. Delay in the solution of the case. When the vital scientific evidence is delayed in its
transmission to the criminal investigator, it will result to unnecessary delay in the
solution of the crime. Element of time is of the essence in arresting of the offender on
the basis of scientific findings.
2. Bungling of case. When laboratory findings are released on the media by the SOCO, it
would provide an opportunity for the would-be suspect who is forewarned, to move ahead
of the investigator and in the process, other pieces of evidence in the possession of the
suspect or pieces of evidence in the possession of the suspect or other persons will be
subject to destruction or suppression. Element of surprise by the criminal investigator is
forever lost.
3. Initiative of the investigator will be damped. When the investigator loses his authority at the
crime scene or the releases to the media of scientific findings even before the filling of the
case with the Prosecutor, his idealistic interest to pursue vigorously the solution of the
crime is damped. When the case solution is delayed, there will be shifting of blames
between the investigator and the SOCO.
1. Significant Cases:
a) Bombing Incident f) Financial institution
b) Initiated terrorist activities g) Calamity/Disaster
c) Raids, ambuscade, liquidation h) Massacre
d) KFR case (Kidnap-for-Ransom) i)Heinous crimes (as defined by law)
e) Armed Robbery of Banks and other j) Murder, Homicide, Arson, Rape
with Homicide
2. Sensational Cases:
a) Elected Public Officials (Brgy Captain up to President of the RP)
b) Appointed public officials with the rank of commissioner, secretary and
undersecretary
c) Foreign diplomat
d) Any foreigner
e) PNP/AFP personnel
f) Former high-ranking government officials
g) Other prominent figures such as movie stars, sports stars, tri-media practitioners,
prominent businessmen, professionals, and prominent leaders of religious
organizations.
- oOo -
CHAPTER XII
The sketch is the simpliest and the most effective way of showing actual measurements
and of identifying significant items of evidence in their location at the scene. Sketching is
supplementary to photography. (Tradio, 11)
One of the essential parts in investigation is sketching the crime scene, this procedure
aids investigator in getting to the bottom of the case and bring the investigator close to the vital
leads.
Sketches are useful in the questioning of witness and suspect or writing of investigative
reports. Sketches are also excellent companions to photographs. Where photograph provide
exacting details, sketches offer accurate information about the placement of object, and the
show relationship and distance between things. Sketches can be used to refresh an
investigator’s memory; to reflect the relationship of objects to the surroundings of object to the
area; to help the prosecutor, judge, and injury understand condition at the crime scene, and to
supplement photographs of the scene.
I. Sketch, defined:
It is the graphical representation of the scene of the crime. With complete measurements
of the relative distances of relevant objects and condition obtaining therein. (Garcia,11)
ELEVATION SKETCH
(South Side Wall)
Figure 06
1. Triangulation Method
2. Coordinate or Angular Method
3. Baseline Method
4. Compass Point Method
5. Grid Method
5. Grid Method
- oOo -
CHAPTER XIV
FIELD INQUIRY
Gait – A person, on account of disease or some inborn traits may show a characteristic
manner of walking.
a. Broad daylight:
A person can hardly recognized another person at a distance farther than 100
yards if the person has never been seen before, but persons who are almost strangers
may be recognized at a distance of 25 yards
b. Flash of firearm:
By experiment, letters of 2 inches high can be read with the aid of the flash of a
caliber .22 firearm at a distance of 2 feet it is hardly possible for a witness to see the
assailant in case of a hold-up or a murder:
c. Flash of Lightning:
The flash of lightning produces sufficient light for the identification of an individual
provided that the person’s eye is focused towards the individual he wishes to identify
during the flash.
d. Artificial Light:
The identity is relative to the kind and intensity of the light.
4. The suspect must be given the opportunity to select their position in the line-up.
5. The line-up members are not allowed to talk during the process or make any
movement which may suggest the identity of the suspect.
6. The proceedings must be covered by a detailed report and possibly by a movie
camera for Court presentation. (Garcia,23)
1. Face – shape, forehead, eyebrow, mustache, eyes, ears, cheeks, nose, mouth, jaw,
lips, teeth and chin.
2. Hairs – curly, straight, short, few,
3. Neck
4. Shoulder
5. Waist
6. Hands
7. Fingers
8. Manner of Walking
9. Voice
10. Mannerism
11. Physical Appearance – Asian, American, Caucasian, etc
12. Complexion (Garcia,22)
- oOo -
CHAPTER XV
C. Execution of warrant:
The head of the office to whom the warrant of arrest was delivered for execution shall
cause the warrant to be executed within ten (10) days from its receipt. Within ten (10) days
after the expiration of the period, the officer to whom it was assigned for execution shall
make a report to the judge who issued the warrant. In case of his failure to execute the
warrant, he shall state the reason therefore.
1. However, Sec. 4 of Rule 113 requires the head of the office who applied for warrant to
execute the same within 10 days from receipt thereof and for the arresting officer
assigned to execute the same to submit, within 10 days from the expiration of the first
10-day period, a report to the judge who issued the warrant.
2. The rule does not require a return of the warrant of arrest but only a report to the
Judge who issued the warrant and, in case of officers failure to execute the same shall
state the reasons therefore.
3. It does not become stale or factus oficio unlike a search warrant which is valid only for
ten days. A warrant of arrest remains valid until arrest is effected or the warrant lifted.
B. Seizure, defined:
Seizure is the taking into custody of property found by searching.
I. Kinds of Search:
1. Preliminary Search of a Person – this is ordinarily made at the time and scene of
arrest. Its primary purposes are:
a. to discover concealed weapons; and
b. Seizure of incriminating evidence which might otherwise be destroyed.
2. Complete Search – this is done at the place of detention wherein the subject is
stripped and clothings and other possessions are thoroughly examined.
III. ENTRAPMENT
Entrapment, defined:
Entrapment Defined as inducing an individual to commit a crime he or she did not
contemplate, for the sole purpose of instituting a criminal prosecution against the offender.
(Dempsey,191)
Entrapment also the act of tricking somebody into committing a crime in order to
obtain a prosecution. Inducement is the key word; when police encouragement plays upon
the weaknesses of innocent person and beguiles them into committing crimes they normally
would not attempt, it can be deemed improper as entrapment.
The police, who give a person the opportunity to commit a crime, are not guilty of
entrapment. (Dempsey,190)
- oOo -
CHAPTER XVI
1. Corpus Delicti – objects or substances which are essentials parts of the body of the
crime.
2. Associative Evidence – Evidence which links the suspects to the crime scene or
offense. Ex. Fingerprints and shoe impressions
3. Tracing Evidence – Articles which assist the investigator on locating the suspect.
(Tradio,13)
V. Collection of Evidence
This is accomplished after the search is completed, the rough sketch finished and
photographs taken. Fragile evidence should be collected as they are found. All firearms
(FAs) found to have tampered serial numbers (SNs) shall be automatically subjected to
macro etching at the Philippine National Police Crime Laboratory (PNP-CL). A
corresponding request to the Firearms and Explosive Office (FEO) must be made for
verification purposes.
The investigator places his initials, the date and time of discovery on each item of
evidence for proper identification. Items that could not be marked should be placed in a
suitable container and sealed.
NOTE: It is also important to note the place or location where the evidence was
collected.
X. Chain of Custody
A list of all persons who came into possession of an item of evidence, continuity of
possession, or the chain of custody, must be established whenever evidence is presented in
court as an exhibit. Adherence to standard procedures in recording the location of evidence,
marking it for identification, and properly completing evidence submission forms for
laboratory analysis is critical to chain of custody. Every person who handled or examined
the evidence and where it is at all times must be accounted for.
As a rule, all seized evidence must be in the custody of the evidence custodian and
deposited in the evidence room or designated place for safekeeping.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
(Change of Possession)
The Scene
Evidence –Seal, Markings,
Evidence Log
Evidence Collector (Officer on Case)
Letter Request
Crime Laboratory
Result
Evidence Custodian
Court Presentation
Other definition:
Chain custody is the term used to describe the identification and control of evidence
from the time it is collected at the scene until it is entered into evidence in court.
- oOo -
RESPONDERS’ MANUAL
CHAPTER I
BACKGROUND
GENERAL – The Philippine National Police is mandated to enforce the law, maintain
peace and order, protect life and property, ensure public safety with the active support of the
community.
The patrol elements composed of the foot and mobile patrols are the most ubiquitous
members of the force and are synonymous to police presence. They are the ones who almost
always arrive first at the scene of the crime in response to calls for police assistance. Being the
“First Responders,” it is imperative that patrol officers are able to identify violations of law, bring
criminals to justice, collect and preserve pieces of evidence, and assist in the prosecution of
offenders.
Purpose - This First Responders Handbook provides guidance for patrol officers and
other members of the force who respond to the scene of a disaster or other emergency as
enumerated in the succeeding pages. It assists them in establishing on-scene command,
formulating a situation estimate, alerting others to the condition of emergency, and guides them
what to do and how to do it when faced by specific situations.
Scope - The handbook discusses the policies, procedures, measures and safety
considerations governing the commitment of police patrols in the interest of public order and
safety.
The procedure should be applied where possible to offenses and situations listed. A
modification of some procedures may be necessary because of particular circumstances,
however, most will apply in a majority of cases.
CHAPTER II
HOSTAGE SITUATIONS
Personnel responding to hostage incidents are primarily responsible for minimizing
injuries, strategically deploying personnel, gathering intelligence and initiating a holding action to
contain the hostage taker pending arrival of SWAT/Crisis Response Team and unit Negotiating
Team.
1. Upon arrival at the scene:
a. Assess the situation. Confine/isolate the suspect/s to his present location by taking
positions with maximum cover but with good field of view/fire.
b. Notify higher Hqs and request special units (SWAT/Negotiating Team, EOD, etc.)
to respond.
c. Request medical ambulance team, fire truck and rescue van to standby.
d. Request assistance from nearest unit, if necessary, to cordon/secure the area and
control/direct traffic.
e. Cordon area and isolate from pedestrian/ vehicular traffic.
f. Evacuate injured persons.
g. Cause evacuation of adjacent buildings or rooms, if necessary.
2. Establish identity and objective of the suspect/s.
3. Establish identity of victim/s (age, sex, description, clothing) and determine if anyone
is killed or injured.
4. Determine probable location of the suspect/s within the structure, their number and
weaponry.
5. Determine access routes and advise concerned units. Note the following:
a. General description of the area.
b. Access routes from the target site/objective to probable Staging Area.
c. Cover, concealment and open areas.
d. Field of view.
e. Field of fire.
f. Distance from the target site to the Staging Area.
6. Continuously attempt to achieve every possible tactical advantage over the suspect.
7. Invite persons who can supply pertinent information for investigation/ getting
information.
8. Persuade the suspect to surrender and release the hostage.
9. If verbal efforts to persuade the suspect to surrender failed, secure the area and wait
for arrival of SWAT and Negotiating Team.
CHAPTER III
MURDER/HOMICIDE
Crime reported:
1. Date and time of complaint.
2. Name of complainant.
3. Other details (5 W’s & 1 H: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, WHY, HOW)
4. Record the weather condition.
5. Alert units for dragnet operations
6. Notify higher Hqs.
Upon arrival at the scene:
1. Record date and time of arrival.
2. Observe and record general condition, including weather.
3. Determine if suspects are still in the crime scene.
4. Secure the crime scene with rope/Police line.
5. Identify probable witnesses and remove them from the crime scene.
6. Note names of persons at the crime scene. They are potential witnesses.
7. Take notes and sketches.
8. Photograph crime scene.
Suspects still at the crime scene:
1. Take cover and size up the situation.
2. Determine probable location of the suspects within the structure.
3. Identify and arrest the suspect/s if possible.
4. Seal off all possible escape routes.
5. Inform higher Hqs and request for reinforcement, if necessary.
6. Alert all units of possible escape of suspects.
7. Persuade suspects to surrender.
If suspects have already fled:
1. Evacuate casualty to nearest hospitals.
2. Notify higher Hqs.
3. Conduct pursuit operations, if necessary.
4. Raise alarm for dragnet operations.
5. Protect & preserve crime scene.
6. Summon police assistance.
7. Obtain description of getaway vehicle, if any (Make, type, model, etc.)
8. Take notes & statement of witnesses (Before, during and after
commission of the crime)
5. Turn-over case to responding Investigators and assist them.
REFERENCES
Published Books:
Unpublished References:
Other References: