Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A Book Review of Debby Irving’s Waking Up White and Finding Myself in the Story of Race
Book Review
Waking Up White and Finding Myself in the Story of Race, Debby Irving, Cambridge, 2014,
The nine chapters of Debby Irving’s book Waking Up White and Finding Myself in the
Story of Race reveal how the author embarks on a quest, as a middle aged, educated, white
woman from the east coast, to understand race and racism. We can look at the book through a
series of stumbling blocks in her social awakening starting with Irving’s belief that she did not
have race, her own silent wondering, and finally her social awakening. The story begins as a
blank canvas and evolves into a less than perfect piece of art with Irving learning to recognize
that in a culture where race matters, her social awakening became the paint and she became the
painter of her canvas. Much like the work of an artist, her social awakening was messy,
frustrating, and often fraught with feelings of failure, and yet, Irving persisted. In Waking Up
White and Finding Myself in the Story of Race, Debby Irving provides her readers an inside look
at the beauty that can come from places from within the emotional mind that are scary and
uncomfortable.
Chapter Summary
Debby Irving leads with speaking of the beginning of her racial journey in Waking Up
White, going back to when she was a young child. What wasn’t said when she was growing up
led to ignorance. When Irving spoke to her mother about Indians, her mom’s response was what
she had learned from her own upbringing. The lack of knowledge to help connect Irving to the
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
historical truth was not there and no one encouraged her to dig deeper to see the other side of the
story. Irving spoke about her affluent upbringing in the upper-middle class area in the suburbs of
Boston. She was taught at an early age that hard work pays off: “Being accomplished and staying
busy were signs of good character, I believed, in part because they offered ways to show my
forebears my gratitude” (Irving, 2014 p. 10). These were the morals that were instilled in her so
that she did not know anything different. Optimism seemed to be the type of thinking that was
necessary for achievement, for those who worked hard and “kept their nose to the grindstone.”
Everyone, so it seemed, could reach the American Dream of success if they worked hard. Like
the shows which aired on television depicting the “average” American family Irving found
herself leading a normal life. Not understanding who Dr. King was during his time, Irving later
realized that, “By pretending the world was problem-free, my family culture left me grossly
unprepared to solve problems” (Irving, 2014 p. 20). Even during school, history classes were
taught through the eyes of white European Americans. This showing just one side of America’s
history, the one through rose colored lenses. As she grows, Irving, on her own, tries to figure
out what the issue really is: race or class. Both are linked: “Until I understood the impact skin
color can have on one’s life, I wasn’t able to consider racism in combination with other factors
that influence one’s culture” (Irving, 2014, p. 14). Skin color is visible, leading the author to see
It wasn’t until Irving moved to the city of Cambridge did she start seeing racial
disparities. Her bubble from which she was raised in had suddenly popped. She started working
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
on diverse committees to help understand her surroundings. As Irving’s worked progressed, this
only led to confusion –saying or doing the wrong thing. What was culturally appropriate? This
is the point in the book where she enrolled in the “Racial and Cultural Identity” course at
Wheelock College. As the college course continued more questions were arising. Digging
deeper to how the idea of race was constructed dating back to the 1600’s.
When I got honest with myself, I had to own up to the fact that I’d bought into the myth
of white superiority, silently and privately, explaining to myself the patter of white
Irving’s honesty with what she thought she knew she took and embraced her new found insight.
Realizing that the American “melting pot” was more or less come to America and act white –
making it hard when physical attributes could not be changed. She is using the terms “headwinds
and tailwinds” to characterize systematic racism, “The more I came to understand systemic
racism, the more I longed to be able to talk about it with white friends and family (Irving, 2014,
p. 60). Irving sees that there is a distorted belief system in our society that will go unchanged if
In module three, it was Ulluccci and Battey’s (Ullucci and Battey, 2011) article Exposing
color blindness/grounding color consciousness: Challenges for teacher education, the authors
speak about how whiteness is deeply interconnected to color blindness. Like in Waking Up
White, Irving was going from colorblindness to color consciousness, “A necessary step in
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
recognizing others’ worldviews and experiences as valid requires acknowledging that such
paradigms are racially informed and not monolithic” (Ullucci and Battey, 2011, p. 1200). The
article speaks about deconstructing whiteness in one’s own values and understanding those of
other cultures. Just as Irving was doing on her journey to understanding her views on race and
class.
There is a crossover in Irving’s book and Tatum’s article (Tatum,1992) from module two,
Talking about race, learning about racism: The application of racial identity development theory
in the classroom, “Because of the prejudice and racism inherent in our environments when we
were children, I assume that we cannot be blamed for learning what we were taught
(intentionally or unintentionally)” (Tatum, 1992, p.4). Both authors seem to share the same
upbringing, they learned about their environments from their parents who may have not known
any different from their rearing. Tatum explains that as adults there is an unwritten responsibility
that we need to take on to identify and understand the cycle of oppression that is continuing. Just
because one was taught to maybe think or act a certain way, does not mean that it was right.
There needs to be a time when we come to recognize that society may have been misinformed
about things and need to take responsibility to find accurate information and alter our behavior.
Chapter 3: “Why didn’t I Wake up Sooner?” Irving finds herself in the midst of a
“breakthrough” during the Wheelock course (Irving, 2014 p. 63). The Wheelock course is what
is rooted in her “awakening.” At this point in the text Irving is exploring self-reinforced thinking
that creates a perceived evidence that leads one to a narrow perception about the meaning of skin
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
color. She explores the definition of culture she held from her childhood with what she now
describes a set of beliefs and behaviors that identify the group. Though individuals in the
group vary, these common beliefs and behaviors hold the group together. (Irving, 2014,
p. 63-64)
The Iceberg theory enlightens Irving and makes her privy to her own whiteness, assumptions,
and calls into question her own logic skills that has delivered her to a place of beginning to
understand racism and the missing complexities surrounding stereotypes and racism that she
possesses (Irving, 2014, p. 65). Next, racialized ideas are threaded throughout the chapter. Irving
states:
I begin to see how racialized ideas get handed along like a relay torch. Ideas create
outcomes that, if unexamined, reinforce old ideas --m America’s oldest idea being that
the white race rules. White folks don’t just control America’s institutions; they control
the narrative. And the narrative, I believe, controls just about everything else. (Irving,
2014, p. 67)
Irving draws attention to the various forms of privilege being present in her life and how she has
overlooked her privilege when she had it the most (Irving, 2014, p. 71), capitalizing even further
on her understanding of her white dominance. Lastly, she explores what she calls the zap factor,
which creates a perfect metaphorical circuit to keep racism in its currency. This concept comes
about because people of color have been trained/conditioned to not bring up race to white people,
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
and white people are conditioned to not to see race. In this schema, the author is placed in the
direct path of creating a surge of avoidance that perpetuated the zap factor (Irving, 2014, p. 75).
In the end of chapter 3, the whole story is “stories feed our belief systems” (Irving, 2014, p. 82).
The moral of this chapter is if dominant culture continues to believe white is right, then different
narratives become ignored and the cycle of racism will be perpetuated (Irving, 2014, p. 85).
Categorization takes center stage at the end of chapter 3. At the forefront of categorization are
logos and stereotypes, which are important parts of memory retrieval that store information
neatly in our brain and result in labels. Categorization turns people into symbols and logos and/or
adding attributive tags in conversation when talking about people of color, but never asserting
the same rule for white people because white was implied. Irving adds:
How could I have avoided labeling the white population, when I seemed to do it so
naturally to every other cultural group? Easy: I had no language and therefore no file
folder in which to collect stories and stereotypes for the white race, the invisible race
The challenge is noting what “we” as readers have filed for people of color and what stereotypes
Chapter 4: “My Good People.” Irving calls into question the idea of the “good people”
theory. Learning about how racism works went against her paradigm of her family being good
and what she was explicitly taught in regards to being polite and honest and not being selfish.
The pushback around racism was not about it being new information; it was about it being
“completely contradictory” information (Irving, 2014 p. 95). As Irving evolves in her “waking
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
up,” the more aware and authentic she becomes about the ideas she was holding such as
color-blindness and how it simply does not get any more racist than saying that one does not see
color. Irving distinguishes the difference between people of color, making sense of a racialized
world and all that comes with it. For whites, it comes with invisible privileges (Irving, 2014, p.
101). Next, in the “my good luck” subheading of this chapter, Irving continues to explore
privilege, and more specifically how she benefited from family connections to secure
employment, gain housing, afford the ability to own a car, and exit college debt free. All her
“good luck” or privilege helped perpetuate the cycle of racism. Lastly, Irving addresses what she
calls her Robin Hood syndrome. The syndrome is basically the idea that she knew what was best
for “others” and when what she thought was not actuality she was left with another reality, also
My Robin Hood era had ended with the sound of a deflating balloon, not the accolades
and gratitude I’d anticipated. I felt demoralized, saddened that the ending hadn’t turned
out as I envisioned. I’m discovering now that neat and tidy endings, especially happy
ones, are yet another luxury of the entitled. (Irving, 2014, p. 111)
During this phase of her life, Irving had not yet come to terms with systemic racism. She was
unprepared for any conversation that would challenge racism and push her out of her zone of
comfort, and she was even further away from wrestling with the deeper components she
addressed in this chapter and earlier chapters like invisible privilege, the zap factor, missing
Analysis and Application of course readings Chapters 3-4. The beauty of reading the
Irving memoir is that her “awakening” parallels the module readings wonderfully. Just as Irving
is starting to understand her whiteness, Carter, Helms and Juby’s The Relationship Between
Racism and Racial Identity for White Americans: A Profile Analysis in module 1 informs readers
about such topics as racial identity schemas in which they talk about white racial identity and
attitudes, just as Irving ebbs through many of the Schemas (Carter, Helm and Juby, 2004, p.3).
DiAngelo in Module 2 further defines whiteness for her readers and Irving many times
throughout the book is the embodiment of DiAngelo’s work around White Fragility (DiAngelo,
2011, p. 56). Ullucci and Battey Exposing color blindness/grounding color consciousness:
Challenges for teacher education in Module 3 build on the colorblindness and a misperceptions.
Irving spends considerable amounts of time “grappling”(Irving, 2014, p. 109) with this concept
and many others. In the article What is Critical Race Theory and what’s it doing in a nice field
like education?, author Ladson-Billings helps develop a working definition of critical race theory
and more importantly the stories of people of color and how race does matter (Ladson-Billings,
1998, p.8), while at the same time Irving is uncovering her privilege in understanding stories and
how many times she shut down narratives dismissing them as not aligning with her values or
how they just made her uncomfortable all of these were privileges afforded her because of the
color of her skin. Each of the modules provide a nugget of overlap as a teeter-totter between
research and theory, the narrative consequence, learning or outcome from the modules readings.
The Irving book is a refreshing balance that is welcome between the heaviness that emerges in
10
Irving, after spending hours with her friends and colleagues from various backgrounds,
she found it difficult to retreat to her white cocoon. All the while, she felt conflicted about what
side she belonged to, even though she felt a deep connection with living in her Cambridge world,
where she “felt freed from the kind of homogeneous, dominant culture I’d known in Winchester”
From various diversity trainings over the years, Irving learned that talking about race and
skin color does not have to be a taboo topic with children. Using those moments allows talking
and teaching about race to be natural. In another training, she was stunned by how certain words
can cause rage in different groups of people. Irving sent an email expressing her emotions from
her experience:
I confessed to a mounting stew of confusing and upsetting feelings around race. I listed
about twenty emotions I was wrestling with, including guilt, despair, fear, hopelessness,
confusion, and anxiety. I told him that I didn’t feel I was getting closer to understanding
cross-race relations and i didn’t know how to proceed. (Irving, 2014, p. 128).
Irving comes to terms that she spent many years trying to help and fix others to help them fit in,
that she hadn’t considered her role in perpetuating the dominant culture that shut them out.
How can racism possibly be dismantled until white people, lots and lots of white people,
understand it as an unfair system, get in touch with the subtle stories and stereotypes that
play in their heads, and see themselves not as good or bad but as players in the system?
11
Irving discusses that white people need to embrace the elephant in the room of self awareness in
order to dismantle racism. As Irving begins her awakening process, she begins “leaving behind
[her] culture of bravado, comfort, and polite conversation to open up and grow” (Irving, p. 154).
In this chapter, Irving discusses leaving the comfort of her white world. The phrase
“intent versus impact” is introduced, where a person’s intentions “have been misunderstood or
they’ve misunderstood another’s” (Irving, 2014 p. 159). When race is mixed in, cultural
difference combined with pent-up emotions can cause charged intent-versus impact upsets. On
the advice of a racial justice colleague, Irving attends a conference by and for professionals of
color. Upon sharing her thoughts with the crowd, many expressed that she should examine her
whiteness. Afterwards, five men and women of color had stayed with her to teach her the impact
The “culture of niceness” Irving grew up with was how everyone around her gets along
and seems happy to work together, but there are simmering issues that cannot be addressed, and
internalizes that nice equates to good. “The culture of niceness did nothing short of program me
away from my humanity and into a socially scripted role with diminished capacity to feel my
way through situations” (Irving, 2014, p. 169). A cycle is created as this culture of niceness
provides a social norm stating that conflict is bad and discomfort should be avoided. To move
forward from this, creating a space for open conversation is necessary. Dominant culture and
stereotypes can be addressed when white people “learn how to listen to the experiences of people
of color for racial healing and justice to happen” (Irving, 2014, p. 175).
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
12
As Irving left her comfort zone, she delved into perception reversal as she became
hyper-aware of people’s physical attributes. Fear of “otherness” and fear of an “other” with
power comes with the sense of symbolism of whiteness. The “Beloved Community” was a
concept of Dr. Martin Luther King, which envisioned complete racial, class, and national
integration and brotherhood. One of the most important tasks of dismantling racism--within
In module 2, DiAngelo states in White Fragility, “White Fragility is a state in which even
a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves”
(DiAngelo, 2011). Emotions include: anger, fear, guilt. Behaviors include: argumentation,
silence, and leaving the stress-inducing situation. Like in Waking Up White, Irving stated her
emotions as she became aware of her whiteness and as she started to learn about cross-race
Irving strives to reconstruct her white racial identity as she is in the Disintegration stage,
as described by Tatum. According to Tatum in Talking About Race, Learning About Racism,
“certain kinds of experiences (increased interaction with people of color or exposure to new
information about racism) may lead to a new understanding that cultural and institutional racism
exist” (Tatum,1992). Irving’s lack of awareness changes as she becomes aware of racial issues
In Matias’ Check Yo'self before You Wreck Yo'self and Our Kids, they discuss how
people need to “re-experience the pain of racism” (Matias, 2013, p. 78). Like Irving’s
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
13
experiences, white people can draw from scholars of color that depict the emotional trauma of
racism and white antiracist scholarship on the emotional shift of becoming a better white ally.
We learn that despite the discomfort of unveiling whiteness, it is worth the commitment to racial
justice.
Chapter 7: “Inner Work.” In Chapter 7 of Waking Up White, Irving asserts that before
one can begin to tackle the larger and more complex examples of systemic racism and
discrimination in America, it is the “inner work” that needs to happen first. Commonly, white
people feel that they do not have a race or culture, believing that white mainstream culture is the
norm and that all others differ from this typified culture. Critical self-reflection is needed to
parse out the ways in which we have contributed and identified with a culture that is, however,
visible or invisible, inequitable, and has shaped our current selves. Irving brings notice to the
dominant culture’s proclivity for dichotomies, namely the either/or and better/worse which
frames everyone’s experiences, practices, and worth as superior or inferior, dichotomies that
became foundational in her thinking. In assessing every practice or attribute as better or worse,
she came to belief that is was her and her family’s superior habits and traits that led her to be so
successful. Undoing and understanding these ways of thinking within one’s self are essential
before one can move to the work of disrupting racial discrimination away from the home.
Chapter 8: “Outer Work.” Outer Work chronicles key moments in Irving’s journey as a
social justice advocate. She likens the work for racial equality to that of bullying in its three
actors: the bully, the victim, and the bystanders. Very much as there are those on the offensive
and defensive in a bullying scenario, the most harm is often caused by those standing on the
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
14
sidelines. This often happens because the role of the bystander is one of ease and comfort.
Disrupting racism and changing paradigms require difficult conversations, enduring awkward
moments, and acknowledging our own blunders so that we as people can come to an honest and
collective understanding about race in America. Irving faces her own blunder as she calls to
apologize to the parent of another girl on her daughter’s soccer team after she mistakenly called
her the name of another girl of color. She reflects on the harm caused historically when people
of color are misidentified, picks up the phone, and faces her mistake, leading to a vulnerable and
Humanity by asserting that racism is two-pronged; it was not simply her socialization in white
dominant culture but also the incomplete or false narratives she was fed about race that
perpetuated her ignorance and directed her to a life of comfort rather than vulnerability and
compassion. She recalls the last days of her father’s life in which he confesses to her that he did
not do enough to help others and (she believes) stand up in the face of injustice. This further
supports what she sees as her responsibility to our collective humanity, to use the privilege that
she cannot deny or give away to bring America closer to equity. The end of the chapter is a call
to action for her readers to educate themselves, engage with people of color and white people
alike, donate to organizations like Race Forward and the White Privilege Conference Fund, spur
racial awareness, and take a course, as she did, that can elicit your own racial awakening and
15
Analysis and Application of course readings Chapters 7-9. J ust as Irving came to the painful
reality that meritocracy is a myth, and that she was set up for success by varying intersectional
factors in her life, primarily race, Beverly Daniel Tatum’s experience teaching a class on the
notion of the United States as a just society where rewards are based solely on one’s
merit. Such a challenge often creates discomfort in students...students are not necessarily
Throughout Waking Up White, Irving moves through multiple stages of White identity
development. In Chapters 7-9, her thinking and behavior is best typified by the
Just as the Black students seeks to redefine positively what it means to be of African
ancestry in the United States through immersion in accurate information about one’s
culture and history, the White individual seeks to replace racially related myths and
stereotypes with accurate information about what it means and has meant to be White in
In Irving’s exploration of the ways in which she has experienced systematic advantage
due to her whiteness, T.J. Yosso’s and Annette Lareau’s definitions and applications of cultural
capital are poignant. Lareau points out that individuals inherit skills that take on different value
knowledge, and varied experiences with institutions like healthcare and the criminal justice
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
16
system (Laureau, 2015). “The dominant groups within society are able to maintain power
because access is limited to acquiring and learning strategies to use these forms of capital for
social mobility” (Yosso, 2016). In Chapters 7-9, Irving is cognizant of the ways in which
cultural capital positively or negatively impacts experiences and outcomes based on context. It
becomes her mission to disrupt the prejudice and inequity of this reality.
Much as Irving understands the power of ignorance and the impacts of a culture of
Because of the prejudice and racism inherent in our environments when we were
children, I assume that we cannot be blamed for learning what we were taught
and interrupt the cycle of oppression. When we recognize that we have been
Both authors convey that amending the past is impossible and ignoring it is a futile and harmful
effort. Rather, the work to be done is focusing on that change that is possible in the future. This
requires denouncing the deficit lens that Communities of Color are so often viewed through, as
described in Whose culture has capital (Yosso, 2016), and examining the hidden prejudices that
lie below our consciousness, and valuing the unique capital that all races and ethnicities bring to
the table.
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
17
Discussion Conclusion
From reading Irving’s book, I have come to realize that learning about yourself is a
continuous lifelong process. Realizing what I thought was the norm because it was the way it
was presented growing up can have an effect on one’s upbringing. Being able to journey
through Irving’s wake-up, I have been able to question some of the decisions my family has
made as well as looking into myself. Being unconscious about some of the decisions or thoughts
I may have made has allowed me to deepen my new found understanding of what my whiteness
is.
The take away learning from Irving is her delivery of seriousness and appropriate
amounts of humor. She models vulnerability and one cannot truly come to a moment of
awakening without it. You can be both a good person and racist it is what you do with that
information that can be life altering. I want to continue to engage the way Irving has over the
years since her Wheelock course to having her own class where she gets to lead others into their
“awakening”. As an educator I can see how necessary it is to sometimes just go with the
conversation even when it is uncomfortable and to create a “new normal” for engaging in
Going through this journey with Irving, a big takeaway is the necessity to be vulnerable
in your learning. Reconstructing our racial identity will not be linear. It will be uncomfortable
during your awakening, but being able to discuss openly will allow you to grow, especially when
so much has been unintentionally ingrained into our upbringing without us knowing it. Despite
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
18
being uncomfortable with unveiling our whiteness and our privileges, it’s worth the commitment
The impact that Debby Irving has had on my thoughts and views of society has led me to
see how different now my future practices will be. My insight on how I view culture has shifted
and I am now more aware of the implications I may be instilling in my students when teaching or
the people I talk to. As Irving went through later in her life, I am now able to start practicing my
cultural awareness sooner. Practicing my openness to others thinking - not being afraid to bring
I am not considering the impact on future practices because I am in the moment of right
now. Debby Irving has impacted my current practice weekly over the last 7 weeks. Each week
something that I read became a topic of conversation with students or with colleagues. Her work
invited me to try new things in my classroom. Her openness invited me to be more open with
students and to allow a space for students to constructively talk about their current understanding
of race, culture, identity, and what it means to be a student of color. To equip them with use of
equitable language and model vulnerability around areas where I can do better at connecting
their culture to the classroom and curriculum to make it relevant to who they are as learners.
Irving has led me to think more about how my background and upbringing have
privileged me in ways that I have never considered. Irving talking about intent versus impact has
made me think about my discussions with people in the future. Even now, I am actively thinking
about how what I’m saying is affecting the people who I am conversing with. I intend on having
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
19
more open, courageous conversations with my students and others to disrupt the cycle and
dismantle racism.
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
20
References
DiAngelo, R. (2011). White fragility. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy 3( 3).
Irving, D. (2014). Waking up white: And finding myself in the story of race. Cambridge, MA:
Review,80(1), 1-27.
Matias, C. E. (2013). Check Yo'self before You Wreck Yo'self and Our Kids: Counterstories
68-81.
Tatum, B. (1992). Talking about race, learning about racism: The application of racial identity
development theory in the classroom. Harvard Educational Review 62 (1), 1-25.
Ullucci, K., & Battey, D. (2011). Exposing color blindness/grounding color consciousness:
Yosso, T. J. (2016). Whose Culture Has Capital? Critical Race Theory in Education,113-136.
Running head: GROUP 4 BOOK REVIEW C&T 807
21
Zeus Leonardo (2016) Tropics of whiteness: metaphor and the literary turn in white studies,