0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
20 vizualizări1 pagină
This presentation grading rubric evaluates oral presentations based on 5 criteria: organization, topic knowledge, audience adaptation, language use, and delivery. For each criterion, descriptors are provided for emerging (1-2 points), developing (3-4 points), and advanced (5 points) levels of performance. At the emerging level, the presentation lacks focus, purpose, and structure. At the developing level, the main ideas are evident but could be strengthened. At the advanced level, the presentation is clearly organized and developed to achieve its purpose and engage the audience.
This presentation grading rubric evaluates oral presentations based on 5 criteria: organization, topic knowledge, audience adaptation, language use, and delivery. For each criterion, descriptors are provided for emerging (1-2 points), developing (3-4 points), and advanced (5 points) levels of performance. At the emerging level, the presentation lacks focus, purpose, and structure. At the developing level, the main ideas are evident but could be strengthened. At the advanced level, the presentation is clearly organized and developed to achieve its purpose and engage the audience.
This presentation grading rubric evaluates oral presentations based on 5 criteria: organization, topic knowledge, audience adaptation, language use, and delivery. For each criterion, descriptors are provided for emerging (1-2 points), developing (3-4 points), and advanced (5 points) levels of performance. At the emerging level, the presentation lacks focus, purpose, and structure. At the developing level, the main ideas are evident but could be strengthened. At the advanced level, the presentation is clearly organized and developed to achieve its purpose and engage the audience.
(1-2 points) (3 – 4 points) (5 points) 1. Organization Ideas may not be focused or developed; the main Main idea is evident, but the organizational Ideas are clearly organized, developed, and supported to achieve a purpose is not clear. The introduction is undeveloped. structure many need to be strengthened; ideas may purpose; the purpose is clear. The introduction gets the attention of the Main points are difficult to identify. Transitions may not clearly developed or always flow smoothly and audience and clearly states the specific purpose of the speech. Main points be needed. There is no conclusion or may not be clear the purpose is not clearly stated. The introduction are clear and organized effectively. The conclusion is satisfying and the presentation has concluded. Conclusion does not may not be well developed. Main points are not relates back to introduction. tie back to the introduction. Audience cannot clear. Transitions may be awkward. Supporting understand presentation because there is no sequence material may lack in development. The conclusion of information. may need additional development. Audience has difficulty understanding the presentation because the sequence of information is unclear. 2. Topic Knowledge Presenter does not have grasp of information; cannot Presenter has a partial grasp of the information. Presenter has a clear grasp of information. Citations are introduced and answer questions about the subject. Few, if any, Citations are generally introduced and attributed attributed appropriately and accurately. Demonstrates full knowledge sources are cited. Citations are attributed incorrectly. appropriately. Student is at ease with expected (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations Inaccurate, generalized, or inappropriate supporting answers to all questions but fails to elaborate. Over and elaboration. Speaking outline or note cards are used for reference material may be used. Over dependence on notes may dependence on notes may be observed. only. be observed. 3. Audience Adaptation The presenter is not able to keep the audience The presenter is able to keep the audience engaged The presenter is able to effectively keep the audience engaged. Material is engaged. The verbal or nonverbal feedback from the most of the time. When feedback indicates a need modified or clarified as needed given audience verbal and nonverbal audience may suggest a lack of interest or confusion. for idea clarification, the presenter makes an feedback. Nonverbal behaviors are used to keep the audience engaged. attempt to clarify or restate ideas. Generally, the Delivery style is modified as needed. speaker demonstrates audience awareness through nonverbal and verbal behaviors. 4. Language Use Language choices may be limited, peppered with Language used is mostly respectful or inoffensive. Language is familiar to the audience, appropriate for the setting, and free (Verbal Effectiveness) slang or jargon, too complex, or too dull. Language is Language is appropriate, but word choices are not of bias; the presenter may “code-switch” (use a different language form) questionable or inappropriate for a particular particularly vivid or precise. when appropriate. Language choices are vivid and precise. audience, occasion, or setting. Some biased or unclear language may be used. 5. Delivery The delivery detracts from the message; eye contact The delivery generally seems effective – however, The delivery is extemporaneous -- natural, confident, and enhances the (Nonverbal Effectiveness) may be very limited; the presenter may tend to look at effective use of volume, eye contact, vocal control, message – posture, eye contact, smooth gestures, facial expressions, the floor, mumble, speak inaudibly, fidget, or read etc. may not be consistent; some hesitancy may be volume, pace, etc. indicate confidence, a commitment to the topic, and a most of the speech; gestures and movements may be observed. Vocal tone, facial expressions, clothing willingness to communicate. The vocal tone and delivery style, are jerky or excessive. The delivery may appear and other nonverbal expressions do not detract consistent with the message. Limited use of nonfluencies is observed. inconsistent with the message. Nonfluencies (“ums”) significantly from the message. The delivery style, Articulation and pronunciation are clear. All audience members can hear are used excessively. Articulation and pronunciation and tone of voice, do not seem out-of-place or the presentation. tend to be sloppy. Poise of composure is lost during disrespectful to the audience . Some use of any distractions. Audience members have difficulty nonfluencies are observed. Generally, articulation hearing the presentation. and pronunciation are clear. Most audience members can hear the presentation.
2005. Adapted with permission from Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (1998).