Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The payment period (PP) is the length of time between cash flows (inflows or outflows). It is
common that the lengths of the payment period and the compounding period (CP) do not coin-
cide. It is important to determine if PP CP, PP CP, or PP CP.
If a company deposits money each month into an account that earns at the nominal rate of 8%
per year, compounded semiannually, the cash flow deposits define a payment period of 1 month
and the nominal interest rate defines a compounding period of 6 months. These time periods are
shown in Figure 4–4. Similarly, if a person deposits a bonus check once a year into an account
that compounds interest quarterly, PP 1 year and CP 3 months.
CP CP
6 months 6 months
Method 1: Determine the effective interest rate over the compounding period CP, and set n
equal to the number of compounding periods between P and F. The relations to calculate P and
F are
P F(PF, effective i% per CP, total number of periods n) [4.8]
F P(FP, effective i% per CP, total number of periods n) [4.9]
For example, assume that the stated credit card rate is nominal 15% per year, compounded
monthly. Here CP is 1 month. To find P or F over a 2-year span, calculate the effective monthly
rate of 15%12 1.25% and the total months of 2(12) 24. Then 1.25% and 24 are used in the
PF and FP factors.
Any time period can be used to determine the effective interest rate; however, the interest rate
that is associated with the CP is typically the best because it is usually a whole number. There-
fore, the factor tables in the back of the text can be used.
Method 2: Determine the effective interest rate for the time period t of the nominal rate, and
set n equal to the total number of periods, using this same time period.
The P and F relations are the same as in Equations [4.8] and [4.9] with the term effective i% per t
substituted for the interest rate. For a credit card rate of 15% per year, compounded monthly, the
time period t is 1 year. The effective rate over 1 year and the n values are
( )
0.15 12
Effective i% per year 1 —— 1 16.076%
12
n 2 years
The PF factor is the same by both methods: (PF,1.25%,24) 0.7422 using Table 5 in the rear
of the text; and (PF,16.076%,2) 0.7422 using the PF factor formula.
When cash flows involve a series (i.e., A, G, g) and the payment period equals or exceeds the
compounding period in length:
• Find the effective i per payment period.
• Determine n as the total number of payment periods.
In performing equivalence computations for series, only these values of i and n can be used in
interest tables, factor formulas, and spreadsheet functions. In other words, there are no other
combinations that give the correct answers, as there are for single-amount cash flows.
Table 4–6 shows the correct formulation for several cash flow series and interest rates. Note
that n is always equal to the total number of payment periods and i is an effective rate expressed
over the same time period as n.
0 6 months
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Years
P = $3 million
Figure 4–7
Cash flow diagram with two different compounding periods, Example 4.10.
For a no-interperiod-interest policy, negative cash flows (deposits or payments, depending on the
perspective used for cash flows) are all regarded as made at the end of the compounding period,
and positive cash flows (receipts or withdrawals) are all regarded as made at the beginning.
As an illustration, when interest is compounded quarterly, all monthly deposits are moved to the end
of the quarter (no interperiod interest is earned), and all withdrawals are moved to the beginning (no
interest is paid for the entire quarter). This procedure can significantly alter the distribution of cash
flows before the effective quarterly rate is applied to find P, F, or A. This effectively forces the cash
flows into a PP CP situation, as discussed in Sections 4.5 and 4.6. Example 4.11 illustrates this
procedure and the economic fact that, within a one-compounding-period time frame, there is no
interest advantage to making payments early. Of course, noneconomic factors may be present.
If PP CP and interperiod compounding is earned, then the cash flows are not moved, and the
equivalent P, F, or A values are determined using the effective interest rate per payment period.
The engineering economy relations are determined in the same way as in the previous two sections
for PP CP. The effective interest rate formula will have an m value less than 1, because there is
only a fractional part of the CP within one PP. For example, weekly cash flows and quarterly com-
pounding require that m 113 of a quarter. When the nominal rate is 12% per year, compounded
quarterly (the same as 3% per quarter, compounded quarterly), the effective rate per PP is
Effective weekly i% (1.03)113 1 0.228% per week
Continuous compounding is present when the duration of CP, the compounding period, becomes
infinitely small and m, the number of times interest is compounded per period, becomes infinite.
Businesses with large numbers of cash flows each day consider the interest to be continuously
compounded for all transactions.
As m approaches infinity, the effective interest rate Equation [4.7] must be written in a new
form. First, recall the definition of the natural logarithm base.
h ( h )
1 h e 2.71828
lim 1 — [4.10]
The limit of Equation [4.7] as m approaches infinity is found by using rm 1h, which makes
m hr.
r m
lim i lim ( 1 —
m m m) 1
( ) [( ) ] 1
1 hr 1 h r
lim 1 — 1 lim 1 —
h h h h
i ⴝ er ⴚ 1 [4.11]
Equation [4.11] is used to compute the effective continuous interest rate, when the time periods
on i and r are the same. As an illustration, if the nominal annual r 15% per year, the effective
continuous rate per year is
i% e0.15 1 16.183%
For convenience, Table 4–3 includes effective continuous rates for the nominal rates listed.
To find an effective or nominal interest rate for continuous compounding using the spread-
sheet functions EFFECT or NOMINAL, enter a very large value for the compounding fre-
quency m in Equation [4.5] or [4.6], respectively. A value of 10,000 or higher provides sufficient
accuracy. Both functions are illustrated in Example 4.12.
P ⴝ F1(PF,i1,1) ⴙ F2(PF,i1,1)(PF,i2,1) ⴙ . . .
ⴙ Fn(PF,i1,1)(PF,i2,1) . . . (PF,in,1) [4.12]
When only single amounts are involved, that is, one P and one F in the final year n, the last term
in Equation [4.12] is the expression for the present worth of the future cash flow.
If the equivalent uniform series A over all n years is needed, first find P, using either of the last
two equations; then substitute the symbol A for each Ft symbol. Since the equivalent P has been
determined numerically using the varying rates, this new equation will have only one unknown,
namely, A. Example 4.14 illustrates this procedure.
When there is a cash flow in year 0 and interest rates vary annually, this cash fl ow must be
included to determineP. In the computation for the equivalent uniform series A over all years,
including year 0, it is important to include this initial cash fl ow at t 0. This is accomplished by
inserting the factor value for (PF,i0,0) into the relation for A. This factor value is always 1.00. It
is equally correct to fi nd the A value using a future worth relation for F in year n. In this case, the
A value is determined using the FP factor, and the cash fl ow in year n is accounted for by includ-
ing the factor (FP,in,0) 1.00.