Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
SUBJECT ASSIGNMENT:
OBSERVATION & RESEARCH IN THE LANGUAGE CLASSROOM
GENERAL INFORMATION:
- Length: between 4 and 6 pages (without including cover, index or appendices –if
there are any-).
- Type of font: Arial or Times New Roman.
- Size: 11.
- Line height: 1.5.
- Alignment: Justified.
The assignment has to be done in this Word document and has to fulfil the rules of
presentation and edition, as for quotes and bibliographical references which are
detailed in the Study Guide.
Also, it has to be submitted following the procedure specified in the Study Guide.
Sending it to the teacher’s e-mail is not permitted.
In addition to this, it is very important to read the assessment criteria, which can be
found in the Study Guide.
The assignment mark is 80% of the final mark and the participation in the activities
performed during the tutorials constitutes the remaining 20%.
1
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
Assignment:
Read the six case studies in the pdf document, each of which investigates a different
topic: literature, grammar, oral English, teaching techniques, language learning, writing.
When you have finished reading, follow the instructions below (from Wallace 1998:
166-169). Of the six case studies outlined above, which topic would be of most
interest/relevance for a group of students with which you are familiar? Think about how
you would need to adapt the case study for your target group's needs by considering
the following questions:
2. How would you adapt the structure of the case study to fit in with your target group
and teaching context?
3. What sort of data would you generate and how would you generate it?
Important: you have to write your personal details and the subject name on the
cover (see the next page). The assignment that does not fulfil these conditions
will not be corrected. You have to include the assignment index below the cover.
2
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
3
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
Index
Page
1. Introduction 5
2. Population 5
3. Case study 6
6. Conclusion 9
7. Appendices
Appendix 1.1 11
Appendix 1.2 12
Appendix 1.3 14
8. Bibliography 15
9. Webography 15
4
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
1. Introduction
When teaching English as a foreign language, or any language for that matter, it is
important for the teacher to take the time to observe, research and reflect on their
teaching and learning methods. By doing this, he/she can improve his/her skills and
make teaching and learning more fun for both themselves and their students.
As outlined by Wajnryb (1992: FUNIBER p.29), the reflective model of research is that
the teacherr is actively reflecting and exploring, the concept of learning is the
construction of personal meaning and that teachers themselves are the primary
initiators of their own development. Each working day is a new opportunity for a
teacher to improve his/her teaching abilities through observing and conducting the
correct research.
When considering this particular case study six and its problem of motivating
advanced level students to do writing activities, I think it is important to highlight that
writing differs in some significant ways to do with the purpose of writing in the class and
in everyday life, and the relationship between these two settings. (McDonough and
Shaw 1993: 174)
2. Population
The population which I will use for my particular case study are ten upper-intermediate
students. They are preparing to sit a B2 exam, according to the Common European
Framework of References for Language. The particular exam which they wish to do is
the First Certificate Examination held by Cambridge University. All students are either
studying full-time at the University of Jaén or have finished university and are currently
unemployed. Thus, the university students require more than a B1 certificate to hold
their university degree, while the unemployed students require a minimum of a B1 title
for better job prospects and opportunities. The students all obtained the B1 Preliminary
English Test (Cambridge) in July 2014 and wish to continue improving their English to
further their chances of good employment in the future. Out of the ten students, five are
studying or already are play-school teachers, four are primary school teachers and one
is a secondary school teacher. The students who are currently unemployed are also
preparing for their ‘Oposiciones’, the Spanish-state exams for teachers which will be
held in June.
5
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
3. Case study
I believe that I could favourably adapt the structure of case study six to compete with
the circumstances of my particular group of learners. The group from the case study
and my group of students have some similarities in which both groups have a good
level of proficiency with the English language, the groups are or have been in university
and have been exposed to tertiary education, and finally they both lack some sort of
motivation with writing tasks due to some individual reason comparing an English
writing task with a longer, more difficult university prose.
When referring back to the case study, it is highlighted that this particular
teacher used a brainstorming activity to identify English-speaking institutions outside
the university. This is not applicable to my case study as in Jaén there are very few, if
even any, English-speaking companies, and although I agree that writing an article is a
good task, I want to make the writing task more personal to each student and their job.
For this reason, I would adapt the writing task to a creative writing prose, such as a
fairy-tale for children, as the majority of the students are in contact with children below
the age of fourteen. The basic function of knowing how to write in English is still
apparent in this task, and it may be used in their daily lives, whether it be in school
teaching students, or at home with younger members of their family.
6
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
7
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
specific feedback. Finally, the following week, the ‘Story-Time’ class happens with the
younger students. The students are aged between eleven and thirteen.
From observing this entire process, it is obvious that the upper-intermediate
students gladly accepted the task when they were told what the final product was. They
recognized that the process was an important factor, because without this process of
writing the story correctly, checking grammar and vocabulary and having enough
imagination to hold the children’s attention and interest, the final product of the fairy
tale would not have been a success.
Before this activity of writing was carried out, I carried out a short questionnaire
(Appendix 1.2) with the students asking them various questions about the reasons for
learning English, future prospects, difficulties with the languages and their preferences
with skills. This made them think about the root for their knowledge of English and why
it has such importance in their lives. It was clearly highlighted before administering the
survey that the students would remain completely anonymous, thus they did not feel
threatened by any answer he / she may have given and therefore, they would have
been more honest in their answers.
I believed a questionnaire was most suitable because as Houtkoop-Steenstra
(2000) points outs: “Closed ended designs enable researchers to produce aggregated
data quickly, but the range of possible answers is set by the researchers not
respondents, and the richness of potential responses is lower. Closed ended items
often cause frustration, usually because researchers have not considered all potential
responses.” Although there are some pitfalls about questionnaires, I do think that it was
the most appropriate research method given my time and resource restrictions.
The questionnaires were clearly laid out, which made it easier for the
participants, with multiple choice answers and closed questions which helped the
student in the process and myself later in the data analysis phase. I thought about
doing the questionnaire in class, but finally I decided to ask the students to complete it
at home where they could do it in a more private situation, free of others scrutinizing
their choices.
After the project was carried out and completed, including the writing stage and
the story-telling phase, I conducted a short interview with each student (Appendix 1.3).
8
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
The questions included in the interview phase were quite open, which gave the student
more opportunity to add valid information with their opinions and thoughts about the
project, including its process and product. As the questions were about their beliefs and
ideas on the project, there was no correct nor incorrect answer, thus I presumed that
they would have a lot of feedback for me. It could have been time-consuming to note
down their possible answers, therefore using a voice recording system on my mobile
phone was more sufficient, of course, first asking for the permission from the students.
From conducting the initial questionnaires, we could see if any initial trends appeared.
This was easy to do for many reasons including the fact that there were a limited
number of students in the research target group (only ten) and also due to the
questionnaires having closed or multiple choice questions. Thus, the questionnaire
itself was quite restrictive with options, but offered the teacher easier and more concise
data analysis. Therefore, due to the restrictiveness of each question’s options, I had to
plan the questionnaires quite well and with enough detail to cater to the students
backgrounds. Also, I had to premeditate what their possible opinions may have been.
With regards to the interview phase, data analysis for this was slightly more
difficult as many different opinions were offered. As there were a set standard of
questions, some trends appeared, namely by indicating yes or no, but when they
offered more information, notes had to be taken down.
6. Conclusion
9
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
7. Appendix
10
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
11
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
7. When considering the skill of writing, on a scale of 1 (I love it) to 5 (I hate it),
how would you rate it?
a. 1 d. 4
b. 2 e. 5
c. 3
12
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
If you stated NO to the previous question, can you explain why that is?
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
10. Please circle some of the following adjectives you would use when thinking
about a writing activity.
a. exciting f. time-consuming
b. worthwhile g. pointless
c. important h. technical
d. practical i. demanding
e. boring j. long
If you stated YES to the previous question, can you explain why this is?
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
I would like to take the time to thank you for completing this questionnaire.
13
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
1. When the teacher asked you the questions about fairy tales, were you
interested in the topic?
2. When confronted with the project of writing a fairy tale, how did you feel?
3. Did you feel like you didn’t have enough imagination to make such a story?
4. When told about the ‘Story-Time’ with younger students, did you feel more
motivated to write?
5. When introduced to the idea of using the Story Cubes, did this put your mind at
ease?
6. How did you find working and sharing your ideas with a partner first?
7. How did you find the initial drafting of your own fairy tale?
8. What are your thoughts on the peer-correction part of class?
9. When finalizing your writing, did you feel a sense of pride that you had
completed it?
10. How was your experience with working with the children during ‘Story-Time’?
11. Would you consider doing an activity like this again?
12. Do you believe that by making an activity more personal, and using it as you
need to use it in the future, it makes you more motivated to complete it?
8. Bibliography
14
Universidad de Jaén
ASSIGNMENT – ORLC
- McDonough, J. & Shaw, S. (1993). Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher's Guide,
Blackwell.
9.Webography
15