Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
I. Introduction
A. Overview of Educational Issue
Technology has proven to be a valid means to providing instruction based
on the level of each individual student (Brasiel et al., 2016). There are various
online instructional programs such as MobyMax that provide individualized
instruction. However, there are also Web 2.0 tools such as Padlet that provides
opportunities for students to show their knowledge through various means like
video, voice recording, drawing, typing, etc.
B. Problem Statement
Through this research, we wish to gain a better understanding of the
effects technology has on student achievement. More specifically, we wish to
understand if technology encourages the learning environment and promotes
higher achievement or if it leads to a greater distraction within the classroom, in
which student achievement does not change or declines.
C. Review Questions
1. What effects does technology have on student achievement when Bring
Your Own Device (BYOD) policies are active in the K-12 setting?
2. What effects does the use of technology have on all core content skills and
comprehension in the classroom?
IV. References
Brasiel, S., Jeong, S., Ames, C., Lawanto, K., Yuan, M., & Martin, T. (2016). Effects of
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1148414.pdf
Burns-Sardone, N. (2013). Making the case for BYOD instruction in teacher education.
http://go.galegroup.com.proxy-
ln.researchport.umd.edu/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T002&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&s
earchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm¤tPosition=1&d
ocId=GALE%7CA420050950&docType=Report&sort=RELEVANCE&contentSegment
=&prodId=AONE&contentSet=GALE%7CA420050950&searchId=R1&userGroupNam
e=loyoland_main&inPS=true
Chou, P., Chang, C., Lin, C. (2017). BYOD or not: A comparison of two assessment strategies
for student learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 63-71. Retrieved from
https://www-sciencedirect-com.proxy-
ln.researchport.umd.edu/science/article/pii/S0747563217302662?via%3Dihub
and pedagogical shifts and changes to the instructional environment (Order No.
http://proxy-ln.researchport.umd.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy-
ln.researchport.umd.edu/docview/1820870518?accountid=12164
Hoye, S. R. (2017). Teachers' perceptions of the use of technology in the classroom and the
effect
https://proxy-ln.researchport.umd.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED583196&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Mancillas, L. K., & Brusoe, P. W. (2016). Born Digital: Integrating Media Technology in the
Middleton, B. M., & Murray, R. K. (1999). The impact of instructional technology on student
https://search-proquest-com.proxy-ln.researchport.umd.edu/docview/204260743/fulltextP
DF/40EE17D9FF9541F7PQ/1?accountid=12164
Mo, D., Huang, W., Shi, Y., Zhang, L., Boswell, M., & Rozelle, S. (2015). Computer technology
among rural students in China. China Economic Review, 36, 131-145. Retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X15001133
Paek, S., & Fulton, L. A. (2016). Elementary students using a tablet-based note-taking
https://proxy-ln.researchport.umd.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1113208&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Rehmat, A.P., & Bailey, J.M. (2014). Technology integration in a science classroom: Preservice
University).Retrieved from:
https://search-proquest-com.proxy-ln.researchport.umd.edu/docview/1826019544?accoun
tid=12164
Souleles, N. (2017). iPad versus traditional tools in art and design: A complementary association.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjet.12446
ERIC Library