Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
University
Leadership has been described as the "process of social influence in which one
person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common
task."
Leadership is "organizing a group of people to achieve a common goal." The leader
may or may not have any formal authority. Students of leadership have produced
theories involving traits, situational interaction, function, behavior, power, vision
and values ‘charisma’, and intelligence among others.
“Leadership is an interactive conversation that pulls people towards becoming
comfortable with language of personal responsibility and commitment”
MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS: -
Managerial Effectiveness is often defined in terms of output - what a manager
achieves. This result oriented definition leads us to look for the factors that
contribute towards the “results”. Studies find three factors to be responsible for the
results that an organization achieves through its managers. These are:
(a) the efforts and ability of the managers,
(b) the environment in which the managers and the organization operates, (c) the
efforts and ability of the subordinates. Thus, the managers’ ability is the key element
in achieving the desired results.
RESEARCH TYPE:
Descriptive Research
DATA USED:
Secondary Data: mainly from articles from different journals and different websites.
In the early 1980's we set upon a quest to discover what it took to become a leader.
We wanted to know the common practices of ordinary men and women when they
were at their leadership best--when they were able to take people to places they had
never been before. Strategies, tactics, skills, and practices are empty (or worse yet,
manipulative and exploitative) unless we understand the fundamental human
aspirations that connect leaders and constituents. Leadership is certainly not
conveyed in a gene, and it's most definitely not a secret code that can't be understood
by ordinary folks.
Our analysis of thousands of cases and surveys from over a dozen years of research
has revealed a consistent pattern of exemplary leader- ship practices and
fundamental constituent expectations. But knowing that the portrait emerging from
the study of personal-best leadership experiences was only a partial picture, we also
explored the expectations that the constituents have of people they would be willing
to follow. What we've learned from studies specifically with college student leaders
over the past five years has only strengthened our fundamental appreciation that
Leadership is not a mysterious, mystical, or ethereal concept--one that is somehow
beyond the scope and imagination of the vast majority of people. Our research has
shown us that leadership is an observable, learnable set of practices. Indeed, the
belief that leadership can't be learned is a far more powerful deterrent to
development than is the nature of the leadership.
Sources-http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?
did=1609415251&sid=1&Fmt=4&clientId=129893&RQT=309&VName=PQD
Sources-http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?
did=1948492671&sid=3&Fmt=3&clientId=129893&RQT=309&VName=PQD
ARTICLE#5-AUDITING LEADERSHIP: THE PROFESSIONAL AND
LEADERSHIP SKILLS YOU NEED
Curtis C Verschoor. Internal Auditing. Boston: Jan/Feb 2010. Vol. 25
Summary-Auditing Leadership: The Professional and Leadership Skills You
Need, by Brian D. Kush, is reviewed. The scope of topics covered is considerable,
ranging from better use of e-mail communications to accountability and planning for
your future. While some passages are more applicable to external auditing and
others to internal auditing, the majority of the discussion deals with issues of
importance to all auditors.
Sources-http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?
did=1983914151&sid=4&Fmt=3&clientId=129893&RQT=309&VName=PQD
Abstract (Summary)
Sources:-http://lea.sagepub.com/content/6/3/243.abstract
1. Daved Barry
1. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark and Universidade Nova de Lisboa,
Portugal, davedbarry@gmail.com
1. Stefan Meisiek
1. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark and Universidade Nova de Lisboa,
Portugal
Abstract
In this paper we attempt to bring art and craft together in the enterprise of leadership, first
by reframing the art of leadership in light of fine art thinking, and then joining it to notions
of craft. With this, we develop an approach to leadership where artistry is closely
dependent on, yet distinct from, craft. Finally, we discuss the ramifications of this
perspective for leadership practice and research.
Abstract
Abstract
Comparing leaders to actors has a long tradition, and researchers and practitioners in
the organizational field have tried to learn lessons from theatre. For developing this
approach, this article takes an interdisciplinary theatre studies perspective and
discusses how leaders in organizations compare to actors in the theatre. It makes the
assertion that the actor’s role in (dramatic, epic and postdramatic) theatre over
several historic epochs can be seen as a complementary, opposed practice that
confronts and challenges audiences rather than ‘playing to them’. Theatre does not
provide us with ideal or charismatic leader characters but, quite the opposite, teaches
us about contentious and problematic heroes. Theatre presents a fundamental
Sdisrespect for tenability and positive affirmation and may offer more critical ideas
about aesthetic interaction, leadership performance and leader-follower interaction.
This illustrates that aesthetic features do not alone turn leadership into an art.
‘Leadership as an art’ through this lens includes critical interaction through
increased aesthetic awareness from the viewpoint of followers.
Sources:-http://lea.sagepub.com/content/4/4/419.abstract
This article aims to challenge some of the assumptions which we make in our
understanding of leadership, through empirical illustration from a large organization
where a chief executive endeavours to ‘lead’ global change. The continuing search
for the Holy Grail, which seems to characterize interest in leadership, implies that
research efforts are perhaps being directed at ‘solving the wrong problem’.
Leadership as a form of social influence is hard to distinguish from many other
influences in relationships between people yet, it is argued, its emphasis on moving
towards future action encourages a conception not dissimilar to organizing. The case
analysis developed in this article goes on to reframe leadership as an example of
sensemaking. It concludes that while sensemaking will never replace leadership as a
focus or topic of interest, to understand leadership as a sensemaking process helps
illustrate more clearly what happens in the daily doing of leading.
Sources:- http://lea.sagepub.com/content/6/3/279.abstract
Abstract
In this article I explore the idea that leadership as art is characterized by leaders staying with their
senses, rather than drawing on yesterday’s sense-making, and by sense-making being received
through the senses rather than produced through an analytical process. Two simple models
illustrating these opposing processes are suggested, showing how drawing sense-making from
present sensing allows for greater flexibility in the assumptions we base our decisions on, and that
this process cannot be done by using our conceptual mind. Key elements in this exploration are the
distinction between sense-making and describing sense-making, and placing sensing at the centre
of sense-making. I compare leaders to conceptual artists due to similarities in the mediums with
which they work, and I discuss some practical implications for leadership.
Sources:- http://lea.sagepub.com/content/6/3/279.abstract
1. Ralph Bathurst
1. Massey University, New Zealand, R.Bathurst@massey.ac.nz
1. Brad Jackson
1. The University of Auckland Business School, New Zealand
1. Matt Statler
1. New York University, USA
Abstract
‘Leading Aesthetically’ highlights the processes by which leaders can inspire and motivate using
sense perceptions that go beyond rational, objective, communication. In this article, we contribute
to the theoretical development of aesthetic leadership by drawing on phenomenologist Roman
Ingarden’s notions of presencing and concretization; backward reflexivity; attention to both form
and content; and myth-making. We illustrate the particular relevance of these theoretical concepts
to leadership in conditions of uncertainty and crisis by discussing the case of Hurricane Katrina’s
impacts on New Orleans in 2005. The article concludes that aesthetically-aware leaders are able to
deploy a range of intellectual and emotional skills that can complement more conventional
rational-instrumental decision-making approaches in ways that can have considerable benefits in
times of uncertainty, and most especially in crisis situations.
ABSTRACT
Almost everywhere we turn, trust is on the decline. Trust in our culture at large, in our institutions,
and in our companies is significantly lower than a generation ago. Research shows that only 49%
of employees trust senior management, and only 28% believe CEOs are a credible source of
information. Consider the loss of trust and confidence in the financial markets today. Indeed, "trust
makes the world go 'round," and right now we're experiencing a crisis of trust. This crisis compels
us to ask three questions. First, is there a measurable cost to low trust? Second, is there a tangible
benefit to high trust? Third, how can the best leaders build trust in and within their organizations to
reap the benefits of high trust?
Most people don't know how to think about the organizational and societal consequences of low
trust because they don't know how to quantify or measure the costs of such a so-called "soft" factor
as trust. For many, trust is intangible, ethereal, unquantifiable. If it remains that way, then people
don't know how to get their arms around it or how to improve it. But the fact is, the costs of low
trust are very real, they are quantifiable, and they are staggering.
In 2004, one estimate put the cost of complying with federal rules and regulations alone in the
United States -- put in place essentially due to lack of trust -- at $1.1 trillion, which is more than
10% of the gross domestic product. A recent study conducted by the Association of Certified
Fraud Examiners estimated that the average American company lost 6% of its annual revenue to
some sort of fraudulent activity. Research shows similar effects for the other disguised low-trust
taxes as well.
Think about it this way: When trust is low, in a company or in a relationship, it places a hidden
"tax" on every transaction: every communication, every interaction, every strategy, every decision
is taxed, bringing speed down and sending costs up. My experience is that significant distrust
doubles the cost of doing business and triples the time it takes to get things done.
By contrast, individuals and organizations that have earned and operate with high trust experience
the opposite of a tax -- a "dividend" that is like a performance multiplier, enabling them to succeed
in their communications, interactions, and decisions, and to move with incredible speed. A recent
Watson Wyatt study showed that high trust companies outperform low trust companies by nearly
300%!
I contend that the ability to establish, grow, extend, and (where needed) restore trust among
stakeholders is the critical competency of leadership needed today. It is needed more than any
other competency. Engendering trust is, in fact, a competency that can be learned, applied, and
understood. It is something that you can get good at, something you can measure and improve,
something for which you can "move the needle." You cannot be an effective leader without trust.
As Warren Bennis put it, "Leadership without mutual trust is a contradiction in terms."
Abstract
Ethical integrity and moral culture are defined, and ethical integrity in leadership,
ethical dilemmas and failures, and organizational moral culture are examined. These
views are measured against a number of case studies to determine whether there are
linkages between organizational moral culture and the ethical or unethical integrity
of leadership. A number of conclusions are drawn from the case studies. There
appears to be a direct link between ethical leadership and organizational moral
culture, although in some cases, considerable time may be needed to change the
moral culture of an organization. Shareholders and the public appreciate and reward
organizations with high ethical principles and moral culture whereas regulators are
increasingly taking legal action against companies which flout share-holders' and the
public's trust. The article questions whether codes of conduct, regular performance
and audit reviews or other mechanisms to maintain ethics inhibit employees' right to
moral autonomy. Finally, it is noted that inconsistencies exist in correlating private
standards and behaviour as important predictors or determinants of ethical business
conduct.
Abstract:
This study was designed to help understand what effective managers really do.
Unlike previous research on managerial effectiveness, a diverse sample (N = 78) of
managers was directly observed in natural settings. These data on managerial
activities gathered by trained observers were related to a subordinate-report measure
of unit effectiveness. Using canonical correlation analysis, a descriptive model of
managerial effectiveness was derived. This one-dimensional model consists of a
continuum ranging from a quantity-oriented human resource manager (who was
observed to exhibit considerable staffing and motivating or reinforcing activities and
was perceived to have quantity performance in the unit) to quality- oriented
traditional manager (who was observed to exhibit a lot of interaction with outsiders,
controlling and planning activities, and was perceived to have quality performance
in the unit). This empirically derived descriptive model helps identify needed
managerial activities and skills for quantity and quality performance in today's
organizations.
johnk@ce-asia.com
Annie Wong
anniew@ce-asia.com
ANALYSIS-
Developing leadership credibility is an important component of .With that in mind,
here are three secrets to developing leadership skills in a manner that will produce
results. First, be honest. Yes, that sounds obvious. Leader should be honest
because we see too many cases people making a run for a leadership position
without a commitment to that principle. While white lies may be temporarily
effective, honesty is and will always be the best policy. Second, show your
commitment to the job. People believe in leaders when they think those leaders can
relate to them. . Leaders who spend too much time insulated from the "real world"
have a harder time motivating people than do those who have spent time in the
trenches with their followers. Third, remember that developing leadership comes
with responsibility. That is also important developing leadership point of view As
you have your skills and use them, consistently demonstrate a commitment to
leading others in the right direction and looking out for your followers best interests.
attempting to develop authentic leaders may only develop leaders who are better
able to express an image of authenticity. Until a viable definition is proposed, a
measurement method is developed, and criterion-related research is published,
organizations are advised to explore authentic leadership with caution.
ANALYSIS-
In this articles briefly described about aspects of developing leadership in a
organization that how to boost your leadership as we know that great leaders are
made, not born. If we want to improve your ability to lead, where should you focus
our attention? Why are certain leadership talents more important than others? we
would want to effectively plan a strategy or generate purposeful agenda to meet the
challenges of our daily situations. That’s why we need more leadership skills to
meet the challenges Having more leadershp skills means we have More options,
styles and capabilities to choose from ,More approaches to evaluating or solving
your "problems", More opportunities to innovate. next we must know what types of
situations do you face, how will your leadership skills be applied?Will lead a
special or critical one-time project? Will we lead others who directly report to you or
are under your direct influence?Will we lead people who are outside we sphere of
control .we must focus your attention on providing service through weleadership. To
look at leadership in this light, you will need to know what types of leadership
service are required: Should we style be dictating or nurturing; Should more of your
time be spent listening and observing;Should our behavior be motivating or
modeling;Should our role be instructing and so on.
ARTICLE#20-Managerial effectiveness: a function of personality
type and organisational components.
Abstruct
Developing leadership culture all starts with you and all your colleagues
in senior leadership .Three statements can be pointed that would not
find in the treatment of change .First ,in this new world order ,your new
work as a leader is about developing culture and talents not about
assigning it to someone else that all culture development & change
starts with you. Second ,the key to successful transformation is doing
the work in the senior leadership culture first before taking the change
to middle of the organization..Third ,transformation is serious it work for
serious people, it is about getting bigger minds to deal with attachments
bigger and complex issues that will continue to confront you, your
leadership and your organization.
Developing leadership culture all starts with you and all your colleagues
in senior leadership .Three statements can be pointed that would not
find in the treatment of change .First ,in this new world order ,your new
work as a leader is about developing culture and talents not about
assigning it to someone else that all culture development & change
starts with you. Second ,the key to successful transformation is doing
the work in the senior leadership culture first before taking the change
to middle of the organization..Third ,transformation is serious it work for
serious people. It is about getting bigger minds to deal with attachments
bigger and complex issues that will continue to confront you, your
leadership and your organization.
• www.johnadair.co.uk/articles/Developingtomorrowsleaders.pdf
• www.cluteinstitute-onlinejournals.com/PDFs/653.pdf
• www.scribd.com/doc/16508600/Developing-Leadership-Skill
• www.apsc.gov.au/leadership/csiro.pdf
• www.career-success-for-newbies.com/developing-leadership-skills.html
• www.oxfordleadership.com/Experiential_Leadership_Development_Survey_2
009
• www.sideroad.com › Business › Leadership
• http://changingminds.org/disciplines/leadership/styles/charismatic_leadershi
p.htm
• http://managementhelp.org/ldrship/ldrship.htm
• http://managingleadership.com/blog/2004/07/15/what-is-organizational-
leadership/