Detailed Project Report Development of Industrial Area,: at Piparsewa, Dist - Morena

Detailed Project Report on Development of External and internal Services ARG Tech.
Industrial Area, Piparsewa, Morena
Detailed Project Report

of
Development of Industrial Area,
At Piparsewa, Dist.Morena.
January 2017
V o l u m e 3- Design Volume
Prepared For:
INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION (GWALIOIR) M.P. LTD.,
(A Govt. of M.P. undertaking Subsidiary of MP TRIFAC, Bhopal)
IIDC Plaza, 39-City Centre, Gwalior-474011 (M.P.)
E-mail :iidcgwalior@gmail.com Web. : www.iidcgwalior.com
Phone : 0751-2426614, 2374506, Fax : 0751-2375145
Consultants:
Arg Technocrats
www.argtechnocrats.com
A-35, Sector 63, Noida-
201307, India
Tel.: +91-120– 6783600-
10, Fax: +91-120-6783699
Fax:
Detailed Project Report on Development of External and internal Services ARG Tech.
Industrial Area, Piparsewa, Morena
Detailed Project Report

on
Development of Industrial Area
At Piparsewa Morena.
December 2016
INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION (GWALIOIR) M.P. LTD.,
(A Govt. of M.P. undertaking Subsidiary of MP TRIFAC, Bhopal)
IIDC Plaza, 39-City Centre, Gwalior-474011 (M.P.)
E-mail :iidcgwalior@gmail.com Web. : www.iidcgwalior.com
Phone : 0751-2426614, 2374506, Fax : 0751-2375145

Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description
Consultants:
Arg Technocrats
www.argtechnocrats.com
A-35, Sector 63, Noida-201307, India
This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any
other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Arg
Technocrats being obtained. Arg Technocrats accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document
being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the
document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify
Arg Technocrats for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Arg Technocrats accepts no responsibility or liability for this
document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned.
To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Arg Technocrats accepts no liability for any
loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data
supplied by parties other than Arg Technocrats and used by Arg Technocrats in preparing this report.
IRC:58-2015 Guidelines for Design of
Plain Jointed Rigid Pavements for Highways
Approach of Design of Slab Thickness for Pavement
(with and without doweled transverse joints. Beta value will be 0.66 for doweled joint and 0.90 for without dowels case)
Type of pavement considered Pavement Structural Details
2-lane UN
Carriageway Modulus of subgrade reaction of subgrade, MPa/m 50.3
divided
Thickness of Granular Subbase, mm 200
Shoulders :- Tied concrete shoulders ? (yes/no) NO Thickness of Dry Lean Concrete subbase, mm 100
Effective modulus of subgrade reaction of foundation,

Transverse joint spacing (m) 4 285
MPa/m
Lane width (m) 3.5 Unit weight of Concrete, kN/m 3 24
Transverse Joints have dowel bars? (yes/no) yes 28-day Flexural strength of cement concrete, MPa 4.5
Max. day-time Temperature Differential in slab, 0C (for
Design Traffic Estimation 16.8
bottom-up cracking)
Night-time Temperature Differential in slab, 0C (for top-
Design Period (years) 30 13.4
down cracking) = day-time diff/2 + 5
Total Two-way Commercial Traffic (cvpd) in the year of
1000 Trial Thickness of Concrete Slab, m 0.28
completion of construction
Av. Annual rate of growth of commercial traffic Load Transfer Efficiency Factor for TDC analysis, Beta = 0.66
7.50% 0.66
(expressed as decimal) for dowel Joints, 0.90 for joints without dowels
Cumulative No of Commercial vehicles during design
37740782 Elastic Modulus of Concrete, Ec (MPa) 30000
period (two-way), A
Average No of axles per commercial vehicle, B 5 Poisson's Ratio of Concrete, Mu 0.15
Cumulative No of Commercial Axles during design
188703910 Radius of relative stiffness, m 0.66621
period (two-way), C = A*B
Proportion of traffic in predominant direction (For 2-
0.50 Design Axle Load Repetitions for Fatigue Analysis
lane 2-way highways use a value of 1.0), D
Lateral Placement factor (0.25 for 2-lane 2-way. For
0.250 For Bottom-up Cracking Analysis
multilane highways the value is 0.25 X C), E
Factor for selection of traffic for BUC analysis (for six-
0.2 Front single (steering) Axles = H * K1 4245838
hour period during day), F
Factor for selection of traffic for TDC analysis (for six-
0.3 Rear single Axles = H * K2 1415279
hour period during day), G
Design axle repetitions for BUC analysis (for 6 hour day
9435195 Tandem Axles = H * K3 2358799
time traffic), H = B*E*F
Proportion of vehicles with spacing between front and
the first rear axle less than the spacing of transverse 0.55 Tridem Axles = H * K4 1415279
joints, I
Design axle repetitions for TDC analysis (for 6-hour night
7784036 For Top-Down Cracking Analysis
time traffic), J = B*E*G*I
Proportion of Front single (steering) Axles, K1 0.450 Front single (steering) Axles = J * K1 3502816
Proportion of Rear single Axles,K2 0.150 Rear single Axles = J * K2 1167605
Proportion of tandem Axles, K3 0.250 Tandem Axles = J * K3 1946009
Proportion of Tridem Axles, K4 = (1-K1-K2-K3) 0.150 Tridem Axles = J * K4 1167605
Fatigue Damage Analysis
Axle Load Spectrum Data Bottom-up Cracking Fatigue Analysis for Day-time (6 hour) traffic and
Top-Down Cracking Fatigue Analysis for Night-time (6 hour) traffic and Negative Temperature Differential
Positive Temperature Differential
Rear Tandem Axles Rear Tridem Axles

Rear Single Axle Rear Tandem Axle Rear Tridem Axle Rear Single Axles Rear Tandem Axles Rear Single Axles
(Stess computed for 50% of axle load) (Stress computed for 33% of axle load)
Load Mid-Point of Mid-Point of Load Mid-Point of Expected Flex Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Flex Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Flex Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Flex Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Flex Allowable Fatigue
Frequency Load Group Frequency Frequency Stress
Group Load Group Load Group Group Load Group Repetitions Stress Ratio Repetitions Damage Repetitions Stress Ratio Repetitions Damage Repetitions Stress Ratio Repetition Damage Repetitions Stress Ratio Repetitions Damage Repetitions Stress Repetitions Damage
(%) (kN) (%) (%) Ratio (SR)
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (ni) MPa (SR) (Ni) (ni/Ni) (ni) MPa (SR) (Ni) (ni/Ni) (ni) MPa (SR) s (Ni) (ni/Ni) (ni) MPa (SR) (Ni) (ni/Ni) (ni) MPa (Ni) (ni/Ni)
185-195 190 18.15 380 - 400 390 14.5 530-560 545 5.23 256873 3.133 0.633 12386 20.739 342026 2.6362 0.533 210544.226 1.624 211920 2.399 0.485 1768731 0.120 282171 2.4269 0.490 1267085 0.223 61066 2.35286 0.475 3370878 0.018
175-185 180 17.43 360 - 380 370 10.5 500-530 515 4.85 246683 3.013 0.609 24332 10.138 247674 2.5399 0.513 426622.389 0.581 203514 2.344 0.473 3899961 0.052 204331 2.3714 0.479 2564487 0.080 56629 2.29736 0.464 9089367 0.006
165-175 170 18.27 340 - 360 350 3.63 470-500 485 3.44 258572 2.892 0.584 47801 5.409 85624 2.4436 0.494 1051548.06 0.081 213322 2.288 0.462 11091781 0.019 70640 2.3159 0.468 6308978 0.011 40166 2.24187 0.453 38025932 0.001
155-165 160 12.98 320 - 340 330 2.5 440-470 455 7.12 183703 2.772 0.560 93905 1.956 58970 2.3474 0.474 3671404.76 0.016 151555 2.233 0.451 52048021 0.003 48650 2.2604 0.457 21946523 0.002 83134 2.18637 0.442 infinite 0.000
145-155 150 2.98 300 - 320 310 2.69 410-440 425 10.11 42175 2.652 0.536 189818 0.222 63452 2.2511 0.455 28539065.4 0.002 34795 2.177 0.440 infinite 0.000 52348 2.2049 0.445 infinite 0.000 118045 2.13088 0.430 infinite 0.000
135-145 140 1.62 280 - 300 290 1.26 380-410 395 12.01 22928 2.532 0.511 455745 0.050 29721 2.1549 0.435 infinite 0.000 18915 2.122 0.429 infinite 0.000 24520 2.1494 0.434 infinite 0.000 140229 2.07538 0.419 infinite 0.000
105-115 110 2.65 220 - 240 230 6.3 290-320 305 4.55 37505 2.171 0.439 infinite 0.000 148604 1.8661 0.377 infinite 0.000 30942 1.955 0.395 infinite 0.000 122599 1.9829 0.401 infinite 0.000 53126 1.90889 0.386 infinite 0.000
< 85 80 14.15 < 180 170 34.23 < 230 215 17.58 200262 1.811 0.366 infinite 0.000 807417 1.5774 0.319 infinite 0.000 165216 1.789 0.361 infinite 0.000 666119 1.8164 0.367 infinite 0.000 205265 1.7424 0.352 infinite 0.000
100 100 100 1415279 Fat Dam from Sing. Axles = 38.543 2358799 Fat Dam from Tand Axles = 2.305 1167605 Fat Dam from Sing. Axles = 0.194 1946009 Fat Dam from Tand Axles = 0.316 1167605 Fat Dam from Tridem Axles = 0.025
Total Bottom-up Fatigue Damage due to single and

38.543 + 2.305 = 40.848 Total Top-Down Fatigue Damage = 0.194 + 0.316 + 0.025 = 0.535
tandem axle loads =
Front Single Axles and Rear Tridem axles not considered for bottom-up analysis
Sum of CFD for BUC & TDC= 41.383 DESIGN IS UNSAFE SINCE SUM OF CFD FOR BUC AND TDC>1
Design for Bonded Pavement Option
Subgrade CBR (%)= 5 Trial Slab thickness (m) over DLC, h1 0.3 Poisson's Ratio of DLC, m2 0.2 Total Flexural Stiffness Provided = 75.40 + 19.92 = 95.32
Granular Subabse Thickness (mm) = 200 Provide DLC thickness (m), h2 0.1 Depth to Neutral axis, m (See Fig.6) 0.18 which is more than the Flexural Stiffness of the Design Slab = 69.05
Effective k-value from Tables 2 and 3 (MPa/m) = 42.0 Elastic Modulus of Pavement Concrete (MPa), E1 30000 Flex Stiffness of design Slab 69.05 Hence, Provide a Slab of thickness (m) 0.3 over DLC of thickness (m) 0.1
For k of 42.0 MPa/m and for Elastic Modulus of DLC (MPa), E2 13600 Flex Stiffness of Partial Slab Provided 75.40 Slab thickness (h1) over DLC layer may be obtained by iteratively changing h1 and matching the
Doweled Joint and Tied Concrete Shoulders, Slab Thickness (m) = 0.3 Poisson's Ratio of Paving Concrete, m1 0.15 Flex Stiffness of DLC 19.92 design stiffness with the combined stiffness provided
IRC:58-2015 Guidelines for Design of
Plain Jointed Rigid Pavements for Highways
Approach of Design of Slab Thickness for Pavement
(with and without doweled transverse joints. Beta value will be 0.66 for doweled joint and 0.90 for without dowels case)
Type of pavement considered Pavement Structural Details
2-lane UN
Carriageway Modulus of subgrade reaction of subgrade, MPa/m 50.3
divided
Thickness of Granular Subbase, mm 250
Shoulders :- Tied concrete shoulders ? (yes/no) NO Thickness of Dry Lean Concrete subbase, mm 100
Effective modulus of subgrade reaction of foundation,

Transverse joint spacing (m) 4 285
MPa/m
Lane width (m) 3.5 Unit weight of Concrete, kN/m 3 24
Transverse Joints have dowel bars? (yes/no) yes 28-day Flexural strength of cement concrete, MPa 4.5
Max. day-time Temperature Differential in slab, 0C (for
Design Traffic Estimation 16.8
bottom-up cracking)
Night-time Temperature Differential in slab, 0C (for top-
Design Period (years) 30 13.4
down cracking) = day-time diff/2 + 5
Total Two-way Commercial Traffic (cvpd) in the year of
1000 Trial Thickness of Concrete Slab, m 0.28
completion of construction
Av. Annual rate of growth of commercial traffic Load Transfer Efficiency Factor for TDC analysis, Beta = 0.66
7.50% 0.66
(expressed as decimal) for dowel Joints, 0.90 for joints without dowels
Cumulative No of Commercial vehicles during design
37740782 Elastic Modulus of Concrete, Ec (MPa) 30000
period (two-way), A
Average No of axles per commercial vehicle, B 5 Poisson's Ratio of Concrete, Mu 0.15
Cumulative No of Commercial Axles during design
188703910 Radius of relative stiffness, m 0.66621
period (two-way), C = A*B
Proportion of traffic in predominant direction (For 2-
0.50 Design Axle Load Repetitions for Fatigue Analysis
lane 2-way highways use a value of 1.0), D
Lateral Placement factor (0.25 for 2-lane 2-way. For
0.250 For Bottom-up Cracking Analysis
multilane highways the value is 0.25 X C), E
Factor for selection of traffic for BUC analysis (for six-
0.2 Front single (steering) Axles = H * K1 4245838
hour period during day), F
Factor for selection of traffic for TDC analysis (for six-
0.3 Rear single Axles = H * K2 1415279
hour period during day), G
Design axle repetitions for BUC analysis (for 6 hour day
9435195 Tandem Axles = H * K3 2358799
time traffic), H = B*E*F
Proportion of vehicles with spacing between front and
the first rear axle less than the spacing of transverse 0.55 Tridem Axles = H * K4 1415279
joints, I
Design axle repetitions for TDC analysis (for 6-hour night
7784036 For Top-Down Cracking Analysis
time traffic), J = B*E*G*I
Proportion of Front single (steering) Axles, K1 0.450 Front single (steering) Axles = J * K1 3502816
Proportion of Rear single Axles,K2 0.150 Rear single Axles = J * K2 1167605
Proportion of tandem Axles, K3 0.250 Tandem Axles = J * K3 1946009
Proportion of Tridem Axles, K4 = (1-K1-K2-K3) 0.150 Tridem Axles = J * K4 1167605
Fatigue Damage Analysis
Axle Load Spectrum Data Bottom-up Cracking Fatigue Analysis for Day-time (6 hour) traffic and
Top-Down Cracking Fatigue Analysis for Night-time (6 hour) traffic and Negative Temperature Differential
Positive Temperature Differential
Rear Tandem Axles Rear Tridem Axles

Rear Single Axle Rear Tandem Axle Rear Tridem Axle Rear Single Axles Rear Tandem Axles Rear Single Axles
(Stess computed for 50% of axle load) (Stress computed for 33% of axle load)
Load Mid-Point of Mid-Point of Load Mid-Point of Expected Flex Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Flex Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Flex Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Flex Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Flex Allowable Fatigue
Frequency Load Group Frequency Frequency Stress
Group Load Group Load Group Group Load Group Repetitions Stress Ratio Repetitions Damage Repetitions Stress Ratio Repetitions Damage Repetitions Stress Ratio Repetition Damage Repetitions Stress Ratio Repetitions Damage Repetitions Stress Repetitions Damage
(%) (kN) (%) (%) Ratio (SR)
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (ni) MPa (SR) (Ni) (ni/Ni) (ni) MPa (SR) (Ni) (ni/Ni) (ni) MPa (SR) s (Ni) (ni/Ni) (ni) MPa (SR) (Ni) (ni/Ni) (ni) MPa (Ni) (ni/Ni)
185-195 190 18.15 380 - 400 390 14.5 530-560 545 5.23 256873 3.133 0.633 12386 20.739 342026 2.6362 0.533 210544.226 1.624 211920 2.399 0.485 1768731 0.120 282171 2.4269 0.490 1267085 0.223 61066 2.35286 0.475 3370878 0.018
175-185 180 17.43 360 - 380 370 10.5 500-530 515 4.85 246683 3.013 0.609 24332 10.138 247674 2.5399 0.513 426622.389 0.581 203514 2.344 0.473 3899961 0.052 204331 2.3714 0.479 2564487 0.080 56629 2.29736 0.464 9089367 0.006
165-175 170 18.27 340 - 360 350 3.63 470-500 485 3.44 258572 2.892 0.584 47801 5.409 85624 2.4436 0.494 1051548.06 0.081 213322 2.288 0.462 11091781 0.019 70640 2.3159 0.468 6308978 0.011 40166 2.24187 0.453 38025932 0.001
155-165 160 12.98 320 - 340 330 2.5 440-470 455 7.12 183703 2.772 0.560 93905 1.956 58970 2.3474 0.474 3671404.76 0.016 151555 2.233 0.451 52048021 0.003 48650 2.2604 0.457 21946523 0.002 83134 2.18637 0.442 infinite 0.000
145-155 150 2.98 300 - 320 310 2.69 410-440 425 10.11 42175 2.652 0.536 189818 0.222 63452 2.2511 0.455 28539065.4 0.002 34795 2.177 0.440 infinite 0.000 52348 2.2049 0.445 infinite 0.000 118045 2.13088 0.430 infinite 0.000
< 85 80 14.15 < 180 170 34.23 < 230 215 17.58 200262 1.811 0.366 infinite 0.000 807417 1.5774 0.319 infinite 0.000 165216 1.789 0.361 infinite 0.000 666119 1.8164 0.367 infinite 0.000 205265 1.7424 0.352 infinite 0.000
100 100 100 1415279 Fat Dam from Sing. Axles = 38.543 2358799 Fat Dam from Tand Axles = 2.305 1167605 Fat Dam from Sing. Axles = 0.194 1946009 Fat Dam from Tand Axles = 0.316 1167605 Fat Dam from Tridem Axles = 0.025
Total Bottom-up Fatigue Damage due to single and

38.543 + 2.305 = 40.848 Total Top-Down Fatigue Damage = 0.194 + 0.316 + 0.025 = 0.535
tandem axle loads =
Front Single Axles and Rear Tridem axles not considered for bottom-up analysis
Sum of CFD for BUC & TDC= 41.383 DESIGN IS UNSAFE SINCE SUM OF CFD FOR BUC AND TDC>1
Design for Bonded Pavement Option
Subgrade CBR (%)= 5 Trial Slab thickness (m) over DLC, h1 0.3 Poisson's Ratio of DLC, m2 0.2 Total Flexural Stiffness Provided = 75.40 + 19.92 = 95.32
Granular Subabse Thickness (mm) = 250 Provide DLC thickness (m), h2 0.1 Depth to Neutral axis, m (See Fig.6) 0.18 which is more than the Flexural Stiffness of the Design Slab = 69.05
Effective k-value from Tables 2 and 3 (MPa/m) = 42.0 Elastic Modulus of Pavement Concrete (MPa), E1 30000 Flex Stiffness of design Slab 69.05 Hence, Provide a Slab of thickness (m) 0.3 over DLC of thickness (m) 0.1
For k of 42.0 MPa/m and for Elastic Modulus of DLC (MPa), E2 13600 Flex Stiffness of Partial Slab Provided 75.40 Slab thickness (h1) over DLC layer may be obtained by iteratively changing h1 and matching the
Doweled Joint and Tied Concrete Shoulders, Slab Thickness (m) = 0.3 Poisson's Ratio of Paving Concrete, m1 0.15 Flex Stiffness of DLC 19.92 design stiffness with the combined stiffness provided
Design of Drain Section0.6M X 0.8M For maximum length
Sl.No. Data Type Value Reference
100mm per hour for 25 year

01 Design Rainfall As per IRC: SP-42, Fig-B, Page-24
return Period
02 Value of Co-efficient of Run-off PI:
a) for bituminous/paved surface 0.90
As per Table-2 of IRC: SP-42, page-

b) turfed shoulder with road slope 0.30 20
impervious claey soils with

c) 0.50
vegetative cover
As per Table-4.2 of IRC: SP-50,
d) Moderately Built up Area 0.70
page-1
03 Width of Catchment Area (W)
(3.50m CW + 2.5m shoulder + 0.0m

a) paved Surface (m) 6.00 half the median including kerb shy)
on either side
(1.0m earthen shoulder + 3.0 m

b) turfed shoulder and road slope 4.00
earthen slope surface)
unpaved claey surface with (15m half the ROW- 3.5m-2.50m-1)

c) 5.00
vegetative cover on either side
d) Built up Area 55.00 100m on either side
04 Length of Catchment Area 'L' 300.00 from ch- to ch-
A= L x b= 300*(6+4+5+55)
05 Area of Catchment Area 'A' 2.10
/10000=2.1Ha
Average co-efficient of Run-off

06 0.68 Pav= ∑wn.cn/∑wn
Pav
07 Mannings co-efficient 'n' 0.02 for concrete lined drain
Time of entry of flow to drains

08 'tc' from the remotest point of 0.03
water shed in hours
tc= time of flow in hours.
ARG Technocrats
L= distance of critical point to

drain in km =0.05 km
H= level diff. between critical point
and drain in m = 1.05m
09 Drain size considerd 0.6m x 0.8 m bxd
10 Wetted perimeter 'P' 2.20 full condition =0.6 + 2*0.8=2.2m
11 Area of cros-section 'A' 0.48 full condition =0.6*0.8=0.48 SQm
12 Hydraulic Radius 'R' 0.22 R= A/P
2/3
13 R 0.36
14 Slope of the drain 'S' 0.005
0.5
15 S 0.07
16 Mean Velocity of flow m/sec 1.59 v= 1/n x S0.5 x R2/3
Time of concentration for =length of the drain section/ velocity

17 0.04
disposal point 'tf' in hr. of flow/3600
Max. Intensity of rainfall 'Ic' in F T  1

Ic 
18 cm/hr for durations of 0.5 hrs. 18.69 T  t  1 
during 100mm/hr storm
F=10cm, T=.5 hr, t= tc+tf = 0.07 hr
Peak discharge run-off 'Q' in
19 0.75 Q=0.028PAIc
cumsec
Discharge capacity of drain in
20 0.76 Section is safe
cumsec.
21 Maximum Allowable velocity 6.00 As per IRC: SP-42
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
0.60 m x 0.800 m
0.900 m
0.80 m 1.000 m
0.15 m 0.150 m
0.60 m Drain Base Width (Clear) 0.60 m
Drain Height (Clear) 0.80 m
Wall Thickness 0.15 m
Base Thickness 0.20 m
0.200 m Top Slab Thickness 0.00 m
0.900 m
0.375 m 0.375 m
0.750 m
Self weight of Earth = 2.00t/m3

Self weight of Concrete = 2.50t/m3 (IRC: 6 - 2010)
Grade of Concrete = M 20
Allowable Bending Stress scbc = 6.67 MPa (Table 9 IRC 21-2000)
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Allowable stress in Steel = 240 MPa (Table 10 IRC 21-2000)
Modular Ratio m = 10 (Note 1Table 9 IRC 21-2000)
n Neutral Axis depth factor = 0.217
j Leverarm factor = 0.928
Q Moment of Resistance factor = = 0.67 MPa
1 LOAD CALCULATION
1) Dead load
Wall
UDL of Vertical Walls 0.15 x 2.5 = in t/sq. m = = 0.375
Height of wall = 0.80 m
Weight of wall = 0.300 t/m
Base slab
UDL of Base Slab = 0.2 x 2.5 = 0.5
Length of slab = 0.90 m
Load = 0.45 t/m
0.075 m 0.075 m
0.750 m 0.900 m
0.30 t 0.30 t
0.000 t 0.000 t
0.50 t/m
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
0.60 m x 0.800 m
2) Earth Pressure
Density of Soil = 2.0 t/m3

Angle of Internal Friction = 30 º
Surcharge Angle b = 0º
Wall Angle a = 90 º
SBC = 10 t/m2
Angle of Wall Friction d = 20 º
sin2 (   ) cos 1
Ka  x
sin2  sin( -  )  sin(   ) sin( -  ) 
2
1  
 sin( -  ) sin(   ) 
Earth pressure Coefficient = 0.279 (IRC 6-2010 Cl. 217.1 )

Hence, Pressure at base of box = 0.502 t/m
Surcharge Height = 1.20 m (IRC 6-2010 Cl. 217.1 )
Pressure on Wall (1.2 x 0.279 x 2 ) = 0.67 t/m
settlement = 40 mm
2
Spring constant = 250.0 t/m per m width
No of Springs to be provided = 10 Nos
spring constant at end supports = 9.375 t/m depth per m width
spring constant at intermediate supports (adjacent to end support) = 20.089 t/m depth per m width
spring constant at intermediate supports = 21.429 t/m depth per m width
0.000
0.603 t
0.45 m 0.900 m
0.50m
0.38 m
0.502 t/m 0.67 t/m 0.67 t/m 0.50 t/m

Earth Surcharge 0.750 m Surcharge Earth
Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure
DL+SIDL
STAAD PLANE FRAME ANALYSIS FOR DRAIN OF SIZE 0.75 X 0.9
UNITS MTONS METERS
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.750 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.900 0.00
3 0.750 0.900 0.00
5 0.075 0.00 0.00
6 0.675 0.00 0.00
7 0.750 0.100 0.00
8 0.00 0.100 0.00
9 0.161 0.00 0.00
10 0.246 0.00 0.00
11 0.332 0.00 0.00
12 0.418 0.00 0.00
13 0.504 0.00 0.00
14 0.589 0.00 0.00
MEMBER INCIDENCES
148
281
315
459
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
0.60 m x 0.800 m
5 9 10
6 10 11
7 11 12
8 12 13
9 13 14
10 14 6
11 6 2
12 7 2
13 3 7
MEMBER PROPERTIES
3 11 PRIS YD 0.2 ZD 1.0
4 to 10 PRIS YD 0.2 ZD 1.0
1 13 PRIS YD 0.15 ZD 1.0
2 12 PRIS YD 0.15 ZD 1.0
CONSTANTS
E CONCRETE ALL
POISSON CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
1 2 FIXED BUT FX FZ MX MY MZ KFY 9.375
9 TO 14 FIXED BUT FX FZ MX MY MZ KFY 21.429
LOAD 1 DEAD LOADS
MEMBER LOADS
3 TO 11 UNI GY -0.500
3 CONC GY -0.000 0.075
11 CONC GY -0.000 0.000
1 13 CONC GY -0.300
LOAD 2 EARTH PRESSURES
MEMBER LOADS
1 TRAP GX 0 0.446
2 TRAP GX 0.446 0.502
13 TRAP GX 0 -0.446
12 TRAP GX -0.446 -0.502
1 TO 2 UNI GX 0.670
12 TO 13 UNI GX -0.670
LOAD COMB 3 LOAD COMBINATION
1 1.0 2 1.0
PERFORM ANALYSIS
PRINT ANALYSIS RESULTS
PRINT FORCE ENVELOPE NS 10
FINISH
2 ANALYSIS RESULTS
Description Base Slab Walls

Sl. No.
Moment-tm SF-d dist-t Moment-tm SF-d dist-t
1 Dead Load+Earth Pressures 0.57 0.79 0.34 0.83
3 DESIGN OF DRAIN
Design constants
Allowable Bending Stress (scbc) = 6.67 MPa
Allowable stress in Steel = 240 MPa
modular Ratio (m) = 10
Neutral Axis depth factor (h) = 0.217
Leverarm factor (j) = 0.928
Moment of Resistance factor (Q) = 0.67 MPa
a) DESIGN OF BASE SLAB
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
0.60 m x 0.800 m
Total moment on base slab due to Moment-tm Shear-t MAX Moment with impact-tm
DL+Earth pressures 0.86 1.18
Net maximum moment on base slab = 0.86 t-m
Hence, Effective Depth required = 113.1 mm
Total Depth Provided = 200 mm
Effective Cover = 31 mm
Hence, Effective Depth provided = 169 mm > Required, Hence, OK
Area of steel to be provided = 228.61 mm²
Minimum area of steel = 0.12% = 202.80 mm²
Provide TOR 12 dia @ 150 mm c/c 754 mm² Percent = 0.45 %
Shear check
Max. SF = 1.18 t
Shear Stress = 0.070MPa
For this percentage of steel, the allowable shear stress from table 11B of Amendments to IRC:21-1987
= #NAME?
#NAME?
Distribution reinforcement = .2 DL Moment

= 0.17 t-m
Ast = 46.83 mm²
Provide 8 dia @ @ 1073mm Provide @ 150mm
b) DESIGN OF WALLS
Total moment on wall due to Moment-tm Shear-t Max Moment-tm

Net maximum moment on walls = 0.51 t-m

Hence, Effective Depth required = 87 mm

Shear check
Max. SF = 1.04 t
= #NAME?
#NAME?

= 0.10 t-m
Ast = 37.75 mm²
c) DESIGN OF TOP SLAB
Thickness of Top Slab = 0 mm

UDL of Top Slab = 0.000 t/m
Footpath Live Load as per IRC:6-2010 = 0.400 t/m
Total Load = 0.400 t/m
Span of Slab = 0.60 m
Bending Moment = 0.018 t-m
Effective Depth Required = 16.4 mm
Effective Depth Provided = -35 mm UNSAFE
Area of steel to be provided = -23.10 mm²
Minimum area of steel = 0.12% = -42.00 mm²
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
0.60 m x 0.800 m
Provide TOR 12 dia @ 125 mm c/c 904 mm² Percent = -2.58 %

= 0.00 t-m
Ast = -4.15 mm²
Provide 8 dia @ @ -12116mm Provide @ 200mm
ARG Technocrats
Design of Drain Section0.8M X 1M For maximum length

return Period


c) 0.50
vegetative cover
page-1

on either side


c) 5.00
A= L x b= 350*(6+4+5+100)
/10000=4.025Ha

06 0.69 Pav= ∑wn.cn/∑wn
Pav

water shed in hours
ARG Technocrats

09 Drain size considerd 0.8m x 1 m bxd
10 Wetted perimeter 'P' 2.80 full condition =0.8 + 2*1=2.8m
11 Area of cros-section 'A' 0.80 full condition =0.8*1=0.8 SQm
2/3
13 R 0.43
0.5
15 S 0.07

17 0.04

Ic 
F=10cm, T=.5 hr, t= tc+tf = 0.07 hr
19 1.45 Q=0.028PAIc
cumsec
cumsec.
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
0.80 m x 1.000 m
1.100 m
1.00 m 1.200 m
0.15 m 0.150 m
1.100 m
0.475 m 0.475 m
0.950 m

1 LOAD CALCULATION
1) Dead load
Wall
Base slab
UDL of Base Slab = 0.2 x 2.5 = 0.5
Load = 0.55 t/m
0.075 m 0.075 m
0.950 m 1.100 m
0.38 t 0.38 t
0.000 t 0.000 t
0.50 t/m
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
0.80 m x 1.000 m
2) Earth Pressure

SBC = 10 t/m2
sin2 (   ) cos 1
Ka  x
sin2  sin( -  )  sin(   ) sin( -  ) 
2
1  
 sin( -  ) sin(   ) 

settlement = 40 mm
2
0.000
0.737 t
0.55 m 1.100 m
0.61m
0.46 m
0.614 t/m 0.67 t/m 0.67 t/m 0.61 t/m

DL+SIDL
UNITS MTONS METERS
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.950 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 1.100 0.00
3 0.950 1.100 0.00
5 0.075 0.00 0.00
6 0.875 0.00 0.00
7 0.950 0.100 0.00
8 0.00 0.100 0.00
9 0.189 0.00 0.00
10 0.304 0.00 0.00
11 0.418 0.00 0.00
12 0.532 0.00 0.00
13 0.646 0.00 0.00
14 0.761 0.00 0.00
MEMBER INCIDENCES
148
281
315
459
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
0.80 m x 1.000 m
5 9 10
6 10 11
7 11 12
8 12 13
9 13 14
10 14 6
11 6 2
12 7 2
13 3 7
MEMBER PROPERTIES
3 11 PRIS YD 0.2 ZD 1.0
4 to 10 PRIS YD 0.2 ZD 1.0
1 13 PRIS YD 0.15 ZD 1.0
2 12 PRIS YD 0.15 ZD 1.0
CONSTANTS
E CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
LOAD 1 DEAD LOADS
MEMBER LOADS
3 TO 11 UNI GY -0.500
3 CONC GY -0.000 0.075
11 CONC GY -0.000 0.000
1 13 CONC GY -0.375
MEMBER LOADS
1 TRAP GX 0 0.558
2 TRAP GX 0.558 0.614
13 TRAP GX 0 -0.558
12 TRAP GX -0.558 -0.614
1 TO 2 UNI GX 0.670
12 TO 13 UNI GX -0.670
1 1.0 2 1.0
PERFORM ANALYSIS
FINISH
2 ANALYSIS RESULTS

Sl. No.
3 DESIGN OF DRAIN
Design constants
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
0.80 m x 1.000 m
Shear check
Max. SF = 1.48 t
= #NAME?
#NAME?

= 0.23 t-m
Ast = 63.57 mm²
b) DESIGN OF WALLS



Shear check
Max. SF = 1.34 t
= #NAME?
#NAME?

= 0.16 t-m
Ast = 58.91 mm²
ARG Technocrats
Design of Drain Section1M X 1.2M For maximum length

return Period


c) 0.50
vegetative cover
page-1

on either side


c) 5.00
A= L x b= 300*(6+4+5+55)
/10000=2.1Ha

06 0.68 Pav= ∑wn.cn/∑wn
Pav

water shed in hours
ARG Technocrats

09 Drain size considerd 1m x 1.2 m bxd
10 Wetted perimeter 'P' 3.40 full condition =1 + 2*1.2=3.4m
11 Area of cros-section 'A' 1.20 full condition =1*1.2=1.2 SQm
2/3
13 R 0.50
0.5
15 S 0.07

17 0.04

Ic 
F=10cm, T=.5 hr, t= tc+tf = 0.07 hr
19 0.75 Q=0.028PAIc
cumsec
cumsec.
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
1.00 m x 1.200 m
1.325 m
1.20 m 1.450 m
0.18 m 0.175 m
1.350 m
0.588 m 0.588 m
1.175 m

1 LOAD CALCULATION
1) Dead load
Wall
Base slab
UDL of Base Slab = 0.25 x 2.5 = 0.625
Load = 0.84 t/m
0.088 m 0.088 m
1.175 m 1.325 m
0.53 t 0.53 t
0.000 t 0.000 t
0.63 t/m
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
1.00 m x 1.200 m
2) Earth Pressure

SBC = 10 t/m2
sin2 (   ) cos 1
Ka  x
sin2  sin( -  )  sin(   ) sin( -  ) 
2
1  
 sin( -  ) sin(   ) 

settlement = 40 mm
2
0.000
0.887 t
0.66 m 1.325 m
0.74m
0.56 m
0.739 t/m 0.67 t/m 0.67 t/m 0.74 t/m

DL+SIDL
UNITS MTONS METERS
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 1.175 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 1.325 0.00
3 1.175 1.325 0.00
5 0.088 0.00 0.00
6 1.088 0.00 0.00
7 1.175 0.125 0.00
8 0.00 0.125 0.00
9 0.230 0.00 0.00
10 0.373 0.00 0.00
11 0.516 0.00 0.00
12 0.659 0.00 0.00
13 0.802 0.00 0.00
14 0.945 0.00 0.00
MEMBER INCIDENCES
148
281
315
459
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
1.00 m x 1.200 m
5 9 10
6 10 11
7 11 12
8 12 13
9 13 14
10 14 6
11 6 2
12 7 2
13 3 7
MEMBER PROPERTIES
3 11 PRIS YD 0.25 ZD 1.0
4 to 10 PRIS YD 0.25 ZD 1.0
1 13 PRIS YD 0.175 ZD 1.0
2 12 PRIS YD 0.175 ZD 1.0
CONSTANTS
E CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
LOAD 1 DEAD LOADS
MEMBER LOADS
3 TO 11 UNI GY -0.625
3 CONC GY -0.000 0.088
11 CONC GY -0.000 0.000
1 13 CONC GY -0.525
MEMBER LOADS
1 TRAP GX 0 0.670
2 TRAP GX 0.670 0.739
13 TRAP GX 0 -0.67
12 TRAP GX -0.67 -0.739
1 TO 2 UNI GX 0.670
12 TO 13 UNI GX -0.670
1 1.0 2 1.0
PERFORM ANALYSIS
FINISH
2 ANALYSIS RESULTS

Sl. No.
3 DESIGN OF DRAIN
Design constants
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN OF DRAIN
1.00 m x 1.200 m
Shear check
Max. SF = 2.13 t
= #NAME?
#NAME?

= 0.33 t-m
Ast = 69.39 mm²
b) DESIGN OF WALLS



Shear check
Max. SF = 1.72 t
= #NAME?
#NAME?

= 0.24 t-m
Ast = 69.47 mm²
ARG Technocrats
DESIGN
NAME OF WORK :- Rcc structure for Box Culvet 4.0m x 3.0 m
DESIGN DATA :
1 WIDTH OF EACH BARREL 4.00 m

2 HEIGHT OF EACH BARREL 3.00 m
3 NUMBER OF BARRELS 1 Nos.
4 LIVE LOAD 4.50 t/m2
5 DEAD LOAD 1.20 t/m2
6 UNIT WEIGHT OF DRY EARTH 1.80 t/m3
7 UNIT WEIGHT OF SATURATED EARTH 2.00 t/m3
8 UNIT WEIGHT OF SUBMERGED EARTH 1.00 t/m3
9 UNIT WEIGHT OF CONCRETE 2.50 t/m3
10 ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION ( φ ) 30 Degree
11 GRADE OF STEEL Fe 415
12 GRADE OF CONCRETE M 20
13 BANK LEVEL 101.50 m
14 DRAIN H.F.L. 100.00 m
15 LEVEL AT TOP OF BARREL 100.00 m
16 NOMINAL COVER 50 mm
(1) Critical section of the barrel
The barrel shall be subjected to maximum loading under the bank at the lowest possible
level of the barrel as indicated below in the following section:-
Bank level 101.50 m

Saturation line 100.00 m
R.L. = 100.00 m
t = 0.30 m
3.00
R.L. = 96.70 m
R.L. = 96.40 m
4.0
(2) Design features
Following cosiderations have been made in the design of barrels :

(i) Bottom slab : This design is for uplift pressure and reaction from soil resulting from
the loading on the foundations. Theoretically, the soil reaction is not uniform but for
simplification it is assumed uniform.
(ii) side walls : Side walls would be tested in the following two critical conditions
(a) High flood in the drain while barrels are empty
(b) No water in the drain while barrels are full
(iii) Partition walls : The partition walls are subjected to equal pressures on either side, and
therefore,no reinforcement is required. Nominal reinforcement is, however,
provided to take care of contingency arising due to unequal pressures
resulting from chocking up of any of the barrels.
(iv) Top slab : The loads considered for design of top slab are :
(a) Earth load,
(b) Weight of water below saturation line
As there is no roadway along the drain, no live load due to traffic shall be considered.
(3) Design
As the barrels are rigidly joined, they should be designed as a continuous structure. Hardy Cross
method of moment distribution shall be used for design.
Thickness of top / bottom slab 0.4 m
Thickness of side wall 0.4 m
The effective length of horizontal member = 4.30 m
The effective length of vertical member = 3.30 m
Distribution factors
At joint A
3.3
For member AB = = 0.43
3.3 + 4.3
4.3
For member AD = = 0.57
3.3 + 4.3
At joint D
4.3
For member DA = = 0.57
3.3 + 4.3
3.3
For member DC = = 0.43
3.3 + 4.3
(i) Loads
Consider one meter length of barrel
Depth of dry earth over barrel = 101.50 - 100.00 = 1.50 m
Depth of saturated earth = 100.00 - 100.00 = 0.00 m
Weight of dry and saturard earth = 1.50 X 1.80 + 0.00 X 2.00
= 2.7 t/m2
Weight of top slab = 0.30 X 2.50 = 0.75 t/m2
Live load and dead load = 4.50 + 1.20 = 5.70 t/m2
Weight on the top slab including its own weight = 2.7 + 0.75 + 5.70
= 9.15 t/m2
Weight of the barrels per metre of length
=( 1 X 4.30 + 2 X 3.30 )x 0.30 X 2.50
= 8.18 t
Total dead load/m length of barrels = = 8.18 + 2.70 X 4.30 + 5.70 x
= 44.30 t
Net upward pressure on the base slab = = 44.30 / 4.30 = 10.30 t/m2
10.30 t/m 2
(ii) Earth pressure

The earth pressure shall comprise of the following :
(a) dry earth pressure above saturation line from R.L. 100.00 to 101.50
(b) saturated earth pressure from R.L. 100.00 to 100.00
Corresponding to φ = 30 degree , Cp = 1/3
The pressure at A= Surcharge ( due to dry earth + Satured soil + live & dead load )
= Cp X wd X h1 + Cp X ws X h2
+ Cp x WDL,LL
= 1/3 X 1.80 X 1.50 + 1/3 X 1.0 X 0.00
+ 1/3 X 5.70
= 2.80 t/m2
Pressure at D = 2.80 + Cp X ws X h1 + Cp x wd X
= 2.80 + 1/3 X 1.00 X 0.00 + 1/3 x 1.80 X
= 4.78 t/m2
Loads acting on different members are shown below :
2
9.15 t/m
2 2
2.80 t/m 2.80 t/m
A B E
4.30 4.30
3.30
D C F
2
4.78 1.98 t/m
2
t/m 2 10.30 t/m
(iii) Fixing moments

wl2 X 4.3 9.152
(i) On span AB = = 12 12
= 14.10 t-m
wl 2
10.30 X 4.3 2
(ii) On span CD = 12 = 12
= 15.88 t-m
(iii) On span AD fixed end moments in the wall at each end due to rectangular portion
wl2 2.80 X 3.3 2
= 12 = 12
= 2.55 t-m
Fixed end moments due to triangular portion
1.98 X 3.3 2
MAD = 30
= 0.72 t-m
MDA = 1.98 X 3.3 2
20
= 1.08 t-m
Total fixed end moments at A = 2.55 + 0.72
= 3.27 t-m
Total fixed end moments at D = 2.55 + 1.08
= 3.63 t-m
(iv) Distribution of moments
Joints C D A B
Member Dc DA AD AB
Distribution factore 0.43 0.57 0.57 0.43
Fixed end -15.88 15.88 -3.63 3.27 -14.10 14.10
moments
Balance -5.32 -6.93 6.13 4.70
Carry over -2.66 3.06 -3.47 2.35
Balance -1.33 -1.73 1.96 1.50
Carry over -0.67 0.98 -0.87 0.75
Balance -0.43 -0.55 0.49 0.38
Carry over -0.21 0.25 -0.28 0.19
Balance -0.11 -0.14 0.16 0.12
Total -19.42 8.70 -8.70 7.40 -7.40 17.39
(v) Net moments at centre and face

Span AB
9.15 X 4.3 9.15 X 0.15
2
Sagging moments at face = ------------------- X 0.15 - -----------------------------

2 2
= 2.848 t-m
4.15
Fixing moments at face= 7.40 + ( 17.39 - 7.40 )
4.3
= 17.04 t-m
Net fixing moments at face = 17.04 - 2.848
= 14.2 t-m
Sagging moments at centre = 9.15 X 4.3
2
8
= 21.15 t-m
Fixing moments at centre = 7.40 + 17.39
2
= 12.39 t-m
Net sagging moments at centre = 21.148 - 12.394
= 8.754 t-m
Span CD
10.30 X 4.3 10.30 X 0.15
2
Sagging moments at face = -------------------- X 0.15 - ----------------------------

2 2
= 3.206 t-m
Fixing moments at face= 4.15
8.70 + ( 19.42 - 8.70 )
4.3
= 19.04 t-m
= 15.84 t-m
Sagging moments at centre = 10.30 X 4.3
2
8
= 23.81 t-m
Fixing moments at centre = 19.42 + 8.70
2
= 14.06 t-m
= 9.75 t-m
Span AD
(a) Due to rectangular portion
2.80 X 3.3 2.80 X 0.15
2
= X 0.15 -
2 2
= 0.662 t-m
(a) Due to triangular portion

1.98
X 3.3 1 0.1 X 0.15
= X X 0.15 - X 0.05
2 3 2
= 0.16 t-m
Total sagging moments at face = 0.662 + 0.163
= 0.82 t-m
3.15
Fixing moments at face = 7.40 + X( 8.70 - 7.40 )
3.3
= 8.64 t-m
= 7.81 t-m
Sagging moments at centre
2.80 X 3.30
2
(a) Due to rectangular portion =
8
= 3.81 t-m
1.98 X 3.30 1
(b) Due to triangular portion = X 3.3 X
2 7.81
= 1.38 t-m
Total sagging moments at centre = 3.81 + 1.38
= 5.19 t-m
8.70 + 7.40
Fixing moments at centre =
2
= 8.05 t-m
= -2.86 t-m
The net moments at face and centre of the different spans are tabulated below :
MOMENTS
Span
At face At centre
AB 14.20 t-m (hogging) 8.75 t-m (sagging)
CD 15.84 t-m (hogging) 9.75 t-m (sagging)
AD 7.81 t-m (hogging) -2.86 t-m (sagging)
(vi) Thickness of members

The maximum moment in the barrels is 15.84 t-m
For M 20 grade concrete and steel of Fe 415
70 Kg/cm 1500 Kg/cm2
2
σcbc = σst = water side
m = 13 σst = 1900 Kg/cm3 out side
k = 0.378
j = 0.874 R = 11.552
The minimum effective thickness (d) required for bending moment

d =

M
bQ
=
15.84
100
X
X
105
12
= 37.03 cm
Adopt overall thickness of all the members = 40 cm
Then effective thickness = 35 cm
(clear cover = 5.0 cm )
The reinforcement required at various points is given below :
(vii) Reinforcement
Span AB (Top Horizontal Slab)
Moments in t-m Reinforcement required
At face 14.20 t-m (hogging) At = 30.93 Cm

2
Provide 20 mm bars @ 10.0 cm c/c

At centre 8.75 t-m (sagging) At = 19.08 Cm
2

Distribution Provide 10 mm bars @ 17.0 cm c/c
Span CD (Bottom Horizontal Slab)
At face 15.84 t-m (hogging) At = 34.51 Cm

2

At centre 9.75 t-m (sagging) At = 21.25 Cm
2

Span AD (vertical wall)
At face 7.81 t-m (hogging) At = 17.03 Cm2

At centre -2.86 t-m (sagging) At = 6.22 Cm2
Hench 200 mm Provide 10 mm bars @ 17.0 cm c/c
corner Provide 10 mm bars @ 17.0 cm c/c
Nominal steel shall also be provided on the outer face of the walls for the condition when there is
no water in the drain and barrels are running full. The details of reinforcement are shown below
A 20 mm φ @ 16 cm c/c
C.C. M - 20 20 mm φ @ 25
18 cm c/c
DETAILS OF REINFORCEMENT IN BARREL

20 mm φ @10.0 cm c/c
10 mm φ @ 17.0 cm c/c
20 mm φ @ 16 cm c/c
20 mm φ @ 14 cm c/c
10 mm bars @
20 mm φ @ 18 cm c/c 17 cm c/c
10 mm bars @ 17 cm c/c
3.00
20 mm φ @ 14 cm c/c
20 mm φ @ 9 cm c/c 10 mm bars @
17 cm c/c
0.30 4.00 0.30

4.30
h2
3.30
Cm2
cm c/c
Cm2
cm c/c
cm c/c
Cm2
cm c/c
Cm2
cm c/c
cm c/c
Cm2
cm c/c
Cm2
cm c/c
cm c/c
cm c/c
cm c/c
Calculation of Discharge at WTP Plant and Rising Main Sizing
for 2MLD within 12 Hrs of Working
Require qty of Water per day 2000 kl within 16 hrs

Discharge expected at Pumpstation (2000 x 1000)/16hrs l/hr
= 125000 L/Hr
= 125 cum/hr
Size of Dia of Rising Main = 200 mm

Length of pipe 12.2 km
Maximum Velocity at Discharge Point 1.1 m/s
Head loss due to friction at above velocity 68 m

0.63 0.54 2
Hazen-Williams Equation: V = k C (D/4) S where S = hf / L and Q = V π D / 4
C for DI pipe 140
k 0.85 (for m and seconds)
Required Rated Discharge by 200 mmdia pipe 125 cum/hr
Required Velocity 3980.892 m/hr
1.105803 m/s
hence Discharge capacity of selected dia is ok
Total Head required at discharge 5m
head loss due to frictional loss 68 m
Topographical Head 39 m
Desired head of Pump 117.6 m
say 120 m
Pump Required for above discharge shall be of 70 HP (See attached Pump Sizing)
Pumping Plant at RAW Water Sump
Motor Size Calculation for VT Pump-Raw Water
Design Flow,mld 2
Pumping Hours 16
Flow in m3/hr 125
No of working pump 2
No.of stand bye pump 1
Discharge of Pump (M3/Hr) 78
Or M3/s 0.022
1 Or LPS 22
2 Rated head (M) 120
Water horse power 26
(Based on 1 & 2) (kw)
Pump efficiency at rated head and discharge.
Pump efficiency (%) 80%
BHP at pump impeller shaft. (kw) 32
Motor efficiency at rated condition. % 80%
Input to motor (kw) 40
Reserve Power 15%
Required Motor 45.9
Motor Provided 52
or 69.70509
HP 70
Calculation of Discharge From WTP Plant to OHT
for 750 KL within 6 Hrs of Working, Size of Pump
Require qty of Water per day 750 kl within 6 hrs

Discharge expected at Pumpstation (750 x 1000)/6hrs l/hr
= 125000 L/Hr
= 125 cum/hr
Size of Dia of Rising Main = 200 mm

Length of pipe 200 m
Maximum Velocity at Discharge Point 1.1 m/s
Head loss due to friction at above velocity 1.12 m

0.63 0.54 2
Hazen-Williams Equation: V = k C (D/4) S where S = hf / L and Q = V π D / 4
C for DI pipe 140
k 0.85 (for m and seconds)
Required Rated Discharge by 200 mmdia pipe 125 cum/hr
Required Velocity 3980.892 m/hr
1.105803 m/s
hence Discharge capacity of selected dia is ok
Total Head required at discharge 5m
head loss due to frictional loss 1.12 m
Topographical Head 21 m
Desired head of Pump 28.476 m
say 30 m
Pump Required for above discharge shall be of 31 HP (See attached Pump Sizing)
Pumping Plant at Clear Water Sump at WTP
Motor Size Calculation for VT Pump-Raw Water
Design Flow,KL 750

Pumping Hours 6
Flow in m3/hr 125
No of working pump 1
No.of stand bye pump 1
Discharge of Pump (M3/Hr) 156
Or M3/s 0.043
1 Or LPS 43
2 Rated head (M) 30
Water horse power 13
(Based on 1 & 2) (kw)
Pump efficiency at rated head and discharge.
Pump efficiency (%) 80%
BHP at pump impeller shaft. (kw) 16
Motor efficiency at rated condition. % 80%
Input to motor (kw) 20
Reserve Power 15%
Required Motor 22.9
Motor Provided 23
or 30.8311
HP 31
Distribution Supply line- Hydraulic Design of
Crtical Section from Nodes,
21-16-15-12-13-36-37-39-40-41-42-43-44-45-46-47-48-51
Joint Hazell William Coef c= 140
Velocity Total Topogra
Length Req. Discharge Dia of Availaible Head Residual
From To (m/s), Head phical
(m) (l/min) at Pipe Discharge at Loss Head
(A) (B) min Loss Head
(A) (mm) (A) (L/s) (m/100m) (m)
0.5m/s (m) Loss
51 47 299 3.13 100 0.5 3.93 0.30 0.90 -1.00 11.65
47 46 27.23 68.75 100 0.5 3.93 0.30 0.08 10.73
46 45 222.69 90.63 100 0.5 3.93 0.30 0.67 -1.00 11.40
45 44 200.23 109.38 100 0.5 3.93 0.30 0.60 13.00
44 40 201.46 156.25 150 0.5 8.83 0.19 0.38 -2.00 13.38
40 37 322.18 206.25 150 0.5 8.83 0.19 0.61 16.00
37 36* 15.74 231.25 150 0.5 8.83 0.19 0.03 16.03
36* 13 132.21 256.25 150 0.5 8.83 0.19 0.25 16.28
13 12 236.5 296.88 150 0.5 8.83 0.19 0.45 16.73
12 15 15.65 440.63 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.02 2.00 16.75
15 16 114.5 478.13 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.15 14.89
16 21 47.7 956.25 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.06 14.96
21 OHT 33.24 986.25 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.04 15
Distribution Supply line- Hydraulic Design of

Crtical Section from Nodes,
21-16-15-12-10-09-08-07-05-04-02
Joint Hazell William Coef c= 140
Velocity Total Topogra
Length Req. Discharge Dia of Availaible Head Residual
From To (m/s), Head phical
(m) (l/min) at Pipe Discharge at Loss Head
(A) (B) min Loss Head
(A) (mm) (A) (L/s) (m/100m) (m)
0.5m/s (m) Loss
2 4 113.11 27.78 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.15 -1.00 13.12
4 5 158.86 111.11 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.21 14.33
5 7 161.59 125.00 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.21 -1.00 14.54
7 8 328.68 144.44 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.43 15.96
8 9 9.24 163.89 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.01 15.98
9 10 222.88 183.33 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.29 16.27
10 11 185.24 194.44 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.24 16.51
11 12 168.74 213.89 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.22 2.00 16.73
12 16 130.15 671.18 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.17 14.89
16 21 47.7 729.51 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.06 14.96
21 OHT 33.24 1459.03 200 0.5 15.70 0.13 0.04 15

Detailed Project Report Development of Industrial Area,: at Piparsewa, Dist - Morena

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Detailed Project Report Development of Industrial Area,: at Piparsewa, Dist - Morena

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Detailed Project Report on Development of External and internal Services ARG Tech.

Industrial Area, Piparsewa, Morena

Detailed Project Report

INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Detailed Project Report

INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Effective modulus of subgrade reaction of foundation,

Rear Tandem Axles Rear Tridem Axles

Total Bottom-up Fatigue Damage due to single and

Design for Bonded Pavement Option

Effective modulus of subgrade reaction of foundation,

Rear Tandem Axles Rear Tridem Axles

Total Bottom-up Fatigue Damage due to single and

Design for Bonded Pavement Option

Sl.No. Data Type Value Reference

100mm per hour for 25 year

02 Value of Co-efficient of Run-off PI:

a) for bituminous/paved surface 0.90

As per Table-2 of IRC: SP-42, page-

impervious claey soils with

03 Width of Catchment Area (W)

(3.50m CW + 2.5m shoulder + 0.0m

(1.0m earthen shoulder + 3.0 m

unpaved claey surface with (15m half the ROW- 3.5m-2.50m-1)

d) Built up Area 55.00 100m on either side

04 Length of Catchment Area 'L' 300.00 from ch- to ch-

Average co-efficient of Run-off

07 Mannings co-efficient 'n' 0.02 for concrete lined drain

Time of entry of flow to drains

L= distance of critical point to

09 Drain size considerd 0.6m x 0.8 m bxd

10 Wetted perimeter 'P' 2.20 full condition =0.6 + 2*0.8=2.2m

11 Area of cros-section 'A' 0.48 full condition =0.6*0.8=0.48 SQm

12 Hydraulic Radius 'R' 0.22 R= A/P

14 Slope of the drain 'S' 0.005

16 Mean Velocity of flow m/sec 1.59 v= 1/n x S0.5 x R2/3

Time of concentration for =length of the drain section/ velocity

Max. Intensity of rainfall 'Ic' in F T  1

21 Maximum Allowable velocity 6.00 As per IRC: SP-42

Self weight of Earth = 2.00t/m3

Density of Soil = 2.0 t/m3

Earth pressure Coefficient = 0.279 (IRC 6-2010 Cl. 217.1 )

0.502 t/m 0.67 t/m 0.67 t/m 0.50 t/m

Description Base Slab Walls

a) DESIGN OF BASE SLAB

Distribution reinforcement = .2 DL Moment

Total moment on wall due to Moment-tm Shear-t Max Moment-tm

Net maximum moment on walls = 0.51 t-m

Provide TOR 12 dia @ 150 mm c/c 754 mm² Percent = 0.60 %

Distribution reinforcement = .2 DL Moment

c) DESIGN OF TOP SLAB

Thickness of Top Slab = 0 mm

Provide TOR 12 dia @ 125 mm c/c 904 mm² Percent = -2.58 %

Distribution reinforcement = .2 DL Moment

Sl.No. Data Type Value Reference

100mm per hour for 25 year

02 Value of Co-efficient of Run-off PI:

a) for bituminous/paved surface 0.90

As per Table-2 of IRC: SP-42, page-

impervious claey soils with

03 Width of Catchment Area (W)

(3.50m CW + 2.5m shoulder + 0.0m

(1.0m earthen shoulder + 3.0 m