Example Structure Report PDF

1.
2 SCOPE OF WORK
This report describes the methodology description, design criteria, and important result from several analyses
which are carried out in order to ensure the integrity of structure. Analysis which are carried out consist of:
• In-place analysis for operating and storm condition

• Seismic analysis for SLE and DLE condition.
• Fatigue Spectral analysis.
1.3 ABBREVIATIONS
API : American Petroleum Institute

AISC : American Institute of Steel Construction
ASTM : American Society for Testing and Material
AWS : American Welding Society
COG : Center of Gravity
EL : Elevation
FT : Feet (measurement unit)
HAT : Highest Astronomical Tide
HHWL : Highest High Water
ID : Identification
IN : Inch (measurement unit)
LAT : Lowest Astronomical Tide
LCASE : Load Case(s)
LCOMB : Load Combination(s)
LLWL : Lowest Low Water Level
LOADCN : Load Condition
MSL : Mean Sea Level
OD : Outer Diameter
SF : Safety Factor
TOS : Top of Steel
UC : Unity check
WSD : Working Stress Design
WD : Water depth
2 PLATFORM DESRIPTION
2.1 PLATFORM LOCATION
The PHE-2A-6 platform is located in West Madura offshore. Coordinates of the PHE-2A-6 platform are as
followed [ref. 8]:
Latitude : 6°51’ 09.76” South
Longitude : 112°57’ 17.43” East
2.2 WATER DEPTH
The reference datum in structural model is Mean Low Water Level (MLWL). Refer to PHE WMO Metocean Data
Integration [Ref. 8], water depth of PHE 2A-6 Platform with datum in MSL is 55.25 m (181.27 ft.)
2.3 PLATFORM CONFIGURATION
PHE-2A-6 platform configuration is described as below:
Table 2-1 Platform Configuration and Appurtenances Summary
Description Remark
Water Depth (datum at MLW) 63 ft.
Boat landing 1 (one)
No. of Leg (Piles) 3 (three)
Conductors 1 (one)
Risers 1 (one)
Jacket Elevation El.(+)12'-0"
El (-) 22'-0"
El.(-) 63’-0"
EL.(+) 35’-0” – TOS of Main Deck
Deck Elevation
EL.(+) 28’-0” – TOS of Well Access Deck
The platform is completed with a pair of boat landings, and a crane. Illustration of PHE 2A-6 platform is shown
in following figure.
Figure 2-1 PHE 2A-6 Platform model elevation
2.4 PLATFORM ORIENTATION
“Platform North” of PHE-2A-6 shall be defined as the northern direction of the major axis of the structure. The
difference in angle between “Platform North” and “True North” for each platform () for PHE-2A-6 is 66
clockwise as described in the following figure
Figure 2-2 PHE 2A-6 Platform model orientation Methodology.

3 DESIGN PARAMETER
3.1 UNIT OF MEASUREMENT
According to Ref [8], all structural calculation, dimensions and weights shall be in Imperial unit (lbs., in, ft., etc.).
3.2 CONTINGENCY FACTOR
The following weight contingency shall be used to cover any weight or load variation or inaccuracy in design
engineering.
Table 3-1 Contingency Factor (Design Basis)

Description Contingency (%)
Structural Dead Load 5
Equipment Load 5
Piping Load 5
Live Load 5
3.3 SPLASH ZONE
Refer to [Ref 5], splash zone defines as part of the platform, which is intermittently exposed to the air and
immersed in the sea. Unless specify otherwise on the project specification, the splash zone to be considered
for structural design shall extend between:
• The upper limit of the splash zone ( SZ u ) = SZU = U1 + U 2 + U 3

• The lower limit of the splash zone ( SZ L ) = SZ L = L1 − 10 ft. (or 3 m)
Where
U1 = wave crest calculated from 100 years maximum wave height
U2
= HAT level
U 3 = Upper storm surge
L1
= LAT level
For PHE 2 Satellite Platforms, splash zone area has been defined between (-) 10’- 8” and (+) 15’-4” with
reference level at MSL.
3.4 MATERIAL PROPERTIES
The mechanical steel properties which considered in the analyses are as followed:
• Young modulus E = 29,000 ksi,

• Shear modulus G = 11,600 ksi
• Poisson ratio ν = 0.3
• Volumetric mass ρ = 490 lb/ft³
All structural steel being used in this project shall be based on the following specification and corresponding
yields strengths:
Table 3-2 Structural Steel Specification
Nominal Yield
Item Application Acceptable Material Spec Type Class.
Strength Ksi (MPa)
Plates • Stiffeners,
• Deck Plate, ASTM A36 36 (248) Type III
• Walls
• Stiffeners,
• Flange Plate,
• ASTM A572 Gr.50, with SR91
• Web Plate, 50 (345) Type I
• API 2H Gr.50 with S1, S3
• Boxed Plate,
• Cap Beam
Rolled • Walkways,
section • Stair, ASTM A36 36 (248) Type III
• Pipe support
Tubular • Stairs, • API 5L Gr. B
Section 35 (240) Type III
• Pipe supports • ASTM A106 Gr. B
Joint Cans Topsides joint cans • ASTM A36 36 (248)
Type IV
• API 5L Gr. B 35 (240)
• Topsides joint
• ASTM A572 Gr.50, with SR 91. 50 (345)
cans Type II
• API 2H Gr.50 with S1, S3, S4, S5
• Jacket joint cans
Tubular Bracing • ASTM A36
36 (248) Type III
• API 5L Gr. B
Jackets
Tubular Bracing • ASTM A572 Gr. 50 with SR 91 50(345)
Type I
• API 2H Gr.50 with S1,S3
Piles Pile Section • ASTM A36
36(248) Type III
• API 5L Gr. B
3.5 ALLOWABLE STRESSES
The Working Stress Design methodology will be used for design. The following table summarized the allowable
stresses to be considered for each analysis according to ref. [4] and Ref [5]:
Table 3-3 Working Stress Design
Analysis Condition Required Allowable Stress

In-place 1-year operating Basic AISC-API
In-place 100-years extreme Basic AISC-API + 33.3% increase
Seismic (Strength Level Earthquake) Basic AISC-API + 33.3% increase
Seismic (Ductility Level Earthquake) Basic AISC-API + 70% increase
3.6 ALLOWABLE DISPLACEMENT
Allowable for relative horizontal displacement as per Company Specification [ref. 4] shall be limited to H/200.
Generally, vertical deflection shall not exceed following values:
Table 3-4 Vertical Displacement Allowable

Element Limit
Floor beam (depth < 400 mm (16”) L/200
Floor beam (depth > 400 mm (16”) L/360
Cantilever beam L/100
Equipment support L/500
3.7 PILE PENETRATION SAFETY FACTOR
The minimum safety factor for piles shall be described below:
Table 3-5 Safety Factors
Load Condition Safety Factors

In-Place operating 2.00
In-Place Storm 1.50
Seismic SLE 1.20
Seismic DLE 1.00
3.8 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
Environmental data is adapted from the report Metocean Data Integration Study for WMO Field, November
2013 by PT. Bina Rekacipta Utama [ref. 8].
3.8.1 Water Level
The following water refer to [Ref. 8] is considered in analyses which are carried out.
Table 3-6 Platform Water Level
Water Depth *)
Description In-place
Seismic and Fatigue
Operating (ft.) Storm (ft.)
Mean Sea Level 55.28 55.28

Highest High Water Level (HHWL) 3.77 5.45
Lowest Low Water Level (LLWL) -2.36 -0.69
55.28
Storm Surge (SS) 1.13 2.79
Max. Water depth (MSL + HHWL + SS) 60.18 63.52
Min. Water depth (MSL + LLWL - SS) 51.79 51.8
*) Reference water level is MSL
3.8.2 Wind Speed
Wind speed in following table is used for the structural analyses. In the analysis, 1 minute wind will be used for
the design wind loads.
Table 3-7 Environmental Wind Speed

Return Period
Wind
1-yr 100-yr
1-hour wind 38.38 ft/s 11.70 m/s 57.81 ft/s 17.62 m/s
1-min wind 42.22 ft/s 12.87 m/s 63.58 ft/s 19.38 m/s
3-sec gust 49.90 ft/s 15.21 m/s 75.16 ft/s 22.91 m/s
3.8.3 Wave and Current
Wave and current loads were generated in 16 directions for in-place analysis. Those 16 directions consist of 0,
22.5, 45, 67.5, 90, 112.5, 135, 157.5, 180, 202.5, 225, 247.5, 270, 292.5, 315 and 337.5. The
wave and current loads for operating and storm condition for each direction were generated by SACS in single
load case. The wave loads were generated for both minimum and maximum water depth cases. Wave theory
for all structural calculations is using Stokes order 5th for both 1 year-operating and 100 years-storm waves.
Following tables present design wave and current data for PHE 2A-6 platform.
Table 3-8 Wave Data

Return Period
Wave Parameter 1-yr Return Period 100-yr Return Period
(In-place Operating) (In-place Storm)
Hmax (ft) 9.91 ft 3.02 m 22.24 ft 6.78 m
Period (s) 5.61 sec 9.19 sec
Table 3-9 Current Data
1-yr Return Period 100-yrs Return Period

Current
Ft/s m/s Ft/s m/s
Current El. 0% (Surface) 1.46 44.61 2.70 82.45
Current El. 10% 1.44 43.94 2.66 81.22
Current El. 20% 1.42 43.21 2.62 79.86
Current El. 30% 1.39 42.39 2.57 78.35
Current El. 40% 1.36 41.47 2.51 76.65
Current El. 50% 1.32 40.40 2.45 74.68
Current El. 60% 1.28 39.14 2.37 72.33
Current El. 70% 1.23 37.56 2.28 69.42
Current El. 80% 1.16 35.45 2.15 65.51
Current El. 90% 1.05 32.11 1.95 59.34
Current El. 100% (Bottom) 1.00 30.72 1.86 56.78
3.8.4 Marine Growth
All structural members, conductors, risers and other appurtenances should be increased in cross-sectional area
to account for marine growth thickness. Element with circular cross sections should be classified as either
“smooth” or “rough” depending on the amount of marine growth expected to have accumulated on the at the
time of the loading event. The specific marine growth profile shall be taken from underwater inspection results.
The density of marine growth which considered is 87.4 lb/ft³. In case underwater inspection results are not
available, the 2-inch marine growth thickness shall be considered in the structural assessment analyses from
MHWL down to mudline elevation
3.8.5 Hydrodynamic Parameter
The drag coefficient (CD) and inertia coefficient (CM) values are applied in accordance with API RP 2A-WSD,
unless overridden to account for un-modeled items such as anodes and grating on jacket walkway.
Table 3-10 Hydrodynamic Parameter
In-Place & Seismic Fatigue
Analysis Type
CD (drag) CM (inertia) CD (drag) CM (inertia)
Rough Surfaces 1.05 1.20 0.70 2.00
Smooth Surfaces 0.65 1.60 0.70 2.00
For member attached with anode, the drag and inertia coefficient will be adjusted with sound engineering
method so the effect of anode presentation on members could be represented properly.
3.8.6 Current Blockage Factor
The current speed in the vicinity of the platform is reduced from the specified “free stream”. Based on API [ref.
1] Sect. 2.3.1.b, the factor to reduce the current “free stream” is shown on Table below:
Table 3-11 Current blockage factor.

Number of Legs Heading Factor
3 All 0.90
3.8.7 Wave Kinematics Factor
The API [ref. 1] allows the usage of Wave Kinematics Factor in the range of 0.85 – 0.95 for tropical storms,
applied to the horizontal velocities and accelerations from two – dimensional regular wave. A wave kinematic
factor of 1.00 is used for fatigue analysis, as shown in following table.
Table 3-12 Wave kinematic factor.

Analysis Condition Wave Kinematic Factor
In-place operating 1.00
In-place storm 0.95
Fatigue 1.00
3.8.8 Dynamic Amplification Factor
Dynamic amplification factors (DAF) were found using formula:
1
DAF =
2 2
 T 2n   T n 
1 − 2  +  2 Q 
 Tw   Tw 
where: Tn = Structural natural period (sec)
Tw = Wave period (sec)
Q = Damping factor = 2%
3.9 CORROSION ALLOWANCE
A corrosion allowance was also applied to all members in the splash zone of the jacket, including jacket legs,
deck legs, and piles above jacket, primary jacket braces and caisson. The required allowance during in-place
is 1/4 inch (6 mm) of the member thickness in splash zone. For other major appurtenance i.e. boat landing,
barge bumper, and riser guard in the splash zone shall also designed with corrosion allowance 1/8 inch (3 mm).
For fatigue analysis, the corrosion allowance requirement is 1/8 inch (3 mm) [Ref. 5]
3.10 SOIL DATA
The pile soil structure interaction analysis is carried out using PSI module of SACS. As this is a non-linear
analysis, PSI operates on combined load cases rather than basic load cases. In case of original soil data for
PHE-2 satellite platform is not available; soil data for KE30-2 [Ref.10] may be used in convenience due to its
adjacent location. Pile penetrations are modeled as per shown in following table.
Table 3-13 Pile Penetration Depth

Pile Head Penetration Depth
Pile Head Joint
OD (in) Thickness (in) (ft)
Row 1-Slant Penetration 36 1.5 296.36
3.11 SEISMIC DATA
PGA’s derived from Seismic Hazard Study at West Madura Offshore Java, Indonesia Report by Human Power
and Promisco [Ref.9]. Since PHE-2 Satellite Platforms are located at Near Onshore area, recommended design
spectra for PHE-2 Satellite Platforms is shown in Table 3-14. 5% critical damping ratio with 40 (forty) considered
modes in modal analysis will be considered in the analyses.
Table 3-14 Recommended Design Spectra for Seismic SLE and DLE
Recommended Design Spectra
SLE DLE
T (sec) SA (g) T (sec) SA (g)
0.01 0.11 0.01 0.16
0.14 0.27 0.17 0.40
0.68 0.27 0.83 0.40
0.70 0.26 0.85 0.39
1.10 0.16 1.20 0.28
2.40 0.08 2.40 0.14
4.00 0.05 4.00 0.08
6.00 0.03 6.00 0.06
8.00 0.02 8.00 0.04
10.00 0.02 10.00 0.03
3.12 FATIGUE DATA
Deterministic fatigue shall be performed in the jacket, if required by code/standard spectral fatigue shall be also
performed. The spectral fatigue analysis shall be applied if the natural period of structure is more than 3.0
seconds [Ref. 1].
3.12.1 Number of Wave
The fatigue wave heights and waves periods are independent parameters. Even though, wave height can be
measured and collected in the increased range, which also applied to the increased period range. These data
are presented in wave scatter diagram. The wave scatter diagram is presented the probability value in significant
wave height (Hs) corresponds to Zero Crossing Period (Tz). The wave scatter diagrams are taken from
Metocean Data Integration Study for WMO Field by PT Bina Rekacipta Utama, November 2013 [Ref. 8], for
Cluster B, which is PHE 2A-6 is located. Based on the metocean document, the wave loads for fatigue analysis
are determined by 16 directions of waves. The following tables present waves scatter based on Metocean Study
[Ref. 8] which are used in the fatigue analysis.
Table 3-15 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to North

Significant Joint Probability of Hs and Tz
N
Wave Height, Period, Tz (second)
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 - 0.6667 - 0.333 - - - 1.0000
0.5 – 1.0 - - - - - - - -
1.0 – 1.5 - - - - - - - -
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total - 0.6667 - 0.3333 - - - 1.0000
Table 3-16 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to North North East

NNE
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 - 0.4500 0.5500 - - - - 1.0000
0.5 – 1.0 - - - - - - - -
1.0 – 1.5 - - - - - - - -
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total - 0.4500 0.5500 - - - - 1.0000
Table 3-17 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to North East
NE
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 - 0.7297 0.1892 - - - - 0.9189
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.0811 - - - - 0.0811
1.0 – 1.5 - - - - - - - -
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total - 0.7297 0.2703 - - - - 1.0000
Table 3-18 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to East North East

ENE
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 0.0189 0.5094 0.3019 0.0566 - - - 0.8868
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.1132 - - - - 0.1132
1.0 – 1.5 - - - - - - - -
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total 0.0189 0.5094 0.4151 0.0566 - - - 1.0000
Table 3-19 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to East

E
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 0.0279 0.3464 0.3017 0.1061 0.0168 0.0056 - 0.8045
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.1341 0.0559 0.0056 - - 0.1956
1.0 – 1.5 - - - - - - - -
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total 0.0279 0.3464 0.4358 0.162 0.0224 0.0056 - 1.0001
Table 3-20 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to East South East
ESE
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 0.0035 0.0468 0.1364 0.2272 0.0354 0.0001 - 0.4494
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.0098 0.2151 0.0802 0.0029 - 0.3080
1.0 – 1.5 - - 0.0001 0.0337 0.1006 0.0603 - 0.1947
1.5 – 2.0 - - - 0.0003 0.0079 0.0370 0.0026 0.0478
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - 0.0001 - 0.0001
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total 0.0035 0.0468 0.1463 0.4763 0.2241 0.1004 0.0026 1.0000
Table 3-21 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to South East

SE
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 0.0001 0.0038 0.0432 0.2614 0.0411 0.0002 - 0.3498
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.0013 0.2438 0.1798 0.0182 - 0.4431
1.0 – 1.5 - - - 0.0105 0.0981 0.0501 0.0013 0.1600
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - 0.0061 0.0296 0.0028 0.0385
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - >0.0000 0.0039 0.0031 0.0070
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - 0.0015 0.0015
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - 0.0001 0.0001
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total 0.0001 0.0038 0.0445 0.5157 0.3251 0.1020 0.0088 1.0000
Table 3-22 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to South South East

SSE
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 >0.0000 0.0219 0.2078 0.5659 0.0058 - - 0.8014
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.0062 0.1553 0.0318 0.0003 - 0.1936
1.0 – 1.5 - - - 0.0011 0.0033 0.0004 - 0.0048
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - 0.0002 - 0.0002
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total >0.0000 0.0219 0.2140 0.7223 0.0409 0.0009 - 1.0000
Table 3-23 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to South
S
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 - 0.0560 0.5303 0.1867 0.0010 - - 0.7740
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.0661 0.1448 0.0015 - - 0.2124
1.0 – 1.5 - - - 0.0086 0.0045 0.0005 - 0.0136
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total - 0.0560 0.5964 0.3401 0.0070 0.0005 - 1.0000
Table 3-24 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to South South West

SSW
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 - 0.0424 0.5313 0.1654 - - - 0.7391
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.0874 0.1520 0.0047 - - 0.2441
1.0 – 1.5 - - - 0.0161 0.0007 - - 0.0168
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total - 0.0424 0.6187 0.3335 0.0054 - - 1.0000
Table 3-25 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to South West

SW
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 - 0.0496 0.5104 0.2044 0.0083 0.0015 - 0.7742
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.0577 0.1504 0.0123 - - 0.2204
1.0 – 1.5 - - - 0.0039 0.0015 - - 0.0054
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total - 0.0496 0.5681 0.3587 0.0221 0.0015 - 1.0000
Table 3-26 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to West South West
WSW
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 0.0004 0.0605 0.3099 0.0515 0.0268 0.0003 - 0.4494
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.1269 0.2684 0.0958 0.0034 - 0.4946
1.0 – 1.5 - - >0.0000 0.0461 0.0071 0.0020 - 0.0552
1.5 – 2.0 - - - 0.0001 0.0001 0.0005 - 0.0007
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total 0.0004 0.0605 0.4368 0.3661 0.1299 0.0062 - 1.0000
Table 3-27 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to West

W
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 0.0008 0.0370 0.4648 0.0207 0.0067 >0.0000 - 0.5300
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.2656 0.1829 0.0203 >0.0000 - 0.4688
1.0 – 1.5 - - >0.0000 0.0012 - - - 0.0012
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total 0.0008 0.0370 0.7304 0.2048 0.0270 >0.0000 - 1.0000
Table 3-28 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to West North West

WNW
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 0.0068 0.0700 0.6224 0.1975 0.0257 - - 0.9224
0.5 – 1.0 - - 0.0617 0.0065 0.0092 - - 0.0774
1.0 – 1.5 - - 0.0003 - - - - 0.0003
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total 0.0068 0.0700 0.6844 0.2040 0.0348 - - 1.0000
Table 3-29 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to North West
NW
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 0.0189 0.5283 0.3019 0.0755 0.0755 - - 1.0000
0.5 – 1.0 - - - - - - - -
1.0 – 1.5 - - - - - - - -
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total 0.0189 0.5283 0.3019 0.0755 0.0755 - - 1.0000
Table 3-30 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to NNW

NNW
HX (m) Total
0.0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-6.0 6.0-7.0
0.0 – 0.5 - 1.0000 - - - - - 1.0000
0.5 – 1.0 - - - - - - - -
1.0 – 1.5 - - - - - - - -
1.5 – 2.0 - - - - - - - -
2.0 – 2.5 - - - - - - - -
2.5 – 3.0 - - - - - - - -
3.0 – 3.5 - - - - - - - -
3.5 – 4.0 - - - - - - - -
4.0 – 4.5 - - - - - - - -
4.5 – 5.0 - - - - - - - -
Total - 1.0000 - - - - - 1.0000
Sixteen fatigue wave attack direction in every 22.5 degree is considered in current fatigue analysis. Fatigue
wave attack directions which are considered in current fatigue analysis is shown in Figure 4-3.
Figure 3-1 Fatigue wave attack direction for PHE 2A-6
3.12.2 Stress Concentration Factors
Stress concentration factors (SCFs) for simple joints shall be determined using Efthymiou equation. SCF will
automatically calculated by computer software. A minimum SCF of 2.5 shall be used for simple TKY joints,
while minimum SCF of 2.0 used for inline joint.
3.12.3 S-N Curve
For S-N curves, the API X’ curve shall be used in the calculation fatigue life at TKY connections in accordance
with API RP2A WSD and/or API RP2A LRFD, as applicable.
The API X curve may be used in the calculation of greater fatigue lives of TKY connection in which the
appropriate weld profile control is specified in accordance with API RP2A WSD and/or API RP2A LRFD, as
applicable. Alternative methods of improving fatigue life, such as adding ring stiffeners or grouting an internal
sleeve shall not be used, unless specially approved in writing by the COMPANY.
3.12.4 Fatigue Safety Factor
The in-service fatigue design life of the platform shall be at least two times the service life of the platform.
4 ANALYSIS AND COMPUTER MODEL
4.1 COMPUTER PROGRAM
The analysis of the platform shall be carried out using SACS version 5.7. The analysis is performed using 3D
structures analysis computer models, which use stiffness method to determine the characteristics of the
structure. All primary framing members shall be include in the computer analysis models as well as secondary
steel carrying significant loads.
4.2 GLOBAL COORDINATE
The global axis coordinate system is set as follows:
• X-axis is towards platform East

• Y-axis is towards platform North
• Z is positive upwards
• The origin of the coordinate system is located at chart datum and in the middle caisson.
4.3 IN-PLACE ANALYSIS
The structural analysis for PHE-2A-6 Platform deck has been performed using SACS (Structural Analysis
Computer System) program modules. The frame configuration, material properties, applied load, load
combination, environmental data and data related to the structure will be compiled as structural data.
Combination between loads also described on this data. All brace members are checked at member ends at
the face of the adjoining chord member. Offsets are modeled for the tubular brace on the main truss lines to
obtain the correct stiffness. Soil properties, pile penetration depth and pile below mudline properties will be
composed as soil data. Later on, both data will be used as input for linear static analysis. This analysis will be
determine the interaction between structure and soil during the platform operation and storm condition. The
analysis and code check of structures is primary based on the guidelines provided in API-RP2A [ref. 1]. A one
– third increase in the allowable stresses was applied in accordance with API RP 2A-WSD for the 100-years
extreme. For Operating no increase allowable stresses are considered. The flowchart of in-place analysis is
shown below.
Figure 4-1 In-place Analysis Flow Chart
4.4 SEISMIC ANALYSIS
The seismic analyses are performed utilizing the DYNAMIC RESPONSE program module of the SACS suite of
programs. The dynamic response of the structure due to base motions is computed from the PGA utilizing the
normalized design spectra. Fluid damping is automatically calculated by the program using equivalent linear
damping that dissipates the same energy as the actual non-linear damping in a cycle. Additionally a uniform
modal-damping ratio of 5% of critical is used. The resulting modal responses are combined by the Complete
Quadratic Combination (CQC) method. The three orthogonal response factors (X=1, Y=1 and Z=0.5) are
applied in accordance with API RP 2A.
The results of the dynamic response analysis are then combined with the results of a static analysis in order to
obtain the total loads in the structure. The two cases analyzed maximize the compressive and tensile loads in
the structure.
The piles below mud-line are modeled as “super element”. Upon completion of the above analysis the lateral
force from static step and base shear from earthquake step are used to perform super element analysis to check
convergence. A 5% difference is considered acceptable on convergence.
The natural frequency of structure is calculated using the SACS DYNPAC program. The input for this program
is a modified common input file used for static analysis, which contains one load case that comprises gravity
load and deck loads.
4.5 FATIGUE ANALYSIS
Deterministic fatigue shall be performed in the jacket, if required by code/standard spectral fatigue shall be also
performed. The spectral fatigue analysis shall be applied if the natural period of structure is more than 3.0
4.6 MODEL
The model will be constructed from 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) beam elements and will include all primary
members and secondary members carrying significant loads. The stress level induced into the structure shall
be checked against the allowable stresses specified in the nominated codes of practice.
Topside of PHE 2A-6 platform is supported with 4 deck leg integrated with main beam. It has 4 level decks, as
described below:
• Main deck : El. (+) 54’-6”
• Mezzanine deck : El. (+) 42’-6”
4.7 MEMBER EFFECTIVE LENGTH
The following effective length factors (as per API RP 2A section 3.3.1.d) were used:
Table 4-1 Effective Length Factor

Effective Length
Situation Note
Factor (K)
Superstructure Legs
Braced 1.0
Portal (unbraced) K(2)
Jacket Legs and Piling

Grouted Composite Section 1.0 (1) Defined in Section 3.3.1e
Un-grouted Jacket Legs 1.0 (2) Use Effective Length Alignment Chart in
Un-grouted Piling Between Shim Points 1.0 Commentary of AISC. This may be
modified to account for conditions
Deck Truss Web Members different from those assumed in
In-Plane Action 0.8 developing the chart.
Out-of-plane Action 1.0 (3) At least one pair of members framing into
a joint must be in tension if the joint is not
Jacket Braces braced out of plane.
Face-to-face length of Main Diagonals (4) Whichever is more applicable to a
0.8 specific situation.
Face of leg Centerline of Joint Length
0.8
of K Braces (3)
Longer Segment Length of

X Braces (3) 0.9
Secondary Horizontals 0.7
Deck Truss Chord Members 1.0
5 ANALYSIS RESULTS
5.1 PLATFORM LOADING

5.1.1 Structural Dead Load
The generated dead loads include all modeled structural steel (jacket and deck primary steel, piles, etc.) with buoyancy loads included as part of automatic load
generation. The weight of all equipment, piping, electrical, instrument etc. are defined as equipment load. Operating equipment and piping weight are used for platform
assessment. The structural self-weight and buoyancy are summarized on Table 5-1,
Table 5-1 Structural Dead Weight

No. Description Load (kips)
1 Generated Structural Load 521.74
2 Buoyancy Load Operating Condition - Max. WD 339.02
3 Buoyancy Load Operating Condition - Min. WD -305.02
4 Buoyancy Load Storm Condition - Max. WD -358.04
5 Buoyancy Load Storm Condition - Min. WD -305.06
6 Equipment Load 6.075
Structural Dead Load Operating Condition - Max WD (1+2+6) 188.795
Structural Dead Load Operating Condition - Min WD (1+3+6) 832.835
Structural Dead Load Storm Condition - Max WD (1+4+6) 885.855
Structural Dead Load Storm Condition - Min WD (1+5+6) 832.875
5.1.2 Basic Load Case
The weight of all equipment, piping, electrical, instrument etc. are defined as equipment load. Operating equipment and piping weight are used for platform assessment.
The appurtenance load includes handrail, grating, and anodes that are installed on the platform legs. The weights of equipment, live load, and applied on the model are
listed on Table 5-2
Table 5-2 Basic Load Case Summary
No. LOADCN LOADID Load Description Location Basic Load (kips) Cont. Factor Factored Load (kips)
Deck Appurtenance
1 GRAT 1¼" x 3/16" Main Deck Grating Main Deck 11.120 1.05 11.676
DAPP
2 HDRL Main Deck Handrail Main Deck 1.945 1.05 2.042
Jacket Appurtenance
3 JAPP AND Anode Jacket Leg 21.189 1.05 22.248
Total Appurtenance Load 34.254 35.967
Existing Equipment
4 CP Control Panel Main Deck 0.441 1.05 0.463
5 ESD ESD Panel Main Deck 0.441 1.05 0.463
6 EQP GASDRYER Gas Dryer Main Deck 0.221 1.05 0.232
7 GASRCV Gas Receiver Main Deck 4.200 1.05 4.410
8 GASSCRUB Gas Scrubber Main Deck 0.772 1.05 0.810
XMAS XMASSTREE X-mas Tree Access Platform 10.000 1.05 10.500
9 CRDL CRANE-DL Existing Crane Dead Load Main Deck 19.010 1.05 19.961
Total Equipment Load 35.085 36.839
Live Load
10 LLMAINDK Live Load at Main Deck Main Deck 104.94 1.05 110.187
11 LIVE LLJW Live Load at Jacket Walkway Jacket Walkway 48.02 1.05 50.421
12 LLWELL Live Load at Access Platform Access Platform 20.25 1.05 21.263
Total Live Load 173.21 181.8705
5.1.3 Environmental Load
Environmental loads generated based on design parameter mentioned on section 4 on this report. Following
tables shown summary of environment tal load resulted during in-place analysis.
Table 5-3 Environmental Load during In-Place Operating Condition

Load (kips)
Load Case Description
Fx Fy Fz
OM01 Wave & Current at 000.0 Deg - Max WD 44.050 0.370 -0.070
OM05 Wave & Current at 090.0 Deg - Max WD -0.390 44.500 -1.030
OM09 Wave & Current at 180.0 Deg - Max WD -45.250 0.710 0.660
OM10 Wave & Current at 202.5 Deg - Max WD -41.480 -16.560 1.080
OM13 Wave & Current at 270.0 Deg - Max WD 0.370 -45.130 1.370
ON01 Wave & Current at 000.0 Deg - Min WD 43.650 0.210 -0.670
ON05 Wave & Current at 090.0 Deg - Min WD -0.940 46.640 -1.250
ON10 Wave & Current at 202.5 Deg - Min WD -43.120 -16.560 -0.820
ON13 Wave & Current at 270.0 Deg - Min WD 0.670 -45.670 -0.070
ON14 Wave & Current at 292.5 Deg - Min WD 17.930 -42.560 0.790
ON15 Wave & Current at 315.0 Deg - Min WD 32.780 -32.160 0.820
ON16 Wave & Current at 337.5 Deg - Min WD 40.710 -16.240 -0.570
Table 5-4 Environmental Load during In-Place Storm Condition
Load (kips)
Load Case Description
Fx Fy Fz
SM01 Wave & Current at 000.0 Deg - Max WD 193.530 -4.320 -2.300
SM02 Wave & Current at 022.5 Deg - Max WD 176.820 73.110 -2.480
SM05 Wave & Current at 090.0 Deg - Max WD -4.190 201.840 -7.610
SM10 Wave & Current at 202.5 Deg - Max WD -177.520 -71.730 -0.530
SM11 Wave & Current at 225.0 Deg - Max WD -133.830 -135.810 0.780
SM12 Wave & Current at 247.5 Deg - Max WD -69.250 -182.290 1.530
SM13 Wave & Current at 270.0 Deg - Max WD 3.760 -201.440 3.630
SM15 Wave & Current at 315.0 Deg - Max WD 143.400 -144.070 0.530
SN01 Wave & Current at 000.0 Deg - Min WD 248.350 -5.340 -5.970
SN02 Wave & Current at 022.5 Deg - Min WD 206.950 85.730 -1.200
SN05 Wave & Current at 090.0 Deg - Min WD -4.990 272.820 -8.820
SN09 Wave & Current at 180.0 Deg - Min WD -251.450 7.140 1.610
SN10 Wave & Current at 202.5 Deg - Min WD -228.940 -92.410 1.560
SN11 Wave & Current at 225.0 Deg - Min WD -172.880 -175.190 -2.220
SN12 Wave & Current at 247.5 Deg - Min WD -89.470 -234.420 -0.640
SN13 Wave & Current at 270.0 Deg - Min WD 4.310 -259.540 3.230
SN14 Wave & Current at 292.5 Deg - Min WD 101.090 -241.620 3.240
5.2 STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTIC
Structural dynamic characteristic consists of structural natural period and mass participation factor for each
considered mode shapes in strength and ductility level earthquake analysis. Following tables shows the
summary.
Table 5-5 Natural Period
Freq. Gen. Period
Mode Eigenvalue
(cps) Mass (sec)
SLE Condition
1 0.773991 1.28E+03 4.23E-02 1.2920043
2 0.907208 1.33E+03 3.08E-02 1.1022835
3 1.594471 1.39E+03 9.96E-03 0.6271672
4 2.543284 1.51E+03 3.92E-03 0.3931924
5 2.589371 3.53E+02 3.78E-03 0.3861942
6 2.593304 4.16E+02 3.77E-03 0.3856084
7 2.698143 8.29E+02 3.48E-03 0.3706253
8 3.607826 5.16E+02 1.95E-03 0.2771752
9 3.689167 1.73E+03 1.86E-03 0.2710639
10 4.556772 9.91E+02 1.22E-03 0.2194536
DLE Condition
1 0.728236 1.38E+03 4.78E-02 1.3731809
2 0.864138 1.45E+03 3.39E-02 1.1572219
3 1.507385 1.51E+03 1.11E-02 0.6634005
4 2.416824 1.12E+03 4.34E-03 0.4137662
5 2.456681 3.66E+02 4.20E-03 0.4070532
6 2.469656 4.93E+02 4.15E-03 0.4049147
7 2.571068 9.30E+02 3.83E-03 0.3889434
8 3.500739 1.88E+03 2.07E-03 0.285654
9 3.564538 4.50E+02 1.99E-03 0.2805413
10 4.474848 8.98E+02 1.26E-03 0.2234713
Table 5-6 Mass Participation

Mass Participation Factor Cumulative Factors
Mode
X Y Z X Y Z
SLE Condition
1 0.109787 6.74E-01 2.28E-03 0.109787 0.673848 0.002284
2 0.691495 1.09E-01 1.39E-04 0.801282 0.783203 0.002422
3 0.000883 3.52E-04 1.03E-04 0.802165 0.783555 0.002526
4 0.015345 3.06E-02 2.29E-04 0.817509 0.814159 0.002754
5 0.026974 1.07E-03 5.04E-05 0.844483 0.815232 0.002804
6 0.031131 1.12E-01 1.40E-06 0.875613 0.927118 0.002806
7 0.098405 4.99E-02 9.18E-04 0.974018 0.977013 0.003723
8 0.011207 2.96E-03 9.48E-02 0.985226 0.979975 0.098523
9 2.86E-03 5.02E-04 8.08E-01 0.988084 0.980478 0.906716
10 4.96E-03 1.57E-02 2.10E-03 0.993046 0.996161 0.908813
11 4.58E-03 0.00145 0.000667 0.997628 0.997611 0.909481
12 0.000148 1.91E-05 0.000032 0.997776 0.99763 0.909513
13 0 0 0.088944 0.997776 0.99763 0.998456
14 0.000924 0.000786 7.8E-06 0.9987 0.998416 0.998464
15 0.000414 0.000514 1.57E-05 0.999114 0.99893 0.99848
16 3.3E-06 0.000127 2.24E-05 0.999117 0.999057 0.998502
Mode
X Y Z X Y Z
17 0.000266 0.000198 2.23E-05 0.999383 0.999255 0.998525
18 4.99E-05 0.000227 6.42E-05 0.999433 0.999481 0.998589
19 8.9E-06 1.52E-04 0.000026 0.999442 0.999633 0.998615
20 0.000167 0 0.000095 0.999609 0.999633 0.99871
21 4.14E-05 4.6E-06 0.000298 0.99965 0.999638 0.999007
22 1.2E-06 1.2E-06 1.63E-05 0.999651 0.999639 0.999024
23 3.40E-06 0.000029 1.29E-05 0.999655 0.999668 0.999037
24 3.78E-05 1.79E-04 3.01E-05 0.999693 0.999847 0.999067
25 0.000152 6.6E-06 7.39E-05 0.999844 0.999854 0.999141
26 7.47E-05 4.99E-05 4.77E-05 0.999919 0.999904 0.999188
27 4.73E-05 9E-07 2.93E-05 0.999966 0.999905 0.999218
28 1.44E-05 1.33E-05 4.44E-05 0.999981 0.999918 0.999262
29 0.000001 4.06E-05 2.41E-05 0.999982 0.999959 0.999286
30 6.3E-06 5.70E-06 1.53E-05 0.999988 0.999964 0.999301
31 4.6E-06 7.5E-06 0.000104 0.999993 0.999972 0.999405
32 1.3E-06 1.34E-05 1.3E-06 0.999994 0.999985 0.999406
33 4E-07 7.9E-06 4.38E-05 0.999994 0.999993 0.99945
34 6E-07 6E-07 6.1E-06 0.999995 0.999994 0.999456
35 2.8E-06 8E-07 2.32E-05 0.999998 0.999994 0.999479
36 3E-07 0.000004 0.00027 0.999998 0.999998 0.99975
37 6E-07 0 1.37E-05 0.999999 0.999999 0.999763
38 0.00E+00 4E-07 2.07E-05 0.999999 0.999999 0.999784
39 0.00E+00 0 2.56E-05 0.999999 0.999999 0.99981
40 0.00E+00 5.00E-07 1.40E-04 0.999999 0.999999 0.99995
DLE Condition
1 0.146867 6.52E-01 1.69E-03 0.146867 0.651661 0.001687
2 0.669512 1.48E-01 7.62E-05 0.816378 0.799528 0.001763
3 0.000649 2.97E-04 9.25E-05 0.817027 0.799825 0.001855
4 0.009075 1.83E-02 5.26E-04 0.826102 0.818149 0.002382
5 0.016661 3.09E-03 3.27E-05 0.842763 0.821236 0.002414
6 0.040701 1.16E-01 3.23E-05 0.883464 0.936915 0.002447
7 0.098034 4.60E-02 3.50E-04 0.981498 0.982914 0.002797
8 5.72E-05 1.71E-03 8.55E-01 0.981555 0.984625 0.857513
9 9.68E-03 6.66E-04 5.15E-02 0.991232 0.985291 0.909044
10 3.70E-03 1.18E-02 5.08E-04 0.994927 0.997131 0.909551
11 0.003223 0.001013 0.000278 0.99815 0.998144 0.909829
12 0.000118 2.56E-05 2.18E-05 0.998268 0.99817 0.909851
13 0 0 0.088956 0.998268 0.99817 0.998807
14 0.000704 0.000601 9E-07 0.998973 0.99877 0.998807
15 0.000313 0.000377 1.39E-05 0.999286 0.999147 0.998821
16 1.70E-06 0.000102 1.98E-05 0.999287 0.999249 0.998841
17 0.000236 0.000135 1.24E-05 0.999523 0.999384 0.998854
18 2.52E-05 0.000203 1.23E-05 0.999549 0.999587 0.998866
19 7.8E-06 0.000111 1.08E-05 0.999556 0.999698 0.998877
20 0.000129 1.00E-07 5.76E-05 0.999685 0.999698 0.998934
21 2.61E-05 3.1E-06 0.000266 0.999711 0.999701 0.9992
22 0.000001 1.3E-06 8.90E-06 0.999712 0.999703 0.999209
Mode
X Y Z X Y Z
23 3.20E-06 2.45E-05 8.00E-06 0.999716 0.999727 0.999217
24 3.15E-05 0.000146 2.08E-05 0.999747 0.999873 0.999238
25 0.000125 5.6E-06 0.000059 0.999872 0.999879 0.999297
26 6.12E-05 4.29E-05 3.90E-05 0.999933 0.999922 0.999336
27 0.000043 1.2E-06 2.26E-05 0.999976 0.999923 0.999358
28 8.8E-06 1.25E-05 4.31E-05 0.999985 0.999935 0.999401
29 6E-07 3.19E-05 1.53E-05 0.999985 0.999967 0.999417
30 4.6E-06 4.90E-06 1.82E-05 0.99999 0.999972 0.999435
31 4.4E-06 5.4E-06 7.92E-05 0.999994 0.999978 0.999514
32 1.1E-06 1.04E-05 8E-07 0.999995 0.999988 0.999515
33 4E-07 6.5E-06 3.72E-05 0.999996 0.999994 0.999552
34 4E-07 6E-07 0.000006 0.999996 0.999995 0.999558
35 2.2E-06 5E-07 1.62E-05 0.999998 0.999996 0.999574
36 2E-07 3.30E-06 0.000222 0.999999 0.999999 0.999796
37 4E-07 0 0.000017 0.999999 0.999999 0.999813
38 0.00E+00 3.00E-07 1.67E-05 0.999999 0.999999 0.99983
39 0.00E+00 0 2.04E-05 0.999999 0.999999 0.99985
40 0.00E+00 4.00E-07 1.05E-04 0.999999 1 0.999955
5.3 EARTHQUAKE BASE SHEAR
Base shear of the structure for the seismic condition was generated in two orthogonal axis directions as follows
Table 5-7 Base Shear

Earthquake Base Shear
Super-element (kips) % Different
Seismic (kips)
Analysis X- Y-
X-Direction Y-Direction X-Dir. Y-Dir.
Direction Direction
SLE 154 139 153.992 138.99 0.01% 0.01%
DLE 277 248 278 247.9 0.36% 0.04%
5.4 MEMBER STRESS CHECK
The In-place analysis was done at minimum and maximum water depth both for 1-year operating and 100-year
storm condition. There are several members which is not satisfying API RP2A and AISC ASD requirements in
both in-place and seismic condition. The summary of member stress check for each structural section is shown
in following tables.
Table 5-8 Member Stress Check for In-place Operating

Location Member Properties UC LComb
Member No. Group
Main Deck 5018-5019 MD6 L303004 0.55 1013
Access Platform 0354-0375 CG4 8.625" Ø x 0.322" WT 0.27 1010
Deck Leg & Diagonal Brace 0111-5004 DDB 8.625" Ø x 0.322" WT 0.24 1013
Riser & Conductor Guard 4058-0354 CG3 8.625" Ø x 0.322" WT 0.4 2004
4041-4020 JW4 2.375" Ø x 0.154" WT 1.09 2013
Jacket Horizontal Frame (El. (-) 22'-0")
4003-4034 JW1 12.500" Ø x 0.250" WT 1.02 2003
Jacket Horizontal Frame (El. (-) 22'-0") 2002-0018 HB1 12.750" Ø x 0.375" WT 0.45 2014
Jacket Mudmat 1004-1005 MM1 C10X25 0.15 1012
Jacket Brace 4002-2001 DB3 16.000" Ø x 0.375" WT 0.17 2005
Jacket Leg 0258-0145 L03 40.000" Ø x 1.000" WT 0.22 2006
Pile Above Mudline P008-P012 P02 36.000" Ø x 1.500" WT 0.09 2004
Table 5-9 Member Stress Check for In-place Storm

Member
Location Properties UC LComb
Member No. Group
Main Deck 5018-5019 MD6 L303004 0.35 1013
Riser & Conductor Guard 0158-0157 RG2 12.500" Ø x 0.250" WT 0.33 2005
Jacket Walkway 4003-4034 JW1 12.500" Ø x 0.250" WT 0.73 2003
Jacket Horizontal Frame (El. (-) 22'-0") 0018-0026 RSS 6.000" Ø x 0.500" WT 0.72 2016
Jacket Brace J102-2001 DB1 20.000" Ø x 0.500" WT 0.38 2007
Jacket Leg 0147-0149 L05 39.500" Ø x 0.750" WT 0.61 2007
Table 5-10 Member stress check for seismic (SLE)

Member
Member No. Group
Main Deck 5018-5019 MD6 L303004 0.78 2
Riser & Conductor Guard 4203-4002 CGR 12.500" Ø x 0.250" WT 0.26 1
Jacket Leg 0258-0145 L03 40.000" Ø x 1.000" WT 0.41 2
Table 5-11 Member stress check for seismic (DLE)
Member
Member No. Group
Main Deck 5004-0053 SB2 C10X15 1.41 2
Riser & Conductor Guard 4203-4002 CGR 12.500" Ø x 0.250" WT 0.31 1
Jacket Leg 0258-0145 L03 40.000" Ø x 1.000" WT 0.53 2
5.5 JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR CHECK
Joint punching shear stresses has been check in order to follow the API RP2A requirement during analysis.
During in-place operating, there are 26 joints have UC greater than 1, while during in-place storm, there are 32
joints with UC greater than 1. For seismic SLE analysis, 7 joint has UC more than 1.0, while for DLE analysis,
there are 4 joints. The maximum joints shear checks are shown the following table.
Table 5-12 Joint punching shear check

Joint
Load Condition Load UC Location
No.
4022 3.815 Jacket Walkway
In-place
Operating
In-place Storm 4009 203.503 Jacket Walkway
Seismic SLE 4023 1.484 Access Platform
4034 1.416 Access Platform
Seismic DLE 4023 1.347 Jacket Walkway
5.6 PILE AXIAL BEARING CAPACITY
Summary of analysis result for pile minimum safety factors are shown in following table.
Table 5-13 Pile Safety Factor for In-place Condition
In-Place Operating In-Place Storm

Parameter
Pile 010 Pile 011 Pile 012 Pile 010 Pile 011 Pile 012
Soil Capacity (kips) 757.2 757.2 757.2 757.2 757.2 757.2
Max. Load (kips) 218.1 172.5 214.2 455.9 449.4 455.5
Soil Safety Factor 3.47 4.39 3.54 1.66 1.68 1.66
Table 5-14 Pile Safety Factor for Seismic Condition

Seismic SLE Seismic DLE
Parameter
Pile 010 Pile 011 Pile 012 Pile 010 Pile 011 Pile 012
Soil Capacity (kips) 774.9 774.9 774.9 774.9 774.9 774.9
Max. Load (kips) 358.4 312.9 343.9 540.2 485.9 524.5
Soil Safety Factor 2.16 2.48 2.25 1.43 1.59 1.48
Note
1) Required minimum safety factor for in-place operating is 2.0 whereas 1.50 for in-place storm as per API RP-2A WSD.
2) Required minimum safety factor for seismic SLE 1.20 & DLE is 1.0 as per company specification.
5.7 DISPLACEMENT
5.1.1 Vertical Displacement
Horizontal displacement on platform’s main deck is shown in table below. The results indicated that all vertical
displacements on main deck have fulfilled the allowable criteria.
Table 5-15 Vertical Displacement

Allowable
Ref. Span Length Relative Vertical
Condition Corr. Joint Displ. (L/100)
Joint (ft) Displacement (in)
(in)*
Operating Cantilever Beam 5068 5003 9 1.08 0.097
Storm Cantilever Beam 5068 5003 9 1.08 0.3699
SLE Cantilever Beam 5068 5003 9 1.08 0.2973
DLE Cantilever Beam 5068 5003 9 1.08 0.4994
5.1.2 Horizontal Displacement
Horizontal displacement on platform’s main deck is shown in table below. The results indicated that all horizontal
displacements on main deck have fulfilled the allowable criteria.
Table 5-16 Horizontal Displacement

Allowable
Ref. Height, H Relative Lateral
Condition Corr. Joint Displ.
Joint Displacement (in)
(in) (H/200) (in)
Operating 5076 5077 14.000 0.070 0.012
Storm 5068 5003 14.000 0.070 0.017
SLE 5059 5002 14.000 0.070 0.009
DLE 5075 5004 10.000 0.050 0.010
5.1.3 Pile Head Displacement
Pile head displacement should satisfy bellow:
∆Disp. ≤ OD/10 as boundary of maximum displacement,
Pile head displacement result shown in Table 5-17 below.
Table 5-17 Pile Head Displacement

Allowable Displacement
No Load Condition Joint Load Displacement (inch) Remark
(OD/10)
1 In-place operating P010 2005 0.99 3.6 OK
2 In-place storm P011 2010 1.95 3.6 OK
3 Seismic SLE P010 - 1.40 3.6 OK
4 Seismic DLE P010 - 2.06 3.6 OK
5.2 FATIGUE LIFE
The platform has been in operation for 16 (sixteen) years. According to API RP2A requirements, joint fatigue
life of this structure shall be more than (SF1xSL1) + (SF2xSL2) = (16x1) + (4x2) = 24 years. Table below shown
the minimum joint service life resulted from analysis for main joints that do not fulfill the fatigue life criterion.
Table 5-18 Joints with Minimum Service Life

Member Fatigue Results
Joint
ID Group Type Svc Life Location
0018 2002-0018 HB1 TUB 8.216 Jacket Brace
1002 0005-1002 MM5 TUB 9.253 Mudmat
1003 1003-0009 MM5 TUB 9.9135 Mudmat
6 FAILED MEMBER INVESTIGATION AND RECOMMENDATION
As reported in above section, there are several members with joint UC exceed the tolerance limit occurred in
in-place and seismic condition. Those members are mostly located in jacket walkway elevation. Recalculation
by considering the plate’s thickness shall be performed in the next revision.

Example Structure Report PDF

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Example Structure Report PDF

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

1.

• In-place analysis for operating and storm condition

API : American Petroleum Institute

2.1 PLATFORM LOCATION

Latitude : 6°51’ 09.76” South

Longitude : 112°57’ 17.43” East

2.2 WATER DEPTH

2.3 PLATFORM CONFIGURATION

PHE-2A-6 platform configuration is described as below:

Table 2-1 Platform Configuration and Appurtenances Summary

2.4 PLATFORM ORIENTATION

Figure 2-2 PHE 2A-6 Platform model orientation Methodology.

3.1 UNIT OF MEASUREMENT

3.2 CONTINGENCY FACTOR

Table 3-1 Contingency Factor (Design Basis)

3.3 SPLASH ZONE

• The upper limit of the splash zone ( SZ u ) = SZU = U1 + U 2 + U 3

U 3 = Upper storm surge

3.4 MATERIAL PROPERTIES

• Young modulus E = 29,000 ksi,

3.5 ALLOWABLE STRESSES

Table 3-3 Working Stress Design

Analysis Condition Required Allowable Stress

3.6 ALLOWABLE DISPLACEMENT

Table 3-4 Vertical Displacement Allowable

3.7 PILE PENETRATION SAFETY FACTOR

The minimum safety factor for piles shall be described below:

Table 3-5 Safety Factors

Load Condition Safety Factors

3.8 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA

3.8.1 Water Level

Table 3-6 Platform Water Level

Mean Sea Level 55.28 55.28

3.8.2 Wind Speed

Table 3-7 Environmental Wind Speed

3.8.3 Wave and Current

Table 3-8 Wave Data

Table 3-9 Current Data

1-yr Return Period 100-yrs Return Period

3.8.4 Marine Growth

3.8.5 Hydrodynamic Parameter

3.8.6 Current Blockage Factor

Table 3-11 Current blockage factor.

3.8.7 Wave Kinematics Factor

Table 3-12 Wave kinematic factor.

3.8.8 Dynamic Amplification Factor

Dynamic amplification factors (DAF) were found using formula:

3.10 SOIL DATA

Table 3-13 Pile Penetration Depth

3.11 SEISMIC DATA

3.12.1 Number of Wave

Table 3-15 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to North

Table 3-16 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to North North East

Table 3-18 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to East North East

Table 3-19 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to East

Significant Joint Probability of Hs and Tz

Table 3-21 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to South East

Table 3-22 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to South South East

Significant Joint Probability of Hs and Tz

Table 3-24 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to South South West

Table 3-25 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to South West

Table 3-27 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to West

Table 3-28 Wave Joint Probability of Hz vs Tz Directional to West North West