Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Henry Laurence Gantt was an American engineer and famous management consultant. He was best known for his
planning methodology, the Gantt Chart.
He was one of the followers of Frederick Taylor, but when he became an industrial Engineer, he began to
reconsider Taylor's incentive policies. He mainly focused on control system for production scheduling. He modified
the “Differential Rate System” as having too little motivational impact. He came up with new ideas-
A. Workers who met daily requirement should be given 50% bonus.
B. Supervisors should be given bonus for each worker that reached daily standard.
C. Plus extra bonus if everyone reached it.
With these he believed it would motivate supervisors to train their workers to do better jobs.
Every workersprogress was rated publicly and recorded in individual bar charts. Black when the worker
meets with the standard & red when he fell short. With this he originated a charting system in the year 1910 for
production scheduling known as gantt chart.
He also emphasized on the recognition of human factors & the social responsibility of business. He believed
profitable organizations have responsibility towards the welfare of society.
“The business system must accept its social responsibility & devote itself primarily to service, or the community
will ultimately make the attempt to take it over in order to operate in its own interest.”
-Henry L. Gantt
Gantt Task System: Under Gantt Task System, the standard time is fixed for the completion of a task based
on a careful time and motion study. The worker’s actual performance is compared against thestandard time to
determine his efficiency and make the payments accordingly.
The Gantt task system guarantees the worker’s time-rate for the level of output below thestandard. Thus, if the
worker takes more than the standard time to complete the task, then hisefficiency is below 100%, and he is paid
only the time wages.If the worker completes the task within the standard time, then his efficiency is 100% and
inaddition to the time wages, he is also paid a bonus of 20% on the wages earned. If the workertakes less than the
standard time to complete a task, then his efficiency is more than 100%, andthe wages are paid at high-piece rates.
The Gantt task system can be illustrated by the following example:
Regular Rateper Hour = Rs40.00
High piece-rate= Rs60.00
Standard Output= 10 units
Time Taken = 10hrs
Case-1 Case-2 Case-3
Output 7 units 10units 12 units
Rate Applicable Rs 40.00 Rs 40.00 Rs 60.00
Reason As the output is less than As the output is equivalent As the output is more than
the standard so the worker to the standard, the the standard, the worker
is entitled to only time worker is paid the time shall be paid at a high
wages. wages plus a bonus of piece-rate,
20% on time wages.
Time Wages (Time x Rate Rs400 Rs400 Rs720
per hour)
Bonus (Time Wage X 20%) Nil Rs80 Nil
Earning (Time Wage + Rs400 Rs480 Rs720
Bonus)
Gantt Chart: It is a horizontal bar chart used to record the progression of time through the phases of a
project. A Gantt chart is constructed with a horizontal axis representing the total time span of the project and a
vertical axis representing the tasks that make up the project. Horizontal bars are of varying lengths represent the
sequences, timing, and time span for each task. The bar spans may overlap when we do more than one task during
the same time span. To prepare a gantt chart we need to follow following steps-
STEP-1: Determine project and its start date as well as deadline.
STEP-2: List out various activities to be done on the vertical axis.
STEP-3: Define the time duration of project on the horizontal axis.
STEP-4: Evaluate dependant activities & while marking ensure to include these dependency.
STEP-5: Mark progress of each activity and update it until project completion by using horizontal bars.
e.g. To complete an assignment within a five days you come up with the following course of action-
Activity Time Dependant
1. Read Books Day 1 No
2. Read on the internet Day 1 No
3. Review the information Day 1 On 1 & 2, Used Simultaneously
gathered
4. Organize the information Day 2 On 3
gathered
5. Write Day 3 & 4 On 4
6. Recheck it Day 5 On 5
Recheck it Day 5
"Leadership is not defined by the exercise of power but by the capacity to increase
the sense of power among those led.”
Follett advocated the principle of what she termed "integration," or non-coercive power-sharing based on the use of
her concept of "power with" rather than "power over." She thought that workers of all levels should integrate to
reach the organization's goals. If conflict arises, there should be a conscious effort to pull instead of push, and to
work together as a team. Because each member is doing their part, overall, they'll be more likely to be content with
result. Rather than establishing a strict hierarchy and delegating power to certain individuals over others, Follett
believed that workers should practice co-active power. Powering with their team is better than powering over them;
this way, each member feels just as valued as the next. This is not to say that hierarchy should be eliminated entirely,
however. Structure is still crucial, but employees should not feel like they are less valuable than their managers.
e.g. Let us consider a situation of a suitcase manufacturer who is facing problem of decreasing profits.
As manager we have various solutions-
Solution-1: Time study with belief that lower profits are due to lower productivity on the part of workers.
Solution-2: Involve workers more in decisions concerning the methods to use in producing the suitcases based on
the
premise that this will motivate workers to produce more.
Solution-3: Establish a committee of sales & production personnel to coordinate the production & distribution of
goods under the assumption that large inventories are reason for decreasing profits.
Solution as per contingency theory: Application of contingency perspective will enable manager to examine the
situation and to determine the cause of decreased profits before a new procedure or program is implemented, after
this analysis proper solution for the situation can be arrived.
Features
1. Management is externally situational: the conditions of the situation will determine which techniques and
control system should be designed to fit the particular situation.
2. Management is entirely situational.
3. There is no best way of doing anything.
4. One needs to adapt himself to the circumstances.
5. It is a kind of “if” “then” approach.
6. It is a practically suited.
7. Management policies and procedures should respond to environment.
8. Managers should understand that there is no best way of managing. It dispels the universal validity of
principles.
As per my opinion, Contingency theory is designed to provide the managers with the capabilities to examine
numerous possible solutions to a problem & this theory suggests the most appropriate style of management. Theory
is dependent on the context of the situation and that adopting a single, rigid style is inefficient in the long term.
Managers typically pay attention to both the situation and their own styles and make efforts to ensure both interact
efficiently.
University Of Allahabad
Shashwat Gupta
Date of Submission-05/08/2019