Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto

002636-0089

Is there any correlation between grade and

calorie intake in a day?

Candidate Personal Code: 002636-0089

Session: May 2019
Internal Assessment: Mathematical Studies SL

1
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Table of Contents

Introduction 3
Sample of Questionnaire 4
Data Collection 5
Simple Mathematical Process 10
Sophisticated Mathematical Process 15
Validity 23
Conclusion 23

2
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Introduction

“Is there any correlation between grade and calorie intake in a day?”

During the time of adolescence, we often ignore the amount of food we consume.

We neglect the calories intake per meal causing teenagers to have malnutrition

or obese. Often as grade level is increasing, the amount of work also increases

therefore the necessity to keep the energy up is higher for higher grade level.

Also with higher grade level there will be more activities to do meaning that the

amount of nutrition we take is crucial. The idea came up when a healthy diet is

introduced to me and thinking that I have been consuming a lot of calories

I have chosen to investigate in this particular area of topic because I want to

know whether the amount of calories consumed daily have a relationship with the

age of an individual. The hypothesis for this investigation is that age and calorie

intake in a day is independent. To achieve this, I made a survey aimed to 150

students at the age 13,14,15,16,17 from the grade level 8 to 12. There are equal

amount of students per age and per grade level. In the simple mathematical

processes, I will be using mean, median and mode and for more sophisticated

mathematical process I will be using correlation coefficient to determine whether

the two variable between age and calorie intake are correlated or not. On the

other hand the chi squared test is used to test the relationship between age and

calorie intake. Lastly I will be collecting and analyzing the outlier that will affect

the consistency of the data.

3
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Sample of Questionnaire

Name:

Age (circle one)

13 14 15 16 17

Grade (circle one)

8 9 10 11 12

Breakfast (circle one)

(100-200 Calories) (300-400 Calories) (500-600 Calories) (700-800 Calories) (9000-

1000 Calories) (>1000 Calories)

Lunch (circle one)

(100-200 Calories) (300-400 Calories) (500-600 Calories) (700-800 Calories) (9000-

1000 Calories) (>1000 Calories)

Dinner (circle one)

(100-200 Calories) (300-400 Calories) (500-600 Calories) (700-800 Calories) (9000-

1000 Calories) (>1000 Calories)

Signature

________________________

4
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Criterion B - Data Collection

The survey was conducted by The data collected a below took 2 weeks to complete involving
grade level from 8 to 12 with the range of age of 13 -17. The data collected was about the
correlation of age and calorie intake in a day. WRITE A FEW LINE EXPLAINING BELOW

No Name Grade Age Calories

Breakfast (Calories) Lunch (Calories) Dinner (Calories)

1 Ardha Grade 12 17 100-200 300-400 100-200

2 Serafina Grade 12 17 300-400 300-400 500-600

3 Ali Grade 12 17 500-600 1300-1400 300-400
4 Valdano Grade 12 17 300-400 900-1000 500-600
5 Audrey Grade 12 17 300-400 500-600 700-800
6 Josephine Grade 12 17 300-400 700-800 500-600
7 christian Grade 12 17 500-600 500-600 500-600
8 Dhiego Grade 12 17 700-800 900-1000 700-800
9 Brian Grade 12 17 300-400 700-800 900-1000
10 Dennis Grade 12 17 300-400 700-800 500-600
11 Velda Grade 12 17 100-200 700-800 700-800
12 Minsoo Grade 12 17 100-200 100-200 100-200
13 Shaun Grade 12 17 300-400 500-600 700-800
14 Emil Grade 12 17 700-800 700-800 1100-1200
15 Greivance Grade 12 17 300-400 300-400 500-600
16 Syifa Grade 12 17 100-200 500-600 300-400
17 Tristan Grade 12 17 300-400 900-1000 500-600
18 Ashila Grade 12 17 100-200 500-600 500-600
19 Alvaro Grade 12 17 900-1000 1100-1200 900-1000
20 Pasha Grade 12 17 500-600 1100-1200 1100-1200
21 Brandon Grade 12 17 100-200 700-800 900-1000
22 Nathan Grade 12 17 100-200 300-400 300-400
23 Brandley Grade 12 17 100-200 900-1000 300-400
24 Bryan Grade 12 17 100-200 700-800 700-800
25 Richard Grade 12 17 100-200 300-400 100-200
26 Ronan Grade 12 17 300-400 500-600 500-600
27 Derrick Grade 12 17 300-400 700-800 700-800
28 Shania Grade 12 17 100-200 100-200 700-800

5
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

29 Kioko Grade 12 17 500-600 1100-1200 700-800

30 Arsya Grade 12 17 700-800 1300-1400 1100-1200
31 Bayu Grade 11 16 300-400 700-800 500-600
32 Intan Grade 11 16 500-600 700-800 900-1000
33 Sandykong Grade 11 16 100-200 100-200 100-200
34 ER Grade 11 16 300-400 300-400 300-400
35 Shiraz Grade 11 16 100-200 500-600 700-800
36 Gabriel Grade 11 16 500-600 1100-1200 500-600
37 Vita Grade 11 16 300-400 300-400 300-400
38 Majiri Grade 11 16 100-200 300-400 300-400
39 Han Bin Grade 11 16 300-400 300-400 500-600
40 Francheska Grade 11 16 500-600 700-800 500-600
41 Anna Grade 11 16 300-400 300-400 300-400
42 Dito Grade 11 16 300-400 300-400 300-400
43 Timothy Grade 11 16 300-400 700-800 300-400
44 Arriyel Grade 11 16 300-400 700-800 700-800
45 Prayoga Grade 11 16 100-200 300-400 300-400
46 Lorenzo Grade 11 16 500-600 900-1000 700-800
47 Widy Grade 11 16 500-600 700-800 1100-1200
48 Brandon Grade 11 16 300-400 500-600 500-600
49 Natasha Grade 11 16 100-200 500-600 500-600
50 Val Grade 11 16 300-400 300-400 300-400
51 Jelita Grade 11 16 300-400 500-600 500-600
52 Kenia Grade 11 16 300-400 700-800 500-600
53 Gabriel Grade 11 16 100-200 500-600 500-600
54 Stephen Grade 11 16 100-200 500-600 500-600
55 Ralitsa Grade 11 16 500-600 500-600 300-400
56 Dafin Grade 11 16 300-400 500-600 700-800
57 Reihan Grade 11 16 100-200 500-600 500-600
58 Satya Grade 11 16 700-800 1300-1400 1300-1400
59 jan Grade 11 16 500-600 700-800 700-800
60 Alysa Grade 11 16 300-400 900-1000 900-1000
61 Main Grade 10 15 500-600 900-1000 500-600
62 Kresna Grade 10 15 >1100 500-600 1100-1200
63 Nicole Grade 10 15 700-800 1100-1200 700-800
64 Martha Grade 10 15 900-1000 500-600 1100-1200
65 Brian Grade 10 15 >1100 1300-1400 500-600
66 Brenda Grade 10 15 >1000 >1500 >1500
67 Ravaldi Grade 10 15 700-800 1100-1200 700-800

6
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

68 Michael Grade 10 15 500-600 900-1000 500-600

69 Adilla Grade 10 15 >1000 900-1000 1100-1200
70 Kelly Grade 10 15 700-800 500-600 1100-1200
71 Sydney Grade 10 15 900-1000 500-600 900-1000
72 Andrew Grade 10 15 500-600 300-400 900-1000
73 Chelsen Grade 10 15 300-400 900-1000 1300-1400
74 Zeke Grade 10 15 700-800 1300-1400 >1500
75 Agy Grade 10 15 >1100 >1500 900-1000
76 Ryzki Grade 10 15 500-600 500-600 500-600
77 Abrar Grade 10 15 700-800 700-800 700-800
78 Brandon Grade 10 15 700-800 500-600 1100-1200
79 Alesha Grade 10 15 500-600 300-400 700-800
80 James Grade 10 15 >1100 >1500 900-1000
81 Bergas Grade 10 15 >1100 >1500 >1500
82 Dante Grade 10 15 300-400 500-600 700-800
83 Tiara Grade 10 15 500-600 900-1000 300-400
84 Michael Lie Grade 10 15 900-1000 700-800 1100-1200
85 Angel Grade 10 15 500-600 900-1000 300-400
86 Wilson Grade 10 15 300-400 900-1000 700-800
87 Yumna Grade 10 15 100-200 300-400 300-400
88 Alexa Grade 10 15 100-200 300-400 500-600
89 Fiona Grade 10 15 100-200 100-200 500-600
90 Valerie Grade 10 15 300-400 100-200 700-800
91 Janna Grade 9 14 500-600 700-800 1100-1200
92 Aisyah Grade 9 14 100-200 500-600 500-600
93 Kaia Grade 9 14 100-200 1100-1200 900-1000
94 Joshua Grade 9 14 500-600 500-600 500-600
95 Kayla Grade 9 14 100-200 300-400 300-400
96 Sam Grade 9 14 100-200 300-400 500-600
97 Nina Grade 9 14 100-200 700-800 900-1000
98 Fatih Grade 9 14 300-400 900-1000 900-1000
99 Reke Grade 9 14 700-800 700-800 500-600
100 George Grade 9 14 500-600 500-600 500-600
101 Steffi Grade 9 14 300-400 300-400 300-400
102 Ghani Grade 9 14 500-600 500-600 500-600
103 Ashrama Grade 9 14 100-200 500-600 >1500
104 Daffa Grade 9 14 100-200 300-400 300-400
105 Vito Grade 9 14 100-200 700-800 700-800
106 Fauzan Grade 9 14 500-600 900-1000 700-800

7
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

107 Sameer Grade 9 14 700-800 300-400 1300-1400

108 Arnau Grade 9 14 500-600 100-200 100-200
109 Kesia Grade 9 14 300-400 500-600 300-400
110 Claire Grade 9 14 >1000 >1500 >1500
111 Kinanti Grade 9 14 500-600 700-800 900-1000
112 Bianca Grade 9 14 300-400 300-400 500-600
113 Taja Grade 9 14 500-600 300-400 500-600
114 Victor Grade 9 14 700-800 700-800 9000-1000
115 Aaron Grade 9 14 500-600 1100-1200 >1500
116 Maurice Grade 9 14 300-400 500-600 500-600
117 Sheryl Grade 9 14 500-600 500-600 300-400
118 Shafa Grade 9 14 100-200 900-1000 900-1000
119 Dale Grade 9 14 500-600 900-1000 1100-1200
120 Selvyne Grade 9 14 500-600 500-600 700-800
121 Ocean Grade 8 13 100-200 700-800 700-800
122 Davin Grade 8 13 700-800 900-1000 700-800
123 Zadi Grade 8 13 300-400 500-600 700-800
124 Ryan Grade 8 13 300-400 700-800 900-1000
125 Fevok Grade 8 13 100-200 300-400 500-600
126 Sali Grade 8 13 300-400 700-800 500-600
127 Teresa Grade 8 13 300-400 300-400 500-600
128 Sheryl Grade 8 13 300-400 700-800 300-400
129 Sasya Grade 8 13 100-200 500-600 300-400
130 Aaliyan Grade 8 13 100-200 900-1000 900-1000
131 Audi Grade 8 13 100-200 100-200 300-400
132 Auiel Grade 8 13 100-200 100-200 100-200
133 Hayoung Grade 8 13 500-600 700-800 700-800
134 Shafa Grade 8 13 300-400 300-400 300-400
135 Yeon Seo Grade 8 13 500-600 500-600 500-600
136 Kayra Grade 8 13 100-200 100-200 100-200
137 Emily Grade 8 13 300-400 500-600 700-800
138 Cherilynn Grade 8 13 100-200 300-400 300-400
139 Amel Grade 8 13 100-200 300-400 100-200
140 Jessica Grade 8 13 100-200 300-400 100-200
141 Princess Grade 8 13 100-200 500-600 700-800
142 Selvyne Grade 8 13 100-200 100-200 300-400
143 Aliya Grade 8 13 100-200 300-400 500-600
144 Edbert Grade 8 13 300-400 500-600 900-1000

8
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

145 Eduard Grade 8 13 700-800 1100-1200 900-1000

Saputra
146 Aisha Grade 8 13 300-400 700-800 700-800
147 Alvin Grade 8 13 700-800 1100-1200 900-1000
148 Byan.T Grade 8 13 500-600 500-600 700-800
149 Ishkandar Grade 8 13 500-600 700-800 900-1000
150 Sam Grade 8 13 300-400 1100-1200 700-800

Criterion C: Simple Mathematical Processes

Simple mathematical processes: WHAT, WHY, WHERE

The first process that I’m going to make and grouped the data collected from the survey. This
process takes quite sometime to make and it used as a part of this internal assessment. For this
assessment. From the data gathered, I made several graphics that will show the grouping of the
data where it is divided into 4 categories, they are 300-1300, 1301-2300, 2301-3300, >3300.
Where the first category shows the number of people who consumed less than should and the
fourth categories shows people who consumes over than they should.

Table 1 - The correlation between grade and calorie

Grade
No Calories 8 9 10 11 12
1 300-1300 12 8 4 14 9
2 1301-2300 15 16 10 14 15
3 2301-3300 3 5 11 1 6
4 > 3300 0 1 5 1 0
Total 30 30 30 30 30

From the data obtained above, it can be seen the grade level that consumes the most calories
lies in grade 10 where there are 11 people that got… calories between 2301 and 3300. When it
is reviewed statistically, therefore grade 10 suffers from obese or excessive nutrition intake.
Where as grade 11 is the grade level; who only got a tiny amount of calorie intake. It can be see
that 14 people who consumes the calorie of 300-1300 meaning that grade 11 didn’t get enough
nutrition that causes fatigue during activities throughout the day.

- Graph-1 (Bar Graph)

9
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Calori Intake vs Grade

18
16
14
12
Calories

10 300-1300
8 1301-2300
6
2301-3300
4
2 > 3300
0
8 9 10 11 12
Grade

If we look further from the graph above it can be seen that grades 8 and 12 do not consume
excessive calories in the range below 3,300 calories where we can assume that grade 8 the
grade level that consumes the least sufficient amount of food, considering the needs for grade
12 it is expected that with the amount of work and sleep they have been getting they should
consume more.

Other than bar chart, I also tried to make a pie chart for each of the grade level. This help me to
know the distribution of calories distributed for each class shown with the calculations below.

FOR REFERENCE BECAUSE THE AGE AND THE GRADE IS CONSTANT, THE WORD
GRADE SHOWS THE AGE OF THE SUBJECTS.
Grade 8 :
1. 12/30 *100%= 40
2. 15/30 * 100%= 50
3. 3/30 *100%= 10
4. 0/30*100%= 0
Grade 9: 8/30 *100%= 26.7
16/30 *100%= 53.3
5/30*100%= 16.7
1/30*100%= 0.033
Grade 10:
1. 4/30*100%=13.3
2. 10/30*100%=33.3
3. 11/30*100%=36.7
4. 5/30*100%= 16.7
Grade 11

10
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

1. 14/30*100%= 0.47
2. 14/30*100%= 0.47
3. 1/30*100%=0.033
4. 1/30*100%=0.033
Grade 12
1. 9/30*100%= 30
2. 15/30*100% 15/30*=9.9
3. 6/30*100%=25
4. 0/30*100%= 0
Grade
No Calories 8 9 10 11 12
1 300-1300 12 8 4 14 9
2 1301-2300 15 16 10 14 15
3 2301-3300 3 5 11 1 6
4 > 3300 0 1 5 1 0

Graph-2 (Pie Chart)

Calories Intake Grade 8

0%

10%
300-1300
40%
1301-2300
2301-3300
50% > 3300

11
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Calories Intake Grade 9

3%

17% 27% 300-1300

1301-2300
2301-3300
> 3300
53%

Calories Intake Grade 10

17% 13%
300-1300
1301-2300

33% 2301-3300
37% > 3300

Calories Intake Grade 11

3% 3%

300-1300
47% 1301-2300
2301-3300
47%
> 3300

12
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Calories Intake Grade 12

0%

20%
30% 300-1300
1301-2300
2301-3300
> 3300
50%

From all the graph above, we can see that grade 11 or the student age of 16 consumes the
most calories in a day. Its also clear that grade 9 or the student at the age of 14 consumes the
less amount of calorie in a day. The data also shows that the calories intake for grade 8 is well
balance and they are living in a healthy diet. At the same time the data from grade 12 shows a
well balanced nutrition in take in a day considering the amount of work that they required to do.

13
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Box and whisker plot

To show different complete processes in statistic, Box and whisker plot also has been made
where it shows the summary of the 5 most important data which is the minimum, Q1 (lower
quartile), median, Q3 (upper quartile) and maximum value from the graph. From the graph
above, the following data can be extracted:
1. Minimum:450
2. Q1: 1250
3. Median: 1650
4. Q3:2250
5. Maximum:4400
Then I calculate the outlier where the outliers are unnatural data in statistical calculations and
must be issued so as not to cause data failure, where the outlier formula is
Outlier upper boundary = 1.5 x IQR +Q3 = 1.5 x 1000 + 2250 = 3750
Outlier lower boundary= Q1 -1.5 X IQR = 1250 – 1.5 x 1000 = -250

And after I analyzed there were two outliers, they were grade 10 as many as 4,300
calories and 4,400 calories, where the two data were unnatural data and had to be issued in
statistical calculations. I tried to use the method so that my statistical calculations are precise
and accurate

14
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Criterion C: Sophisticated Mathematical Processes

- Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient is according to
(https://mathbits.com/MathBits/TISection/Statistics2/correlation.htm) measures the strength
and the direction of a linear relationship between two variables. This shows the two variables
between grade and number of calories with the data shown below (try making more sentences)

Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient:

Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient is used to measure whether or not the
two existing variable (age and calorie intake) are correlated. The equation1 is as
below:
𝑆𝑥𝑦
r=
𝑆𝑥𝑆𝑦

∑(𝑥− 𝑥̅ )(𝑦 –𝑦̅)

Where Sxy = is the covariance of X and Y According to
𝑛
(https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/29713/what-is-covariance-in-plain-language)
Covariance is a measure of how changes in one variable are associated with
changes in a second variable.

∑(𝑥− 𝑥̅ )2
Sx = √ is the standard deviation of x According to
𝑛
(https://www.robertniles.com/stats/stdev.shtml ) standard deviation is a measure
of dispersement in statics. Dispersement tells you how much your data is spread
out.

∑(𝑦− 𝑦̅)2
Sy = √ is the standard deviation of y
𝑛

∑(𝑥− 𝑥̅ )(𝑦 –𝑦̅)

So, r =
√∑(𝑥− 𝑥̅ )2 √∑(𝑦− 𝑦̅ )2

And also I use line best fit to predict grade level below grade 8 so that the data
needed can be analyzed from grades 8-12 with line best fit

Best fit Line Formula

15
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

X mean = 10
Y mean = 1814.8
Sx = 1.4142
Sy = 805.1647
m = gradient = r* Sx/Sy = 0.018 X1.4142/805.1647 = 10.367
m is positive hence the curve goes upward
b = (y mean) - (m*x mean)
b = 1814.8 – 10.367 *10 = 1711.13

so the line equation becomes y = mx + b = 10.367 x + 1711.13 and when viewed

from the graph below then the equation of the line is precise

Age vs Calories
5000
4500
4000 y = 10.367x + 1711.1
R² = 0.0003
3500
3000
Calories

2500
Calories (y)
2000
1500 Linear (Calories (y))
1000
500
0
8 9 10 11 12 13
Grade

The scatter diagram shows r2=0.00033, meaning that there is no correlation

between age and calorie intake in a day.

Calories Mean
Grade (x) Mean (xi) (y) of (yi) (x-xi) (y-yi) (xi-x)(yi-y) (x-xi)2 (y-yi)2
12 10 650 1814.8 2 -1164.8 -2329.6 4 1356759
12 10 1250 1814.8 2 -564.8 -1129.6 4 318999
12 10 2250 1814.8 2 435.2 870.4 4 189399
12 10 1950 1814.8 2 135.2 270.4 4 18279.04
12 10 1750 1814.8 2 -64.8 -129.6 4 4199.04
12 10 1750 1814.8 2 -64.8 -129.6 4 4199.04
12 10 1650 1814.8 2 -164.8 -329.6 4 27159.04
12 10 2450 1814.8 2 635.2 1270.4 4 403479

16
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

12 10 2050 1814.8 2 235.2 470.4 4 55319.04

12 10 1650 1814.8 2 -164.8 -329.6 4 27159.04
12 10 1650 1814.8 2 -164.8 -329.6 4 27159.04
12 10 450 1814.8 2 -1364.8 -2729.6 4 1862679
12 10 1650 1814.8 2 -164.8 -329.6 4 27159.04
12 10 2650 1814.8 2 835.2 1670.4 4 697559
12 10 1250 1814.8 2 -564.8 -1129.6 4 318999
12 10 1050 1814.8 2 -764.8 -1529.6 4 584919
12 10 1850 1814.8 2 35.2 70.4 4 1239.04
12 10 1250 1814.8 2 -564.8 -1129.6 4 318999
12 10 3050 1814.8 2 1235.2 2470.4 4 1525719
12 10 2850 1814.8 2 1035.2 2070.4 4 1071639
12 10 1850 1814.8 2 35.2 70.4 4 1239.04
12 10 850 1814.8 2 -964.8 -1929.6 4 930839
12 10 1450 1814.8 2 -364.8 -729.6 4 133079
12 10 1650 1814.8 2 -164.8 -329.6 4 27159.04
12 10 650 1814.8 2 -1164.8 -2329.6 4 1356759
12 10 1450 1814.8 2 -364.8 -729.6 4 133079
12 10 1850 1814.8 2 35.2 70.4 4 1239.04
12 10 1050 1814.8 2 -764.8 -1529.6 4 584919
12 10 2450 1814.8 2 635.2 1270.4 4 403479
12 10 3250 1814.8 2 1435.2 2870.4 4 2059799
11 10 1650 1814.8 1 -164.8 -164.8 1 27159.04
11 10 2250 1814.8 1 435.2 435.2 1 189399
11 10 450 1814.8 1 -1364.8 -1364.8 1 1862679
11 10 1050 1814.8 1 -764.8 -764.8 1 584919
11 10 1450 1814.8 1 -364.8 -364.8 1 133079
11 10 2250 1814.8 1 435.2 435.2 1 189399
11 10 1050 1814.8 1 -764.8 -764.8 1 584919
11 10 850 1814.8 1 -964.8 -964.8 1 930839
11 10 1250 1814.8 1 -564.8 -564.8 1 318999
11 10 1850 1814.8 1 35.2 35.2 1 1239.04
11 10 1050 1814.8 1 -764.8 -764.8 1 584919
11 10 1050 1814.8 1 -764.8 -764.8 1 584919
11 10 1450 1814.8 1 -364.8 -364.8 1 133079
11 10 1850 1814.8 1 35.2 35.2 1 1239.04
11 10 850 1814.8 1 -964.8 -964.8 1 930839
11 10 2250 1814.8 1 435.2 435.2 1 189399
11 10 2450 1814.8 1 635.2 635.2 1 403479
11 10 1450 1814.8 1 -364.8 -364.8 1 133079
11 10 1250 1814.8 1 -564.8 -564.8 1 318999

17
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

11 10 1250 1814.8 1 -564.8 -564.8 1 318999

11 10 1250 1814.8 1 -564.8 -564.8 1 318999
11 10 1650 1814.8 1 -164.8 -164.8 1 27159.04
11 10 1250 1814.8 1 -564.8 -564.8 1 318999
11 10 1250 1814.8 1 -564.8 -564.8 1 318999
11 10 1450 1814.8 1 -364.8 -364.8 1 133079
11 10 1650 1814.8 1 -164.8 -164.8 1 27159.04
11 10 1250 1814.8 1 -564.8 -564.8 1 318999
11 10 3450 1814.8 1 1635.2 1635.2 1 2673879
11 10 2050 1814.8 1 235.2 235.2 1 55319.04
11 10 2250 1814.8 1 435.2 435.2 1 189399
10 10 2050 1814.8 0 235.2 0 0 55319.04
10 10 2900 1814.8 0 1085.2 0 0 1177659
10 10 2650 1814.8 0 835.2 0 0 697559
10 10 2650 1814.8 0 835.2 0 0 697559
10 10 3100 1814.8 0 1285.2 0 0 1651739
10 10 4300 1814.8 0 2485.2 0 0 6176219
10 10 2650 1814.8 0 835.2 0 0 697559
10 10 2050 1814.8 0 235.2 0 0 55319.04
10 10 3200 1814.8 0 1385.2 0 0 1918779
10 10 2450 1814.8 0 635.2 0 0 403479
10 10 2450 1814.8 0 635.2 0 0 403479
10 10 1850 1814.8 0 35.2 0 0 1239.04
10 10 2650 1814.8 0 835.2 0 0 697559
10 10 3700 1814.8 0 1885.2 0 0 3553979
10 10 3750 1814.8 0 1935.2 0 0 3744999
10 10 1650 1814.8 0 -164.8 0 0 27159.04
10 10 2250 1814.8 0 435.2 0 0 189399
10 10 2450 1814.8 0 635.2 0 0 403479
10 10 1650 1814.8 0 -164.8 0 0 27159.04
10 10 3750 1814.8 0 1935.2 0 0 3744999
10 10 4400 1814.8 0 2585.2 0 0 6683259
10 10 1650 1814.8 0 -164.8 0 0 27159.04
10 10 1850 1814.8 0 35.2 0 0 1239.04
10 10 2850 1814.8 0 1035.2 0 0 1071639
10 10 1850 1814.8 0 35.2 0 0 1239.04
10 10 2050 1814.8 0 235.2 0 0 55319.04
10 10 850 1814.8 0 -964.8 0 0 930839
10 10 1050 1814.8 0 -764.8 0 0 584919
10 10 850 1814.8 0 -964.8 0 0 930839
10 10 1250 1814.8 0 -564.8 0 0 318999

18
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

9 10 2450 1814.8 -1 635.2 -635.2 1 403479

9 10 1250 1814.8 -1 -564.8 564.8 1 318999
9 10 2250 1814.8 -1 435.2 -435.2 1 189399
9 10 1650 1814.8 -1 -164.8 164.8 1 27159.04
9 10 850 1814.8 -1 -964.8 964.8 1 930839
9 10 1050 1814.8 -1 -764.8 764.8 1 584919
9 10 1850 1814.8 -1 35.2 -35.2 1 1239.04
9 10 2250 1814.8 -1 435.2 -435.2 1 189399
9 10 2050 1814.8 -1 235.2 -235.2 1 55319.04
9 10 1650 1814.8 -1 -164.8 164.8 1 27159.04
9 10 1050 1814.8 -1 -764.8 764.8 1 584919
9 10 1650 1814.8 -1 -164.8 164.8 1 27159.04
9 10 2300 1814.8 -1 485.2 -485.2 1 235419
9 10 850 1814.8 -1 -964.8 964.8 1 930839
9 10 1650 1814.8 -1 -164.8 164.8 1 27159.04
9 10 2250 1814.8 -1 435.2 -435.2 1 189399
9 10 2450 1814.8 -1 635.2 -635.2 1 403479
9 10 850 1814.8 -1 -964.8 964.8 1 930839
9 10 1250 1814.8 -1 -564.8 564.8 1 318999
9 10 4300 1814.8 -1 2485.2 -2485.2 1 6176219
9 10 2250 1814.8 -1 435.2 -435.2 1 189399
9 10 1250 1814.8 -1 -564.8 564.8 1 318999
9 10 1450 1814.8 -1 -364.8 364.8 1 133079
9 10 2450 1814.8 -1 635.2 -635.2 1 403479
9 10 3300 1814.8 -1 1485.2 -1485.2 1 2205819
9 10 1450 1814.8 -1 -364.8 364.8 1 133079
9 10 1450 1814.8 -1 -364.8 364.8 1 133079
9 10 2050 1814.8 -1 235.2 -235.2 1 55319.04
9 10 2650 1814.8 -1 835.2 -835.2 1 697559
9 10 1850 1814.8 -1 35.2 -35.2 1 1239.04
8 10 1650 1814.8 -2 -164.8 329.6 4 27159.04
8 10 2450 1814.8 -2 635.2 -1270.4 4 403479
8 10 1650 1814.8 -2 -164.8 329.6 4 27159.04
8 10 2050 1814.8 -2 235.2 -470.4 4 55319.04
8 10 1050 1814.8 -2 -764.8 1529.6 4 584919
8 10 1650 1814.8 -2 -164.8 329.6 4 27159.04
8 10 1250 1814.8 -2 -564.8 1129.6 4 318999
8 10 1450 1814.8 -2 -364.8 729.6 4 133079
8 10 1050 1814.8 -2 -764.8 1529.6 4 584919
8 10 2050 1814.8 -2 235.2 -470.4 4 55319.04
8 10 650 1814.8 -2 -1164.8 2329.6 4 1356759

19
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

8 10 450 1814.8 -2 -1364.8 2729.6 4 1862679

8 10 2050 1814.8 -2 235.2 -470.4 4 55319.04
8 10 1050 1814.8 -2 -764.8 1529.6 4 584919
8 10 1650 1814.8 -2 -164.8 329.6 4 27159.04
8 10 450 1814.8 -2 -1364.8 2729.6 4 1862679
8 10 1650 1814.8 -2 -164.8 329.6 4 27159.04
8 10 850 1814.8 -2 -964.8 1929.6 4 930839
8 10 650 1814.8 -2 -1164.8 2329.6 4 1356759
8 10 650 1814.8 -2 -1164.8 2329.6 4 1356759
8 10 1450 1814.8 -2 -364.8 729.6 4 133079
8 10 650 1814.8 -2 -1164.8 2329.6 4 1356759
8 10 1050 1814.8 -2 -764.8 1529.6 4 584919
8 10 1850 1814.8 -2 35.2 -70.4 4 1239.04
8 10 2850 1814.8 -2 1035.2 -2070.4 4 1071639
8 10 1850 1814.8 -2 35.2 -70.4 4 1239.04
8 10 2850 1814.8 -2 1035.2 -2070.4 4 1071639
8 10 1850 1814.8 -2 35.2 -70.4 4 1239.04
8 10 2250 1814.8 -2 435.2 -870.4 4 189399
8 10 2220 1814.8 -2 405.2 -810.4 4 164187
1.77351E-
sum 0 11 3110 300 97243544

Mean:
𝑋 = 10, 𝑌 = 1814.8

300
Sx = √ = 1.412
150

97243544
Sy = √ = 805.164
150

3110
Sxy = = 20.73
150

3110
r = = 0.018208
√300 𝑥 97243544

r2 = 0.000331542

Value Strength of Correlation

20
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

0 ≤ r < ± 0.1 No correlation

± 0.1 ≤ r < ± 0. Very weak correlation
± 0.5 ≤ r ± 0.87 Weak correlation
± 0.87 ≤ r ± 0.95 Moderate correlation
± 0.95 ≤ r ± 1 Strong Correlation
R=±1 Very Strong Correlation

Since r is 0.000331542, the strength of correlation of this data shows no correlation

between calories intake in a day and their age.

- Chi Squared Test

H0: Age is independent to his/her calorie intake in a day
H1: Age is not independent to his/her calorie intake in a day

Hypothesis test in this research will be using comparing chi square and critical value in the
table. If the chi square is lower than the critical value, then the null hypothesis will be accepted.
If chi square is higher than critical value, the the null hypothesis will be rejected and the
hypothesis will be accepted.5% is used as the significance level for testing the null and
alternative hypothesis. .5% significance level means the 95% of time the null hypothesis will be
correct.5% significance level means the 95% of the time the alternative hypothesis will be
correct.
Observed
No Calories 8 9 10 11 12 Total
1 300-1300 12 8 4 14 9 47
2 1301-2300 15 16 10 14 15 70
3 2301-3300 3 5 11 1 6 26
4 > 3300 0 1 5 1 0 7
Total 30 30 30 30 30 150

Expected
No Calories 8 9 10 11 12 Total
1 300-1300 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 47
2 1301-2300 14 14 14 14 14 70
3 2301-3300 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 26
4 > 3300 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 7
Total 30 30 30 30 30 150

Observed- Expected
No Calories 8 9 10 11 12 Total
1 300-1300 2.6 -1.4 -5.4 4.6 -0.4 47
2 1301-2300 1 2 -4 0 1 70
3 2301-3300 -2.2 -0.2 5.8 -4.2 0.8 26

21
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

4 > 3300 -1.4 -0.4 3.6 -0.4 -1.4 7

(Observed- Expected)2/ Expected

No Calories 8 9 10 11 12 Total
1 300-1300 0.719149 0.208511 3.102128 2.251064 0.017021 6.297872
2 1301-2300 0.071429 0.285714 1.142857 0 0.071429 1.571429
3 2301-3300 0.930769 0.007692 6.469231 3.392308 0.123077 10.92308
4 > 3300 1.4 0.114286 9.257143 0.114286 1.4 12.28571
Total 3.121347 0.616203 19.97136 5.757657 1.611527 31.07809

Degrees of Freedom (df)

Df = (row-1) (column-1)
= (4-1)(5-1)
= 3 x 4 = 12
Chi Square Critical Value

p = 0.05 df = 12 21.026

Looking at the table above, as we can see the degrees of freedom is 12 therefore with the 5%
significance level, the critical value will be 21.03. With the value of 31.07809 I can conclude that
that the null hypothesis which stated that the calorie intake in a day and age are independent is
rejected / not accepted.

22
 Muhammad Rifqi Dwi Budianto
002636-0089

Validity
chi square calculation < Chi
Square Critical Value This investigation turned out to be not what I expected to be, the
21.03 < 31.07809 chi squared the graph shows how both variable has no correlation.

therefore, we must reject
our null hypothesis Ho and
conclude that calorie intake
in a day and age are not
independent.
Also from the graph we can see that the connection between the
two variables are very weak. The null hypothesis or Ho turned out
to be true with using the mathematical process such as comparing
the result of critical value and chi squared value.

In the near future, it is good to get more reliable data. Unlike the
recent data, it is not very helpful to use to investigate because no
subjects tested were aware of their calorie intake in a day. Processing the data, we can see a
lot of biases, such things happened because of their lack of knowledge of the investigation and
the variable itself. From the look of it, most of my questionnaire were filled honestly because I
guided my test subject on calculating the amount of calories they take per meal and add them
all.

Conclusion
From the investigation that has been conducted, it is proven that the result supports the
hypothesis. The results show that there was no correlation between the two variables which is
the age and the calorie intake in a day. Errors was found in this investigation mostly occurs in
the gathering data process. Talking about correlation, it is found that during testing the Ho with
the chi squared test and critical value, the chi square is lower than critical value meaning that
the null hypothesis is accepted. The null hypothesis for this investigation is age and calorie
intake in a day are independent. Some limitations that can be found is that people are not
actually aware of how much calorie they consume in a day. The data would be more accurate if
a chart of food with the quantity of calorie is provided to the test subjects.

To be precise the data shows that the degrees of freedom is 12 therefore with the 5%
significance level, the critical value will be 21.03. With the value of 31.07809 I can conclude that
that the null hypothesis which stated that the calorie intake in a day and age are independent is
rejected / not accepted.

23