Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The term ‘Deaf Culture’ appeared in the literature recently after the late 1970s, even
though some of Deaf culture components were categorized under subculture, or Deaf community
life. Also, Deaf world, Deaf community, and Deaf way were similar to Deaf culture concept
which could be found in Deaf periodicals and literature (Ladd, 2003). In 1971, Schlesinger and
Meadow discussed that being deaf was much more than a medical diagnosis; it was a cultural
phenomenon, and the authors used the term Deaf subculture in Deaf community to presented
deaf individuals. Lack the understand of Deaf culture resulted in neglecting sign language as
well as deaf history (Ladd & Lane, 2013). Padden and Markowitz were defining community as a
group of individuals who shared a common culture and applied that to Deaf communities (Ladd,
2003). Moreover, deaf community referred deaf ethnolinguistic group, deaf ethnic group, and
deaf culture as a minority culture group (Erting, 1978; Gannon, 2011; Becker ,1983). Padden and
Humphries (2003) defined Deaf culture using practices and beliefs, especially the key duty of
sign language in the daily lives of the deaf individuals. The characteristics of culture make a
distinction between Deaf culture and hearing culture. Padden and Humphries (2005) borrowed
from James Woodward’s model of adopting the capitalized word Deaf to define the cultural
norms of a group within a Deaf community and the lower-case is used to denote the condition, or
the broader cluster of individuals without making proper references to the Deaf culture (Hoffman
Padden (2008) emphasized the manners of visual communication that points to a long
history of interactions in cultural manners. Aspects such as the sign language, theater, poetry,
jobs, and deaf schools were identified as the nature of “Deaf culture” by Padden (Edwards,
2012). Deaf individuals, according to Padden, have been isolated for a long time that their
history sets them apart from other population groups, and it made hearing individuals feel
strange to interact or join the company of other groups of people who are different from them
(Harvey, 2005). It suggests that deaf individuals have developed not only a new terminology, but
also a new form of understanding or consciousness about their behaviors and personality
(Reagan, 1995).
“talking culture” from “culture talking,” similar to the observations of Jim Clifford in his
classification of modern cultures (Rosen, 2007). Understanding the theme of Deaf culture can
emerge from comparing the perceptions of Padden with Holcomb. Holcomb (2013) argues that
the core values of Deaf culture consists of the importance of having full access to
Padden stresses the tradition definition of Deaf culture which emphasizes the value of residential
school experiences, Deaf club, and ASL. Also, Holcomb adds the rich social lives founded on a
treasured sign language that define a network of educations, athletic, artistic, and social
opportunities of the deaf people. Padden (2005), on the other hand, asserts that there are few
places that Deaf individuals can consider their own. She argues that for most of their long history
in America, Deaf individuals have occupied places created by other population groups and
largely controlled by individuals who have limited experiences with being Deaf (Scheetz, 2004).
She states that the Deaf institutions had places organized and designed exclusively for Deaf
children by their benefactors and teachers. Although Holcomb suggests that a greater share of
Deaf Culture take pride in being Deaf may be the reason Deaf Culture today is different than
Deaf culture of yesterday, but it is still a vibrant and relevant entity (Horejes, 2012; Leigh,
Becker, G. (1983). Growing old in silence: Deaf people and old age. Berkeley, CA: University
of California Press.
Edwards, R. A. (2012). Words made flesh: Nineteenth-century deaf education and the growth of
Erting, C. J. (1978). Cultural conflict in a school for deaf children. Anthropology & Education
Gannon, J. (2011). Deaf heritage: A narrative history of deaf America. Washington, DC:
Harvey, M. A. (2005). A breath of fresh air. [A review of Inside deaf culture: C, Padden, & T,
doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enj015
Hoffman, D., & Andrews, J. F. (2016). Why deaf culture matters in deaf education. [ A review of
doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enw044
Holcomb, T. K. (2013). Introduction to American deaf culture. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
Leigh, I. W., Andrews, J. F., & Harris, R. L. (2018). Deaf culture: Exploring deaf communities
Padden, C., & Humphries, T. L. (2003). Deaf in America: voices from a culture. Cambridge,
Padden, C. & Humphries, T. (2005). Inside deaf culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Padden, C. (2008) The decline of deaf clubs in the united states: A treatise on the problem of
place. In H.-D. L. Bauman (Ed.), Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking (pp. 169–176).
Padden, C. A. (2005). Talking culture: Deaf people and disability studies. Modern Language
Reagan, T. (1995). A sociocultural understanding of deafness: American sign language and the
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/014717679500007X
Rosen, R. S. (2007). Looking inside or outside? [A review of Inside deaf culture: C, Padden, &
doi:10.1093/deafed/enm016
Schlesinger, H. S., & Meadow, K. P. (1971). Sound and sign: Childhood deafness and mental