Int Aquat Res (2017) 9:81–88

DOI 10.1007/s40071-016-0150-1

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Surface water quality and deforestation of the Purus river

basin, Brazilian Amazon
Eduardo Antonio Rı́os-Villamizar . Maria T. F. Piedade .
Wolfgang J. Junk . Andréa Viviana Waichman

Received: 7 October 2016 / Accepted: 21 November 2016 / Published online: 2 December 2016
Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Abstract In the last years, deforestation constitutes a threat for the aquatic ecosystems. This paper aims to
characterize the water quality of the Purus river in the Brazilian Amazon, and investigate the relations between
water quality and deforestation of the Purus river basin over a 9-year period, as well as to quantify the Purus
river basin’s land cover changes (%) in a 5-year period. Sampling data from upstream to downstream show a
decrease in pH-value, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, and total suspended solids. Correlation
analysis revealed a significant negative correlation of the accumulated total deforestation values (km2) with
the pH-value (in all the study sites), and a significant positive correlation with temperature (only in two sites).
However, the deforestation rates (km2/year) did not present, in none of the study stations, any significant
correlation with water quality parameters. It seems that the effects of deforestation on water quality are related
not with the rate but with the total area deforested. It was estimated that the basin’s forested area decreased by
5.17%. Since similar attributes are common in other basins of the whitewater systems of the Brazilian
Amazon, this results may be seen as a warning on the effects of deforestation on water quality (reduction in pH
and increment in temperature values), in larger areas than those of our study sites. To maintain the conser-
vation and preservation status of the Purus river basin, it is necessary, the implementation of a transboundary
watershed management program that could serve as a conservation model for Brazil and other countries of the
Amazonian region.

Keywords Amazon basin
Deforestation
Purus
Water quality

Introduction

The Amazon, that presents different characteristics among others Brazilian hydrographic areas, is one of the
world’s unique regions containing most of the usable water resources in Brazil. This water potential displays

E. A. Rı́os-Villamizar (&)
M. T. F. Piedade

Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia/Ecologia, Monitoramento e Uso Sustentável de Áreas Úmidas Amazônicas
(Grupo MAUA/CDAM/INPA), Campus I, Av. André Araújo, 2.936, Petrópolis, Caixa Postal 478, CEP: 69067-375 Manaus,
Brazil
e-mail: eduardorios17@hotmail.com

W. J. Junk
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Áreas Úmidas (INCT-INAU-UFMT), Cuiabá, Brazil

A. V. Waichman
Universidade Federal do Amazonas - UFAM/ICB, Manaus, Brazil

123
82 Int Aquat Res (2017) 9:81–88

privileged place into the speeches on Amazonian sustainable development. Water chemistry provides
important parameters for quantifying biogeochemical cycles and determines management options in river
systems and wetlands. The first scientific classification of Amazonian rivers was elaborated by Sioli (1956)
who used water color, transparency, pH and electrical conductivity to explain limnological characteristics of
the large Amazonian rivers and correlated these characteristics to the geological properties of the river
catchments, a landscape ecology approach. Whitewater rivers (such as the Amazon, Juruá and Madeira) are
turbid and have their origins in the Andes, from which they transport large amounts of nutrient-rich sediments.
Their waters have near neutral pH and relatively high concentrations of dissolved solids indicated by the
electric conductivity that varies between 40 and 140 lS cm-1. Blackwater rivers (such as the Negro River)
drain the Precambrian Guiana shield, which is characterized by large areas of white sands (podzols), their
waters show low quantities of suspended matter but high amounts of humic acids that give the water a
brownish-reddish color. The pH values of such rivers are in the range of 4–5 and their electrical conductivity is
\20 lS cm-1. Clearwater rivers (such as the Tapajós and Xingu rivers) have their upper catchments in the
Cerrado region of the Central Brazilian archaic shield. The transparency of their greenish waters is above
1.5 m, with low amounts of sediments and dissolved solids, electrical conductivity is in the range of
10–20 lS cm-1, and pH that varies between 6 and 7 in large rivers.
Rı́os-Villamizar et al. (2014) classified a number of rivers using the combination of several parameters such
as alkali (Na, K) and alkali-earth (Ca, Mg) metals, major anions, electrical conductivity, pH, Ntotal, Ptotal, water
color and suspended sediment load to distinguish the three classical water types (white, black and clear) and to
separate other water bodies with intermediate position, concluding that many rivers and streams have to be
considered as mixed waters resulting from the influence of lower order tributaries with different physico-
chemical properties of their waters. According to this classification system, the Purus river is a whitewater
river but many of its tributaries are of intermediate type (Rı́os-Villamizar et al. in preparation) if considering
that the geology of the pre-Andean zone is rather heterogeneous with large old sedimentation areas (paleo-
varzeas), which sediments are strongly weathered, but still have a higher bioelement content than the tertiary
sediments of the central Amazon basin and the soils on the archaic shields.
The Purus river is one of the chief tributaries of the Solimões/Amazon River system, being one of the
longest rivers in South America, rising in the eastern lowlands of Peru and flowing about 3380 kilometres (km)
before entering Solimões river at the northwestern Brazil. The estimated water volume that is generated within
the Purus river basin is about 8500 m3 s-1, and the total area of this basin is about 375,458 km2. The Purus
basin is classified into the basin group that still is in a high conservation status in the Brazilian Amazon
(Fig. 1). However, in recent years, the cattle ranching, the advance of the agricultural frontier mainly for
soybean production and the associated deforestation constitute a threat for the aquatic ecosystems.

Materials and methods

The aims of this paper are to diagnose water quality changes at the main channel of the Purus river, and to
relate these with deforestation rates (km2/year) and accumulated total deforestation values (km2) of the Purus

Fig. 1 A section of the middle/lower Purus river basin

123
Int Aquat Res (2017) 9:81–88 83

Fig. 2 Location of the ANA’s water quality monitoring stations on the Purus river: 1 Seringal Caridade (Municipal District of
Boca do Acre); 2 Seringal Fortaleza (Municipal District of Pauini); 3 Lábrea (Municipal District of Lábrea); 4 Arumã (Municipal
District of Beruri). Classes: green color forest; blue color hydrography

basin, over a 9-year period, to detect spatial and temporal relationships, using Spearman’s rank and Pearson
correlation analysis, which were performed using Open Stat 4.0. The time series of data were constituted by
the results of, at least, three samplings per year in each monitoring station. The information on deforestation
(PRODES 2007) was reported by the Brazilian National Institute of Spatial Research (INPE), and the data
regarding to water quality were recorded by the Brazilian National Agency of Water (ANA) (HIDROWEB
2007), see Fig. 2. Water samples were collected in the center of the river channel using acid-washed poly-
ethylene bottles, which were rinsed with the water being collected and the samples were manually collected
beneath the surface and kept cool until the time of analysis. Water samples were filtered through Whatman
GF/F fiberglass filters (0.45 lm). The values of electrical conductivity (lS cm-1 at 25 °C), dissolved oxygen
(mg O2 l-1), temperature (°C) and pH were measured in the field (on site). In the laboratory, the values of
turbidity (NTU) and total suspended solids (mg l-1) were analyzed. All the analyses were carried out by
standard methods (APHA 2005). The Purus river basin’s land cover changes (%), in a 5-year period, also were
identified (diagnosed) by comparing two maps which used remote sensing and geographical information
systems (GIS) techniques.

Results and discussion

Water quality trends

The waters of the Purus river basin showed characteristics of Amazonian natural waters (Furch and Junk
1997). The electrical conductivity and the total suspended solids decrease from upstream to downstream of the
Purus river, probably explained because of the increase of activities associated with the use of land, such as
deforestation, cattle breeding and agriculture, concentrated in the municipalities of Boca do Acre and Lábrea,
which are located in the Amazonas State in Brazil. It could be related with four deforestation fronts, corre-
sponding with migratory processes, proceeding from the neighboring Brazilian States (Acre and Rondônia),
which are stimulated by the agriculture expansion and wood predatory exploration (Sanches et al. 2007).
Nevertheless, it was observed an increase in turbidity from upstream to downstream that would be explained
by the soil loss and sediments transport from all the contribution areas along the basin (Leonardo 2003). This
phenomenon also could be responsible for the slight decrease in dissolved oxygen in the same direction. Since
it would be expected a general decreasing trend for total suspended solids and turbidity, the observed opposite
trend for these two parameters, as well as the increasing trend for turbidity could be explained by possible
measurement inaccuracies of the turbidity meter used. The pH-value decreased from upstream to downstream
and the temperature shows a slight increase in the same direction (Fig. 3). This last trend could be due to the
entrance of acidic blackwater tributaries which may contribute to pH and temperature changes.

123
84 Int Aquat Res (2017) 9:81–88

Fig. 3 Average values and standard deviation (SD) of the water quality variables for each monitoring station of the ANA in the
Purus river (1998–2006)

Relations of the water quality with deforestation variables

Table 1 presents the accumulated total deforestation data for the years 2000–2006 and the deforestation rates
for the years 2001–2006, respectively.
The higher deforestation rates were observed in Boca do Acre and Lábrea, with larger total deforested areas
probably related with the access by road to the floodplain areas. The lower rates were observed in Pauini and
Beruri (Arumã) where the access to the floodplain forest by road is almost inexistent. No relation was found
among deforestation rates and the water quality parameters at the four sites. On the other hand, ATD showed

Table 1 Deforestation levels for the municipal districts of the study (PRODES 2007)
Year Boca do Acre Pauini Lábrea Beruri
ATD DR ATD DR ATD DR ATD DR

2000 1165.9 – 146.8 – 1245.1 – 181.4 –

2001 1216.2 50.3 154.7 7.9 1419.8 174.7 189.2 7.8
2002 1319.8 103.6 164.8 10.1 1625.9 206.1 191.7 2.5
2003 1570.6 250.8 177.5 12.7 2083.5 457.6 197.2 5.5
2004 1693.7 123.1 184.5 7.0 2449.5 366.0 200.2 3.0
2005 1747.3 53.6 193.5 9.0 2631.3 181.8 200.9 0.7
2006 1831.9 84.6 201.1 7.6 2910.5 279.2 203.3 2.4
– Not reported
ATD accumulated total deforestation (km2), DR deforestation rate (km2/year)

123
Int Aquat Res (2017) 9:81–88 85

Table 2 Correlation coefficient analysis among DR, ATD and water quality variables in the Purus river basin (2000–2006)
ATD 1 DR 1 ATD 2 DR 2 ATD 3 DR 3 ATD 4 DR 4

Temp1 0.403** 0.216**

pH 1 -0.883* 0.132**
E.C 1 -0.584** -0.326**
Turb 1 -0.417** -0.042**
D.O 1 0.441** 0.356**
TSS 1 -0.011** -0.364**
Temp 2 0.863* 0.035**
pH 2 -0.765* -0.382**
E.C 2 -0.107** -0.543**
Turb 2 -0.631** 0.071**
D.O 2 0.671** -0.219**
TSS 2 0.572** 0.322**
Temp 3 0.793* 0.174**
pH 3 -0.971* -0.430**
E.C 3 -0.433** -0.558**
Turb 3 -0.760* -0.124**
D.O 3 0.941* 0.388**
TSS 3 -0.159** 0.193**
Temp 4 0.511** -0.455**
pH 4 -0.828* 0.598**
E.C 4 -0.284** 0.680**
Turb 4 0.154** 0.399**
D.O 4 -0.259** 0.305**
TSS 4 0.848* -0.506**
1 Station 1, 2 Station 2; 3 Station 3, 4 Station 4, Temp temperature (°C), E.C electrical conductivity (lS cm-1), Turb turbidity
(NTU), D.O dissolved oxygen (mg l-1 O2), TSS total suspended solids (mg l-1), ATD accumulated total deforestation (km2), DR
deforestation rate (km2 year-1)
* Significant (P \ 0.05); ** non-significant (P [ 0.05)

relationships with water quality mainly in station 3 (Lábrea) where larger ATD values were observed. The
ATD values correlates with changes in temperature in stations 2 and 3, with total suspended solids in station 4,
with dissolved oxygen in station 3, with pH-value in all the four stations, and with turbidity in station 3
(Table 2). It is remarkable, the significant negative relationship between the ATD and pH-value, indicating
that increase in the ATD will contribute to decrease the water pH-value. Comparable pattern was already
obtained in other basins in USA, Brazil, Indonesia and India (Kunkle 1974; Neal et al. 1992; Arceivala and
Asolekar 2006; Hirano et al. 2007). Deforestation likely contributes to increase the concentration of nitrates
(nitrification) in the river water, and the increased hydrogen ions, released through increased nitrification,
cause the water pH-value decrease (Lampert and Sommer 1997; Arceivala and Asolekar 2006). Since
deforestation often causes the loss of soil carbon and a net release of CO2, the increasing deforestation
processes in some parts of the basin may also contribute to the intensification of carbon (CO2) release from
soils, with associated changes in content and composition of this gas on river water, which may result in
alterations on water pH-value (Mizuno and Mori 1970; Wissmar et al. 1981; Goudie 2000; Soulsby et al. 2002;
Hirano et al. 2007; Iyobe and Haraguchi 2008; Lal et al. 2015).

Land use changes

In the Purus river basin, as a whole, the highest percentage of the area is represented by forested land since it
covered 85.8% of the total area in 2007. However, this basin suffered a relative intense process of land use and
changes on the cover composition in the period 2003–2007. Forests were cleared to give way to expansion of

123
86 Int Aquat Res (2017) 9:81–88

Fig. 4 Comparison of land cover and use maps in the Purus river basin. a 2003 (Water Resources eAtlas 2003); b 2007 (modified
from Rı́os-Villamizar et al. 2011)

cattle ranching and farming lands on this basin. According to the spatial sequence displayed by the INPE data,
the deforestation rates are further increasing at the municipal districts located at south and southeast of the
Amazon region. In this sense, the larger deforested areas along the basin are concentrated close to urban areas
of the municipal districts of Rio Branco, Sena Madureira, Plácido de Castro and Senador Guiomard, in the

123
Int Aquat Res (2017) 9:81–88 87

Table 3 Land cover variables percents in the Purus river basin on 2003 and 2007
Land cover variables 2003 (%)a 2007 (%)b

Urban area 0.1 0.13

Deforested area 6.7c 5.48
Forest cover 91.0 85.83
Hydrography – 1.6
Wetlands (Várzea) 7.0 5.9
Aquatic macrophytes – 0.01
Secondary forest – 0.89
d
Other 0.23e
– Not reported
a
Water Resources eAtlas (2003) (Basin area: 371,042.0 km2)
b
Rı́os-Villamizar et al. (2011) (Basin area: 375,458.5 km2)
c
Percent loss of original forest cover
d
This category includes percent grassland, savanna and shrubland (3.9%), and percent cropland (3.9%)
e
This category includes cloudy area

Acre State; and Lábrea and Boca do Acre, in the Amazonas State (Fig. 4b). It is evident that the reduction of
forest cover was roughly 5.17% in the period 2003–2007 (Fig. 4; Table 3). Another important aspect of the
identified changes is that wetlands area lost approximately 1.1% in the same period, but this variation would
also be due to the effects of the flood pulse, during natural seasonal periods, on the rivers and lakes’ water
level (Junk et al. 1989; Junk and Wantzen 2004).

Conclusions

The analyzed waters of the Purus river basin showed typical characteristics of Amazonian natural waters. We
observed clear trends in changes of physico-chemical properties of water from upstream to downstream of the
Purus river such as decrease in pH-value, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, total suspended solids, and
increase in turbidity. Only the pH-value presented significant negative relationships with the ATD in all the
study sites, indicating that increase in the ATD will contribute to decrease the water pH-value. On the other
hand, the ATD values correlated positively and significantly with changes of temperature only in stations 2
and 3, indicating that increase in the ATD will contribute to increase the water temperature. The DR did not
present, in none of the study stations, any significant relation with the water quality parameters. Then, the
deforestation levels have not yet caused a large effect on the water quality, which is probably most influenced
by hydrological and climatic factors such as river discharge, river level, and pluvial precipitations, among
others; but this will be addressed in forthcoming papers.
It seems that the effects of deforestation on water quality are related not with the rate but with the total area
deforested, and they become apparent after a minimal size of deforested area is achieved.
Therefore, despite the good conservation status for most parts of the Purus river basin, impacts on water
quality caused by human activities are evident, especially close to urban areas, at a local scale. Since similar
attributes are common in other basins of the whitewater systems of the Brazilian Amazon, this may be seen as
a warning on the effects of deforestation on water quality in larger areas than those of our study sites. Actions
to control the deforestation in this basin would need to be taken to maintain its conservation status and, in view
of that, it would be necessary to implement a transboundary watershed management program for conservation
and preservation purposes, and this program could serve as a conservation model for Brazil and other
Amazonian countries.

Acknowledgements This work was funded by Brazilian National Scientific Council (CNPq), Tropical Forest Protection Program
(PPG-7), Grant Number 556899/2005-9. We thank the postgraduate Program of Environmental Sciences and Sustainability in the
Amazon (PPG/CASA/UFAM), the postgraduate Program in Climate and Environment at the National Institute of Amazonian
Research (INPA/UEA), the Ecology, Monitoring and Sustainable Use of Wetlands Group (MAUA/CDAM/INPA), CAPES/

123
88 Int Aquat Res (2017) 9:81–88

CNPq—IEL Nacional—Brasil, Programa de Apoio à Fixação de Doutores no Amazonas (FIXAM/AM) and Programa de Apoio à
Participação em Eventos Cientı́ficos e Tecnológicos (PAPE), from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas
(FAPEAM/SECTI/AM) for financial support. We also thank Kyara Martins Formiga by suggestions and elaboration of the study
area map.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if
changes were made.

References

APHA, AWWA and WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public
Health Association, Washington, D.C
Arceivala SJ, Asolekar SR (2006) Wastewater treatment for pollution control and reuse. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. New
Delhi. https://books.google.com.br/books?isbn=0070620997. Accessed 17 Nov 2016
Furch K, Junk WJ (1997) Physicochemical conditions in the floodplains. In: Junk WJ (ed) The central Amazon floodplain:
ecology of a pulsing system. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 69–108
Goudie A (2000) The human impact on the natural environment. MIT Press, Cambridge
HIDROWEB (2007) Hydrologic information system of the ANA. http://hidroweb.ana.gov.br/. Accessed 20 Jun 2007
Hirano T, Segah H, Harada T et al (2007) Carbon dioxide balance of a tropical peat swamp forest in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Glob
Change Biol 13:412–425
Iyobe T, Haraguchi A (2008) Ion flux from precipitation to peat soil in spruce forest–Sphagnum bog communities in the Ochiishi
district, eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Limnology 9:89–99
Junk WJ, Wantzen KM (2004) The flood pulse concept: new aspects, approaches, and applications—an update. In: Proceedings of
the 2nd international symposium on the management of large rivers for fisheries, Bangkok, Thailand, vol 2, pp 117–149
Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain-systems. Can Special Publ Fish Aquat Sci
106:110–127
Kunkle SH (1974) Water—its quality often depends the forester. Technical document Unasylva 105 FAO. http://www.fao.org/
docrep/e7730e/e7730e02.html. Accessed 27 Apr 2008
Lal R, Singh BR, Mwaseba DL, Kraybill D, Hansen D O, Eik LO (2015) Sustainable intensification to advance food security and
enhance climate resilience in Africa. Springer. Switzerland. https://books.google.com.br/books?isbn=9783319093604.
Accessed 18 Nov 2016
Lampert W, Sommer U (1997) Limnoecology: the ecology of lakes and streams. Oxford University Press, New York
Leonardo HCL (2003) Soil and water quality indicators to evaluate the sustainable use of the rio Passo Cue watershed in western
Paraná. Master Dissertation, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Mizuno T, Mori S (1970) Preliminary hydrobiological survey of some southeast asian inland waters. Biol J Linn Soc 2:77–117
Neal C, Forti MC, Jenkins A (1992) Towards modelling the impact of climate change and deforestation on stream water quality in
Amazonia: a perspective based on the MAGIC model. Sci Total Environ 127:225–241
PRODES (2007) Via satellite Brazilian Amazonian forest monitoring project—INPE deforestation database. http://www.dpi.inpe.
br/prodesdigital/prodesmunicipal.php. Accessed 25 Apr 2007
Rı́os-Villamizar EA, Junior AFM, Waichman AV (2011) Water physico-chemical characterization and soil use in the Purus river
basin, western Brazilian Amazon. Rev Geogr Acadêmica 5(2):54–65
Rı́os-Villamizar EA, Piedade MTF, Costa JG et al (2014) Chemistry of different Amazonian water types for river classification: a
preliminary review. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 178:17–28
Sanches MV, Assis FP, Bueno CR et al (2007) Environmental and sustainability analysis of the Amazonas State. United Nations
Publication, Santiago
Sioli H (1956) Über Natur und Mensch im brasilianischen Amazonasgebiet. Erdkunde 10(2):89–109
Soulsby C, Gibbins C, Wade AJ et al (2002) Water quality in the Scottish uplands: a hydrological perspective on catchment
hydrochemistry. Sci Total Environ 294:73–94
Water Resources eAtlas (2003) Watersheds of south America (SA01 Amazon, Purus). The world conservation union (IUCN),
IWMI, RAMSAR, WRI, pp 1–2
Wissmar RC, Richey JE, Stallard RF et al (1981) Plankton metabolism and carbon processes in the Amazon river, its tributaries
and floodplain waters, Peru-Brazil, May–June 1977. Ecology 62:1622–1633

123