Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
IN THE MATTER OF :
Versus
MEMO OF PARTIES :
Versus
Respondent :
1. Bihar State Information Commission,
Fourth Floor, Soochna Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna -
800021
&
2. Bihar Labour Resource Dept (Public Authority)
Income Tax circle, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Kidwaipuri, Patna,
Bihar 800001
&
3. Bihar Department of Industries, (Public Authority)
2nd Floor, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Jawaharlal Nehru
Marg, Patna, Bihar 800015
Page: 01
INDEX
_________________________________________________________________
Sl.S.No
No. PARTICULARS
PARTICULARS PAGES
PAGES
____________________________________________________________
1.1. Synopsis and List of Dates 2-3
1. Synopsis and List of Dates 2-3
2.2. Writ Petition alongwith Affidavit 4-9
in support
Page : 02
Page : 03
To,
Hon’ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship’s Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.
1. That the petitioner is filing the present writ petition in public interest. The petitioner has no
personal interest in the litigation and the petition is not guided by self-gain or for gain of any other
person / institution / body and that there is no motive other than of public interest in filing the
writ petition.
2. That the petitioner has based the instant writ petition from authentic information and documents
obtained from various governments departments/portals/RTI applications.
3. That the petition, if allowed, would benefit the citizens of this country generally as rule of law is
essential for democracy and such brazen violation of law by the respondents can be stopped by
the orders of this Hon’ble Court only.
Facts of Case:
4. Sir, The Petitioner Mr Ravi kumar having residential address- Dhoraiya, Banka, Bihar-813205, is a
social worker providing Common Facilitation to the local publics .
5. There are bundle of RTI Application and the Appeal application filled by the peoples throughout
this Facilitation Institution has never been respond by the concerned SPIO and the Appelleate
Authority .
6. The State Information Commission has also been notified or tried to reach to the commission
under support of the Central Information Commission , but nothing gone well
Question of Laws :
(a) Right to Personal Liberty Guaranteed by article 21 of Constitution (7), that any person who is deprived
of his fundamental rights shall be entitled directly to approach the Supreme Court for the
enforcement of such rights.
( Omesh Thapper V. State of Madras, A.I.R. 1950 S.C.124 (The Court declared: "... the
Supreme Court is constituted as the protector and guarantor of Fundamental
Rights")
Page : 04
Ground to admit the PIL:
8. A Case with the same subjected matter has already been admitted by the National Human Rights
Commission having case No- 1797/4/3/2019 dated 19/06/2019 under Section- SB-2.
10. Taking Publics Payments against every application submitted to the commission.
Prayer or relief :
1. Kindly take an disciplinary actions against each of the concerned SPIO designated under specified
public authority as it is described on SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES (Specimen enclosed)
2. Kindly Command the Commission to make furnish the Information from the concerned PIO to
each & every of the applications.
Signature of Applicant
Page : 05
Page: 06
Page : 07
Page : 08