Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036963?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Annual Reviews is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annual Review of Sociology.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2003. 29:115-33
doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100057
Copyright© 2003 by AnnualReviews. All rightsreserved
Firstpublishedonline as a Review in Advance on June4, 2003
THE SOCIOLOGY
OFTHESELF
PeterL.Callero
Departmentof Sociology, WesternOregonUniversity,Monmouth,Oregon97361;
email: Callerp@wou.edu
INTRODUCTION
AnthonyElliot (2001, p. 8)
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
116 CALLERO
CharlesLemert(1992, p. ix)
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
OFSELF
SOCIOLOGY 117
The individualis not the vis-a-vis of power;it is, I believe, one of its prime
effects.
MichaelFoucault(1994, p. 214)
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
118 CALLERO
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SOCIOLOGY
OFSELF 119
PROCESS
THE SELFAS REFLEXIVE
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
120 CALLERO
Yet,despitethe earlypoliticalconcernsthatmotivatedMeadandotherProgres-
sive erapragmatists(Shalin 1988), the symbolicinteractionisttraditionhas, for the
most part,failed to develop a sophisticatedconceptualunderstandingof the self in
which relationsof power arepresumedto be constitutive.A recentadvancein this
directioncan be foundin the workof Callero(2003), who mergeselementsof crit-
ical theoryand symbolic interactionismin the conceptualizationof a political self.
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SOCIOLOGY
OFSELF 121
For manyconstructioniststhe hope has been to build from the existing rubble
in new andmore promisingdirections.The postmodernargumentsareindeed
significant,but serve not as an end but a beginning.
KennethJ. Gergen(1999, p. 30)
It has become common in reviews of the sociological self to arguethatthe self is
both a social productand a social force (Rosenberg1981). In the firstinstance,the
self is examinedas a bounded,structuredobject-Mead's "me"-whereas in the
second instance,the self is examinedas a fluid, agentic, and creativeresponse-
Mead's "I."The distinctioncapturesthe core principleof a socially constructed
self, namelythatthe self is ajoint accomplishment,neithercompletelydetermined
by the social world nor pregivenat birth.
Following Cooley and Mead, most researchin the symbolic interactionisttra-
dition has focused on self-understandings,self-meanings,and self-conceptsas the
social productsof interest. The emphasis has in other words been on the social
productionof the personal self. Yet the social constructionof selfhood is also
about the meanings and understandingsassociated with the public self, the self
that is visible and known to othersand encompassedby what we come to accept
within the culturalcategory of personhood.Cahill (1998) recognizes this bias in
the literatureand makes a compellingcase for a "sociology of the person."(Cahill
offers a conceptualdistinctionbetween person, self, and individualthatis helpful
but unlikely to overcome the momentumof currentusage. I use the term public
self in place of Cahill'sperson.)Drawingon the work of Durkheim,Goffman,and
Foucaulthe proposes a frameworkfor understandingthe collectively instituted
conceptionsof the public self, the meansby which these conceptionsareproduced
and the disciplinarytechniquesof powerthataredeployed in the process.Cahill's
work offers an importantcorrectiveto approachesto social constructionismthat
tend to psychologize the subject.As he notes, "the public person is not made in
the image of a unique self; rather,an interpretivepictureof a unique self is made
in the image of the public person"(Cahill 1998, p. 131).
This suggests thata full understandingof self-meanings,self-images, and self-
conceptsrequiresa broadconceptualizationof context,one thatextendsbeyondthe
immediatedefinitionof the situationto include the historicaland culturalsettings
where unarticulatedassumptionsaboutthe natureof the personhave their origin.
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
122 CALLERO
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SOCIOLOGY
OFSELF 123
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
124 CALLERO
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SOCIOLOGY
OFSELF 125
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
126 CALLERO
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
OFSELF
SOCIOLOGY 127
Products of Self-Construction
In the fourthedition of the two-volumeHandbookof Social Psychology (Gilbert
et al. 1998) thereis, for the firsttime, a separatechapter(Baumeister1998) devoted
exclusively to the self--covering 60 pages and containing over 300 references.
Clearlythe explosion of interestin the self so evidentin the humanitiesand social
sciences is also occurringin psychology.Althoughpsychologistsaremoving away
fromanemphasison biologicallybaseddispositionstowarda moresocial model of
the individual(e.g., Walsh& Banaji 1997), they arestill muchmorelikely to focus
on individual"productsof self construction."By thisI meanthe qualitiesof the self
observedat the level of the subjectandconceptualizedas a variablein the explana-
tion of individualbehavior.For example, Baumeister's(1998) review of the field
contains discussions of self-enhancement,self-deception, self-monitoring,self-
efficacy, self-regulation, self-handicapping,self-presentation,self-guides, self-
verification,self-knowledge, self-control, and self-image. As these productsof
the self-constructionprocesscome to be employedas predictorsof behavior,there
is a tendency to focus on stability,unity, and conformity and de-emphasizethe
sociological principlesof social construction.The self thatis socially constructed
may congeal arounda relativelystable set of culturalmeanings,but these mean-
ings can never be permanentor unchanging.Similarly,the self that is socially
constructedmay appearcentered,unified,and singular,butthis symbolic structure
will be as multidimensionaland diverse as the social relationshipsthat surround
it. Finally, the self that is socially constructedis never a bounded quality of the
individualor a simpleexpressionof psychologicalcharacteristics;it is a fundamen-
tally social phenomenon,where concepts, images, and understandingsare deeply
determinedby relationsof power.Wherethese principlesare ignoredor rejected,
the self is often conceptualizedas a vessel for storing all the particularsof the
person.
Takethe case, for example, of self-esteem. When the concept of self-esteem
enteredpopularcultureit was loosened from its sociological and scientificmoor-
ings to become the "entrepreneurial" object of educators,parentingexperts,pop
psychologists, managementgurus, hip televangelists, and personalpower huck-
sters. Hewitt's(1998) aptlytitledbook TheMythof Self-Esteemserves as a timely
sociological reminderthatproductsof self-construction,such as self-esteem,often
serve as conceptualresourcesfor an entire culture.In a mannerconsistent with
Giddens'(1991) notionof a "doublehermeneutic,"we see in self-esteema concept
thatbegins to shape the very behaviorit was designed to explain.
Recognizing self-esteem as a culturalartifactdoes not necessarily mean it is
irrelevantto sociological analysis. I agree with Hewitt that the self, defined in
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
128 CALLERO
terms of reflexivity (the capacity to reflect on one's actions, thoughts, and feel-
ings), is a universalhumanexperiencethatserves as a phenomenalbase. Products
of social constructionare built on top of the psychic and corporalexperience of
reflexivity.Self-esteem is best understoodin this context as a named emotion or
mood that has been elaboratedwith diverse culturalmeanings and uses. Under-
standingthe historical,political,andculturaldevelopmentof the namingprocesses
is an importantsociological task, one that should extend to otherproductsof the
self.
Recent attemptsto move the study of self-esteem in a more sociological direc-
tion can be found in studies of the relationshipbetween self-esteem and identity
theory (Ervin & Stryker2001, Cast & Burke 2002), the use of cultural narra-
tives (Statham& Rhoades 2001), and beliefs regardingsocial inequality (Hunt
2001).
CONCLUSION
[T]he postmodernists'most pessimistic view of the demise of the self has not
been born out; rather,the core self has adaptedto contemporaryconditions
and thrived.
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
OFSELF
SOCIOLOGY 129
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thanksto ViktorGecas andMichael Schwalbefor helpfulcommentson an earlier
draftof the manuscript.
CITED
LITERATURE
Adler PA, Adler P. 1999. Transienceand the Crib, ed. K Nelson, pp. 73-97. Cambridge,
postmodernself: the geographicmobility of Mass: HarvardUniv. Press
resortworkers.Sociol. Q. 40:31-58 BurkePJ, CastAD. 1997. Stabilityand change
Altheide DL. 2000. Identityand the definition in the genderidentitiesof newly marriedcou-
of the situationin a mass-mediatedcontext. ples. Soc. Psychol. Q. 60:277-90
Symb.Interact.23:1-27 BurkePJ, Owens TJ, Serpe R, Thoits PA, eds.
Antonio RJ, KellnerD. 1994. The futureof so- 2003. Advances in IdentityTheoryand Re-
cial theory andthe limits of postmoderncri- search. New York:Kluwer-PlenumPress
tique. In Postmodernismand Social Inquiry, Butler J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism
eds. DR Dickens, A Fontana, pp. 127-52. and the Subversionof Identity. New York:
New York:GuilfordPress Routledge
Arnett JJ. 2002. The psychology of globaliza- CahillSE. 1998. Towarda sociology of the per-
tion. Am. Psychol. 57:774-83 son. Sociol. Theory16:131-48
BarberBR. 1996.Jihadvs. McWorld:How Glo- Callero PL. 1995. Role as resourcein a prison
balism and Tribalism are Reshaping the uprising. In Advances in Group Processes,
World.New York:BallantineBooks ed. B Markovsky,K Heimer,J O'Brien, pp.
BaudrillardJ. 1983. Simulations. New York: 221-47. Greenwich,Conn.:JAIPress
Semiotext(e) CalleroPL. 2003. The political self: identityre-
BaumeisterRF. 1998.The self. See Gilbertet al. sources for radical democracy.In Advances
1998, pp. 680-740 in Identity Theory and Research, ed. PJ
Beck U, Beck-GernsheimE. 2002. Individual- Burke,TJ Owens, R Serpe, PA Thoits. New
ization: InstitutionalizedIndividualismand York:Kluwer-PlenumPress. In press
its Social and Political Consequences.Lon- Cast AD, Burke PJ. 2002. A theory of self-
don, UK: Sage esteem. Soc. Forces 80:1041-68
Bellah RN, MadsenR, Sullivan WM, Swidler CastAD, StetsJE,BurkePJ. 1999. Does the self
A, Tipton SM. 1985. Habits of the Heart. conformto the views of others?Soc. Psychol.
Berkeley,CA: Univ. Calif. Press Q. 62:68-82
Best S. 1994. Foucault,postmodernism,andso- CeruloKA. 1997. Identityconstruction:new is-
cial theory.In Postmodernismand Social In- sues, new directions.Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23:
quiry, eds. DR Dickens, A Fontana,pp. 25- 385-409
52. New York:GuilfordPress Collier PJ. 2000. The effects of completing a
Bruner J. 1997. The narrativemodel of self- capstone course on studentidentity. Sociol.
construction. In The Self Across Psychol- Educ. 73:285-99
ogy: Self-Recognition,Self-Awareness,and Collier PJ. 2001. The differentiatedmodel of
the Self Concept, eds. JG Snodgrass, RL role identity acquisition.Symb.Interact.24:
Thompson,pp. 145-61. New York:Ann. NY 217-35
Acad. Sci. CraneD. 2000. Fashionand Its Social Agenda:
BrunerJ, LucarielloJ. 1989. Monologueas nar- Class, Gender, and Identity in Clothing.
rative of the world. In Narrativesfrom the Chicago:Univ. Chicago Press
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
130 CALLERO
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SOCIOLOGYOF SELF 131
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
132 CALLERO
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
SOCIOLOGYOF SELF 133
This content downloaded from 202.92.131.34 on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:21:19 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions