Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

Under Water observations – Multi Purpose Berth (MPB) - (Chainage 500m to 730m)

Date & time of 0bservations – 04-03-2019 & 10.30 am


Deck Slab to top of Water level – 3.00 m
Total Depth of Water – 16.50 m
Distance between joints in Diaphragm wall – 4.00 m

 Testing was started from 500 m

Chainage 500m - 510 m

 Diaphragm wall joint 150mm to 200mm Gaps was noticed entire height of wall
below the water level.
 Exposure of the rebar was noticed in 3m x 4m area of the Diaphragm wall

Chainage 510m - 520m

 Diaphragm wall joint 100mm Gaps was noticed entire height of wall below the
water level.
 Distress was noticed in joints as well as exposure of the rebar was noticed in 5m x
3m area of the Diaphragm wall

Chainage 520m - 530m

 Distress/damage was noticed in 1m x 4m area of the Diaphragm wall


 Exposure of the rebar was noticed in 3m x 4m area of the Diaphragm wall joint
portions.

Chainage 530m - 540m

 Diaphragm wall joint 100mm to 200mm Gaps was noticed entire height of wall
below the water level.
 Exposure of the rebar (5 rods) was noticed in 1m x 2.5m area of the Diaphragm
wall joint portions.
 Exposure of the rebar was noticed in 5m x 2m area of the Diaphragm wall

Chainage 540m - 550m

 Diaphragm wall joint 100mm Gaps was noticed entire height of wall below the
water level.

Chainage 550m - 560m

 Diaphragm wall joint 100mm Gaps was noticed entire height of wall below the
water level.

Chainage 560m - 570m

1
 Joint 75mm to 100mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level
 Exposure of the rebar was noticed in 1.5m x 3m area of the Diaphragm wall
 Joint 75mm to 100mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level

Chainage 570m - 580m

 Joint 150mm to 200mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level
 Joint 100mm to 150mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level
 Exposure of the rebar was noticed in Diaphragm wall joint portions and 300mm
Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall joint below the water level
 Exposure of the rebar was noticed in 600mm width and entire height of the
Diaphragm wall

Chainage 580m - 590m

 Joint 100mm to 150mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level and 300mm gaps noticed 2m height from bottom
 Joint 100mm to 150mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level

Chainage 580m - 590m

 Joint 300mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water level
 Joint 75mm to 100mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level
 Joint 100mm to 150mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level

Date & time of 0bservations – 11-03-2019 & 4.45 pm


Deck Slab to top of Water level – 3.00 m
Total Depth of Water – 16.50 m

Chainage 680m - 690m

 Distress/damage and exposure of the rebar was noticed in 200 mm width 3m


height of the Diaphragm wall
 Distress/damage and exposure of the rebar was noticed in 1 m width 3m height of
the Diaphragm wall
 Crack was noticed in the Diaphragm wall area of 500mm width and 2 m height.

Chainage 690m - 700m

 Distress/damage and exposure of the rebar was noticed in 1m width 1m height of


the Diaphragm wall

2
 Joint 100mm to 150mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level
 Distress was in the Diaphragm wall 3 m x 3 m area
 Distress was noticed in the Diaphragm wall 1.5 m x 2 m area
 Joint 150mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water level

Chainage 700m - 710m

 Joint 100mm to 150mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level
 Distress was noticed in the Diaphragm wall area 300 mm x 300 mm wall open was
noticed
 Distress/damage and exposure of the rebar was noticed in 1.5 m width 1.5 m
height of the Diaphragm wall

Chainage 710m - 720m

 Distress/damage and exposure of the rebar was noticed in 1.5 m width 1 m height
of the Diaphragm wall
 Distress was noticed in Diaphragm wall size of 1 m x 1 m.
 Joint 100mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water level

Chainage 720m - 730m

 Joint 75mm to 100mm Gaps was noticed in the Diaphragm wall below the water
level
 Distress was noticed in Diaphragm wall size of 1.5 m x 1 m.
 Distress/damage and exposure of the rebar (12 rods) was noticed in 2 m width 1.5
m height of the Diaphragm wall

S-ar putea să vă placă și