Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
__________________________________________________________________________________
SUBMITTED BY
SAUMYA GIRI
1 | Indian Cinema
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Saumya Giri
INDEX
1. Introduction 3
2. Overview 6
2.1 Indian art cinema 10
2.2 Indian commercial cinema 11
2.3 regional cinema of india 12
6. conclusion 25
1. Introduction
world about the vibrant film industry in India and foreigners with stars
in their eyes landed upon Bombay shores. One of these was Mary
Evans, a young Australian girl who could do stunts. She could, with no
effort, lift a man and throw him across the room. She wore Zorro-like
masks and used a whip when necessary. She changed her name to
Nadia and was affectionately known by the audience as Fearless Nadia
and that name stuck with her through the ages. Even though she did not
speak any of the native tongues, her career spanned from the 1930’s to
1959. She had a huge cult following. The press and critics did not
appreciate her; however, the audiences could not get enough of her
stunt theatrics. Following on Nadia’s heels in 1940, Florence Esekiel,
a teenager from Baghdad, arrived in Bombay and was soon given the
screen name of Nadira. She played the love interest in a Dilip Kumar
film who at the time was a leading heartthrob. She moved on to playing
bitchy parts and was forever type cast as a ‘vamp’ – the temptress, the
bad girl. She gradually slipped into mother roles. One of her last
appearances was in Ismail Merchant Film Cotton Mary. There were
also notable male actors who made a mark on the screen. One of them
was Bob Christo, who was another Australian. He came to India
because he had seen a picture of the actress Parveen Babi and ended up
actually being in a film with her. He specialized in villain and
henchman roles. Another notable actor is Tom Alter who has played
the foreigner who does not speak the language, although he is fluent in
Hindi and Urdu, even reciting poems in Urdu on the stage. He was
raised in Mussourie, India. And then we must not forget Helen. A
Franco-Burmese refuge who broke all norms, she embodied sexuality
and filled the roles that other actresses with conservative views
shunned. She was widely sought after for her dance or ‘item numbers’
as they are called today. However, she stayed within the code of
decency wearing body stockings all the times. She did venture out of
this zone by doing a few serious roles. In the 1920’s Franz Austen, a
German from Munich who could not utter one word of Hindi, came to
Bombay and directed 57 blockbuster films. His films were on the scale
of those made by Cecil B. DeMille. He drew his inspiration from
episodes of the Mahabharata and Ramayana, his early silent films were
richer than most that were made at the time. In 1947, When India gained
its independence, mythological and historical stories were being
replaced by social reformist films focusing on the lives of the lower
classes, the dowry system and prostitution. This brought a new wave of
filmmakers to the forefront such as Bimal Roy and Satyajit Ray among
others. In the 1960’s, inspired by social and cinematic changes in the
US and Europe, India’s new wave was founded, offering a greater sense
of realism to the public and getting recognition abroad, but the industry
at large churned out ‘masala’ films with a mesh of genres including
action, comedy, melodrama punctuated with songs and dances and
relying on the songs and the stars to sell their films. Today there is a
growing movement to make Indian cinema more real - a group of young
filmmakers like Anurag Kashyap, Anand Gandhi, and Gyan Correa,
whose film The Good Road is this year’s contender for the Oscars.
There are now more large investments from corporate houses and a
more structured industry funding independent cinema and making it a
viable and profitable business. There has never been a more favorable
time for Indian cinema than today. With a vibrant creative community,
new technology and investment interest, we are on the verge of seeing
Indian cinema transcend its national borders to project India’s socio-
political and economic influence around the world.
2. Overview
India has one of the oldest and largest film industries in the world. It
was in early 1913 that an Indian film received a public screening. The
film was Raja Harischandra. Its director, Dadasaheb Phalke is now
remembered through a life-time achievement award bestowed by the
film industry in his name. At that point of time it was really hard to
arrange somebody to portray the role of females. Among the middle
classes, that association of acting with the loss of virtue, female
modesty, and respectability has only recently been put into question.
the studio system began to emerge in the early 1930s. Its most
successful early film was Devdas (1935), whose director, P.C. Barua
also appeared in the lead role. The Prabhat Film Company, established
by V. G. Damle, Shantaram, S. Fatehlal, and two other men in 1929,
also achieved its first success around this time. Damle and Fatehlal's
Sant Tukaram (1936), made in Marathi was the first Indian film to gain
international recognition.
The social films of V. Shantaram, more than anything else, paved the
way for an entire set of directors who took it upon themselves to
interrogate not only the institutions of marriage, dowry, and
widowhood, but the grave inequities created by caste and class
distinctions. Some of the social problems received their most
unequivocal expression in Achhut Kanya ("Untouchable Girl", 1936),
a film directed by Himanshu Rai of Bombay Talkies. The film portrays
the travails of a Harijan girl, played by Devika Rani, and a Brahmin
boy, played by Ashok Kumar.
Awaara (The Vagabond, 1951), Shri 420 (1955), and Jagte Raho (1957)
were both commercial and critical successes. Bimal Roy's Do Bigha
Zamin, which shows the influence of Italian neo-realism, explored the
hard life of the rural peasantry under the harshest conditions. In the
meantime, the Hindi cinema had seen the rise of its first acknowledged
genius, Guru Dutt, whose films critiqued the conventions of society and
deplored the conditions which induce artists to relinquish their
inspiration. From Barua's Devdas (1935) to Guru Dutt's Sahib, Bibi aur
India is home to one of the largest film industries in the world. Every
year thousands of movies are produced in India. Indian film industry
comprises of Hindi films, regional movies and art cinema. The Indian
film industry is supported mainly by a vast film-going Indian public,
though Indian films have been gaining increasing popularity in the rest
of the world, especially in countries with large numbers of emigrant
Indians.
The directors of the art cinema owed much more to foreign influences,
such as Italian Neo-Realism or French New Wave, than they did to the
genre conventions of commercial Indian cinema. The best known New
Cinema directors were Bimal Roy, Ritwik Ghatak, and Satyajit Ray.
The best-known films of this genre are the Apu Trilogy (Bengali) by
Satyajit Ray and Do Bigha Zameen (Hindi) by Bimal Roy. Satyajit Ray
was the most flourishing of the "art cinema" directors. His films played
primarily to art-house audiences in the larger Indian cities, or to film
buffs on the international circuit.
A new trend began in the 1970s when the producers and audience
became the decision makers as far as the form and content of escapist
The three important centres where Indian cinema had its early growth
were Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai, which were the principal trading
port cities of the Imperial British in India. As we have seen, Hindi films
made in Bombay found good market across the country and became the
most dominant form of film production. But Telegu cinema in Chennai,
Bengali cinema in Kolkata and Marathi cinema in Mumbai also
flourished producing its own brand of popular entertainment.
Just as Hindi cinema is categorized into mainstream and parallel
cinema, similarly the regional cinema also developed its own
mainstream and parallel cinema. The mainstream regional cinema
developed its own formulas for success depending on the demands of
its audiences and at the same time produced individual film makers
who wished to depart from main stream formula films towards the
With the release of Pather Panchali in 1955, Bengali cinema saw the
advent of parallel cinema, and along with Ray, Mrinal Sen and Ritwik
Ghatak became internationally known directors with their socially
relevant cinema that inspired a whole generation of film makers across
the country and the world.
In the eastern part of the country, Assamese and Oriya films also carved
out regional markets. In Assam as far back as 1935, Jyoti Prasad
Agarwal directed the first Assamese film Joymati. Later, in 1987
director Jahnu Barua gave the Assamese film national and international
recognition with his film Haladhiya Charaye Baodhan Khaay. This
film won awards at the Locarno film festival. The late Bhupen
Hazarika, a renowned singer, composer from Assam is credited with
having provided excellent and unique musical scores to not only many
Assamese films but also Bengali and Hindi films.
Mohan Sunder Deb Goswami made the first Oriya talkie Sita Bibaha in
1936. In 1960 the Oriya film Sri Lokenath directed by Prafulla
Sengupta received a national award. Prasanta Nanda is recognized as a
great Oriya actor, director and screenplay writer and has received a
number of national awards. In recent times, Biswaprakash (aka ‘The
Young Rebel’) directed by Susanta Misra won a national award in
2000.
Down south, Tamil, Telegu and Malayalam and Kannada films are
extremely popular with the masses in their respective regions. Tamil
cinema has a long history and began in the 1897 when M. Edwards
screened a film at Victoria Memorial Hall in Chennai. Tamil cinema
beagn with mythologicals like Keechaka Vadham (1916)
and Draupadi Vastrapaharanam (1918) by Nataraja Mudaliar. In
1931, Kalidas was the first Tamil talkie. Just before independence,
Gemini studios produced some great films including the
famous Chandralekha. One of the unique features of Tamil cinema is
6. Conclusion
Political influences (see the next point) led the Indian film industry —
which is not to say filmmakers themselves — to evolve in direct but
discrete parallel to their Western counterparts: The Golden Age of
production was roughly concurrent with the various New Waves in
Europe, the rise of blockbusters in the 1970s coincided with the time
they took off in America, and so on. Increasingly in the 21st century,
there’s been a tendency, particularly in Bollywood, to emulate
American and European films (shortening running times,
cutting musical numbers, etc.), though this has yet to carry over to the
regional cinemas, which still proudly flaunt their idiosyncrasies.
A great deal of the creative isolation of early Indian cinema, and the
development of its own set of rules largely separate from those of the
other world cinemas, dates back to regulations the British government
established to promote British films over American ones (in the days
when Britain ruled India). After winning political independence from
Great Britain in 1947, the national film industries, already aesthetically
independent, remained that way.
Not all Indian films are masala films, but masala films are uniquely
Indian. Masala films are the cinematic equivalent of the melange of
spices used in Indian cooking that provide the name. Every conceivable
genre is thrown into the pot — meaning the screenplay — and cooked
up by the director. It makes perfect sense: In making a movie for the
whole family to see, what Hollywood calls a four-quadrant blockbuster,
why not throw every existing film genre into the mix?
Ironically, a lot of Western film lovers have an easier time with Indian
arthouse and indie fare, both of which are known as “parallel cinema”
in India. (That’s an ironic title given the parallel evolution of the
American and Indian film industries.) These titles favor
naturalistic/realistic approaches. Some filmmakers known as parallel
cinema filmmakers will employ elements of pop cinema, like songs and
movie stars. One such example is Mani Ratnam’s 1998 film “Dil Se,”
which starred Shahrukh Khan, and blended serious political
commentary with a lyrical romantic tragedy.
The most famous name in this movement is the great Bengali auteur
Satyajit Ray, one of the most celebrated filmmakers in the world, let
alone south Asia. The height of Ray’s career coincides, by no accident,
with the Golden Age of Indian cinema, stretching roughly from
independence until the 1960s. Indian art cinema today often recalls
American “Indiewood” films of the late 1990s and early-to-mid-2000s:
a hybrid of arthouse and pop, backed by the industry itself but
maintaining distance from mass-market blockbusters. Like their
American counterparts, some are better than others, with the best quite
good and the worst not very.
In too many mainstream Hindi films to count, the big tough hero who
can throw cars with his mustache and is master of all that he surveys
comes home to find his mother yelling at him about his lack of