Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Table of contents
Table of contents........................................................................................................................ i
Acknowledgement ..................................................................................................................... i
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... ii
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1
Chapter-I ................................................................................................................................... 2
1. Wind load analysis and design.............................................................................................. 2
1.1 Roof analysis and design ................................................................................................ 2
a) Roof1 ............................................................................................................................ 3
1.20 Wind pressure ............................................................................................................... 4
1.2.1 External wind pressure............................................................................................. 4
1.2.2 Internal wind pressures ........................................................................................... 6
b) Roof – 2 ........................................................................................................................ 8
Wind pressure ................................................................................................................... 8
1.3 Transfer of wind loads to purlins .................................................................................. 10
1.3.1 Load combinations................................................................................................. 10
1.4 Design of purlin ............................................................................................................ 12
1.4.1 Design actions ........................................................................................................ 12
1.4.2 Sectional properties................................................................................................ 12
A. check for deflection.................................................................................................... 12
B. check for deflection.................................................................................................... 13
C. check for shear ........................................................................................................... 13
D. check for bearing (compression perpendicular to grain) ........................................... 13
E. check for lateral deflection ......................................................................................... 14
1.5 Truss analysis and design.............................................................................................. 14
1.5.1 Loading .................................................................................................................. 14
A. Reaction forces........................................................................................................... 14
B. self weight .................................................................................................................. 14
1.5.2 Truss analysis......................................................................................................... 16
1.5.3 Analysis results ...................................................................................................... 17
1.6 Design of truss members............................................................................................... 18
A. rafter ........................................................................................................................... 18
B. horizontal chord.......................................................................................................... 18
C. Vertical members ....................................................................................................... 18
1.7 Wind load on flat slabs ................................................................................................. 19
1.7.1Flat slab for G+1 floor ............................................................................................ 19
wind pressure .................................................................................................................. 19
1.7.2 Flat slab @ +25.7 level .......................................................................................... 20
Chapter-2................................................................................................................................. 22
2.1 Slab analysis and design ................................................................................................... 22
1. Depth for deflection ........................................................................................................ 22
2. Loading ........................................................................................................................... 22
3. Analysis........................................................................................................................... 22
4. Moment Adjustments...................................................................................................... 23
4.1 support adjustment .................................................................................................... 23
4.2 span adjustment......................................................................................................... 23
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 i
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
5. Load transfer to frames ................................................................................................... 23
1. Mezzanine@3.00m ......................................................................................................... 24
2.0 Mezzanine@3.60 .......................................................................................................... 28
3. First floor slab ................................................................................................................. 33
4.0 Second floor slab........................................................................................................... 42
5.0 Third, fourth, and fifth floor slabs ................................................................................ 48
6.0 6th floor level................................................................................................................ 54
7.0 slab around the lift shaft -one way slab ........................................................................ 60
9.Flat roof for the stair case cover ...................................................................................... 61
10 Reinforcement bars for the slabs.................................................................................... 62
11.0 Bar cutoff and bar splices (slabs)................................................................................ 67
12.0 Lap length ................................................................................................................... 67
2.2 Stair case analysis and design ....................................................................................... 69
A. stair 1.......................................................................................................................... 69
B. stair 2 .......................................................................................................................... 69
C. stair 3 .......................................................................................................................... 70
Chapter 3................................................................................................................................. 74
Earth quake analysis ............................................................................................................... 74
3.1 Determination of design earth quake force ................................................................... 74
3.2 Calculations center of mass and center of stiffness ...................................................... 75
3.2.1 Roof level............................................................................................................... 75
3.2.2 6th floor level.......................................................................................................... 76
3.2.3 2nd , 3rd ,4th & 5th floor levels ................................................................................ 79
3.2.4 First floor level....................................................................................................... 82
3.2.5 Mezzanine levels................................................................................................... 86
3.2.6 Ground floor level................................................................................................ 89
3.2.7 Foundation ............................................................................................................. 91
3.3 Determination of the center of mass ............................................................................ 92
3.4 Distribution of base shear over height of a building..................................................... 93
3.5 Determination of the center of stiffness........................................................................ 93
3.5.1 Determination of D-values of frames .................................................................... 93
3.6 Computation of direct shear forces, Qi ....................................................................... 119
3.7 Shear correction factors for torsion........................................................................... 123
3.8 Final total lateral forces .............................................................................................. 127
3.9 the Later loads............................................................................................................. 129
Chapter 4............................................................................................................................... 141
Beam and column analysis and design ................................................................................. 141
4.1 Beam design and analysis for flexure ......................................................................... 141
4.1.1 Design information .............................................................................................. 141
4.1.2 Depth for deflection ............................................................................................. 142
4.1.3 Checking the section for flexure using design chart ............................................ 142
4.2 Design of beams for shear and torsion........................................................................ 151
4.2.1 Shear design ......................................................................................................... 151
4.2.2 Torsion design...................................................................................................... 151
4.2.3 Combined actions................................................................................................. 152
4.3. Shear and torsion reinforcement ................................................................................ 153
4.3.1 Shear reinforcement ............................................................................................. 154
4.3.2 Torsion ................................................................................................................. 159
4.3.1 Shear reinforcement ............................................................................................. 165
Acknowledgement
First, we would like to express our heartfelt thanks and gratitude to our advisor
Ato Yonas Teklehaimanot (Msc.) for he gave us fundamental project work on the
structural design of a G+six building. We also want to thank him for his dedication
and time devotion on guiding us how to proceed and for his uninterrupted advice during
the progress of the project work. Our work could have been in vain in his absence.
We have also grasped a good exposure of the practical world during the course of his
advice.
We are also thankful to Mohammed Abdela and Girum Yimer for their
willingness to give us their office where we did our project.
Finally, we are indebted to the department of civil engineering on providing us the
necessary materials and computer rooms to accomplish our project in advance and
properly.
Abstract
This project deals about the structural analysis and design of a G+6 building considering all
the external and external effects according to EBCS, 1995. It has five chapters and the
contents and the duties accomplished in each chapter is explained below.
The first chapter deals about the wind load analysis and design on roofs and flat slabs. The
external wind pressure coming from different directions were collected and transferred to
frames according to EBCS, 1995.We divided the roof of the building into two parts and each
of its truss members made of timber were designed as elopements resisting axial forces.
The second chapter focuses on the analysis and design of slabs and staircases. All the slabs
are solids and two-way slabs. The depths of all the slabs are made the same for construction
simplicity and reinforcement of each is determined using EBCS2, 1995.
The third chapter is about the calculation of lateral forces particularly earthquakes loads.
The weight of the building was computed by considering all elements from small to large.
The centre of mass and centre of stiffness were computed by assuming preliminary sections.
Finally, by accounting the tensional effects, the lateral forces were distributed to each floor
and subsequently to frame joints according to their stiffness.
The fourth chapter deals on the analysis and design of the frame of the structure. It was
analyzed using SAP2000 as space frame taking five combinations for the existing lateral and
vertical loads. Therefore, the beams and columns were designed using the loads obtained
from analysis by taking the worst effect.
Finally, the last chapter focuses on foundation design of the structure. We took the design
bearing capacity of the weathered rock from EBCS-7 recommended for different soils and
rocks. It was designed as square footing by considering two worst load combinations to
support and safely distribute all the actions coming from the super structure.
INTRODUCTION
Building structures are solids, which are composed of architectural and structural parts. The
structural part of the building supports the body of the building preventing it from any
collapse or failure. Therefore, structural design involves the determination of the different
sections of the skeletal part of the building to make it stable and sustainable through out its
design life.
A structural design is executed in such a way that the building will remain fit with
appropriate degrees of reliability and in an economic way. It should sustain all the actions
and influences during execution and use. Therefore, structural design focuses on structural
safety and serviceability with due durability. It must also optimize the cost expended in
building the structure and maintenance.
This structural design is executed based on the Ethiopian Building Code of Practice (EBCS)
prepared in 1995 E.C. This code follows the Limit State design approach. Limit state is a
state beyond which the structure no longer satisfies the design performance requirements. It
consists of two states namely Ultimate Limit and serviceability Limit states. Ultimate Limit
states are conditions related with collapse or states prior to structural failure. Its main concern
is the safety of structure and people. Serviceability Limit states are those associated to
conditions beyond which a structure does not accomplish specified service requirements. It is
mainly concerned about the function of construction works, comfort of people, and
appearance.
The prime objective of design is structural safety and serviceability. Incase the structure fails,
it must be in such a way it will minimize risks and casualty. It must extend the time for
evacuation of people inside a building. This requirement of structural design is accomplished
by the principle called ductility. Ductility allows yielding of steel reinforcement prior to the
collapse of the building. Yielding of steel bars warns the start of failure of a structure or its
part. Therefore, structures are designed to be under reinforced by certain percent to assure
ductility mode of failure if it happens.
This G+6 building is located in Mekelle city around Hawelti. The soil type is weathered rock
limestone. The building compartments consist of banks, restaurants, offices etc. Therefore, it
is designed according to EBCS 1 to 8, 1995 to fulfill the required functions and service of its
parts.
This structure is designed for 50 years design lifetime. Prior to designed, the structure was
analyzed as space frame using SAP2000 to collect all the actions for each structure. Finally,
the structural members such as roof, stairs, beams, columns, footings are designed using limit
state design approach stated in EBCS published in 1995.
Chapter-I
1. Wind load analysis and design
Wind as a moving air has an effect on effect on building structures. We use the knowledge of
fluid mechanics to understand the effect of wind on building structures. Wind actions
fluctuate with time, hence its effect on different situations and structures should be carefully
analyzed.
Wind act directly on the external surfaces of enclosed structures, through porosity of the
external surface, internal surface through opening. Wind pressure act on areas of the surfaces
producing forces perpendicular to the surface of the structure or on individual cladding
components.
The effect of wind on structures is significant on light and dynamic structures. It does have
considerable effect on vertically standing walls, columns and beams etc. there fore; its effect
can be easily studied on roof structures such as truss structures and flat slabs. Therefore, our
analysis on wind load actions and its design will focus on roofs analysis and design and
calculation of wind forces on flat slabs.
Method of analysis
There are two methods for wind load analysis, namely, the quasi-static method and detailed
dynamic analysis. The former is applied to structures whose structural properties do not make
them susceptible to dynamic exaltation. The latter is applied to structures which are likely to
be susceptible to dynamic excitation.
The choice of the above two methods depends on the value of the structure of their dynamic
coefficient he dynamic coefficient depends on the type of structure, the height of the
structure and its breadth.
The quasi-static method is used for structures whose Cd value is less or equal to 1.2.
For our case the building variables are:
Height of building =25.7m
Width of building =13m
From figure 3.7 of EBCS-1, 1995, the value of the dynamic coefficient of this building is;
Cd=0.98.that is Cd<1.2 and height of the building is less than 200m, this implies that the
simple procedure of EBCS (quasi-static) method of analysis the appropriate method. This is
used for wind load analysis and roof design.
The area where the building is going to be placed has an altitude of 2010m, for which its air
density is, ρ =0.94 Kg/m3 (table 3.1, EBCS-1, 1995).
Out of the different types of roofs, we selected a duo pitched roof with a pitch angle 15 0.
There are two directions of winds to the roof.
Wind perpendicular to the ridge (θ=00).
Wind parallel to the ridge (θ=900).
a) Roof1
A. Wind perpendicular (normal) to the ridge (θ=00).
1.7
24
Wind @ θ=0
Vref = 1*1*1*22=22m/s
qref = ½*0.94*222 = 227.5N/m2 =0.2275KN/m2
Pressure coefficients
A. For wind direction perpendicular to the ridge
H J I
G
F
b=13m
h=25.7m
d=12.5m
F = 3.25*1.3 = 4.23m2<10 m2
G = 6.5*1.3 = 8.45m2<10 m2
J = 1.3*13 = 16.9m2>10 m2
I = 4.95*13 = 64.35m2>10 m2
H = 4.95*13 = 64.35m2>10 m2
From EBCS-1, 1995 table A4 there are two cases where the roof zones are subjected to wind
actions.
These are when zones F, G, H are subjected to pressure and suction.
Cpe, Cpe,10 Cpe,1 Cpe,1 Cpe,1 Cpe,10 Cpe,1 Cpe,10 Cpe,1 Cpe,10
1 0
Cpe -2 -0.9 -1.5 -0.8 -0.3 -0.3 -0.4 -0.4 -1.5 -1.0
Cpe -1.3 -0.85 -0.3 -0.4 -1.0
Pressure 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.4 -1.0
As it can be seen from table 2 and 3, the greatest wind actions are :
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 6
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
The largest suction = -0.924KN/m2
The largest pressure = 0.31KN/m2
F
H I
wind((θ=900) G
H
G
I
F
1.25m 5m 6.25m
b= 12.5m
h = 25.7m
e=b= 12.5 or 2h= 2*25.7=51.4 which ever is greater
Therefore e = 12.5m
Computing the corresponding pressure for each zone as in the steps followed above.
Table 4
Zone F G H I
b) Roof – 2
1.7m
Wind @ θ=00
24m
12.5m
Wind pressure
The pressure coefficients remain the same as for roof-1
Cr (z) = 0.78
Ce (z) = 1.92
A) Wind direction normal to the ridge
Using e=b=15m or e = 2h =51.4m, e = 15m (smaller of the two)
H J I
G
Table 5
zone F G H I J
Area(m2) 5.625 11.25 71.25 22.5 71.25
Cpe -1.18 +0.2 -0.8 +0.2 -0.3 +0.2 -0.4 - -1 -
Cpi +0.8 -0.5 +0.8 -0.5 +0.8 -0.5 +0.8 - +0.8 -
Cpe-Cpi -1.98 +0.7 -1.6 0.7 -1.1 0.7 -1.2 - -1.8 -
Wnet(KN/m2) -0.87 0.31 -0.7 0.31 -0.48 0.31 -0.53 - -0.72 -
The above table is calculated for the cases that F, G and H are in suction and pressure.
There are two cases to take for the internal pressure.
A) When F, G and H are subjected in suction
Taking Cpi = +0.8 (worst Case)
Wnet = We – Wi = 0.44 (Cpe-Cpi)
The maximum wind suction for the above table is -0.87KN/m2.
A) when F, G and H are subjected in pressure
Taking Cpi = -0.5(worst case)
The maximum wind pressure is 0.31KN/m2.
F 3.13m
Wind
H I
G
6.25m
H
G
I
F
3.13m
1.25m 5m 8.75m
From the above computations, the maximum suction on the roof is -1.05KN/m2.
and the maximum pressure is 0.31KN/m2.
For both roofs the design wind action is when wind direction is parallel to the ridge (@
θ=900)
And Wdsign =1.05KN/m2 uniformly distributed suction
=0.31KN/m2 uniformly distributed pressure.
comb-2
Q2=0.31KN/m2 *c/c purlin spacing+1.3(0.03*c/c purlin+0.02
with point load at mid span
=0.31*0.90*+1.3(0.03*0.90+0.02)
=0.34KN/m with Qk=1KN*1.6=1.6KN
comb-3
Q3=-1.05KN/m2 *c/c purlin spacing+1.3(0.03*c/c purlin+0.02)
=-1.05*0.90*+1.3(0.03*0.90+0.02)
=-0.88KN/m
For the two roofs
Roof -1 truss spacing =1.30m
Roof -2 truss spacing =1.50m
From the above two roofs roof -2 will be critical and it is the design roof
For a critical case the purlin is assumed to be simply supported with span length is equal to
1.50m.
For the different load combinations
1) load comb-1
0.75KN/m 0.75KN/m
1.5m 1.5m
Reaction = (0.75*1.5/2)*2=1.13KN
Bending moment=wl2/8=0.75*1.52/8=0.21KNM
2) load comb-2
1.60KN
1.60KN
0.34KN/m 0.34KN/m
Reaction = (0.34*1.5/2+1.6*/2)*2=2.11KN
Bending moment=wl2/8+pl/4=0.34*1.52/8+1.6*1.5/4=0.70KNM
3) load comb-3
0.88KN/m 0.88KN/m
Reaction = (0.88*1.5/2)*2=1.32KN
Bending moment=wl2/8=0.88*1.52/8=0.25KNM
There fore, the actions for the design of the truss, the loads transferred to truss joints are two
2.11KN/m ( down wards)
1.32KN/m ( up wards)
There fore two truss configurations
H=70mm
B=50mm
Span length of purlin member is 1.3m
A = 50mm*70mm = 3500mm2
Moment of inertia, I = bh3/12 = 1.43*106mm4
A. Reaction forces
There are two truss roofs in this building. But the spacing of trusses is the same for both.
From the above analysis of purlin, the reaction forces transferred to truss joints are.
2.11 KN in pressure
1.32 KN in suction
B. self weight
Diameter of truss members = 10 cm
Area = 3.14/4*(0.1)2 = 0.008m2
Assuming the weight of truss members to be located at the junction of the vertical
members and the horizontal members.
Unit weight of eucalyptus member is 8.5KN/m2
Table 7
Name of Length Area (m2) Unit weight Weight (KN)
member (KN/m3)
A 0.9 0.008 8.5 0.061
B 0.9. 0.008 8.5 0.061
C 0.9 0.008 8.5 0.061
D 0.9 0.008 8.5 0.061
E 0.9 0.008 8.5 0.061
F 0.9 0.008 8.5 0.061
G 1.07 0.008 8.5 0.073
H 0.234 0.008 8.5 0.016
I 0.468 0.008 8.5 0.032
J 0.702 0.008 8.5 0.048
K 0.963 0.008 8.5 0.064
L 1.17 0.008 8.5 0.08
M 1.404 0.008 8.5 0.095
N 1.70 0.008 8.5 0.116
O 0.9 0.008 8.5 0.061
P 0.99 0.008 8.5 0.067
Q 1.12 0.008 8.5 0.076
R 1.28 0.008 8.5 0.087
S 1.46 0.008. 8.5 0.099
T 1.652 0.008 8.5 0.112
U 0.87 0.008 8.5 0.059
V 0.87 0.008 8.5 0.059
W 0.87 0.008 8.5 0.059
X 0.87 0.008 8.5 0.059
Y 0.87 0.008 8.5 0.059
Z 0.87 0.008 8.5 0.059
A 1.034 0.008 8.5 0.07
B. upward action
Case A
Case B
A. rafter
P = 8.79 KN (tension)
P = -14.49 KN (compression)
wind pressure
We = qref*Ce(z)*Cpe(z)
qref = ½* ρ*Vref2 = 0.2275KN/m (calculated above for roof).
b = 12m
h = 8m
z = 6m
for terrain category properties, using Ebcs2, table________
KT =0.24
Zo = 1m
Zmin = 16m, Z <Zmin
e =min(b=12,2h=12) ; e=12m
Area F=3.6m2
G=7.2m2
H=57.6m2
I=24.0m2
Since the edge of the eave is sharp cornered, r/h can be approximated to be zero.
Therefore, using EBCS-2 table A4 the external coefficients are calculated as follows.
Table 8
Zone F G H I
Cpe -1.222 -1.27 -0.4 -0.2 +0.2
Cpi +0.8 +0.8 +0.8 +0.8 -0.5
Cpe-Cpi -2.02 -2.07 -1.20 -1.0 +0.7
Wnet -0.72 -0.73 -0.43 -0.35 +0.31
Case-1 when zone I is in suction take Cpi=+0.8
2
Wnet=-0.73KN/m ( suction -uniformly distributed)
Case-2 when zone I is in pressure take Cpi=-0.5
Wnet=+0.31KN/m2 ( pressure- uniformly distributed)
wind pressure
We = qref*Ce(z)*Cpe(z)
qref = ½* ρ*Vref2 = 0.2275KN/m (calculated above for roof).
b = 6m
h = 6m
z = 25.7m
from above roof analysis’s at a height of Z=25.7m
Cr(Z)=0.78
Ct(Z)=1.0
Ce(Z)=1.92
Table 9
Zone F G H I
Chapter-2
2.1 Slab analysis and design
There are two types of slabs based on the load transferring mechanisms. These are one way
and two way slabs.
One-way slabs transmit their load in one direction while two way slabs resist applied two
directions.
These types of slabs are composed of rectangular panels supported at all four edges by
walls or beams stiff enough to be treated as un yielding. In our case most of the slabs are two
way and need to be analyzed based on the principle of two way actions.
2. Loading
Dead and live loads are calculated depending on the service of the slabs and self weight.
Partition loads are distributed over the of the slab if thy are not large enough to cause
localized effects. The design load are factored according to the following formula
Pd = 1.3Gk+1.6Qk
Where
Pd = design load
Gk = total dead load on slab
Qk = total live load on slab
3. Analysis
The analysis of slab moments of two way slabs is accomplished by the formula:
mi = α iPdLx2
where mi = the design moment per unit width at the point of reference
α i = the coefficient given in Table A-1 in EBCS2-1995.
Pd = the design load
Lx = the shorter span of the of the panel
Ly = is the longer span of the panel
In the following diagram the symbols stand for
s = support
f = span
x = direction of shorter span
y = direction of longer span
The actual loads at supports and spans are collected from EBCS-2, 1995 table A-1.
1.50m
Slab 1
6.00m 6.
Slab 0
Slab 5
1.50m
Fig-1.1 labeling
d>(0.4+0.6*Fyk/300)*Le/ ßa
Panels 2,3,&4
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 24
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
Total dead load =4.9KN/m2 the same as above panels
Live load= 5.0KN/m2 the same as above panels
Design load, Pd =14.37KN/m2
Panel 5
The concentrated load is due to hand rails of steel which we consider it as equivalent 15cm
HCB wall of height one meter.
Thus, concentrated load is 0.15*1.00*12=1.8KN
Thus the design load is pd=14.37KN/m2+2.34KN
Fig 2.2
Panel 4
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 26
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
Md =18.37
Mi=20.18 ∆m=1.81; Cx=0.38, Cy=0.28
Mxd=15+0.38*1.81=15.69
Myd=15+0.28*1.81=15.51
Fig2.3
2.0 Mezzanine@3.60
d>(0.4+0.6*Fyk/300)*Le/ ßa
Fig 2.4
2.0 Loading
Panel 5
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 0.2*3*14=8.4KN (concentrated)
Total Dead load, DD=4.9KN/m2 + 8.4KN
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*(4.9+8.4)+1.6*5
Pd = 14.37KN/m2+10.92KN
Panels 6,7,8,10,&11
Total dead load =4.9KN/m2 the same as above panels
Live load= 5.0KN/m2 the same as above panels
Design load, Pd =14.37KN/m2
Panel 9&12
Slab7
Md =17.46
Mi=20.18 ∆m=2.72 ; Cx=0.38, Cy=0.28
Mxd=15.52+0.38*2.72=16.55
Myd=15.52+0.28*2.72=16.28
Slab8
Md =5.93
Mi=6.08 ∆m=0.15; Cx=0.305, Cy=0.094
Mxd=9.05+0.305*.15=10.10
Myd=4.66+0.094*.15=4.67
Slab11
Md =5.93
Mi=6.08 ∆m=0.15; Cx=0.320, Cy=0.12
Mxd=6.85+0.32*.15=6.90
Myd=4.66+0.12*.15=4.68
Fig2.7 labeling
the effective depth required for the above slab panels is tabulated below
Slab panel Ly/Lx Lx ßa d Boundary
condition
1 1.5 4 40 85 Interior
2 1 6 45 113.33 Interior
3 1 6 40 127.5 end
4 1.5 4 40 85 Interior
5 1 6 45 113.33 Interior
6 1 6 40 127.5 End
7 1.13 4 43.7 77.8 Interior
8 1.13 4.5 41.7 91.79 Interior
9 1.13 4.5 36.7 104.22 end
10 1 4 45 75.56 end
11 1.5 4 40 85 Interior
12 1.5 4 35 97.14 end
13 1 6 40 127.5 end
14 1 6 40 127.5 end
15 2 3 30 85 Interior
16 1.33 4.5 36.7 104.22 Interior
17 1.33 4.5 41.7 91.79 end
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 33
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
18 1.5 3 35 72.86 end
19 1.5 4 35 97.14 Interior
20 1.5 4 40 85 End
21 1.33 3 36.7 69.48 Cantilever
22 9.14 1.5 10 127.50 Cantilever
23 21.33 .75 10 63.75 Cantilever
24 20 .75 10 63.75 Cantilever
25 26.07 .75 10 63.75 Cantilever
pane 3 & 14
weight = t*h*unit weight of concrete
where t = 15cm for partition HCB walls
Unit weight of HCB is 12KN/m3
W =5.1*.15*3*12
=27.54 KN
Distributing over the slab panel = 27.54/ (6*6)
0.77KN/m2
Panel 15
Weight = 5.9*0.15*3*12
=31.86KN
Distribute load = 31.86KN/ (4.5*6)
= 0.9KN/m2
Panel 23, 24, 25
Hand rail weight.
Assuming an equivalent weight of 1m height of 15cm HCB wall distributing linearly at the
end of the cantilever slab, the point load for a meter strip cantilever is given below:
Point load = 1*0.15*12=1.8KN/m
b. finishing
The finishing materials for the slab are:
3 cm cement screed with unit weight = 20KN/m3
2 cm marble finish for restaurant with unit weight = 27KN /m3
2 cm terrazzo tile finish for offices and shops with unit weight = 22KN/m3
Distributed load per unit area for cement screed = 0.03*20=.6KN/m2
marble = 0.02*27= 0.54KN/m2
terrazzo tile =0.02*22= 0.44KN/m2
Panel 5, 6, 8, 9
Finishing load = 0.6+.54= 1.14KN/m2
other panels = .6+.44 = 1.04 KN/m2
c. Self weight
weight per m2 of slab = thickness * unit weight of concrete
= .16*24= 3.84 KN/m2
2.20 Live load
From EBCS-1 the different live loads of rooms is given below
Room class live load
Cafes and restaurants C1 3 KN/m2
Terraces C5 5 KN/m2
Shops C5 5 KN/m2
Office stores C5 5 KN/m2
Toilet C1 2 KN/m 2
The different loadings on the slabs can be tabulated below
Panel Partition Finishing Self weight Wind load Live load
load load
1 1.04 3.84 0.31 5
2 1.04 3.84 0.31 5
3 1.04 3.84 0.31 5
4 1.04 3.84 5
5 1.14 3.84 3
6 1.14 3.84 3
7 1.04 3.84 5
8 1.14 3.84 3
9 1.14 3.84 3
10 1.14 3.84 5
11 1.04 3.84 5
12 1.04 3.84 5
13 .77 1.04 3.84 5
14 .77 1.04 3.84 5
15 1.77 1.04 3.84 2
16 .9 1.04 3.84 5
17 1.04 3.84 5
18 1.04 3.84 5
19 1.04 3.84 3
20 1.04 3.84 3
21 1.04 3.84 5
22 1.04 3.84 .31 5
23 *1.8 1.04 3.84 5
24 *1.8 1.04 3.84 5
25 *1.8 1.04 3.84 5
panel Panel Pd Lx ratio αxs αxf αys αyf Mxs Mxf Mys Myf
type
1 1 14.65 4 1.5 0.053 0.040 0.032 0.024 12.42 9.38 5.63 5.63
2 1 14.65 6 1 0.032 0.024 0.032 0.024 16.66 12.66 16.66 12.66
3 3 14.65 6 1 0.039 0.030 0.039 0.030 20.57 15.82 20.57 15.82
4 1 14.34 4 1.5 0.053 0.040 0.032 0.024 12.16 9.18 20.57 5.51
5 1 11.27 6 1 0.032 0.024 0.032 0.024 12.98 9.74 7.34 9.74
6 3 11.27 6 1 0.039 0.030 0.039 0.023 15.82 12.17 12.98 12.72
7 1 14.34 4 1.13 0.039 0.029 0.032 0.024 8.95 6.65 15.82 5.51
8 1 11.27 4.5 1.33 0.047 0.036 0.032 0.024 10.73 8.50 7.34 5.48
9 2 11.27 4.5 1.33 0.053 0.040 0.039 0.029 12.10 9.13 7.3 6.62
Fig-2.8
panel 3
Δm1=20.57-18.82=1.75
Δm2=20.57-18.82=1.75 Ly/Lx=1 Cx1=0.38 Cy1=0.28 Cx2=0.28
Cy2=0.38
Mdxf= Mdyf =15.82+0.38*1.75+0.28*1.75=16.88KNm
panel 4
Δm1=20.57-18.82=1.75
Δm2=20.57-18.82=1.75 Ly/Lx=1 Cx1=0.38 Cy1=0.28 Cx2=0.28
Cy2=0.38
Mdxf= Mdyf =15.82+0.38
Fig 2.9
Panel Panel r pd Lx ßvxc ßvxd ßvyc ßvyd Vxc Vxd Vyc Vyd
name type =Ly/Lx
1 1 1.5 14.65 4 0.45 - 0.33 - 26.7 - 19.34 -
2 1 1 14.65 6 0.33 - 0.33 - 29.01 - 29.01 -
3 3 1 14.65 6 0.36 0.24 0.36 - 31.64 21.10 31.64 -
4 1 1.5 14.34 4 0.45 - 0.33 - 25.81 - 18.93 -
5 1 1 11.27 6 0.33 = 0.33 - 22.31 - 22.31 -
6 3 1 11.276 6 0.36 0.24 0.36 - 24.34 16.23 24.34 -
7 1 1.13 14.34 4 0.36 - 0.33 - 20.65 - 18.93 -
8 1 1.33 11.27 4.5 0.42 - 0.33 - 21.30 16.74 -
9 2 1.33 11.27 4.5 0.44 - 0.36 0.24 22.31 - 18.26 12.17
10 1 1 14.34 4 0.33 - 0.33 - 18.93 - 18.93 -
11 1 1.5 14.34 4 0.45 - 0.33 - 25.81 - 18.93 -
12 2 1.5 14.34 4 0.47 - 0.36 0.24 26.96 - 20.65 13.77
13 4 1 15.35 6 0.4 0.26 0.4 0.26 36.84 23.95 36.84 23.95
14 2 1 15.35 6 0.36 - 0.36 0.24 33.16 - 33.16 22.10
15 4 2 11.85 3 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.26 21.33 14.22 14.22 9.24
16 2 1.33 15.51 4.5 0.44 - 0.36 0.24 30.71 - 25.13 16.75
17 1 1.33 14.34 4.5 0.41 - 0.33 - 26.46 - 21.29 -
18 3 1.5 14.34 3 0.51 0.34 0.36 - 21.94 14.63 15.49 -
19 2 1.5 11.14 4 0.47 - 0.36 0.24 20.94 - 16.04 10.69
20 1 1.5 11.14 4 0.45 - 0.33 - 20.05 - 14.7 -
21 3 1.3 14.34 3 0.47 0.31 0.36 - 20.22 13.34 15.49 -
22 canti - 14.65 1.5 - - - - 21.98 - - -
23 canti - 14.34+2.34 0.75 - - - - 13. - - -
24 canti - 14.34+2.34 0.75 - - - - 13 - - -
25 canti - 14.34+2.34 0.75 - - - - 13 - - -
2.0 Loading
Panel 1 and 2
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 5*.15*3*12/36 =0.75KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.75+0.46+0.6 = 5.63KN/m2
Live load, LL=4KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*(5.63)+1.6*4
Pd = 13.75KN/m2
Panel 4 and 5
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 5*.15*3*12/36 =0.75KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.75+0.46+0.6 = 5.63KN/m2
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*(5.63)+1.6*5
Pd = 15.34KN/m2
Panel 6
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 5.45*.15*3*12/36 =1.635KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+1.635+0.46+0.6 = 6.535KN/m2
Live load, LL=2KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*(6.535)+1.6*2
Pd = 11.69KN/m2
Panel 7,8,10, and 11
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 0KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.46+0.6 = 4.9 KN/m2
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*4.9+1.6*5
Pd = 14.37 KN/m2
Panel 12
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 0KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.46+0.6 = 4.9 KN/m2
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*4.9+1.6*5
Pd = 14.37 KN/m2
Panel b, c, f , g, h
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
-partition load concentrated = 1.3*3*.2*14 = 10.92KN/m
- Partition wall = 0.2*2*3*14/3 = 5.6KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.46+0.6+5.6 = 10.5 KN/m2
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*10.5+1.6*5
Pd = 21.65 KN/m2
Panel a ,e
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
-partition load concentrated = 1.3*3*.2*14 = 10.92KN/m
- Partition wall = 0.2*2*3*14/7 = 2.4KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.46+0.6+2.4 = 7.7 KN/m2
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*7.7+1.6*5
Pd = 18.01 KN/m2
Slab5
Md =21.54
Mi=17.62 ∆m1=3.92 ; Cx=0.38, Cy=0.28\
M2=18.79 ∆m2=2.75
Mxd=16.02+.38*3.92+.28*2.75=18.28
Myd=16.02+.38*3.92+.28*2.75 =18.28
Slab12
Md =6.08
Mi=5.52 ∆m=0.56; Cx=0.305, Cy=0.094
Mxd=7.63+0.305*0.56=7.8
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 46
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
Myd=4.66+0.094*.56=4.71
2.0 Loading
Panel 1, 2, 4 and 5
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 5*.15*3*12/36 =0.75KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.75+0.46+0.6 = 5.63KN/m2
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*(5.63) +1.6*5 Pd = 15.345KN/m2
Panel 7, 8, 10 and 11
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 0KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.46+0.6 = 4.90KN/m2
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*(4.90) +1.6*5 Pd = 14.37KN/m2
Panel 6
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 5.45*.15*3*12/18 =1.635KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+1.635+0.46+0.6 = 6.535KN/m2
Live load, LL=2KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*(6.535) +1.6*2 Pd = 11.69KN/m2
Pd = 14.37 KN/m2
Panel 12
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
- Partition wall = 0KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.46+0.6 = 4.9 KN/m2
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL
= 1.3*4.9+1.6*5
Pd = 14.37 KN/m2
Panel b, c, f, g, h (cantilever slabs)
- Self weight=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
- Terrazzo tile floor finish (2cm)=0.02*23=0.46KN/m2
- cement screed (3cm)=0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
-partition load concentrated = 1.3*3*.2*14 = 10.92KN/m
- Partition wall = 0.2*2*3*14/3 = 5.6KN/m2
Total Dead load, DD=3.84+0.46+0.6+5.6 = 10.5 KN/m2
Live load, LL=5KN/m2
Design load Pd= 1.3DD+1.6LL = 1.3*10.5+1.6*5 Pd = 21.65 KN/m2
1. Depth determination
d>(0.4+0.6*Fyk/400)*Le/ßa
8 6 45 114
9 4.5 36.70 104
10 3 30 85
11 3 35 73
2.Loading
2.1 Dead loads(DD)
For all slabs
Self weight 0f the slab=0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
2cmTerrazzo tile Floor finish =23*0.02=0.46KN/m2
3cm thickness Cement screed =0.03*20=0.60KN/m2
Partition load
3. Analysis
Mi=αi*Pd*Lx^2
panel Panel Pd Lx ratio αxs αxf αys αyf Mxs Mxf Mys Myf
type
1 Cant 15.71+8.19 1 - - - - - 16.01 - - -
2 Cant 15.71+8.19 1 - - - - - 16.01 - - -
3 Cant 15.71+8.19 - - - - - 16.01 - - -
4 1 15.37 6 1 0.032 0.024 0.032 0.024 17.71 13.28 17.71 13.28
5 1 14.37 4.5 1.33 0.048 0.033 0.032 0.024 13.97 9.60 9.31 6.98
6 Cant 15.71+8.19 1 - - - - - 16.01 - - -
7 Cant 16.37+8.19 1 - - - - - 16.38 - - -
8 2 15.37 6 1 0.039 0.029 0.039 0.029 21.58 16.05 21.58 16.05
9 2 14.37 4.5 1.33 0.071 0.053 0.039 0.029 20.60 15.42 13.68 10.48
10 4 13.26 3 2 0.093 0.070 0.047 0.036 11.10 8.35 5.61 4.30
11 4 14.37 3 1.5 0.073 0.059 0.047 0.036 10.09 7.63 6.08 4.60
Panel 9a
b/n 5&9
Md=11.8
Mi=13.68 Δm=1.88
Cx=0.327; Cy=0.137
Mxd=15.42+0.327*1.88=16.03 KNm
Mxd= 10.48+.137*1.88=10.74 KNm
In the other supports the moment increased that no span moment adjustment is
important.
Panel 4b
b/n 4&8
Since moment increased no span moment adjustment is required
b/n 4&6
Since moment increased no span moment adjustment is required
b/n 4&10
Md=12.20
Mi=17.71 Δm1=5.51 Cx=0.380; Cy=0.280
b/n 4&5
Md=16.11
Mi=17.71 Δm=1.60 Cx=0.380; Cy=0.280
Mxd=13.28+0.38*(5.51+1.6)=15.98 KNm
Mxd= 13.28+0.28(5.51+1.6)=15.27KNm
Panel 5b
In all directions the support moments increased so that no span moment adjustment
is required.
Panel 10
In all directions the support moments increased so that no span moment adjustment is
required.
Panel 11
b/n 5&11
Md=9.70
Mi=10.09 Δm1=0.39 Cx=0.484; Cy=0.248
b/n 11&10
Md=5.85
Mi=6.08 Δm2=0.23 Cx=0.238; Cy=0.0.055
Mxd=4.66+.484*0.39+0.238*0.23=4.90 KNm
Mxd= 7.63+0.248*0.39+0.055*0.23=7.71KNm
Fig 2.19
This slab is simply supported and belongs to all floor with the same configuration.
Ly/Lx >2.0, therefore it is one way slab with simply supported support conditions.
1. Depth for deflection
0.6 f yk Le
d ( 0 .4 ) , le =2500mm & β = 25
400 a
d ≥ 85mm (<131mm) ok.
2. Loading
i. Dead load
a. self weight= t*γc = 0.16*24=3.84KN/m2
b. finishing
3 cm cement screed,
=0.03*20=0.6KN/m2
2 cm terrazzo tile,
=0.02*22=0.4KN/m2
ii. live load, access for office = 5KN/m2
Design load = 1.3*DL+1.6*LL
= 1.3*(3.84+0.6+0.44) +1.6*5
Pd= 14.344KN/m2
Shear and moments
The slab is treated as a one way solid slab. Taking a meter strip and modeling it as a simply
supported beam:
14.344
2.5m
V=14.34*2.5/2=17.93KN/m
Md= wl2/8=14.344*2.52/8=11.21KN-m
6.0m
6.0m
1. Depth for deflection
L 6000
d 0.85 e d 0.85 * 145.71
a 35
Using Ф14
D=d+ cover +0.5* (0.5Ф+1.5 Ф)
145.71+15+14=174.71
D=180mm, d=151mm
2. Loading
-Wind load =0.31KN/m2 (pressure)
- Self weight = 0.18*24=4.32 KN/m2 (DL)
- Floor finish
- cement screed= 0.03*20=0.6 KN/m2 (DL)
- 10,000lt water tanker =9.81/ (6*6) =2.73 KN/m2 (LL)
- Live load =1 KN/m2 (LL)
Design load Pd=0.31+1.3*(4.32+0.6) +1.6*(1+2.73)
= 12.67 KN/m2
3. Analysis
M i i pd L2x
Using appendix A of EBCS-2, 95
The slab is categorized under panel type 9, and hence
αxf=αyf=0.056
Therefore Mxf=25.54=Myf
4. Load transfer
Vx=Vy=ßvxPdLx, ßvx=0.33
= 0.33*12.67*6=25.09
The reinforcements are provided for the design moments using design charts from
EBCS_2;part II ,19995 table 1a
Md
b
Km = where Md = design moment
d
b = width of slab taken as 1.00m
d = effective depth of slab.
Using Km and C-25 ,S-300 Ks is read from the chart and
As= Ks *Md /d
This is compared with the minimum reinforcement for temperature and shrinkage given as
As,min =ρmin *b*d where ρmin= 0.5/fyk
The spacing of the calculated bars is determined as
S= 10000*as/As
or
2D which ever is minimum
design of slabs
As As spacing
slab level Md Km Ks cal As.min provide Ø s provided
mezanine@3m
support
sup b/n 0&2 12.6 27 4 385 218 385 10 204 Ø10 c/c200
1&2,3,4 32.55 44 4.26 1058 218 1058 14 145 Ø14 c/c140
2&3 14.81 29 4.04 457 218 457 10 172 Ø 10c/c170
3&4 18.37 33 4.08 572 218 572 12 198 Ø12 c/c190
5&2,3 19.68 34 4.09 614 218 614 12 184 Ø 12c/c180
span
panel 2 9.2 23 3.97 279 218 279 8 180 Ø8 c/c180
5.52 18 3.95 166 218 218 8 230 Ø8 c/c230
3 13.08 28 4.01 400 218 400 10 196 Ø10 c/c190
12.91 27 4 394 218 394 10 199 Ø10 c/c190
4 15.69 30 4.05 485 218 485 10 162 Ø10 c/c160
15.51 30 4.05 480 218 480 10 164 Ø10 c/c160
mezanine@3.6m
support
9&6,7 19.68 34 4.09 614 218 614 12 184 Ø12 c/c180
6&7 22.4 36 4.1 701 218 701 12 161 Ø12 c/c160
7&8 17.46 32 4.06 541 218 541 12 209 Ø12 c/c200
8&10 5.93 19 3.95 179 218 218 8 230 Ø8 c/c230
10&11 5.93 19 3.95 179 218 218 8 230 Ø8 c/c230
12&11 32.55 44 4.26 1058 218 1058 14 145 Ø14 c/c140
span
6 19.41 34 4.09 606 218 606 12 187 Ø12 c/c180
19.2 33 4.08 598 218 598 12 189 Ø12 c/c180
7 16.55 31 4.07 514 218 514 12 220 Ø12 c/c220
16.28 31 4.07 506 218 506 12 224 Ø12 c/c220
Fig 2.20
For 24
Lo ≥45*24 = 1080mm
For 20
Lo ≥45*20 = 900mm
For 16
Lo ≥45*16 = 720mm
A. stair 1
The stair from ground level to 1.05m height can be modeled as follows.
Above the ground the stair starts from slab rather than from ground. Therefore, it is modeled
as follows.
B. stair 2
This stair runs from the first landing to the second landing. It is totally supported
by the lower and upper stairs on their respective landings.
C. stair 3
This stair runs from the second landing to the end of the next floor. It is modeled as.
DL = 6+0.88+0.95 = 7.83KN/m
ii. Live load for staircase is 3KN/m2
design load , Pd = 1.3*7.83+1.6*3 = 13.42KN/m
Landing
i. dead load
The weight similarly calculated as above.
o Self weight = 4.8KN/m
o Floor finish = 1.06KN/m
ii. live load = 3KN/m2
Design load, Pd = 1.3*4.8+1.6*3 = 12.4 KN/m
3. Analysis
Stair 2
Stair1
A. starting from ground level
Loading
Loading
3. stair 3
Loading
4. Reinforcement
Using the sap2000 analysis results, reinforcement for each moments are calculated using
EBCS-2 part-2 design chart.
Effective depth of the stairs is 170mm.
Main reinforcement bars
Spacing
Md calculated
ks * Md 1000a s Spacing
Km b AS= =
Name moment Ks d AS Provided
d
support 31.34 32.9 4.08 752 12 C/C150
Stair 1
span 33.63 34.1 4.1 822 12 C/C 130
support - - - - - -
Stair 2 span 15.08 22.8 3.97 352 10 C/C 220
Stair 3 support 31.34 32.9 4.08 752 12 C/C 150
Span 21.88 27.5 4.02 517 10 C/C 150
Chapter 3
Earth quake analysis
3.1 Determination of design earth quake force
The seismic base shear force, Fb, for each main direction is determined from:
I. determination of base shear
Fb = Sd(T1)W
Sd(T1) = α ß γ
The parameter α is the ratio of the design bed rock acceleration to acceleration of gravity,
g and is given by:
α = α0I
αo =the bed rock acceleration ratio for the site and depends on the seismic zone as
given in table 1.1 of EBCS-8, 95 (page 10).
Zone 4 3 2 1
αo 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.03
In our case the building is in Mekelle which is located in zone 4; this implies αo = 0.1
I = the importance factor of the building (table 2.4, EBCS-8, 95, page 29)
The structure is under category II of EBCS-8 ; there fore I = 1.2
The parameter ß is the design response factor for the site and is given by:
1 .2 S
2/3
2 .5
T1
S = site coefficient for soil characteristics. Table 1.2 (page 11)
Sub soil A B C
class
S 1.0 1.2 1.5
The soil is sub soil class A (class A includes rock, stiff deposits of sand, gravel or over
consolidated clay). There fore S = 1.0.
T1 = the fundamental period of vibration of the structure (in sec) for translational motion in
the direction of motion. For buildings with heights up to 80m, the value of T 1 may be
approximated using:
T1= C1H3/4
Where H = height of the building above the base in meters
= 25.7m
C1 = 0.075 for RC moment resisting frames and eccentrically braced
steel frames.
Hence T1= 0.075*(25.7)3/4 = 0.86
1 .2 * 1 .0
2.5 1.33 2.5 OK
0.86 2 / 3
The parameter γ is the behavior factor to account for energy dissipation capacity, shall be
derived for each design direction as follows.
γ = γo KD KR KW ≤ 0.70
Where γo = basic type of the behavior factor, dependent on the structural type (table 3.2
Page 37)
Xm
Wi X i ; Ym
WiYi
Wi Wi
Where Xm, Ym= the coordinate of the point of application of Fi when the seismic action is
parallel to the Y-direction and X-direction respectively.
1st floor 0 0
slab 0 0
1 27 0.18 4.86 24 116.64 3 2.25 349.92 262.44
2 36 0.18 6.48 24 155.52 3 7.5 466.56 1166.4
3 45 0.18 8.1 24 194.4 3 14.25 583.2 2770.2
4 45 0.18 8.1 24 194.4 9 14.25 1749.6 2770.2
5 36 0.18 6.48 24 155.52 9 7.5 1399.68 1166.4
6 27 0.18 4.86 24 116.64 9 2.25 1049.76 262.44
7 27 0.18 4.86 24 116.64 21 2.25 2449.44 262.44
8 36 0.18 6.48 24 155.52 21 7.5 3265.92 1166.4
9 36 0.18 6.48 24 155.52 27 7.5 4199.04 1166.4
10 27 0.18 4.86 24 116.64 27 2.25 3149.28 262.44
11 13.5 0.18 2.43 24 58.32 31.5 2.25 1837.08 131.22
12 18 0.18 3.24 24 77.76 31.5 7.5 2449.44 583.2
13 74.25 0.18 13.365 24 320.76 3.75 -2.25 1202.85 -721.71
14 81 0.18 14.58 24 349.92 -2.25 9 -787.32 3149.28
15 67.5 0.18 12.15 24 291.6 28.5 2.25 8310.6 656.1
wall 2575.8 31675.05 15053.85
1 1.98 3 5.94 14 83.16 6 10.5 498.96 873.18
2 4.2 3 12.6 14 176.4 22.5 10.5 3969 1852.2
3 1.04 3 3.12 14 43.68 20.62 5.5 900.6816 240.24
4 1.04 3 3.12 14 43.68 25.59 5.5 1117.771 240.24
5 0.46 3 1.38 14 19.32 30.82 5.5 595.4424 106.26
6 1.62 3 4.86 14 68.04 28.95 4.5 1969.758 306.18
7 0.78 3 2.34 14 32.76 22.09 4.5 723.6684 147.42
8 2.4 3 7.2 14 100.8 6 18 604.8 1814.4
9 0.9 3 2.7 14 37.8 12 2.25 453.6 85.05
10 0.9 3 2.7 14 37.8 12 8.25 453.6 311.85
11 2.1 3 6.3 14 88.2 18 5.25 1587.6 463.05
12 0.9 3 2.7 14 37.8 20.1 2.25 759.78 85.05
13 0.9 3 2.7 14 37.8 33 2.25 1247.4 85.05
14 1.2 3 3.6 14 50.4 33 7.5 1663.2 378
15 1 3 3 14 42 30 8 1260 336
16 3.6 3 10.8 25 270 0 9 0 2430
17 2.4 3 7.2 25 180 6 0 1080 0
18 3 3 9 25 225 25.5 0 5737.5 0
beam 1574.64 24622.76 9754.17
x1 0.12 22.75 2.73 24 65.52 -4 6.625 -262.08 434.07
2 0.12 22.75 2.73 24 65.52 0 6.625 0 434.07
3 0.12 22.75 2.73 24 65.52 6 6.625 393.12 434.07
4 0.12 22.75 2.73 24 65.52 12 6.625 786.24 434.07
5 0.12 15.25 1.83 24 43.92 18 2.875 790.56 126.27
6 0.12 15.25 1.83 24 43.92 24 2.875 1054.08 126.27
7 0.12 15.25 1.83 24 43.92 30 2.875 1317.6 126.27
8 0.12 15.25 1.83 24 43.92 33 2.875 1449.36 126.27
y1 0.12 37.75 4.53 24 108.72 14.125 -4 1535.67 -434.88
mezanine@3 0 0
slab 0 0
1 83.89 0.18 15.1002 24 362.4048 0.6 14.38 217.44 5211.38
2 46.56 0.18 8.3808 24 201.1392 9 14.38 1810.25 2892.38
wall 563.544 2027.70 8103.76
1 4.59 3 13.77 14 192.78 -4.14 6.79 -798.11 1308.98
2 1.16 3 3.48 14 48.72 6 14.38 292.32 700.59
3 1.55 3 4.65 14 65.1 12.08 14.38 786.41 936.14
4 1.2 0.6 0.72 14 10.08 12.08 7.5 121.77 75.60
11 2 0.6 1.2 14 16.8 0.6 10.58 10.08 177.74
12 1.04 3 3.12 14 43.68 9.4 10.58 410.59 462.13
15 1.84 3 5.52 14 77.28 12.08 -0.1 933.54 -7.73
16 1.2 3 3.6 14 50.4 15 2.25 756.00 113.40
17 1.2 3 3.6 14 50.4 15 0 756.00 0.00
18 1.2 0.6 0.72 14 10.08 15 10.58 151.20 106.65
19 3.36 3 10.08 14 141.12 3.6 18.11 508.03 2555.68
20 3.36 3 10.08 14 141.12 3.6 -4.62 508.03 -651.97
22 0.23 3 0.69 14 9.66 11.25 15 108.68 144.90
23 0.45 3 1.35 14 18.9 10.5 16.5 198.45 311.85
24 2.36 3 7.08 14 99.12 1.1 4 109.03 396.48
33 0.07 2.4 0.168 24 4.032 18 -4 72.58 -16.13
beam 979.272 4924.60 6614.32
x1 0.12 22.75 2.73 24 65.52 -4 6.625 -262.08 434.07
2 0.12 7.5 0.9 24 21.6 0 14.25 0.00 307.80
3 0.12 7.5 0.9 24 21.6 6 14.25 129.60 307.80
4 0.12 22.75 2.73 24 65.52 12 6.625 786.24 434.07
5 0.12 15.25 1.83 24 43.92 18 2.875 790.56 126.27
3.2.7 Foundation
foundation
column 0 0
1 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 0 10.5 0 100.8
2 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 6 10.5 57.6 100.8
3 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 12 10.5 115.2 100.8
4 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 18 10.5 172.8 100.8
5 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 24 10.5 230.4 100.8
6 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 30 10.5 288 100.8
7 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 33 10.5 316.8 100.8
8 0.13 2.5 0.325 24 7.8 0 4.5 0 35.1
9 0.13 2.5 0.325 24 7.8 6 4.5 46.8 35.1
10 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 12 4.5 115.2 43.2
11 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 18 4.5 172.8 43.2
12 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 24 4.5 230.4 43.2
13 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 30 4.5 288 43.2
14 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 33 4.5 316.8 43.2
15 0.13 2.5 0.325 24 7.8 0 0 0 0
16 0.13 2.5 0.325 24 7.8 6 0 46.8 0
17 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 12 0 115.2 0
18 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 18 0 172.8 0
19 0.13 2.5 0.325 24 7.8 24 0 187.2 0
20 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 30 0 288 0
21 0.16 2.5 0.4 24 9.6 33 0 316.8 0
22 0.07 2.5 0.175 24 4.2 12 16.5 50.4 69.3
23 0.07 2.5 0.175 24 4.2 6 16.5 25.2 69.3
24 0.07 2.5 0.175 24 4.2 0 16.5 0 69.3
25 0.07 2.5 0.175 24 4.2 -4 16.5 -16.8 69.3
26 0.07 2.5 0.175 24 4.2 -4 10.5 -16.8 44.1
27 0.07 2.5 0.175 24 4.2 -4 4.5 -16.8 18.9
28 0.07 2.5 0.175 24 4.2 -4 0 -16.8 0
29 0.07 2.5 0.175 24 4.2 -4 -4 -16.8 -16.8
Xm
W X i i
; Ym
W Y
i i
W i W i
Where Xm, Ym= the coordinate of the point of application of Fi when the seismic action is
parallel to the Y-direction and X-direction respectively.
Xs
Diy xi ; Y Dix yi Where Dix= aKixc and Diy= aKiyc
Diy Dix
s
hb 3
Iy I x bh 3
Kx ; Ky
L 12 L L 12 L
Shear center (Xi, Yi): a point where the center of stiffness (shear center) of the ith shear wall
or column is located.
a
k
for general case ; Where k
k beam
for general case
2k 2k c
a
0 .5 k
for fixed column base k
k beam
for fixed column base
2k kc
0 .5 k
a for pin sup ported columns
1 2k
Note: this representation is consistent for all beams and columns in any frame.
axis-x1
gr. floor
column b h l kxc kyc k a Dy Xi ∑DyiXi
a 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.98 0.50 527.96
b 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.85 0.61 649.00
c 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.52 0.57 610.62
d 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.31 0.55 580.82
e 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.65 0.43 462.08
g.beam ki 2830.50 -4 -11322
1 40 50 400 1041.67
2 40 50 450 925.93
3 40 50 600 694.44
4 40 50 600 694.44
mezanine
column
a 30 300 132.5 132.47 5.44 0.73 96.87
b 30 300 132.5 132.47 10.28 0.84 110.89
c 30 300 132.5 132.47 8.46 0.81 107.15
d 30 300 132.5 132.47 7.26 0.78 103.84
e 30 300 132.5 132.47 3.63 0.64 85.39
-
504.14 -4 2016.57
beam ki
1 30 40 400 400.00
2 30 40 450 355.56
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 95
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
3 30 40 600 266.67
4 30 40 600 266.67 22900.7
first floor
column
a 30 300 132.5 132.47 3.02 0.60 79.69
b 30 300 132.5 132.47 5.70 0.74 98.08
c 30 300 132.5 132.47 4.70 0.70 92.91
d 30 300 132.5 132.47 4.03 0.67 88.50
e 30 300 132.5 132.47 2.01 0.50 66.45
beam 425.63 -4 -1702.5
beam ki
1 30 40 400 400.00
2 30 40 450 355.56
3 30 40 600 266.67
4 30 40 600 266.67
axis-x2
groun floor
column b h l kxc kyc
a 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.98 0.50 527.96
b 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.85 0.61 649.00
c 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.52 0.57 610.62
d 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.31 0.55 580.82
e 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.65 0.43 462.08
g.beam ki 2830.50 0 0
1 40 50 400 1041.67
2 40 50 450 925.93
3 40 50 600 694.44
4 40 50 600 694.44
mezanine(+3)
coumn
a 30 300 132.5 132.47 3.93 0.66 87.80
b 40 300 418.7 418.67 2.35 0.54 226.17
c 40 300 418.7 418.67 1.94 0.49 205.88
d 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.93 0.32 282.10
e 30 300 132.5 132.47 3.63 0.64 85.39
beam ki 887.35 0 0
5 30 40 600 266.67
other 0.00
first floor
level
a 30 300 132.5 132.47 1.51 0.43 56.98
b 40 300 418.7 418.67 0.90 0.31 130.16
Axis x6
ground floor
column b h l kxc kyc
a 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.98 0.50 527.96
b 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.85 0.61 649.00
c 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 2.52 0.67 710.28
d 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.65 0.43 462.08
g.beam ki 2349.33 24 56383.9
1 40 50 400 1041.67
2 40 50 450 925.93
3 40 50 600 694.44
mezanine
column
a 30 360 110.4 110.39 4.72 0.70 77.53
b 40 360 348.9 348.89 1.33 0.40 139.15
c 40 360 348.9 348.89 2.70 0.57 200.56
d 35 45 360 446.6 738.28 0.65 0.25 181.28
beam ki 598.52 24 14364.6
3 30 40 600 266.67
other 0.00
first floor
column
a 30 240 165.6 165.59 1.21 0.38 62.35
b 35 45 240 669.9 1107.42 0.34 0.15 161.37
c 35 45 240 669.9 1107.42 0.40 0.17 185.08
d 35 45 240 669.9 1107.42 0.24 0.11 119.01
beam ki 527.80 24 12667.2
1 30 40 400 400.00
2 30 40 450 355.56
3 30 40 600 266.67
2nd floor
column
a 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.93 0.32 169.49
b 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.44 0.18 158.54
c 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.42 0.17 92.10
beam ki 420.13 24 10083.2
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
3rd floor
Column
a 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.45 0.18 97.36
b 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.47 0.19 168.73
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 100
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
c 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.33 0.14 76.51
beam ki 342.59 24 8222.22
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
4th floor
column
a 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.45 0.18 97.36
b 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.47 0.19 168.73
c 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.33 0.14 76.51
beam ki 342.59 24 8222.22
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
5th floor
column
a 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 1.27 0.39 72.83
b 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 2.22 0.53 98.70
c 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 0.95 0.32 60.50
beam ki 232.04 24 5568.93
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
6th floor
column
a 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 1.27 0.39 72.83
b 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 2.22 0.53 98.70
c 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 0.95 0.32 60.50
beam ki 232.04 24 5568.93
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
roof level
column
a 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 1.27 0.39 72.83
b 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 2.22 0.53 98.70
c 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 0.95 0.32 60.50
beam ki 232.04 24 5568.93
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
Axis x7
ground floor
column b h l kxc kyc
a 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.98 0.50 527.96
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 101
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
b 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.85 0.61 649.00
c 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.52 0.57 610.62
d 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.65 0.43 462.08
g.beam ki 2249.67 30 67490.2
1 40 50 400 1041.67
2 40 50 450 925.93
3 40 50 600 694.44
mezanine
column
a 30 360 110.4 110.39 6.53 0.77 84.51
b 35 45 360 446.6 738.28 1.84 0.48 354.18
c 40 0 360 348.9 348.89 3.21 0.62 215.06
d 35 45 360 446.6 738.28 0.65 0.25 181.28
beam ki 835.03 30 25050.9
1 30 40 400 400.00
2 30 40 450 355.56
3 30 40 600 266.67
first floor
column
a 30 240 165.6 165.59 0.36 0.15 25.33
b 35 45 240 669.9 1107.42 0.68 0.25 281.69
c 35 45 240 669.9 1107.42 0.56 0.22 242.88
d 35 45 240 669.9 1107.42 0.24 0.11 119.01
beam ki 668.90 30 20067
1 30 40 400 400.00
2 30 40 450 355.56
3 30 40 600 266.67
2nd floor
column
a 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.93 0.32 169.49
b 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.59 0.23 200.87
c 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.42 0.17 92.10
beam ki 462.46 30 13873.8
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
3rd floor
column
a 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.45 0.18 97.36
b 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.47 0.19 168.73
c 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.33 0.14 76.51
beam ki 342.59 30 10277.8
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
4th floor
column
a 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.45 0.18 97.36
b 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.47 0.19 168.73
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 102
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
c 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.33 0.14 76.51
beam ki 342.59 30 10277.8
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
5th floor
column
a 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 1.27 0.39 72.83
b 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 2.22 0.53 98.70
c 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 0.95 0.32 60.50
beam ki 232.04 30 6961.16
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
6th floor
column
a 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 1.27 0.39 72.83
b 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 2.22 0.53 98.70
c 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 0.95 0.32 60.50
beam ki 232.04 30 6961.16
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
roof level
column
a 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 1.27 0.39 72.83
b 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 2.22 0.53 98.70
c 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 0.95 0.32 60.50
beam ki 232.04 30 6961.16
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
Axis x8
ground floor
column b h l kxc kyc
a 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.98 0.50 527.96
b 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.85 0.61 649.00
c 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 1.52 0.57 610.62
d 35 45 250 643.1 1063.13 0.65 0.43 462.08
g.beam ki 2249.67 33 74239.2
1 40 50 400 1041.67
2 40 50 450 925.93
3 40 50 600 694.44
mezani
ne
column
a 35 45 360 446.6 738.28 0.98 0.33 242.19
b 35 45 360 446.6 738.28 1.84 0.48 354.18
c 40 0 360 348.9 348.89 3.21 0.62 215.06
first floor
column
a 30 40 240 375 666.67 0.36 0.15 101.98
b 35 45 240 669.9 1107.42 0.68 0.25 281.69
c 35 45 240 669.9 1107.42 0.56 0.22 242.88
d 35 45 240 669.9 1107.42 0.24 0.11 119.01
beam ki 745.55 33 24603.2
1 30 40 400 400.00
2 30 40 450 355.56
3 30 40 600 266.67
2nd floor
column
a 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.93 0.32 169.49
b 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.59 0.23 200.87
c 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.42 0.17 92.10
beam ki 462.46 33 15261.1
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
3rd floor
column
a 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.45 0.18 97.36
b 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.47 0.19 168.73
c 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.33 0.14 76.51
beam ki 342.59 33 11305.6
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
4th floor
column
a 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.45 0.18 97.36
b 35 45 300 535.9 885.94 0.47 0.19 168.73
c 30 40 300 300 533.33 0.33 0.14 76.51
beam ki 342.59 33 11305.6
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
5th floor
column
a 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 1.27 0.39 72.83
b 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 2.22 0.53 98.70
c 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 0.95 0.32 60.50
beam ki 232.04 33 7657.28
1 30 35 450 238.19
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 104
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
2 30 35 600 178.65
6th floor
column
a 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 1.27 0.39 72.83
b 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 2.22 0.53 98.70
c 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 0.95 0.32 60.50
beam ki 232.04 33 7657.28
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
roof level
column
a 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 1.27 0.39 72.83
b 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 2.22 0.53 98.70
c 25 30 300 130.2 187.50 0.95 0.32 60.50
beam ki 232.04 33 7657.3
1 30 35 450 238.19
2 30 35 600 178.65
axis y1
g.floor
column b h l kx ky k a D Yi yi*Di
a 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 1.62 0.59 376.61
b 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.70 0.68 437.85
c 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
d 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
e 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
f 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
g 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 3.24 0.71 459.00
h 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 105
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
3329.50 -400 -1331800
g.beam
1 40 50 400 1041.67
2 40 50 600 694.44
3 40 50 600 694.44
4 40 50 600 694.44
5 40 50 600 694.44
6 40 50 600 694.44
7 40 50 300 1388.89
mezanine@3
column
a 30 300 132.47 6.44 0.76 101.08
b 30 300 132.47 10.73 0.84 111.66
c 30 300 132.47 8.59 0.81 107.44
d 30 300 132.47 8.59 0.81 107.44
e 30 300 132.47 6.91 0.78 102.75
f 30 300 132.47 5.24 0.72 95.89
g 30 300 132.47 7.86 0.80 105.61
h 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.30 0.39 210.30
beam 942.17 -376868.5
1 35 45 400 664.45 0.00
2 35 45 600 442.97 0.00
3 35 45 600 442.97 0.00
4 35 45 600 442.97 0.00
5 0 0 0.00 0.00
6 0 0 0.00 0.00
7 0 0 0.00 0.00
0.00
mezanine@3.6 0.00
column 0.00
a 30 60 662.34 0.50 0.20 132.81
b 30 60 662.34 0.84 0.29 195.24
c 30 60 662.34 0.67 0.25 165.98
d 30 60 662.34 0.67 0.25 165.98
e 30 60 662.34 0.54 0.21 139.93
f 30 60 662.34 0.40 0.17 110.99
g 30 60 662.34 0.60 0.23 153.61
h 30 60 662.34 0.40 0.17 110.99
beam 1175.54 -400 -470214.9
1 0 0.00 0.00
2 0 0.00 0.00
3 0 0.00 0.00
4 0 0.00 0.00
5 30 40 600 266.67 0.00
6 30 40 600 266.67 0.00
7 30 40 300 533.33 0.00
first floor 0.00
column 0.00
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 106
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
a 30 240 165.59 1.21 0.38 62.35
b 30 240 165.59 2.01 0.50 83.06
c 30 240 165.59 1.61 0.45 73.86
d 30 240 165.59 1.61 0.45 73.86
e 30 240 165.59 2.42 0.55 90.59
f 30 240 165.59 3.22 0.62 102.15
g 30 240 165.59 4.83 0.71 117.11
h 30 240 165.59 3.22 0.62 102.15
beam 705.13 -400 -282052.4
1 30 40 400 400.00
2 30 40 600 266.67
3 30 40 600 266.67
4 30 40 600 266.67
5 30 40 600 266.67
6 30 40 600 266.67
7 30 40 300 533.33
axisy2
g.floor
column b h l kx ky
a 35 45 250 643.13 1063.1 1.6197 0.5856 376.61
b 35 45 250 643.13 1063.1 2.6995 0.6808 437.85
c 35 45 250 643.13 1063.1 2.1596 0.6394 411.21
d 35 45 250 643.13 1063.1 2.1596 0.6394 411.21
e 35 45 250 643.13 1063.1 2.1596 0.6394 411.21
f 35 45 250 643.13 1063.1 2.1596 0.6394 411.21
g 35 45 250 643.13 1063.1 3.2394 0.7137 459
h 35 45 250 643.13 1063.1 2.1596 0.6394 411.21
3329.5 0 0
g.beam
1 40 50 400 1041.7
2 40 50 600 694.44
3 40 50 600 694.44
4 40 50 600 694.44
5 40 50 600 694.44
6 40 50 600 694.44
7 40 50 300 1388.9
mezanine@3
column
a 30 300 132.47 3.9317 0.6628 87.804
b 40 300 418.67 2.0734 0.509 213.1
c 40 300 418.67 1.6587 0.4534 189.81
d 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.5445 0.4358 233.54
e 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.5445 0.4358 233.54
axisy3
g.floor
column b h l kx ky
a 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 1.62 0.59 376.61
b 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.70 0.68 437.85
c 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
d 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
e 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
f 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
g 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 3.24 0.71 459.00
h 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
3329.50 450 1498274.59
g.beam
1 40 50 400 1041.67
2 40 50 600 694.44
3 40 50 600 694.44
4 40 50 600 694.44
5 40 50 600 694.44
6 40 50 600 694.44
7 40 50 300 1388.89
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 110
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
mezanin@3
column
a 30 300 132.47 3.93 0.66 87.80
b 40 300 418.67 2.07 0.51 213.10
c 40 300 418.67 1.66 0.45 189.81
d 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.54 0.44 233.54
e 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.54 0.44 233.54
f 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.30 0.39 210.71
g 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.94 0.49 264.14
h 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.30 0.39 210.71
beam 1643.34 450 739504.27
1 0.00
2 0.00
3 0.00
4 30 40 600 266.67
5 0.00
6 0.00
7 0.00
mezanin@3.6
column
a 30 60 662.34 0.00 0.00 0.00
b 40 60 2093.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
c 40 60 2093.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
d 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.05 0.02 65.05
e 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.10 0.05 127.01
f 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.10 0.05 127.01
g 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.15 0.07 186.11
h 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.10 0.05 127.01
beam 632.20 450 284489.33
1 0.00
2 0.00
3 0.00
4 0.00
5 30 40 600 266.67
6 30 40 600 266.67
7 30 40 300 533.33
1st floor
column
a 30 240 165.59 1.21 0.38 62.35
b 40 240 523.33 0.64 0.24 126.41
c 40 240 523.33 0.51 0.20 106.26
d 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.40 0.17 111.20
e 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.60 0.23 154.02
f 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.80 0.28 190.74
g 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 1.19 0.37 250.46
h 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.80 0.28 190.74
beam 1192.18 450 536478.93
1 30 40 400 400.00
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 111
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
2 30 40 600 266.67
3 30 40 600 266.67
4 30 40 600 266.67
5 30 40 600 266.67
6 30 40 600 266.67
7 30 40 300 533.33
2nd floor
column
a 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.87 0.30 162.56
b 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
c 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
d 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
e 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
f 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.49 0.43 229.05
g 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
beam 1281.94 450 576872.37
1 30 40 600 266.67
2 30 40 600 266.67
3 30 40 600 266.67
4 30 40 600 266.67
5 30 40 600 266.67
6 30 40 300 533.33
3rd floor
column
a 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 0.74 0.27 81.20
b 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.83 0.29 157.30
c 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.83 0.29 157.30
d 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.83 0.29 157.30
e 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.83 0.29 157.30
f 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.25 0.38 205.76
g 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.19 0.37 111.71
beam 1027.89 450 462548.52
1 30 35 600 178.65
2 30 35 600 178.65
3 30 35 600 178.65
4 30 35 600 178.65
5 30 35 600 178.65
6 30 35 300 357.29
4th floor
column
a 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 0.60 0.23 68.83
b 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.67 0.25 133.98
c 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.67 0.25 133.98
d 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.67 0.25 133.98
e 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.67 0.25 133.98
f 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.65
g 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.19 0.37 111.97
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 112
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
beam 895.38 450 402922.03
1 30 35 600 178.65
2 30 35 600 178.65
3 30 35 600 178.65
4 30 35 600 178.65
5 30 35 600 178.65
6 30 35 300 357.29
5th floor
column
a 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.45 0.19 24.09
b 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
c 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
d 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
e 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
f 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 1.36 0.41 52.75
g 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
beam 280.12 450 126053.21
1 25 30 600 93.75
2 25 30 600 93.75
3 25 30 600 93.75
4 25 30 600 93.75
5 25 30 600 93.75
6 25 30 300 187.50
6thfloor
column
a 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.31 0.14 17.60
b 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
c 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
d 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
e 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
f 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.94 0.32 41.56
g 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
beam 214.16 450 96372.67
1 25 30 600 93.75
2 25 30 600 93.75
3 25 30 600 93.75
4 25 30 600 93.75
5 25 30 600 93.75
6 25 30 300 187.50
stair
column
a 25 30 170 229.78 330.88 0.80 0.28 65.46
b 25 30 170 229.78 330.88 0.80 0.28 65.46
beam 130.92 450 58913.60
1 30 35 600 178.65
axisy4
g.floor
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 113
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
column b h l kx ky
a 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 1.62 0.59 376.61
b 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.70 0.68 437.85
c 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
d 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
e 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
f 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
g 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 3.24 0.71 459.00
h 35 45 250 643.13 1063.13 2.16 0.64 411.21
3329.50 1050 3495974.04
g.beam
1 40 50 400 1041.67
2 40 50 600 694.44
3 40 50 600 694.44
4 40 50 600 694.44
5 40 50 600 694.44
6 40 50 600 694.44
7 40 50 300 1388.89
mezanin@3
column
a 30 300 132.47 5.44 0.73 96.87
b 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 2.24 0.53 283.24
c 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.79 0.47 253.37
d 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.79 0.47 253.37
e 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.54 0.44 233.54
f 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.30 0.39 210.71
g 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.94 0.49 264.14
h 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.30 0.39 210.71
beam 1805.93 1050 1896228.27
1 30 40 400 400.00
2 30 40 600 266.67
3 30 40 600 266.67
4 30 40 600 266.67
5 0.00
6 0.00
7 0.00
mezanin@3.6
column
a 30 60 662.34 0.30 0.13 86.88
b 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.12 0.06 156.91
c 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.10 0.05 127.01
d 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.10 0.05 127.01
e 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.10 0.05 127.01
f 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.10 0.05 127.01
g 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.15 0.07 186.11
h 35 45 60 2679.69 4429.69 0.10 0.05 127.01
beam 1064.97 1050 1118215.70
1 0.00
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 114
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
2 0.00
3 0.00
4 0.00
5 30 40 600 266.67
6 30 40 600 266.67
7 30 40 300 533.33
1st floor
column
a 30 240 165.59 1.21 0.38 62.35
b 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.50 0.20 133.46
c 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.40 0.17 111.20
d 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.40 0.17 111.20
e 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.60 0.23 154.02
f 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.80 0.28 190.74
g 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 1.19 0.37 250.46
h 35 45 240 669.92 1107.42 0.80 0.28 190.74
beam 1204.17 1050 1264378.50
1 30 40 400 400.00
2 30 40 600 266.67
3 30 40 600 266.67
4 30 40 600 266.67
5 30 40 600 266.67
6 30 40 600 266.67
7 30 40 300 533.33
2nd floor
column
a 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 0.87 0.30 162.56
b 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
c 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
d 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
e 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
f 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.49 0.43 229.05
g 35 45 300 535.94 885.94 1.00 0.33 178.07
beam 1281.94 1050 1346035.54
1 30 40 600 266.67
2 30 40 600 266.67
3 30 40 600 266.67
4 30 40 600 266.67
5 30 40 600 266.67
6 30 40 300 533.33
3rd floor
column
a 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 0.74 0.27 81.20
b 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.48 0.43 127.80
c 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.48 0.43 127.80
d 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.48 0.43 127.80
e 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.48 0.43 127.80
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 115
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
f 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 2.23 0.53 158.04
g 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.48 0.43 127.80
beam 878.25 1050 922163.23
1 30 35 600 178.65
2 30 35 600 178.65
3 30 35 600 178.65
4 30 35 600 178.65
5 30 35 600 178.65
6 30 35 300 357.29
4th floor
column
a 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 0.60 0.23 68.83
b 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.19 0.37 111.97
c 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.19 0.37 111.97
d 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.19 0.37 111.97
e 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.19 0.37 111.97
f 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.79 0.47 141.54
g 30 40 300 300.00 533.33 1.19 0.37 111.97
beam 770.22 1050 808728.55
1 30 35 600 178.65
2 30 35 600 178.65
3 30 35 600 178.65
4 30 35 600 178.65
5 30 35 600 178.65
6 30 35 300 357.29
5th floor
column
a 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.45 0.19 24.09
b 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
c 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
d 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
e 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
f 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 1.36 0.41 52.75
g 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.91 0.31 40.66
beam 280.12 1050 294124.16
1 25 30 600 93.75
2 25 30 600 93.75
3 25 30 600 93.75
4 25 30 600 93.75
5 25 30 600 93.75
6 25 30 300 187.50
6thfloor
column
a 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.31 0.14 17.60
b 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
c 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
d 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
e 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 116
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
f 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.94 0.32 41.56
g 25 30 300 130.21 187.50 0.63 0.24 31.00
beam 214.16 1050 224869.57
1 25 30 600 93.75
2 25 30 600 93.75
3 25 30 600 93.75
4 25 30 600 93.75
5 25 30 600 93.75
6 25 30 300 187.50
stair
column
a 25 30 170 229.78 330.88 0.80 0.28 65.46
b 25 30 170 229.78 330.88 0.80 0.28 65.46
beam 130.92 1050 137465.06
1 30 35 600 178.65
Xs
D xiy i
; Ys
D y
ix i
…………..Varginon’s theorem
D iy D ix
Axis x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ∑Dyi
gf 2830 2830.5 2830.5 2831 2249.67 2349.33 2249.47 2249.67 20420
mezanine@3 504.1 887.35 887.35 1222 1014.27 0 0 0.00 4515.3
mezanine@3.6 0 0 0 0 921.84 598.52 835.03 992.71 3348.1
first 425.6 530.18 530.18 846.2 734.16 527.8 668.46 745.55 5008.2
second 0 503.81 503.81 503.8 462.46 420.13 462.46 462.46 3318.9
third 0 342.59 342.59 342.6 342.59 342.59 342.593 342.59 2398.1
fourth 0 342.59 342.59 342.6 342.59 342.59 342.593 342.59 2398.1
fifth 0 179.28 179.28 232.4 232.04 232.04 232.04 232.04 1286.7
sixth 0 103.02 103.02 232.5 232.04 232.04 232.04 232.04 1134.2
roof 0 103.02 103.02 232.6 232.04 232.04 232.04 232.04 1134.2
stair 0 0 0 173 173.01 0 0 0.00 346.02
stair
Axis Dyi VI Qi
1 0.00 201.01 0.00
2 0.00 201.01 0.00
3 173.01 201.01 100.51
4 173.01 201.01 100.51
5 0.00 201.01 0.00
6 0.00 201.01 0.00
7 0.00 201.01 0.00
8 0.00 201.01 0.00
346.02
stair d-value
Axis Dxi VI Qi
Determination of eccentricity
level Xs Ys Xm Ym ex ey ed,x1 ed,x2 ed,y1 ed,y2
gf 13.63 4.19 13.2 4.7 0.47 -0.55 2.32 -1.38 0.47 -1.58
m1 8.024 4.61 5.3 9.4 2.73 -4.76 4.58 0.88 -3.74 -5.79
m2 26.51 2.98 21.6 5.2 4.86 -2.23 6.71 3.01 -1.20 -3.25
1st 16.41 4.66 12.6 5.5 3.85 -0.87 5.70 2.00 0.15 -1.90
2nd 17.06 5.27 16.1 5.4 0.95 -0.16 2.80 -0.90 0.87 -1.18
3rd 17.57 5.21 16.3 5.2 1.29 0.03 3.14 -0.56 1.05 -1.00
4th 17.57 5.21 16.3 5.2 1.29 0.03 3.14 -0.56 1.06 -0.99
5th 18.58 4.97 16.3 5.2 2.32 -0.22 4.17 0.47 0.81 -1.24
6th 20.32 4.50 16.5 5.2 3.81 -0.73 5.66 1.96 0.30 -1.75
roof 20.32 4.50 16.1 5.5 4.20 -1.00 6.05 2.35 0.02 -2.03
stair 15 7.50 15.0 7.5 0.00 0.00 1.85 -1.85 1.03 -1.02
( Dix )e y ,tot
ix 1 * yi note: since ex,tot can be ex1 or ex2 and ey,tot can be ey1or ey2 due to
Jr
( Diy )e x ,tot
iy 1 * xi accidental eccentricity, α y= αy1or αy2 and αx= αx1 or αx2.
Jr
Where Jr=Jx+Jy
J x ( Dix y i ) ( Dix y i2 ) ( Dix ) y s2
2
x i x s xi , y i y s yi
Axis –y1
Axis-y2
Axis-y3
Axis-y4
Axis –y5
In the Y-direction
Axis-x1
Axis-x2
Axis-x3
Axis-x4
Axis-x5
Axis-x6
Axis-x7
Axis-x8
Chapter 4
Beam and column analysis and design
4.1 Beam design and analysis for flexure
Beams are flexural members which are used to transfer the loads from slab to columns.
Basically beams should be designed for flexure (moment). Further more it is essential to
check and design the beam sections for torsion and shear. Our code recommends that beams
are not designed for axial forces.
In our case a particular beam axis is selected for design. The following out put data is
taken from3-D analysis of the frame using SAP2000.
Frame element forces
Frame loc V T M
552 0 -47.3 16.6 -54.8
M - - 117.3
4 -55.0 - -145.7
561 0 170 1.2 -256.8
M - 92.3
6 175.1 -264
570 0 -183.6 0 -278.6
M - 98.9
6 181.1 -276.3
579 0 58.8 1.8 -171.7
M - 136.8
6 56.4 -163.5
588 0 182.4 14.51 -280
M - 94.1
6 180.3 -268.7
597 0 179.3 15.9 -276.9
M - 96.4
6 174.6 -264.5
606 0 211.1 19.4 -265.9
M - 224.8
3 207.3 -273.6
MS
Using table 1a of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995:
I. for MR= -145.7 (moment at the support)
M 145.7
Km = = 55.79 < Km* so, the section is
b d 0.3 0.395
singly reinforced.
For Km =55.79 a corresponding value of Ks=4.62 is read from table 1a.
There fore area of reinforcing steel, As can be calculated from the formula
K *M 4.62 * 145.7
As s = =1721.18mm2
d 0.395
II. For ML=-54.8 (moment at the support)
M 54.8
Km = = 34.22 < Km*=57.83 so, the section is singly
b d 0.3 0.395
reinforced.
For Km =34.22 a corresponding value of Ks=4.09 is read from table 1a.
There fore area of reinforcing steel, As can be calculated from the formula
K *M 4.09 * 54.8
As s = =567.42mm2
d 0.395
be
160
290
300
L 4000
bw e 300 1100
For T section be 5 5
actual width (c / c 5000mm
There fore be=1100mm.
Using general design chart No1 of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995
D=395mm
M u ,s 117.3 * 10 6
us 0.06 ; for this value a corresponding Kx
f cd be d 2 11.33 * 1100 * 396 2
x
value is read from the general chart. i.e. K x 0.13 , this implies X=0.13*395=51.35.
d
0.8X=0.8*51.35=41.08 which is less than hf (the height of the flange) =160mm. the
section is a rectangular section having width be=1100mm.
M 117.3
Km = = 26.14 < Km*=57.83 so, the section is
b d 1.1 0.395
singly reinforced (no compression reinforcement is required).
For Km =26.14 a corresponding value of Ks=4.00 is read from table 1a.
Therefore, area of reinforcing steel, As can be calculated from the formula
K *M 4.00 * 117.3
As s = =1187.85mm2
d 0.395
2. Beam 561
ML MR MR= -256.8 MS= 92.3 ML=-264.0
MS
Using table 1a of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995:
I. for MR= -256.8 (moment at the support)
M 256.8
Km = = 74.07 > Km*=57.83
b d 0.3 0.395
so, the section is doubly reinforced.
M 264
Km = = 75.1> Km*=57.83 so, the section is doubly
b d 0.3 0.395
reinforced.
Km 75.1 d2 45
*
1 .3 for 0.11 using table 1a
Km 57.83 d 395
K S M 1.01 * 4.465 * 264
ρ=1.01 AS1 =3014mm2
d 0.395
K ' ' M 1.7 * 1.01 * 264
ρ’=1.01 AS 2 S =1148mm2
d 0.395
Ks=4.465
K’s=1.7
300
L 3000
bw e 300 900
For T section be 5 5
actual width (c / c 6000mm
There fore be=900mm.
Using general design chart No1 of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995
D=395mm
M u ,s 92.3 * 10 6
us 0.058 ; for this value a corresponding Kx
f cd be d 2 11.33 * 900 * 395 2
x
value is read from the general chart. i.e. K x 0.12 , this implies X=0.12*395=47.4.
d
0.8X=0.8*47.4=37.92which is less than hf (the height of the flange) =160mm.
the section is a rectangular section having width b e=900mm.
3. Beam 570
ML MR MR= -276.3 MS= 98.9 ML= -278.6
MS
Using table 1a of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995:
I. for ML= -276.3 (moment at the support)
M 278.6
Km = = 77.15 > Km*=57.83 so, the section
b d 0.3 0.395
is doubly reinforced.
Km 77.15 d 45
*
1.33 for 2 0.11 using table 1a
Km 57.83 d 395
K M 1.01 * 4.45 * 278.6
ρ=1.01 AS1 S =3170mm2
d 0.395
K ' ' M 1.8 * 1.01 * 278.6
ρ’=1.01 AS 2 S =1282mm2
d 0.395
Ks=4.45
K’s=1.8
II. For MR=-276.3 (moment at the support)
The reinforcements are the same as the support reinforcement above. i.e
AS1= 3170mm2
AS2 =1282mm2
III. For MS=98.9(moment at the span)
In this case the section should be checked whether it is a rectangular or a T section.
be
300
L 6000
bw e 300 1500
For T section be 5 5
actual width (c / c 6000mm
There fore be=900mm.
Using general design chart No1 of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995 d=395mm
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 145
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
M u ,s 98.9 * 10 6
us 0.037 ; for this value a corresponding Kx
f cd be d 2 11.33 * 1500 * 395 2
x
value is read from the general chart. i.e. K x 0.1 , this implies X=0.1*395=39.5.
d
0.8X=0.8*39.5=31.6 which is less than hf (the height of the flange) =160mm. the section
is a rectangular section having width be=1500mm.
M 98.9
Km = = 20.56< Km*=57.83 so, the section is
b d 1.5 0.395
singly reinforced (no compression reinforcement is required).
For Km =20.56 a corresponding value of Ks=3.98 is read from table 1a.
Therefore, area of reinforcing steel, As can be calculated from the formula
K *M 3.98 * 98.9
As s = =996.51mm2
d 0.395
4. Beam 579
ML MR MR= -163.5 MS= 136.8 ML=-171.7
MS
Using table 1a of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995:
I. for ML= -171.7 (moment at the support)
M 171.7
Km = = 60.6 > Km*=57.83 so, the section
b d 0.3 0.395
is doubly reinforced.
Km 60.6 d 45
*
1 .2 for 2 0.11 using table 1a
Km 57.83 d 395
K S M 1.015 * 4.54 * 171.7
ρ=1.015 AS1 =2003 mm2
d 0.395
K ' ' M 1.2 * 1.01 * 171.7
ρ’=1.01 AS 2 S =526.84 mm2
d 0.395
Ks=4.54
K’s=1.2
II. For MR=-163.5 (moment at the support)
The reinforcements are the same as the support reinforcement above. i.e
AS1= 3170mm2
AS2 =1282mm2
III. For MS=136.8(moment at the span)
In this case the section should be checked whether it is a rectangular or a T section.
be
160
290
300
L 6000
bw e 300 1500
For T section be 5 5
actual width (c / c 6000mm
There fore be=1500mm.
Using general design chart No1 of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995
D=395mm
M u ,s 136.8 * 10 6
us 0.05 ; for this value a corresponding Kx
f cd be d 2 11.33 * 1500 * 395 2
x
value is read from the general chart. i.e. K x 0.11 , this implies X=0.11*395=43.45
d
0.8X=0.8*43.45=34.76 which is less than hf (the height of the flange) =160mm. the
section is a rectangular section having width be=1500mm.
M 136.8
Km = = 24.2< Km*=57.83 so, the section is
b d 1.5 0.395
singly reinforced (no compression reinforcement is required).
For Km =24.2 a corresponding value of Ks=3.99 is read from table 1a.
Therefore area of reinforcing steel, As can be calculated from the formula
K *M 3.99 * 136.8
As s = =1382 mm2
d 0.395
5. Beam 588
ML MR MR= -268.7 MS= 94.1 ML=-280
MS
Using table 1a of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995:
I. for ML= -280 (moment at the support)
M 280
Km = = 77.34 > Km*=57.83 so, the section is
b d 0.3 0.395
doubly reinforced.
Km 77.34 d 45
*
1.34 for 2 0.11 using table 1a
Km 57.83 d 395
K S M 1.01 * 4.45 * 280
ρ=1.01 AS1 =3186 mm2
d 0.395
K ' ' M 1.8 * 1.01 * 280
ρ’=1.01 AS 2 S =1289 mm2
d 0.395
Ks=4.45
K’s=1.8
II. For MR=-268.7 (moment at the support)
The reinforcements are the same as the support reinforcement above. i.e
AS1= 3186mm2
AS2 =1289mm2
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 147
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
III. For MS=94.1(moment at the span)
In this case the section should be checked whether it is a rectangular or a T section.
be
300
L 6000
bw e 300 1500
For T section be 5 5
actual width (c / c 6000mm
There fore be=1500mm.
Using general design chart No1 of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995
D=395mm
M u ,s 94.1 * 10 6
us 0.04 ; for this value a corresponding Kx
f cd be d 2 11.33 * 1500 * 395 2
x
value is read from the general chart. i.e. K x 0.1 , this implies X=0.10*395=39.50
d
0.8X=0.8*39.50=31.6 which is less than hf (the height of the flange) =160mm. the
section is a rectangular section having width be=1500mm.
M 94.1
Km = = 20.56< Km*=57.83 so, the section is
b d 1.5 0.395
singly reinforced (no compression reinforcement is required).
For Km =24.2 a corresponding value of Ks=3.96 is read from table 1a.
Therefore area of reinforcing steel, As can be calculated from the formula
K *M 3.96 * 94.1
As s = =943 mm2
d 0.395
6. Beam 597
ML MR MR= -264.5 MS= 96.4 ML=-276.9
MS
Using table 1a of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995:
I. for ML= -276.9 (moment at the support)
M 276.9
Km = = 76.9 > Km*=57.83 so, the section
b d 0.3 0.395
is doubly reinforced.
Km 76.9 d2 45
*
1.33 for 0.11 using table 1a
Km 57.83 d 395
K S M 1.02 * 4.45 * 276.9
ρ=1.02 AS1 =3182mm2
d 0.395
K ' S ' M 1.8 * 1.06 * 276.9
ρ’=1.06 AS 2 =1337.5 mm2
d 0.395
Ks=4.45
K’s=1.8
II. for MR=-264.5 (moment at the support)
The reinforcements are the same as the support reinforcement above. i.e
AS1= 3182mm2
AS2 =1337.5mm2
III. for MS=96.4(moment at the span)
In this case the section should be checked whether it is a rectangular or a T section.
be
300
L 6000
bw e 300 1500
For T section be 5 5
actual width (c / c 6000mm
There fore be=1500mm.
Using general design chart No1 of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995
D=395mm
M u ,s 96.4 * 10 6
us 0.04 ; for this value a corresponding Kx
f cd be d 2 11.33 * 1500 * 395 2
x
value is read from the general chart. i.e. K x 0.1 , this implies X=0.11*395=39.50
d
0.8X=0.8*39.50=31.6 which is less than hf (the height of the flange) =160mm. the
section is a rectangular section having width be=1500mm.
M 96.4
Km = = 20.3< Km*=57.83 so, the section is
b d 1.5 0.395
singly reinforced (no compression reinforcement is required).
For Km =20.3 a corresponding value of Ks=3.97 is read from table 1a.
Therefore, area of reinforcing steel, As can be calculated from the formula
K *M 3.97 * 96.4
As s = =969 mm2
d 0.395
7. Beam 606
ML MR MR= -265.9 MS= 224.8 ML=-273.6
MS
300
L 3000
bw e 300 900
For T section be 5 5
actual width (c / c 6000mm
There fore be=900mm.
Using general design chart No1 of EBCS-2, part 2, 1995
D=395mm
M u ,s 224.8 * 10 6
us 0.24 ; for this value a corresponding Kx
f cd be d 2 11.33 * 900 * 395 2
x
value is read from the general chart. i.e. K x 0.2 , this implies X=0.20*395=79.00
d
1
t
2
VSD
V RD
1
TSD
TRD
1
V
2
TSD
TRD
1
VSD
V RD
Further the torsional and shear resistance of the concrete shall be
TC, com = βtcTC and VC,com = βvcVC in which
1
tc
2
VSD
VC
1
TSD
TC
1
tc 0.97
2
55
1 64 . 41
16.6
4.96
b) Shear
1
VC 0.25
2
16.6
1 4.96
55
64.1
Corrected values
TRd, com = βtTRd = 0.98*36.4= 35.67
VRd,com = βvVRd = 0.34*335.65=114.12
TC, com = βtcTC = 0.97*4.96=4.81
VC,com = βvcVC = 0.25*64.41=16.1
2. Frame 588
Design actions
Aef = (D-2d’)*(b-2d’)…….area of equivalent hollow section.
Aef = (450-2*35)(300-2*35)= 87.4*103
hef = def/5, def is the diameter of a largest circle that can be inscribed in the hollow
section.
hef = def/5 < A/U; A=450*300 = 13.5*104mm2 A/U= 900mm
U= 2*300+2*450= 1500mm
= (300-2*65) =230 < 900mm
fctd = 0.21*fck2/3 = 0.21*202/3 =1.031
γc 1.5
Vsd = 179.3KN
Tsd = 14.51KN-M
VRD = 0.25fcdbwd =0.25*11.33*300*395 = 335.65
TRD = 0.8fcdAefhef = 0.8*11.33*87.4*103*46=36.44
TC = 1.2fctdAefhef = 1.2*1.031*87.4*103*46 = 4.98
VC = 0.25fctdK1K2bwd = 0.25*1.031*1.1*1.205*300*395=40.5KN
Length of the beam, L=6m
VRD=335.65>179.3; no diagonal compression.
Reduction factors for section capacity of concrete when shear and torsion come at a time
are:
a) Torsion
1
t 0.98
2
179.3
1 335.65
36.4
14.51
b) Shear
1
V 0.76
2
14.51
1 36.4
179.3
335.65
1
tc 0.55
2
179.3
1 36.4
14.51
4.96
b) Shear
1
VC 0.83
2
14.51
1 4 . 96
40.5
179.3
Corrected values
TRd, com = βtTRd = 0.98*36.4= 35.67
VRd,com = βvVRd = 0.76*335.65=255
TC, com = βtcTC = 0.55*4.96=2.73
VC,com = βvcVC = 0.83*40.5=33.6
a) Shear reinforcement
b) Torsion
Longitudinal reinforcements
Uef = (D+d-4d)*2= (450+300-4*35)*2= 1360mm
T TC (14.51 2.73) * 10 6 * 1360
Asl sd * U ef 3
190mm 2
2 Aeff f yd 2(87.4 * 10 * 260.87)
Transverse bars(use 8)
U ef 1360
170mm
8 8
S 3
2 Aeff f yd Astr 2 * 87.4 *10 * 260.87 * 50.24 190mm
Tsd TC (16.6 4.81) *10 6
Use 8 c/c 170mm
3. Frame 597
Design actions
Aef = (D-2d’)*(b-2d’)…….area of equivalent hollow section.
Aef = (450-2*35)(300-2*35)= 87.4*103
hef = def/5, def is the diameter of a largest circle that can be inscribed in the hollow
section.
hef = def/5 < A/U; A=450*300 = 13.5*104mm2 A/U= 900mm
U= 2*300+2*450= 1500mm
= (300-2*65) =230 < 900mm
fctd = 0.21*fck2/3 = 0.21*202/3 =1.031
γc 1.5
Vsd = 179.3KN
Tsd = 15.9KN-M
VRD = 0.25fcdbwd =0.25*11.33*300*395 = 335.65
TRD = 0.8fcdAefhef = 0.8*11.33*87.4*103*46=36.44
TC = 1.2fctdAefhef = 1.2*1.031*87.4*103*46 = 4.98
VC = 0.25fctdK1K2bwd = 0.25*1.031*2*1.205*300*395=40.5KN
Length of the beam, L=6m
VRD=335.65>179.3; no diagonal compression.
Reduction factors for section capacity of concrete when shear and torsion come at a time
are:
a) Torsion
1
t 0.974
2
179.3
1 335.65
36.4
15.9
b) Shear
1
V 0.77
2
15.9
1 36.4
179.3
335.65
Reduction factor for shear resistance of concrete
a) Torsion
1
tc 0.795
2
179.3
1 73 . 61
15.9
4.98
b) Shear
1
VC 0.37
2
15.9
1 4.98
179.3
73.61
Corrected values
TRd, com = βtTRd = 0.974*36.4= 35.49
VRd,com = βvVRd = 0.77*335.65=258.45
TC, com = βtcTC = 0.795*4.96=3.96
VC,com = βvcVC = 0.37*73.61=27.24
a) Shear reinforcement
4.3.2 Torsion
Longitudinal reinforcements
Uef = (D+d-4d)*2= (450+300-4*35)*2= 1360mm
Tsd TC (15.9 3.96) * 10 6 * 1360
Asl * U ef 3
460mm 2
2 Aeff f yd 2(87.4 * 10 * 260.87)
Transverse bars(use 6)
U ef 1360
170mm
8 8
S 3
2 Aeff f yd Astr 2 * 87.4 * 10 * 260.87 * 28.26 190mm
Tsd TC (15.9 3.96) * 10 6
Use 6 c/c 190mm.
4. Frame 606
Design actions
Aef = (D-2d’)*(b-2d’)…….area of equivalent hollow section.
Aef = (450-2*35)(300-2*35)= 87.4*103
hef = def/5, def is the diameter of a largest circle that can be inscribed in the hollow
section.
hef = def/5 < A/U; A=450*300 = 13.5*104mm2 A/U= 900mm
U= 2*300+2*450= 1500mm
= (300-2*65) =230 < 900mm
fctd = 0.21*fck2/3 = 0.21*202/3 =1.031
γc 1.5
Vsd = 211.1KN
Tsd = 19.4KN-M
VRD = 0.25fcdbwd =0.25*11.33*300*395 = 335.65
TRD = 0.8fcdAefhef = 0.8*11.33*87.4*103*46=36.44
TC = 1.2fctdAefhef = 1.2*1.031*87.4*103*46 = 4.98
VC = 0.25fctdK1K2bwd = 0.25*1.205*1.95*1.205*300*395=71.77KN
Length of the beam, L=6m
VRD=335.65>211.1; no diagonal compression.
a) Torsion
1
t 0.95
2
211.1
1 335 . 65
36.4
19.4
b) Shear
1
V 0.76
2
19.4
1 36 . 4
211.1
335.65
Reduction factor for shear resistance of concrete
a) Torsion
1
tc 0 .8
2
211.1
1 71.77
19.4
4.98
b) Shear
1
VC 0 .6
2
19.4
1 4 . 98
211.1
71.77
Corrected values
TRd, com = βtTRd = 0.95*36.44= 34.62
VRd,com = βvVRd = 0.76*335.65=255
TC, com = βtcTC = 0.8*4.98=4.00
VC,com = βvcVC = 0.6*71.77=43.10
a) Shear reinforcement
5. Frame 561
Design actions
Aef = (D-2d’)*(b-2d’)…….area of equivalent hollow section.
Aef = (450-2*35)(300-2*35)= 87.4*103
hef = def/5, def is the diameter of a largest circle that can be inscribed in the hollow
section.
hef = def/5 < A/U; A=450*300 = 13.5*104mm2 A/U= 900mm
U= 2*300+2*450= 1500mm
= (300-2*65) =230 < 900mm
fctd = 0.21*fck2/3 = 0.21*202/3 =1.031
γc 1.5
Vsd = 175.1KN
Tsd = 1.2KN-M
VRD = 0.25fcdbwd =0.25*11.33*300*395 = 335.65
TRD = 0.8fcdAefhef = 0.8*11.33*87.4*103*46=36.44
TC = 1.2fctdAefhef = 1.2*1.031*87.4*103*46 = 4.98
VC = 0.25fctdK1K2bwd = 0.25*1.031*2*1.205*300*395=73.61KN
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 161
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
Length of the beam, L=6m
VRD=335.65>175.1; no diagonal compression.
No Reduction factors for section capacity of concrete and shear resistance of concrete, as
the design torsion is small.
6. Frame 570
Design actions
Aef = (D-2d’)*(b-2d’)…….area of equivalent hollow section.
Aef = (450-2*35)(300-2*35)= 87.4*103
hef = def/5, def is the diameter of a largest circle that can be inscribed in the hollow
section.
hef = def/5 < A/U; A=450*300 = 13.5*104mm2 A/U= 900mm
U= 2*300+2*450= 1500mm
= (300-2*65) =230 < 900mm
fctd = 0.21*fck2/3 = 0.21*202/3 =1.031
γc 1.5
Vsd = 211.1KN
Tsd = 19.4KN-M
VRD = 0.25fcdbwd =0.25*11.33*300*395 = 335.65
TRD = 0.8fcdAefhef = 0.8*11.33*87.4*103*46=36.44
TC = 1.2fctdAefhef = 1.2*1.031*87.4*103*46 = 4.98
VC = 0.25fctdK1K2bwd = 0.25*1.205*1.95*1.205*300*395=71.77KN
Length of the beam, L=6m
VRD=335.65>211.1; no diagonal compression.
1
tc 0 .8
2
211.1
1 71.77
19.4
4.98
b) Shear
1
VC 0 .6
2
19.4
1 4.98
211.1
71.77
Corrected values
TRd, com = βtTRd = 0.95*36.44= 34.62
VRd,com = βvVRd = 0.76*335.65=255
TC, com = βtcTC = 0.8*4.98=4.00
VC,com = βvcVC = 0.6*71.77=43.10
a) Shear reinforcement
7. Frame 579
Design actions
Aef = (D-2d’)*(b-2d’)…….area of equivalent hollow section.
Aef = (450-2*35)(300-2*35)= 87.4*103
hef = def/5, def is the diameter of a largest circle that can be inscribed in the hollow
section.
hef = def/5 < A/U; A=450*300 = 13.5*104mm2 A/U= 900mm
U= 2*300+2*450= 1500mm
= (300-2*65) =230 < 900mm
fctd = 0.21*fck2/3 = 0.21*202/3 =1.031
γc 1.5
Vsd = 55KN
Tsd = 16.6KN-M
VRD = 0.25fcdbwd =0.25*11.33*300*395 = 335.65
TRD = 0.8fcdAefhef = 0.8*11.33*87.4*103*46=36.44
TC = 1.2fctdAefhef = 1.2*1.031*87.4*103*46 = 4.98
VC = 0.25fctdK1K2bwd = 0.25*1.031*1.75*1.205*300*395=64.41KN
Mekelle university department of civil engineering May 18,2006 164
Structural design of a G+6 building @ Mekelle as senior project
Length of the beam, L=4m
VRD=335.65>55; no diagonal compression.
Reduction factors for section capacity of concrete when shear and torsion come at a time
are:
a) Torsion
1
t 0.98
2
55
1 335.65
36.4
16.6
b) Shear
1
V 0.34
2
16 . 6
1 36.4
55
335.65
Reduction factor for shear resistance of concrete
a) Torsion
1
tc 0.97
2
55
1 64 . 41
16.6
4.96
b) Shear
1
VC 0.25
2
16.6
1 4.96
55
64.1
Corrected values
TRd, com = βtTRd = 0.98*36.4= 35.67
VRd,com = βvVRd = 0.34*335.65=114.12
TC, com = βtcTC = 0.97*4.96=4.81
VC,com = βvcVC = 0.25*64.41=16.1
The anchorage length of bars that are bent up as shear reinforcement shall be at least
equal to 1.3*Lb,net in tensions and 0.7* Lb,net in zones subjected to compression.
Beam Reinforcement As,cal(mm2) As,eff(mm2) Ф (mm2) Lb,net=31.6 *As,cal/As,eff(mm)
tension 1721.18 1808 24 720
compression 341 628 20 345
552
tension 2956.3 3164 24 710
beam
1 30 25 600 56250 93.75 39062.5 65.10417
2 30 25 600 56250 93.75 39062.5 65.10417
3 30 25 600 56250 93.75 39062.5 65.10417
4 30 25 450 56250 125 39062.5 86.80556
5 30 25 600 56250 93.75 39062.5 65.10417
6 30 25 450 56250 125 39062.5 86.80556
7 30 25 600 56250 93.75 39062.5 65.10417
8 30 25 600 56250 93.75 39062.5 65.10417
column
A 30 25 300 56250 187.5 39062.5 130.2083
C 30 25 300 56250 187.5 39062.5 130.2083
o Sway mode
Le 7.5 4( 1 2 ) 1.6 1 2
1.15
L 7 .5 1 2
Le
Or conservatively 1 0.8 m 1.15
L
K Kc
1 1
K 11 K 12
K Kc
2 2
K 21 K 22
2
m 1
2
Our assumption is that the columns are sway mode and this will be proved in the next pages.
The calculations are tabulated below.
no
frame h(mm) b(mm) IC*10^6 bars dia.bar Is Eie Ncr*10^6 Nsd*10^6 ratio condition
non-
109 550 550 7626 12 28 6E+08 1.1E+14 4E+07 65.274 4.6866 0.07 sway
110 550 4492 12 28 6E+08 1.1E+14 2E+07 5.0829 3.6283 0.71 sway
112 500 450 4688 10 28 3E+08 6.2E+13 2E+07 12.886 3.1405 0.24 sway
113 500 450 4688 10 24 2E+08 4.6E+13 2E+07 7.7243 3.3636 0.44 sway
114 450 400 3038 8 24 1E+08 2.9E+13 2E+07 5.3339 2.5282 0.47 sway
115 450 400 3038 8 24 1E+08 2.9E+13 2E+07 8.4537 1.6846 0.2 sway
116 300 250 562.5 6 20 3E+07 5.9E+12 3E+06 2.7352 0.832 0.3 sway
non-
117 300 250 562.5 6 20 3E+07 5.9E+12 3E+06 3.2918 0.0925 0.03 sway
revise columns 109 &117
frame
109 Lye= 1835 >0.7*2000=1400
frame
117 Ley= 3746 >0.7*3000=2100
4.5.5 Check for long or short column condition and consideration of the
second order effects.
frame 2nd order
frame Ac(mm2) Nsd(N) v λ λ<25 λcomputed type effect
sway frames
110 2E+05 4E+06 1.348 12.92 25 107.170527 Long considered
112 2E+05 3E+06 1.232 13.51 25 53.22026382 Long considered
113 2E+05 3E+06 1.319 13.06 25 58.91223233 Long considered
114 2E+05 3E+06 1.24 13.47 25 56.36989359 Long considered
115 2E+05 2E+06 0.826 16.5 25 101.9479819 Long considered
116 75000 8E+05 0.979 15.16 25 80.8708697 Long considered
2nd order
Total eccentricity
total eccentricity editor and moments
c-1) case -1 for comb-1
Nsd*10^ ed,tot ed,tot
frame eoy eox 6 ea x y Mdx Mdy
109 0.40 1.04 4.69 20.00 21.04 20.40 95.61 98.59
110 1.38 2.48 3.63 49.12 51.60 50.50 183.23 187.23
112 0.46 5.76 3.14 23.05 28.80 23.51 73.83 90.45
113 0.58 9.69 3.36 25.51 35.20 26.09 87.75 118.38
114 0.46 29.51 2.53 24.41 53.91 24.87 62.88 136.31
115 0.35 15.45 1.68 20.00 35.45 20.35 34.28 59.71
116 2.36 33.97 0.83 20.00 53.97 22.36 18.60 44.90
117 15.73 141.12 0.09 20.00 161.12 35.73 3.31 14.90
c-2) case -2 worst case
ed,tot ed,tot
frame eoy eox Nsd ea x y Mdx Mdy
109 23.68 17.63 3.52 20.00 37.63 43.68 153.65 132.38
110 1.17 37.92 3.44 49.12 87.04 50.29 172.83 299.11
112 5.25 39.24 3.10 23.05 62.29 28.30 87.63 192.88
113 9.03 56.45 2.52 25.51 81.96 34.54 86.99 206.46
114 16.11 71.89 1.89 24.41 96.30 40.52 76.71 182.34
115 14.56 59.39 1.26 20.00 79.39 34.56 43.66 100.29
116 52.18 94.97 0.62 20.00 114.97 72.18 44.92 71.54
150.1
117 8 320.69 0.07 20.00 340.69 170.18 12.22 24.46
CHAPTER 5
5. Foundation design
5.1 Loading
This is obtained from sap 2000 analysis result.
Two combinations are considered.
o Comb-1
Fx = 2.14KN M x= 2.29KNm
F y = 5.18KN M y= 3.60KNm
P = 4686.6KN
o Comb-2
Fx = 91.75KN M x= 3.00KNm
Fy = 3.20KN My = 156.70KNm
P= 3517.85KN
Material data
Concrete C-25
Steel s-300
Soil data
The soil where the structure is to be constructed is of weathered rock type and
from EBCS-7, 1995 the design bearing resistance is given as 1400KPa.
σs =1400KPa
Taking a factor of safety 1.5,
σal = 933.33KPa
B’
b b is the dimension of the
L’ footing pad
B’ is the footing column width
L’ is the footing column height
σs =P(1+ 6ea/a+6eb/b)/(a*b)
Where ea= My/P and eb=Mx/P
in our case B’=L’=550mm and we used a/b=1.50 usually used ratio.
ea= My/P =3.60/4686.6=0.0008
eb=Mx/P =2.29/4686.6=0.0005
933.33=4686.6(1+ 6*0.0008/b+6*0.0005/b)/b2
Using trial and error procedure
b =2.244m
Use b=2.3m
We check these values for maximum and minimum stresses.
σmax = 4686.6(1+ 6*0.0008/2.3+6*0.0005/2.3)/2.32
= 887.276< 933.33 ok!
min = 4686.6(1- 6*0.0008/(1.5*1.6)-6*0.0005/1.6)/(2.32)
=882.7 >0 ok!
B) Design for comb-4
σs =P(1+ 6ea/a+6eb/b)/(a*b)
Where ea= My/P and eb=Mx/P
in our case B’=L’=550mm and we used a/b=1.50 usually used ratio.
ea= My/P =156.7/3517.85=0.045m
eb=Mx/P =3.20/3517.85=0.001m
Using these data:
933.33=3517.85(1+ 6*0.045/b+6*0.001/b)/b2
Using trial and error procedure
b =2.067m
However this is less than the above computed values for comb-1. So the governing condition
for proportioning is comb-1 loading.
So we use b=2.30m
d + 0.55
d/2
b =2.30m
P=4686.50KN
882.7
887.27
But Up<Ucp
Pp=4686.6-(0.55+d)2 *885.135 < 567.34 Kpa
(0.55+d)*4*d
Solving for d by trial and error procedure d>0.84
Then D=d+cover
=0.84+.05
=0.90m
Use D=0.90m and d=0.85m
For comb-4
d + 0.55
d/2
b =2.30m
P=3517.85KN
713.43
930.27
0.55m b =2.30m
d
1 1
b =2.30m
2
P=4686.6KN
882.7
887.27
Section 1-1
Acting punching shear stress
Vp =2.3*(2.3/2-0.55/2-.85) * σ’
Where σ’= (2.3-2.3*.5-0.55*.5-0.85)/2.3*(887.27-882.7)+882.7
=882.75
Vp=50.76KPa
Resistance
Ucw=0.3fctd *(1+50ρ) where the parameters are as
defined above
=386.10Kpa
Hence Vp < Ucp ok! The section is enough.
Section 2-2
The section is not within the area.
For comb-4 2
0.55
b =2.30m
2
3517.85KN
σ’
σ’
713.43
930.9
Section 1-1
Section 2-2
The section is out of the zone.
5.4 Reinforcement
The design moments are obtained at the face of the columns.
for comb-4
713.43 930.9
134.74
82.73
Design moments
For comb-1
M=2.83 * 0.875*0.875/2+1.74*0.875*0.5*2/3+882.7*0.875*0.875 /2
=339.5KNm
For comb-4
M=134.74 * 0.875*0.875/2+82.73*0.875*0.5*2/3+713.43*0.875*0.875 /2
=338.77KNm
So, the design moment is Md = 339.5KNm
2
PB Apply this percentage of steel in zone B
a 1
b
PA=1-PB percentage of steel in zone A
a
Since a = b; PA=PB;, there is no zoning of reinforcements.
Provide uniform reinforcemet in both directions.
Reference materials