Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
J.A. Larrauri, B. Borroto: Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Alimenticia, Carretera Guatao, Km 3.5,
Lisa 19200, Ciudad Habana (Cuba)
P. Rupérez, F. Saura-Calixto: Departamento de Metabolismo y Nutrición, Instituto del Frı́o, C.S.I.C., Ciudad
Universitaria s/n, 28040-Madrid (Spain)
(Received July 21, 1995; accepted January 19, 1996)
In this study, preparation and characterization of mango peel dietary fibre were investigated. Fresh mango peels, obtained as a
byproduct of syrup production, were successively wet-milled, washed with water and dried. A peel particle size of 15 mm in wet
milling and a washing time of 5 min were found to remove soluble sugars and to increase total polyphenols and soluble dietary
fibre content. Mango peel dietary fibre contained high amounts of total extractable polyphenols (70 g/kg) and soluble dietary fibre
(281 g/kg) and had a high water-holding capacity (11.4 g/g dry matter). These characteristics indicated that mango peel is a good
source of tropical fruit fibre.
729
lwt/vol. 29 (1996) No. 8
Chemical analysis was 1:120 and the carrier gas (nitrogen) pressure was 9
Residual moisture was determined by drying to con- psi.
stant weight at 105 °C. Uronic acids were estimated by difference between
SDF (DNS method) and total neutral sugars (GLC
Soluble sugars. In order to avoid loss of hemicelluloses method) because of a failure in the usual spectrophoto-
and pectins which are soluble in 800 mL/L ethanol (7), metric methods, probably related to the high TEP
sugars were extracted with ethanol (960 mL/L) in a content of MPDF.
shaking water-bath at 50 °C for 30 min. The supernatant
was analysed using the anthrone-thiourea reagent (8). Minerals. A dry sample was incinerated in a furnace at
525 °C for 8 h. The residue was dissolved in HNO3 with
Total extractable polyphenols (TEP). The powdered 50 g/L of LaCl3 to determine Ca, Mg, K, Na, Fe, Cu, Mn
sample (500 mg) was extracted sequentially with 40 mL and Zn in a Perkin Elmer model 5100 PC atomic
methanol:water (50:50, v/v) and 40 mL acetone:water spectrophotometer.
(70:30, v/v) at room temperature for 60 min. Super-
natants from these extractions were combined and Protein. Total nitrogen was determined in MPDF as
made up to 100 mL with distilled water. TEP were well as in the KL residue (resistant protein) by the
spectrophotometrically assayed by the Folin-Ciocalteau Kjeldahl method and protein was calculated as
method using tannic acid as a standard (9). Lemon and N 3 6.25.
apple fibres (Indulérida, S.A.) were also analysed, in
order to compare our results with commercial fruit Oil. Oil was extracted from 1 g of dry sample with 40
fibres. mL of ethyl ether in a Soxtec system (Tecator).
Condensed tannins (CT). The residue obtained from Water- and oil-holding capacity (WHC, OHC)
TEP extraction was treated with 40 mL of 50 mL/L HCl Twenty-five millilitres of distilled water or commercial
in N-butanol in a water-bath at 100 °C for 3 h. The olive oil were added to 250 mg of dry sample, stirred
supernatant was made up to 50 mL with the same and left at room temperature for 1 h. After centrifuga-
solvent and the absorbance was measured at 555 nm tion, the residue was weighed and WHC and OHC
(10). Carob pod condensed tannins (Nestlé, Ltd.) were calculated as g water or oil per g of dry sample,
selected as a standard according to a previous spectral respectively (16).
report (11).
730
lwt/vol. 29 (1996) No. 8
1 70.0a 1 281.0a 13
2 54.0b 1 254.0b 14
3 54.0b 1 217.0c 13
4 44.0c 1 237.0c 13
a See Table 1 for treatments.
b Different letters in each row indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Mean (x̄) and standard deviation (sx) of three determinations.
(Table 3). Particle size was the only variable sig- WHC and OHC values are useful as emulsifiers for
nificantly affecting the yield of MPDF (Table 4). meat products and thickening or bodying agents (23).
The confidence intervals obtained for the character- TEP and SDF were significantly influenced by the
istics which did not exhibit significant differences with treatment followed for MPDF preparation (Table 1).
the treatment used are shown in Table 2. Content of Treatment 1 resulted in the highest TEP and SDF
total soluble sugars was low and independent of the values, treatment 4 in the lowest (Table 3). Large
time of washing and particle size used, which shows the particle size with the lower washing time (treatment 1)
efficiency of the washing procedure, yielding a final was a limiting factor which removed only soluble sugars
product with a low caloric value. Accordingly, no and small amounts of TEP and SDF. Smaller particle
significant differences in citrus husks of different sizes with longer washing times made it easier to
particle size have been reported when washed with hot remove interesting fibre-associated compounds. Values
water ( ≥ 80 °C) (17). of TEP and SDF shown in Table 3 are higher than for
Blanching is an essential procedure to inactivate other fibres, such as apple (3 and 130 g/kg, respectively)
enzymes and protect food products from enzyme and lemon (7 and 250 g/kg, respectively). Particle size
catalysed reactions. A 22% removal of soluble sugar affected the yield of MPDF. The bigger the particle size
was obtained in blanched raw mango fruit pieces (5). In in milling of fresh mango peel, the higher the final
this work, we have performed an additional hot water recovery (Table 4), with small insoluble solid losses in
washing, with removal of 87% of the soluble sugars the washing steps, mainly pressing. A similar behaviour
initially present in fresh mango peel. Condensed was reported in citrus husks (24). These values are low
tannins, or nonextractable polyphenols, and IDF were compared to citrus fibre yield (6 to 8%), due to a higher
not washed out by hot water. Therefore, their values did amount of pulp in mango peel.
not change significantly with the treatments. The IDF Considering these results, treatment 1 can be selected
content (434 g/kg) was in the same order as that found as the most appropriate to obtain MPDF. This proce-
in commercial apple and lemon dietary fibre prepara- dure yielded the highest recovery of a fibre, low in
tions: 430 to 500 g/kg and 300 to 450 g/kg, soluble sugars and with the highest TEP and SDF
respectively. content as compared to the other studied treatments.
MPDF held 11 g water per g dry matter. This value was No data on MPDF were found in the literature. Its
higher than in some commercial fibres (18–20). This composition is shown in Tables 5 and 6. The high fibre
may be due to its high soluble fibre and/or pectic content, especially SDF (281 g/kg), should be noticed.
substance content (21), although WHC values are Mango peel is one of the fruit materials presenting the
highly method-dependent. OHC was around four times highest proportion of SDF; similar contents only occur
lower than WHC. This value agreed with the reported in citrus fruits. Arabinose, galactose and glucose were
OHC values of citrus husk: 4 to 5 g oil/g dry matter (22). the majority of neutral sugars in both soluble and
It has been shown that other fruit fibres with similar insoluble MPDF (Table 6). This sugar composition is
characteristic of high soluble fibre fruits and is in
Table 4 Changes in the yield of mango peel dietary fibre agreement with previous results reported for mango
(MPDF) with peel particle size fruit (25) and citrus peel (26).
Yield (%)a b Uronic acid content in soluble and insoluble dietary
Particle size
(mm) x̄ sx fibre, estimated by difference, were 65 and 68 g/kg,
respectively. This result agrees with the total uronic acid
8 4.4a 0.1 value (130 g/kg) reported in the same raw material
15 4.9b 0.1
(6).
Mean (x̄) and standard deviation (sx) of three determinations. Polyphenols and resistant protein are compounds
a Different letters mean significant differences (P < 0.05).
b Yield was calculated as follows:
associated with dietary fibre. As mentioned above,
citrus and mango have comparable dietary fibre values,
MPDF obtained
×100 though the high amount of TEP (70 g/kg) is a
Mango peel
peculiarity of mango peel.
731
lwt/vol. 29 (1996) No. 8
Table 5 Composition of mango peel dietary fibre obtained Table 7 Mineral content of mango peel dietary fibre
with treatment 1
Concentration (mg/kg)a
Dry weight (g/kg)c
Minerals x̄ sx
Componentc x̄ sx
Ca 4445 405
Soluble dietary fibre K 2910 374
Neutral sugar (GLC)a 216 17 Mg 950 47
Neutral sugars+uronic acids (DNS)b 281 13 Na 638 45
Fe 175 11
Insoluble dietary fibre Zn 32.5 5
Neutral sugar (GLC)a 128 4 aMean value (x̄) and standard deviation of three
Neutral sugars+uronic acids (DNS)b 196 19 determinations.
Klason lignin 238 29
Ashes 28.5 2
Protein Acknowledgements
Total 52.5 4
Resistant 38.9 5 J.A.L. wishes to thank the Ministerio Español de
Educación y Ciencia for the concession of a Scholarship
Oil 25 2
for Foreign Technologist, and the sponsor of Proyecto
a GLC = determined by gas liquid chromatography analysis. de Cooperación Iberoamericano: ‘Nuevos tipos de
b DNS = determined by dinitrosalicylic acid method. fibras dietéticas de alta calidad. Obtención en planta
c Mean value (x̄) and standard deviation (s ) of three
x piloto y caracterización’.
determinations.
732
lwt/vol. 29 (1996) No. 8
13 ENGLYST, H. N. AND HUDSON, G. J. Colorimetric method 22 KESTERSON, J. W. AND BRADDOCK. R. J. Processing and
for routine measurement of dietary fibre as non-starch potential uses for dried juice sacs. Food Technology, 27(2),
polysaccharides. A comparison with gas–liquid chroma- 50–54 (1973)
tography. Food Chemistry, 24, 63–76 (1987) 23 FERGUSON, R. R. AND FOX, K. Dietary citrus fibres.
14 SELVENDRAN, R. R., MARCH, J. F. AND RING, S. G. Determi- Transactions of the ASME Citrus Engineering Conference,
nation of aldoses and uronic acid content of vegetable 24, 23–26. Winterhaven, Fla (1978).
fibre. Analytical Biochemistry, 96, 282–292 (1979) 24 FERNANDEZ, M., SEVILLANO, E., LARRAURI, J. A.,
15 RUPEREZ, P. AND LEAL, J. A. Age-related changes in BORROTO, B., NUÑEZ, M. AND LOPEZ, B. Influencia de las
Penicillium erythromellis cell wall. Transactions of the condiciones de la obtención de fibra dietética de toronja.
British Mycological Society, 86, 279–285 (1986) Alimentaria, 260, 19–21 (1995)
16 MONGEAU, R. AND BRASSARD, M. Insoluble dietary fiber 25 ENGLYST, H. N., BINGHAM, S. A., RUNSWICH, S. A., COL-
from breakfast cereals and brans; bile salt binding and LINSON , E. AND CUMMINGS, J. H. Dietary fibre (non-starch
water holding capacity in relation to particle size. Cereal polysaccharides) in fruit, vegetables and nuts. Journal of
Chemistry, 56, 413–417 (1982) Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1, 247–286 (1988)
17 LARRAURI, J. A., BORROTO, B. AND FERNANDEZ, C. Obten- 26 MAÑAS, E. Análisis de fibra alimentaria. Fuentes de error
ción de polvo con fines nutricionales a partir de cáscara de en los métodos actuales y propuesta de nueva
mandarinas (Citrus nobilis cv Dancy). Alimentos, 19(1), metodologı́a. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de
29–33 (1994) Madrid, España (1992)
18 ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAN CO. The ADM Ready Reference 27 BRAVO, L., ABIA, R. AND SAURA-CALIXTO, F. Polyphenols
Fiber Guide. Illinois, U.S.A.: Technical Bulletin. (1992) as dietary fibre associated compounds. Comparative study
19 WILLIAMSON FOOD INGREDIENTS. To be the best, choose the on in vivo and in vitro properties. Journal of Agricultural
best. Kentucky, U.S.A.: Technical Bulletin. (1991) and Food Chemistry, 42, 1481–1487 (1994)
20 AUFFRET, A., GUILLON, F., RALET, M. C. AND THIBAULT, 28 YEN, G. C. AND CHEN, H. Y. Antioxidant activity of various
J. F. Effect of grinding and experimental conditions on the tea extracts in relation to their antimutagenicity. Journal
measurement on hydration properties of dietary fibres. of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 43(1), 27–32 (1995)
Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie, 27, 166–172 29 LEE, Y., HOWARD, L. R. AND VILLALON, B. Flavonoids and
(1994) antioxidant activity of Fresh pepper (Capsicum annuum)
21 MICHEL, F., THIBAULT, J. F., BARRY, J. L. AND BAYNOST, R. cultivars. Journal of Food Science, 60, 473–476 (1995)
Preparation and characterization of dietary fibre from
sugar beet pulp. Journal of the Science of Food and
Agriculture, 42, 77–85 (1988)
733