Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract: The paper researches about the impact of radiation parameter and chemical reaction of unsteady
MHD flow of a viscoelastic fluid in a porous medium with oscillating temperature. The flow is assumed to be
incompressible electrically conducting and transmitting viscoelastic fluid in the presence of uniform magnetic
field. A uniform magnetic field is applied normal to the plate. The velocity, temperature and concentration
distributions are derived, solved analytically and their profiles for various physical parameters are appeared
through graphs. The coefficient of Skin friction, Nusselt number and Sherwood number are determined.
3777
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org
produced magnetic field is insignificant. Likewise it By using the Rosseland approximation, the
is supposed that there is no applied voltage, so that radioactive flux vector qᵣ can be written as:
the electric field is vanished. The plate is assumed to =
be electrically non-conducting with uniform
magnetic field, B0 is applied normal to the plate and where and are respectively the Stefan-
the entire region of the fluid are at same temperature Boltzmann constant and the mean absorption
T∞ and concentration C∞. The governing equation coefficient. Assume that the temperature difference
for this investigation is based on the balance of within the flow is sufficiently small such that
linear momentum energy. All the fluid properties are may be expressed as linear function of the
considered to be constant except the influence of the temperature. This is accomplished by expanding in a
density variation caused by the temperature changes Taylor series about the free stream temperature
in the body force term. Taking into consideration and neglecting higher order terms, thus
the assumption made above the flow field is
governed by the following set of equations. (6)
The governing equations for the momentum, energy In view of eq. (5) and (6), eq. (3) reduces to:
and concentration are as follows:
+v = + (7)
+v =υ – k1 –σ + gβ ( –
+ v = D + D1 K′c ( – ∞)
Substituting the dimensionless variables in eq.(10)
(4) into eq. (3), eq.(4), eq.(6) and eq. (9) and dropping
the bars
The boundary conditions for the problem are:
3778
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org
Eq. (9) and eq. (10) can be obtained into a single U₁(0) =0, ₁ = C₁(0) = 1 at ƞ→0
equation by introducing the complex velocity.
U₁(∞) → 0, ₁ → 0, C₁(∞) → 0 as ƞ → ∞
U=u(ƞ,t)+iω(ƞ,t) (14)
(26)
where i = √
where the primes represents differentiation with
respect to η.
Thus,
Solving eq. (20) to eq. (25) subject to the boundary
+ = – – – + Gr + conditions eq. (26) substituting the obtained
GcC (15) solutions into eq. (17) to eq. (19) respectively.
U(η,t) = [ + + ]+
U(0,t) = 0, = eint , C(0,t) = eint at ƞ → 0
[ + + ] eint
U(∞,t) = = C(∞,t) → 0 as ƞ → ∞ (16)
(27)
where Gr is the thermal Grashof number, Gc is the
mass Grashof number, Sc is the Schmidt number, Pr And, the temperature field is given by
is the Prandtl number, K is the viscoelastic
parameter, M is the Hartmann number and k is the (η,t)= + .eint (28)
permeability, Kr is the chemical reaction number
and N is the radiation parameter.
Similarly, the concentration distribution gives
3. METHOD OF SOLUTIONS
C(η,t)= + .eint (29)
In order to obtain the analytical solution of the
system of differential eq. (11), eq. (12) and eq. (15)
subject to boundary conditions eq. (16) we shall The Skin friction, Nusselt number and Sherwood
use the perturbation technique number is obtained by differentiating
3779
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org
of the heat transfer problems, the prandtl number increases, the velocity decreases. This is due to the
controls the relative thickness of the momentum buoyancy which is acting on the fluid particle.
and thermal boundary layers. Figure 2 and Figure 3 Figure 10 is noticed that in presence of mass
displays the velocity profiles for various values of Grashof number which increases the fluid velocity
Schmidt number and it observed that velocity as its value decreases.
profile decrease with increase in Sc and Sc1. This Figure 11 speaks to the dimensionless temperature
is physically true because, the Sc is a dimensionless profiles for different values of prandtl number with
number which is the ratio of momentum diffusivity constant chemical reaction and permeability
and mass diffusivity. Figure 4 portrays the parameter. It is clear that the temperature of the
estimation of n increases, the velocity decreases. fluid decreases as prandtl number increases. It is
Figure 5 signifies the radiation parameter effect on seen from Figure 12 that the temperature decreases
velocity, as radiation increases, velocity profile with increase in heat source/sink. From Figure 13
decreases. Figure 6 shows the different values of m the radiation parameter increasing with the
increases while decreasing the velocity profile. decrease of temperature. The impact of Schmidt
Figure 7 demonstrates the different values of M to number Sc and Sc1 on the concentration profiles is
be noted as Hartmann number, while velocity shown in Figure 14 and Figure 15. It is observed
decreases with increase of Hartmann number. that the species concentration decreases as the
Figure 8 presents the velocity profiles for different Schmidt number increases. Effect of chemical
values of viscoelastic parameter K, velocity is reaction on concentration are presented in Figure
found to be decreasing with the increase in 16. From this figure it is noticed that the
viscoelastic parameter. In Figure 9 effect of thermal concentration boundary layer shrink when the
Grashof number on velocity is presented. As Gr values of chemical reaction parameter increases.
0.6 0.8
Pr=1.7 Sc=0.3
Pr=2 Sc=0.6
0.7
0.5 Pr=3 Sc=0.8
Pr=5 Sc=1
0.6
Pr=7 Sc=1.3
0.4
0.5
velocity
velocity
0.3
0.4
0.2 0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y
y
Figure 1. Velocity profile for different values of Pr Figure 2. Velocity profile for different values of Sc
0.8 0.45
Sc1=0.6 n=0.1
0.7 Sc1=1.2 0.4 n=0.4
Sc1=1.8 n=0.7
Sc1=2.4 0.35 n=1
0.6
Sc1=3 n=1.5
0.3
0.5
0.25
velocity
velocity
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.15
0.2
0.1
0.1 0.05
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y
Figure 3. Velocity profile for different values of Sc1 Figure 4. Velocity profile for different values of n
3780
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org
0.6 0.7
N=1 m=1
N=1.5 m=1.5
0.6
0.5 N=2 m=2
N=2.5 m=2.5
N=3 0.5 m=3
0.4
0.4
velocity
velocity
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y
Figure 5. Velocity profile for different values of N Figure 6. Velocity profile for different values of m
0.6 3.5
M=1 K=1
M=1.5 K=1.5
3
0.5 M=2 K=2
M=2.5 K=2.9
M=3 2.5 K=3.2
0.4
2
velocity
velocity
0.3
1.5
0.2
1
0.1
0.5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y
Figure 7. Velocity profile for different values of M Figure 8. Velocity profile for different values of K
1.6 1.6
Gr=0.5
Gc=0.5
1.4 Gr=1
1.4 Gc=1
Gr=1.5
Gc=1.5
1.2 Gr=2
1.2 Gc=2
Gr=2.5
Gc=2.5
1
1
velocity
velocity
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y
Figure 9. Velocity profile for different values of Gr
Figure 10. Velocity profile for different values of Gc
3781
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org
2 2
Pr=1 F=1.3
1.8 Pr=1.5 1.8 F=1.5
Pr=2 F=2
1.6 1.6
Pr=2.5 F=2.5
Pr=3 F=3
1.4 1.4
1.2 1.2
temperature
temperature
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y
Figure 11. Temperature profile for different values of Pr Figure 12. Temperature profile for different values of F
2 1.4
N=1 Sc=0.50
1.8 N=1.5 Sc=0.71
1.2
N=2 Sc=1
1.6
N=2.5 Sc=2
N=3 1 Sc=5
1.4
1.2
concentration
temperature
0.8
1
0.6
0.8
0.6 0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y
Figure 13. Temperature profile for different values of N Figure 14. Concentration profile for different values of Sc
1.4 2
Sc1=0.50 Kc=1
Sc1=0.71 1.8 Kc=1.5
1.2
Sc1=1 Kc=2
1.6
Sc1=2 Kc=3
1 Sc1=5 Kc=5
1.4
concentration
concentration
1.2
0.8
1
0.6
0.8
0.4 0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y
Figure 15. Concentration profile for different values of Sc1 Figure 16. Concentration profile for different values of Kc
3782
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org
3783