Sunteți pe pagina 1din 7

International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.

12, December 2018


E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

Unsteady MHD flow of a viscoelastic fluid with


Oscillating temperature, Chemical reaction and
Radiation effect in a Porous Medium
R.Sakthikala1, S.Prahala2 , and S.Anuja3
Department of Mathematics1,2,3, PSGR Krishnammal College for women1,2,3, Coimbatore
Email 1, 2, 3: sakthikala09@gmail.com, prahalaselvam@gmail.com,anujasrinivasann@gmail.com

Abstract: The paper researches about the impact of radiation parameter and chemical reaction of unsteady
MHD flow of a viscoelastic fluid in a porous medium with oscillating temperature. The flow is assumed to be
incompressible electrically conducting and transmitting viscoelastic fluid in the presence of uniform magnetic
field. A uniform magnetic field is applied normal to the plate. The velocity, temperature and concentration
distributions are derived, solved analytically and their profiles for various physical parameters are appeared
through graphs. The coefficient of Skin friction, Nusselt number and Sherwood number are determined.

Keywords: Viscoelastic; porous medium; magnetohydrodynamics; chemical reaction.

1. INTRODUCTION variable temperature was studied by Jyotsna Rani


Pattnail et.al.,(2017). Omokhuale. E and
A magnetohydrodynamic generator is a device that Onwuka.G.S (2012) investigated about the effect of
changes thermal energy and kinetic energy into mass transfer and hall current on unsteady MHD
electricity. MHD fluid flow in different geometries flow of a viscoelastic fluid in a porous medium.
relevant to many interesting and important Effect of Hall current and chemical reaction and
scientific because of essential applications in Hydromagnetic flow of a stretching vertical surface
medical sciences and industrial technology. The with internal heat generation/ absorption was
MHD study has considerable interest in specialized examined by M.Salem and Mohamed Abd El-Aziz
field like MHD power generators, cooling of (2008). The effect of Hall current on MHD mixed
nuclear reactors, liquid metal flow control, micro convective flow of a viscous incompressible fluid
MHD pumps, high temperature plasmas, biological past a vertical porous plate immersed in a porous
transportation, drying processes and solidification medium with heat source/ sink studied by Sharma
of binary alloy etc. The interesting new problem et al (2007). Shateyi et al (2010) worked on the
generates from their importance in liquid metals, effect of thermal radiation, hall current, Soret and
electrolytes and ionized gases. On account of their Dufour on MHD flow by mixed convection over a
varied importance, these flows have been studied vertical surface in porous medium. . Singh et al
by several authors: Aboeldahab and Elbarby (2001) (2013) explained about the Hall current effect on
examined hall current effect on MHD free viscoelastic MHD oscillatory convective flow
convection flow past a semi -infinite vertical plate through a porous medium in a vertical channel with
with mass transfer. Chitra.M and suhasini.M (2018) heat radiation. Takhar (2006) studied about
examined the Effect of unsteady oscillatory MHD unsteady flow free convection flow over an infinite
flow through a porous medium in porous vertical vertical porous plate due to the combined effects of
channel with chemical reaction and concentration. thermal and mass diffusion, magnetic field and hall
Effect of Heat and Mass transfer on free convection current.
flow near a infinite vertical plate embedded in a
porous medium, which moves with time dependent 2. MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION
velocity in a viscous, electrically conducting
incompressible fluid under the influence of uniform We have considered an unsteady MHD two
magnetic field, applied normal to the plate was dimensional flow of a viscoelastic fluid which is
studied by K. Das and S. Jana (2010). Das (2010) incompressible and electrically conducting with
investigated the exact solution of MHD free oscillating temperature and mass transfer over a
convection flow and mass transfer near a moving infinite porous plate. Let x-axis is assumed to be
vertical porous plate in the presence of thermal vertically upward direction of flow along the plate
radiation. Radiation and mass transfer effects on and y-axis is taken normal to the plate. The induced
MHD flow through porous medium past an magnetic field is neglected as the magnetic Reynolds
exponentially accelerated inclined plate with number of the flow is very small, so that the

3777
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

produced magnetic field is insignificant. Likewise it By using the Rosseland approximation, the
is supposed that there is no applied voltage, so that radioactive flux vector qᵣ can be written as:
the electric field is vanished. The plate is assumed to =
be electrically non-conducting with uniform
magnetic field, B0 is applied normal to the plate and where and are respectively the Stefan-
the entire region of the fluid are at same temperature Boltzmann constant and the mean absorption
T∞ and concentration C∞. The governing equation coefficient. Assume that the temperature difference
for this investigation is based on the balance of within the flow is sufficiently small such that
linear momentum energy. All the fluid properties are may be expressed as linear function of the
considered to be constant except the influence of the temperature. This is accomplished by expanding in a
density variation caused by the temperature changes Taylor series about the free stream temperature
in the body force term. Taking into consideration and neglecting higher order terms, thus
the assumption made above the flow field is
governed by the following set of equations. (6)

The governing equations for the momentum, energy In view of eq. (5) and (6), eq. (3) reduces to:
and concentration are as follows:
+v = + (7)
+v =υ – k1 –σ + gβ ( –

∞) + gβ*( – ∞) – (1) Introducing the following non-dimensionless


parameters:

+v =υ – k1 –σ –
Ƞ= ,t= ,u= ,ω= , = ,C=
(2)
, Gr = , Gc = ,M=
+ v = ( – ∞) , Pr= , Sc= , Sc₁ =

, K = , k = ,

(3)
Kc = , F= , N= (8)

+ v = D + D1 K′c ( – ∞)
Substituting the dimensionless variables in eq.(10)
(4) into eq. (3), eq.(4), eq.(6) and eq. (9) and dropping
the bars
The boundary conditions for the problem are:

u = 0, ω = 0, T = T ∞ + (Tω – T∞ ) eint , C = C∞ + (Cω = – – – + Gr +


– C∞ ) eint at y → 0 GcC (9)
u → 0, ω → 0, T → 0, C → 0, as y → ∞ (5) –
= – – –
where u and v are the components of velocity in the (10)
x and y direction respectively, g is the acceleration
due to gravity, β and β* are the coefficient of
volume expansion, K is the kinematic ( ) (11)
viscoelasticity, ρ is the density, µ is the viscosity, υ
is the kinematic viscosity, KT is the thermal
conductivity, Cp is the specific heat in the fluid at
constant pressure, σ is the electrical conductivity of (12)

the fluid, µe is the magnetic permeability, D is the
molecular diffusivity, D₁ is the thermal diffusivity, The corresponding boundary conditions are
Tω is the temperature of the plane and T ∞ is the
temperature of the fluid far away from plane. Cω is u (0, t) = 0, ω(0,t) = 0, = eint , C(0,t) = eint at
the concentration of the plane and C∞ is the y→ 0
concentration of the fluid far away from plane, K′c is
the chemical reaction. And v = -v0, the negative sign u (∞, t) = ω(∞,t) = = C(∞,t) = 0 as
indicates that the suction is towards the plane. (13)

3778
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

Eq. (9) and eq. (10) can be obtained into a single U₁(0) =0, ₁ = C₁(0) = 1 at ƞ→0
equation by introducing the complex velocity.
U₁(∞) → 0, ₁ → 0, C₁(∞) → 0 as ƞ → ∞
U=u(ƞ,t)+iω(ƞ,t) (14)
(26)
where i = √
where the primes represents differentiation with
respect to η.
Thus,
Solving eq. (20) to eq. (25) subject to the boundary
+ = – – – + Gr + conditions eq. (26) substituting the obtained
GcC (15) solutions into eq. (17) to eq. (19) respectively.

with boundary conditions: Then the velocity field can be expressed as

U(η,t) = [ + + ]+
U(0,t) = 0, = eint , C(0,t) = eint at ƞ → 0
[ + + ] eint
U(∞,t) = = C(∞,t) → 0 as ƞ → ∞ (16)
(27)
where Gr is the thermal Grashof number, Gc is the
mass Grashof number, Sc is the Schmidt number, Pr And, the temperature field is given by
is the Prandtl number, K is the viscoelastic
parameter, M is the Hartmann number and k is the (η,t)= + .eint (28)
permeability, Kr is the chemical reaction number
and N is the radiation parameter.
Similarly, the concentration distribution gives
3. METHOD OF SOLUTIONS
C(η,t)= + .eint (29)
In order to obtain the analytical solution of the
system of differential eq. (11), eq. (12) and eq. (15)
subject to boundary conditions eq. (16) we shall The Skin friction, Nusselt number and Sherwood
use the perturbation technique number is obtained by differentiating

U(η,t)=U0+U1(η)eint (17) eq. (27) to eq. (29) and evaluated at η = 0


respectively.
(η,t)= + 1(η)eint (18)
| =[ + + ] + [
C(η,t)=C0+C1(η)eint (19)
] (30)
Substituting eq. (17) to eq. (19) into eq. (11), eq.
(12) and eq. (15) and comparing harmonic and non-
harmonic terms, we obtain | = (31)

P5U0″+U0′ - P6U0 = - r GcC (20) | = (32)



₁ ₁ (21)
4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

(22) The impact of Hall current, heat source and


chemical reaction on unsteady MHD flow of a
P4 1″+ 1′-( ) 0=0 (23) viscoelastic fluid through porous medium filled in a
vertical channel is analysed. Using various
P7C0″+C0′-KCC0=0 (24) parameter like Prandtl number, Grashoff number,
Schmidt number , radiation effect, heat flux etc the
flow of the fluid computations are performed on
P7C₁″+C₁′-P8C₁=0 (25) velocity, temperature and concentration profiles are
demonstrated graphically.
Figure 1 shows the velocity profile decrease with
and boundary conditions give increase in prandtl number. In a significant number

3779
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

of the heat transfer problems, the prandtl number increases, the velocity decreases. This is due to the
controls the relative thickness of the momentum buoyancy which is acting on the fluid particle.
and thermal boundary layers. Figure 2 and Figure 3 Figure 10 is noticed that in presence of mass
displays the velocity profiles for various values of Grashof number which increases the fluid velocity
Schmidt number and it observed that velocity as its value decreases.
profile decrease with increase in Sc and Sc1. This Figure 11 speaks to the dimensionless temperature
is physically true because, the Sc is a dimensionless profiles for different values of prandtl number with
number which is the ratio of momentum diffusivity constant chemical reaction and permeability
and mass diffusivity. Figure 4 portrays the parameter. It is clear that the temperature of the
estimation of n increases, the velocity decreases. fluid decreases as prandtl number increases. It is
Figure 5 signifies the radiation parameter effect on seen from Figure 12 that the temperature decreases
velocity, as radiation increases, velocity profile with increase in heat source/sink. From Figure 13
decreases. Figure 6 shows the different values of m the radiation parameter increasing with the
increases while decreasing the velocity profile. decrease of temperature. The impact of Schmidt
Figure 7 demonstrates the different values of M to number Sc and Sc1 on the concentration profiles is
be noted as Hartmann number, while velocity shown in Figure 14 and Figure 15. It is observed
decreases with increase of Hartmann number. that the species concentration decreases as the
Figure 8 presents the velocity profiles for different Schmidt number increases. Effect of chemical
values of viscoelastic parameter K, velocity is reaction on concentration are presented in Figure
found to be decreasing with the increase in 16. From this figure it is noticed that the
viscoelastic parameter. In Figure 9 effect of thermal concentration boundary layer shrink when the
Grashof number on velocity is presented. As Gr values of chemical reaction parameter increases.

0.6 0.8
Pr=1.7 Sc=0.3
Pr=2 Sc=0.6
0.7
0.5 Pr=3 Sc=0.8
Pr=5 Sc=1
0.6
Pr=7 Sc=1.3
0.4
0.5
velocity

velocity

0.3
0.4

0.2 0.3

0.2
0.1
0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y
y
Figure 1. Velocity profile for different values of Pr Figure 2. Velocity profile for different values of Sc

0.8 0.45
Sc1=0.6 n=0.1
0.7 Sc1=1.2 0.4 n=0.4
Sc1=1.8 n=0.7
Sc1=2.4 0.35 n=1
0.6
Sc1=3 n=1.5
0.3
0.5
0.25
velocity
velocity

0.4
0.2
0.3
0.15

0.2
0.1

0.1 0.05

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y

Figure 3. Velocity profile for different values of Sc1 Figure 4. Velocity profile for different values of n

3780
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

0.6 0.7
N=1 m=1
N=1.5 m=1.5
0.6
0.5 N=2 m=2
N=2.5 m=2.5
N=3 0.5 m=3
0.4

0.4
velocity

velocity
0.3
0.3

0.2
0.2

0.1
0.1

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y

Figure 5. Velocity profile for different values of N Figure 6. Velocity profile for different values of m

0.6 3.5
M=1 K=1
M=1.5 K=1.5
3
0.5 M=2 K=2
M=2.5 K=2.9
M=3 2.5 K=3.2
0.4

2
velocity
velocity

0.3
1.5

0.2
1

0.1
0.5

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y

Figure 7. Velocity profile for different values of M Figure 8. Velocity profile for different values of K

1.6 1.6
Gr=0.5
Gc=0.5
1.4 Gr=1
1.4 Gc=1
Gr=1.5
Gc=1.5
1.2 Gr=2
1.2 Gc=2
Gr=2.5
Gc=2.5
1
1
velocity

velocity

0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y
Figure 9. Velocity profile for different values of Gr
Figure 10. Velocity profile for different values of Gc

3781
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

2 2
Pr=1 F=1.3
1.8 Pr=1.5 1.8 F=1.5
Pr=2 F=2
1.6 1.6
Pr=2.5 F=2.5
Pr=3 F=3
1.4 1.4

1.2 1.2
temperature

temperature
1 1

0.8 0.8

0.6 0.6

0.4 0.4

0.2 0.2

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y

Figure 11. Temperature profile for different values of Pr Figure 12. Temperature profile for different values of F

2 1.4
N=1 Sc=0.50
1.8 N=1.5 Sc=0.71
1.2
N=2 Sc=1
1.6
N=2.5 Sc=2
N=3 1 Sc=5
1.4

1.2
concentration
temperature

0.8
1
0.6
0.8

0.6 0.4

0.4
0.2
0.2

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y

Figure 13. Temperature profile for different values of N Figure 14. Concentration profile for different values of Sc

1.4 2
Sc1=0.50 Kc=1
Sc1=0.71 1.8 Kc=1.5
1.2
Sc1=1 Kc=2
1.6
Sc1=2 Kc=3
1 Sc1=5 Kc=5
1.4
concentration
concentration

1.2
0.8
1
0.6
0.8

0.4 0.6

0.4
0.2
0.2

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
y y

Figure 15. Concentration profile for different values of Sc1 Figure 16. Concentration profile for different values of Kc

3782
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.6, No.12, December 2018
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

5. CONCLUSION [5] Jyotsna Rani Pattnaik, Gouranga Charan Dash


and Suprava Singh 2017, Radiation and mass
We have analysed and solved diagnostically transfer effects on MHD flow through porous
the effects of MHD flow of viscoelastic fluid medium past an exponentially accelerated
through porous medium in the presence of inclined plate with variable temperature. Ain
vertical channel with Chemical reaction and Shams Engineering Journal 8, 67-75.
[6] Omokhuale.E and Onwuka.G.I 2012 Effect of
Heat Source. The governing equations are
mass transfer and hall current of unsteady
approximated to a system of non-linear MHD flow of a viscoelastic fluid in a porous
ordinary differential equation with the similar medium. IOSR Journal of Engineering Volume
transformations. The result is presented 2 Issue 9 PP-50-59.
graphically and the flow field is concluded. It [7] Salem.A. M. and El-Aziz.M.Abd. 2008, Effect
is observed that the velocity increase with of Hall currents and Chemical reaction and
increase of Hartmann number, Radiative Heat Hydro magnetic flow of a stretching vertical
flux, Hall parameter, Chemical reaction and surface with internal heat generation /
permeability. The temperature profile absorption. Applied Mathematical Modelling,
decreases with decrease of Heat source and vol 32, 1236 –1254.
[8] Sharma.B. K., Jha, A.K. and Chaudary, R. C.
Radiative heat flux and the concentration
2007. Hall Effect on MHD mixed convective
profile decreases with decrease in Chemical flow of a viscous incompressible fluid past a
reaction and Schmidt number. vertical porous plate immersed in a porous
medium with Heat Source /Sink. Rom. Journ.
REFERENCE Phys. 52 (5-7), 487 – 503
[1] Aboeldahab.E.M. and Elbarby.E.M.E. 2001. [9] Shateyi.S, Motsa.S.S. and Sibanda.P. 2010, The
Hall current effect on Magneto hydrodynamics effects of thermal Radiation, Hall currents,
free convection flow past a semi-infinite Soret and Dufour on MHD flow by mixes
vertical plate with mass transfer. International convection over vertical surface in porous
journal of Engineering Sciences. 39, 1641- medium. Mathematical problem in
1652. Engineering, Article ID 627475
[2] Chitra.M and Suhasini.M 2018, Effect of [10] Singh.K.D, Garg.B.P and Bansal.A.K 2013,
unsteady oscillatory MHD flow through a Hall Current effect on viscoelastic MHD
porous medium in porous vertical channel with oscillatory convective flow through a porous
chemical reaction and concentration. IOP medium in a vertical channel with heat
Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series radiation. Pro Indian Natn Sci Acad 80 No.2
1000 -012039. PP 333-343.
[3] Das.K. and Jana.S. (2010). Heat and Mass [11] Takhar 2006. Unsteady flow free convective
transfer effects on unsteady MHD free flow over an infinite vertical porous plate due
convection flow near a moving vertical plate in to the combined effects of thermal and mass
a porous medium. Bull.Soc. Math. 17, 15 – 32. diffusion, magnetic field and Hall current.
[4] Das.K. 2010, Exact Solution of MHD free Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 39, 823-
convection flow and Mass Transfer near a 834.
moving vertical porous plate in the presence
of thermal radiation. AJMP. 8(1). 29 – 41.

3783

S-ar putea să vă placă și