Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
KEYWORDS: Binary Distillation, Mccabe-Thiele Method, Smoker’s Equation, CAD, Relative Volatility,
Lewis-Sorrel Method.
________________________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION number of plates for the rectifying and stripping
Distillation is agreeably the most widely applied sections.
method of separation because it has the advantage of
handling a wide range of throughput, feed Smoker (1938) presented an analytical equation that
composition and also the ability to achieve high can be used to determine the number of equilibrium
product purity. Binary distillation is a unit operation stages for a distillation column operating at a nearly
for separating two components in a mixture between constant relative volatility. Though this method is
a vapour and liquid phase based on the difference in suitable for any problem in which the relative
the volatilities of the components (Sinnot, 2005; volatility for the rectifying and stripping sections may
Richardson et. al., 2003). In calculating the design be taken as being relatively constant, it is particularly
parameters for binary distillation, two main methods useful when the relative volatility is low or
are applied. These are Lewis-Sorrel method and concentration of more volatile component in either
McCabe-Thiele method. The Lewis-Sorrel method product is very low, thus making it robust.
can also be applied to multi-component distillation to
determine the number of plates and is the basis of This study presents a technique that takes care of
modern computerized methods for design of situations when McCabe-Thiele diagram is
distillation columns (Treybal, 1982; Perry and Green, impracticable, like the case of separation of close
1997; Luyben, 2008). boiling isomers, where the relative volatility is close
to unity.
Techniques like McCabe-Thiele method become
impracticable when concentration of more volatile Modern engineering practice is becoming largely
component of either product is very low or the dependent on computer and information technology
volatility is low. due to the phenomenal growth in computer hardware.
Hence the design, maintenance and operation of
Alleva (1962) offered a solution to the first problem plants are performed using computer-aided design
by using a log-log plot, while Robinson and Gilliland (CAD) (Teicholz, 1985; Cogner, 1994; Chandrapatla
(1950) presented two equations for obtaining the and Berry, 1996).
338
Research Journal in Engineering and Applied Sciences (ISSN: 2276-8467) 1(5):338-341
A Smoker Equation Based Algorithm for Binary Distillation Design Calculations
There is therefore an ever-increasing need to modify If the feed stream is not at its boiling point, xf - for
CAD techniques using methods found to be the stripping section - is replaced by the value of x at
computationally efficient and robust the intersection of the operating lines;
* b ( x f /(q 1))
Derivation of Equations xf (16)
A straight operating line can be represented by the (q /(q 1)) S
equation;
y Sx b (1) Algorithm for Binary Distillation Design
In terms of relative volatility, the equilibrium values Calculations
of y are given by; Input: α, R, xd, xf, xb, q
Rectifying Section Calculations
x
y (2) E10 S
1 ( 1) x
Eliminating y from equations (1) and (2) gives a E11 b
quadratic equation in x of the form; E4 k , subject to 0 < k < 1
S ( 1) x 2 ( S ( 1) ) x b 0 (3) E8 x0
*
R x f xd ( R 1)k xb Solution
S (14) We modify the problem by using a relative volatility
( R 1)( x f xb ) of 2.46 instead of the equilibrium data (Richardson
( x f xb ) xb et. al., 2003). This value of relative volatility closely
b (15) matches with the equilibrium data.
( R 1)( x f xb )
339
Research Journal in Engineering and Applied Sciences (ISSN: 2276-8467) 1(5):338-341
A Smoker Equation Based Algorithm for Binary Distillation Design Calculations
Input: α = 2.4600, R = 3.5000, xd = 0.9740, xf = The Fenske’s equation is another relation that
0.4400, xb = 0.0240. assumes a constant relative volatility. Backhurst and
Harker (1999) compared calculation of number of
The input data were obtained by converting the plates at total reflux, using both McCabe-Thiele and
values given as percentage by weight to their molar Fenske’s equation, and concluded that a deviation
equivalents (Backhurst and Harker, 1999). (reduction in actual number of plates required) of
about 23.25% was justifiable based on the
Output 1: S = 0.7778 assumption of constant relative volatility.
b = 0.2164
k = 0.1877 CONCLUSION
x0* = 0.7863 In comparison to the deviation between Fenske’s
xn* = 0.2523 equation and McCabe-Thiele method, the solution
c = 1.2740 obtained using the algorithm based on Smoker’s
β = 1.2081 analytical equation is acceptable. It can also be
NR = 5.6512 observed that the deviation adds to the number of
Output 2: S = 1.2853 theoretical plates obtained using McCabe-Thiele
b = -6.8462 x 10-3 method, thus ensuring the achievement of the
k = 0.6370 required product purity, unlike a deviation that
x0* = -0.1970 reduces the actual number of theoretical plates, as
xn* = -0.6130 was the case of Fenske’s equation. Since the
c = 1.9300 algorithm computes the number of plates in the
β = -1.5560 rectifying and stripping sections of the column
NR = 5.7736 separately, it also gives an indication of the position
N = 11.4248 of the feed plate.
NOMENCLATURE
Symbol Definition Units
Ei Equation (i) Nil
x Molar fraction of more volatile component Dimensionless
xf Molar fraction of more volatile component in feed Dimensionless
xd Molar fraction of more volatile component in distillate Dimensionless
xb Molar fraction of more volatile component in bottoms Dimensionless
α Relative volatility Dimensionless
R Reflux ratio Dimensionless
NR Number of plates in the rectifying section Dimensionless
NS Number of plates in the rectifying section Dimensionless
N Number of plates in the rectifying section Dimensionless
q Heat required to vapourize one mole of a component J/mol
Backhurst, J. R., and J. R. Harker (1999) “Coulson Cogners, S. A. (1994) “The New Software
and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering”, Vol. 5, 2nd Engineering”, Wadsworth publishing company,
ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, London, pp. Belmont, California, pp. 501-539
109-110,137.
340
Research Journal in Engineering and Applied Sciences (ISSN: 2276-8467) 1(5):338-341
A Smoker Equation Based Algorithm for Binary Distillation Design Calculations
341