Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.

com™  

Like 0 Tweet
Search

 
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1904 > April 1904 Decisions > G.R. No. 1614 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v.
  ANACLETO EMBATE
 
003 Phil 640:

Search

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 1614. April 9, 1904. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. ANACLETO EMBATE, Defendant-Appellant.

Eleuterio Rodriguez, for Appellant.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS

1. CRIMINAL LAW; HOMICIDE; CAUSE OF DEATH. — In order to justify a conviction for


homicide it must appear that the acts committed by the accused were the cause of death.

DECISION

ARELLANO, C.J. :
DebtKollect Company, Inc.
The defendant was charged with homicide, convicted, and sentenced to sic years and six
months’ imprisonment, with the accessories, to the payment of 500 pesos as damages, and
the costs. The dead child had been seriously ill with fever for three weeks. One day the child
had lain down on a damp floor and the defendant told him not to lie there but upon the mat.
As the child did not obey, the accused struck him upon the thighs with a slipper and pulled, or
as the complaint says, pushed and dragged him toward it, throwing him heavily upon the
floor. One or two days after the child died.

All the witnesses attribute the death of the child to the illness it was suffering; but the doctor,
who did nothing more than to examine the body and give his certificate as to certain bruises
on the thighs, in his testimony states that the body showed unequivocal signs of serious
disease of the heart, and that the bruises could not have caused the death of the child, but
might have contributed to accelerate the fatal result of that illness, which was a serious
affection of the heart. Being asked by the judge whether the gravity of the child’s illness,
owing to the affection of the heart, was such that it might have died without the blows which
were inflicted upon him, the witness replied that "if in the first place the age of the child is
ChanRobles Intellectual Property Division
taken into consideration, and in the second its surrounding circumstances, its conditions was
 
such as to lead one to expect a fatal result, no physician being in attendance." c ra la w virtu a 1 a w lib ra ry

Upon being further questioned as to whether he believed that the blows inflicted upon the
child and which produced the bruises were the caused of its death, he replied that "as no
other approximate cause is known that the great excitement produced by those blows, it may
be inferred that they were the sole cause which precipitated the fatal result of the illness of
the child."
   
c ra la w virtu a 1 a w lib ra ry

We do not find in this testimony, given solely upon th e result of the examination of the body,
sufficient evidence as to the true cause of the death of the child. But it is true that the
accused did strike him for the purpose of inflicting punishment, and as by this he committed
a misdemeanor which should not go unpunished, and which can be punished in this same
cause under the provisions of section 29 of General Orders, No. 58, we therefore acquit
Anacleto Embate of the charge of homicide and condemn him to fifteen days of arresto, with
such costs as would be chargeable in a prosecution before a justice of the peace. So
ordered.

Torres, Cooper, Mapa, McDonough and Johnson, JJ., concur.

Ads by Google   ► Legal Forms   ► Legal Law   ► Case Law   ► Law Firm
Ads by Google   ► Law Firm   ► Law School   ► Law

Back to Home | Back to Main


 
QUICK SEARCH

1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908


1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916
1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924
1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932
1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956
1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
  2013 2014 2015 2016        

 
Main Indices of the Library ---> Go!
 

 
April-1904 Jurisprudence                 
G.R. No. 1656 April 2, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MARIANO DE LA
CRUZ

003 Phil 573

G.R. No. 1627 April 2, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. GEORGE


WASHINGTON

003 Phil 575

G.R. No. 1107 April 2, 1904 - IN RE: AUGUSTUS A. MONTAGNE &


FRANK E. DOMINGUEZ

003 Phil 577

G.R. No. 1490 April 2, 1904 - O. F. CAMPBELL AND GO-TAUCO v.


BEHN, MEYER & CO.

003 Phil 590

G.R. No. 1132 April 2, 1904 - MARTINIANO M. VELOSO v. PETRONA


NAGUIT, ET AL.

003 Phil 604

G.R. No. 1645 April 4, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. HOGU REYES, ET


AL.

003 Phil 611

G.R. No. 1564 April 5, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO DE LA


PATA, ET AL.

003 Phil 612

G.R. No. 1625 April 7, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. EULALIO BUNDOC,


ET AL.

003 Phil 614

G.R. No. 1462 April 8, 1904 - LA RAZON SOCIAL DE HIJOS DE I. DE


LA RAMA v. ROSENDO LACSON

003 Phil 618

G.R. No. 1587 April 8, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MAXIMO


DALAWAN

003 Phil 620

G.R. No. 1673 April 8, 1904 - PETRONILA ENCARNACION v. B. S.


AMBLER

003 Phil 623

G.R. No. 1542 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CORNELIO


DEVELA, ET AL.

003 Phil 625

G.R. No. 1559 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. LORENZO ALBANO

003 Phil 630


G.R. No. 1585 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. ESTEBAN VIRAY

003 Phil 631

G.R. No. 1586 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FELIPE NAVARRO

003 Phil 633

G.R. No. 1905 April 9, 1904 - FLAVIANO FELIZARDO, ET AL. v.


JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OF IMUS

003 Phil 635

G.R. No. 1326 April 9, 1904 - FELIX FANLO AZNAR v. W. F. NORRIS

003 Phil 636

G.R. No. 1614 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. ANACLETO


EMBATE

003 Phil 640

G.R. No. 1535 April 11, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN GINETE

003 Phil 641

G.R. No. 1447 April 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. PERFECTO DE


LEON, ET AL.

003 Phil 645

G.R. No. 1573 April 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS DE


GUZMAN

003 Phil 654

G.R. No. 1620 April 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FAUSTINO


GUILLERMO

003 Phil 657

G.R. No. 1318 April 12, 1904 - PRISCA NAVAL, ET AL. v.


FRANCISCO ENRIQUEZ, ET AL.

003 Phil 669

G.R. No. 1547 April 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. SANTIAGO


MANIQUE, ET AL.

003 Phil 675

G.R. No. 1574 April 13, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CHOA CHI CO

003 Phil 678

G.R. No. 1529 April 13, 1904 - ESTEFANIA VILLAR v. MUNICIPAL


BOARD OF MANILA

003 Phil 681

G.R. No. 1492 April 15, 1904 - TAN MACHAN v. MARIA GAN AYA DE
LA TRINIDAD, ET AL.

   003 Phil 684

G.R. No. 1603 April 15, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FLAVIANO


SIMEON

003 Phil 688

G.R. No. 1688 April 15, 1904 - FINDLAY & CO. v. BYRON S. AMBLER

003 Phil 690

G.R. No. 1329 April 15, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. RAFAEL SAMIO

003 Phil 691

G.R. No. 1362 April 15, 1904 - ROSA LLORENTE v. CEFERINO


RODRIGUEZ

003 Phil 697

G.R. No. 1356 April 15, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CHARLES


BARNES

003 Phil 704

G.R. No. 1412 April 15, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. J. C.


WINEBRENNER

003 Phil 705

G.R. No. 1853 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. JOHN P. MILLER

003 Phil 708

G.R. No. 1479 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. VICTORINA DE


LOS SANTOS

003 Phil 710

G.R. No. 1501 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CANUTO


BUTARDO

003 Phil 712

G.R. No. 1546 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FELIPE RAMA

003 Phil 716

G.R. No. 1590 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. TELESFORO


RORALDO, ET AL.

003 Phil 719

G.R. No. 1646 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. VENTURA


MARIANO

003 Phil 723

G.R. No. 1552 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. DAVID TOMULAC

003 Phil 728

G.R. No. 1592 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. APOLONIO


NATIVIDAD

003 Phil 732

G.R. No. 1705 April 22, 1904 - TOMAS BLANCO v. BYRON S.


AMBLER
003 Phil 735

G.R. No. 1779 April 22, 1904 - FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ REPIDE v.


JOHN C. SWEENEY

003 Phil 738

G.R. No. 1385 April 22, 1904 - RAFAEL ENRIQUEZ ET AL. v.


FRANCISCO ENRIQUEZ ET AL.

003 Phil 746

G.R. No. 1477 April 22, 1904 - MARIA GONZALEZ v. SIMEON BLAS

003 Phil 749

G.R. No. 1505 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. VALENTIN


BUTARDO, ET AL.

003 Phil 751

G.R. No. 1110 April 22, 1904 - ROMAN SARMIENTO v. MORTGAGE


& DOMINGUEZ

004 Phil 1

G.R. No. 1184 April 22, 1904 - COMPAÑIA AGRICOLA DE


ULTRAMAR v. ANACLETO REYES ET AL.

004 Phil 2

G.R. No. 1244 April 22, 1904 - COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS


DE FILIPINAS v. MIGUEL TOPINO ET AL.

004 Phil 33

G.R. No. 1596 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. HILARIO ZAFRA
ET. AL.

004 Phil 71

G.R. No. 1616 April 22, 1904 - JUAN CAÑIZARES HIVA v. THE
PHILIPPINE TRADING COMPANY

004 Phil 74

G.R. No. 1626 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. HERMOGENES


ONTI

004 Phil 78

G.R. No. 1806 April 22, 1904 - SERVILIANO LANZUELA SANTOS v.


JOHN C. SWEENEY

004 Phil 79

G.R. No. 1810 April 22, 1904 - EULOGIO GARCIA v. B. S. AMBLER

004 Phil 81

 
 
  Copyright © 1998 - 2016 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™  RED

S-ar putea să vă placă și