Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
RESEARCH PLAN
The theory of stress and coping stressors was initially identified in the
earlier work of Lazarus and Cohen (1977). They identified three types of
stressors:
1. Mass casualty stressors such as man-made and natural
disasters, major catastrophes and uncontrollable phenomena that
affect a large number of people.
2. Major changes which affect a single person or a small group of
people.
3. Daily hassles are the small, day-to-day situations or events that
irritate or distress people.
The types of stressors discussed above had always been part of the
firefighting career. As firefighters whose job is to deal man-made and
natural disasters (environmental stressors and ecological factors), they
tend to be more prone to stress.
There are various ways for people to cope with stressors and feelings of
stress in their lives. Firefighting personnel use diverse methods to combat
stressors. Lazarus and Folkman (1984) defined coping as “constantly
changing cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage specific external
and/or internal demands that are appraised as taxing or exceeding the
resources of the person” (p. 141). Their theory conceptualizes that coping
is a process that a person employs to handle stressors (Milen, 2009).
Hanson (2019) refers to the ideas of Arya, & Pandey (2016) and Mandal et
al. (2016): Maslach and Jackson (1981) developed a comprehensive
model to measure burnout includes examining six identifying factors in the
workplace that signal burnout: workload, control, reward, community,
fairness, and 34 values (Mandal, Arya, & Pandey, 2016). Burnout emerges
when one or more of these six areas is chronically incongruent between an
individual and his/her job. Over time, passion eventually diminishes when
these six factors become disconnected (Mandal et al., 2016).
Resilience Theory
Stress
Coping Strategies
The study will begin with a quantitative approach by assessing whether the
variables (stress, burnout, resilience and coping strategies) are correlated
with each other or not. After collecting and analyzing the quantitative data,
the researchers will conduct use a qualitative approach through an
interview to support the quantitative results. When the qualitative data was
collected and analyzed, the researchers will analyze the overall data
collected (qualitative and quantitative). With this, the researchers will
develop the ALAB Program.
METHODOLOGY
Research The study will utilize a Mixed Methods Research which involves the use of
Design both the Qualitative and Quantitative method. Specifically, the researchers
used the Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Design.
For the quantitative part of the study, the study utilized the Correlational
Research Design. It is a non-experimental research method in which two
or more variable are measured to understand and evaluate the statistical
relationship between the variables without any influence from any
extraneous variable. This method will be used to evaluate the relationship
between stress, burnout, resilience and coping strategies of the firefighters
in BFP Imus.
Respondents The respondents of this study will be the firefighters of Bureau Of Fire
Protection in the City of Imus Cavite. The whole population of the
firefighters in the BFP Imus will be taken for the quantitative part of the
study while only the selected participants will be taken for the qualitative
part of the study.
For the quantitative part of the study, the Total Population Sampling will be
used. The Total Population Sampling Approach is a type of Purposive
Sampling Technique that involves taking in the entire population that has
the particular set of characteristics needed for the study as participants.
For this study, all the firefighters of the Bureau Of Fire Protection in the
City of Imus, Cavite will be the participants.
For the qualitative part of the study, the researchers will used the Follow-
up Explanation Model in which we will randomly select participants for the
interview or follow-up.
Instrumentation Coping Strategy
Filipino Coping Strategies Scale
The Reliability analysis revealed items that are internally consistent with
each other. Furthermore, construct validity was established via a) factor
analysis through principal components analysis extraction method and
varimax rotation method and b) test for convergent validity by correlating
each domain of the Filipino Coping Strategies scale with the corresponding
domains of Ways of Coping by Folkman and Lazarus and the COPE
Inventory by Carver, Scheier, and Weintraub. Independent samples t-test
revealed significant differences among males and females in each coping
strategy which served as the basis for norm groups (Rilveria, 2018).
The coefficient alpha for each coping strategy ranges from .60 to .95. The
overall coefficient alpha for the Filipino Coping Strategies Scale is .716.
Domains:
a) Cognitive Appraisal: 1, 8, 17, 23 and 30
b) Social Support: 9, 24 and 31
c) Problem Solving: 2, 10, 18 and 32
d) Religiosity: 3, 11, 19 and 33
e) Tolerance: 12 and 25
f) Emotional Release: 4, 13, 26 and 34
g) Overactivity: 5, 14, 20, 27, 35
h) Relaxation/Recreation: 6, 15, 21, 28 and 36
i) Substance Abuse: 7, 16, 22, 37 and 39
Scoring:
The score is computed by dividing the total raw score by the number of
items per domain.
BURNOUT
The Maslach Burnout Inventory for Health and Human Services Scale is a
subset of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. It was specifically developed to
measure burnout indicators for helping professions like the firefighters. The
scale is a 22-item survey which utilizes a 7-point Likert type scale (0-6
rating). The MBI-HSS is subdivided into three categories of burnout: (9)
emotional exhaustion which assesses the feelings of being emotionally
overextended and exhausted by one’s work, (5) depersonalization which
evaluates an unfeeling and impersonal response toward recipients of one’s
service, care treatment, or instruction, and (8) personal accomplishment
which measures one’s feelings of competence and successful
achievement in one’s work.
Interpretation
Emotional Exhaustion
≥27: High
17-26: Moderate
0-16: Low
Depersonalization
≥14: High
9-13: Moderate
0-8: Low
Personal Achievement
0-30: High
31-36: Moderate
≥37: Low
RESILIENCE
Scoring
Scoring
Interpretation
Scores can range from 0 to 40. The higher the score is, the higher the
perceived stress of an individual.
jjj
After
Qualitative Data Collection
The purpose of the study is to explore the stress level, resiliency, burnout level and coping
strategies of the firefighters and to develop a program that would aid the needs of the
firefighters.
REFERENCE:
http://www.imus.gov.ph/departments-and-units/bureau-of-fire-protection/
Hanson, A. (2019). The relationship between stress, burnout, and mindfulness among
firefighters (Order No. 13902152). Available from ProQuest Central; ProQuest
Dissertations & Theses Global. (2282579383). Retrieved from
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2282579383?accountid=173015
When burnout is left untreated, firefighters are at a greater risk for more severe
stress conditions due to prolonged unaddressed stress exposure (Carter, Kofler,
Forster, & McCullough, 2015). Maslach and Jackson (1981) created the Maslach
Burnout Inventory to evaluate burnout based on measures of exhaustion, cynicism,
and sense of inefficacy (Hanson, 2019).
Recent burnout research in firefighters demonstrates consistent findings. Burnout
continues to plague firefighters nationally and internationally, as recent studies
demonstrate (Hagan, Lien, Hauff, & Heir, 2016; Heitman, 2016; Krok, 2016). Most of
the research on firefighter burnout includes studies involving international populations
(Bai & Li, 2015; Lee et al., 2018; Sommerfeld, Wagner, Harder, & Schmidt, 2017).
Sommerfeld et al. (2017) through a qualitative approach, studied Canadian
firefighters regarding behavioral health interventions and its relationship on burnout.
Burnout is influenced by environment, with significant differences between national
and international ecologies. Yet, commonalities in national and international burnout
experience suggest certain constants in its appearance and effect of firefighters.
Resiliency Quiz
The Resiliency Quiz was developed by Al Sievert, PhD., over years ofgathering
observations, interviews and anecdotes to help people assess their own progress
towards resiliency. Siebert stated that healthy resilient people have stress-resistant
personalities and learn valuable lessons from rough experiences. Resilience is the
process of successfully adapting to difficult or challenging life experiences. Resilient
people overcome adversity, bounce back from setbacks, and can thrive under
extreme, on-going pressure from traumatic experiences stronger, better, and wiser.
When hurt or distressed, resilient people expect to find a way to have things turn out
well. They feel self-reliant and have learning and coping reaction rather than the
victim or blaming reaction that is so common these days.
The test was proven to be reliable and valud due to some studies that were
conducted by several psychologists and professionals who used this as their
instrument. Some psychologist like Sabine, PhD, Fredrickson, PhD, the author of
Positivity (Crown Archetype, 2009) Darcy
The participants will answer 20 items quiz by rating their selves according to their
own perspective. The following is the given rating scale:
1= very little
2= little
3: Moderate
4: Strong
5: Very Strong
Milen, D. (2009). The ability of firefighting personnel to cope with stress. Journal of
Social Change, 3(1), 38-56. Retrieved from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bbc8/163425043ede34872e9d3025837942191629.p
df
Firefighting personnel experience stress each day in their work settings. Their ability to cope
with stress affects their capacity to function effectively in emergency situations. Society has
a stake in the ability of firefighting personnel to carry out their responsibilities effectively.
Given the threat of natural disasters, the threats from terrorist attacks, mass casualties, and
major environmental incidents, society depends on the services of firefighting personnel who
work long hours with little relief in these situations (Milen, 2009).
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/resilience