Final Geotech Report (Gomoh)

Neel Construction Links Pvt. Ltd.
total support for your project

A-402, Rail Vihar, Sector - 15 Part - II
Gurgoan – 122001 (Tel: - 0124-4034561/225564)
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED
ROR Line in DN GC Railway Line
At GOMOH
Report No. : 18-111

Issued Date: 29.12.2018
CLIENT:
Dy CE Construction / GOMOH E.C. Railway
CONTRACTOR :
Voyants Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
403, 4th Floor, Park Centra, NH-8,
Sector-30, Gurugram-122001,Haryana
Geotechnical Consultant
M/s. Ultra Geo Civil Projects Private Limited

G-1, Plot No. 968, Shalimar Garden Extn.-1,
Sahibabad, Ghaziabad-201005
Ph-0120-2649001, E-mail: ultradelhi@gmail.com
INDEX
Sl. No. Content Page
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. SCOPE OF WORK 1
3. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 2-3
4. LABORATORY WORK 4-5
5. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS 6-9
6. COMPUTATIONS OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY 10-12
7. RESULTS, CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS 13-14
8. LIMITATIONS 15
9. CLOSURE 16
10 APPENDIX
APPENDIX-I: LOCATION PLAN 17-18
APPENDIX-II: BORELOGS 19-42
APPENDIX-III: LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 43-66
APPENDIX-IV: SAFE BEARING CAPACITY 67-125
APPENDIX-V: ABBREVIATIONS 126-127
APPENDIX-VI: REFERENCES 128-130
APPENDIX-VII: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 42
Page 1
1. INTRODUCTION
This report describes the various activities executed at site, in laboratory and depicts the nature
of sub-soil strata. This report also evaluates the various soil properties required for computation
of Safe Bearing Capacity required for “Proposed ROR Line in DN GC Railway Line at GOMOH.
This job of subsurface exploration was assigned to M/s. Ultra Geo Civil Projects Private Limited,
Ghaziabad (UP) by M/s Neel Construction Links Pvt. Ltd. A-402, Rail Vihar, Sector-15 /II,
Gurgaon-122011.
2. SCOPE OF WORK
In order to collect data and achieve the project objectives, studies and site investigations were
conducted. Main purpose of these studies was to obtain the relevant geotechnical data
including sub-surface profile, classification, behavior and engineering properties of soil / rock.
Analysis of field and laboratory test results and to provide the precise and feasible
recommendations of foundations for “for “Proposed ROR Line in DN GC Railway Line at
GOMOH. The Bore Holes depth is taken as suggested by the Client for boring at different
locations.
Page 01
3.0 Field Investigation
3.1 Mobilization on Site
The required equipment and team was mobilized to the site for carrying out the
required field work and demobilized on satisfactory completion of the entire field work.
3.2 Setting Out Locations

The site/Bore hole was located as per the instructions given by the Client. Upon
identification of location further boring activity was commenced from dated 27.09.2018
to 30.10 2018.
3.3 Standard Penetration Test

Standard penetration test is the most commonly used in-situ test, especially for
cohesionless soils which cannot be easily sampled. Test was carried out as per IS
2131 at every change in stratum or at alternate intervals of not more than 1.5 m. SPT
Test is performed as per IS 2131. Drilling mud is used to support the sides of the hole.
A thick wall split-tube sampler is driven into the undisturbed soil at the bottom of the
hole under the blows of a 63.5Kg drive weight with 75cm free fall. The number of
blows required to drive the sampler 30cm beyond the seating drive is termed the
penetration resistance N. The standard penetration number is corrected for dilatancy
correction and overburden correction as per IS 2131.
3.4 Undisturbed Soil Sample

Undisturbed sample were obtained during the course of boring. These samples have
the natural structure of soil and the water content. Undisturbed samples are obtained
by forcing a thin wall sampler into the soil at the bottom of the bore hole. The
penetration of the sampler into the soil should be continuous. The sampler should
never be over driven so as to compress the sample. A suitable sample tube (A
seamless tube, also known as Shelby tube), dia. of 75 to 100 mm was used
depending upon the nature of soil strata, the variability in diameter of Shelby tubes is
required so as to recover undisturbed samples as per suitability for the underlining soil
strata.
Each Sample extracted was labeled properly and kept separately in poly bags to
maintain the natural moisture content.
Page 02
3.5 Disturbed Soil Sample
During the course of boring, disturbed samples were obtained by drill bit. Collected
disturbed samples were used for verification of layer stratification. Immediately after
taken from borehole, the samples will be placed in polybags and labeled.
3.6 Ground Water Table

For most types of construction, water-logged ground is undesirable because of its low
bearing capacity.
3.7 Protection, Handling and Labeling of Sample

All necessary care as per IS 1892 was taken in protection and handling of samples
and in their full labeling, so that samples were received in a fit state for examination
and testing and could correctly recognized as coming from a specified borehole.
a) Undisturbed Sample: As per IS 1892:1979-Annexure-E, samples which are

retained in a liner or which are retained in a seamless tube sampler received the
following treatment, immediately after being taken from the boring or trial pit, the
ends of the sample were cut and removed to a depth of about 2.5 cm (or more in
the top to cover any obviously disturbed soil). Several layers of molten wax were
then being applied to each end to give a plug about 2.5 cm thick. Porous sample
were applied a layer of waxed paper will first be placed over the ends of the
sample. A label bearing the number of the sample was placed inside the sampling
tube just under the lid. It was placed at the top of the sample.
b) Disturbed sample: As per IS 1892:1979-Annexure-E, immediately after being

taken from the bore hole or trial pit, the sample were placed in a poly bag to
prevent any appreciable change of natural water content of the sample till the time
it is tested. The bags were identified with a label.
Page 03
4.0 Laboratory Work
The Undisturbed and disturbed soil sample collected during the sub surface investigation was
transferred to the laboratory. The laboratory testing of samples have been carried out to
access physical as well as strength deformation characteristics of the soil.
The broad objectives of laboratory testing of soil are given below:
1. Measurement of Physical Properties of Soil for Soil Classification. Based on Soil
Classification, general guide lines for hydraulic properties (permeability etc.), Strength
properties (shear strength parameters, compressibility etc.), suitability of soil for
different purpose (e.g. foundations, etc.) can be obtained. The tests required are
Sieve Analysis, Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit Tests.
2. Determination of Strength Properties of soil for determination of bearing capacity of

foundations etc. Direct Shear/ Tri-axial Compression Test can be used for this
purpose.
All the tests are carried out in accordance with relevant Indian Standards Codes on Soil
Engineering. The soil based on physical properties is classified as per IS 1498 – 1970. The
detailed procedure and guide lines for the Laboratory Tests are given in relevant Indian
Standards on Soil Engineering. A brief description of different tests is given below:
The Sieve Analysis Test is performed for particle size distribution analysis of coarse fraction.
The sieves are from 75 microns to 4.75mm for sand with / without fine fraction. For soils
containing Gravels, the set of sieves up to 80mm size are to be used.
Consistency Limits Are Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Shrinkage Limit. These tests are
performed on fine grained soil with cohesion (clay and plastic Silt). The cohesive soil exhibits
plasticity in presence of water. The in-situ strength of such soil depends very much on its water
content. Liquid Limit Test and Plastic Limit Test are used for classification of fine grained soil
as per IS Classification. Higher Liquid Limit Coupled with lower Plasticity Index (Liquid Limit –
Plastic Limit) indicates Swelling Soil. The Plastic Limit is the water content at which the soil
when rolled into threads of 3mm diameter on a glass plate just crumbles.
The shear strength of soil is measured mainly using Direct Shear Test and/or Tri-axial
Compression Test. Direct shear test is mainly used for Cohesionless soils. The sample of size
60 x 60 x 25mm ht. is sheared by applying shear force on predefined horizontal plane. The plot
of normal stress v/s shear stress gives shear parameters: Cohesion and Angle of Internal
Friction. Tri-axial Compression Test is best suited for Clayey soil. The sample of size 38mm
dia. x 76mm height. After applying confining pressure, deviator stress is applied till failure. %
Free Swell Test is measure of increase in volume of a soil sample in water compared with a
similar weight poured in identical volume of Kerosene.
Page 04
CORE LOGGING, CORE RECOVERY, RQD
Core logging is done to describe type & characteristics rock stratum occurring in the field, geological
structures including detailing for preservation & identification of the Cores obtained during drilling. In
core logging, the cores are to be indexed and stored as per I.S.: 4078 The observations are made for %
Core Recovery, length and number of pieces of cores, Fractured Surfaces, Rock Quality Designation,
nature and type of rock, geological structures, etc. The information obtained by core logging is
represented in the Lithologs.
On removing the core from the barrel, all pieces of core are put in a partitioned wooden box
specially built for the purpose. The ratio of total length of rock pieces collected to length drilled,
expressed as percentage, is known as Core Recovery (CR). To obtain Rock Quality Designation (RQD),
only those pieces of rock which are 100mm and longer are measured for their total length. The above
length divided by length drilled, expressed as percentage, is known as RQD. RQD value is always equal
to or less than the value of core recovery.
CR (%) = (Length of Core/Length of Run) *100
RQD (%) = (Length of core pieces,100mm and above/ Length of run) *100
If the core is broken by handling or during drilling (i.e. the fracture surfaces are fresh, irregular
breaks rather than natural joint surfaces), the fresh broken pieces are fitted together and counted as one
piece. Some judgment is necessary in case of thinly bedded sedimentary rocks and foliated
metamorphic rocks and the method is not so exact in these cases as in igneous rocks, thick bedded
limestone, sand stones etc. However, the system has been applied successfully even for shale,
although it is necessary to log the cores immediately upon removing them from the core barrel before air
slacking and cracking can begin.
LABORATORY TESTING: (ROCK SAMPLES)

The selected Rock Core samples are used for testing Specific Gravity, Unconfined Compressive
Strength, Water Absorption etc. The samples are prepared in accordance with IS 9179-1979. The rock
samples collected from various depths from the boreholes drilled were tested in the laboratory to
determine the Unconfined Compressive strength (I.S. 9143-1979) of the rock. The rock cores of the size
in the ratio 2:1 of length and diameter are selected for the determination of Unconfined Compressive
strength of the rock, applying uniform pressure. The samples are polished on either side and analyzed
for crushing strength. The maximum pressure at which the sample shows the breaking tendency is said
to be the Crushing strength of the rock at that depth. Pycnometer method is used for determination of
Specific Gravity.
All the test results are given in the Appendix-III of this report.
Page 05
5.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
5.1 Geology
The proposed area falls GOMOH. Geologically the area is covered by weathered rocks.
5.2 Site Stratigraphy

The Sub Soil Strata at proposed location is observed as follows: -
BH-01:
From ground surface to 0.5 meter : Light Redish gray Silty Sand
From 1.5 to 3.0 meter : Silty Sand & highly weathered rock
From 3.0 to 6.5 meter : Silty Sand & highly weathered rock
From 6.5 to 9.5 meter : Light Redish brown quartzite fractured disintegrated
From 9.5 to 10.5 meter : Grey medium hard fractured highly weathered rock
BH-02:
From ground surface to 1.0 meter : Yellowish brown Silty Sand
From 1.5 to 3.0 meter : Yellowish brown Silty Sand with gravels
From 3.0 to 4.0 meter : Light Grey to brown Weathered rock
From 4.0 to 5.0 meter : Yellowish sand Stone
From 5.0 to 9.0 meter : Fractured disintegrated rocks
BH-03:
From ground surface to 1.0 meter : Light Redish brown Silty Sand with coarse grains
From 1.5 to 3.0 meter : Light Redish brown Silty Sand with coarse grains
From 3.0 to 6.0 meter : Light grey brown silty sand
From 6.0 to 11.0 meter : Weathered rock with sand stone
BH-04:
From ground surface to 0.5 meter : Light Redish brown Silty Sand
From 1.5 to 4.5 meter : Light Redish brown Silty Sand with coarse grains
From 4.5 to 9.0 meter : Light Redish brown Silty Sand
From 9.0 to 10.0 meter : Weathered rock with silty sand
BH-05:
From ground surface to 0.5 meter : Light Redish gray Silty Sand
From 1.5 to 2.9 meter : Light grey to brown Weathered Rock
From 2.9 to 4.0 meter : Weathered rock fractured disintegrated
From 4.0 to 6.0 meter : Weathered rock fractured disintegrated
Page 06
BH-06:
From ground surface to 1.0 meter : Light Redish brown Silty Sand
From 1.5 to 4.0 meter : Light Redish brown Silty Sand with weathered rock
From 4.0 to 90 meter : Silty Sand & highly weathered rock
From 9.5 to 10.5 meter : Medium hard grey brown quartzite
BH-07:
From ground surface to 1.0 meter : Filled Light brown Silty Sand
From 1.5 to 4.5 meter : Light brown grey silty sand with gravels
From 4.5 to 6.0 meter : Light redish grey silty sand with gravels
From 6.0 to 8.0 meter : Light grey brown fractured weathered rock
From 8.0 to 11.0 meter : Light grey brown fractured Quartzite
BH-08:
From ground surface to 0.5 meter : Light brown silty sand + Murram
From 1.5 to 3.0 meter : Light brown silty sand + Murram
From 3.0 to 6.0 meter : Light redish brown silty sand
From 6.0 to 9.0 meter : Light redish yellowish silty sand with gravels
From 9.0 to 13.5 meter : Grey brown silty sand with gravels
From 13.5 to 15.0 meter : Grey brown silty sand with weathered rock
BH-09:
From ground surface to 0.5 meter : Redish brown silty sand
From 1.5 to 3.0 meter : Redish yellow silty sand with murram
From 3.0 to 7.5 meter : Light grey brown silty sand with weathered rock
From 7.5 to 10.5 meter : Grey brown quartzite fractured disintegrated
BH-10:
From ground surface to 4.5 meter : Light Redish brown murram silty sand
From 4.5 to 6.0 meter : Grey brown silty sand
From 6.0 to 10.0 meter : Light grey brown silty sand with weathered rock
BH-11:
From ground surface to 0.5 meter : Light Redish brown silty sand
From 1.5 to 3.0 meter : Light Redish brown silty sand with murram
From 3.0 to 6.0 meter : Grey brown silty sand with weathered rock
From 6.0 to 9.0 meter : Hard Grey fractured disintegrated weathered rock
Page 07
BH-12:
From ground surface to 3.0 meter : Light grey brown silty sand
From 3.0 to 4.0 meter : Grey brown silty sand weathered rock
From 4.0 to 7.0 meter : Grey brown fractured weathered rock
BH-13:
From ground surface to 0.5 meter : Redish brown filled up silty sand & gravels
From 1.5 to 4.5 meter : Redish brown silty sand with coarse grained murram
From 7.5 to 13.5 meter : Light redish brown silty sand weathered rock
From 13.5 to 15.0 meter : Light Grey fractured weathered rock
BH-14:
From 3.0 to 6.0 meter : Redish grey silty sand
From 10.5 to 13.5 meter : Baslt fractured broken weathered rock
BH-15:
From 1.5 to 3.0 meter : Redish grey silty sand with garvels
From 7.5 to 10.0 meter : Grey brown graveled weathered rock
BH-16:
From ground surface to 4.5 meter : Light Redish brown silty sand & gravel
From 6.0 to 9.0 meter : Grey brown Quartzite fractured disintegrated
BH-17:
From ground surface to 3.0 meter : Light Redish brown silty sand with coarse grains
From 6.0 to 8.0 meter : Grey blakish weathered rock
From 8.0 to 11.0 meter : Grey brown fractured disintegrated weathered rock
Page 08
BH-18:
From 3.0 to 4.5 meter : Grey yellowish silty sand
From 5.0 to 8.0 meter : Grey yellowish fractured weathered rock
BH-19:
From 3.0 to 4.5 meter : Light red yellowish silty sand with gravels
From 4.5 to 5.5 meter : Grey yellowish silty sand weathered rock
From 5.5 to 8.5 meter : Grey yellowish shale fractured disintegrated
BH-20:
From 3.0 to 4.0 meter : Grey yellowish silty sand weathered rock
From 4.0 to 7.0 meter : Redish brown quartzite fractured disintegrated
BH-21:
From ground surface to 1.5 meter : Light Redish brown silty sand with gravels
From 1.5 to 4.5 meter : Redish brown silty sand with coarse grains
From 8.0 to 10.0 meter : Grey brown fractured weathered rock
BH-22:
From ground surface to 0.5 meter : Light Yellowish brown silty sand
From 1.4 to 2.4 meter : Medium hard yellowish sand stone
From 2.4 to 4.5 meter : Hard yellowish brown sand stone
BH-23:
From ground surface to 2.2 meter : Light Redish murram silty sand
From 2.2 to 3.0 meter : Light redish silty sand with coarse grains
From 3.0 to 4.0 meter : Light redish silty sand weathered rock
From 4.0 to 7.0 meter : Medium hard yellowish sand stone
Page 09
5.3 THE GROUND WATER LEVEL:
The ground water level was not observed in any of the bore hole during boring activities at site.
However, as the proposed structures are important structures and surface water may rise
during heavy rainy season, to ensure the safety of the structure in the worst condition, for
design purposes the ground water table may be considered 0.5 to 1.0 meter above from the
existing position, if prevails below the boring depth.
6.0 Computation of Allowable Bearing Pressure
6.1 General :
The main aim of the Investigations is to determine type of Foundation and placement depth of the
foundation and safe bearing capacity.
For the present investigations one borehole is used at each location as given at Sl. No. 5.0 above.
The Results of the field and laboratory tests are summarized in the Annexure III.
6.2 Open Foundation :
In the present case, considering the subsurface condition, it is proposed to provide open
foundation at depths below from the existing ground level (EGL) 2.5 or 3.0 or 3.5 or 4.0 meter to
rest the foundation on available strata.
6.3 Net Safe Bearing Pressure: Shear Criteria :

For bearing capacity of foundations resting on rock strata, following methods are considered:
i) Presumptive values: IS 12070-1987.
ii) Based on Rock Mass Rating (RMR value): IS 13365 (part I), IS 12070-1987.
iii) Based on compressive strength of intact rock specimen using the procedure given in IS:
12070.
iv) In case of disintegrated and soft variety of rocks, the methods prescribed for soil may be used,
IRC:78-2000.
Determination of Net Bearing Pressure allowable settlement:

For the rock strata, settlement is not governing criteria in general as recommendations for the
allowable bearing pressure accounts for allowable settlement also.
Page 10
6.4 Allowable Bearing Capacity Calculations
6.4.1 : Allowable Bearing Capacity Based On Presumptive Values
For preliminary design these presumptive values may be taken based on the assessment of
experienced engineering geologist taking into consideration the various characteristics of rock
mass. As per Table -2 IS 12070 -1987 the safe bearing pressure is given below:
Material qna (T/m2)
Massive crystalline bed rock including granite, diorite, gneiss, trap rock 1,000
Foliated rocks such as schist or slate in sound condition 400
Bedded lime stone in sound condition 400
Sedimentary rock incl. hard shales and sand stones. 250
Soft or broken rock (excl. shales ) and broken lime stones 100
Shales 30
Corrections To Be Applied:
For getting the allowable bearing pressure the safe bearing pressure obtained from above Table
shall be multiplied with the correction factors according to the geological conditions as per IS:
12070 Clause 9.2.
Correction Factors:
Submerged conditions C1= 0.50 to 0.75 depending upon the aperture of joints.
Orientation of joints C2 = 0.50 to 1.00 for joint orientation, applicable for slopes only.
For the present case the rock is highly weathered rock,
q = 100 T/m2, C1=0.5 and C2=1.0
6.4.2 Allowable Bearing Capacity Based on RMR (IS 12070)

This method for calculation of safe bearing pressure is based on Geo-Mechanics Rock
Classification System known as Rock Mass Rating. Various parameters such as uniaxial
compressive strength, RQD, spacing and condition of discontinuities and ground water condition
etc. are used for quantitative rating of rock mass. The correlation between the RMR value and
allowable pressure is given in Table–3 IS: 12070. This will ensure settlement of raft foundation up
to 6 m to be less than 12 mm.
Page 11
Table 3 of IS-12070, Design & Construction of Shallow Foundation on Rock, gives net allowable
pressure based on RMR values. These values will ensure settlement of foundation to be less than
12 mm.
Estimation of Rock Mass Rating (RMR):
Sl. ITEM AP-28 (BH-01)
No. Value Rating
1 Point Load Strength, MPa 2 to 4 7
2 RQD 50 -75 13
3 Spacing of Discontinuities, m 0.2-0.6 10
4 Condition of Discontinuities <1 mm 25
5 Ground Water Condition Damp 10
6 Adjustment for Joint Orientation Fair -7
Rock Mass Rating (RMR) 58
The present case falls into the Classification III with RMR 41-60.
Hence safe bearing pressure is 151 T/m2.
6.4.3 Allowable Bearing Capacity Based on N-Value

Since the rock is highly weathered with poor core recoveries in the upper strata and low RQD
values, core strength is not used as the criteria. The SPT Test gives N-value >100 (Refusal).
Hence the estimate based on this criteria will be on higher side of the estimate obtained based on
RMR criteria.
6.5 Net Safe Bearing Pressure: Shear Criteria:

The safe bearing capacity, safe bearing pressure and allowable bearing capacity of footings of
various widths at various depths is appended in ANNEXURE 2. The settlement calculations
(considering the subsurface strata as Over consolidated sand strata) and check for the
settlement is also given.
Page 12
7.0 Results, Conclusions and Recommendations
Rectangular/Raft
Size of Foundation: 3.00m x 3.00m (may vary as per the loads)
TABLE – 1: NET SAFE BEARING PRESSURE

Bore Hole No. Depth of Foundation Net Allowable Bearing
below Existing G.L, (m) Pressure (T/m2)
2.50 20
Bore Hole-01 3.50 27
4.50 36
2.50 22
4.50 49
2.50 20
4.50 36
2.50 20
4.50 36
2.50 20
4.50 57
2.50 20
4.50 66
2.50 21
4.50 37
2.50 19
4.50 34
Page 13
(Contd….)
2.50 20
4.50 36
2.50 17
4.50 30
2.50 20
4.50 36
2.50 18
4.50 59
2.50 18
4.50 33
2.50 19
4.50 33
2.50 18
4.50 33
2.50 18
4.50 33
2.50 18
4.50 33
2.50 18
4.50 33
Page 14
(Contd….)
2.50 19
4.50 33
2.50 18
4.50 72
2.50 18
4.50 33
2.50 54
4.50 72
2.50 19
4.50 29
8.0 Limitations
The data obtained is at specific location. The comments given in this report and the opinion
expressed are based on the ground conditions encountered during site investigation and
on the results of tests made in field and in the laboratory. There may however, special
conditions prevailing at the site which have not been disclosed by the investigation and
which have not been taken in to account in the report. Any variation in stratification in any
of the foundation location shall be studied thoroughly before executing the foundation work.
This report is for exclusive use of client and as per the scope and specification instructed
by them verbally or in writing. No other use is anticipated authorized by clients. The report
shall be used only by the client for the project and purposes described herein at the
locations shown by him and explored by us.
The finding and recommendations are valid when the onsite and offsite conditions affecting
the structures in project are not changed due to the actions of man or nature. Professional
judgments presented in this report are based on evaluations of the technical information
gathered, understanding of the proposed construction, and general experience in the
Page 15
geotechnical field. The extent of investigation as well as specific exploration locations were
dictated by the clients.
The findings and recommendations are further based on the assumption that the
subsurface conditions do not deviate appreciably from those reported and those assumed.
In the event of changes in design loads or structural characteristics or in location of the
structure, clients should review its design.
9.0 CLOSURE
We appreciate the opportunity given to us to submit this report. This presented report is based
on observations and tests on samples collected from the boreholes as decided by the client. In
case any difference is noticed in the field subsoil strata and reported subsoil strata during
excavation please contact us before proceeding with further construction.
For
Ultra Geo civil Projects Pvt. Ltd.
(Muneshwar Singh)
Authorised Signatory
Page 16
APPENDIX-I
LOCATION PLAN
Page 17
FIGURE-1: SKETCH PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF BOREHOLES
PROJECT: ROR Line in DN GC Railway Line At GOMOH
Page 18
APPENDIX-II
BORE LOGS
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
APPENDIX-III
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 13
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 21
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
APPENDIX-IV
SBC COMPUTATION &

SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS
Page 67
Safe Bearing Capacity and Settlement Analysis
Project Name Geotechnical Investigation work for Proposed ROR Line in DN GC Railway at GOMOH. Sheet No 1 of 2
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Bore Hole No. BH-01 Depth of Bore Hole : 10.5 m
Calculation of Net Safe Bearing Capacity Based on Shear Parameters (C and ɸ) as per IS: 6403-1981
Safe
Water Factor
Shear Bearing Capacity Unit Bearing
Size of Footing Shape Factors Depth Factors Table of
Parameters Parameters Weight Capacity,
Sr. Corrected Correction Safety
t/m2
No. ɸ'
Length, Width, Depth, C, Nq -
ɸ, ° Nc Nγ Sc Sq Sγ dc dq dγ γ Wγ FOS qnu
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
For Isolated Square footing
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.015 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.86 0.50 2.50 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.015 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.86 0.50 2.50 27
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.015 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.52 1.26 1.26 1.86 0.50 2.50 36
Calculation of Net Safe Bearing Pressure Based on SPT - N Value Summary

Calculation of Net Safe Bearing Pressure Based on Settlement as
Size of Footing Safe Bearing Pressure
Sr. per Fig.9 of IS-8009 (Part 1)-1976 Safe Bearing Capacity
No. Length, Width, Depth,D Settlement from Fig.9 of IS- Recommended (Min.), t/m2
N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 80.0 10.00 25 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 80.0 10.00 35 27
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 80.0 10.00 45 36
Page 68
Project Name Geotechnical Investigation work for Proposed ROR Line in DN GC Railway at GOMOH. Sheet No. 2 of 2
GWT, m Nil
Bore Hole No. BH-01 Depth of Bore Hole, m 10.5
Calculation of Settlement as per IS: 8009- Part-1
Size of Footing Net Allowable

Young's
Sr. Cohesion, Bearing Poission Influence Depth Rigidity
Length Width Depth, D Modulus, Total Settlement, mm
No. Cu, kg/cm2 Pressure, qns, Ratio, μ
Es, T/m2 Factor, I Factor, Rd Factor, Rr
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.015 20 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.49
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.015 27 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 8.16
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.015 36 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 10.56
Page 69
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Safe
Water Factor
t/m2
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 31.00 21.83 16.69 6.69 6.96 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.15 1.15 1.87 0.50 2.50 22

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 100.0 10.00 30 22
Page 70
GWT, m Nil
Bore Hole No. : BH-02 Depth of Bore Hole, m : 9.0

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 22 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 7.14
Page 71
Safe Bearing Pressure of Rock
Project Geotechnical Investigation work for Proposed ROR Line in DN GC Railway at
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Name GOMOH.
GWT, m Nil
Location & Bore Hole No. BH-02 Depth of Bore hole, m 9.0
Calculation of Allowable Bearing Pressure ( As per Clause No. 6 and Clause No. 9, IS : 12070, 1987 )
Average
Spacing of
Width Emperical Co- Uniaxial Allowable
Depth of Discontinuties
of efficient Compressive Other Factors Bearing
Footing as per Table
Footing Table 4 of IS 12070 Strength of Pressure
Sr. 4 of IS 12070
Rock Core
No.
Submerged
Cavities /
Condtion
B, (m) D, (m) S, (cm) Nj, cm qcore, T/m2 Close Joint Slope qsafe, T/m2
Under Water
Spacing
Table
1 3.00 3.5 30 0.100 5912 0.5 0.50 0.33 49
2 3.00 4.5 30 0.100 5912 0.5 0.50 0.33 49
Page 72
Intensity of pressure (based on allowable settlement)
Project Name Geotechnical Investigation work for Proposed ROR Line in DN GC Railway at GOMOH.
Sheet No. 1 of 1
GWT, m Nil
Bore Hole No. BH-02 Depth of Bore hole, m 9.0
Calculation of Intensity of Pressure based on allowable settlement of 12mm
Width Intensity of
Depth of µ (poison's Es (Modulus Immediate Rigidity Depth Corrected
of pressure (q) Other Factors
Sr. Footing ratio) of Elasticity) settlement factor factor settlement
Footing (Assumed)
No.
B, (m) D, (m) T/m² q (T/m²) m Is If (mm) (mm)
1 3.00 3.5 0.30 55000 51.2 4 0.32 1.00 1.6 0.8 0.93 1.21
2 3.00 4.5 0.30 55000 62.8 4 0.32 1.00 2.0 0.8 0.93 1.48
Modulus of Elasticity of rock material, Er

Ed=2xRMR-100 in
Ed=Er.MRF GPa
Es = Modulus of Elasticity of over consolidated soil from SPT N value>100, Es = 40000+1050N)/100

Ref: Table 5.6 of Foundation analysis and Design (by Bowels)
Page 73
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor Safe Bearing

Shear Bearing Capacity Unit
Size of Footing Shape Factors Depth Factors Table of Capacity,
Parameters Parameters Weight
Sr. Corrected Correction Safety t/m2
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.84 0.50 2.50 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.84 0.50 2.50 27
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.52 1.26 1.26 1.84 0.50 2.50 36

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 51.0 10.00 25 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 51.0 10.00 35 27
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 51.0 10.00 45 36
Page 74
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 20 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.49
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 27 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 8.16
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 36 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 10.56
Page 75
GWT from EGL, m Nil

No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 28
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.52 1.26 1.26 1.87 0.50 2.50 36

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 30.0 10.00 25 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 30.0 10.00 35 28
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 30.0 10.00 45 36
Page 76
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 20 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.49
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 28 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 8.47
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 36 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 10.56
Page 77
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Safe
Water Factor
t/m2
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.019 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 20

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 100.0 10.00 25 20
Page 78
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.019 20 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.49
Page 79

Sheet No. 1 of 1
Name GOMOH.
GWT, m Nil
Average
Spacing of
Sr. 4 of IS 12070
Rock Core
No.
Submerged
Cavities /
Condtion
Under Water
Spacing
Table
1 3.00 3.5 30 0.100 6932 0.5 0.50 0.33 57
2 3.00 4.5 30 0.100 6932 0.5 0.50 0.33 57
Page 80
Sheet No. 1 of 1
GWT, m Nil
Width Intensity of
Footing (Assumed)
No.
1 3.00 3.5 0.30 52000 54.2 4 0.32 1.00 1.8 0.8 0.93 1.35
2 3.00 4.5 0.30 52000 66.8 4 0.32 1.00 2.2 0.8 0.93 1.67

Ed=2xRMR-100 in
Ed=Er.MRF GPa

Page 81
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
Shear Bearing Capacity Unit Safe Bearing
Parameters Parameters Weight Capacity, t/m2
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.85 0.50 2.50 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.85 0.50 2.50 28

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 75.0 10.00 25 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 75.0 10.00 35 28
Page 82
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 20 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.49
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 28 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 8.47
Page 83
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Name GOMOH.
GWT, m Nil
Average
Spacing of
Sr. 4 of IS 12070
Rock Core
No.
Submerged
Cavities /
Condtion
Under Water
Spacing
Table
1 3.00 4.5 30 0.100 8053 0.5 0.50 0.33 66
Page 84
Sheet No. 1 of 1
GWT, m Nil
Width Intensity of
Footing (Assumed)
No.
1 3.00 4.5 0.30 61000 68.3 4 0.32 1.00 2.0 0.8 0.93 1.46

Ed=2xRMR-100 in
Ed=Er.MRF GPa

Page 85
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.89 0.50 2.50 21
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.89 0.50 2.50 28
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.020 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.52 1.26 1.26 1.89 0.50 2.50 37

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 20.0 10.00 25 21
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 20.0 10.00 35 28
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 20.0 10.00 45 37
Page 86
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 21 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.82
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 28 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 8.47
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.020 37 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 10.86
Page 87
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Safe
Water Factor
t/m2
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.016 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.74 0.50 2.50 19
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.016 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.74 0.50 2.50 26
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.016 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.52 1.26 1.26 1.74 0.50 2.50 34

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 22.0 10.00 25 19
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 22.0 10.00 35 26
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 22.0 10.00 45 34
Page 88
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.016 19 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.17
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.016 26 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.86
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.016 34 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 9.98
Page 89
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.86 0.50 2.50 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.86 0.50 2.50 28
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.52 1.26 1.26 1.86 0.50 2.50 36

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 52.0 10.00 25 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 52.0 10.00 35 28
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 52.0 10.00 45 36
Page 90
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 20 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.49
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 28 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 8.47
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 36 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 10.56
Page 91
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Safe
Water Factor
t/m2
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 28.00 19.52 14.39 5.10 5.03 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 17
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 28.00 19.52 14.39 5.10 5.03 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.39 1.19 1.19 1.87 0.50 2.50 23
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.020 28.00 19.52 14.39 5.10 5.03 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.87 0.50 2.50 30

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 25.0 10.00 25 17
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 25.0 10.00 35 23
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 25.0 10.00 45 30
Page 92
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 17 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 5.52
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 23 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 6.95
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.020 30 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 8.80
Page 93
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.88 0.50 2.50 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.88 0.50 2.50 28
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.020 30.00 21.05 15.87 6.11 6.24 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.52 1.26 1.26 1.88 0.50 2.50 36

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 64.0 10.00 25 20
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 64.0 10.00 35 28
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 64.0 10.00 45 36
Page 94
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 20 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.49
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 28 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 8.47
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.020 36 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 10.56
Page 95
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.019 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.019 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 25

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 72.0 10.00 25 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 72.0 10.00 35 25
Page 96
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.019 18 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 5.84
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.019 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
Page 97
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Name GOMOH.
GWT, m Nil
Average
Spacing of
Sr. 4 of IS 12070
Rock Core
No.
Submerged
Cavities /
Condtion
Under Water
Spacing
Table
1 3.00 4.5 30 0.100 7135 0.5 0.50 0.33 59
Page 98
Sheet No. 1 of 1
GWT, m Nil
Width Intensity of
Footing (Assumed)
No.
1 3.00 4.5 0.30 60000 66.9 4 0.32 1.00 1.9 0.8 0.93 1.45

Ed=2xRMR-100 in
Ed=Er.MRF GPa

Page 99
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Safe
Water Factor
t/m2
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.51 1.25 1.25 1.87 0.50 2.50 33

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 96.0 10.00 25 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 96.0 10.00 35 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 96.0 10.00 45 33
Page 100
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.019 18 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 5.84
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.019 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.019 33 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 9.68
Page 101
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 19
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.020 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.51 1.25 1.25 1.87 0.50 2.50 33

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 93.0 10.00 25 19
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 93.0 10.00 35 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 93.0 10.00 45 33
Page 102
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 19 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.17
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.020 33 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 9.68
Page 103
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.51 1.25 1.25 1.87 0.50 2.50 33

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 98.0 10.00 25 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 98.0 10.00 35 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 98.0 10.00 45 33
Page 104
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 18 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 5.84
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 33 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 9.68
Page 105
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.016 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.016 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.016 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.51 1.25 1.25 1.87 0.50 2.50 33

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 71.0 10.00 25 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 71.0 10.00 35 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 71.0 10.00 45 33
Page 106
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.016 18 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 5.84
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.016 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.016 33 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 9.68
Page 107
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Safe
Water Factor
t/m2
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.017 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.017 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.017 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.51 1.25 1.25 1.87 0.50 2.50 33

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 52.0 10.00 25 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 52.0 10.00 35 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 52.0 10.00 45 33
Page 108
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.017 18 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 5.84
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.017 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.017 33 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 9.68
Page 109
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.51 1.25 1.25 1.87 0.50 2.50 33

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 61.0 10.00 25 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 61.0 10.00 35 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 61.0 10.00 45 33
Page 110
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 18 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 5.84
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.018 33 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 9.68
Page 111
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.019 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.88 0.50 2.50 19
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.019 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.88 0.50 2.50 26
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.019 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.51 1.25 1.25 1.88 0.50 2.50 33

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 75.0 10.00 25 19
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 75.0 10.00 35 26
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 75.0 10.00 45 33
Page 112
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.019 19 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.17
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.019 26 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.86
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.019 33 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 9.68
Page 113
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.88 0.50 2.50 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.88 0.50 2.50 25

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 100.0 10.00 25 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 100.0 10.00 35 25
Page 114
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.018 18 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 5.84
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.018 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
Page 115
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Name GOMOH.
GWT, m Nil
Average
Spacing of
Sr. 4 of IS 12070
Rock Core
No.
Submerged
Cavities /
Condtion
Under Water
Spacing
Table
1 3.00 4.5 30 0.100 8766 0.5 0.50 0.33 72
Page 116
Sheet No. 1 of 1
GWT, m Nil
Width Intensity of
Footing (Assumed)
No.
1 3.00 4.5 0.30 72000 69.2 4 0.32 1.00 1.7 0.8 0.93 1.25

Ed=2xRMR-100 in
Ed=Er.MRF GPa

Page 117
GWT from EGL, m Nil
Water Factor
No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.017 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.017 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.017 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.51 1.25 1.25 1.87 0.50 2.50 33

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 39.0 10.00 25 18
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 39.0 10.00 35 25
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 39.0 10.00 45 33
Page 118
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.017 18 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 5.84
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.017 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
3 3.00 3.00 4.50 0.017 33 0.35 4500 0.95 0.66 0.80 9.68
Page 119
Sheet No. 1 of 1
Name GOMOH.
GWT, m Nil
Average
Spacing of
Sr. 4 of IS 12070
Rock Core
No.
Submerged
Cavities /
Condtion
Under Water
Spacing
Table
1 3.00 2.5 30 0.100 6524 0.5 0.50 0.33 54
2 3.00 3.5 30 0.100 6932 0.5 0.50 0.33 57
3 3.00 4.5 30 0.100 8766 0.5 0.50 0.33 72
Page 120
Sheet No. 1 of 1
GWT, m Nil
Width Intensity of
Footing (Assumed)
No.
1 3.00 2.5 0.30 42000 41.2 4 0.32 1.00 1.7 0.8 0.93 1.28
2 3.00 3.5 0.30 42000 45.8 4 0.32 1.00 1.9 0.8 0.93 1.42
3 3.00 4.5 0.30 42000 53.7 4 0.32 1.00 2.2 0.8 0.93 1.66

Ed=2xRMR-100 in
Ed=Er.MRF GPa

Page 121
GWT from EGL, m Nil

No. ɸ'
L (m) B (m) D (m) kg/cm2 1
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.28 1.14 1.14 1.87 0.50 2.50 19
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 29.00 20.28 15.10 5.58 5.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.87 0.50 2.50 25

N-Value qnp, t/m2
L (m) B (m) (m) 8009 (Part 1)-1976
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 96.0 10.00 25 19
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 96.0 10.00 35 25
Page 122
GWT, m Nil

Young's
L, m B, m (m) t/m2
1 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.020 19 0.35 4500 0.95 0.73 0.80 6.17
2 3.00 3.00 3.50 0.020 25 0.35 4500 0.95 0.68 0.80 7.56
Page 123

Sheet No. 1 of 1
Name GOMOH.
GWT, m Nil
Average
Spacing of
Sr. 4 of IS 12070
Rock Core
No.
Submerged
Cavities /
Condtion
Under Water
Spacing
Table
1 3.00 4.5 30 0.100 3465 0.5 0.50 0.33 29
Page 124
Sheet No. 1 of 1
GWT, m Nil
Width Intensity of
Footing (Assumed)
No.
1 3.00 4.5 0.30 44000 54.6 4 0.32 1.00 2.2 0.8 0.93 1.61

Ed=2xRMR-100 in
Ed=Er.MRF GPa

Page 125
APPENDIX-V
ABBREVIATIONS
Page 126
Symbols
C Cohesion Sc Shape Factor
Φ Angle of Internal Friction of soil Sq Shape Factor
DS Disturbed Sample Sγ Shape Factor
UDS Undisturbed Sample γ Density of Soil
SPT Standard Penetration Test D Depth of Foundation
NMC Natural Moisture Content FS Factor of Safety
NP Non Plastic Soils Cv Coefficient of Consolidation
G Specific Gravity GC Clayey Gravels
M Silt Content GP Poorly Graded Gravels
S Sand Content GW Well Graded Gravels
C Clay Content SC Clayey Sand
LL Liquid Limit SM Silty Sand
PL Plastic Limit SW Well Graded Sand
PI Plasticity Index SP Poorly Graded Sand
Cc Compression Index CH Clays of High Plasticity
N SPT Value CI Clays of Intermediate Plasticity
BH Bore Hole CL Clays of Low Plasticity
WR Weathered Rock FD Filled Up Soil
CR Core Recovery RQD Rock Quality Designation
Page 127
APPENDIX-VI
REFERENCES
Page 128
References
1 IS 1122 Method of Test for Determination of True Specific Gravity of Natural Building
Stones
2 IS 1124 Method of Test for Determination of Water Absorption, Apparent Specific
Gravity and Porosity of Natural Building Stones
3 IS 1498 Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes
4 IS 1892 Code of practice for subsurface investigation for foundations
5 IS 1904 Code of practice for design and construction of foundations in soils: General
requirements
6 IS 2131 Method of standard penetration test for soils
7 IS 2132 Code of practice for thin walled tube sampling of soils
8 IS 2720 (P-1) Methods of test for soils: Part 1 Preparation of dry soil samples for various
tests
9 IS 2720 (P-2) Methods of test for soils: Part 2 Determination of water content
10 IS 2720 (P-3/Sec-1) Methods of test for soils: Part 3 Determination of specific gravity, Section 1
Fine grained soils
11 IS 2720 (P-3/Sec-2) Methods of test for soils: Part 3 Determination of specific gravity, Section 2
Fine, medium and coarse grained soils
12 IS 2720 (P-4) Methods of test for soils: Part 4 Grain size analysis
13 IS 2720 (P-5) Methods of test for soils: Part 5 Determination of liquid and plastic limit
14 IS 2720 (P-6) Methods of test for soils: Part 6 Determination of shrinkage factors
15 IS 2720 (P-10) Methods of test for soils: Part 10 Determination of unconfined compressive
strength
16 IS 2720 (P-11) Methods of test for soils: Part 11 Determination of the shear strength
parameters of a specimen tested in unconsolidated undrained triaxial
compression without the measurement of pore water pressure
17 IS 2720 (P-13) Methods of test for soils: Part 13 Direct shear test
18 IS 2720 (P-14) Methods of test for soils: Part 14 Determination of density index (relative
density) of cohesionless soils
Page 129
19 IS 2720 (P-15) Methods of test for soils: Part 15 Determination of consolidation properties
20 IS 2720 (P-39/Sec-1) Methods of test for soils: Part 39 Direct shear test for soils containing gravel,
Section 1 Laboratory test
21 IS 2720 (P-39/Sec-2) Methods of test for soils: Part 39 Direct shear test for soils containing gravel,
Section 2 In-situ shear test
22 IS 8764 Method Of Determination Of Point Load Strength Index Of Rocks
23 IS 9143 Method of Determination of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Rock

Materials
24 IS 9179 Method For The Preparation Of Rock Specimen For Laboratory Testing
25 IS 12070 Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Shallow Foundations on

Rocks
26 IS 13030 Method of Test of Laboratory Determination of Water Content, Porosity and
Density.
27 IS 13063 Code of Practice for Structural Safety of Buildings on Shallow Foundations of
Rocks
1. Peck R.B, Hanson W. E., & Thornburn T.H. : Foundation Engineering, Asia Publishing House,
1962.
2. Murthy V.N.S. : Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, Dhanpat Rai & Sons, Delhi,1974
3. Nayak N.V., Foundation Design Manual, Dhanpat Rai & Sons
4. Saran, Swami, : Analysis & Design of substructure – Oxford IBH Publications
5. Alam Singh - Soil Engineering in Theory & Practice: Vol-I and II, CBS Publications
6. Tomlinson, J., Foundation Engineering, ELBS Publications
7. Bhawani Singh & R K Goel- Engineering Rock Mass Classification
8. Joseph E. Bowles – Foundation analysis and Design
Page 130

Final Geotech Report (Gomoh)

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Final Geotech Report (Gomoh)

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Neel Construction Links Pvt. Ltd.

total support for your project

Report No. : 18-111

Dy CE Construction / GOMOH E.C. Railway

M/s. Ultra Geo Civil Projects Private Limited

3. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 2-3

4. LABORATORY WORK 4-5

5. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS 6-9

6. COMPUTATIONS OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY 10-12

7. RESULTS, CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS 13-14

APPENDIX-I: LOCATION PLAN 17-18

APPENDIX-II: BORELOGS 19-42

APPENDIX-III: LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 43-66

APPENDIX-IV: SAFE BEARING CAPACITY 67-125

APPENDIX-V: ABBREVIATIONS 126-127

APPENDIX-VI: REFERENCES 128-130

APPENDIX-VII: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 42

3.2 Setting Out Locations

3.3 Standard Penetration Test

3.4 Undisturbed Soil Sample

3.6 Ground Water Table

3.7 Protection, Handling and Labeling of Sample

a) Undisturbed Sample: As per IS 1892:1979-Annexure-E, samples which are

b) Disturbed sample: As per IS 1892:1979-Annexure-E, immediately after being

2. Determination of Strength Properties of soil for determination of bearing capacity of

LABORATORY TESTING: (ROCK SAMPLES)

5.2 Site Stratigraphy

6.0 Computation of Allowable Bearing Pressure

6.2 Open Foundation :

6.3 Net Safe Bearing Pressure: Shear Criteria :

Determination of Net Bearing Pressure allowable settlement:

6.4.1 : Allowable Bearing Capacity Based On Presumptive Values

Material qna (T/m2)

Foliated rocks such as schist or slate in sound condition 400

Bedded lime stone in sound condition 400

Sedimentary rock incl. hard shales and sand stones. 250

6.4.2 Allowable Bearing Capacity Based on RMR (IS 12070)

6.4.3 Allowable Bearing Capacity Based on N-Value

6.5 Net Safe Bearing Pressure: Shear Criteria:

TABLE – 1: NET SAFE BEARING PRESSURE

PROJECT: ROR Line in DN GC Railway Line At GOMOH

SBC COMPUTATION &

For Isolated Square footing

Calculation of Net Safe Bearing Pressure Based on SPT - N Value Summary

Bore Hole No. BH-01 Depth of Bore Hole, m 10.5

Calculation of Settlement as per IS: 8009- Part-1

Size of Footing Net Allowable

For Isolated Square footing

Calculation of Net Safe Bearing Pressure Based on SPT - N Value Summary

Bore Hole No. : BH-02 Depth of Bore Hole, m : 9.0

Calculation of Settlement as per IS: 8009- Part-1

Size of Footing Net Allowable

1 3.00 3.5 30 0.100 5912 0.5 0.50 0.33 49

2 3.00 4.5 30 0.100 5912 0.5 0.50 0.33 49

Calculation of Intensity of Pressure based on allowable settlement of 12mm

B, (m) D, (m) T/m² q (T/m²) m Is If (mm) (mm)

Modulus of Elasticity of rock material, Er

Es = Modulus of Elasticity of over consolidated soil from SPT N value>100, Es = 40000+1050N)/100

Water Factor Safe Bearing

For Isolated Square footing

Calculation of Net Safe Bearing Pressure Based on SPT - N Value Summary

1 3.00 3.00 2.50 51.0 10.00 25 20

2 3.00 3.00 3.50 51.0 10.00 35 27