ANNEXURE-2

FORMS

(ALL DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED IN TRIPLICATE

AND SIGNED IN BLUE INK)
 PART-I
Proposal for Investigation and Survey in the National Park/Sanctuary
(Details to be provided by the Applicant)

1 Name of the Organization : Border Road Organization.

HQ 752 BRTF

2 Aims and Objectives of the Proposed : Widening of existing Roing - Hunli Road from
Project Cl-9 specification to NHDL specification from
Km 6.00 and Km 16.00.

3 Location and Map (1:50,000 scale) of the : 82 P/15 and 82 P/16 Enclosed.
area duly authenticated by the competent
authority to be investigated/surveyed

4 Whether investigation/survey requires : Clearing of vegetation not required as the

clearing of vegetation
5 If yes, please specify the extent (in Ha.)
6 Opinion of the Officer In Charge of the :
NP/WLS (Attach signed copy).
project does not falls in wild life area. Mehao
wild life santury is 25 mtr away from project
area.
: Does not arise.

6 Opinion of the Chief Wildlife Warden (Attach :

signed copy). The following be included in
the opinion:

i) Brief history of the protected area :

ii) Current status of wildlife :
iii) Current status of pressures on :
protected areas
iv) Projected impacts of projects on :
wildlife, habitat management and
access/use of resources by various
stakeholders

v) Contiguous wildlife areas which :

would benefit wildlife if added to
national park/sanctuary

vi) Other areas in the State which have :

been recommended by State
Government, Wildlife Institute of
India, BNHS, SACON, IISC, IUCN
or other expert body for inclusion in
protected area network

signed signed signed

Project Head The Officer In Charge of the NP/WLS The CWLW
Name Office Seal Office Seal
Organization
ctuary

- Hunli Road from

L specification from

ot required as the
ld life area. Mehao
away from project
 PART-II
(To be field in by the Applicant)

1 Project details:

(i) Copy of the Investigation and Survey report. : The road is already existing as
(The report should include the dates of survey and specification. The proposed work for impro
the names of the investigators, surveyors and all widening of existing Roing-Hunli road from
officials of the concerned NP/WLS who remained to 16.00 does not fall in wildlife sanct
present during the period) Survey of the proposed road constr projec
carried out by DFO Mehao willife sanctury
Roing & DFO Dibang Forest Divison in y
accrodingly in principle (Stage-I) approval
clearance has already been granted b
Northeastern Regional Office Shillong vide
3-AN C 041/2013-SHI/1681-82 dated 12
(Copy enclosed).

(ii) Self contained and factual project report for which : All district HQs are to be linked with roads
NP/WLS area is required. specification as per SARDP programme of
(Enclose copy of the Project Appraisal document) as well as Infrastructural develop of the are

(iii) Map (duly authenticated by the Divisional/District : Enclosed.

Head of the Department dealing with Forests and
Wildlife) on a scale of 1:50,000 showing the
boundaries of the NP/WLS, delineating the area in
question in red color).
(iv) Self contained and factual report of at least two : The road exists since year 1975 for 6.10
alternatives considered by the project authorities This is the only road connecting to Diban
along with technical and financial justification for On detailed survey of the area it is found
opting national park/sanctuary area road project does not falls in NP/WLS. Ho
road project is 25 mtr away from Meha
sanctury.

(v) Copy of the Bio diversity Impact Assessment report : Not required as the road project does n
in case the proposal involves diversion of more wildlife area.
than 50 ha. NP/WALS area.
2 Location of the project/scheme

(i) State/Union Territory : Arunachal Pradesh

(ii) District : Lower Dibang Valley
(iii) Name of the National Park/Sanctuary : 25 Mtr away from Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary

3 Details of the area required (in Hectares only) : No wildlife sanctury /National Park area inv

(Providing break up of the land use under the project, e.g. Construction of dam, submergence, ho
staff, road etc.)

4 Details of displacement of people, if any, due to the :

project

(i) Total number of families involved in displacement : Nil

 (ii) Number of scheduled caste/scheduled tribe families : Nil
involved in displacement
(iii) Detailed rehabilitation plan : Does not arise in view as stated above

5 Any other information relevant to proposal but not : No.

covered in any of the columns above.

Signed by

Project Head
Name
Organization

Date of submission to the Head of the National Park/Sanctuary

 sting as per Cl-9
ork for improvement /
nli road from Km 6.00
wildlife sanctury area.
constr project already
llife sanctury division,
Divison in year 2011
e-I) approval for Forest
n granted by MOEF
Shillong vide letter No.
2 dated 12 Sep 2014

d with roads of NHDL

ogramme of MORT&H
op of the area.

75 for 6.10 Mtr width.

ng to Dibang District.
ea it is found that the
NP/WLS. However the
from Mehao Wildlife

oject does not fall in

ife Sanctuary

Park area involved.

mergence, housing for

d above
 Part III 23
PART-III

(To be completed by the Officer-In-Charge of the National Park/Sanctuary completed and submitte
Chief Wild Life Warden or officer authorized by him in this behalf within 30 days of the receipt of P

1 Details of receipt of the PART-II :

2 Total Area (Ha.) of national park/sanctuary : No Wildlife sanctury /National Pa
involved.

3 Total Area (Ha.) diverted from the NP/WLS so far for : 3.60 Ha for WLS area diverted for
development purpose of adjacent road sector Km 2.00 to
Roing-Hunli road from existing single
NHDL specifications.

4 List the past projects and the area (Ha.) diverted : Tabulated as under

Name of Project Area Diverted Year of Diversion

Widening of road Roing-
Hunli between Km 2.00 to
6.00 from existing single
lane specn to double lane
specn.
3.60 Ha AIP (Stage-I) approval has been a
vide CCF(Cons) & Nodal Oficer (FC
No. FOR-3-115/Cons/2009/Pt-I/231-3
25 Feb 2016 (copy enclosed) and
approval accorded vide CCF(Cons)
Oficer (FCA) letter No.
115/Cons/2009/Pt-I/43-48 dated 10 F
(copy enclosed).

5 Positive impact(s) due to the diversion of area for the :

project referred to in column 4 above

Name of the Project (s) Positive Impact Scientific Basis of Assessme

Widening of road Roing- Providing connectivity to Border areas Widening of road will provide safe and
Hunli between Km 2.00 to in Dibang Valley Region and to moment of traffic and defence vehicle
6.00 from existing single improve socio economic development important road axis conneting to bord
lane specn to double lane of area. Easy approach of tourist along Inod China Border.
specn. visiting sanctury area. Less blockage in
rainy season due to land slide.

(Attach separate sheet, if required)

6 Negative impact/s due to the diversion of area for the : Does not arise as the road is exist
projects referred to in column 4 above and work invlovs project does no
Wildlife sanctuary area.
Name of the Project (s) Negative Impact Scientific Basis of Assessmen
Widening of road Roing- Chances of killing Wildlife due to Widening of road will result spee
Hunli between Km 2.00 to speeding of vehicles. Damages to vehicles travelling on the road.
6.00 from existing single habited during constr perioed falling of
lane specn to double lane trees during construction Phase.
specn.

(Attach separate sheet, if required)

 Part III 23
7 Management Plan Period : Not required as proposed road project
(Attachment copy of the Management Plan/Management not falls inside wild life sanctuary / Na
Scheme/Recommendation of Chief Wildlife Warden) park area.

8 List Management actions taken/proposed to be taken in : The proposed road falls under Eco
the whole block/Zone in which the proposed area is zone & as per M plan the proposed
located are nataure trail development of infras
Eco-tourism as per chapter VII of M pl
9 Type of forest in which the proposed area falls : Tropical semi evergreen Forests w
forest density (0.20 density)

10 Location of the proposed area w.r.t. the critical/intensive : The proposed road area does not fal
wildlife management areas/ wildlife habitats (attach Map WLS area. But the project is 25 m
to scale) Mehao Wild life Sancturary.
11 List the likely POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE impact/s of the : Positive Impact - (i) Easy appr
proposed project giving scientific and technical santuary areas. (2) Less blocked
justification for each impact season due to land slides.
Negative Impacts- There will be n
negative impact as proposed project
fall in NP/WLS area. But as the Meh
Life Sancturay is 25 mtr from Proj
there may be chances of killing of wil
to speeding vehicles.

12 Provide COMPREHENSIVE details of the impact of the :
proposal in terms of sections 29 and/or section 35 (6) of
the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 as the case may be
The road exists prior to declaration
forest as wildlife sanctury. It is the onl
Dibang District Mehao RF was no
WLS in December 1980, where as t
was existing prior to that to width of 6.

13 Whether the project authorities have ever committed : No violation of wildlife protection A
violation of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 or Forest delected by project authorities.
Conservation Act, 1980. If yes, provide the EXHAUSTIVE
details of the offence and the present status of the case.
(Concealing or misrepresenting the facts will lead to
rejection of the case in addition to any other penalty as
prescribe under Law)

14 Have you examined the Project Appraisal document and : The road exists prior to Notification o
the alternatives as provided in PART-II ? RF as Mahao wildlife Sanctuary. The
any alternate road to Anini the
headquarter of Dibang Valley Di
Arunachal Pradesh State.

15 Have you examined the Bio diversity Impact Assessment : No

Report ?

16 If yes, please give your comments on the : Does not arise. As the present propos
recommendations given in the report ? not falls with in NP / WLS area.
 Part III 23
17 Dates and duration of your field visits to the proposed site : Joint inspection was conducted
________

18 Do you agree that the present proposal of diversion of : Diversion of NP/ WLS area not
NP/WLS area is the best or the only option and is viable However, Mehao Wild life Sanctuary
from Project boundary.

19 Any other information that you would like to bring to the : Nothing worth mentioning.
notice of the State Board for Wildlife, National Board for
Wildlife or its Standing Committee that may be relevant
and assist in decision making

20 Do you recommend the project : Yes. The proposal for diversion of

recommended as the orad exists to
width. By development to NHDL spe
no major impact on WLS is expecte
road project does not falls in NP/ WLS

(Please provide full justification to support your recommendations)

Signed by

The Officer In Charge of the NP/WLS

Office Seal
Date of submission to Chief Wild Life Warden or any other officer authorized by him in this regard
 Part III 23

ed and submitted to the

the receipt of PART-II)

y /National Park area

ea diverted for widening

tor Km 2.00 to 6.000 of
m existing single lane to

Diversion
val has been accorded
odal Oficer (FCA) letter
/2009/Pt-I/231-36 dated
enclosed) and Stage-II
de CCF(Cons) & Nodal
etter No. FOR-3-
3-48 dated 10 Feb 2017

is of Assessment
provide safe and smooth
defence vehicles in this
onneting to border areas
der.

he road is existing road

project does not fall in
a.
is of Assessment
will result speeding of
the road.
 Part III 23
sed road project does
e sanctuary / National

falls under Eco-tourism

n the proposed activites
opment of infrastures for
apter VII of M plan.
een Forests with open
ensity)

rea does not falls in NP/

project is 25 mtr from
urary.
(i) Easy approach to
Less blocked in rainy
des.
There will be no direct
oposed project does not
But as the Mehao Wild
mtr from Project area
s of killing of wildlife due

r to declaration of this
tury. It is the only road to
ao RF was notified as
980, where as this road
hat to width of 6.10 mtr.

ife protection Act 1972

uthorities.

to Notification of Mahao
Sanctuary. There is no
to Anini the district
ang Valley District in
tate.

e present proposal does

WLS area.
 Part III 23
as conducted on dt

WLS area not involved.

d life Sanctuary is 25 mtr
y.

or diversion of WLS is
orad exists to 6.10 mtr
nt to NHDL specificaiton
WLS is expected as the
falls in NP/ WLS aera.

s)

s regard
 PART IV

(To be completed by the Chief Wildlife Warden within 15 days of the receipts of
PART-II and PART-III)

1 Date of Receipt of PART-II and Part-III by the chief :

Wildlife Warden of the officer authorized by him in this
regard

2 Do you agree with the information and :

recommendations provided by the Officer-In-Charge in
PART-III?

3 If not, please provide the reasons :

4 Have you visited the site yourself and held discussions :

with the applicant?

5 Do you agree that the present proposal for permitting :

use of NP/WLS area is the best option or the only
option, and is viable?

6 Please provide specific comments w.r.t. Section 29 of :

the Wild Life (Protection) Act.1972.

7 Any other information that you would like to bring to the :

notice of the State Board for Wildlife, National Board for
Wildlife or its Standing Committee that may be relevant
and assit in decision making

8 Do you recommend the project? :

(Please provide full justification to support your recommendations)

9 Conditions, if any, to be ensured in the interest of :

protection and conservation of wildlife for allowing of the
area?

Signed by

The Chief Wildlife Warden

Name
State
Official Seal

Date of submission to the State Government

 PART V

(To be completed by the Department in Charge of Forestry and Wildlife in consultation with the
State Board for Wild Life with in 30 days of the receipt of PART-II, PART-III and PART-IV)

1 Date of RECEIPT of PART-II, PART-III and PART-IV by :

the Department

2 Do you agree with the recommendation(s) of the Chief :

Wildlife Warden

3 If not, please provide the reasons :

4 Did you provide the PART-ii, PART-III and PART-IV to :

the members of the State Board for Wild Life?

5 Attach copy of the opinion of the State Board for Wild :

Life

6 Give details of the recommendations of the state Govt. :

Signed by

The Principal Secretary

Name
State
Official Seal

Date of submission to the Central Government

ultation with the
nd PART-IV)
 Appendix -"'B"
MARKET RATE OF SUPPLY
S/No NAME OF SIPPLIER RATE QUOTED BY THE SUPPLIER
S/Chips S/Chips S/Metal S/Key Sand (
13.20 mm 11.20 mm 63-45 mm agge Rs /
( Rs / ( Rs / 13.20 mm Cum)
Cum) ( Rs / Cum) ( Rs /
Cum) Cum)

1 M/S KABANG GAMO AGENCY LTD 2300 2300 1950 2300 1500

2 NABAM TADAP AGENCY 2350 2350 2010 2350 1560

3 M/S K.G. STONE CRUSHER 2400 2450 1990 2450 1680

Presiding Officer : _____________________________________________

Lt Col Nandan Bora
OC, 103 RCC (GREF)

Member : 1. _____________________________________________
Shri J.S.Bishit, AE (Civ)
2IC, 62 RCC (GREF)

2. ___________________________________________
Shri Katre Pawan Kumar
JE (Civ), 62 RCC (GREF).
 Appendix -"'B"
MARKET RATE OF SUPPLY
S/No NAME OF SIPPLIER RATE QUOTED BY THE SUPPLIER
S/Chips S/Chips S/Metal S/Key Sand (
13.20 mm 11.20 mm 63-45 mm agge Rs /
( Rs / ( Rs / 13.20 mm Cum)
Cum) ( Rs / Cum) ( Rs /
Cum) Cum)

1 M/S N. MEYA ENTERPRISES 1950 1980 1710 1950 1300

2 M/S ANDIKU ENTERPRISES 1880 1880 1650 1880 1260

3 M/S ANASHI ENTERPRISES 1930 1950 1725 1930 1290

Presiding Officer : _____________________________________________

Lt Col Nandan Bora
OC, 103 RCC (GREF)

Member : 1. _____________________________________________
Shri J.S.Bishit, AE (Civ)
2IC, 62 RCC (GREF)

2. ___________________________________________
Shri Bijender Singh
JE (Civ),487 RMPL/ 62 RCC (GREF).
 Appendix -"'B"
MARKET RATE OF SUPPLY
S/No NAME OF SIPPLIER RATE QUOTED BY THE SUPPLIER
S/Chips S/Chips S/Metal S/Key Sand (
13.20 mm 11.20 mm 63-45 mm agge Rs /
( Rs / ( Rs / 13.20 mm Cum)
Cum) ( Rs / Cum) ( Rs /
Cum) Cum)

1 M/S ANDIKU ENTERPRISES

2 M/S N. MEYA ENTERPRISES

3 M/S ANASHI ENTERPRISES

Presiding Officer : _____________________________________________

Lt Col Nandan Bora
OC, 103 RCC (GREF)

Member : 1. _____________________________________________
Shri J.S.Bishit, AE (Civ)
2IC, 62 RCC (GREF)

2. ___________________________________________
Shri Bijender Singh
JE (Civ),487 RMPL/ 62 RCC (GREF).
PPLIER
F/Wood
( Rs /
Cum)

1610

1675

1650

________________

________________
PPLIER
F/Wood
( Rs /
Cum)

1450

1350

1380

_____________

________________

________________
PPLIER
F/Wood
( Rs /
Cum)

________________

________________