Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PR I VAT E R E A L ES TAT E
I N V ES T M EN TS
A GUIDE FOR
ACCREDITED
INVESTORS
I N TROD UC T I ON
Don’t fall in love with an asset, the saying goes — a reminder that real estate
investment properties aren’t possessions to collect at any price but, rather,
need to make financial sense. Beautiful properties don’t always make great real
estate investments, just as ugly properties don’t always make bad real estate
investments. It’s easy to let intuition get in the way of making sound decisions,
with glossy brochures that highlight charming properties, but yet rarely offer
investors the true picture of what they’re getting into. It’s important to fall in
love with the investment returns, but not the asset itself.
This guide will help the accredited investor move beyond brochures and conduct
a due diligence process that gives them confidence in the asset manager’s
business plan and assures alignment with their personal investment goals. It will
also help investors understand the types of risk managers encounter in private
real estate, the most common forecasting metrics, and the fees managers
collect during the complex, multiyear investing process.
TA B LE OF CONTENTS
In real estate investing, there are different risks They can also encounter entitlement risk, the
associated with each type of property. For chance that government agencies with jurisdiction
instance, there’s always demand for apartments over a project won’t issue the required approvals
in good and bad economies, so multifamily real to allow the project to proceed; environmental
estate is considered a low-risk investment. But risks that range from soil contamination to
for that reason, apartment buildings often yield pollution; budget overruns and more, such as
lower returns. Office buildings are less sensitive political and workforce risks.
to consumer demand than shopping malls, while
hotels, with the reliance on seasonal tourism and Location is another idiosyncratic risk factor.
business travel, pose far more risk than either For example, buildings behind Chicago’s Wrigley
multifamily or office investments. Field used for private rooftop parties went
from boom to bust investments when a new
3 . I D I O S Y N C R AT I C R I S K
scoreboard completely obliterated their views,
while property values near The 606, Chicago’s
Some risks are specific to the asset and the version of the New York’s High Line, are rising.
asset’s business plan, which makes them
particular to a certain situation — or idiosyncratic. A seemingly safe and passive investment is
Every individual deal is subject to idiosyncratic also subject to idiosyncratic risk. Tenant credit
risks. Construction, for example, will add risk to a can change quickly and can make or break an
project because it limits the capacity for collecting investment opportunity. Tenant bankruptcy
rents during this time. And when developing a examples have become commonplace in the
property from the ground up, investors take on retail real estate sector, for example, as brick
more types of risk than just the construction risk. and mortar stores have been decimated by the
competition of internet commerce.
5. CREDIT RISK
As demand for space in the market drives lease The more leverage (debt) on an investment, the
rates higher in older properties, it’s only a matter more risky it is and the more investors should
of time before those lease rates justify new demand in return. Leverage is a force multiplier:
construction and increase supply risk. What if It can move a project along quickly and increase
a new building makes the investment property returns if things are going well, but if a project’s
obsolete because there’s a better facility with loans are under stress — typically when its
comparable rents? It may not be possible for return on assets isn’t enough to cover interest
an investor to raise rents, or even attain decent payments — investors tend to lose a lot quickly.
occupancy rates. Evaluating this situation calls for So in general, investments that are capitalized
understanding a property’s replacement cost to with more debt should project a higher return on
know if it’s economically feasible for a new building equity investment.
to come along and steal away those tenants.
In example A below, we illustrate the difference in
To figure out replacement cost, investors should return on equity when using 85% debt versus 70%.
consider a property’s asset class, location and sub- The project financed with 85% debt requires only
market in that location. This helps investors know if $3 million of equity and generates a total return
rent can rise high enough to make new construction on equity of 121%, while the project financed
viable. For instance, if a 20-year-old apartment with 70% debt requires $6 million of equity and
building is able to lease apartments at a rate that generates a total return of 65%.
would justify new construction, competition may
very well come along in the form of newly built
offerings. It may not be possible to raise rents or
maintain occupancy in the older building.
E X A M PL E A : D E B T ’ S I M PAC T O N
EQUITY IN A POSITIVE MARKET
85% LEVERAGE 70% LEVERAGE
E X A M P L E B : D E B T ’ S I M PAC T O N
EQUIT Y WITH A 5% MARKET DECLINE
85% LEVERAGE 70% LEVERAGE
An annualized total return is the average amount against the equity multiple track record to
of money earned by a real estate investment determine how much actual wealth the manager
each year. Many investors mistakenly compare created for investors.
IRR to the annualized return to make investment
decisions, which can be a costly mistake. Private In example C below, we look at two $100,000
equity real estate investors can find many investment scenarios. In both, investors had their
impressive IRRs available on short-term deals. money tied up for three years, but the investor
But investors must pay close attention to the in the second scenario made far more than the
time period it took to achieve the IRR and the real other, despite both scenarios generating a 15%
wealth that was created by using IRR in context IRR. The first scenario produced a 28.5% total
with the multiple on invested equity. gain on equity, as compared to a 52% total gain
on equity in the second scenario. In scenario one,
For example, a 30% IRR over three months works the investor would have needed to immediately
out to a total return of only 7.5%. However, real invest any cash flow they received into other
estate is not a liquid investment. Its true potential investments. However, it’s impossible to predict
and return on investment is not in short-term what investments will be available in the future
profits, but in holding for the long term. It’s better and it takes time, energy and discipline to find a
to have the investor’s capital generate a 12% suitable place to reinvest distributions.
annualized return over three years than an 18%
IRR over three months. To be fair to the concept of IRR, getting money
back sooner rather than later helps reduce risk.
Chasing high IRR with investments that have Cash flows that happen far out in the future
short durations is one of the biggest mistakes are generally riskier than cash flows that are
investors make. Before an investor commits to expected to occur earlier. And, cash flow would
a private real estate investment, they should presumably be invested into other investments at
evaluate the manager’s past IRR track record the time it is received.
E X A M P L E C : T W O $1 0 0 K I N V E S T M E N T S , B O T H G E N E R AT I N G A 1 5 % I R R
SCENARIO #2
Year three cash flow + $28,500 Year three cash flow + $152,000
H O W I R R C A N B E M A N I P U L AT E D
IRR is calculated using dollars that flow to and extend them affordable credit. Subscription lines
from investors. The shorter duration between generally mature at the same time the fund’s
contributions and distributions, the higher investment period ends, which can be three to five
the IRR. IRR is susceptible to manipulation by years after the fund’s final close.
managers because they have the ability to
influence the timing of cash flows. This makes it A manager can manipulate IRR by funding deals
difficult to tell the difference between managers directly through the subscription line and then
who create value and managers who financially holding the deal there for as long as possible
engineer returns. instead of calling capital from investors. A
manager can delay calling capital for years with
The most common abuse in manufacturing IRR a flexible subscription line. This greatly enhances
amongst fund managers involves the use of a the investment’s official IRR at the expense of the
subscription line, which is a credit facility provided investor, who sits on their capital commitment
by a bank that is collateralized against investor and pays fees while the manager loads up the
commitments. Fund managers use subscription subscription line with deals. Even worse, managers
lines to close on deals quickly and manage typically receive higher incentive fees for higher
cash flow. The bank knows the fund manager IRRs, so a manager could use the investor’s
can always call capital from investors to pay balance sheet to obtain cheap capital in order to
down the line, which is why they are willing to make more fees.
E X A M P L E D : T W O $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 I N V E S T M E N T S R E S U LT I N G I N D I F F E R E N T I R R S
SCENARIO #2
SCENARIO #1
1 . H OW H AV E YO U R PA S T D E A L S
PERFORMED?
2 . HOW M UCH OF YOU R OWN MON E Y to do so is by making sure that the team is
ARE YOU INVES TING? compensated based on performance and not
on transactions. Also, investors should make
Alignment is everything. The manager should sure that the team that is in place today is the
be investing a significant amount of his or her same one that was responsible for delivering the
own capital (capital not funded by others) right manager’s historical returns.
along with the investors. And the bulk of his or her
earnings should come from investment returns —
9. H OW I S YO U R CO M PA N Y F U N D E D ?
R E A L E S TAT E T R A N S AC T I O N F E E S
Debt Placement Fee: This is a fee that is often paid to an outside broker, which is standard industry practice for lining up
debt. The typical fee between .25% and .75% of total debt, depending on deal size. A good broker can save a project a lot
more than the cost of this fee. However, some managers try to layer on their own internal fee on top of a debt placement
fee to the tune of between .25% and .75%. This is very impactful to equity, as the amount of debt used in a typical
transaction is two times larger than the amount of equity.
Refinancing Fee: This is similar to a debt placement fee and some managers charge between .25% and 1% for this service.
Wholesale Marketing Fee: This fee is typically paid to the broker dealer by non-traded REITs for product distribution and
equates to roughly 3% on equity.
Advisor/Syndication Fee: Some real estate companies such as private REIT’s use broker-dealers to distribute their
products through an advisory network. These advisors are typically paid an upfront, one-time fee of between 4% and 7%.
Some sponsors will charge a smaller upfront fee but add acquisition or transaction charges. Often these commissions are
hidden in the fine print that itemizes capital spending.
Joint Venture Fees: By themselves, joint ventures don’t add another layer of fees, but the investor is then paying two
managers instead of one. If the investment manager is simply providing access, then those fees should be much lower
than a manager who adds value to the joint venture by executing the business plan.
Selling Fees: It’s always good practice to take a project to market to generate the highest value. Typically, brokers are
paid between 1% and 3% of sales price, depending on project size. Some managers charge their own internal fee between
.25% and .75% on top of that.
wp20180803