Sunteți pe pagina 1din 37

SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD

REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION Date


Project SECTION OF NH-96 FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH:
Document No. ALLA-01
No. 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON
ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS CONTRACT. 20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

1 Design of Main Longitudinal Girder


1.1.1 Input Data
Bridge Geometry
Effective span for Main Girder = 18.000 m IRC 24-2010 clause 504.1-Page 36
Spacing of main Girder = 2.85 m
>1/20th of Span OK IRC 24-2010 clause 504.3-Page 36
Wearing Coat Thickness = 65 mm For design 100mm considered
Effective span for Cross Girder = 2.50 m IRC 24-2010 clause 504.1-Page 36
Number of main girders = 10 No's
Number of intermediate diaphragms = 6 No's
Number of End diaphragms = 2 No's

Depth of Slab = 250 mm


Depth of Haunch above girder = 100 mm
Width of Haunch above girder = 100 mm
Offset from flange face = 50 mm

Sectional Property of Steel Section


Overall Depth Of Section h = 1,067 mm
> 720 mm IRC 24-2010 clause 504.4-Page 36
Thickness of Top Flange ttop_f = 22 mm
Thickness of Bottom Flange tbot_f = 45 mm
Thickness of Web tw = 14 mm
Clear Depth of Web between flanges d = 1,000 mm
Width of Top Flange btop = 400 mm
Width of Bottom Flange bbot = 800 mm

1.1.2 Sectional Properties Used for Analysis of Structure


Area IYY IZZ
m2 m4 m4
I-Girder 0.0588 0.00204 0.0098

Long Term 0.110 0.00213 0.0346


Inner
0.162
Girder Short Term 0.00278 0.0440

Outer Long Term 0.121 0.00220 0.0371


Girder Short Term 0.183 0.00333 0.0463

Intermediate Cross Girder 0.0196 0.00004 0.0028


End Cross Girder 0.0738 0.00052 0.0398
1.1.3 Characteristic Stresses and Material Constants
Structural Steel Grade = E250
Type - IS 800-2007 Table I Page 14/
Max Tensile stress = 250 MPa IS2062 Table 2 Page 4

Yield stress of steel used for girders = 240 MPa


Yield strength of steel used for Shear Connector = 240 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity for Steel E = 200000 MPa
Unit Mass of Steel ρ = 7,850 kg/m3
Poisson's Ratio μ = 0.3 IRC 24-2010 Page 24
Modulus of Rigidity G = 7.7E+04 MPa
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion αt = 1.20E-05 /oC

Concrete grade for deck slab = M35 MPa


Steel Reinforcement grade = Fe500 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ec = 32,000 MPa IRC 22-2015 Cl. III.1 Page 85
Density of Concrete = 25 kN/m3

Creep Factor for long term loads Kc = 0.5 IRC 22-2015 Cl. 604.3-Page 23

Permissible Stresses in Structural Steel


Permissible elastic stress in structural steel 0.87*fytk = 209 MPa

Permissible Stresses in Concrete


Permissible bending stress in concrete 0.48*fck = 16.80 MPa IRC 22-2015 Cl 604.3.1 Pg 23

1.1.4 Impact Factor As per IRC:6 -2014 Clause 208.3 Page 25


1) Impact factor for steel girder with Class A loading = 9 / (13.5 +L)
Impact percentage for 18.00 m span =9/(13.5+18.000) = 28.6%
= 129%
2.85 m span =9/(13.5+2.85) = 55.0%
= 155%

2) Impact percentage for steel girders with 70R wheeled Vehicles = 25.0% up to 23 m span
= 15.4% beyond 45 m span
Impact percentage for 18.0 m span Interpolate the above value for given span
=25.0%-(18.000-23)/(45-23)×(25.0%-15.4%) = 27.2%
= 127%
3) Impact percentage for steel girders with 70R Tracked Vehicles = 10.0%
= 110% All Span
1.1.5 Summary of Staad Output For Main Girders (BM at Mid Span and Shear Force at Support)
Very Negligible Torsion is acting on Girder hence neglected

G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
(Outer) (Inner) (Middle) (Outer (Inner) (Middle)
Sr. No. Description
Max. Bending Moment
Max. Shear Force (kN)
(kN)
1 Self Weight MODIFIED 635 635 635 195 195 195
2 Railing (SIDL)
3 SIDL - Crash Barrier & Railing 215 215 215 85 85 85
4 SIDL - Wearing Coat 160 160 160 50 50 50
5 Comb. of 70R and Class A 1000 1000 1000 320 320 320
6 Class A - 3 Lane 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 70R Tracked Eccentric 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Footpath Live Load MODIFIED 0 10 10 5 5 5
1.1.6 Summary of Forces for Evaluating Structural Strength at Ultimate Limit State
As per Annex B of IRC:6-2010 clause 4.2 for checking the structural strength, the partial safety factor for loads shown in column
No. 2 under Table 3.2 are adopted.
Basic Combination
G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
Partial
(Outer) (Inner) (Middle) (Outer (Inner) (Middle)
Sr. No. Description Safety
Max. Bending Moment
factor Max. Shear Force (kN)
(kN-m)
1 Self Weight 1.35 857 857 857 263 263 263
2 Railing (SIDL) 1.35 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 SIDL - Crash Barrier & Railing 1.35 290 290 290.25 115 115 115
4 SIDL - Wearing Coat 1.75 280 280 280.00 88 88 88
5 Comb. of 70R and Class A 1.5 1929 1929 1929 617 617 617
6 Class A - 3 Lane 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 70R Tracked Eccentric 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Footpath Live Load 1.5 0 15 15 8 8 8
Combination -1 3356 3356 3356 1083 1083 1083
Maximum Live Load 1929 1929 1929 617 617 617

1.1.7 Summary of Forces for Serviceability Limit State


Rare Combination for Stress Check
G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
Impact (Outer) (Inner) (Middle) (Outer (Inner) (Middle)
Sr. No. Description
Factor Max. Bending Moment
Max. Shear Force (kN)
(kN-m)
1 Self Weight 100% 635 635 635 195 195 195
2 Railing (SIDL) 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 SIDL - Crash Barrier & Railing 100% 215 215 215 85 85 85
4 SIDL - Wearing Coat 100% 160 160 160 50 50 50
5 Comb. of 70R and Class A 129% 1286 1286 1286 411 411 411
6 Class A - 3 Lane 129% 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 70R Tracked Eccentric 110% 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Footpath Live Load 100% 0 10 10 5 5 5
Combination - 2 2296 2296 2296 741 741 741
Maximum Live load 1286 1286 1286 411 411 411

1.1.8 Quasi-permanent Combination for Shrinkage and Creep


G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
Partial (Outer) (Inner) (Middle) (Outer (Inner) (Middle)
Sr. No. Description Safety
Max. Bending Moment
factor Max. Shear Force (kN)
(kN-m)
1 Self Weight 1 635 635 635 195 195 195
2 Railing (SIDL) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 SIDL - Crash Barrier & Railing 1 215 215 215 85 85 85
4 SIDL - Wearing Coat 1 160 160 160 50 50 50
Combination - 2 1010 1010 1010 330 330 330
1.1.9 Summary of Staad Output For Splice Design (At 4m from Support)
Maximum moment in Girder at Splice loacations is calculated and governing from either side is represented below.
G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
(Outer) (Inner) (Middle) (Outer (Inner) (Middle)
Sr. No. Description
Bending Moment in
Shear Force (kN)
(kN-m)
1 Self Weight 635 635 635 195 195 195
2 Railing (SIDL)
3 SIDL - Crash Barrier & Railing 215 215 215 85 85 85
4 SIDL - Wearing Coat 160 160 160 50 50 50
5 Comb. of 70R and Class A 1000 1000 1000 320 320 320
6 Class A - 3 Lane
7 70R Tracked Eccentric
8 Footpath Live Load

1.1.10 Summary of Forces for Splice Plate Design( Ultimate Limit State )
G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3
Partial (Outer) (Inner) (Middle) (Outer (Inner) (Middle)
Sr. No. Description Safety
Bending Moment in
factor Shear Force kN
kN-m
1 Self Weight 1.35 857 857 857 263 263 263
2 Railing (SIDL) 1.35 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 SIDL - Crash Barrier & Railing 1.35 290 290 290 115 115 115
4 SIDL - Wearing Coat 1.75 280 280 280 88 88 88
5 Comb. of 70R and Class A 1.5 1929 1929 1929 617 617 617
6 Class A - 3 Lane 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 70R Tracked Eccentric 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Footpath Live Load 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0
COMB 1 3356 3356 3356 1083 1083 1083
COMB 2 Live Load Only 1929 1929 1929 617 617 617
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION
Date
Project SECTION OF NH-96 FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO
Document No. ALLA-01
No. FOUR LANE WITH PAVED SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING,
PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

2 Construction Stage check


2.1 OUTER GIRDER
2.1.1 1. 1ST Stage Analysis "+" denotes comp. stress
Moment due to self weight = 205 KN-m "-" denotes tensile stress
Moment due to Deck Slab = 430 KN-m
Moment due to Const. Load = 577 KN-m
Total = 1212.125 KN-m
Stress at top of Steel Girder = 94.53 Mpa
Stress at bottom of Steel Girder = -37.24 Mpa

2.1.2 2. 2ND Stage Analysis


Moment due to C/B = 215 KN-m
Moment due to Wearing Coat = 160 KN-m
Total = 407 KN-m
Stress at top of Steel Girder = 3.1 Mpa
Stress at bottom of Steel Girder = -8.6 Mpa
Stress at top of Deck Slab = 0.46 Mpa
Stress at bottom of Deck Slab = 0.21 Mpa

2.1.3 Cumulative Stress:


Stress at top of Steel Girder = 97.63 Mpa
Stress at bottom of Steel Girder = -45.84 Mpa

2.2 INNER GIRDER


2.2.1 1. 1ST Stage Analysis
Moment due to self weight = 205 KN-m
Moment due to Deck Slab = 430 KN-m
Moment due to Const. Load = 577 KN-m
Total = 1212.125 KN-m
Stress at top of Steel Girder = 94.53 Mpa
Stress at bottom of Steel Girder = -37.24 Mpa

2.2.2 2. 2ND Stage Analysis


Moment due to C/B = 215 KN-m
Moment due to Wearing Coat = 160 KN-m
Total = 407 KN-m
Stress at top of Steel Girder = 3.84 Mpa
Stress at bottom of Steel Girder = -8.71 Mpa
Stress at top of Deck Slab = 0.53 Mpa
Stress at bottom of Deck Slab = 0.26 Mpa

2.2.3 Cumulative Stress:


Stress at top of Steel Girder = 98.4 Mpa
Stress at bottom of Steel Girder = -46.0 Mpa
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-
Date
Project 96 FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC)
20-Aug-19
BASIS CONTRACT.

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

3 Shrinkage Calculations
3.1 OUTER GIRDER

Thickness of Deck slab = 0.25 m


Grade of Concrete of Deck Slab = 35 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel = 200000 Mpa
Shrinkage Co-efficient = 0.0002 IRC 6-2010 clause 217.3
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Long Term) Kc.Ec = 16000 Mpa IRC 22-2015 clause 604.3-Page 23

3.225
0.400

0.250 -0.13 -8.21E-06


0.022 -0.77 30.43 1.52E-04
-4.79E-05

1.067 0.014

Ycg

0.045 -3.42 -1.71E-05


0.800 Stress Diagram Strain Diagram
Modular Ratio, m (long-term) Es/(Kc.Ec) = 12.50

SL.No. A y Ay Ay2 Io Io + Ay2

1. Deck Slab 0.06450 1.19200 0.07688 0.09165 0.000336 0.09198


2. Rctangular top Flange 0.00880 1.05600 0.00929 0.00981 0.00000 0.00981
4. Web 0.01400 0.54500 0.00763 0.00416 0.001167 0.00533
6. Rect. Bottom Flange 0.03600 0.02250 0.00081 0.00002 0.00001 0.00002

Composite Section S 0.12330 0.09462 0.1056 0.002 0.10714


Girder Only S 0.05880 0.01773 0.0140 0.001 0.01516
SA SAy SAy2 S Io S(Io + Ay2)

Section Properties of Composite Section


2
Area SA = 0.1233 m
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y =S(A.y) / SA = 0.7674 m
4
Moment of inertia of Composite Girder (Iz) = S(Io+A.y2)-SA.Y2 = 0.0345 m

Axial Force due to Shrinkage = 2580.00 KN


Eccentricity of Force = 0.425 m
Moment about cg of Composite Girder due to Shrinkage Force = 1095.54 KN-m

Stress Summary due to Shrinkage (Mpa) for Simply Supported Girder


Assuming End Due to release of
Due to release of Axial Force Total Stress (Mpa)
Restrained Moment

1. Top of Deck Slab = -3.20 1.67 1.39 -0.13

2. Bottom of Deck Slab = -3.20 1.67 0.76 -0.77

3. Top of Steel Girder = 20.92 9.50 30.43

4. Bottom of Steel Girder = 20.92 -24.34 -3.42


3.1 INNER GIRDER

Thickness of Deck slab = 0.25 m


Grade of Concrete of Deck Slab = 35 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel = 200000 Mpa
Shrinkage Co-efficient = 0.0002 IRC 6-2010 clause 217.3
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Long Term) = 16000 Mpa IRC 22-2015 clause 604.3-Page 23

2.850
0.400

0.250 -0.19 -1.2E-05


0.022 -0.81 29.89 1.49E-04
-5.06E-05

1.067 0.014

Ycg

0.045 -3.38 -1.69E-05


0.800 Stress Diagram Strain Diagram
Modular of Ratio, m (long-term) Es/(Kc.Ec) = 12.50

2 2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay

1. Deck Slab 0.05700 1.19200 0.06794 0.08099 0.000297 0.08129


2. Rctangular top Flange 0.00880 1.05600 0.00929 0.00981 0.00000 0.00981
4. Web 0.01400 0.54500 0.00763 0.00416 0.001167 0.00533
6. Rect. Bottom Flange 0.03600 0.02250 0.00081 0.00002 0.00001 0.00002

Composite Section S 0.11580 0.08568 0.0950 0.001 0.09645


Girder Only S 0.05880 0.01773 0.0140 0.001 0.01516
SA SAy SAy2 S Io S(Io + Ay2)

Section Properties of Composite Section


2
Area SA = 0.1158 m
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y =S(A.y) / SA = 0.7399 m
4
Moment of inertia of Composite Girder (Iz) = S(Io+A.y2)-SA.Y2 = 0.0331 m

Axial Force due to Shrinkage = 2280.00 KN


Eccentricity of Force = 0.452 m
Moment about cg of Composite Girder due to Shrinkage Force = 1030.86 KN-m

Stress Summary due to Shrinkage (Mpa) for Simply Supported Girder


Assuming End Due to release of
Due to release of Axial Force Total Stress (Mpa)
Restrained Moment

1. Top of Deck Slab = -3.20 1.58 1.44 -0.19

2. Bottom of Deck Slab = -3.20 1.58 0.82 -0.81

3. Top of Steel Girder = 19.69 10.20 29.89

4. Bottom of Steel Girder = 19.69 -23.07 -3.38


SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
20-Aug-19
CONTRACT.

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

4 Differential Temperature Calculations


4.1 OUTER GIRDER
Short Term Properties
Total Height of the Steel Girder h = 1.417 m
C.G. of Girder from bottom Yb = 0.939 m
4
M.O.I. of the Section I = 0.0463 m
2
Area of the Section A = 0.1827 m
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es = 2.00E+05 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ec = 32000 Mpa
o
Coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete α = 1.20E-05 C
Modular Ratio (Short Term) m = 7.500
Section Modulus at the top of Slab ZTS = 0.097 m3
Section Modulus at the top of Girder ZTG = 0.204 m3
Section Modulus at the bottom of Girder ZBG = 0.049 m
3

(Refer Fig. 10(b) of IRC:6 - 2014) h (m) T1 (0C)


T1 = 19.25 o
C h1 = 0.15 m 0.2 18
T2 = 4.0 o
C h2 = 0.4 m 0.3 20.5
T3 = 3 o
C (temp at slab bottom)
T4 = 2.78 o
C (temp at steel girder top flange bottom)
COMPUTATION OF STRESSES DUE TO RISE IN TEMPERATURE

19.25 Stress 3.225

1 0.15 46.20 0.400

2 9.60 0.250
3 0.4 7.20 0.022
4 6.67
0.00
1.067 0.014
0.867

3 0 0.045
3 0.800

Section of Girder

STRESSES AT SECTION

Stresses
Assumin Stress due Stress
y g End to release due to
Height Stress b Force e Moment Final Stress
Segment from top Restrain of Axial release of
ed Force Moment
mm Mpa mm KN mm mm KNm Mpa Mpa Mpa Mpa
1 150 46.20 430.00 1799.55 58.60 419.03 754.07 46.20 -12.23 -8.96 3.33
2 100 9.60 430.00 361.20 197.62 280.02 101.14 9.60
3 22 7.20 400.00 61.04 260.86 216.78 13.23 7.20 -12.23 -4.27 -1.24
4 278 6.67 14.00 12.98 364.67 112.97 1.47 6.67 -12.23 -4.27 -9.83
0.00 -12.23 17.63 5.40
2234.77 869.91

COMPUTATION OF STRESSES DUE TO FALL IN TEMPERATURE h (m) T1 (0C)


0.2 4.4
5.60 h = 1.417 m 0.3 6.8
1 0.15
2 0.0 0.100 0.02 h1 = 0.150 m T1 = 5.6 o
C
3 0.44 0.38 h2 = 0.100 m T2 = 0 o
C
8.00 h3 = 0.022 m T3 = 0 o
C
h4 = 0.378 m T4 = 0.44 o
C
4 0.622 h5 = 0.622 m T5 = 8.00 o
C
h6 = 0.045 m

5 8.00 0.045
0.4

STRESSES AT SECTION
Stresses
Assumin Stress due Stress
y g End to release due to
Height Stress b Force e Moment Final Stress
Segment from top Restrain of Axial release of
ed Force Moment
mm Mpa mm KN mm mm KNm Mpa Mpa Mpa Mpa
1 150.00 -13.44 430.00 -433.44 50.00 427.64 -185.35 -13.44 7.39 4.75 -0.17
100.00 0.00 430.00 0.00 7.39 2.27 1.29
2 22.00 -1.06 400.00 -4.65 257.33 220.30 -1.02 0.00 7.39 2.27 9.65
3 378.00 -19.20 14.00 -53.60 517.43 -39.79 2.13 -19.20 7.39
4 622.00 -19.20 14.00 -167.19 961.00 -483.36 80.82 -19.20 7.39
5 45.00 -19.20 800.00 -691.20 1294.50 -816.86 564.62 -19.20 7.39 -9.35 -21.16
-1350.08 461.19
4.2 INNER GIRDER
Short Term Properties
Total Height of the Steel Girder h = 1.417 m
C.G. of Girder from bottom Yb = 0.900 m
4
M.O.I. of the Section I = 0.0440 m
Area of the Section A = 0.1618 m2
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es = 2.00E+05 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ec = 32,000 Mpa
o
Coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete α = 1.20E-05 C
Modular Ratio (Short Term) m = 7.500
Section Modulus at the top of Slab ZTS = 0.085 m
3

Section Modulus at the top of Girder ZTG = 0.165 m3


Section Modulus at the bottom of Girder ZBG = 0.049 m
3

(Refer Fig. 10(b) of IRC:6 - 2014) h (m) T1 (0C)


T1 = 19.25 o
C h1 = 0.1500 m 0.2 18
T2 = 4.0 o
C h2 = 0.4 m 0.3 20.5
T3 = 3 o
C (temp at slab bottom)
T4 = 2.78 o
C (temp at steel girder top flange bottom)
COMPUTATION OF STRESSES DUE TO RISE IN TEMPERATURE

19.25 Stress 2.850

1 0.1500 46.20 0.400

2 9.60 0.250
3 0.4 7.20 0.022
4 6.67
0.00
1.067 0.014
0.867

3 0 0.045
3 0.800

Section of Girder

STRESSES AT SECTION

Stresses
y Assumin Stress due Stress
Height Stress b Force e Moment Final Stress
Segment from top g End to release due to
mm Mpa mm KN mm mm KNm Mpa Mpa Mpa Mpa
1 150 46.20 380.00 1590.30 58.60 419.03 666.39 46.20 -12.23 -10.22 3.17
2 100 9.60 380.00 319.20 197.62 280.02 89.38 9.60
3 22 7.20 400.00 61.04 260.86 216.78 13.23 7.20 -12.23 -5.28 -1.37
4 278 6.67 14.00 12.98 364.67 112.97 1.47 6.67 -12.23 -5.28 -10.84
0.00 -12.23 17.81 5.58
1983.52 770.47

COMPUTATION OF STRESSES DUE TO FALL IN TEMPERATURE h (m) T1 (0C)


0.2 4.4
5.60 h = 1.417 m 0.3 6.8
1 0.15
2 0.0 0.100 0.02 h1 = 0.150 m T1 = 5.6 o
C
3 0.44 0.38 h2 = 0.100 m T2 = 0 o
C
8.00 h3 = 0.022 m T3 = 0 o
C
h4 = 0.378 m T4 = 0.44 o
C
4 0.622 h5 = 0.622 m T5 = 8.00 o
C
h6 = 0.045 m

5 8.00 0.045
0.4

STRESSES AT SECTION
Stresses
y Assumin Stress due Stress
Height Stress b Force e Moment Final Stress
Segment from top g End to release due to
mm Mpa mm KN mm mm KNm Mpa Mpa Mpa Mpa
1 150.00 -13.44 380.00 -383.04 50.00 427.64 -163.80 -13.44 7.39 5.42 -0.08
100.00 0.00 380.00 0.00 7.39 2.80 1.36
2 22.00 -1.06 400.00 -4.65 257.33 220.30 -1.02 0.00 7.39 2.80 10.19
3 378.00 -19.20 14.00 -53.60 517.43 -39.79 2.13 -19.20 7.39
4 622.00 -19.20 14.00 -167.19 961.00 -483.36 80.82 -19.20 7.39
5 45.00 -19.20 800.00 -691.20 1294.50 -816.86 564.62 -19.20 7.39 -9.44 -21.25
-1299.68 482.74
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.1 Design of Steel Girder


5.1.1 SECTIONAL PROPERTIES
5.1.1.1 Elastic Sectional Property

400
22

Weight of One Girder=83.1 kN


765
Total Wt. of Girder= 831 kN
14
1,000 1,067

302

45

800
Figure 3.1 Cross section of Steel Girder

y = C. G. of individual plate from bottom of girder


Yb = N. A. of section from bottom of girder
Izz = Moment of Inertial about y - y
Iyy = Moment of Inertial about z - z

Yb ∑ "I" Self @ "I" self @ Izz = Iself +


B D Area (A) y Ay A(Yb - y)2
Description (A x y) / ∑ A x- x y- y A(Yb-y)2

cm cm cm2 cm cm3 cm cm4 cm4 cm4


Top flange 40.00 2.20 88.0 105.60 9,293 30.16 500854 35.49 11733 500,889
Web 1.40 100.00 140.0 54.50 7,630 30.16 82956 116667 23 199,622
Bottom flange 80.00 4.50 360.0 2.25 810 30.16 280385 608 192000 280,992
588 17,733 864195 203756 981,504

As section is unsymmetrical about z-z axis, the moment of inertial is calculated based on parallel axis theorem
4
Izz = 981,504 cm
and symmetric about y - y axis, hence the addition of Iself about y-y axis itself as a Iyy of section
Iyy = 203756.2 cm4

Elastic Section Modulus of section (Ze)


3
Z top =981,504/(765/10) = 12,823 cm
3
Z bot =981,504/30.16 = 32,546 cm
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.1.1.2 Plastic Section Modulus of section (Zp)


IRC:22-2015 Cl. 603.1.3 Pg. 12
ε =SQRT(250/240) = 1.02 MPa
20 ε tw =20xSQRT(250/240)x14 = 285.77

3
Zp = 23078.082 cm

5.1.2 Sectional Requirement for Steel Girder


fy= Yield Stress of Steel Used = 240 MPa
ε =SQRT(250/240) = 1.02
Minimum width to thickness ratio for Compression Flange IRC 24-2010 clause 503.7.2 Table 2 -Page 33
Compression
Ratio Class 1 Plastic Class 2 Compact Class 3 Semi compact
Element
8.4ε = 8.57 9.4ε = 9.59 13.6ε = 13.88
Outstand element of
b/tf Actual = 8.77 Actual = 8.77 Actual = 8.77
compression flange
NOT OK OK OK

Minimum depth to thickness ratio for Web IRC 24-2010 clause 503.7.2 Table 2 -Page 33
Compression
Ratio Class 1 Plastic Class 2 Compact Class 3 Semi compact
Element
84ε = 85.73 105ε = 107.17 126ε = 128.60
Web of an I-
d/tw Actual = 71.43 Actual = 71.43 Actual = 71.43
section
OK OK OK
Overall Section is "Semi Compact"
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Minimum Web thickness IRC 24-2010 clause 509.6.1-Page 97


The thickness of web in a section shall satisfy the following requirement
1) Serviceability requirement
2) Compression flange buckling requirement

1 Serviceability requirement IRC 24-2010 clause 509.6.1.1 -Page 97


a) When Transverse Stiffeners are not provided
ϵ = SQRT(250/fyw) = 1.021
d/tw <= 200ε
71.43 <= 204.1241 N/A

b) When only Transverse Stiffeners are provided


Spacing of transverse stiffeners c = 2900 mm
Depth of web d = 1000 mm

i) When 3d >= c >= d 3000.0 >= 2900 >= 1000 OK


ii) When 0.74d <= c < d 740.00 <= 2900 >= 1000 N/A
iii) When c < 0.74d 2900 >= 740 N/A
iv) When c > 3d 2900 < 3000 Stiffened

Considering Case i) d/tw <= 200ε


71 <= 204 OK
As web thickness satisfies serviceability requirement, there is no need to provide transverse stiffeners.

IRC 24-2010 clause 509.6.1.2 -Page 99


b) When Transverse Stiffeners are provided
i) When c >= 1.5 d 2900 >= 1500 d/tw<=345 ϵf2 71.43 <= 359.38 OK
ii) When c < 1.5d 2900 >= 1500 d/tw<=345 ϵf 71.43 <= 352.11 N/A

* Design for Construction Stage *


5.1.3 Design Shear Strength of Steel Girder (Vd) IRC 24-2010 clause 509.4-Page 90
Vd = Vn/ϒmo
Where,
Vd = Design Strength
Vn = Nominal shear resistance of the section
ϒmo = Partial safety factor against shear failure = 1.10 IRC 24-2010 clause 503.4-Page 30

The vertical shear force is assumed to be resisted by the web of the steel section.
Nominal Shear strength may be governed by plastic shear resistance or strength of web as governed by shear buckling.

1) Plastic Shear Resistance:


Vn = Vp
Where, Vp = Av x fyw / √3
AV = Shear Area IRC 24-2010 clause 509.4.1.1-Page 91
= d x tw (Considering Major Axis Bending for Welded Sections)
2
= 14000 mm
fyw = Yield strength of the web

Hence, Vp = 1939896.9 N
= 1940 kN

2) Shear Buckling Resistance:


Resistance to shear buckling shall be verified I the following manner:

2) For stiffened webs d/tw > 67 ϵ √(Kv / 5.35)


71.43 > 71.36 OK

Where, Kv = Shear Buckling Coefficient IRC 24-2010 clause 509.4.2.2-Page 92


= 5.826 when transverse stiffeners are provided with c/d >= 1
ϵ = √ (250 / fy)
The resistance to shear buckling is calculated by the following methods.
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

a) Simple Post Critical method


Vn = Vcr
Where,
Vcr = Shear force corresponding to web buckling
= Av x τb
τb = Shear stress corresponding to web buckling

τcr,e = kv π2 E / (12 (1 - μ2 )(d / tw )2)

= 206.40 MPa
IRC 24-2010 clause 509.4.2.2 (a)-Page 92
λw = √(fyw / (√(3 τcr,e)) Or Eq. 3.9 of IRC 22: 2010, Page 20

= 0.82

The shear stress corresponding to web buckling is calculated as follows:


When λw <= 0.8 τb = fyw / √3
When 0.8 < λw < 1.2 τb = (( 1 - 0.8 ) ( λw - 0.8 )) ( fyw / √3 )
When λw >= 1.2 τb = fyw /( √3 λw2)

Hence τb = 136.42 MPa

Hence Vcr = Av x τb
Vcr = 1909858 N
Vn = 1910 kN

b) Tension field method Tension field method is applicable

Vn = Vtf
Vtf = [ Av x τb + 0.9 wtf twfv sinφ] <= Vp IRC 24-2010 clause 509.4.2.2 (b)-Page 93
= 1944 kN OK

τb = Shear stress corresponding to web buckling


= 136.42 MPa
fv = Yield Strength of the tension field
= [fyw2 - 3 τb2 + ᵠ2]0.5 - ᵠ
7 MPa
ᵠ = 1.5 τb sin2φ
126 MPa
ᵠ = Inclination of the tension field = tan-1(d/c)
19
wtf = Width of the tension filed
= d cosφ − (c - sc - st ) sin φ
380 mm
fyw = Yield stress of the Web
d = Depth of the Web
c = Spacing of the Stiffeners in the Web
τb = Shear stress corresponding to buckling of Web ( Cl. 509.4.2.2(a))
sc, st = Anchorage length of tension field along the comp. and tension flange respectively, obtained from:
s = 2/sinφ [Mfr/fywtw]0.5<=c
= 583
Mfr = .25bftf2fyf [1-{Nf/(bftffyf/γmo)}2]
= 97200000
bf,tf = Width and thickness of the relevant flange respectively
fyf = Yield stress pf the flange

Nf = 328 kN
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Nominal Shear strength is minimum of the above two methods.


Vn = 1910 kN

Design shear strength is obtained by dividing the nominal shear strength by the factor of safety.
Vd = 1,910/1.10
= 1736 kN

Shear Force Due to DL during Construction = 378 kN


Shear force due to Construction LL = 128 kN
Maximum shear force in the critical girder at construction stage = 506 kN < 1736 kN
(considering wt of steel girder & green concrete slab alone)
OK

5.1.4 Design Bending Strength for Steel section

The moment capacity of a simply supported beam will vary depending upon conditions of lateral supports. To be defined as laterally supported,
any one of the following conditions need to be satisfied.
IRC 24-2010 clause 509.2.2 , Pg 80
1) Bending is about minor axis of section
2) Section is hollow (rectangular/tubular) of solid
3) In case of major axis bending, λLT < 0.4

As the first two conditions are not applicable the third condition needs to be checked before the bending strength is determined.
fy
λLT =
f cr ,b
Where,
λLT = A non-dimensionless slenderness ratio
fy = Yield stress of steel section
fcr,b = Extreme fibre bending compressive stress corresponding to lateral elastic buckling moment

As per clause 509.2.2.1 of IRC 24 (2010), the elastic lateral torsional buckling moment,

Mcr = βb Zp fcr,b
i.e. fcr,b = Mcr /βb Zp
Where,
βb = 1 (for plastic and compact sections)
= Z e / Zp (for semi compact sections) = 0.556
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Calculation of Elastic Critical Moment

1) For Laterally Un-Supported Beam


The design bending strength of the steel girder is calculated as follows, when Vn < 0.6Vd.
IRC 24-2010 clause 509.2.2-Page 80
Md = βb Z p f bd

Where,
f bd = χLT f y / γmo
χLT = 1/(φLT + (φLT2 - λLT2)1/2) <1.0
φLT = 0.5*[1 + αLT(λLT - 0.2) + λLT2]
αLT = 0.49
λLT = slenderness ratio = (βb Zp fy / Mcr)1/2 < (1.2 Ze fy / Mcr)1/2
βb = 1.000

π 2 EI y  K  I w 
0.5
Mcr
2
GI ( L ) 2   Annex-C of IRC-24-2010, pg.177
= c1   + t 2 LT + (c 2 y g − c3 y j ) 2  − (c 2 y g − c3 y j )
(This applies only to non-symmetric cross sections)
2
( LLT )  K w  I y

π EI y 
 
 
E = Modulus of elasticity of material = 200000 MPa
LLT = eff. length for lateral torsion restraint = 21600 mm
(1.2 times the length of relevant segment in between partial lateral restraints, i.e. length between intermediate girders)
Iy = Moment of inertia @ weak axis = 2037562000 mm4
G = Modulus of rigidity = 77000 MPa IRC 24-2010 clause 502.2.2-Page 24
It = St. Venant's Torsion constant
= Σbt (ti)3 /3 = 2.66E+07 mm4
I fc = MI of Comp. flange @ minor axis = 1.2E+08 mm4
I ft = MI of Ten. flange @ minor axis = 1.9E+09 mm4
βf = I fc / (I fc + I ft ) = 0.06
hy = 1033.5
Iw = Warping Constant
= (1- β f ) β f I y h y 2 = 1.18E+14 mm4
K = 1
The value of K depends on end restraints
0.50 For complete restraint against rotation about weak axis
1.00 For no restraint against rotation about weak axis
0.70 For partial restraint against rotation about minor axis
Kw = 1
The value of Kw is generally taken as 1 unless special arrangements have been made to restrain warping at end supports of sections
yg = Distance between point of application of load and shear centre of cross section. Its positive when load acts
towards shear centre
= (hy /( (1 +(btop + bbot)3 x (ttop_f / tbot_f) )) - ytop (Ref: "Design of Steel Structures" by Dr N. Subramaniam, Pg 849)
(Applicable only for monosymmetric I sections)
= 985 mm
yj = -457.23
c1 = 1.132
c2 = 0.459 (Annex-C of IRC-24-2010, Table-C.1)
c3 = 0.525

∴ Mcr = 1.84E+09 Nmm


∴ λLT = 1.418 Beam is laterally unsupported Md1 applicable
∴ φLT = 1.80
∴ χLT = 0.34
fbd = χLTfy/ϒm0
= 75 MPa
M d1 = 1,725 kN-m .
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Construction live load considering 1.5 kN/m2 & 3.5 kN/m2 for = 14.25 kN/m
form work and live loads respectively.
Moment at centre for simply supported girder with = 577 kNm
construction live load
Maximum BM in the critical girder at construction stage = 469 kNm This moment is unfactored
(considering wt of steel girder & concrete slab alone)

Bending Moment Check = 1,046 kN-m < 1725 kN-m


OK

2) For Laterally Supported Beam


The design bending strength of the steel girder is calculated as follows, when Vn < 0.6Vd.

Md = βb x Zp x fy / ϒmo <1.2 x Ze x fy / ϒmo (Simply Supported Beam)


Where, IRC 24-2010 clause 509.2.1.2 , Pg 79
βb = 1.0 for plastic and coMPact sections
βb = Ze / Zp for semi coMPact section
Ze, Zp = Plastic and elastic section modulus of the cross section, respectively
∴ βb = 1.000
fy = Yield stress of the material
ϒmo = Partial safety factor = 1.1 IRC 24-2010 clause 503.4-Page 30

Vn = Factored design Shear Force = 506 kN


Vd = Design Shear Strength of the cross section 1,736 kN
The design bending strength of the steel girder is calculated as follows, when 506.25 < 1041.7
Vn < 0.6Vd
Md = βb x Zp x fy / ϒmo
Where,
βb = 1.0 for plastic and compact sections
βb = Ze / Zp for semi coMPact section = 1.000 Bb
Ze, Zp = Plastic and elastic section modulus of the cross section, respectively
fy = Yield stress of the material
ϒmo = Partial safety factor for yielding = 1.1

Hence Md2 = 5035 kNm

Maximum BM in the critical girder at construction stage = 1212 kNm < 5035 kNm
OK
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

*Design for Service Stage *


5.2 Design of Composite Section at Ultimate Limit State
5.2.1 Effective Width for composite Section IRC 22-2015 clause 603.2-Page 15

0.5 0.5

11.0

1.80 G5 2.85 G4 2.85 G3 2.85 G2 2.85 G1 1.80


30.000

Figure 3.2 Cross section of Bridge

Effective width beff of deck slab for Inner girder Effective width beff of deck slab for Outer girder
beff = L0 / 4 <= (B1 + B2)/2 beff = (L0 / 8 <= B/2) + ( X <= L/8)
= 4.50 > 2.85 = 1.43 + 1.80
beff = 2.85 m beff = 3.23 m

5.2.2 Composite section (Inner Girder)


Grade of Concrete for Slab fck = 35 MPa
Grade of R/F steel for Slab fy = 500 MPa
E for concrete Ec ( s ) = 31,000 MPa
E for steel Es = 200,000 MPa

2,850

250 500
100 400
22
100
50

765

1,417 14
1,000 1,067

302

45

800
Figure 3.3 Cross section of Inner Composite Section
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.2.3 Moment of resistance of Composite Section (Inner Girder)


Bending Moment with full shear Interaction IRC:22 -2015, Clause 603.5.1-Annexure I, Page 70
Notation Af = Area of top flange of steel beam of a composite section = 8,800 mm2
As = Cross section area of steel beam of a composite section = 58,032 mm2
(Considering effective web area for plastic section,Refer 5.2.1.2)
beff = Effective width of concrete slab (Considering constant slab depth over steel girder) = 2,207 mm
bf = Width of top flange of steel section = 400 mm
ds = Overall depth of concrete slab = 350 mm
dc = Vertical Distance between centroids of concrete slab and steel beam
=(250×2,850×(765+100+250/2)+(500×100×(765+100/2))+(100×100×((2/3)×100+765)))/((250×2,850)+(500×100)+(100×100))
= 975 mm

tf = Average thickness of top flange of the steel section = 22 mm


tw = thickness of web of the steel section = 14 mm
Xu = Depth of neutral axis at ultimate limit state of flexure from top of concrete
Mu = Ultimate bending moment
ϒm = Material safety factor for structural steel = 1.1 IRC 22-2015, Table 1, page 10
a= Constant = (fy / ϒm)/(0.36fck)
= (240/1.1)/(0.36×35)
= 17
Position of Plastic Neutral Axis
Assumed thickness of the deck slab is shown in the calculations below:
Depth of Slab is considered constant , but the width has been modified ds = 350.00 mm
(Calculation shown in composite girder properties, 5.3.9)
As per Table 1.1 IRC 22-2015 ,Pg 70, Plastic Moment capacity for composite section is given as:

Case Position of plastic neutral Value of xu Moment Capacity


axis

1 Within Slab
beff.ds > a.As xu = (a.As)/beff Mp =(Asfy (dc + 0.5ds - 0.42xu))/ϒm
(Refer Fig I.1, Pg 70, IRC 22 (2015))

2 Plastic Neutral Axis


in Steel Flange
beff.ds<a.As<(beff.ds+2a.Af) xu = ds +( (aAs - beff.ds)/2bfa) Mp ={ [As (dc + 0.08ds) - bf(xu - ds).(xu + 0.16ds)]}ϒm
(Refer Fig I.2, Pg 70, IRC 22 (2015))

3 Plastic Neutral Axis


in Web
beff.ds + 2a.Af < a.As xu = ds + tf + {a(As - 2Af) - beff.ds} / Mp = fy [ As(dc + 0.08ds) - 2Af(0.5tf + 0.58ds) - tw(xu - ds - tf) . (xu +
2atw 0.16ds + tf)] / ϒm
(Refer Fig I.3, Pg 70, IRC 22 (2015))

Hence, depth of the NA is calculated based on the following conditions:


Case 1 Plastic Neutral axis Within Slab
If beff x ds > a x As
772,500 < 1,004,878 N/A
Case 2 Plastic Neutral axis in Steel flange
If beff x ds < a x As < beff x ds + 2 a x Af
772,500 < 1,004,878 < 1,077,262 OK
Case 3 Plastic Neutral axis in Web
If beff x ds + 2 a x Af < a x As
1,077,262 > 1,004,878 N/A
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Based on the above calculations, the depth of the NA & Plastic moment capacity is found out for Case 2

Depth of neutral axis xu = 367 mm

Plastic Moment capacity Mp = 1.2083E+10 Nmm


= 12,083 kNm Usage 27.8%
Max design bending moment on the section = 3356 kNm OK
(5.1.6, Basic Combination, Girder G1)

Composite section (Outer Girder)


3,225

250 1,363 500 1,363 250


100 400 350 100
22 100

50

765
1,000
1,417 14 1,067

302

45
800

Figure 3.3 Cross section of Outer Composite Section

5.2.4 Moment of resistance of Composite Section (Outer Girder)


Bending Moment with full shear Interaction IRC:22 -2015, Clause 603.5.1-Annexure I, Page 70
Notation Af = Area of top flange of steel beam of a composite section = 8,800
mm2
As = Cross section area of steel beam of a composite section = 58,032
mm2
(Considering effective web area for plastic section,Refer 5.2.1.2)
beff = Effective width of concrete slab = 2,655 mm
bf = Width of top flange of steel section = 400 mm
ds = Overall depth of concrete slab = 350 mm
dc = Vertical Distance between centroids of concrete slab and steel beam
=(1,363×250×(765+100+250/2)+0.5×1,363×100×(765+100×2/3)+500×350×(765+350/2)+1,363×250×(765+100+250/2)+0.5×100×100×(765+100×2/3
))/(1,363×250+0.5×1,363×100+500×350+1,363×250+0.5×100×100)
= 969 mm

tf = Average thickness of top flange of the steel section = 22 mm


tw = thickness of web of the steel section = 14 mm
Xu = Depth of neutral axis at ultimate limit state of flexure from top of concrete
Mu = Ultimate bending moment
ϒm = Material safety factor for structural steel = 1.1 IRC 22-2015 Table 1, page 10
a= Constant = (fy / ϒm)/(0.36fck)
= (240/1.1)/(0.36×35)
= 17
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Position of Plastic Neutral Axis


The thickness of the deck slab is considered in the calculations below:
Depth of Slab is considered constant , but the width has been modified ds = 350 mm
(Calculation shown in composite girder properties, 5.3.9)
The depth of the NA is calculated based on the following conditions:
Case 1 Plastic Neutral axis Within Slab
If beff x ds > a x As
929,375 < 1,004,878 N/A
Case 2 Plastic Neutral axis in Steel flange
If beff x ds < a x As < beff x ds + 2 a x Af
929,375 < 1,004,878 < 1,234,137 OK
Case 3 Plastic Neutral axis in Web
If beff x ds + 2 a x Af < a x As
1,234,137 > 1,004,878 N/A

Based on the above calculations, the depth of the NA & Plastic moment capacity is found out for Case 2

Depth of neutral axis xu = 355 mm

Plastic Moment capacity Mp = 1.24.E+10 Nmm


= 12,422 kNm Usage 27.0%
Max design bending moment on the sec. = 3356 kNm OK
(5.1.6, Basic Combination, Girder G1)
5.2.5 Shear Resistance of Composite Section IRC:22-2015 clause 603.3.3.2 page 18
As vertical shear force is assumed to be resisted by the web of the steel section due to which
Shear Check is same for outer and inner girder.
Vd = Vn/ϒmo
Where,
Vd = Design Strength
Vn = Nominal shear resistance of the section
ϒmo = Partial safety factor against shear failure = 1.10 IRC 22-2015 Table 1, page 10

Nominal Shear strength may be governed by plastic shear resistance or strength of web as governed by shear buckling.

1) Plastic Shear Resistance:


Vn = Vp
Where, Vp = Av x fyw / √3
AV = Shear Area IRC:22-2015 clause 603.3.3.2 page 18
= d x tw
= 14000 mm2
fyw = Yield strength of the web

Vertical shear force is assumed to be resisted by the web of the steel section only, Hence as per clause 603.3.3.2 of IRC:22 2015
of area of web only considered.
Hence, Vp = 1939896.9 N
= 1940 kN

2) Shear Buckling Resistance:


Resistance to shear buckling shall be verified, when
d/tw > 67 ϵ √(Kv / 5.35) IRC 24-2010 clause 509.4.2.2-Page 92
71.43 > 71.36 OK

Where, Kv = Shear Buckling Coefficient IRC:22-2015 clause 603.3.3.2 page 20


= 5.83 when transverse stiffeners are provided with c/d >= 1
ϵ = √ (250 / fy)
The resistance to shear buckling is calculated by the following methods.
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

a) Simple Post Critical method


Vn = Vcr
Where,
Vcr = Shear force corresponding to web buckling
= Av x τb
τb = Shear stress corresponding to web buckling

τcr,e = kv π2 E / (12 (1 - μ2 )(d / tw )2)

= 206 MPa

λw = √(fyw / (√(3 τcr,e))


= 0.82

The shear stress corresponding to web buckling is calculated as follows:


When λw <= 0.8 τb = fyw / √3
When 0.8 < λw < 1.2 τb = (( 1 - 0.8 ) ( λw - 0.8 )) ( fyw / √3 )
When λw >= 1.2 τb = fyw /( √3 λw2)

Hence τb = 136.42 MPa

Hence Vcr = Av x τb
Vcr = 1909858 N
Vn = 1910 kN

b) Tension field method Tension field method is applicable

Vn = Vtf
Vtf = [ Av x τb + 0.9 wtf twfv sinφ] <= Vp
= 1909.8584 kN OK 1940
τb = Shear stress corresponding to web buckling
fv = Yield Strength of the tension field
= [fyw2 - 3 τb2 + ᵠ2]0.5 - ᵠ
6.83646288
ᵠ = 1.5 τb sin2φ
126.035516
ᵠ = Inclination of the tension filed = tan-1(d/c)
19.009618
wtf = Width of the tension filed
= d cosφ − (c - sc - st ) sin φ
681.19203
fyw = Yield stress of the Web
d = Depth of the Web
c = Spacing of the Stiffeners in the Web
τb = Shear stress corresponding to buckling of Web ( Cl. 509.4.2.2(a))
sc, st = Anchorage length of tension field along the compression and tension flange respectively, obtained from:
s = 2/sinφ [Mfr/fywtw]0.5<=c
= 1044.33515
Mfr = .25bftf2fyf [1-{Nf/(bftffyf/γmo)}2]
= 97200000 Kn
bf,tf = Width and thickness of the relevant flange respectively
fyf = Yield stress pf the flange

Nominal Shear strength is minimum of the above two methods.


Vn = 1910 kN
Design shear strength is obtained by deviding the nominal shear strength by the factor of safety.
Vd = 1,910/1.10
= 1736 kN
Maximum shear force in the critical girder = 1083 kN < 1736 kN
(5.1.6 , Basic Combination1 , Girder G2) OK
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.2.6 Design of Composite Section at Serviceability Limit State

The normal elastic analysis is used for finding out the design forces and stresses under various load combinations as per IRC:6-2010 and load factors as per
IRC:22-2015. The section is checked for the stresses and deflection at this limit state.
2,850

250 500 350


100 400
22
100
50

765

1,417 14
1,000 1,067

302

45

800
Figure 3.4 Cross section of Composite Section

Sectional Properties
Dist from
Width Depth Area Ixx Iyy Ibot
boot Ay A y2
Description B D A y bd3/12 db3/12 Ixx + Ay2
2
cm cm cm cm cm3 cm4 cm4 cm4 cm4
Top flange 40.00 2.20 88.00 105.60 9,293 9.81E+05 35 11733 9.8E+05
Web 1.40 100.00 140.00 54.50 7,630 4.16E+05 116667 23 5.3E+05
Bottom flange 80.00 4.50 360.00 2.25 810 1.82E+03 608 192000 2.4E+03
Slab 285.00 35.00 9,975 89.20 889,770 7.94E+07 1018281 67518281 8.0E+07
Σ 10,563.00 907,503 6.77E+07 8.2E+07

2
Area of concrete slab Inner Girder = 2,850×250+100×100+500×100 = 772,500 mm
2
Area of concrete slab Outer Girder =250×1,363+0.5×1,363×100+500×350+250×1,363+0.5×100×100 = 929,375 mm

Calculation of Modular Ratio & Section Properties


For calculating stresses and deflection in the structure, the modular ratio is calculated as mentioned in IRC:22-2015 for different stages of loading and the
final stresses and deflections are worked out separately for each stage of load history with the relevant modular ratio and the corresponding section modulus
and then added together.
Section Properties is calculated for inner and outer girder and presented below and same properties is used for analysis of structure.

5.2.7 Modular ratio for Permanent loads / Long term loads IRC 22-2015 clause 604.3-Page 23
Modular ratio m = Es / ( Kc*Ec )
where
Kc = Creep factor
= 0.5
m = 200,000/(0.5×31,000)
= 12.5 < 15.0
Hence modular ratio in design = 15.00

5.2.8 Modular ratio for Transient loads / Short term loads


Modular ratio m = Es / Ec IRC 22-2015 clause 604.3-Page 23

m = (200,000/31,000)
= 6.45 < 7.5
Hence modular ratio in design = 7.50
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.2.9 Sectional Properties of inner girder at service stage


a) Long Term Loads
The equivalent area of concrete slab is calculated by dividing the effective width of concrete slab by the modular ratio.
Modified effective width of slab = (2850 x 250 + 500 x 100 + (0.5 x100 x 100 x 2 ) ) / 350
= 2,207
Equivant width of concrete slab =2,207/15.00 = 147 mm
147

400 350

22

676

14 1,417
1,000 1,067

741

45

800
Figure 3.5 Cross section of Composite Section for Permanent Load

Sectional Properties
Dist from
Width Depth Area Ixx Iyy Ibot IT
bot Ay A y2
Description B D A y BD3/12 DB3/12 Ixx + Ay2 ∑dt3/3
2
cm cm cm cm cm3 cm4 cm4 cm4 cm4 cm4
Top flange 40.00 2.20 88.00 105.60 9,293 9.81E+05 35 11733 9.8E+05 1.4E+02
Web 1.40 100.00 140.00 54.50 7,630 4.16E+05 116667 23 5.3E+05 4.7E+05
Bottom flange 80.00 4.50 360.00 2.25 810 1.82E+03 608 192000 2.4E+03 2.4E+03
Slab 14.71 35.00 515.00 124.20 63,963 7.94E+06 52573 9292 8.0E+06 2.1E+05
Σ 1,103.00 81,696 2.13E+05 9.5E+06 6.8E+05

ytopsl top of concrete slab = 68 cm


ytop top of steel flange = 33 cm
ybot = 74 cm
IZZ = 3,462,109 cm4
Iyy = 213,048 cm4
Ztopsl top of concrete slab = 51,190 cm3
Ztop top of steel top flange = 106,092 cm3
Zbot bot of steel bot flange = 46,743 cm3
Ixx = 679,530 cm4
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

b) Short Term Loads


The equivalent area of concrete slab is calculated by dividing the effective width of concrete slab by the modular ratio.
Modified effective width of slab = (2850 x 250 + 500 x 100 + (0.5 x100 x 100 x 2 ) ) / 350
= 2,207
Equivalent width of concrete slab =2,207/7.50 = 294 mm
294

400 350

22

517

14 1,417
1,000 1,067
900

45

800
Figure 3.6 Cross section of Composite Section for Transient Load

Sectional Properties
Dist from
Width Depth Area Ixx Iyy Ibot IT
bot Ay A y2
Description B D A y BD3/12 DB3/12 Ixx + Ay2 ∑dt3/3
cm cm cm2 cm cm3 cm4 cm4 cm4 cm4 cm4
Top flange 40.00 2.20 88.00 105.60 9,293 9.81E+05 35 11733 9.8E+05 1.4E+02
Web 1.40 100.00 140.00 54.50 7,630 4.16E+05 116667 23 5.3E+05 4.7E+05
Bottom flange 80.00 4.50 360.00 2.25 810 1.82E+03 608 192000 2.4E+03 2.4E+03
Slab 29.43 35.00 1,030.00 124.20 127,926 1.59E+07 105146 74335 1.6E+07 4.2E+05
Σ 1,618.00 145,659 278,091 17,509,842 8.9E+05

ytopsl top of concrete slab = 52 cm


ytop top of steel flange = 17 cm
ybot = 90 cm
Izz = 4,397,057 cm4
Iyy = 278,091 cm4
Ztopsl top of concrete slab = 66,996 cm3
Ztop top of steel top flange = 207,610 cm3
Zbot bot of steel bot flange = 38,458 cm3
Ixx = 889,822 cm3
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.2.10 Sectional Properties of outer girder at service stage


a) Long Term Loads
The equivalent area of concrete slab is calculated by dividing the effective width of concrete slab by the modular ratio.
= (3225 x 250 + 500 x 100 + (0.5 x100 x 100 x 2 ) +(0.5 x1362.5 x 100 x 2 ) ) / 350
= 2,655
Equivant width of concrete slab =2,655/15.0 = 177 mm
177

400 350

22

633

14 1,417
1,000 1,067
784

45

800
Figure 3.5 Cross section of Composite Section for Parmanent Load
Sectional Properties
Dist from
Width Depth Area Ixx Iyy Ibot IT
bot Ay A y2
Description B D A y BD3/12 DB3/12 Ixx + Ay2 ∑dt3/3
2 3
cm cm cm cm cm cm4 cm4 cm4 cm4 cm4
Top flange 40.00 2.20 88.00 105.60 9,293 9.81E+05 35 11733 9.8E+05 1.4E+02
Web 1.40 100.00 140.00 54.50 7,630 4.16E+05 116667 23 5.3E+05 4.7E+05
Bottom flange 80.00 4.50 360.00 2.25 810 1.82E+03 608 192000 2.4E+03 2.4E+03
Slab 17.70 35.00 619.58 124.20 76,952 9.56E+06 63249 16180 9.6E+06 2.5E+05
Σ 1,207.58 94,685 219,936 11,137,005 7.2E+05

ytopsl top of concrete slab = 63 cm


ytop top of steel flange = 28 cm
ybot = 78.41 cm
IZZ = 3,712,873 cm4
Iyy = 219,936 cm4
Ztopsl top of concrete slab = 58,663 cm3
Ztop top of steel top flange = 131,237 cm3
Zbot bot of steel bot flange = 47,353 cm3
Ixx = 722,235 cm4
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

b) Short Term Loads


The equivalent area of concrete slab is calculated by dividing the effective width of concrete slab by the modular ratio.
= (3225 x 250 + 500 x 100 + (0.5 x100 x 100 x 2 ) +(0.5 x1362.5 x 100 x 2 ) ) / 350
= 2,655
Equivant width of concrete slab =2,655/7.50 = 354 mm

354.05 mm

400 mm 350 mm

22 mm

477.64 mm

14 mm
1417 mm
1000 mm 1067 mm

939.36 mm

45 mm

800 mm
Figure 3.6 Cross section of Composite Section for Transient Load

Sectional Properties
Dist from
Width Depth Area Ixx Iyy Ibot IT
bot Ay A y2
Description B D A y BD3/12 DB3/12 Ixx + Ay2 ∑dt3/3
cm cm cm2 cm cm 3
cm4
cm4 cm4 cm4 cm4
Top flange 40.00 2.20 88.00 105.60 9,293 9.81E+05 35 11733 9.8E+05 1.4E+02
Web 1.40 100.00 140.00 54.50 7,630 4.16E+05 116667 23 5.3E+05 4.7E+05
Bottom flange 80.00 4.50 360.00 2.25 810 1.82E+03 608 192000 2.4E+03 2.4E+03
Slab 35.40 35.00 1,239.17 124.20 153,905 1.91E+07 126498 129441 1.9E+07 5.1E+05
Σ 1,827.17 171,637 2.44E+05 3.33E+05 2.1E+07 9.8E+05

ytopsl top of concrete slab = 48 cm


ytop top of steel flange = 12.8 cm
ybot = 94 cm
Izz = 4,634,749 cm4
Iyy = 333,197 cm4
Ztopsl top of concrete slab = 97,035 cm3
Ztop top of steel top flange = 363,120 cm3
Zbot bot of steel bot flange = 49,339 cm3
Ixx = 975,232 cm4
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.3 Check for Stresses in the Member

The stresses in the member at the critical section i.e. midspan are checked for rare combination as per IRC:6-2010. The final stresses in the member are
calculated separately for each loading stage of load history with relevant section properties and then added together.

As the outer girder is critical ,the following section properties of outer girder are used at different stages of loading.

A Ixx Ztopsl Ztop Zbot


Sl. No. Section
mm2 mm4 mm3 mm3 mm3
1 Outer Permanent / long term Loads 1.21E+05 3.7E+10 5.9E+07 1.3E+08 4.7E+07
2 Girder Transient / short term Loads 1.8E+05 4.6E+10 9.7E+07 3.6E+08 4.9E+07
3 Inner Permanent / long term Loads 1.1E+05 3.5E+10 5.1E+07 1.1E+08 4.6743E+07
4 Girder Transient / short term Loads 1.6E+05 4.4E+10 6.7E+07 2.1E+08 3.8E+07

5.3.1 Bending Moments in Girders for Rare Combinations (Refer 5.1.6)


Bending Moment at Midspan
Sl. No. Loading G1 G2 G3
kNm kNm kNm
1 Dead Load (girder + slab) 1,212 1,212 1,212
2 SIDL 215 215 215
3 Surfacing 192 192 192
4 Differential Shrinkage N.A N.A N.A
5 Thermal Loads N.A N.A N.A
6 Vehicular Live Load 1,286 1,286 1,286
7 Footpath Live Load 0 10 10

5.3.2 Stresses in Composite Section for Rare Combination


Load Combination is as per IRC6:2010, Table 3.3 Page 70

Girder G1 Girder G2
Sl. No. Loading σtops σbots σtopg σbotg σtops σbots σtopg σbotg
MPa MPa MPa MPa MPa MPa MPa MPa
1 Dead Load (girder + slab) 1.38 0.62 94.53 37.24 0.53 0.26 94.53 37.24
2 SIDL 0.24 0.11 1.64 4.54 0.28 0.14 2.03 4.60
3 Surfacing 0.22 0.10 1.46 4.05 0.25 0.12 1.81 4.11
4 Differential Shrinkage 0.13 0.77 30.43 3.42 0.19 0.81 29.89 3.38
5 Thermal Loads 0.17 1.29 9.65 21.16 0.08 1.36 10.19 21.25
6 Vehicular Live Load 1.77 0.47 3.54 26.06 2.56 0.83 6.19 33.43
7 Footpath Live Load 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.26
Comb 1 Live load as leading load 3.84 2.83 137.39 88.01 3.87 2.97 140.61 95.78
Comb 2 Thermal load as leading load 3.47 3.23 140.37 89.96 3.26 3.30 143.12 95.85
Note: Comb 1 live load is considered as leading load, the factor for thermal load is 0.6
Comb 2: Thermal is considered as leading load, the factor for live load is 0.75

Girder G3
Sl. No. Loading σtops σbots σtopg σbotg
MPa MPa MPa MPa
1 Dead Load (girder + slab) 1.58 0.76 11.43 25.93
2 SIDL 0.28 0.14 2.03 4.60
4 Differential Shrinkage 0.19 0.81 29.89 3.38
5 Thermal Loads 0.08 1.36 10.19 21.25
6 Vehicular Live Load 2.56 0.83 6.19 33.43
7 Footpath Live Load 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.26
Comb 1 Live load as leading load 4.923 3.473 57.504 84.464
Comb 2 Thermal load as leading load 4.312 3.809 60.019 84.543
***σtops Stress at slab top σtopg Stress at girder top
σbots Stress at slab bottom σbotg Stress at girder bottom
Permissible bending stress in concrete = 16.80 MPa
Permissible elastic stress in structural steel 0.87xfytk = 209 MPa

Maximum bending stress in concrete = 4.92 MPa OK


Maximum elastic stress in structural steel = 143.12 MPa OK
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.4 Check for Deflection in the Member

Construction Stage
Partial
Girder G1 Girder G2 Girder G3
Sr. No. Description Safety Impact factor
factor Deflection (mm)

1 Steel girder Self Weight 1.00 - 3.000 3.000 3.000


3 Slab - Green Concrete 1.00 - 6.000 6.000 6.000
Construction Load Combination 9.00 9.00 9.00
During Construction Stage Inner Girder Outer Girder
i) Deflection due to Self Weight 3.000 3.000 These delections are incurred when
ii) Deflection due to Slab 6.000 6.000 the concrete is in green stage
Sum 9.00 9.00
Hence, Provide Camber of 52.00 mm at Both the Splice Locations

Service Stage

The deflection in the member at the critical section i.e. midspan is checked for frequent combination as per IRC:6-2010. The final deflection in the member is
calculated separately for each loading stage of load history with relevant section properties and then added together.

Partial
Girder G1 Girder G2 Girder G3
Sr. No. Description Safety Impact factor
factor Deflection (mm)

1 Steel girder + Slab 1.00 - 9.000 9.000 9.000


3 SIDL without surfacing 1.00 - 2.000 2.000 2.000
4 Surfacing (Wearing Coat) 1.20 - 1.000 1.000 1.000
5 Class A - 2 Lane Comb. of 70R+ClassA 0.75 129%
6 Class A - 1 Lane Ecc 0.75 129% 5.00 5.00 5.00
9 70R Wheeled Ecc 0.75 127%
10 70R Wheeled Concentric 0.75 127%
12 70R Tracked Eccentric 0.75 110%
13 Foot Path LL 0.75 110%
Frequent Load Combination 17.02 17.02 16.82

As per clause 7.2, Annex B of IRC 6 (2010), defelection check shall be carried out using partial safety factors given in
Column 3, of Table 3.3 (Verification of Serviceability limit state)

Frequent load combination: DL(Steel+Slab) + SIDL + SIDL (WC) + 0.75x(Max Live Load) 12.00 12.00 12.00

Permissible total deflection = Span / 600 IRC 22-2015 clause 604.3.2-Page 24

= 18.00×1000/600
= 30.0 mm

Permissible deflection due to live load alone = Span / 800 IRC 22-2015 clause 604.3.2-Page 24
= 18.00×1000/800
= 22.5 mm

Max deflection in girder due to LL alone = 5.00 mm OK


Max total deflection in girder Service Stage = 17.02 mm OK
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.4.1 Design for Fatigue Limit: (IRC 22: 2015) IRC 22:2015 Clause605 Pg. 25
The actual normal and shear stress range "f " and "τ " at any point of the strucuture subjected to Nsc cycles in life shall

f =< 27/γmft = 21.60 MPa


satisfy the following:
f <= f fd = μ r f f / γ mft (normal /flexure stress) IRC 22:2015 Clause 605.4 Pg. 34

τ <= τ fd = μ r τ f / γ mft (shear stress)


where,
μr = capacity reduction factorfor fillet or butt joint IRC 22-2015, Clause 605.2 Pg 26

= (25 / tp)0.25 <= 1.0 (for plate thickness tp greater than 25 mm) ,
γ mft = partial safety factor against fatigue falilure, IRC 22-2015,Table 3 Pg 27

ff , τf = normal and shear fatigue stress ranges for the actual life cycle, Nsc,
tp = actual thickness in mm of the thicker plate being joined. 2.0833 2.08
1.20
For normal stress range,
ff = f fn (5 x 10 6 / N sc ) 1/3 when, Nsc <= 5 x 106
= f fn (5 x 10 6 / N sc ) 1/5 when, 5 x 106 <= Nsc <= 1 x 108
For shear stress range,
τf = τ fn (5 x 10 6 / N sc ) 1/5
f fn , τ fn = normal and shear fatigue strength of the detail for 5 x 106 cycles, for the detail category as per
IRC 22-2015 Table 4 through Table 6
Note: Partial safety factor for "loads" in the evaluation of stress range in fatigue design shall be taken as 1.0

Thickness of Bottom flange plate = 45 mm


Thickness of Top Flange plate = 22 mm
Thickness of Web = 14
μr (Bottom flange plate) = 0.86 (tp > 25 mm)
μr (Top Flange plate) = 1.00 (tp <= 25 mm)
μr (Web Plate) = 1.00 (tp <= 25 mm)
Number of stress cycles, Nsc = 2.00E+06 MODIFIED
For Welded Plate I-Section and Box girder with Continuous automatic longitudinal fillet welds carried out from both sides
and all welds not having un-repaired stop start position Detail Category 92 is referred of IRC:22-2015 , Table 5, Page 28
Detail category = 92
τ fn , f fn = 92 MPa
6 1/5
.`. τ f = τ fn (5 x 10 / N sc ) =92×(5×10^6/2.00E+06)^(1/5) = 111 MPa
.`. f f = f fn (5 x 10 6 / N sc ) 1/3 =92×(5×10^6/2.00E+06)^(1/5) = 125 MPa
γ mft (Table 5, IRC 22-2015) = 1.35 (Fail-Safe) MODIFIED
Bending fatigue strength, ffd = 70.0 MPa
Shear fatigue strength, τfd = 79.0 MPa

Evaluation of Actual shear stress range (LL with impact):


Moment of Inertia of Cross-section for Short Term Loading = 4.63E+10 mm4
Properties of
Ybottom of Section = 939 mm Outer Girder
Ytop of Section = 478 mm

Maximum Bending Moment in Section (Live Load Only Considered) = 1,286 kNm

Maximum Shear Force in Section = 411 kN

Shear Stress in Section =411×1000/(1,000×14) = 29.39 MPa OK


Bending Stress in Top flange of Section =1,286×10^6×478/4.63E+10 = 13.25 MPa OK
Bending Stress in Bottom flange of Section =1,286×10^6×939/4.63E+10 = 26.06 MPa OK
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.6.1 Ultimate Limit State (Strength Criteria) (As per IRC: 22-2015 Clause 606.4.1)

Outer Girder Inner Girder


Impact Partial Shear Shear Shear Shear Shear
Shear Force
Type Description Factor Safety Force at Force at Force at Force at Force at
at 1st splice
Factor Support 2nd splice Support 1st splice 2nd splice
kN kN kN kN kN kN
Steel girder and Slab 100% 1.35 195 195 195 195 195 195
Long
Term SIDL without surfacing 100% 1.35 85 85 85 85 85 85
Load
Surfacing (Wearing Coat) 100% 1.75 50 50 50 50 50 50
Short Vechicular Live Load 127% 1.50 320 320 320 320 320 320
Term
Load Footpath Live Load 100% 1.50 5 0 0 5 0 0

(IRC:22-2015 Clause 606.4.1, Pg 40)


The longitudinal shear per unit length is given by VL V . Aec Y 
= ∑  I 
 dl ,ll
Where,
VL = Longitudinal shear per unit length
V = Vertical Shear forces due to dead load and live load (with impact)
Aec = The transformed compressive area of concrete above neutral axis of composite cross section considering appropriate
modular ratio with respect to nature of load
Y = C.G distance of transformed copncrete area from neutral axis
I Moment of inertia of whole concrete section using appropriate modular ratio

Spacing of shear connectors for above case is given by, SL1 = ∑Q u

VL
Where,
Qu = Ultimate Static strength of shear connector (Taken as sum of static strengths of all studs in given section)
-For Outer Girder :-

Shear Shear Shear VL at 6m


VL at VL at 12m
Type Description Force at Force at Force at Aec Y I from
Support from support
Support 6m 12m support

kN kN kN m2 m m4 kN/m
Steel (Selfweight) 263.25 263.25 263.25 6.20E-02 0.46 3.71E-02 201.16 201.16 201.16
Slab 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.20E-02 0.46 3.71E-02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Long SIDL without Surfacing 114.75 114.75 114.75 6.20E-02 0.46 3.71E-02 87.68 87.68 87.68
Term
Load Surface (Wearing coat) 87.50 87.50 87.50 6.20E-02 0.46 3.71E-02 66.86 66.86 66.86
Differential Shrinkage 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.15E-02 0.50 3.46E-02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Temperature 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.15E-02 0.50 3.46E-02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Short Vechicular Live Load 610.47 610.47 610.47 1.24E-01 0.30 4.63E-02 493.96 493.96 493.96
Term
Load Footpath Live Load 7.50 0.00 0.00 1.24E-01 0.30 4.63E-02 6.07 0.00 0.00
Sum 855.74 849.67 849.67
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

-For Inner Girder :-


Shear Shear Shear VL at 6m
VL at VL at 12m
Type Description Force at Force at Force at Aec Y I from
Support from support
Support 6m 12m support
kN kN kN m2 m m4 kN/m
Steel (Selfweight) 263.25 263.25 263.25 5.15E-02 0.50 3.46E-02 196.32 196.32 196.32
Slab 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.15E-02 0.50 3.46E-02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Long SIDL without Surfacing 114.75 114.75 114.75 0.50
5.15E-02 3.46E-02 85.57 85.57 85.57
Term
Load Surface (Wearing coat) 87.50 87.50 87.50 5.15E-02 0.50 3.46E-02 65.25 65.25 65.25
Differential Shrinkage 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.15E-02 0.50 3.46E-02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Temperature 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.15E-02 0.50 3.46E-02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Short Vechicular Live Load 610.47 610.47 610.47 0.34
1.03E-01 4.40E-02 488.72 488.72 488.72
Term
Load Footpath Live Load 7.50 0.00 0.00 1.03E-01 0.34 4.40E-02 6.00 0.00 0.00
Sum 841.87 835.87 835.87
Therefore spacing of shear connectors SL1 is given as,
Spacing Required at Support = 280 mm
Spacing Required 1st splice = 282 mm
Spacing required at 2nd splice = 282 mm

5.6.2 Full Shear Connection (IRC:22-2015 Clause 606.4.1.1, Page 40)

Maximum horizontal force in the slab (H):


Minimum of H1 & H2
H1 =Asl fy 10-3/γm
H2 =0.36 fck Aec 10-3
Where,
Asl = Area of tensile steel in longitudinal direction (mm2)
Aec = Effective area of concrete
= beff.Xu for NA within Slab and beff.ds for NA in steel section

Spacing of Shear Connector (m) SL2 = ( ΣQu / H ) . L


Asl Aec ᵞm H1 H2 L SL2
Sr. No. Member
mm2 mm2 kN kN m mm
1 Outer Girder 55852 929375 1.25 10724 11710 9.0 201
2 Inner Girder 51322 772500 1.25 9854 9734 9.0 222
* L = Length between max BM and Support

5.6.3 Serviceability Limit State (Limit State of Fatigue) (IRC:22-2015 Clause 606.4.2, Page 41)

Calculate shear Vr at interface due to live load and iMPact

V R . Aec Y 
Vr =
∑  I 
 ll
Where,
VR = Vertical shear difference due to maximum and minimum shear envolop due to live load and impact

Shear Shear Shear Vr at 6m


Vr at Vr at 12m
Type Description Force at Force at Force at Aec Y I from
Support from support
Support 5m 10m support
Short Term Load kN kN kN m2 m m4 kN/m kN/m kN/m
Outer Vechicular Live Load 406.98 406.98 406.98 1.24E-01 0.30 4.63E-02 329.31 329.31 329.31
Girder Footpath Live Load 5.00 0.00 0.00 1.24E-01 0.30 4.63E-02 4.05 0.00 0.00
Inner Vechicular Live Load 406.98 406.98 406.98 1.03E-01 0.34 4.40E-02 325.82 325.82 325.82
Girder Footpath Live Load 5.00 0.00 0.00 1.03E-01 0.34 4.40E-02 4.00 0.00 0.00
Max.Sum 333.35 329.31 329.31
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Spacing Required at Support = 225 mm


Spacing Required 1st splice = 228 mm
Spacing required at 2nd splice = 228 mm

5.6.4 Check for Transverse Shear (IRC:22-2015 Clause 606.6, Page 42)

Longitudinal Shear transferred from the steel girder to slab is further distributed in the transverse direction through the
transverse strength of the slab as well as the transverse reinforcemnent provided at the section.
The transverse strength and amount of trnsverse steel needs to be checked as per formulas given below. (IRC:22-2015 Clause 606.10, Page 44)

The shear force transferred per metre length should satisfy both the following conditions:

1) VL ≤ 0.632 L f ck
855.74 < 1,645.14 OK

2) VL ≤ 0.232 L f ck + 0.1Ast . f st .n
855.74 < 5,519.41 OK
Where,
VL = Longitudinal shear force per unit length calculated for Ultimate Limit State in kN/m = 856 kN/m
fck = Characteristic strength of concrete in MPa = 35 MPa
fst = Yield strength of transverse reinforcement in MPa = 435 MPa
L = Length of possible shear plane envelope (as per Fig.11, Pg 45, IRC 22-2015) in mm = 440 mm

n = No. of times each lower transverse reinforcing bar is intersected by a shear surface = 2.00

Ast = 2
Sectional area of transverse reinforcement in cm per metre run of beam < 2.5VL / fst 2
cm /m
= 56.50 cm2/m 2.5VL / fst = 4.92 cm2/m
OK
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.7 Design of Stiffeners (IRC:24-2010 Clause 509.7)


5.7.1 Design of Intermediate Stiffeners
Stiffener is provided as intermediate transverse web stiffeners. Connection of stiffener to flange will be provided for Load Bearing stiffener.
A gap of 40 mm is to be provided between bottom flange and stffener not greater than 4tw OK
(IRC:24-2010, Clause 509.7.2.6)
Depth of Stiffener, d d = 960 mm
Spacing of Transverse stiffeners c = 2,900 mm
Thickness of Stiiffner (tq) = 12 mm
Consider ,Outstand of Web stiffener = 160 mm

Outstand of Web stiffener <= 20tq ϵ = 245 OK

14tq ϵ = 171 (IRC:24-2010 Clause 509.7.1.2)

When outstand is between 14tq ϵ and 20tq ϵ, then the stiffener design should be on the basis of a core section with an outstand of 14tq ϵ

Hence, stiffener shall be designed using 160 mm Outstand

Minimum Stiffener Required (IRC:24-2010 Clause 509.7.2.4)


For transverse stiffeners not subjected to external loads following conditions need to be satisfied

if c/d ≥ 1.4142 Applicable Is >= 0.75 d tw 3 2058000


and
if c/d < 1.4142 Not Applicable Is >= 1.5 d 3 tw 3 4.89E+05
25.00
c2
Now,
c/d = 2.9 3.73E+07 > 2.06E+06 mm4 OK

Buckling Resistance of Stiffener (IRC:24-2010 Clause 509.7.1.5)

stiffener
280 mm 280 mm

14 mm Web

160 mm

Effective Length of Transverse stiffener 0.7 x L = 672 mm


Core Area = 11848 mm2
Considering 20 times web thickness (20tw) of web on both side of stiffener = 280 mm
Moment of Inertia of core area = 3.73E+07 mm4
Radius of Gyration,r = I/A = 56 mm
KL/r = 12
For any solid section, As per Table 4 of IRC 24-2010, page 49 Section lies in buckling Class C

KL/r Yield Stress fy, (MPa) fy =240 For (IRC 24:2010 Table 6c)
380 400 240 KL/r =12
20 345 364 212
217.0
28 312 327 207

Design compressive stress fcd = 217 MPa

Buckling Resistance of Member Fqd =217.019×11848/1000 = 2571 kN


SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Shear Buckling Force (IRC:24-2010 Clause 509.7.2.5 and Clause 509.4.2.2)

Fq = V-Vcr < Fqd


ϒmo
= 1,083.47 kN (Refer 5.7.1)
Where, Vn = Vcr

Vcr = Shear force corresponding to web buckling


τb = Av x τb
= Shear stress corresponding to web buckling
Av = Shear Area (Area of Web)
= 14×1,000
= 14,000 mm2

λw = f yw
( 3 )( τ cr ,e )

= 0.92

τcr,e = Kv π2 E / (12 (1 - μ2 )(d / tw )2)


= (6×3.14^2×2.0E+05)/(12×(1-0.3^2)×(960/12)^2)
= 163 MPa

Kv = Shear Buckling Coefficient


= 5.35 When transverse stiffeners are provided only at support
= 4.0+5.35 / (c/d)2 for c/d<1
= 5.35+4 / (c/d)2 for c/d>=1

c/d = 2,900/960 = 3.02


Kv = 5.79

When λw <= 0.8 τb = fyw / √3


When 0.8 < λw < 1.2 τb = (( 1 - 0.8 ) ( λw - 0.8 )) ( fyw / √3 )
When λw >= 1.2 τb = fyw /( √3 λw2)

Hence τb = 125.19 MPa

Hence Vcr = Av x τb
Vcr = 1752.69 kN

Buckling Resistance of Member Fqd = 2571 kN


Stiffener Force Fq =(1,083.47-1752.69)/1.10 = -510 kN OK

Hence provide 160 mm x 12 mm stiffeners on both side of web


SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

5.7.2 Design of End Load Bearing Stiffeners


Depth of web, d d = 1,000 mm
Spacing of Transverse stiffeners c = 2,900 mm
Thickness of Stiffener = 12 mm
Outstand of Web stiffener = 140 mm

Outstand of Web stiffener 20tq ϵ = 245 OK

14tq ϵ = 171
When outstand is between 14tq ϵ and 20tq ϵ, then the stiffener design should be on the basis of a core section with an outstand of 14tq ϵ

Hence, stiffener shall be designed using 140 mm Outstand

Therefore core area of stiffener on each side = 140 mm x 12mm .


Moment of Inertia of Stiffer @ CG of web = 2.54E+07 mm4
Effective Length of Transverse stiffener 0.7 x L = 700 mm
Considering 20 times web thickness of web on both side of stiffener = 280 mm
Core area = 11368 mm2
Moment of Inertia of core area = 2.55E+07 mm4
Radius of Guration I/A = 191 mm
KL/r = 3.7

For any solid section, As per Table 4 of IRC 24-2010, page 49 Section lies in buckling Class C

KL/r Yiel Stress fy, (MPa) fy =240 For (IRC 24:2010 Table 6c)
240 250 240 KL/r =3.66
10 345 364 345
353.2
20 332 348 332
Design compressive stress fcd = 353 MPa
Buckling Resistance of Member =353.236×11368/1000 = 4016 kN
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Shear Buckling Force (IRC:24-2010 Clause 509.7.2.5 and Clause 509.4.2.2)

Fq = V-Vcr
ϒmo

Factored Shear Force from End Cross Girder V = 1,668 kN


Factored Shear Force adjacent to the stiffener V = 2,751 kN
Where, Vn = Vcr (Sum of SF at support from 5.7.1)

Vcr = Shear force corresponding to web buckling


τb = Av x τb
= Shear stress corresponding to web buckling
Av = Shear Area (Area of Web)
= 14,000 =14×1,000

λw = √(fyw / (√(3 τcr,e))


= 0.96

τcr,e = Kv π E / (12 (1 - μ2 )(d / tw )2)


2

=(6×3.14^2×0.0E+00)/(12×(1-0.0^2)×(0/0)^2)
= 152 MPa

Kv = Shear Buckling Coefficient


= 5.35 When transverse stiffeners are provided only at support
= 4.0+5.35 / (c/d)2 for c/d<1
= 5.35+4 / (c/d)2 for c/d>=1

c/d = 2.9 =2,900/1,000


Kv = 5.83

When λw <= 0.8 τb = fyw / √3


When 0.8 < λw < 1.2 τb = (( 1 - 0.8 ) ( λw - 0.8 )) ( fyw / √3 )
When λw >= 1.2 τb = fyw /( √3 λw2) 330

Hence τb = 0.00 MPa

Hence Vcr = Av x τb
Vcr = 0.00 kN

Buckling Resistance of Member Fqd = 4,016 kN


Shear Buckling resistance of web panel Fq = 2751 kN OK

Load bearing stiffeners must satisfy the following interaction expression :


(IRC:24 :2010, Clause 509.7.2.5 Page 105)
Fq-Fx + Fx + Mq < 1
Fqd Fxd Myq

Fq = Stiffener Force
= 2,751.47
Fqd = Design resistance of an intermediate web stiffener corresponding to buckling
@ an axis parallel to the web
= 4,015.59
Fx = External load or reaction at the stiffener
= 2,751.47
If Fq < Fx then Fq-Fx = 0.00
SABZ INFRA SOLUTION PVT LTD
REHABILATION AND UPGRADATION OF PRATAPGANJ TO ALLAHABAD BYPASS ROAD JUNCTION SECTION OF NH-96
Date
Project FROM EXISTING KM 100/800 TO KM 135/230 (DESIGN CH: 100.800 TO CH: 135.500) TO FOUR LANE WITH PAVED
Document No. ALLA-01
No. SHOULDERS IN THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION (EPC) BASIS
CONTRACT.
20-Aug-19

Designed Checked Approved


100/800-
DESIGN OF 46m COMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER
135/230
VIKAS NARESH AYAZ

Mq = 1.2 Ze fy /ϒmo
=1.2×1,000/2×240/1.10/1000
= 130.9 kNm

Mq = Moment on the stiffener due to eccentriclly applied load and transverse load
= 0.00 No External Moment acting on stiffener as stiffener is connected to flange
Myq = Yield Moment Capacity of the stiffener bassed on its elastic modulus about
its centroidal axis parallel to the web
= 130.91

0.69 < 1 OK
Check stiffener for load bearing
Bearing stiffeners should be provided for webs where force applied through a flange by loads or reaction exceed the local capacity
of the web and its connection to the flange
Local Capacity of Web
Fw = (b1+n2) tw fyw/ϒmo
b1 = Stiff Bearing Length = 54 mm
54

22 mm
Top Flange
Web

14 mm

n2 = Length Obtained by dispersion through the flange to the web junction


at a slope of 1:2.5 to the plane of the flange
= 59.2

22
Top Flange
1 Detail A
22.00 n2 Web
2.5
(IRC:24 :2010 , Clause 509.7.4, Page 106)
55
Detail A
tw = Thickness of the web
fyw = Yiled stress of the web
Force transferred through Flanges = 2,751 kN
Local Capacity of web Fw = 346 kN
Bearing stiffener Required
Bearing stiffener is designed for = V-Fw = =2,751-346 = 2406 kN

Bearing Capacity of stiffener alone, Fpsd = Aq . f yq =353.24×11368/(1000×0.8x1.1) 2749 kN OK


0.8γ m 0
Bearing capacity of stiffener is greater than load coming on stiffener, hence the stiffener is safe as a load bearing stiffener

Hence provide stiffener of size 140 x 12 as end bearing stiffener

S-ar putea să vă placă și