Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

Individual Performance Profile

PN Fundamentals 2011 Form B

Individual Name: SHARLENE SERBIN Adjusted Individual Total Score: 73.3%


Student Number: ATI Proficiency Level: Level 2
Institution: Beaumont Adult School Mean - National: 61.8%
Program Type: PN Percentile Rank - National: 84
Test Date: 2/27/2014
# of Questions: 60 Focused Review Time 6 min

Individual Performance in the Major Content Areas


# Individual Mean Percentile Rank Individual Score (% Correct)
Sub-Scale Items Score National National

Coordinated Care 7 100.0% 70.1% 99

Safety and Infection 13 76.9% 68.4% 75


Control
Health Promotion and 7 71.4% 60.0% 1
Maintenance
Psychosocial Integrity 5 60.0% 60.0% 87

Basic Care and Comfort 15 66.7% 60.0% 99

Pharmacological 4 75.0% N/A N/A


Therapies
Reduction of Risk 7 57.1% 60.6% 99
Potential
Physiological Adaptations 2 100.0% N/A N/A

NOTE: Means and percentile ranks are not presented for sub-scales with fewer than five items.

Please see page 4 for an explanation of the Scores and Topics to Review sections Page 1 of 4

Report Created on: 9/7/2019 12:06 PM EDT REP_COMP_3_0_IndividualProctored_3_0


Topics To Review

Safety and Infection Control (3 items)


Accident/Error/Injury Prevention (1 item)
Client Safety: Reinforcing Client Education About Falls (Basic Concept, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 12)
Restraints and Safety Devices (1 item)
Client Safety: Use of a Belt Restraint (Nursing Skill, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 12)
Standard Precautions/Transmission-Based Precautions/Surgical Asepsis (1 item)
Medical and Surgical Asepsis: Sterile Field (Nursing Skill, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 10)

Health Promotion and Maintenance (2 items)


Aging Process (1 item)
Middle Adult (35 to 65 Years): Health Promotion (Growth and Development, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 24)
Health Promotion/Disease Prevention (1 item)
Sources of Nutrition: High-Protein Foods (RM Nutrition 4.0 Chp 1, Basic Concept)

Psychosocial Integrity (2 items)


Mental Health Concepts (1 item)
Hygiene: Oral Care (Basic Concept, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 37)
Therapeutic Communication (1 item)
Grief, Loss, and Palliative Care: Assisting Family with Loss (Basic Concept, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 36)

Basic Care and Comfort (5 items)


Assistive Devices (1 item)
Mobility and Immobility: Teaching Use of a Cane (Nursing Skill, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 40)
Nutrition and Oral Hydration (3 items)
Fluid and Electrolyte Imbalances: Findings to Report (Basic Concept, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 56)
Nutrition and Oral Hydration: Data Collection of a Client Who Is Malnourished (Basic Concept, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp
39)
Nutrition and Oral Hydration: Enteral Tube Feedings (Nursing Skill, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 39)
Personal Hygiene (1 item)
Grief, Loss, and Palliative Care: Priority Action (Nursing Skill, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 36)

Pharmacological Therapies (1 item)


Dosage Calculation (1 item)
Dosage Calculation: Administering Medication to a School-Age Child (RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 48)

Reduction of Risk Potential (3 items)


Changes/Abnormalities in Vital Signs (1 item)
Vital Signs: Correct Procedure for Measuring Blood Pressure (Nursing Skill, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 27)
Therapeutic Procedures (2 items)
Intravenous Therapy: Infiltration (Nursing Skill, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 49)
Urinary Elimination: Preparing to Insert an Indwelling Urinary Catheter (Nursing Skill, RM Fundamentals 7.0 Chp 44)

Please see page 4 for an explanation of the Scores and Topics to Review sections Page 2 of 4

Report Created on: 9/7/2019 12:06 PM EDT REP_COMP_3_0_IndividualProctored_3_0


Outcomes
No of Individual
Thinking Skills Items Score Description
&OLQLFDO-XGJPHQW&ULWLFDO7KLQNLQJ31 29 75.9% Ability to use critical thinking skills (interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference,
and explanation) to make a clinical judgment regarding a posed clinical problem.
Includes cognitive abilities of application and analysis.
Foundational Thinking in Nursing PN 2011 31 71.0% Ability to recall and comprehend information and concepts foundational to quality
nursing practice.

No of Individual
Priority Setting Items Score Description
10 60.0% Ability to demonstrate nursing judgment in making decisions about priority
responses to a client problem. Also includes establishing priorities regarding the
sequence of care to be provided to multiple clients.

No of Individual
Nursing Process Items Score Description
Data Collection (PN 2011) 11 63.6% Ability to apply nursing knowledge to the systematic collection of data about the
client¶s present health status in order to identify the client¶s needs and to identify
appropriate assessments to be performed based on client findings. Also includes
ability to ask the client appropriate questions, listen carefully to the client¶s
responses, and respond appropriately. Nurses must continuously use appropriate
methods to safely collect comprehensive client data.
Planning (PN 2011) 6 83.3% Ability to participate in the development of an appropriate plan of care for clients
with specific health alterations or needs for health promotion/maintenance.
Includes the ability to contribute to the establishment of priorities and desired
outcomes of care that can be readily measured and evaluated.
Implementation/Therapeutic Nursing 32 78.1% Ability to use clinical judgment and critical thinking to select and implement
Intervention (PN 2011) appropriate therapeutic interventions based on nursing knowledge, priorities of
care, and planned goals or outcomes in order to promote, maintain, or restore a
client¶s health. Also Includes the ability to appropriately respond to an unplanned
event (e.g., observation of unsafe practice, change in client status) and to
routinely take measures to minimize a client¶s risk.
Evaluation (PN 2011) 11 63.6% Ability to evaluate a client¶s response to nursing interventions and to reach a
nursing judgment regarding the extent to which goals and outcomes have been
met. Also includes the ability to assess client/staff understanding of instruction,
the effectiveness of intervention, and the recognition of a need for further
intervention.

No of Individual
Clinical Topics Items Score Description
Nutrition PN 2011 6 50.0% Ability to apply nursing knowledge to normal nutrition and diet therapy. Topics
include the collection of data regarding nutritional status; implementation of
actions to promote normal nutrition or dietary modification in response to illness;
and evaluation of the client¶s response to diet therapy.

Please see page 4 for an explanation of the Scores and Topics to Review sections Page 3 of 4

Report Created on: 9/7/2019 12:06 PM EDT REP_COMP_3_0_IndividualProctored_3_0


Score Explanation and Interpretation
Individual Performance Profile

Adjusted Individual Total Score: The adjusted individ- Level 1 - Scores meeting the Proficiency Level 1 standard
ual total score is a function of the number of questions answered may be considered to meet the absolute minimum expectations
correctly divided by the number of scored questions on the as- for performance in this content area. Scores at this level were
sessment. This percentage-correct score is then adjusted to judged by the content expert panel to indicate a student as likely
account for differences in the difficulty of the form taken, produc- to just meet NCLEX-PN® standards in this content area. ATI
ing the adjusted individual total score. For example: advises these students to develop and complete a rigorous plan
of focused review in order to achieve a firmer grasp of this con-
tent.
Number of questions answered correctly =
Total number of scored questions on the assessment Below Level 1 - Scores below the Proficiency Level 1 stand-
ard can be considered below minimum expectations and may be
50 Adjustment indicative of significant risk in this content area. ATI strongly
= 83.3% advises these students to develop and complete an intensive
60 (for form) = Adjusted Individual
plan for focused review and remediation, including the use of
difficulty Total Score ATI materials, textbooks, class notes, reference materials, and
assistance from nurse educators.

Pretest Items: There are 5 unscored pretest questions Topics to Review : Based on the questions missed on this
throughout the assessment, and 60 scored questions. The pre- assessment, a listing of content areas and topics to review is
test questions are used for research purposes. provided. A variety of learning resources may be used in the
review process, including content, images, animations and vide-
os in select components of ATI’s Content Mastery Series® Re-
Criterion-Referenced ATI Proficiency Levels: view Modules, and online practice assessments. Tutorials such
as NurseLogic, Pharmacology Made Easy and Dosage and Cal-
These classifications were developed as the result of a na- culations are additional resources available through ATI.
tional standard setting study conducted by ATI, involving
nurse educator content experts from across the U.S. Norm-Referenced Measures: Means and percentile
ranks can be useful for comparing performance to other nursing
students, both nationally and within the same PN program type.
Level 3 - Scores meeting the Proficiency Level 3 standard They are reviewed annually, and may be periodically reset as
may be considered to exceed most expectations for perfor- more students take the assessments.
mance in this content area. Scores at this level were judged by
the content expert panel to indicate a student as likely to exceed Mean - National: The national mean is the average of the
NCLEX-PN® standards in this content area. ATI advises these individual scores of all PN test takers (within a specified sample
students to engage in continuous focused review to maintain from the ATI data pool) for this assessment.
and improve their knowledge of this content.

Percentile Rank - National: The national percentile rank


Level 2 - Scores meeting the Proficiency Level 2 standard refers to the proportion of test takers from PN nursing programs
may be considered to exceed minimum expectations for perfor- (within a specified sample from the ATI data pool) whose scores
mance in this content area. Scores at this level were judged by are the same as or lower than your individual score.
the content expert panel to indicate a student as fairly certain to
meet NCLEX-PN® standards in this content area. ATI advises
these students to engage in continuous focused review in order NA: Data not available
to improve their knowledge of this content.

EX_PN_CMS_Fund_NCC_Manage_Indv_2011 REV 20110922

S-ar putea să vă placă și