HSDPA Optimization Report - Ericsson

CAMGSM 3G Radio Network Optimization Report
(Phnom Penh City)
Author: Alcatel Mobile Communications Group

Date: 7-Feb-2007
Ref: CAMGSM –3G Cambodia Optimization

Edition: 2.0
ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Mobile Communications Group CAMGSM 3G Opti Rev2.0(Final) Simon Wong Feb-07 2.0 1/96
All rights reserved. Passing on and copying of this document, use and communication of its contents not permitted without written authorization.
Contents
CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................2
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................5
1.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................7
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK .......................................................................................................................8
2.1 SETUP AND DRIVE-ROUTE DEFINITION ............................................................................8
2.1.1 Analysis regions ............................................................................................................8
2.1.2 Drive Route Definition ...................................................................................................9
2.1.3 Equipment Used............................................................................................................9
2.2 DATA COLLECTION.............................................................................................................10
2.2.1 Tests Mode .................................................................................................................10
2.2.2 Scanner Data Collection .............................................................................................10
2.2.3 Voice Data Collection..................................................................................................10
3.0 DRIVE TEST RESULTS & ANALYSIS : VIP CLUSTER ...........................................................11
3.1 Voice & Scan Summary: VIP Cluster .............................................................................11
3.2 Voice Calls Summary: VIP Cluster.................................................................................12
3.3 Scanner Analysis : VIP Cluster ......................................................................................14
3.3.1 Best EcNo Scan Plot..................................................................................................14
3.3.2 Best RSCP Scan Plot..................................................................................................14
3.3.3 Best SC Scan Plot.......................................................................................................15
3.3.4 Pilot Pollution Plot .......................................................................................................15
3.3.5 Pilot Pollution Analysis...............................................................................................16
3.3.6 Scan EcNo Analysis....................................................................................................16
3.3.7 Scan RSCP Analysis ..................................................................................................16
3.4 Short call UE Analysis : VIP Cluster...............................................................................17
3.4.1 UE EcNo distribution with CAF & CAD Plot................................................................17
3.4.2 UE RSCP distribution with CAF & CAD Plot...............................................................17
3.5 Neighbor Analysis : VIP Cluster .....................................................................................18
3.5.1 Neighbors Analysis Plots ............................................................................................18
3.5.2 Neighbors Additions ....................................................................................................18
4.0 DRIVE TEST RESULTS & ANALYSIS : DENSE URBAN CLUSTER ......................................19
4.1 Voice & Scan Summary: DENSE URBAN Cluster.........................................................19
4.2 Voice Calls Summary: DENSE URBAN Cluster ............................................................20
4.3 Scanner Analysis : DENSE URBAN Cluster ..................................................................22
4.3.3 Best SC Scan Plot.......................................................................................................24
4.4 Short call UE Analysis : DENSE URBAN Cluster ..........................................................27
4.5 Neighbor Analysis : DENSE URBAN Cluster.................................................................29
5.0 DRIVE TEST RESULTS & ANALYSIS : URBAN CLUSTER ....................................................31
5.1 Voice & Scan Summary: URBAN Cluster ......................................................................31
5.2 Voice Calls Summary: URBAN Cluster..........................................................................32
5.3 Scanner Analysis : URBAN Cluster ...............................................................................34

All rights reserved. Passing on and copying of this document, use and communication of its contents not permitted without written authorisation.
5.3.3 Best SC Scan Plot.......................................................................................................36
5.4 Short call UE Analysis : URBAN Cluster........................................................................39
5.5 Neighbor Analysis : URBAN Cluster ..............................................................................41
6.0 DRIVE TEST RESULTS & ANALYSIS : SUBURBAN CLUSTER ............................................43
6.1 Voice & Scan Summary: SUBURBAN Cluster...............................................................43
6.2 Voice Calls Summary: SUBURBAN Cluster ..................................................................44
6.3 Scanner Analysis : SUBURBAN Cluster ........................................................................46
6.3.3 Best SC Scan Plot.......................................................................................................47
6.4 Short call UE Analysis : SUBURBAN Cluster ................................................................49
6.5 Neighbor Analysis : SUBURBAN Cluster.......................................................................50
7.0 DRIVE TEST RESULTS & ANALYSIS : OVERALL..................................................................52
7.1 Voice & Scan Summary: Overall....................................................................................52
7.2 Voice Calls Summary: Overall .......................................................................................53
7.3 Scanner Analysis : Overall .............................................................................................55
7.3.3 Best SC Scan Plot.......................................................................................................57
7.4 Short call UE Analysis : Overall .....................................................................................58
7.4.3 UE TxPower distribution Plot ......................................................................................60
7.4.4 UE Active Set Size distribution Plot ............................................................................61
7.4.5 Short calls Call Failure analysis ..................................................................................62
7.4.6 Short calls Call Drop analysis .....................................................................................65
8.0 FINAL DRIVE ANALYSIS RESULTS.........................................................................................68
8.1 Final Drive Voice & Scan Summary: Overall..................................................................68
8.2 Final Drive Voice Calls Summary: Overall .....................................................................69
8.3 Final Drive Scanner Analysis : Overall...........................................................................71
8.3.1 Final Drive Best EcNo Scan Plot ...............................................................................71
8.3.2 Final Drive Best RSCP Scan Plot ...............................................................................72
8.3.3 Final Drive Best SC Scan Plot ....................................................................................73
8.4 Final Drive Short call UE Analysis : Overall ...................................................................74
8.4.1 Final Drive UE EcNo distribution with CAF & CAD Plot..............................................74
8.4.2 Final Drive UE RSCP distribution with CAF & CAD Plot ............................................75
8.4.3 Final Drive UE TxPower distribution Plot ....................................................................76
8.4.4 Final Drive UE Active Set Size distribution Plot..........................................................77
8.4.5 Final Drive Short calls Call Failure analysis................................................................78

8.4.6 Final Drive Short calls Call Drop analysis ...................................................................78
9.0 INITIAL DRIVE & FINAL DRIVE OPTIMIZATION COMPARISONS. ........................................79
9.1 UE & Scan Summary Comparison.................................................................................81
9.1.1 Initial Drive UE & Scanner statistics............................................................................81
9.1.2 Final Drive UE & Scanner statistics ............................................................................81
9.1.3 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner EcNo Plots Comparison.......................................82
9.1.4 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner RSCP Plots Comparison......................................83
9.1.5 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner Best SC Plots Comparison ..................................84
9.1.6 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner Comparison Summary .........................................85
9.2 Voice Calls & PS Calls Summary Comparison ..............................................................88
9.2.1 Initial Drive Voice Calls Statistic..................................................................................88
9.2.2 Final Drive Voice Calls Statistic ..................................................................................88
9.2.3 Initial Drive & Final Drive CS Calls Summary .............................................................89
10.0 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................90
11.0 APPENDIXES .............................................................................................................................91
11.1 CAMGSM-3G Default Parameters .................................................................................91
11.2 Cluster Analysis: Unsynchronized NodeB Case Study..................................................92

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Various Cluster analysis region ............................................................................................... 8
Figure 2 Drive Route Definition .............................................................................................................. 9
Figure 3 Equipment list .......................................................................................................................... 9
Figure 4 Drive Test Setup Configurations............................................................................................ 10
Figure 5 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - VIP Cluster .................................... 11
Figure 6 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - VIP Cluster.................................. 11
Figure 7 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – VIP Cluster................................ 11
Figure 8 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – VIP Cluster ........................................................... 12
Figure 9 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – VIP Cluster............................................................ 13
Figure 10 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – VIP Cluster ........................................................................... 14
Figure 11 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – VIP Cluster .......................................................................... 14
Figure 12 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – VIP Cluster ...................................................................... 15
Figure 13 Initial Drive Pilot Pollution Plot – VIP Cluster....................................................................... 15
Figure 14 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – VIP Cluster ............................... 17
Figure 15 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – VIP Cluster .............................. 17
Figure 16 Initial Drive Neighbors Analysis Plot – VIP Cluster.............................................................. 18
Figure 17 Initial Drive Neighbors Additions – VIP Cluster ................................................................... 18
Figure 18 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - DENSE URBAN Cluster .............. 19
Figure 19 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - DENSE URBAN Cluster ........... 19
Figure 20 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster ......... 19
Figure 21 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – DENSE URBAN Cluster..................................... 20
Figure 22 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – DENSE URBAN Cluster ..................................... 21
Figure 23 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster ....................................................... 22
Figure 24 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster ...................................................... 23
Figure 25 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster.................................................. 24
Figure 26 Initial Drive Pilot Pollution Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster .................................................. 25
Figure 27 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster........... 27
Figure 28 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster.......... 28
Figure 29 Initial Drive Neighbors Analysis Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster ......................................... 29
Figure 30 Initial Drive Neighbors Additions – DENSE URBAN Cluster ............................................... 30
Figure 31 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - URBAN Cluster............................ 31
Figure 32 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - URBAN Cluster......................... 31
Figure 33 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – URBAN Cluster ....................... 31
Figure 34 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – URBAN Cluster .................................................. 32
Figure 35 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – URBAN Cluster................................................... 33
Figure 36 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – URBAN Cluster..................................................................... 34
Figure 37 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – URBAN Cluster ................................................................... 35
Figure 38 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – URBAN Cluster ............................................................... 36
Figure 39 Initial Drive Pilot Pollution Plot – URBAN Cluster................................................................ 37
Figure 40 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – URBAN Cluster ........................ 39
Figure 41 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – URBAN Cluster ....................... 40
Figure 42 Initial Drive Neighbors Analysis Plot – URBAN Cluster....................................................... 41
Figure 43 Initial Drive Neighbors Additions – URBAN Cluster............................................................. 42
Figure 44 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - SUBURBAN Cluster .................... 43
Figure 45 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - SUBURBAN Cluster ................. 43
Figure 46 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – SUBURBAN Cluster ............... 43
Figure 47 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – SUBURBAN Cluster........................................... 44
Figure 48 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – SUBURBAN Cluster ........................................... 45
Figure 49 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster ............................................................. 46
Figure 50 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster ............................................................ 46
Figure 51 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster........................................................ 47
Figure 52 Initial Drive Pilot Pollution Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster ........................................................ 47
Figure 53 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – SUBURBAN Cluster................. 49
Figure 54 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – SUBURBAN Cluster................ 49
Figure 55 Initial Drive Neighbors Analysis Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster ............................................... 50
Figure 56 Initial Drive Neighbors Additions – URBAN Cluster............................................................. 51
Figure 57 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - Overall ......................................... 52

Figure 58 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - Overall ...................................... 52
Figure 59 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – Overall..................................... 52
Figure 60 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – Overall ................................................................ 53
Figure 61 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – Overall ................................................................ 54
Figure 62 Initial Drive Voice Calls Properties – Overall ....................................................................... 54
Figure 63 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – Overall .................................................................................. 55
Figure 64 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – Overall ................................................................................. 56
Figure 65 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – Overall............................................................................. 57
Figure 66 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – Overall ...................................... 58
Figure 67 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – Overall..................................... 59
Figure 68 Initial Drive UE Tx Power Distribution plot – Overall ........................................................... 60
Figure 69 Initial Drive UE Active Set Size Distribution plot – Overall .................................................. 61
Figure 70 Final Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - Overall.......................................... 68
Figure 71 Finall Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - Overall ...................................... 68
Figure 72 Final Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – Overall ..................................... 68
Figure 73 Final Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – Overall................................................................. 69
Figure 74 Final Drive Voice Calls Classifications – Overall ................................................................. 70
Figure 75 Final Drive Voice Calls Properties – Overall........................................................................ 70
Figure 76 Final Drive Best EcNo Plot – Overall ................................................................................... 71
Figure 77 Final Drive Best RSCP Plot – Overall.................................................................................. 72
Figure 78 Final Drive Best SC Scan Plot – Overall ............................................................................. 73
Figure 79 Final Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – Overall....................................... 74
Figure 80 Final Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – Overall ..................................... 75
Figure 81 Final Drive UE Tx Power Distribution plot – Overall ............................................................ 76
Figure 82 Final Drive UE Active Set Size Distribution plot – Overall ................................................... 77
Figure 83 Antenna Change Request Implementation updates............................................................ 79
Figure 84 Neighbors Analysis Implementation updates ...................................................................... 80
Figure 85 Initial Drive UE & Scanner statistics .................................................................................... 81
Figure 86 Initial Drive Scanner average statistics................................................................................ 81
Figure 87 Final Drive UE & Scanner statistics ..................................................................................... 81
Figure 88 Final Drive Scanner average statistics ................................................................................ 81
Figure 89 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner EcNo Plots Comparison ............................................... 82
Figure 90 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner RSCP Plots Comparison .............................................. 83
Figure 91 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner Best SC Plots Comparison ........................................... 84
Figure 92 Scanner average RSCP Comparison .................................................................................. 85
Figure 93 Scanner average EcNo Comparison ................................................................................... 85
Figure 94 Scanner RSCP Aggregate Comparison .............................................................................. 86
Figure 95 Scanner EcNo Aggregate Comparison ............................................................................... 86
Figure 96 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best Server Plot. .................................................. 87
Figure 97 Final Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best Server Plot.................................................... 87
Figure 98 Initial Drive Voice Calls Statistic .......................................................................................... 88
Figure 99 Final Drive Voice Calls Statistic ........................................................................................... 88
Figure 100 Initial Drive & Final Drive Voice Calls Statistic Summary .................................................. 89

1.0 Introduction
Alcatel has delivered & implemented a 3G UMTS network for CAMGSM 3G in Phnom Penh
Cambodia. An overall network optimization with defined drive routes has been performed to
fine tune the network performance.
The main purpose of this activity is to provide CAMGSM 3G an optimization process & report
upon analyzing several drive test data to achieve an improvement in the overall network
quality. Several key performance indicator has been identified and will be used as a platform
of comparison between the performance before the after the optimization process.

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
2.1 SETUP AND DRIVE-ROUTE DEFINITION
2.1.1 Analysis regions
Rural
VIP Suburban
Dense Urban
Urban
Suburban
Rural
Rural
Figure 1 Various Cluster analysis region

2.1.2 Drive Route Definition
The necessary drive routes are highlighted in BLUE as shown in the following diagram.
GPS G
Figure 2 Drive Route Definition
2.1.3 Equipment Used

Test Software Handset Hardware
Anritsu ML8720B
Pilot N/A N/A v2 W-CDMA
Scanner.
Nemo Outdoor Nokia 6650 &

Voice Laptop PC,GPS
Data collection. Nokia 6630.
Figure 3 Equipment list

2.2 DATA COLLECTION
2.2.1 Tests Mode
Service Operator Call Originator Call Type
- -
Pilot Mobitel (3G)
3g to MSC test
CS Voice Mobitel (3G) Mobile Originating
number
Figure 4 Drive Test Setup Configurations
CS long calls were also performed, event based analysis will be done for these calls.
Concentration will be given to Pilot & CS Short calls.
2.2.2 Scanner Data Collection
The scanner was used to collect the following data & set to scan only Mobitel frequency
(10775):
• GPS Location
• Scrambling code
• Pilot RSCP
• Pilot Ec/No
2.2.3 Voice Data Collection

A script was setup in Nemo and used to repeat the following call sequence:
• Mobile originating calls.

• Call duration of 60 seconds.
• Calls to standard CAMGSM engineering test number “816”.
• 10 second pause after call clear down.
• Repeat.

3.0 Drive test results & analysis : VIP Cluster
3.1 Voice & Scan Summary: VIP Cluster

The UE & Scan log files are analysed based on VIP cluster, shown as below,
Ec Statistics Handset Scanner

Ec >= -79 62.98% 74.78%
Ec >= -82 77.92% 89.06%
Ec >= -87 91.90% 98.54%
Ec >= -92 95.31% 99.91%
Ec >= -97 96.33% 100.00%
Ec >= -120 100.00% 100.00%
Ec < -120 0.00% 0.00%
Figure 5 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - VIP Cluster
Ec/Io Statistics Handset Scanner

Ec/Io >= -9 99.76% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -12 100.00% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -16 100.00% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -20 100.00% 100.00%
Ec/Io < -20 0.00% 0.00%
Figure 6 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - VIP Cluster
Figure 7 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – VIP Cluster

3.2 Voice Calls Summary: VIP Cluster
Call Statistics L3 Value Rate

Total Call Attempts 89
On WCDMA 89 100.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Blocked Calls

On WCDMA 0 0.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Calls Setup Successfully 88 98.88%

On WCDMA 88 98.88%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Calls Dropped 1 1.14%

On WCDMA 1 1.14%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Calls Completed Successfully 87 97.75%

On WCDMA 87
97.75%
Set up on WCDMA and HO to GSM 0
On GSM 0 0.00%
Classification Count
WCDMA Call Attempt 89
GSM Call Attempt 0
WCDMA Blocked Call 0
GSM Blocked Call 0
WCDMA Call Setup Failure 1
GSM Call Setup Failure 0
WCDMA Call Drop 1
GSM Call Drop 0
WCDMA to GSM Call Drop 0
WCDMA Network Drop 0
WCDMA Bad Release 0
WCDMA OK 87
WCDMA to GSM OK 0
GSM OK 0
IRAT Handover 0
Figure 8 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – VIP Cluster

Call Classifications
WCDMA Blocked Calls GSM Blocked Calls WCDMA Setup Failure

GSM Setup Failure WCDMA Dropped Call GSM Dropped Call
WCDMA OK Call WCDMA to GSM OK Call GSM OK Call
Figure 9 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – VIP Cluster

3.3 Scanner Analysis : VIP Cluster
3.3.1 Best EcNo Scan Plot
Figure 10 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – VIP Cluster
3.3.2 Best RSCP Scan Plot
RSCP1
Figure 11 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – VIP Cluster

3.3.3 Best SC Scan Plot
Figure 12 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – VIP Cluster
3.3.4 Pilot Pollution Plot
Figure 13 Initial Drive Pilot Pollution Plot – VIP Cluster

3.3.5 Pilot Pollution Analysis
Analysis is concentrated on those area that the Best server’s RSCP > -95dBm, Ec/No < -10dB, and the 4th Ec/No value is within 6dB below the best serving
cell.
Drive test Serving Effect/Probable Cause Comment Group Proposed Action

count Event ID cell
Overshooting cell of RiverStar3 causing Downtilt RiverStar3 from EDT4-> EDT6 to
VIP_200701_01 PP1 RiverStar3 RF
fluctuating of EcNo & pilot pullution at this area. avoid overshooting at this area.
Overshooting cell of Orussey1 causing Downtilt Orrusey1 additional EDT2 deg from
VIP_200701_01 PP2 Orussey1 RF
fluctuating of EcNo & pilot pullution at this area. existing tilt to avoid overshooting at this area.
Overshooting cell of Bactuk1 causing fluctuating Downtilt Bactuk1 additional EDT2 deg from
VIP_200701_01 PP3 Bactuk1 RF
of EcNo & pilot pullution at this area. existing tilt to avoid overshooting at this area.
3.3.6 Scan EcNo Analysis

count Event ID cell
NA NA NA NA NA NA
* No significant problem/poor EcNo observed on scanner EcNo plot.
3.3.7 Scan RSCP Analysis

count Event ID cell
Poor RSCP due to main beam of Toulkok43 not
Propose to change Toulkok43 azimuth from
directed towards this part of the road, poor
VIP_200701_01 RSCP1 Toulkok43 RF 240 -> 210 to improve dominance at this
dominance by Toulkok43, dominated by
area.
Toulkok2 instead.

3.4 Short call UE Analysis : VIP Cluster
3.4.1 UE EcNo distribution with CAF & CAD Plot
Figure 14 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – VIP Cluster
3.4.2 UE RSCP distribution with CAF & CAD Plot
Figure 15 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – VIP Cluster

3.5 Neighbor Analysis : VIP Cluster
3.5.1 Neighbors Analysis Plots
Figure 16 Initial Drive Neighbors Analysis Plot – VIP Cluster
3.5.2 Neighbors Additions

Source Neighbour
Source Cell Source Scrambling Neighbour Cell Neighbour Cell Neighbour Cell Neighbours
Source Cell Name ID Code ID Name UMTS ID Scrambling Code ID Relations
CTN3 129 39 ToulKok41 220 130 3G<>3G
FarmerBank1 223 133 Techno1 121 31 3G<>3G
FarmerBank1 223 133 BayonHtl3 168 78 3G<>3G
Figure 17 Initial Drive Neighbors Additions – VIP Cluster

4.0 Drive test results & analysis : DENSE URBAN Cluster
4.1 Voice & Scan Summary: DENSE URBAN Cluster

The UE & Scan log files are analysed based on DENSE URBAN cluster, shown as below,

Ec >= -79 83.82% 93.66%
Ec >= -82 91.58% 97.76%
Ec >= -87 95.56% 99.50%
Ec >= -92 96.97% 99.85%
Ec >= -97 98.42% 100.00%
Ec >= -120 100.00% 100.00%
Ec < -120 0.00% 0.00%
Figure 18 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - DENSE URBAN Cluster

Ec/Io >= -9 97.92% 99.87%
Ec/Io >= -12 99.64% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -16 99.90% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -20 99.96% 100.00%
Ec/Io < -20 0.04% 0.00%
Figure 19 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - DENSE URBAN Cluster
Figure 20 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster

4.2 Voice Calls Summary: DENSE URBAN Cluster

On WCDMA 213 100.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Blocked Calls

On WCDMA 0 0.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 208 97.65%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 3 1.44%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 204
95.77%
On GSM 0 0.00%
GSM Call Attempt 0
GSM Blocked Call 0
WCDMA Call Drop 3
GSM Call Drop 0
WCDMA Bad Release 1
WCDMA OK 204
WCDMA to GSM OK 0
GSM OK 0
IRAT Handover 0
Figure 21 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – DENSE URBAN Cluster


Figure 22 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – DENSE URBAN Cluster

4.3 Scanner Analysis : DENSE URBAN Cluster
Figure 23 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster

RSCP1
Figure 24 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster

Figure 25 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster

Figure 26 Initial Drive Pilot Pollution Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster

cell.

count Event ID cell
Overshooting cell of RiverStar3 causing Downtilt RiverStar3 from EDT4-> EDT6 to
DU_200701_01 PP1 RiverStar3 RF
fluctuating of EcNo & pilot pullution at this area. avoid overshooting at this area.

count Event ID cell
NA NA NA NA NA NA

count Event ID cell
NA NA NA NA NA NA
* No significant problem/poor coverage observed on scanner RSCP plot.

4.4 Short call UE Analysis : DENSE URBAN Cluster
Figure 27 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – DENSE URBAN
Cluster

Figure 28 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – DENSE URBAN
Cluster

4.5 Neighbor Analysis : DENSE URBAN Cluster
Figure 29 Initial Drive Neighbors Analysis Plot – DENSE URBAN Cluster

Source Neighbour
CntMarket2 134 44 Saravoan2 185 95 3G<>3G
CntMarket2 134 44 RedCross2 104 14 3G<>3G
CntMarket2 134 44 PsarSilep1 136 46 3G<>3G
CntMarket3 135 45 Orussey1 106 16 3G<>3G
CntMarket3 135 45 Orussey2 107 17 3G<>3G
CntMarket3 135 45 RedCross3 105 15 3G<>3G
GoldenCity2 194 104 PPMedical3 201 111 3G<>3G
PsarSilep1 136 46 RiverStar3 204 114 3G<>3G
RPalaceFcc3 141 51 CntMarket2 134 44 3G<>3G
RPalaceFcc3 141 51 Saravoan1 184 94 3G<>3G
Saravoan2 185 95 CntMarket2 134 44 3G<>3G
Sonex1 130 40 RedCross2 104 14 3G<>3G
Figure 30 Initial Drive Neighbors Additions – DENSE URBAN Cluster

5.0 Drive test results & analysis : URBAN Cluster
5.1 Voice & Scan Summary: URBAN Cluster

The UE & Scan log files are analysed based on URBAN cluster, shown as below,

Ec >= -79 70.48% 82.73%
Ec >= -82 81.79% 91.49%
Ec >= -87 92.53% 98.97%
Ec >= -92 95.92% 99.94%
Ec >= -97 97.80% 100.00%
Ec >= -120 100.00% 100.00%
Ec < -120 0.00% 0.00%
Figure 31 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - URBAN Cluster

Ec/Io >= -9 97.81% 99.96%
Ec/Io >= -12 99.54% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -16 99.83% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -20 99.98% 100.00%
Ec/Io < -20 0.02% 0.00%
Figure 32 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - URBAN Cluster
Figure 33 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – URBAN Cluster

5.2 Voice Calls Summary: URBAN Cluster

On WCDMA 153 100.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Blocked Calls

On WCDMA 0 0.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 146 95.42%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 4 2.74%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 142
92.81%
On GSM 0 0.00%
GSM Call Attempt 0
GSM Blocked Call 0
WCDMA Call Drop 4
GSM Call Drop 0
WCDMA Bad Release 0
WCDMA OK 142
WCDMA to GSM OK 0
GSM OK 0
IRAT Handover 0
Figure 34 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – URBAN Cluster


Figure 35 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – URBAN Cluster

5.3 Scanner Analysis : URBAN Cluster
Figure 36 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – URBAN Cluster

RSCP1
Figure 37 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – URBAN Cluster

Figure 38 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – URBAN Cluster

Figure 39 Initial Drive Pilot Pollution Plot – URBAN Cluster

cell.

count Event ID cell
Overshooting cell of University2 causing Downtilt University2 additional EDT2 deg from
UR_200701_01 PP1 University2 RF
Overshooting cell of Nanjing3 causing Downtilt Nanjing3 additional EDT2 deg from
UR_200701_01 PP2 Nanjing3 RF
Overshooting cell of Bactuk3 causing fluctuating Downtilt Bactuk3 additional EDT2 deg from
UR_200701_01 PP3 Bactuk3 RF
of EcNo & pilot pullution at this area. existing tilt to avoid overshooting at this area.

count Event ID cell
NA NA NA NA NA NA

Drive test Effect/Probable Cause Comment Group Proposed Action
count Event ID Serving cell
Poor RSCP due to main beam of TeukLaork31
Propose to change TeukLaork31 azimuth
not directed towards this area, poor dominance
UR_200701_01 RSCP1 TeukLaork31 RF from 10 -> 30 & uptilt 2 deg from existing tilit
by TeukLaork31, dominated by University2
to improve dominance at this area.
instead.

5.4 Short call UE Analysis : URBAN Cluster
Figure 40 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – URBAN Cluster

Figure 41 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – URBAN Cluster

5.5 Neighbor Analysis : URBAN Cluster
Figure 42 Initial Drive Neighbors Analysis Plot – URBAN Cluster

Source Neighbour
Bactuk1 187 97 Nanjing2 143 53 3G<>3G
Bactuk3 189 99 Santhormok2 173 83 3G<>3G
Bactuk3 189 99 Santhormok3 174 84 3G<>3G
FarmerBank1 223 133 Sangke1 205 115 3G<>3G
FarmerBank2 224 134 Nanjing2 143 53 3G<>3G
FarmerBank3 225 135 Bactuk3 189 99 3G<>3G
FarmerBank3 225 135 Nanjing3 144 54 3G<>3G
Olympic2 179 89 Bactuk2 188 98 3G<>3G
Sangke2 206 116 Bactuk2 188 98 3G<>3G
Santhormok3 174 84 Techno2 122 32 3G<>3G
Teuklaork32 212 122 FarmerBank3 225 135 3G<>3G
Figure 43 Initial Drive Neighbors Additions – URBAN Cluster

6.0 Drive test results & analysis : SUBURBAN Cluster
6.1 Voice & Scan Summary: SUBURBAN Cluster

The UE & Scan log files are analysed based on SUBURBAN cluster, shown as below,

Ec >= -79 58.09% 70.96%
Ec >= -82 72.17% 86.06%
Ec >= -87 89.05% 97.76%
Ec >= -92 94.51% 99.94%
Ec >= -97 96.00% 100.00%
Ec >= -120 100.00% 100.00%
Ec < -120 0.00% 0.00%
Figure 44 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - SUBURBAN Cluster

Ec/Io >= -9 97.45% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -12 99.00% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -16 99.84% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -20 99.94% 100.00%
Ec/Io < -20 0.06% 0.00%
Figure 45 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - SUBURBAN Cluster
Figure 46 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – SUBURBAN Cluster

6.2 Voice Calls Summary: SUBURBAN Cluster

On WCDMA 82 100.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Blocked Calls

On WCDMA 0 0.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 80 97.56%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 0 0.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 80
97.56%
On GSM 0 0.00%
GSM Call Attempt 0
GSM Blocked Call 0
WCDMA Call Drop 0
GSM Call Drop 0
WCDMA Bad Release 0
WCDMA OK 80
WCDMA to GSM OK 0
GSM OK 0
IRAT Handover 0
Figure 47 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – SUBURBAN Cluster


Figure 48 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – SUBURBAN Cluster

6.3 Scanner Analysis : SUBURBAN Cluster
Figure 49 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster
RSCP1
Figure 50 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster

Figure 51 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster
Figure 52 Initial Drive Pilot Pollution Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster

cell.

Overshooting cell of Orussey1 causing Downtilt Orrusey1 additional EDT2 deg from
SU_200701_01 PP1 Orussey1 RF
Overshooting cell of Bactuk1 causing Downtilt Bactuk1 additional EDT2 deg from
SU_200701_01 PP2 Bactuk1 RF
Downtilt Santhormak1 additional EDT2 deg
Overshooting cell of Santhormok1 causing
SU_200701_01 PP3 Santhormok1 RF from existing tilt to avoid overshooting at this
fluctuating of EcNo & pilot pullution at this area.
area.

count Event ID cell
NA NA NA NA NA NA

Poor RSCP due to main beam of TeukLaork31
Propose to change TeukLaork31 azimuth
not directed towards this area, poor dominance
SU_200701_01 RSCP1 TeukLaork31 RF from 10 -> 30 & uptilt 2 deg from existing tilit
by TeukLaork31, dominated by University2
to improve dominance at this area.
instead.

6.4 Short call UE Analysis : SUBURBAN Cluster
Figure 53 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – SUBURBAN Cluster
Figure 54 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – SUBURBAN Cluster

6.5 Neighbor Analysis : SUBURBAN Cluster
Figure 55 Initial Drive Neighbors Analysis Plot – SUBURBAN Cluster

Source Neighbour
BayonHtl1 166 76 RiverStar1 202 112 3G<>3G
BayonHtl2 167 77 CTN2 128 38 3G<>3G
Nanjing3 144 54 University2 170 80 3G<>3G
RiverStar1 202 112 CTN2 128 38 3G<>3G
Santhormok3 174 84 Bactuk1 187 97 3G<>3G
HighSchool3 198 108 ToulSPrey22 215 125 3G<>3G
Bactuk3 189 99 Nanjing2 143 53 3G<>3G
BayonHtl3 168 78 Santhormok1 172 82 3G<>3G
BayonHtl3 168 78 Bactuk1 187 97 3G<>3G
Techno2 122 32 InterconHtl3 177 87 3G<>3G
CntMarket1 133 43 Nanjing2 143 53 3G<>3G
Figure 56 Initial Drive Neighbors Additions – URBAN Cluster

7.0 Drive test results & analysis : Overall
7.1 Voice & Scan Summary: Overall

The UE & Scan log files are analysed based on overall, shown as below,

Ec >= -79 69.55% 81.02%
Ec >= -82 80.72% 90.66%
Ec >= -87 91.52% 98.15%
Ec >= -92 95.44% 99.84%
Ec >= -97 97.34% 100.00%
Ec >= -120 100.00% 100.00%
Ec < -120 0.00% 0.00%
Figure 57 Initial Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - Overall

Ec/Io >= -9 97.88% 99.95%
Ec/Io >= -12 99.53% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -16 99.91% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -20 99.98% 100.00%
Ec/Io < -20 0.02% 0.00%
Figure 58 Initial Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - Overall
Figure 59 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – Overall

7.2 Voice Calls Summary: Overall

On WCDMA 673 100.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Blocked Calls

On WCDMA 0 0.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 657 97.62%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 9 1.37%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 645
95.84%
On GSM 0 0.00%
GSM Call Attempt 0
GSM Blocked Call 0
WCDMA Call Drop 9
GSM Call Drop 0
WCDMA Bad Release 3
WCDMA OK 645
WCDMA to GSM OK 0
GSM OK 0
IRAT Handover 0
Figure 60 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – Overall


Figure 61 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – Overall
Analysis Name Calculated Value

Call Setup Time ConAck 4.57
Call Setup Time Con 4.57
Time on 3G to ISHO 0
Total Call Time Ending 3G 42453.13
Total Call Time Ending 2G 0
Idle Time on WCDMA 6746
Idle Time on GSM 0
GSM HO Complete 0
GSM HO Failure 0
WCDMA SHO Complete 4683
WCDMA SHO Failure 0
ISHO Attempt From 3G 0
ISHO Failure From 3G 0
ISHO Complete From 2G 0
Figure 62 Initial Drive Voice Calls Properties – Overall

7.3 Scanner Analysis : Overall
Figure 63 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – Overall

Figure 64 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – Overall

Figure 65 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – Overall

7.4 Short call UE Analysis : Overall
Figure 66 Initial Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – Overall
Figure 67 Initial Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – Overall

7.4.3 UE TxPower distribution Plot
Figure 68 Initial Drive UE Tx Power Distribution plot – Overall

7.4.4 UE Active Set Size distribution Plot
Figure 69 Initial Drive UE Active Set Size Distribution plot – Overall

7.4.5 Short calls Call Failure analysis
Event ID Latitude Longitude Time Effect/Probable Cause Comment Group Proposed Action
DL CC Disconnnet right after RB Setup

Complete under good RF condition, Class: Suspect congestion problem within network
CAF1 11.54149 104.925087 13:23:35.381 Resouce Unavailable. Cause: "Resource NET elements/transmission, non RF related
Unavailable, unspecified"; UL Interference = - problem.
102; BLER = 0.0%
105; BLER = 0.0%
Call Setup until CC:Call Proceeding, no RB RB setup incomplete, possible
setup initiated by network, i.e. RB setup transmission resource allocation on Iub/Iu-
CAF3 11.56318 104.898521 15:17:26.731 NET
failure causing CAF; RF condition was good cs problem due to unstable transmission
during entire call setup process, UL int = -105. between RNC/CN.
UE went into idle mode (BCCH) after RB Severe UL interefence causes high BLER
Setup complete, BLER went up to 50% & call & eventually CAF. Suspect other system
setup fail due to High BLER. RF condition is operating the the same frequecies as
CAF4 11.56809 104.893784 15:29:18.715 RF
good during the entire setup process. UL int Mobitel 3G, e.g. broadcasting station etc.
= -86. Excessive UL int observed at this Check for possible inteference source
surrouding area. around this area.
103; BLER = 0.0%

Complete under good RF condition; Call fail Call fail due to time out setting of 10s setup
CAF6 11.5607 104.905243 16:39:07.356 Tool
due to time out setting of 10s setup in DT-tool. in DT-tool. Non RF or network issues.
UL Interference = -105; BLER = 0.0%.

RRC Conn setup completed, CM service
request ignored due to High BLER (100%) Call fail due to High BLER which could be
CAF7 11.55445 104.911148 11:32:52.487 right after CM service request sent. RF NodeB a result of unstable tranmission problem of
condition is good. Cell was camp on to SC89 Olympic. Non RF related issues observed.
(Olympic2)
Call Setup until Call Proceeding, no RB setup
initiated by network, i.e. RB setup failure
RB setup incomplete, possible
causing CAF; RF condition was good during
transmission synchronisation between
CAF8 11.5542 104.913849 12:17:10.017 entire call setup process, UL int = -105. NodeB
RNC & NodeB. Check Olympic for
Observed High BLER after ASU SC89
transmission stability.
(Olympic2). Subsequent CM service req
ignored/failed under the same cell.
106; BLER = 0.0%

CAF10 11.5721 104.920692 16:31:13.585 NET

100; BLER = 0.0%
RRC Conn Setup completed on SC116 Bactuk site is not in sync with surrounding
(Sangke2), CM service request ignored after, site, hence unable to perform SHO to
due to poor EcNo & HiBler. UE unable to SHO surrounding sites, although call setup can
CAF12 11.56229 104.912613 14:23:12.798 to SC98 (Bactuk2) although best detected on NodeB be performed under any of the cell of this
scanner. Further investigation revealed site. Most likely clocking module
Bactuk site was not in sync with surrounding malfunction for Bactuk, change clocking
sites, hence unable to perform any SHO. module of Bactuk NodeB

RRC Conn Setup completed on SC53
(Nanjing2), call setup unsuccessful due to Similar to CAF12. Most likely clocking
CAF13 11.56729 104.917839 14:27:04.323 poor EcNo & HiBler. UE unable to SHO to NodeB module malfunction for Bactuk, change
SC98 (Bactuk2) although best detected on clocking module of Bactuk NodeB
scanner. Similar problem with CAF12.
UE went into idle mode (BCCH) after RB
Setup complete, BLER went up to 50% & call
Similar to CAF12. Most likely clocking
setup fail due to HiBler, after SC97 (Bactuk1)
CAF14 11.56677 104.917122 14:27:28.892 NodeB module malfunction for Bactuk, change
is added to AS. RF condition is good during
clocking module of Bactuk NodeB
the entire setup process. UL int = -104.
Similar problem with CAF12.
106; BLER = 0.0%
CAF16 11.56054 104.910896 15:09:08.234 NET

7.4.6 Short calls Call Drop analysis
Call Setup completed on SC62 (BopharHtl2). Suspect temporary transmission problem

Call procedures were normal, but observed causes intermitent syncronization problem
HiBler (50%) after ASU of SC110 (PP between cells. Verify the same cell on the
CAD1 11.55147 104.934998 13:37:50.193 NET
Medical2) & became best AS. Call drop due to rest of the log files, no such incident
HiBler, RF condition is good during the entire occurred again. Non RF issues. Keep in
call process. observation.
Signal of ToulKok4 fluctuating dratically (both
UE & scanner), especially after turning corner
Suspect instability in NodeB connectivity
of from main road. Unlikely to be RF
with RNC, causing intermittent NodeB
shadowing effect since both UE & scanner
CAD2 11.57847 104.888382 11:12:30.957 NodeB active/inactive. Monitor alarm status of
signal is lost entirely after the corner turning.
Toulkok4 for site stability/ cell availability
Signal re-detected when reaching right
%.
underneath the site, causing sudden drop in
EcNo hence CAD.
Several RRC setup req ignored prior to Call

Setup successful on SC84 (Santhormok3). UE Suspect temporary transmission problem
Tx Power normal (-15~-30) & UL Interference causes intermitent syncronization problem
normal (-105). RF condition was good during between cells. Verify the same cell on the
CAD3 11.56167 104.898705 15:18:33.528 NET
the entire call process. BLER increase to 50% rest of the log files, no such incident
after Call Setup completed, eventually CAD occurred again. Non RF issues. Keep in
due to HiBler. Next call initiated under same observation.
cell was successful & no drop observed.

DL CC Disconnect initiated by network w/o
any failure reason (network release RRC). RF
Condition is good. Several RRC setup req Suspect temporary transmission problem
ignored prior to Call Setup successful on causes intermitent syncronization problem
SC91 (ToulSleng1). UE Tx Power normal (- between cells. Verify the same cell on the
CAD4 11.55497 104.915833 12:18:31.569 NET
10~-30) & UL Interference normal (-101). rest of the log files, no such incident
BLER increase to 50% after Call Setup occurred again. Non RF issues. Keep in
completed, eventually CAD due to HiBler. observation.
Next call initiated under same cell was
successful & no drop observed.
Missing neighbors between SC134

(FarmerBank2) & SC53 (Nanjing2), cell drag Add neighbors FarmerBank2 <> Nanjinh2.
CAD5 11.56777 104.91423 12:30:46.697 on SC134 w/o sending e1a MR to add better RF Proposed in neighbor analysis report
detected cell by scanner SC53, hence EcNo already.
became poor & call drop eventually.
Call Setup completed on SC19 (RoyalGP1).

Call drop eventually when SC19 EcNo
Similar to CAF12. Most likely clocking
degraded. No better cell detected in MonSet,
CAD6 11.56729 104.917938 14:26:51.807 NodeB module malfunction for Bactuk, change
but scanner observed good signal from SC97
clocking module of Bactuk NodeB.
(Bactuk1). UE should detect much better
signal from SC97. Problem similar to CAF12.
Call Setup completed on SC98 (Bactuk2). Call

sustained & drag on this cell w/o e1a MR sent Similar to CAF12. Most likely clocking
CAD7 11.56173 104.916313 14:32:09.386 to add better detected cell SC18 (Orussey3) in NodeB module malfunction for Bactuk, change
MonSet. Scanner also detected better signal clocking module of Bactuk NodeB.
from SC18. Cell drag on SC98 & dropped.
Similar to CAF12. Although SC99
Call Setup completed on SC116 (Sangke2).
(Bactuk3) is added into AS, but EcNo is
Call sustained & drag on this cell with e1a MR
poor compared to scanner, indicating
sent to add better detected cells in MonSet,
CAD8 11.56184 104.912086 14:45:34.605 NodeB synchronization problem with Sangke.
eventually SC99 (Baktuk3) is added into AS,
Most likely clocking module malfunction for
but EcNo is very poor compared to scanner
Bactuk, change clocking module of Bactuk
results. Poor EcNo causes call drop.
NodeB.

Missing neighbors between SC53 (Nanjing2)
& SC134 (FarmerBank2), cell drag on SC53 Add neighbors Nanjing2 <> FarmerBank2.
CAD9 11.56745 104.911697 14:49:27.191 w/o sending e1a MR to add better detected RF Proposed in neighbor analysis report
cell by scanner SC134, hence EcNo became already.
poor & call drop eventually.

8.0 Final Drive Analysis Results.
The following section provides a detail analysis for the short calls for final drive test
performed.
8.1 Final Drive Voice & Scan Summary: Overall
The UE & Scan log files are analysed based on overall, shown as below,

Ec >= -79 69.54% 87.16%
Ec >= -82 79.87% 94.05%
Ec >= -87 90.92% 98.90%
Ec >= -92 95.24% 99.88%
Ec >= -97 97.09% 99.99%
Ec >= -120 100.00% 100.00%
Ec < -120 0.00% 0.00%
Figure 70 Final Drive UE & Scanner RSCP (Ec) Test Summary - Overall

Ec/Io >= -9 99.30% 99.98%
Ec/Io >= -12 99.92% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -16 99.98% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -20 99.99% 100.00%
Ec/Io < -20 0.01% 0.00%
Figure 71 Finall Drive UE & Scanner EcNo (Ec/Io) Test Summary - Overall
Figure 72 Final Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best server plot – Overall

8.2 Final Drive Voice Calls Summary: Overall

On WCDMA 655 100.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Blocked Calls

On WCDMA 0 0.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 653 99.69%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 2 0.31%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 650
99.24%
On GSM 0 0.00%
GSM Call Attempt 0
GSM Blocked Call 0
WCDMA Call Drop 2
GSM Call Drop 0
WCDMA Bad Release 1
WCDMA OK 650
WCDMA to GSM OK 0
GSM OK 0
IRAT Handover 0
Figure 73 Final Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – Overall


Figure 74 Final Drive Voice Calls Classifications – Overall
Analysis Name Calculated Value

Call Setup Time ConAck 4.55
Call Setup Time Con 4.55
Time on 3G to ISHO 0
Total Call Time Ending 3G 42874.18
Total Call Time Ending 2G 0
Idle Time on WCDMA 6610
Idle Time on GSM 0
GSM HO Complete 0
GSM HO Failure 0
WCDMA SHO Complete 5151
WCDMA SHO Failure 0
ISHO Failure From 3G 0
ISHO Complete From 2G 0
Figure 75 Final Drive Voice Calls Properties – Overall

8.3 Final Drive Scanner Analysis : Overall
8.3.1 Final Drive Best EcNo Scan Plot
Figure 76 Final Drive Best EcNo Plot – Overall

8.3.2 Final Drive Best RSCP Scan Plot
Figure 77 Final Drive Best RSCP Plot – Overall

8.3.3 Final Drive Best SC Scan Plot
Figure 78 Final Drive Best SC Scan Plot – Overall

8.4 Final Drive Short call UE Analysis : Overall
8.4.1 Final Drive UE EcNo distribution with CAF & CAD Plot
Figure 79 Final Drive UE EcNo Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – Overall
8.4.2 Final Drive UE RSCP distribution with CAF & CAD Plot
Figure 80 Final Drive UE RSCP Distribution with CAF & CAD plot – Overall

8.4.3 Final Drive UE TxPower distribution Plot
Figure 81 Final Drive UE Tx Power Distribution plot – Overall

8.4.4 Final Drive UE Active Set Size distribution Plot
Figure 82 Final Drive UE Active Set Size Distribution plot – Overall

8.4.5 Final Drive Short calls Call Failure analysis
Call setup completed under SC82 (Santhormok1),
eventually SC31 (Techno1) added into AS. UE Probable log file termination in progress during call
initiated UL CC Disconnect after Call Proceeding & setup. Since following msg for call setup still
CAF1 11.5836 104.906738 12:45:04.534 following msg for call setup still continues. BLER = Tool proceed, no issue actually. RF condition is good
0%, UL Interference = -104. Probable log file during entire call setup procedure. Call disconnect
termination in progress during call setup, near end of initiated by UE, non network or RF issues.
log file.
Severe UL interference causes high BLER &
UE went into idle mode (BCCH) after RB Setup
eventually CAF. Suspect other system operating
complete, BLER went up to 100% & call setup fail
the same frequencies as Mobitel 3G, e.g.
due to High BLER. RF condition is good during the
CAF2 11.5669 104.895752 13:59:42.945 RF broadcasting station etc. Check for possible
entire setup process. UL int = -89. Excessive UL int
interference source around this area. Similar
observed at this surrounding area. Similar problem
problem encountered at this area in previous drive
encountered at this area in previous drive test.
test.
8.4.6 Final Drive Short calls Call Drop analysis
Missing neighbors between SC24 (Toulkok3) &

SC39 (CTN3), cell drag on SC24 w/o sending e1a Add neighbors Toulkok3 <> CTN3. Proposed in
MR to add better detected cell by scanner SC39, neighbor analysis report already. Also, new site to
CAD1 11.59004 104.878372 16:16:27.566 RF
hence EcNo became poor & call drop eventually. be proposed in the future near this area to provide
However, main problem is still due to no dominant good dominance/coverage.
cell nearby to provide good coverage here.
Missing neighbors between SC12 (Mobitel3) &

SC107 (HighSchool2), cell drag on SC12 right after Add neighbors Mobitel3 <> HighSchool2. Proposed
call setup successful, w/o sending e1a MR to add in neighbor analysis report already. Neighbor
CAD2 11.53093 104.931915 15:46:41.570 better detected cell by scanner SC107, hence RF addition here is necessary to avoid call drop on
EcNo became poor & call drop eventually. Drop bridge. Downtilting Mobitel would not help since
occurs on elevated bridge & on top of river, many signal will still reflected on river to top of bridge.
reflected signals here, including Mobitel2.

9.0 Initial Drive & Final Drive Optimization Comparisons.
This section illustrates the comparison results between the Initial Drive & Final Drive test results, highlighting the effect & improvement of the network
quality for the cluster under test. All proposed antenna & parameter changes have been implemented before the final drive test is performed in order
to investigate the impact of change requests.
The list of various change request made & implementation of the changes is illustrated as follow:
Figure 83 Antenna Change Request Implementation updates

Figure 84 Neighbors Analysis Implementation updates

9.1 UE & Scan Summary Comparison
9.1.1 Initial Drive UE & Scanner statistics 9.1.2 Final Drive UE & Scanner statistics
Ec (RSCP) Statistics Handset Scanner Ec (RSCP) Statistics Handset Scanner
Ec >= -79 69.55% 81.02% Ec >= -79 69.54% 87.16%
Ec >= -82 80.72% 90.66% Ec >= -82 79.87% 94.05%
Ec >= -87 91.52% 98.15% Ec >= -87 90.92% 98.90%
Ec >= -92 95.44% 99.84% Ec >= -92 95.24% 99.88%
Ec >= -97 97.34% 100.00% Ec >= -97 97.09% 99.99%
Ec >= -120 100.00% 100.00% Ec >= -120 100.00% 100.00%
Ec/Io (Ec/No) Statistics Handset Scanner Ec/Io (Ec/No) Statistics Handset Scanner
Ec/Io >= -9 97.88% 99.95% Ec/Io >= -9 99.30% 99.98%
Ec/Io >= -12 99.53% 100.00% Ec/Io >= -12 99.92% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -16 99.91% 100.00% Ec/Io >= -16 99.98% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -20 99.98% 100.00% Ec/Io >= -20 99.99% 100.00%
Ec/Io >= -30 100.00% 100.00% Ec/Io >= -30 100.00% 100.00%
Figure 85 Initial Drive UE & Scanner statistics Figure 87 Final Drive UE & Scanner statistics
Scanner Overall Scanner Overall

Average Average
Statistics (Best Statistics (Best
(Linear) (Linear)
Detected) Detected)
Ec (RSCP) -60.14 Ec (RSCP) -58.21
Ec/Io (Ec/No) -3.641 Ec/Io (Ec/No) -3.627
Figure 86 Initial Drive Scanner average statistics Figure 88 Final Drive Scanner average statistics

9.1.3 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner EcNo Plots Comparison
The following plots provide a summary comparison of areas that have been improved after the necessary antenna changes. Cells
with red circles denotes antenna change request & areas with blue circles denotes improved EcNo, RSCP & Best SC areas.
Initial Final
Figure 89 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner EcNo Plots Comparison

9.1.4 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner RSCP Plots Comparison
Initial Final
Figure 90 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner RSCP Plots Comparison

9.1.5 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner Best SC Plots Comparison
Initial Final
Figure 91 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner Best SC Plots Comparison
9.1.6 Initial Drive & Final Drive Scanner Comparison Summary
Average RSCP
-50
-55
-58.21
-60.14
dBm
-60 Ave RSCP
-65
-70
Initial Drive Final Drive
Ave RSCP -60.14 -58.21
Figure 92 Scanner average RSCP Comparison
Average EcNo
-3.62
-3.627
-3.63
dB
Ave EcNo
-3.641
-3.64
-3.65
Initial Drive Final Drive
Ave EcNo -3.641 -3.627
Figure 93 Scanner average EcNo Comparison

Scanner RSCP Aggregate
100.00% 100.00%
95.00% 95.00%
90.00% 90.00%
85.00% 85.00%
80.00% 80.00%
RSCP >= - RSCP >= - RSCP >= - RSCP >= - RSCP >= - RSCP >= -
79dBm 82dBm 87Bm 92dBm 97dBm 120dBm
Initial Drive 81.02% 90.66% 98.15% 99.84% 100.00% 100.00%

Final Drive 87.16% 94.05% 98.90% 99.88% 99.99% 100.00%
Figure 94 Scanner RSCP Aggregate Comparison
Scanner EcNo Aggregate

100.00% 100.00%
99.99% 99.99%
99.98% 99.98%
99.97% 99.97%
99.96% 99.96%
99.95% 99.95%
99.94% 99.94%
99.93% 99.93%
99.92% 99.92%
99.91% 99.91%
99.90% 99.90%
EcNo >= - EcNo >= - EcNo >= - EcNo >= - EcNo >= -
9dB 12dB 16dB 20dB 30dB
Initial Drive 99.95% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Final Drive 99.98% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Figure 95 Scanner EcNo Aggregate Comparison

Figure 96 Initial Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best Server Plot.
Figure 97 Final Drive Scanner RSCP vs EcNo 1st Best Server Plot.

9.2 Voice Calls & PS Calls Summary Comparison
9.2.1 Initial Drive Voice Calls Statistic
On WCDMA 673 100.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Blocked Calls

On WCDMA 0 0.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 657 97.62%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 9 1.37%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 645
95.84%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Figure 98 Initial Drive Voice Calls Statistic
9.2.2 Final Drive Voice Calls Statistic

On WCDMA 655 100.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Total Blocked Calls

On WCDMA 0 0.00%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 653 99.69%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 2 0.31%
On GSM 0 0.00%

On WCDMA 650
99.24%
On GSM 0 0.00%
Figure 99 Final Drive Voice Calls Statistic

9.2.3 Initial Drive & Final Drive CS Calls Summary
Voice Calls Stats Summary

99.69%
100.00% 99.24% 98.93%
99.00%
97.62%
98.00%
97.00%
95.84%
96.00%
95.00% Initial Drive
93.56%
94.00% Final Drive
93.00%
92.00%
91.00%
90.00%
Call Setup Success Call Completion Overall Call
Rate (CSSR) Rate (CCR) Success Rate
(CSR)
Figure 100 Initial Drive & Final Drive Voice Calls Statistic Summary

10.0 Conclusion
A comprehensive report detailing the various issues of CAMGSM-3G has been presented.
Various considerations have been given to scanner & UE data to identify possible RF &
network problems & to provide necessary change recommendations where required in order
to optimize the 3G network.
A brief introduction about the setup of drive test equipment & various scripting information
with regards to the drive testing was provided in order to give a better picture of the data
collection process & procedures.
A detail analysis for voice calls & scanner performance for initial & final drive test are
provided, together with the necessary corrective recommendations for the various problems
encountered, i.e. call failure, call drops, poor EcNo performance etc.
Various call statistics for voice calls & general RF performance from scanner logs were
presented for comparison purpose at the end of the optimization to illustrate the effect of the
change implemented change recommendations.
The following statements illustrate the summary of the comparison results for scanner & CS
voice calls respectively.
• Scanner Analysis comparison:

• 6.14 % & 3.19 %increment in RSCP >-79dBm range & RSCP > -82dBm range
respectively, implying better overall network coverage.
• Scanner EcNo has also improved, although merely 0.03% for EcNo >-9dB,
however, this has significant impact to overall network RF performances & also
imply better cell dominance (less overall interfering cells).
• Scanner RSCP vs EcNo for 1st best server has also improved. First quadrant
where sample bins above the RSCP > -82dBm & EcNo > -12dB has improved
from 92.27% -> 95.1%, implying a better overall cell coverage & quality of
network.
• The various scanner plots showing the improved cell dominance after the
antenna change request is implemented; displayed significant cell dominance
improvement at intended areas (near ToulKok4 & TuekLaok3).
• CS call statistics & summary comparison:

• Improvement of call statistic, Call Setup success rate (CSSR) from 97.62% ->
99.69%, Call Completion rate (CCR) from 95.84% -> 99.24%. Hence the overall
Call Success Rate (CSR) has improved significantly from 93.56% -> 98.93%.
• Most network/NodeB problems encountered during initial drive test is resolved
after the RNC migration is performed, hence indicating that the new RNC-Evo is
also contributing to the overall improvement of the network quality &
performance.
• UE EcNo & RSCP is improved, indicating better network quality and better cell
dominance at intended coverage area after the optimization recommendation is
implemented.
• Problems encountered in the final drive test are mainly missing adjacencies
cases at the edge of 3G network coverage, where problems could be resolved
easily by adding the necessary adjacencies.
Finally, with the improved network performance as illustrated in the comparison results,
Alcatel is committed to deliver and provide quality & professional end to end network
equipments, to further improve the network quality of CAMGSM-3G network deployed in
Phnom Penh City, Cambodia, by means of continuous planning & optimization works.

11.0 Appendixes
11.1 CAMGSM-3G Default Parameters
Parameter Default
Qhyst1s 2 db
Qhyst2s 2 db
Treselections 1s
QqualMin -16 dB
SintraSearch 8 dB
SinterSearch 6 dB
Event1a.RepRange 4 dB
Event1a.TimeToTrigger 120 ms
Event1s.Hysteresis 2 dB
Event1b.RepRange 6 dB
Event1b.TimeToTrigger 640 ms
Event1c.Hysteresis 3 dB
Event1c.TimeToTrigger 120 ms

11.2 Cluster Analysis: Unsynchronized NodeB Case Study
¾ Site Golden City drive test on 29-Dec-2006
• RRC Request Sent and call sets up successfully on SC104 (GoldenCity3).
Active Set
• Signal of GoldenCity3 became poor (EcNo) gradually, while Sonex3 signal is becoming
more dominant.
• Both monitor set & scanner show stronger signal from Sonex3.
Scanner
Monitor Set

• 1st MR sent was not to add better cell (Sonex3) but e2a for emergency inter-system HO
measurement purpose.
• Multiple MR sent after that was e1a but only cells of Golden City (SC103) was
requested to be added, instead of better cells. i.e.Sonex3.
• Eventually call drop due to poor EcNo on serving cell (SC104) & no SHO to better
detected cells.
• Similar chain of events & behavior is observed in the rest of the calls setup in any of the
cells under Golden City.

• The same behavior was observed for call setup successful under other surrounding
cells which unable to SHO to any of the cells in Golden City, as shown below.
• RRC Request Sent and call sets up successfully on Sonex3.
• At the same time signal of Golden City 2 is gradually becoming stronger & more
dominant as observed in scanner and monitor set.
• Again 1st MR sent for e1a was to add SC111 (PP Medical3) which EcNo was very much
poorer than SC104 (Golden City2), as observed in MS & scanner.

• Multiple MR sent & ASU is performed to various cells detected in the monitor set.
However, non of the MR sent was to add SC 104 which is the best cell detected both in
monitor set & scanner.
• Eventually, call drop due to poor EcNo & high interference.
• Problem was resolved after changing defected HW module of Golden City.

-End of Document -


HSDPA Optimization Report - Ericsson

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

HSDPA Optimization Report - Ericsson

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

CAMGSM 3G Radio Network Optimization Report

(Phnom Penh City)

Author: Alcatel Mobile Communications Group

Ref: CAMGSM –3G Cambodia Optimization

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Figure 1 Various Cluster analysis region

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Figure 2 Drive Route Definition

2.1.3 Equipment Used

Nemo Outdoor Nokia 6650 &

Figure 3 Equipment list

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Service Operator Call Originator Call Type

Figure 4 Drive Test Setup Configurations

2.2.2 Scanner Data Collection

2.2.3 Voice Data Collection

• Mobile originating calls.

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

3.1 Voice & Scan Summary: VIP Cluster

Ec Statistics Handset Scanner

Ec/Io Statistics Handset Scanner

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Call Statistics L3 Value Rate

Total Blocked Calls

Total Calls Setup Successfully 88 98.88%

Total Calls Dropped 1 1.14%

Total Calls Completed Successfully 87 97.75%

Figure 8 Initial Drive Voice Calls Test Summary – VIP Cluster

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

WCDMA Blocked Calls GSM Blocked Calls WCDMA Setup Failure

Figure 9 Initial Drive Voice Calls Classifications – VIP Cluster

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Figure 10 Initial Drive Best EcNo Plot – VIP Cluster

3.3.2 Best RSCP Scan Plot

Figure 11 Initial Drive Best RSCP Plot – VIP Cluster

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Figure 12 Initial Drive Best SC Scan Plot – VIP Cluster

3.3.4 Pilot Pollution Plot

Figure 13 Initial Drive Pilot Pollution Plot – VIP Cluster

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Drive test Serving Effect/Probable Cause Comment Group Proposed Action

3.3.6 Scan EcNo Analysis

* No significant problem/poor EcNo observed on scanner EcNo plot.

3.3.7 Scan RSCP Analysis

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

3.4.2 UE RSCP distribution with CAF & CAD Plot

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Figure 16 Initial Drive Neighbors Analysis Plot – VIP Cluster

3.5.2 Neighbors Additions

Figure 17 Initial Drive Neighbors Additions – VIP Cluster

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

4.1 Voice & Scan Summary: DENSE URBAN Cluster

Ec Statistics Handset Scanner

Ec/Io Statistics Handset Scanner

ALCATEL File Reference Date Edition Page

Call Statistics L3 Value Rate