Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
СЕМИНАРСКИ ТРУД
ПРЕДМЕТ:
ТЕМА:
Ментор: Студент:
Мај, 2019
1
Abstract ............................................................................................................................3
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….…...4
1. Age…….…....................................................................................................................5
1.2 Adolescents……………………………………………………………………………….…6
4. Personality…………………………………………………………………………………..12
Concluding remarks………...…………………………………………………………………13
References……………………………………………………………………………………..14
2
Abstract
3
Introduction
4
1. Age
The age of the students is a major factor in our decisions about how and what to
teach. People of different ages have different needs, competences, and cognitive skills;
we might expect children of primary age to acquire much of a foreign language through
play, for example, whereas for adults we can reasonably expect a greater use of
abstract thought.
There are a number of commonly held beliefs about age. Some people say that children
learn languages faster than adults do i.e. they pick up languages effortlessly. Perhaps
this has something to do with the plasticity of a young brain. According to Steven
Pinker, “acquisition is guaranteed for children up to the age of six, is steadily
compromised from then until shortly after puberty, and is rare thereafter” (Pinker
1994:293), this applies not only to the acquisition of the first language, but also to
second or foreign language.
Another belief is that adolescent are unmotivated, surly, and uncooperative and that
therefore they make poor language learners. And there are those who seem to think
that adults have so many barriers to learning, that they only rarely have any success.
There is some truth in many of these beliefs, but they can also be misleading since,
they suggest that everyone is the same. Every student is an individual with different
experiences both in and outside the classroom.
Many would observe that children are more successful language learners than adults. It
is believed that there is a critical period for first language acquisition. Children are
believed to have only a limited number of years during which normal acquisition is
possible. A critical period means that beyond a particular age successful acquisition of a
second language is not possible due to physiological changes in the brain (Kim et al.,
1997). Moreover, adolescents and adults especially tend to be less motivated and
harder to motivate, more self-conscious when it comes to their speaking skills and are
afraid of making mistakes, while that is not that often the case with younger children. A
more sophisticated version of the critical period hypothesis is the concept of „sensitive‟
period for language learning by Slobin (1982). The sensitive period implies that there is
a period in one’s life (during childhood) when second language acquisition is optimized.
Slobin (1982) argues that of the sensitive period of language learning is proven by the
fact that the universal age of onset of production, rate of acquisition and age of
5
completion of language learning is the same and it is relatively unaffected by the
environmental variations and individual cognitive ability.
1.2 Adolescents
It is widely accepted that one of the key issues in adolescence, is the search for
individual identity, which provides the key challenge for this age group. Identity has to
be forged among classmates and friends, peer approval may be considerably more
important for the student than the attention of the teacher which, for young children, is
so crucial.
There are number of reasons why students and teenage students in particular may be
disruptive in class. Apart from the need for self-esteem and the peer approval they may
provoke from being disruptive, there are other factors too, such as boredom, not to
6
mention problems they bring into class from outside school. However, teenagers if they
are engaged, have a great capacity to learn, a great potential for creativity, and a
passionate commitment to things which interest them. Our job, as teachers, must be to
provoke student engagement with material which is relevant and involving. At the same
time we need to do we can to bolster our students’ self-esteem. Students should be
encouraged to respond to texts and situations with their own thoughts and experience,
rather than just by answering questions and doing abstract learning activities. We must
give them tasks which they are able to do, rather than risk humiliating them.
7
2. Motivation and Attitude
Without any motivation or positive attitude, there can hardly be a successful
process of learning. According to Ellis (1985:118), “motivation and attitudes are
important factors, which help to determine the level of proficiency achieved by different
learners.” Savignon (1976:295, according to Ellis, 1985) even declares that “attitude is
the single most important factor in second language learning.”
According to Gardner and Lambert (1972) the following two types of motivation exist:
Integrative: found in individuals who want are interested in the second language in order
to integrate with and become a part of a target community/ culture; here the learner
wants to resemble and behave like the target community. And Instrumental: found in
individuals who want to get learn a second language with the objective of getting
benefits from the second language skill. Objectives, such as business advancement,
increase in professional status; educational goals etc. motivate an individual to learn a
second language in this case. Both the types of motivations have different roles to play.
Both can lead to success.
Various scholars have identified that there are individual learner difference in second
language acquisition. As part of culture, language is described as an element of growing
up. Language is also regarded as an element of culture that provides motivation to
individuals in its own right. Just like any other cultural element, language is acquired
differently from one individual to another. A similar case has been identified for second
languages. In learning second languages, motives, goals and motivation have been
identified and developing differences among individuals. In learning second languages
integrative and instrumental types of motivation influence the individual differently. On
the other hand, individuals conceptualize these types of motivation differently.
Motivation is a variable that determines the level and success of learning a second
language.
8
3. Learning Styles and Strategies
The ways the learner applies while studying are called learning techniques and if
used in combination to develop a plan, are called learning strategies. According to
Oxford (1990), learning strategies are “specific actions, behaviors, steps, or techniques
students use – often consciously – to improve their progress in apprehending,
internalizing, and using the L2”. Some of these are: repeating silently what is heard,
memorizing dialogues, seeking opportunities for communication in the target language,
etc. With regard to preferred learning activities, a learning style of an individual can be
identified.
9
2. Analytical learning style: Learners with an analytical style are independent, like to
solve problems, and enjoy tracking down ideas and developing principles on their own.
Such learners prefer a logical, systematic presentation of new learning material with
opportunities for learners to follow up on their own. Analytical learners are serious, push
themselves hard, and are vulnerable to failure.
3. Communicative learning style: Learners with a communicative learning style prefer a
social approach to learning. They need personal feedback and interaction, and learn
well from discussion and group activities. They thrive in a democratically run class.
4. Authority-oriented learning style: Learners with an authority-oriented style are said to
be responsible and dependable. They like and need structure and sequential
progression. They relate well to a traditional classroom. They prefer the teacher as an
authority figure. They like to have clear instructions and to know exactly what they are
doing; they are not comfortable with consensus-building discussion.
When acquiring a foreign language, learning strategies can be of significant importance.
10
4. Compensatory strategies (e.g., guessing from the context; circumlocution; and
gestures and pause words): help make up for missing knowledge.
5. Affective strategies, such as identifying one’s mood and anxiety level, talking about
feelings, rewarding oneself, and using deep breathing or positive self talk, help learners
manage their emotions and motivation level.
6. Social strategies (e.g., asking questions, asking for clarification, asking for help,
talking with a native-speaking conversation partner, and exploring cultural and social
norms): enable the learner to learn via interaction with others and understand the target
culture.
11
4. Personality
Personality of the learner is another controversial matter being considered a factor
influencing foreign language acquisition. There are a number of personality
characteristics that may affect L2 learning, such as: extroversion vs. introversion, self
esteem, inhibition, risk-taking, anxiety. It is believed that extroverted learners learn more
rapidly and are more successful than introverted learners. Krashen (1981, according to
Ellis, 1985:120) argues that “an outgoing personality may contribute to acquisition.”
However, there are some research results that contradict the above findings. Naiman et
al. (1978, quoted in Ellis, 1985) found no significant relationship between
extroversion/introversion and proficiency. Similarly, social skills and inhibition are
considered segments of one’s personality possibly influencing foreign language
acquisition; however, research findings about their actual effect are rather controversial.
Human personality in all its shapes and colors brings variety to this world. Thus, a
second language learner will make choices of strategies and skills according to bent of
his/her personality. Furthermore, many researchers claim that no successful learning
activity can take place without some self- esteem and self confidence. Coopersmith
(1967) defines self- esteem as a personal judgment of worthiness that is expressed in
the attitudes that the individual holds towards himself/herself. Brodkey and Shore (1976)
revealed that self-esteem appears to be an important variable in SLA, particularly in
view of cross-cultural factors of second language learning. Moreover, anxiety is a factor
that is that is closely related with self-esteem and inhibition and risk-taking. Anxiety can
play an important role in L2 learning if it interferes with the learning process. Even
though it is a common feeling, it is not easy to define. It comes with the feelings of
uneasiness, frustration, self-doubt, apprehension, or worry. A learner’s willingness to
communicate has also been related to anxiety. It is often affected by the number of
people present, the topic of conversation, and the formality of the circumstances.
12
Concluding Remarks
Students are different and they learn in different ways. The question is not whether
students have individual learning styles, but how to deal with them. The first problem
has to do with identifying the differences, and the second entails responding
appropriately to the learning problems created by those differences.
Grady (1984) suggests measures to take in response to the educational problems
caused by individual learning styles. The first is to administer an evaluative, self-
reporting inventory to ascertain students’ learning preferences. The second measure is
to balance instructional strategies. Teachers initiate this approach by making a careful
analysis of the learning preferences of each student. They can choose the type of
materials, techniques, and activities that seem best suited to the students they have in
that particular class and use them when presenting and practicing new material.
Occasionally, however gearing classroom instruction to one learning style for short
periods of time provides opportunities for students to expand their abilities in learning
materials and activities that are not directed toward their preferred learning style.
McDonough (1981) notes that one positive way to deal with individual learning styles is
to diagnose the problems of those students who are achieving below their expected
capabilities. One approach that has great potential is to divide students into groups that
seem to have similar learning styles prior to the opening day of class and then to use
the most effective method in each group. Many broad methodological comparisons
have revealed aptitude - treatment instruction, which means that students with particular
learning styles or aptitudes do better with one method while other students have higher
achievement scores with another. Teachers can also attempt to modify students’
learning styles if they cannot alter the materials or the instruction, or do not want to do
so.
13
References:
Griffiths, S. Soruc, A. (2019). Managing Individual Differences in the Classroom.
TeachingEnglish. Retrieved May 2019, from
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/managing-individual-differences-language-classroom
The Brain and Learning: Individual Differences in Learning Styles.44
Ukessays (2016). Individual Learner Differences in Second Language Acquisition.
Ukessays.com. Retrieved May 2019, from: https://www.ukessays.com/essays/english-
language/individual-learner-differences-in-second-language-acquisition-english-language-
essay.php
Oxford, R.L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Oxford:
GALA
14