Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
world in terms of acting out a set of elements, Map of the Middle East
some of which are resources. The geopolitics of oil Faculté Faculté des sciences de la
explains very well that from the 1920s onwards, société (/w/index.php?
the major oil companies emerged with economic title=Facult%C3%A9_des_scie
and political interests in the regions of the Middle nces_de_la_soci%C3%A9t%C
East. When we talk about geopolitics, we are 3%A9&action=edit&redlink=1)
talking about strategic issues related to the Département Département de science
presence of resources, important elements of politique et relations
economic and political development. Geopolitics internationales (/w/index.php?
will consider the fact that it is interesting to study title=D%C3%A9partement_de
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 2/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
Περιεχόμενα
1 The Concept of the Middle East
5.1 Bibliographie
5.2 Articles
6 References
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 3/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
The vision of the Middle East strengthened in the years of World War II and immediately after the
war. These are strategic reasons, because the stakes of the Second World War will also be played
out in the Middle East. The whole strategic issue of the Second World War sets an important
mission for the Middle East to hold the war effort and prevent it from joining the Axis powers. On
the other hand, the Middle East is important for its energy and human resources for the
continuation of the war. The Middle East is a post-war economic development issue.
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 4/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
In the world that is in the process of being built, with the redefinition of resources, a link is being
established between the economic exploitation of resources and the political question. The
question is, what are the right political regimes so that there can be effective economic
management? It is the relationship between economic resources and the political issue.
In the context of the Second World War and the conflict with the Axis powers, the issue at stake is
the possession of natural resources for the continuation of the war. The post-World War II period is
an important issue because there is a need for resources for reconstruction. This is an important
strategic approach, but it will be based on a major divorce of the American position which is an
anti-colonial position. The Americans are anti-colonists who reproach the English and French
systems for having manufactured colonies that are against the idea of freedom. The American
power will also play in the Middle East against French and British interests.
In the midst of the Cold War, the discourse legitimizing the independence of the colonies - "coming
out" and sacrificing the British and French from the Middle East, because the fear is that in the
midst of the Cold War, the anti-colonialist model developed in the colonies would be a Marxist
model. They will work to bring out the British and French power in the Middle East. The Soviet
power is also seeking to use the Middle East as an area of influence, because the economic
stakes are high and it is seeking to have an outlet towards the Mediterranean Sea.
The constitution of the State of Israel also acts as a pole of political
attraction for the region. Israeli wars began in 1949 with the Arab-Israeli
conflict. Israel appears to the Arab population as a state that has usurped
the land, and to the Western powers as a state that strengthens Western
positions.
The first ally was Saudi Arabia's regime with the royal family of the Saudi
ben, which founded modern Arabia with the help of American power in
1932. The stakes are economic and petroleum. The United States relied
on Saudi royalty to counter British oil interests without completely ousting (/wiki/Fichier:Time_May_2
Time May 22 1978,
the British ally from the Gulf coastal areas, as England remained a natural
Prince Fahad Saudi
ally. It's a paradox. Arabia Ibn Saud.
The Measures
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 5/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
Conventional means are the sale and control of arms sales to the Middle East by France, the
United States and Great Britain. On the other hand, we must think of the military presence that will
lead to the permanent parking of the Fifth Fleet in the Mediterranean to secure the transit routes
for strategic supplies, but also to intimidate or react in the event of threats to its nationals.
Strengthen support for Israel, which is seen as an area of stability to think of the Middle East as a
powder keg. In the Arab-Israeli wars, Israel has always found strong support from the West for
arms and logistics.
The great conflict that will arise is the conflict that will appear with Nasser. Nasser will turn to the
Americans to finance the Aswan dam which will refuse to turn to the Soviets who will finance it.
The Nassérien regime presents itself as socialist, but not as Marxist. Nasser will be the great
charismatic leader of pan-Arabism which is the idea of the great Arab and secular nation. It is the
introduction of a model that is significantly linked to the Soviet Union, but at the same time seeks
to assert an original position of the non-aligned countries.
The Middle East appears to the West as an area of uncertainty, a complex area where control and
precautionary systems must be developed. There is a double paradox of the American position in
the 1950s with a doctrine that aims, on the one hand, to support the national liberation of peoples,
and, on the other hand, to support revolutions that are in progress, but whose outcome is unknown
and which often turns against the Americans and their allies such as, for example, France in
Algeria, which is rebelling against arms trafficking from Egypt for the FLN. Finally, US interference
in local affairs in the name of a strategic imperative. Since this region is a strategic region in terms
of resources and political management, the American position will be both to maintain historical
and cultural ties with traditional European allies such as England and France and to think that
interference is also necessary.
This dual position involves several possible strategies:
containment strategy: produce alliances to counter communism, such as the Baghdad Pact of
1955, which brings together Great Britain, Iran, Turkey, Pakistan and Iraq. The idea is to limit
the advance of communist influence;
The strategy of replacement or substitution: to replace a former colonial power such as, for
example, Great Britain, particularly in Saudi Arabia and Iraq.
Building on Israel
The logic is to rely on Israel, first of all, because there is an awareness of the impossibility of
building an anti-communist front in the Middle East. There is the fear that "Arab socialism" may
spread through the export of the Egyptian model through the transition from "Arab socialism" to
pan-Arabism. Israel appears to be an important lever for controlling Arab socialism.
For Americans, Arab socialism appears to be dangerous. The dual purpose of "Arab nationalism"
that worries the United States: Concern about building an autonomous economic development of
these countries on the fact that these countries could have economic independence; Concern that
this may lead to a transfer of wealth from the former pro-Western dominant classes to new
pronationalist categories that run counter to their own interests.
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 6/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
from the Pahlavi regime, but also by increasing American aid to Israel
with confirmed support in the 1973 war, with a response to the Arab oil
embargo.
Through Henri Kissinger is set up a "strategy of small steps" in
order to drive one by one the regimes in favour of the United
States by a specific economic aid as, for example, with Egypt
which becomes an indispensable partner engaged in the peace
process in particular with the Camp David Accords. On the other
hand, the United States will help Iraq in the context of the
Ayatollah Khomeiny's war against Iran in order to prevent the
(/wiki/Fichier:Accord_camp_david_
spread of the Islamist revolution.
President Sadat of Egypt,
In addition, there has been an implementation of the Delinkage President Carter and Prime
Minister Begin of Israel sign the
strategy in international relations which are operations will seek to
Camp David Accords: [2]A
separate states from the same space to transfer them to the Framework for Peace.
American area. The American strategy is to separate Israel's
neighbours from the Gulf countries in order to incorporate the latter
into a new geopolitics.
Back to hegemony
The 1980s and 1990s were interpreted as a return to the Middle Eastern scene in the United
States. This return is manifested by the Soviet withdrawal towards Syria and South Yemen.
Ideologically, the delinkage strategy is implemented by addressing each partner's concerns. This
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 7/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
Bandwagoning State : refers to the act of weaker states joining a stronger power or coalition
[3][4]
within balance of power politics. . This makes it possible to gain influence in the imperial
system in order to bring the state back to itself.
Pivotal State : countries whose fate determines the survival and success of the surrounding
[5]
region and ultimately the stability of the international system . It is a state capable of
structuring a region. Managing diplomatic and economic relations is the ability to politically
stabilize a region.
Backlasch States : there are few « backlash states » : Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Iraq and
Libya. For now they lack the resources of a superpower, which would enable them to seriously
threaten the democratic order being created around them. Nevertheless, their behavior is
often aggressive ansd defiant. The ties between them are growing as they seek to thwart of
[6]
quarantine themselves from a global trend to which they seem incapable of adapting . It is a
state which has no democratic dimension and which has the power to be a nuisance,
particularly if it is belligerent.
Rogue States : some states considered threatening to the world's peace. This means meeting
certain criteria, such as being ruled by authoritarian regimes that severely restrict human
[7][8][9]
rights, sponsor terrorism, and seek to proliferate weapons of mass destruction . This is
an additional level in the gradation of conflict. In this doctrine, it is States that achieve world
peace through authoritarian rule, restrict human freedom and finance or use terrorism as a
means of securing their power. The use of terrorism is a means of ensuring its power. It is
also the one that makes nuclear proliferation and weapons of mass destruction.
These terms make it possible to construct the imperial discourse on the Middle East which is the
theory of "friend enemies".
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 8/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
The pivotal state theory raises the question of domino theory. If a pivotal state collapses, what are
the consequences for neighbouring states? To think of the pivotal State is therefore to think of
stopping any domino process. This raises the question of which countries are pivotal in the
geographical area concerned? According to Paul Kennedy, there are two models: Egypt and
Turkey.
There are two levels of interest in Egypt:
contain the Islamist wave and through it any revolutionary demands in the region. Reference
to the Iran of Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution. This is based on any revolutionary ideal in
counterpoint to the Iranian revolution.
to be an anchor in diplomacy and the peace process with Israel. Without a pivotal state as a
bridge state, this diplomacy would be doomed to failure.
According to Daniel Pipes, Egypt is helping to counterbalance and rebalance the political balance
of power in the Middle East. Egypt's entry into the regional geopolitical scene - a powerful
negotiating factor with Israel - could be credited to the weakening of the Arab camp and the
Palestinians.
However, it recommends that the privileged relationship between the United States and Turkey
should not be abandoned in favour of a single Egypt-United States axis. Turkey's geopolitics are
particularly interesting. The axis must be strengthened with the Turkish regime on the basis of
particularly significant military aid. This conception is similar to that of the British historian and
strategist Paul Kennedy, who testifies to the danger for the United States of abandoning any
privileged axis with Turkey. Paul Kennedy, Grand Strategies in War and Peace, 1991; Preparing
for the Twenty-First Century, 1993; From War to Peace: Altered Strategic Landscapes in the
Twentieth Century, 2000).
According to Kennedy, U. S. aid to Egypt must be contained in
strict terms of economic aid and food aid. Military aid could play
into the hands of enemies from within. Egypt's problem is to have
90% desert, little agriculture and 90% wheat imports. Kennedy's
strategy is to provide economic aid, food aid, but we are not going
to push too much on military aid, since Egypt poses a problem with
the military aid that is the presence of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is
the idea of mastered aid on the basis that complex Egypt is seen
by American strategists as less structurally sound. The strategic
analysis postulates that Egypt has a less structurally sound regime
than Turkey. (/wiki/Fichier:Obama-
mubarak.jpg)
Since the Gulf War, the United States has refocused its strategy
on Saudi Arabia as the only pivotal state. It is a state perceived as
stronger is serving American interests.
Egypt is thus led to redefine a more complex role with the reconquest of a geostrategic place since
Nasser:
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 9/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
willingness to regain a significant place in the Arab League. Behind the image that Mubarak
wanted to portray, there was the Nasser image of leader in the Middle East;
Seeking a mediation role between the United States and Israel and other states in the region;
find a regional diplomatic leadership role;
Good offices in a lot of complex cases, i. e. a conflict management policy in the region.
economic development assistance to stabilize political regimes on the basis of trade and
economic opportunities;
military aid to ensure that the country concerned has the means to defend itself
geostrategically, particularly through the sale of arms;
an intervention policy based on "low intensity war"[low intensity conflict] based on
conventional weapons and devices
repressive mechanisms such as the embargo raising the issue of the United Nations management
report.
Anthony Lake posited in the mid-1990s the need for "double containment" for the two conflicting
countries of Iran and Iraq. The position is very cynical. We must take advantage of the conflict
between the two systems of government to weaken each other and avoid a leadership position for
one of them, which is considered dangerous for regional balance and American strategic interests.
Zbigniew Brzeziski, former adviser to President Jimmy Carter, refutes Anthony Lake's theory of
double containment and proposes a more adaptive variable theory based on it in the mid-1990s:
The absolute containment of Iraq, whose military might and the Praetorian regime is defined
as a major threat to regional security, Gulf peace and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process;
a more moderate containment with Iran. The hope of possible dialogue makes it possible to
imagine the trivialization of political relations with Iran. The crisis of political Islam gives hope
for a natural change in the regime. We are not going to weaken Iran, but we are trying to build
a regime through a different strategy;
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 10/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
more active dialogue with Europe on the policy to be pursued in the Middle East.
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 11/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
cultures are not "mixable". The only possible modernity is Western, which caricatures Islam and
presents it as a danger. The problem with best-sellers is that this kind of work diffuses simplistic
perceptions.
Anthony Lake
Lake is an academic at John Hopkins University, a national security
advisor to President Clinton. He based a new theory on the ashes of the
theory of the containment of bipolarity of the Cold War. It is going to
manufacture an enlargement', producing an opening through a market
economy. From the moment we open up States to a market economy, the
idea is that we will achieve political liberalization that will create a great
global market and bring about world peace.
It is no longer a question of containing the enemy or its allies, but rather of
producing enlargement through a market economy that is itself open - and
(/wiki/Fichier:Anthony_La
which opposes the command economy. Enlargement by the economy
Anthony Lake.
aims, as a result of this effect, at political enlargement, that is to say the
opening up of regimes considered as blocked and anti-democratic.
It is a conceptualization of a new globalized world with:
consolidation of the hard core of market democracies: the United States, Canada, Japan and
Europe
consolidation of the "new democracies": Latin America, South Africa, Nigeria.
The counter-attack or the strategy of liberalising subversion is elaborated against hostile states
such as Iran, Iraq or Cuba, which are States doomed to blockade. Humanitarian aid in areas of
extreme poverty - great humanitarian concern - is set up to promote market democracy. A new
polarized world emerges which is no longer that of liberalism opposed to dirigisme, but that of
democracy against barbarism.
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 12/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
Democracy can only be an alliance with the United States. States that are in the process of
economic liberalization, including China and Vietnam, are states with a developed market
economy, but with authoritarian regimes; or some states in the Middle East are generating more
benevolence than hostility.
The question that is raised is what is the extent of Barbary? Or the Barbarian Zone. These are
tyrannical states, states against democracy and the market economy, but also states based on
military regimes and/or religion. On the other hand, there is a return to a theory of unilateralism. It
can be noted that the great absentee in Anthony Lake's thought is the UN, which is considered as
impenetrable and unthinkable.
Through his three analyses, Alain Joxe invites us to think of American geopolitics from 1993
onwards in terms of "stocks of imperial representations" which can be related to the following
figures:
the autistic structure. There is no longer interaction to seek with the other and there is no
understanding of the world;
The leadership of the United States is reaffirmed;
the search for a principle of minimalist expeditionary intervention. We're not going to get
involved on any more shaky fields.
There is the distancing of tyranny as the domination of politico-military over the economy. To
understand the diplomatic and political consequences of 9/11, we must understand this autistic
position.
Annexes
Bibliographie
Benjamin Barber, Djihad versus McWorld, Fouad Nohra, Stratégies américaines pour
le Moyen-Orient, Beyrouth, Al- Bouraq,
mondialisation et intégrisme contre la
1999 ;
démocratie, Paris, Pluriel, 1996 ;
Pierre Hassner, « Le Barbare et le Jean-Christophe Rufin, L’Empire et les
Articles
"Moyen-Orient Et Pays Limitrophes Géographie." Moyen-Orient Et Pays Limitrophes
Géographie. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 July 2014. <http://le-lutin-savant.com/g-moyen-orient-
geographie.html (http://le-lutin-savant.com/g-moyen-orient-geographie.html)>.
Foreign Policy,. (2015). Forget Sykes-Picot. It’s the Treaty of Sèvres That Explains the
Modern Middle East.. Retrieved 11 August 2015, from
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 13/14
12/9/2019 Middle East Geopolitics - Baripedia
https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/08/10/sykes-picot-treaty-of-sevres-modern-turkey-middle-east-
borders-turkey/ (https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/08/10/sykes-picot-treaty-of-sevres-modern-
turkey-middle-east-borders-turkey/)
W.P. Deac. ‘Duel for the Suez Canal.’ Military History, Vol. 18 Issue 1. Apr2001, pp. 58- 64.
P.H.J. Davies. 2012. Intelligence and Government in Britain and the United States, Vol. 2. ‘Ch
7: The Great Centralization, 1957-66’, pp. 163-177.
R.J. Aldrich. 2001. The Hidden Hand. ‘Ch 21: Defeat in the Middle East: Iran and Suez’, pp.
464-494.
W.S. Lucas. ‘The missing link? Patrick Dean, Chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee.’
Contemporary British History. Vol.13 No. 2. 1999, pp. 117-125.
P. Cradock. 2002. Know Your Enemy: How the JIC Saw the World. ‘Ch 18. Intelligence and
Policy.
References
1. Page personnelle de Rémi Baudoui sur le site de l'Université de Genève (https://unige.ch/sciences-societe/sper
i/membres/remi-baudoui/)
2. "Academy of Achievement Photo Credit." Academy of Achievement. Academy of Achievement, n.d. Web. 17
July 2014. <http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/photocredit/achievers/car0-015
(http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/photocredit/achievers/car0-015)>.
3. Quincy Wright (1890-1980) in A Study of War, 1942
4. Kenneth Waltz in Theory of International Politics, 1979
5. Robert S. Chase, Emily Hill, and Paul M. Kennedy, The Pivotal State, 2000
6. Anthony Lake, Confronting Backlash States, 1994
7. T.D.Allman, Rogue State: America at War with the World, 2004
8. William Blum, Rogue state: a guide to the world's only superpower. 2006
9. Noam Chomsky, Rogue States : The Rule of Force in World, 2000
10. Joxe, Alain. L'empire Du Chaos: The Republics Facing American Domination in the Post-Cold War. Paris: La
Découverte, 2004.
Η σελίδα αυτή τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία φορά στις 17 Δεκεμβρίου 2018, στις 19:23.
Το περιεχόμενο είναι διαθέσιμο σύμφωνα με την Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) εκτός αν αναφέρεται διαφορετικά.
Πολιτική ιδιωτικού απορρήτου (/wiki/Baripedia:Politique_de_confidentialit%C3%A9)
Σχετικά με Baripedia (/wiki/Baripedia:%C3%80_propos_de)
Αποποίηση ευθυνών (/wiki/Baripedia:Avertissements_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9raux)
https://baripedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Geopolitics#Building_on_Israel 14/14