Sunteți pe pagina 1din 5

Correlations

Gender Sickness

Pearson Correlation 1 .113

Gender Sig. (2-tailed) .433

N 50 50
Pearson Correlation .113 1

Sickness Sig. (2-tailed) .433

N 50 50
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Sickness * Gender 50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%


Sickness * Age 50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%
Pyscologicalproblems *
50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%
Gender
Pyscologicalproblems * Age 50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%

Variables Entered/Removeda

Model Variables Variables Method


Entered Removed

Gender,
1 . Enter
Counsellingb

a. Dependent Variable: Pyscologicalproblems


b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the


Square Estimate

1 .370a .137 .100 .33336

a. Predictors: (Constant), Gender, Counselling

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Regression .828 2 .414 3.726 .031b

1 Residual 5.223 47 .111

Total 6.051 49

a. Dependent Variable: Pyscologicalproblems


b. Predictors: (Constant), Gender, Counselling
Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.


Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta

(Constant) 1.251 .244 5.122 .000

1 Counselling .282 .104 .393 2.706 .009

Gender .066 .102 .094 .645 .522

a. Dependent Variable: Pyscologicalproblems

Correlations

Pyscologicalpro Counselling
blems

Pearson Correlation 1 .359*

Pyscologicalproblems Sig. (2-tailed) .010

N 50 50
Pearson Correlation .359* 1

Counselling Sig. (2-tailed) .010

N 50 50

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

S-ar putea să vă placă și