Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

Bilateral maxillary canines agenesis:

a case report and a literature review


C. LOMBARDO*, E. BARBATO**, R. LEONARDI***

ABSTRACT. Background Agenesis of permanent canines is an uncommon condition that affects human teeth. In
fact, canine is the most variable positioned tooth, it can be found palatally or facially displaced or ectopically
erupted from the dental arch. On the contrary, canine agenesis is a rare finding in Caucasian populations, but
it may be relatively more common in Asian groups. This dental anomaly is firstly influenced by genetic, and less
often by systemic and environmental factors. Generally, it can occur in association with other dental
disturbances or as a solitary anomaly. Prevalence of agenesis permanent teeth varies between 4.5% and 7.4%
in general Caucasian populatio. Aim The purpose of this report is to discuss the aetiology, prevalence, diagnosis
and clinical implications of canine agenesis. Case report This paper reports an unusual case of bilateral,
congenitally missing canines in a healthy 10 year old Italian male.

KEYWORDS: Agenesis, Aplasia, Canines, Caucasian, Maxillary.

Introduction van der Weide et al., 1993]. Often in this latter case
Congenitally missing teeth (CMT) is an anomaly several teeth are missing, including the canine,
characterised by the lack of one or more teeth. It may although with a lower frequency. On the other hand,
result in dental malposition, periodontal damage, lack congenitally missing permanent teeth involving
of maxillary and mandibular bone height development, maxillary canine, in nonsyndromic patient, are rare. In
aesthetic and functional consequences. This anomaly is fact very few reports have been found in literature
relatively common in permanent dentition for some [Robertson, 1962; Lum and Lim, 1976; Leong et
teeth (third molar, premolars and lateral incisors). The Calache, 1999; Cho et al., 2004] that deal mostly with
prevalence of hypodontia varies according to evolutive maxillary canine agenesis.
[Anderson et al., 1975], local [Stafne and Gibilisco, This case report describes a bilateral canine agenesis
1975; Kindelan et al., 1998] systemic [Sperber et al., in an Italian boy. A literature review has been carried
1963] and genetic factors [Arte et al., 1996; out and clinical implications discussed.
Goldenberg, 2000]. Recent reports have shown that in
the Caucasian population the prevalence of hypodontia
in permanent dentition (third molar excluded) is about Case report
4.5-7.4%, and the most commonly missing tooth is the A 10 year old Italian boy was referred to the
mandibular second premolar [Backman and Wahlin, Orthodontic Clinic of the University of Catania (Italy)
2001; Nordgarden et al., 2002]. Permanent dentition for orthodontic treatment. He was in good health with
hypodontia can occur as a solitary anomaly or in no history of maxillary trauma nor any kind of
association with head and neck syndromes [Schalk, syndrome. The clinical examination included
recording teeth and their morphology. He presented
the following teeth (fig. 1):
- on the upper right side, central and lateral
*Department of Orthodontics. Catania Dental College. University of Catania. permanent incisors, deciduous canine, deciduous
Italy. PhD student.
**Department of Orthodontics. Rome Dental College. University “La Sapienza”.
molars, and first permanent molar;
Rome. Italy. Full Professor. - on the left upper side, central permanent incisor,
***Department of Pedodontics and Department of Orthodontics. Catania Dental
College. University of Catania. Italy. Associate Professor.
deciduous lateral incisor, canine and molars, first
e-mail: rleonard@unict.it
permanent molar;
- on the lower left side, central and lateral permanent

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY • 1/2007


BILATERAL MAXILLARY CANINES AGENESIS

incisors, deciduous canine, deciduous molars, and the primary maxillary canines and lateral incisor
first permanent molar; showed a slight degree of resorption, less than half of
- on the lower right side, central and lateral the initial radicular length (fig. 3).
permanent incisors, deciduous canine, first
permanent premolar, deciduous second molar and
first permanent molar. Discussion
His chief complaint was the agenesis of bilateral The permanent maxillary canine, on its long eruptive
maxillary canines associated with monolateral absence pathway, may often be affected by anomalies. It is
of the left lateral incisor. The clinical history ruled out perhaps the most variably positioned tooth in human
any possibility of the missing canines having been dentition. It may be frequently displaced in the dental
extracted or the patient having undergone dental arch either facially or palatally or, less often, deflected
trauma that could have caused alteration or deviation mechanically and may undergo subsequent ectopic
of the correspondent dental germs. The persistence of drift resulting in transposition. On the contrary, canine
the deciduous maxillary and mandibular canines could agenesis is a very rare condition. It has been reported
be detected both clinically and radiographically (fig. 1, mainly in the Chinese population: Cho et al. (2004)
2). described the radiographic findings in 32 Chinese
The upper deciduous canines and the left lateral children with congenitally missing permanent teeth
incisor displayed no initial process of radicular regarding only maxillary canines. Of the 32 cases,
resorption (fig. 2) in contrast to the lower elements that only 9 were “bilateral”. However in the Caucasian
were reabsorbed due to permanent teeth eruption. The population it is a very rare kind of agenesis and, except
medical and dental family history was not contributory for a few published studies, this condition is not
for this kind of teeth agenesis. clinically known. One of these studies reported only
One and a half year later this case was visited again: five cases of congenitally missing permanent teeth

FIG. 1 - Intraoral view of patient’s teeth. a) front view; b) lateral right view; c) lateral left view. Arrows show the deciduous
canines.

FIG. 2 - Orthopantomography shows aplasia of maxillary FIG. 3 - Twenty months later orthopantomographic x-ray
canines bilaterally (arrows) and left lateral incisor. No shows that root resorption of maxillary bilateral canines
initial resorption can be detected. had started.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY • 1/2007 39


C. LOMBARDO, E. BARBATO, R. LEONARDI

involving maxillary canines among 13.459 white occlusion, alignment and facial biotype [Barberìa et
American children (0.037%), whereas two of such al., 1988]. The first therapeutic choice can be the
cases were found out of 1481 black children (0.14%) extraction of primary teeth accompanied by
in the same study [Muller et al., 1970]. The orthodontic space closure and premolar coronoplasty.
aetiopathogenesis of nonsyndromic canine agenesis in The second one is retaining the deciduous teeth until
permanent dentition is not well clarified. Surely some the end of the growth. The advantage of this treatment
variation in population, continents and among races is that deciduous teeth preserve the alveolar bone
may play a fundamental role in the development of tissue until the full growth has been reached. This
canine aplasia. provides maximum potential for implant-prosthetic
The main cause of tooth agenesis has a genetic treatment without bone grafting in favour of an
origin. It seems to be an autosomal dominant model excellent aesthetic and functional behaviour.
with incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity
[Pirinen and Arte, 2004]. Moreover, an autosomal
recessive model inheritance is also possible [Pirinen et References
al., 2001]. Sex-linked inheritance patterns and a Anderson BL, Thompson GW, Popovich F. Evolutionary dental
polygenic multifactorial model of inheritance have changes. Am J Phys Antrop 1975; 43:95-102.
also been suggested [Suarez and Spence, 1974; Arte S, Nieminen P, Pirinen S, Thesleff I, Peltonen L. Gene defect
Chosak et al., 1975; Brook, 1984; Peck et al., 1993]. in hypodontia: exclusion of EGF, EGFR, and FGF-3 as
Other causes that may arrest canine tooth development candidate genes. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1346-1352.
are environmental factors that operate in the dental Backman B, Wahlin B.Variations in number and morphology of
region, such as fracture, surgical jaw procedures and permanent teeth in 7-year-old Swedish children. Int J Paediatr
extraction of the preceding primary tooth [Grahnen, Dent 2001; 11:11-17.
1956]. Permanent dentition hypodontia is often Barbería E, Moreno JP, De Nova MJ, Costa F. Guías clínicas ante
characterised by retention of deciduous teeth beyond un diagnóstico de agenesias dentarias. Rev Iberoam Ortod
the age at which they are normally shed. Generally the 1988; 8: 9- 12.
canine teeth (apart from age) are more likely to show Brook AH. A unifying aetiological explanation for anomalies of
little or no resorption [Haselden et al., 2001]. human tooth number and size. Arch Oral Biol 1984; 29:373-
This case report supports the genetic theories about 378.
canine agenesis, which is a congenital disorder able to Cho SY, Lee CK, Chan JY. Congenitally missing maxillary
cause functional and aesthetic problems, altering the permanent canines: report of 32 cases from an ethnic Chinese
development of an ideal occlusion, in fact this tooth population. Int J Paediatr Dent 2004; 14:446-450.
guides the jaw during lateral movements creating a Chosack A, Eidelman E, Choen T. Hypodontia: a polygenic trait: a
distance between dental arches. Tooth development is family study among Israeli Jews. J Dent Res 1975; 54:16-19.
under strict genetic control; it has become evident that Goldenberg M, Das P, Messersmith M, Stockton DW, Patel PI,
gene networks regulate the development of teeth as in D’Souza RN. Clinical, radiographic, and genetic evaluation of a
other vertebrate organs. Mutations in these genes, novel form of autosomal-dominant oligodontia. J Dent Res
during morphogenesis processes, have been identified 2002; 79:1469-1475.
in humans as causes of dental defects, mainly Grahnen H. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition. A clinical and
hypodontia. Clinical and radiographic diagnosis of genetical investigation. Odont Revy 1956; 7(Suppl 3):1-100.
tooth agenesis in permanent dentition should be made Haselden K, Hobkirk JA, Goodman JR, Jones SP, Hemmings KW.
after the age of 6 excluding the third molar [Pirinen Root resorption in retained deciduous canine and molar teeth
and Thesleff, 1995]. without permanent successors in patients with severe
hypodontia. Int J Paed Dent 2001; 11:171-178.
Kindelan JD, Rysiecki G, Childs WP. Hypodontia: genotype or
Conclusion environment? A case report of monozygotic twins. Br J Orthod
Congenitally missing permanent canines require a 1998;25:175-178.
specific treatment planning. The ability to predict the Leong P, Calache H. Bilateral congenitally missing maxillary
morbidity of retained deciduous teeth, without canines. A case report. Aust Dent J 1999; 44:279-282.
permanent successors would be of considerable value Lum YM, Lim ST. Four cases of congenitally missing permanent
in treatment planning. In this type of therapy many cuspids. Singapore Dental Journal 1976; 2: 49-51.
factors must be considered, the preferences and Muller TP, Hill IN, Peterson AC, Blaynen JR. A survey of
compliance of the patient, the condition of deciduous congenitally missing permanent teeth. J Am Dent Ass 1970;
elements, the number of missing teeth, the patient’s 81:101-107.

40 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY • 1/2007


BILATERAL MAXILLARY CANINES AGENESIS

Nordgarden H, Jensen J, Storhaug K. Reported prevalence of Pirinen S, Arte S. Hypodontia. Orphanet encyclopedia 2004. p.1-7.
congenitally missing teeth in two Norwegian counties. Robertson NRE. Three cases of congenitally missing permanent
Community Dent Health 2002; 19:258-261. cuspids. Dental Digest 1962; 68:68-69.
Peck L, Peck S, Attia Y. Maxillary canine-first premolar Schalk van der Weide Y. Prahl-Anderson B, Bosman F. Tooth
transposition, associated dental anomalies and genetic basis. formation in patients with oligodontia. Angle Orthod 1993;
Angle Orthod 1993; 63:99-109. 63:31-37.
Pirinen S, Thesleff I. Development of the dentition. In : Thilander Sperber GH. Anodontia: two cases of different etiology. Oral Surg
B, Ronning O (eds). Introduction to Orthodontics. Stockholm: Oral Med Oral Pathol 1963; 16:73-82.
Lic Forlag; 1995. p.41-43. Stafne EC, Gibilisco JA. Oral roentgenographic diagnosis.
Pirinen S, Kentala A, Nieminen P, Varilo T, Thesleff I, Arte S. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W. B. Saunders 1975; 16-43.
Recessively inherited lower incisor hypodontia. J Med Genet Suarez BK, Spence MA. The genetics of hypodontia. J Dent Res
2001; 38:551-556. 1974 ; 53:781-785.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY • 1/2007 41

S-ar putea să vă placă și