Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Item
Cost per Km
in Lakhs
Pavement
26.778
CD
12.05
Total
38.828
General Abstract of Cost
1 Sub-Structure 70.81
2 Super-Structure 98.21
Total 191.35
8 Total 4.72
9 G. Total 196.07
Proforma C (For Long Span Brdiges
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA ( PMGSY)
CHECK LIST FOR P.I.U. & S.T.A.
( For Indvidual Bridge works with length more than15 m )
(To be filled by PIU)
5. Name of Proposed Bridge 60.00 mtr span single lane steel trussed motorable bridge on G
Nallah on Kathar to Ponthal road.
(ii) Name of the benefitted Habitation (s) (to be cross Sr.N Name of Village Population
checked with CN-VI) with population 1 KATHAR
2 PONTHAL
Total 0
9. Whether the Road proposal was sanctioned earlier : Yes / No
(i) If Yes, please mention the Phase, MoRD Sanction letter No and Date of sanction
Phase : XIIth MoRD Sanction No.
(ii) Cost of the Road work sanctioned (For Stage-Ist): 1750.46 Lacs
(For Stage-II):
Total:
(iii) Whether any CD/ Causeway was Sanctioned at or nearby location with the road
proposal and whether the same was constructed or not (if yes, the details thereof with chainage: NO
(iv) Whether the roadwork has been completed or in progress and likely date of completion:
(v) If not, How the connectivity and movement of traffic was ensured:
(vi) Reasons for not proposing the Bridge at the time of submission of Road proposal:
Because of Long Span Bridge, the Proposal was not incorporated in Stage-Ist.
Approaches 22.32
Bridge Super
98.21
Structure
Bridge Sub
Structure / 70.81
Foundation
Others 4.72
Total 196.07
MoRD Share- 176.46 Lacs State Share 19.60 Lacs
(MoRD share and State share to be calculated as per the norms of MoRD/NRRDA)
11. INDEX MAP (not to scale ) : Attached
saperately
MDR-42
MSH-6
Kathar
PHOTO
PHOTO
PHOTO (ii) U/
PHOTO
(iii) D/
e. Catchment Area
(Catchment area should be based on hydrological survey or from toposheet)
Catchment area served Hect
Heaviest Rainfall mm/hr.
Basis of Design Discharge
Waterway required Sq.M
Waterway provided Sq.M
Carriage:-
Cement MT 285.91 1.59
Super Structure
M30 in Deck slab, Kerb Cum 114.35 7.83
Carriage:-
Cement MT 85.90 0.47
Stone Masonry Retaining wall 5.0 mtr Ht. Rmt 24.00 9.88
Others 3.87
17. Whether the Bridge has Geometrics as per latest Circular of NRRDA.:
DO.#P-17035/1/2007-Tech. 30th September, 2010.
18. Whether the Cost Etimates are as per standerd data analysis and S.S.R.
19. Sources and the Lead distances of Materials are as under
Lead
Material Source Distance Material Source Lead Distance
(Km)
Earth SAMBA 50 Cement JAMMU 60.00
Counter Signatures of
Co-ordinator STA :
To be filled by State Technical Agency
Name of the STA :
Name of Road : Jogwan To Neeli Nallah
Name of Bridge : 100 Mtr.Span Single Lane Through Truss Girder Motorable Bridge over Kanah Nallah in Km
750 to RD 850
20. Is the proposed work is for CD/Causeway of any length or brigde with span excluding approaches less than 15m.
STAs need not clear such proposals
* Span of bridge: C/C distance along the centre line of the bridge between inner faces of dirt walls.
c. Whether type of foundation & resting strata as per survey report justified to be safe
d. Whether Hydraulic design is checked & found to be adequete as per site requirements
e. Whether RCC designs are checked and found to be economical & safe.
f. Whether the provisions made by PIU are sufficient & essentia from economy point of view.
22 If the Proposal is for a Bridge for which Road was already Sanctioned
If Yes, Have you verified and satisfied yourself with all the items listed at Sr. No. 7, by PIU
Have you satisfied yourself that the road is a part of Core Network
23 Are you satisfied with the following
Engineering Surveys (L section, X sections must be verified)
Soil/ Material Investigation
Hydraulic Studies.
( Catchment for structures to be verified from topo sheet. Location and requirement of structures to be verified from
L section and catchment area to be marked on Topo Sheet Copy )
24 Is the design of the following elements as per relevant I S/ IRC codes
25 Does the Estimation Conform to Standard Rate Analysis and SoR generated for the
current Phase for PMGSY works and a copy of SoR provided to STA
27 Whether STA and Superintendent Engineer have visited the site? If Yes, Date of Visit :
Kindly indicate whether the program of visit was informed to NRRDA for prior approval ?
28 Secific Remarks, if any, by STA
( Specific remarks of STA about the overall Bridge Project are necessary on each DPR)
29. Certificates:
Certified that the proposal of bridge is checked & found to be it is missing bridge on sanctioned roa
the same stretch as it was sanctioend in previous phase under PMGSY.
Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed bridge are based on the latest Circular o
NRRDA:vide DO.letter #P-17035/1/2007-Tech. 30th September, 2010.
Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed bridge are based on the data and SSR pro
PIU Engineers . The Proposal after final Correction is entered on the OMMS.The Propasal may be co
for clearance.
ore than15 m )
Dansal
Ponthal
YES / NO
0 5 5
Population
:
Date
ad
with chainage: NO
In Progress
Cost per m
0.22
0.98
0.71
0.05
1.96
Lacs
ms of MoRD/NRRDA)
Ponthal
t of span- Atttached as
RD 3/935-3/995
RD 3/935-3/995
Open
T/Sqm
ar Span of Vent
r from toposheet)
0.10
Grade of
Cost (in Lacs)
Concrete
6.01
1.19 M-10
33.82 M-30
18.13
1.59
1.70
4.23
0.14
7.83 M30
8.51
1.66
0.23
76.49
0.31
4.00
0.47
0.49
1.23
0.99
2.58
9.88
6.92
1.10
1.84
0.75
3.87
196.07 1.96
% Cost
YES
YES
Lead Distance
60.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
the same stretch as it was
Suprintending Engineer
over Kanah Nallah in Km-4th RD
YES / NO
approaches less than 15m.
Yes/ No
100.00
Mtr.
YES / NO
YES / NO
YES / NO
PIU Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
f structures to be verified from
Wing Walls Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Visit :
Co-ordinator STA:
Signature
Name
60.00 mtr span single lane steel trussed motorable bridge on Gambir Nallah on Kathar
to Ponthal road RD 3/935-3/995
PART-A (Sub-Structure)
Amount (in
S.No Description Lacs)
1
Earth Work in excavation for structure as per Drawing and Technical specification clause
305.1 including setting out construction of shoring and bracing removal of stumps and
other deleterious material and disposal up to a leads of 50 metre. Dressing of sides and
bottoms and back filling in trenches with excavated suitable material.(With Side slope
1H : 2V)
Total 22.32
Total
Grand
Distance (in Total (in Haulage as
Haulage Total
Km) R.s) per
(in R.s)
Distance
Density
Un For
S.No Items Loading For
loading For BT @ Kacha
Gravel @
R.s @ R.s B =
B.T Gravel Kacha Rs. (f
4.49/mt 10.86/m
A = (d+e) 5.40/mt [g+h+i] ) (A+B)
Km t Km
Km
g=ax h =b x i=cx
a b c d e f
4.49 5.40 10.86
1 Sand 50.00 1.50 6.50 50.00 11.00 61.00 1.70 224.5 8.1 70.59 515.42 576.42
Stone
2 50.00 1.50 6.50 100.00 11.00 111.00 2.00 224.5 8.1 70.59 606.38 717.38
Aggregate
3 Stone 60.00 1.50 6.50 100.00 11.00 111.00 1.80 269.4 8.1 70.59 626.56 737.56
4 Cement 60.00 1.50 2.50 127.00 127.00 254.00 1.00 269.4 8.1 27.15 304.65 558.65
5 Steel 60.00 1.50 2.50 138.00 138.00 276.00 1.00 269.4 8.1 27.15 304.65 580.65
6 Bitumen 60.00 1.50 2.50 149.00 135.00 284.00 1.00 269.4 8.1 27.15 304.65 588.65
7 GSB 50.00 1.50 6.50 100.00 11.00 111.00 2.00 224.5 8.1 70.59 606.38 717.38
NP3 1000mm
8 125.00 1.50 2.50 84.00 379.00 463.00 0.88 561.25 8.1 27.15 524.92 987.92
dia. H/P
Total 0.75
BHARAT NIRMAN
Cost Estimate for The Construction of Approach Slab on Both Side
Total 167481.79
7 Carriages
Total 16694.56