Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Leading LifeTree
Leadership Case Study
Chris Payne
Kevin Rodriguez
October 20, 2018
LDRS 801 Theoretical Foundations of Leadership 2
Leading LifeTree
A large church in Northern Ohio (LifeTree) made the decision to move from an
“attractional” model to what is now called a “missional” model. Without digging too far into
detail, this change was a drastic paradigm shift, especially for their technology department.
Almost overnight, the leadership shifted the vision of the church to make its weekend services
less of a production and adopted a “good enough” standard. This meant that monetary and staff
resources would be less focused on the three weekend services they currently offered. The staff
within the technology department felt like they had the rug pulled out from under them. This
team consisted of four staff members who focused on video, audio, editing and stage design.
Once the decision was made by the leadership to lessen the focus on production, the technology
team became a very toxic department. There was almost immediate tension between the on-
stage teams and the technology department. Rehearsals were tense and communication broke
down.
Finally, the campus pastor, Aaron, who handles staffing and team development, came to
the conclusion that the top two technology team leaders needed to be fired due to their attitude
and insubordination. With that firing, many volunteers who did not understand the dynamic also
left because their team leader had been let go. After about 6 months, there were only 2 staff and
7 volunteers for 9 weekly positions that needed to be filled during weekend church services.
Through a friend of a friend, the campus pastor contacted William, who was at the time
leading music at a church in Indiana. Although not having a background in video production and
the mechanics of a mega-church weekend service, he was quite proficient in building teams and
creating a healthy culture that functioned well within the context of a larger environment. After
a few rounds of interviews, the leadership team of LifeTree had found their new tech director in
LDRS 801 Theoretical Foundations of Leadership 3
William. Upon hiring him, however, William was very clear that he was not interested in the
tech director position permanently. He hoped to establish balance and create a healthy
environment within the program to hand off to someone who could take it to the next level in 3
years or so.
William’s role would be to assess the remaining staff, develop their new consolidated
roles and build a team of volunteers who could successfully and competently make the weekend
services operate at the necessary level. At this time, the church would record the Saturday night
preaching and send it to other church campuses throughout the area for use on Sunday morning.
Once in the position, he began to see that things were still not quite right, even after the
firing of the 2 team leaders who had created the negative culture. The remaining 2 team
members, Mike and Kyle, were still making negative remarks about the worship leader and the
pastors in front of volunteers. Unfortunately, they were also uninterested in teaching William
how to edit videos, operate equipment and train new volunteers. To make matters worse, they
would regularly miss production meetings and show up late to work without calling.
William sat down with Mike and Kyle and told them what he expected of them, and if
they did not meet those expectations, they would be let go. Thinking that they held all of the
knowledge and were indispensable, both continued showing up late, bad-mouthing their place of
employment and after completely missing an entire weekend without calling or showing up,
However, William did not simply wait around for them to be fired. He would spend
much of his free time going to the office after hours to practice editing video and learning the
equipment. He also consulted with other professionals in his position at other churches to help
LDRS 801 Theoretical Foundations of Leadership 4
him learn what he needed to know. William soon became proficient in the role, and in a pinch
could perform all of the tasks needed to make a weekend service work.
After the 2 most knowledgeable tech staff members were let go, William then went to a
couple of volunteers and started teaching them how to edit video and run the lighting boards and
other equipment that used to be exclusively the domain of the tech staff members. One of those
volunteers was an older gentleman by the name of Gary. Gary had actually competed with
William for the tech director role and did not get it due to lack of experience in team building.
Gary was an experienced videographer, however, and had an eye for detail. Not only was
he skilled, but he also loved his church. Despite not being hired on staff, he stayed on as a
volunteer to help the person who was hired into the tech director position, which ended up being
William. Gary was also old enough to be William’s father. At first, William was not sure what
As the only tech team person on staff at this church of 4,500 people, William quickly had
to delegate important responsibilities to volunteer team members, many of whom had only been
around less than 6 months. At production meetings William would lay out the structure of the
upcoming weekends, give direction from the creative teams and give general instructions to
William was a visionary leader and could motivate people to stretch themselves, but he
struggled with the details. Often, at production meetings, Gary would ask at least 20 questions
that often frustrated William. William just wanted him to do what he said, but Gary wanted very
specific instructions. After several weeks of aggravation, William finally came to the realization
that Gary processed things differently and just wanted to execute the vision that William laid out
LDRS 801 Theoretical Foundations of Leadership 5
for the team. This was the pivotal moment when William began to understand that Gary was
gifted differently than he was and that he saw potential blind spots that William just did not see.
Shortly after that revelation, William hired Gary to be the video director. Not only did
Gary love the vision that William had for the team, but Gary wanted it to be long-lasting and
effective. While William was excellent at navigating the future and inviting people in to the
team, Gary was equally as gifted in one-on-one conversations, seeing other people’s perspectives
and creating clear lines of communication. William was incredible at bringing people in to the
team, and Gary was just as good at keeping them there and making them feel cared for and
valued.
While the video side of the tech department was growing and fully staffed, William still
struggled to get the audio side on steady ground. Even with a local college that was turning out
audio engineers, they struggled to find one who was a good fit and would help further the
positive culture William was trying to foster. There were plenty of talented engineers, but none
About a year into his tenure at LifeTree, William was given leadership of the tech teams
at their 2 other campuses and tasked with building a tech team that would go and help launch a
new campus about 5 miles up the road. Already understaffed, this seemed like an impossible
task. How would William successfully build up a team that would run a service every weekend
without him being there, when he was not really that great of a technology guy himself?
During a local technology director’s lunch meeting, William met Steve, an audio
engineer at one of the LifeTree campuses. Steve was employed part-time at the campus, and
volunteered with their youth program. He even mentored a couple of the teens in how to run
audio at their campus and they became quite proficient. William pulled him aside after lunch
LDRS 801 Theoretical Foundations of Leadership 6
and asked if he would be interested in coming to the main campus of LifeTree. Steve flatly
rejected the offer, citing his concerns with rumors surrounding the culture within the tech world.
Not to be deterred, William continued to pursue Steve and even invited him to come
experience it with no strings attached. After meeting with William and Gary and being offered
the opportunity to continue to build the culture, Steve finally accepted the offer. Steve was a mix
of skills that complimented both William and Gary’s. Steve was also a bit of a slower learner
and did not catch on to a vision quickly, but when he did, he was fiercely loyal and meticulous
about each step of the process. He was not afraid to disagree with William, but when a decision
was reached, he would not complain nor give less than 100% to make it happen. Steve also
began to find immense value in replacing himself. He trained adults and teens in how to run the
audio for the weekend services and celebrated the volunteers in front of the pastors and worship
leaders.
What he had hoped would take 3 years ended up only taking about 18 months. Without
even an announcement from the stage, William was instrumental in taking the toxic environment
of the technology team from 7 tired volunteers to a team that was almost 40 people strong! He
had hired people who different from himself and created a culture where the team had a voice,
Despite this success, William was dreading the next conversation. He had done what he
had set out to do, and now Gary and Steve were both developing into excellent leaders. William
had taken the team as far as he wanted to and now he did not know what was next. He was
going to have to meet with his campus pastor and tell him he had done what he planned and was
not sure if that meant he may no longer have a job. Unbeknownst to William, however, the
leadership of LifeTree had seen what he had accomplished and were preparing to ask him to go
LDRS 801 Theoretical Foundations of Leadership 7
to one of their oldest campuses and help develop the ministry teams the way he had done with
Discussion Questions:
1. Describe the changes that happened within the the technology team at LifeTree’s main
throughout his time at his position? What caused this development to occur?
3. Discuss the differences in the overall atmosphere within the church both before Aaron
fired the top 2 technology team members, and after William terminated the remaining 2
members. Explain how William’s leadership skills enhanced the new healthier
atmosphere.
4. As William pursued the hiring of Steve, he was met with challenges based on the
reputation of the church resulting in Steve not being interested in joining. What
leadership skills assisted William in changing Steve’s mind? Were there signs of
5. What contributed to William achieving his professional goals in half the amount of time
at LifeTree? Describe any leadership skills present that helped contribute to this success.