Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
inteligenta
17.05.2018 12:22
Casa inteligenta nu mai este de mult doar un scenariu de film sau un moft, iar
implementarea unui sistem smart te poate ajuta sa faci economie la facturi si
sa te bucuri in voie de timpul obtinut cu ajutorul lui.
Case care contin obiecte inteligente - acele case in care exista obiecte
ineligente (in general, electrocasnice si aparate de entertainment);
Este unul dintre cele mai importante atribute ale unei case inteligente pentru
multi dintre noi. Un sistem de securizare incorporat intr-o casa inteligenta
combina senzorii de incendiu cu sistemul de alarma, supravegherea video si
audio si controlul de la distanta al acestora, informandu-te despre existenta
unei posibile probleme, chiar daca te afli la cateva mii de kilometri distanta.
Odata ce sistemul de securitate detecteaza un eveniment necunoscut, iti va
oferi o notificare si posibilitatea de a lua o masura: blocarea usilor, apelarea
la firma de paza sau pornirea unui sistem de stingere a incendiului (daca
senzorii detecteaza fum in locuinta).
Un astfel de sistem iti permite sa controlezi iluminatul din casa, chiar daca
esti sau nu la domiciliu. Principiul de baza al sistemului de control al luminilor
implica un senzor care detecteaza nivelul de lumina din fiecare incapere si
adapteaza becurile inteligente nevoilor fiecarei incaperi, cat si in functie de
anotimp si de ora din zi sau din noapte - se vor aprinde luminile automat in
living atunci cand esti acolo, dar vor fi stinse in dormitor, de exemplu. Un
astfel de sistem iti garanteaza ca nu se pierde inutil energia electrica
aferenta iluminarii.
Sistemul de mentenanta
Exista o multime de obiecte si dispozitive care iti pot face viata mai usoara si
casa mai inteligenta. Mai jos sunt cele mai populare dintre acestea:
European Installation Bus (EIB) este unul dintre cele mai importante
standarde la nivelul Uniunii Europene. Acesta reglementeaza cablurile de
semnal si liniile de alimentare.
În viitor, se estimează că sistemele inteligente care coordonează o casă inteligentă vor comunica
cu proprietarii, le vor anticipa și satisface nevoile. Un exemplu care deja este folosit este
comandarea de alimente sau adăugarea lor pe lista de cumpărături când frigiderul inteligent
comunică faptul că nu mai este un anumit aliment.
Internet of Things (IoT) este conceptul de la baza caselor smart. El presupune folosirea
Internetului pentru a conecta mai multe dispozitive și sisteme care vor forma o rețea de obiecte,
lucru care deja se întâmplă.
Discutăm, așadar, de o realitate palpabilă și nu despre sisteme pe care le-am putea vedea doar
în filmele Science Fiction, și, dincolo de comoditate sau economie de timp, aceste sisteme sunt și
mai prietenoase cu mediul înconjurător.
Sistemele de iluminat inteligente fac în prezent mult mai mult de atât. Un asemenea sistem este
Philips HUE, care conectează, prin bluetooth sau wireless, toate corpurile de iluminat și becurile
din casă la o aplicație pe telefon. Prin această aplicație se poate porni sau opri lumina în casă,
micșora sau crește intensitatea luminii și poate chiar schimba culorile și nuanțele de lumina din
casă, de la distanță.
Becurile HUE se instalează la corpurile de iluminat (lustrele, lămpile, lampadarele) existente în
casă. Aplicația HUE este centrul de comandă al luminilor din casă și permite controlul luminii din
fiecare cameră.
În aplicație găsim fiecare încăpere din casă - Living/Dormitor/Bucătărie - și fiecare bec instalat în
respectiva încăpere. Putem controla, pe încăperi, intensitatea fiecărui bec, putem opta pentru o
setare deja făcută - Arctic Aurora, Savanna Sunset sau putem opta pentru o lumină pentru
concentrare, relaxare sau o lumină de noapte. Desigur, din aplicație putem, de asemenea, să
aprindem și să stingem lumina. Putem, totodată, să mai descărcăm aplicații care să ne permită
sincronizarea luminilor cu muzica sau chiar cu filmele, pentru o experiență completă.
Kit-ul de start Philips Hue cuprinde bridge-ul (un dispozitiv legat la rețeaua wi-fi prin router,
inima sistemului și conexiunea dintre aplicație și becuri) și trei becuri. După ce te obișnuiești cu
tot ce poate face acest starter kit, poți să adaugi și ale becuri, până la 50.
01:23
O cameră de luat vederi inteligentă învață obiceiurile locatarilor, începe să înregistreze doar când
depistează mișcare, moment în care trimite și o notificare pe telefonul mobil și are și un sistem
de recunoaștere a chipurilor pentru a nu trimite alarme false. Totodată, camerele noi sunt și
dotate cu un speaker prin care poți transmite un mesaj de avertizare celor care au intrat în casă
pentru a-i determina să părăsească locuința, dacă nu își doresc să suporte consecințele.
● Electrocasnice smart - Mașina de spălat rufe/vase și frigiderele pot avea sisteme inteligente
integrate care să îți permită să le dai diverse comenzi din aplicația instalată pe tabletă sau pe
telefon.
● Becuri smart - Becurile smart pot fi controlate de pe telefon să furnizeze orice tip de lumină
ne dorim - caldă, rece, de intensitate mare sau mai mică și în orice culoare ne dorim. Ele pot fi
aprinse înainte să intrăm în casă și stinse după ce plecăm și pot de asemenea să „simtă” lumina
zilei și să regleze intensitatea luminii în funcție de ea.
● Prize inteligente - Pot fi controlate de pe telefon sau tabletă atât din rațiuni de siguranță -
oprirea curentului în casă în perioadele în care ești plecat - cât mai ales pentru economisirea de
energie.
● Sisteme de termoficare inteligente - Extrem de utile atât pentru confortul termic, cât și
pentru a eficientiza consumul de energie, sistemele de termoficare inteligente pornesc și se
opresc în funcție de temperatura setată de noi. Într-un fel, sunt cele mai vechi sisteme
inteligente din locuințele noastre pentru că termostatele există (într-o formă mai performantă
sau mai puțin performantă) deja de câteva decenii în locuințe și spații de birouri.
● Kit-uri de automatizare a funcțiilor unei case inteligente - Există mai multe tipuri de kit-uri
smart pentru a avea o casă inteligentă - unele cu prize inteligente, altele bazate pe securitatea
locuinței. Un asemenea kit poate conține contacte magnetic, senzori de mișcare, telecomandă,
cablu Ethernet, adaptor alimentare. Poate fi controlat printr-o aplicație prin care putem seta
intensitatea luminii, intrarea în casă sau poate, datorită senzorilor de mișcare, să avertizeze
proprietarul în cazul unei intrări prin efracție.
Dincolo de aceste aspecte care par evidente, merită să privim avantajele caselor inteligente
dintr-o perspectivă mai adâncă. O casă smart este, în primul rând, una mai sigură. Este,
totodată, și cea care reușește să ne răspundă nevoilor fără ca asta să se traducă în pierderi
inutile de energie.
Sistemele care ne fac locuința mai inteligentă ne permit pur și simplu să ne bucurăm mai mult de
timpul nostru, să ne creăm condițiile perfecte de lucru sau de relaxare (prin controlul luminii, de
pildă) și ne ajută să ne protejăm locuința și pe noi înșine.
Casa inteligenta este de câteva decenii deja o idee cu care fiecare dintre noi cochetează într-un
fel sau altul. Nu mai considerăm de neconceput faptul că putem să pornim mașina de spălat de
la birou sau că putem regla aerul condiționat astfel încât să avem o temperatură plăcută când
ajungem acasă. Totodată, aceste sisteme inteligente devin din ce în ce mai accesibile ca preț,
iar, în curând, ele ar vor deveni cel mai probabil normă, așa cum au devenit de-a lungul timpului
și telefoanele inteligente.
In fact, home automation, an essential part of a smart home, and even the concept
and reality of a smart or intelligent home as such go back to long before the term
Internet of Things was even coined.
Even Z-Wave, a name that will probably ring a bell with people who are familiar with
IoT is over a decade old. And of course everything is IP nowadays as light and room
control (L&RC) and building management system (BMS) expert Jean Commeignes,
who is responsible for the L&RC badge of the EcoXpert certification program of
Schneider Electric, explains in our interview on the evolutions of light and room
control amid the accelerating use of IoT.
You can even go way back further in time to the seventies when the X10 home
automation communication protocol was launched and enabled remote control of,
among others, lamps. It was joined in the eighties by platforms/protocols such as
LonWorks and CEBus (not the same as C-Bus).
You will find some of the many mentioned standards in the high-end
segment of the home automation world, for instance with regards to that
aspect of light and room control which is part of the smart home
automation ecosystem.
Just like home automation and its evolving protocols aren’t new, the
‘vision’ of a smart home as most people see it in this day and age of
connected IoT devices, isn’t really new either.
The example of the connected fridge and all it would be able to do goes back to the
early days of the Internet. In fact, at the end of the nineties these kinds of
connected appliances already existed, albeit in limited ways and not as they look
now.
More importantly, as we’ll see a smart home is not one with a bunch of IoT-
enabled and connected kitchen and other appliances. And smart home
automation is a different thing. However, the notion of the smart home has been
broadening and gradually including appliances on top of longer existing home
automation realities such as temperature control, blind control, energy management
solutions and the mentioned lighting and room control to name a few.
Over a decade ago the term smart house used to be quite popular.
However, the meaning of a smart house wasn’t really defined.
In this 2004 publication, for instance, you see the term smart house used as the
combination of intelligent devices, embedded into the home environment, with a
focus on health monitoring and older people or people with disabilities. Do note that
the idea of remote health monitoring, an important IoT use case in healthcare, goes
back some time as well. For the authors a smart house consisted of several building
blocks, including of course a lot of sensors.
Others spoke about the smart house and indeed sold smart house solutions
in the sense of what you would call a smart home in an IoT context, with on
top of that several home automation controls and functions as they exist
today.
The emphasis needs to be on how the connected home can helps solve
daily tasks rather than just being a novelty collection of devices and apps
(Jessica Ekholm, research director at Gartner)
So, once again overlaps. This was also the case for another term we have been
using long before the smart home; the intelligent home. Synonyms indeed but with
intelligent homes and intelligent buildings we were again more in that dimension of
heating and air conditioning controls, audio and video and so forth. There was also a
Danish company, LK (Lauritz Knudsen), that made a building automation system for
the intelligent home, called IHC which stands for Intelligent House Concept and
is/was sold as a smart house solution by partners and got acquired.
A term that you also may encounters is the connected home. In 2017
research from Gartner on connected home solutions (more below), the firm defined
connected home solutions as follows: “Connected home solutions consist of a set of
devices and services that are connected to each other and to the internet and can
automatically respond to preset rules, be remotely accessed and managed by mobile
apps or a browser, and send alerts or messages to the user(s)”. That’s a nice one
too. Yet, essentially it overlaps with the types of solutions in the more modern sense
of the smart home as we covered it and which is converging with the home
automation sense anyway.
To cut a long story short: many terms for similar and/or overlapping
concepts and quite a bit of history indeed. And then the modern consumer
IoT smart home craze still had to come with all its appliances and platforms
such as Nest and many many others….. Reality? If it’s called smart today,
the Internet of Things is always there.
Yet, in the world of building and home automation, which really brings together
several specializations, not all is black or white – it rarely is in general. So, you
might certainly encounter mini-systems for home automation that are pretty
sophisticated and look more like an integrated small building management system.
Thanks to home automation you can monitor and control the components in and
nearby your home with the infrastructural foundations for a truly smart or connected
home where smart electrical, mechanical and other operation
technologies (OT) meet IT in IoT.
By way of an example that these two terms are distinguished from each other: in
our overview of the main IoT investments per use case according to June 2017 data
from IDC you’ll notice that a de facto distinction is made between smart buildings as
a cross-industry IoT use case which is poised for fast growth ($40 billion in 2017
and, along with connected vehicles predicted to rank among the top segments until
2021) on one hand and the also fast growing investments ($63 billion by 2020) by
consumers in smart home solutions on the other, with spending on smart home
technologies forecasted to grow with a 19.8% CAGR until 2021.
Some will classify a large or even smaller residential multi-family building such as a
big flat building or a smaller apartment building with the necessary connectivity,
capabilities, intelligence and automation as a smart building. That is because such
buildings have shared assets and facilities. Unless you’re really rich or disabled you
probably don’t have a lift in your smart home, for instance. And if you do, it’s not
shared, it’s yours. Some have found the answer by speaking about smart
apartments in such a context of large residential buildings as it separates the
‘private living space’ which a home tends to be from the shared building space.
Let’s make it even a bit more complex before making it easier and tangible
again.
Imagine airconditioning (AC). If you have it, it might be across your entire home or
in one or more rooms. If you have it in your apartment, same scenario. If you live in
a block of apartments one or more shared areas could also have it.
However, it’s not hard to imagine that an HVAC (Heating, Ventilation And
Airconditioning) solution doesn’t look the same in a room, building-wide in a luxury
villa and in the possibly big entry hall – with the elevators – in a multi-family
housing flat complex. Moreover, in the case of flats it uses shared resources such as
the networks, electrical infrastructure and so forth, so with large residential buildings
it’s a bit of a grey zone.
The people who know all about smart metering know electricity but that doesn’t
mean they understand HVAC, which is an entirely different ball game or lighting and
room control, which again is different.
In most homes you won’t find the really high-end solutions though and home
automation is different from your large luxury villa in the tropics. Moreover, the IoT
is playing a converging role. In smart homes. And in smart buildings.
So, can we finally define what a smart home is? Not so fast. The term smart
home is used for the two earlier mentioned, equally converging,
phenomena:
On the other hand and especially since the arrival of the Internet
of Things and its many applications in the sphere of home appliances,
smart meters and IoT consumer devices for the home such as smart TVs,
connected entertainment systems, Internet-enabled appliances and voice-
command systems, the smart home increasingly was seen as an integrated
IoT-enabled living, security, comfort, entertainment and overall home
concept which looks a bit different (no smart fridges in traditional home
automation).
Yet, as said, this too is converging. So, what would be the definition of a smart
home in this context whereby we really move beyond single and often isolated
‘smart home solutions’ (and gadgets) to a somewhat broader perspective?
Home healthcare becomes an important smart home investment segment
as populations age and remote healthcare is poised to increase
A smart home is a house or other form of mainly one-family private buildings which
is either home to the family, serves as vacation home or is rented to other families
for living or holiday purposes, consisting of automated, digitized and connected
home assets, electrical services, controls and appliances across several building and
home components and functions. These run within a communications network and
enable an enhanced monitoring, comfort, energy conservation, maintenance, home
activities and security of its occupants whereby the residents/owners have access to
the resulting services and controls via special displays and controllers, which can
take many forms such as built-in wall displays, proprietary devices, remote controls,
various IT devices such as a computer, tablet or smartphone and/or multiple devices
at the same time.
We haven’t defined a smart building yet, that’s for another article. But by looking at
some of the goals in smart buildings and building management, we can compare
with the smart home. At the end of the day it’s more or less the same but with
different types of buildings (mainly commercial and functional like schools, airports,
hotels, factory plants, hospitals or office buildings but, as mentioned also and
depending on whom you ask, large residential buildings), different technologies and
application areas, different networks, other standards and solutions and goals of
which some are also found in smart homes but which predominantly revolve
around energy efficiency, building and occupant health, productivity and comfort of
residents, asset maintenance, security, regulatory compliance and overall building
health and value (as an asset to its owners).
You immediately see some of the mentioned overlaps and grey zones. Some
examples:
Most of the other aspects in smart building (except perhaps the connected office and
asset maintenance dimensions but you can easily translate those into private
benefits too) are valid for smart homes as well. Comfort, for instance, needs no
further explanation.
Remember that convergence of the traditional home automation and the smart
home in the modern IoT context? Well, in luxury houses, among others, you will find
smart homes with previously mentioned standards such as KNX, still one of the
fastest growers in terms of smart home standards, also outside Europe and China.
If we look at the more recent IoT-related meaning of the smart home, most ‘owners’
de facto have some smart solutions like a smart thermostat (and how smart
is that, really?) , a smart entertainment system, a smart home security
solution and of course a smart meter as governments and utilities roll out
smart meter programs pretty much everywhere. But really few people have
a fully smart and connected home.
The full-fledged smart home is rarely a reality today. A true connected home would
at the very least mean end-to-end interoperability and security, several of the above
mentioned ‘applications’ such as HVAC, light control, room control, some form of
energy consumption monitoring and control, the connection of smart home
appliances and a more or less stabilized market, making that smart home vision
come true.
However, with the Internet of Things existing standards have been joined
by several other standards and communication forms. Just think about the
various evolutions in connectivity standards (short range like Bluetooth 5.0,
Bluetooth Mesh, the next Wi-Fi and long range too for some applications),
proprietary standards in the vendor ecosystems and platforms (the wars of the big
players such as Google and Apple) and the different alliances with home automation
standards (the previously mentioned Z-Wave, ZigBee etc.).
If you look at the – longer existing – high-end of the smart home and home
automation market there is obviously more maturity and these vendors have
solutions that support several of the existing standards such as KNX, as well as IP.
In home automation and building automation, a few standards will remain but IoT
will replace a lot and act as a converging force.
At the lower end and in the pure IoT smart home market it’s still a bit more
of a disconnected mix. Moreover, that segment isn’t necessarily cheap either and
there is a lot of DIY going on there, certainly in an IoT context (HVAC and electrical
work, for instance for connected power, isn’t really fit for DYI and with DYI there are
also DYI risks of course).
Smart home solutions that cover it all are still far too expensive for most
people as Beecham Research stated in its October 2016 smart home report.
A basic light bulb is more than 20 times cheaper than its smarter
counterpart (Olena Kaplan, Senior Analyst at Beecham Research)
The research said that smart homes are overpriced but also undersold and
misunderstood. Although the market of smart home devices is expected to do just
fine, there is a lack of understanding of smart home solutions and what they can
offer. This leads to the focus on practical applications and not enough on the aspects
of new home comforts and easy living.
At the end of 2016 there were ample announcements that will certainly
further boost the IoT smart home space. There is more attention for
security (e.g. the Z-Wave alliance launched a new certification program), there are
innovations in connectivity (e.g., finally Bluetooth 5.0 is there, now the products),
vendors have taken new initiatives (e.g. Google’s Android Things), the list goes on.
However, the devices and solutions are still expensive, there is no open standard
that is 100% safe to connect all the appliances and data. People also don’t trust the
manufacturers and the suppliers enough and there is more fear than before. Despite
all the factors that hold back growth in the market Beecham Research says that the
sales of smart devices for the home will grow with an average of 34 percent to reach
$16.2bn in 2020.
Ease of use, interfaces and a single app do seem logical preferences, certainly if you
are one of the few having various connected home solutions such as connected
home entertainment systems and connected security alarm systems. In total, 55
percent rated 51 or more toward the preference of one integrating app, Gartner
found.
While these insights might help vendors and providers to enhance the attractiveness
of their connected home offerings, Gartner’s Amanda Sabia recommends to push
beyond early adopter use and see what motivates those early adopter users to buy
more solutions.
So, what kind of connected home solutions do customers buy? Some of the
categories of connected home solutions which are most purchased include:
Despite the fact that the real smart home is not there yet, we are using smart home
appliances and specific solutions in specific areas. It could be entertainment, home
security, smart kitchen appliances (a rather popular segment), anything really.
According to April 2017 findings from Zion Market Research, the global smart home
market is expected to reach $53.45 billion by 2022. That’s more cautious than IDC’s
forecasts, yet it’s important to look at the definitions as usual.
For its report, Zion Market Research looks at, among others, following
areas:
Irrigation systems.
Light control has the largest market share in smart homes and convenience, comfort
and security are other key topics as was to be expected.
Here as well energy efficiency (or energy conservation) is seen as a key focus point,
leading to, among others an important role for the comfort and value of HVAC.
Des solutions filaires, qui relient donc le cerveau, ses capteurs, et ses
actionneurs, par des câbles à travers toute la maison. Le KNX en est l’exemple le
plus connu. Autant dire que cela est difficilement envisageable pour beaucoup de
monde, car le passage des câbles dans une habitation existante est une
vraie contrainte. Ce type de solution s’adressera plutôt à des constructions
neuves ou de grosses rénovations. Oublions donc le côté facile, nous ne
partirons pas ici sur ce type de solution.
Heureusement, aujourd’hui il existe de nombreuses solutions sans fil, toutes
aussi fiables, mais nettement plus simples à mettre en œuvre. Cela passe
le plus souvent par une box domotique, semblable à votre box ADSL, mais qui
sera en charge de piloter la maison. Connectée à votre box ADSL, via un câble
réseau ou parfois en wifi, elle permettra de piloter votre maison que vous soyez chez
vous ou non. Peu gourmande en énergie (souvent moins de 5w) et ne
nécessitant aucune maintenance, la box domotique a beaucoup aidé à la
démocratisation de la domotique.
Ensuite, des capteurs, sans fil, le plus souvent alimentés par des piles (mais
parfois sans, comme le EnOcean), sont placés où vous souhaitez dans la maison
pour relever la température, détecter une présence, etc… Leur installation est ainsi
très simple.
Exemple d’un détecteur d’ouverture Nodon, fonctionnant sans fil mais
également sans piles !
Enfin, les actionneurs, qui seront souvent de deux formes : une prise à brancher
entre la prise murale et l’appareil à piloter. Facile à installer par n’importe qui.
Le WallPlug de Fibaro est une prise domotique très esthétique, capable de
piloter un appareil et relever sa consommation électrique.
Ensuite, une fois les solutions trouvées, le choix de sa solution domotique se fera
selon moi sur deux critères que je trouve particulièrement importants.
Tout d’abord, pour bien choisir sa solution domotique, il faut bien choisir le protocole
utilisé. Le protocole domotiqueest le moyen de communication utilisé
entre les périphériques et la centrale, ou box domotique. Même si nous privilégions
ici les périphériques sans fil, plus simples à installer, tous ne parlent pas le même
langage. Z-wave, Zigbee, RTS, ARW, EnOcean, etc… tous ces protocoles sont des
langages différents, qui ne savent pas ou peu communiquer ensemble. Certains de
ces protocoles sont dits « propriétaires », c’est à dire qu’en général ils sont issus
d’un seul fabricant. Ce cas est un double problème : d’une part vous
n’aurez que le choix des périphériquesque veut bien proposer le fabricant;
d’autre part, si le fabricant vient à disparaître, vous ne pourrez plus
acheter de nouveaux périphériques pour compléter votre système. De plus, en
général le fabricant propose dans ce cas sa propre box domotique, qui est la seule à
pouvoir communiquer avec ses périphériques. Certains appellent ça un système
sécurisé, j’appelle cela un système fermé.
A contrario un protocole ouvert dispose de nombreux
fabricants différents, dont les périphériques sont tous compatibles entre
eux, et qui peuvent être utilisés par plusieurs modèles de box domotiques. Le Z-
wave, le Zigbee, l’EnOcean en sont les principaux exemples. Pour toutes ces
technologies, il existe de nombreux fabricants, et de nombreux produits : si l’un
d’entre eux ferme, vous ne retrouverez peut être pas exactement le même
périphérique que celui que vous aviez, mais vous trouverez un équivalent qui fera le
même travail. Ensuite, qui dit protocole ouvert dit compatibilité avec
plusieurs types de box domotiques. Ainsi, il sera possible de choisir une
box qui convient le mieux à vos besoins.
Le Z-wave est l’un des protocole domotique radio les plus utilisés, choisi
par exemple par Orange
Tout ceci pour dire que choisir une box reposant sur le cloud est un choix
risqué à bien des niveaux. Une installation domotique dans une
maison n’est pas là pour 1 an, mais devrait au moins tenir 10 à 20 ans, car elle
devient une partie intégrante de la maison. Il est impossible de dire aujourd’hui si
telle ou telle société sera encore là, et donc si elle assurera le service. Cela est
d’autant plus vrai si la solution en question utilise un protocole propriétaire : dans ce
cas, si la société ferme, votre box domotique devient inopérante, mais l’ensemble de
votre installation également. Là vous aurez perdu de l’argent.
Le problème est à relativiser dans le cas d’un protocole ouvert. Prenons par exemple
la box domotique eedomus, qui est sans doute l’une des meilleures solutions,
reposant certes sur le cloud, mais s’appuyant sur le protocole Z-Wave. Ce n’est
certes pas à souhaiter, mais si la société Connected Object, à l’origine de cette box,
venait à disparaître, que se passerait il ? La box deviendrait inutilisable, car elle
s’appuie sur les serveurs de la société. En revanche, les périphériques Z-Wave,
donc un protocole ouvert, pourraient tout à fait fonctionner avec une autre box. Dans
ce cas il suffirait donc de remplacer la box domotique, la perte ne serait que de deux
cent euros environ (le prix de la box).
Jeedom SMart, une box multiprotocole par excellence, et totalement
autonome de surcroit
Quant aux protocoles propriétaires, certains ont eu la bonne idée de s’ouvrir pour
être utilisables sur de nombreuses solutions domotiques. Même si le protocole est
fermé et qu’il n’y a qu’un seul fabricant, de nombreuses box domotiques savent
dialoguer avec ces périphériques. C’est par exemple le cas des produits Chacon,
réputés pour le prix très abordable.
Pour résumer, je dirai que pour bien choisir sa solution domotique, il faut choisir son
système domotique en priorité dans cet ordre, le dernier choix étant à mon avis à
éviter absolument: