Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on
the World Wide Web at:
http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/85/2/486
www.asas.org
ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present work was concentrations were not different in the stomach of PB
to investigate the in vivo concentrations of sorbic acid and NPB treatments. Pigs fed PB showed a gradual
and vanillin as markers of the fate of organic acids (OA) decrease of the tracer concentrations along the intesti-
and natural identical flavors (NIF) from a microencap- nal tract, whereas pigs fed NPB showed a decline of
sulated mixture and from the same mixture nonmicro- tracer concentration in the cranial jejunum and on-
encapsulated, and the possible consequences on the in- wards, compared with the stomach concentrations. Sor-
testinal microbial fermentation. Fifteen weaned pigs bic acid and vanillin concentrations along the intestinal
were selected from 3 dietary groups and were slaugh- tract were greater (P = 0.02) in pigs fed PB compared
tered at 29.5 ± 0.27 kg of BW. Diets were (1) control;
with pigs fed NPB. Pigs fed PB had lower (P = 0.03)
(2) control supplemented with a blend of OA and NIF
coliforms in the caudal jejunum and the cecum than
microencapsulated with hydrogenated vegetable lipids
pigs fed the control or NPB. Pigs fed the control or PB
(protected blend, PB); and (3) control supplemented
with the same blend of OA and NIF mixed with the had a greater (P = 0.03) lactic acid bacteria plate count
same protective matrix in powdered form but without in the cecum than pigs fed NPB, which showed a reduc-
the active ingredient coating (nonprotected blend, tion (P = 0.02) of lactic acid concentrations and greater
NPB). Stomach, cranial jejunum, caudal jejunum, il- (P = 0.02) pH values in the caudal jejunum. The protec-
eum, cecum, and colon were sampled to determine the tive lipid matrix used for microencapsulation of the
concentrations of sorbic acid and vanillin contained in OA and NIF blend allowed slow-release of both active
the blend and used as tracers. Sorbic acid and vanillin ingredients and prevented the immediate disappear-
were not detectable in pigs fed the control, and their ance of such compounds upon exiting the stomach.
Key words: microencapsulation, natural identical flavor, organic acid, slow-release, swine
©2007 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. J. Anim. Sci. 2007. 85:486–493
doi:10.2527/jas.2006-323
486
sigmoid flexure) were sampled (the contents were dal jejunum, and 2.63 nmol/g of content of ileum, cecum,
drained and collected after excision of each gastrointes- and colon. The recovery for vanillin was 91.1 ± 1.8%.
tinal section) to determine the presence of sorbic acid Ammonia in intestinal contents was measured with
and vanillin in the digesta. Samples from the caudal an enzymatic kit for ammonia analysis (R-Biopharm
jejunum and cecum were used to enumerate lactic acid GmbH Italia, Milan, Italy) after protein precipitation,
bacteria and coliforms, as described below. Samples as described previously, with trichloroacetic acid and
for sorbic acid, vanillin, short chain fatty acids, and centrifugation (8,000 × g) for 10 min at 4°C. Short-chain
ammonia analyses were immediately stored at −20°C; fatty acid and lactic acid concentrations were analyzed
samples for pH determination and microbial counts by gas chromatography (Varian 3400, Varian Analyti-
were immediately processed. cal Instruments, Sunnyvale, CA) using a Carbopack B-
DA/4% CW 2M, 80/120 packed column (Supelco, Sigma
Chemical Analyses of Feed Aldrich s.r.l., Milano, Italy). Before injection, the intes-
and Intestinal Contents tinal contents were centrifuged (6,000 × g for 15 min
at 4°C), and 2 mL of the supernatant were mixed with
Feed composition analyses (DM, ash, and starch; Ta- 1 mL of pivalic acid (98% pure), 1 mL of ossalic acid
ble 1) were performed according to the methods of the (99.8% pure), and 250 L of formic acid (99% pure;
Italian Ministry of Agriculture and Forest (Suppl. 2, Fussel and McCailey, 1987).
1975); CP according to G.U. Series General n. 92
21.04.96; ether extract according directive CEE n. 84/ Bacterial Counts
4/CEE 20.12.83; G.U. CE n. L15 18.01.84; and crude
Serial 10-fold dilutions of 1 g of samples from caudal
fiber according to directive CEE n. 92/89 03.11.92. The
jejunum and cecum were serially diluted and plated
analyses of sorbic acid, vanillin, and short chain fatty
onto Rogosa agar plates for lactic acid bacteria, and
acids concentrations, and pH were performed on the
Violet Red Bile agar (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hamp-
intestinal contents.
shire, UK) plates for coliforms. There were 5 replicates
Sorbic acid was analyzed by HPLC (PU-980, Jasco
per dietary treatment. Rogosa agar plates were incu-
Corp., Tokyo, Japan) using a Lichrospher 100, 5-m,
bated for 48 h at 39°C under anaerobic conditions (H2
RP-C18 column (125 × 4 mm i.d.; Merck & Co. Inc.,
with approximately 4 to 10% CO2; BBL GasPak Plus
Whitehouse Station, NJ), eluted from the column with
Anaerobic System Envelopes, BD, Sparks, MD). Violet
water:methanol (75:25, vol:vol) in 7.4 min, at a flow
Red Bile agar plates were incubated for 24 h at 39°C
rate of 1 mL/min, registering the absorbance at 245 nm
under aerobic conditions.
(UV-1575, Jasco Corp.). Before injection, 50 g of each
gastrointestinal contents were added to 5 mL of trichlo-
Statistical Analyses
roacetic acid (5%, vol:vol), centrifuged (8,000 × g for
10 min at 4°C), and filtered. The filtrate (20 mL) was Data are reported as means ± SEM, and the level
extracted using a steam distillation in a Kjeldahl tube of significance was P < 0.05. Sorbic acid and vanillin
for 12 min after adding 10 mL of HCl (3 mol/L), and concentrations in each gastrointestinal tract of animals
then 1 mL of the distilled portion was filtered through fed PB and NPB were compared by unpaired t-test;
a 0.45-m syringe filter (25 mm, nylon membrane; sorbic and vanillin concentrations among gastrointesti-
Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA). Using an au- nal tracts of pigs within the same dietary treatment
tosampler (AS-1555, Jasco Corp.), samples were in- were compared by 1-way ANOVA. Ammonia and short-
jected into a fixed, 30-L loop for loading into the col- chain fatty acid concentrations, pH, and microbial plate
umn. The limit of detection for sorbic acid was 0.45 counts within the same gastrointestinal site from the
nmol/g of content for the gastrointestinal tracts sam- 3 dietary treatments (control, PB, and NPB) were com-
ples. The recovery for sorbic acid was 96.1 ± 2.4%. pared, and significant differences among treatment
Vanillin was analyzed by HPLC (PU-980, Jasco means were identified by ANOVA. When treatments
Corp.) using a Lichrospher 100, 5-m, RP-C18 column, effects were detected, means were separated using
as described above, and eluted from the column with Newman-Keuls test. Data were analyzed using the pro-
water:acetonitrile (82:18, vol:vol) in 4.8 min, at a flow gram GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software 4.00, San
rate of 1 mL/min, registering the absorbance at 295 nm Diego, CA).
(UV-1575, Jasco Corp.). Before injection, 50 g of the
gastrointestinal contents was added to 5 mL of trichlo- RESULTS
roacetic acid (5%, vol:vol), centrifuged (8,000 × g for 10
min at 4°C), and filtered. Then, 1 mL of the filtrate Animal Health Status
was diluted to 10 mL with distilled water and filtered
through a 0.45-m syringe filter, as described above, No outward clinical conditions were observed during
and analyzed using the autosampler and injection loop study by the veterinarian in charge of animal welfare.
described above. The limit of detection for vanillin was As such, no medical interventions or treatments were
0.66 nmol/g of content of stomach and cranial and cau- performed and no piglets died during the study.
Table 2. pH, ammonia, and molar proportions of short chain fatty acids in gastrointestinal tract samples from pigs
fed the experimental diets
Total
short
chain
Gastrointestinal Acetic Propionic Iso-butyric n-butyric Iso-valeric Valeric Lactic fatty
tract Treatment1 pH Ammonia acid acid acid acid acid acid acid acids2
mol/g of DM
Stomach3 Control 3.61 20.70 0.68 0.01 0.08b 0.01 ND4 ND 5.23 0.78
PB 3.48 16.33 0.65 0.00 0.03a 0.00 ND ND 2.63 0.69
NPB 3.66 15.97 0.84 0.00 0.01a 0.01 ND ND 2.63 0.88
Pooled SEM 0.146 2.719 0.139 0.003 0.013 0.005 ND ND 0.742 0.157
P of the model, < 0.673 0.419 0.917 0.345 0.010 0.446 ND ND 0.068 0.734
Cranial jejunum Control 4.97 34.57 1.23 ND 0.14b ND ND ND 7.33b 1.37
PB 5.15 36.04 2.01 ND 0.06a 0.02 ND ND 4.88ab 2.00
NPB 5.34 35.90 1.72 0.01 0.01a 0.01 ND ND 3.42a 1.84
Pooled SEM 0.257 7.301 0.262 0.001 0.019 ND ND ND 0.792 0.283
P of the model, < 0.320 0.988 0.213 0.001 0.001 ND ND ND 0.021 0.417
Caudal jejunum Control 5.31a 35.59 1.74 ND 0.10 ND ND ND 12.58b 1.76
PB 5.31a 41.81 2.19 0.00 0.08 ND ND ND 15.04b 2.27
NPB 6.10b 32.52 3.36 0.01 0.05 ND ND ND 3.07a 3.22
Pooled SEM 0.195 3.935 0.476 0.007 0.022 ND ND ND 2.420 0.518
P of the model, < 0.022 0.274 0.101 0.457 0.352 ND ND ND 0.019 0.279
Ileum Control 5.44 52.98 1.12a 0.01 0.04 0.01a ND ND 7.20 1.24
PB 5.09 50.96 0.98a 0.01 0.04 0.01a ND ND 8.36 0.98
NPB 6.07 54.14 6.31b 0.04 0.05 0.26b ND ND 4.12 4.96
Pooled SEM 0.310 4.741 0.324 0.017 0.006 0.057 ND ND 1.177 0.820
P of the model, < 0.326 0.893 0.001 0.325 0.764 0.014 ND ND 0.066 0.040
Cecum Control 5.50 26.25 9.94 5.90 0.03 2.43 0.02 0.35a 0.64b 17.12
PB 5.47 28.08 12.39 7.06 0.05 3.66 0.03 0.65b 0.36ab 23.85
NPB 5.27 21.69 13.87 6.83 0.02 3.55 0.03 0.25a 0.15a 24.11
Pooled SEM 0.066 4.733 1.659 0.898 0.016 0.471 0.007 0.083 0.057 2.956
P of the model, < 0.060 0.629 0.278 0.634 0.499 0.166 0.537 0.022 0.007 0.274
Colon Control 5.55 1.28 24.80b 13.72b 0.21b 5.62 0.15b 1.01c 0.22b 45.71b
PB 5.63 3.32 13.61a 7.32a 0.09a 3.90 0.05a 0.61b 0.07ab 25.58ab
NPB 5.51 3.95 12.41a 6.08a 0.08a 3.55 0.05a 0.26a 0.05a 20.07a
Pooled SEM 0.085 1.252 2.698 1.648 0.016 0.640 0.007 0.065 0.024 4.735
P of the model, < 0.596 0.380 0.033 0.015 0.001 0.089 0.001 0.001 0.012 0.018
Within a column, means without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).
a–c
1
Control diet; PB = control diet supplemented with microencapsulated blend of organic acids and natural identical flavors; and NPB =
control diet supplemented with the same blend of organic acids and natural identical flavors with the protective matrix powder but not coating
the active ingredients.
2
Total short chain fatty acids not including lactic acid.
3
Data are shown as means (n = 5).
4
ND indicates not detectable.
tent; pooled SEM = 0.195 cecum: 6.78, vs. 7.58, and 2005), enzymes (Kim et al., 2003), prebiotics (Gibson,
7.99 cfu/g of intestinal content; pooled SEM = 0.24; re- 1998), and probiotics (Klaenhammer, 2000). Efficacy of
spectively). these appears to be associated to the environmental
bacterial challenge. Gastrointestinal epithelial changes
DISCUSSION occurring in piglets at weaning could facilitate digestive
malfunction (Boudry et al., 2004), which is often associ-
The ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in the ated with invasion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
European Union has forced careful consideration of the As consequence, piglets are susceptible to diarrhea (Ky-
fragile equilibrium between the intestinal microbial riakis, 1989). Feed-related measures may alleviate
balance and the fermentability of indigestible feed frac- symptoms of this disease (Melin and Wallgren, 2002).
tions. As quality and availability of feed raw materials Organic acids have been used to control the postwean-
fluctuate, it has become necessary to investigate alter- ing diarrhea and edema disease in piglets (Tsiloyiannis
native methods to modulate the intestinal flora beyond et al., 2001a,b). Likewise, NIF such vanillin, carvacrol,
the stomach barrier. or thymol have been shown to exert antibacterial activ-
Factors that can affect intestinal microbiota include ity in food systems (Burt et al., 2005; Falcone et al.,
OA (Partanen and Mroz, 1999), NIF (Peñalver et al., 2005).
Figure 3. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) microbial plate Figure 4. Coliforms microbial plate counts in (a) caudal
counts in (a) caudal jejunum and (b) cecum. Samples from jejunum and (b) cecum. Samples from pigs fed the control
pigs fed the control diet (white bars), pigs fed the control diet (white bars), pigs fed the control diet supplemented
diet supplemented with a microencapsulated blend of with a microencapsulated blend of organic acids and nat-
organic acids and natural identical flavors (PB, striped ural identical flavors (PB, striped bars), and pigs fed the
bars), and pigs fed the control diet supplemented with control diet supplemented with the same blend of organic
the same blend or organic acids and natural identical acids and natural identical flavors with the protective
flavors with the protective matrix powder but not coating matrix powder but not coating the active ingredients
the active ingredients (NPB, black bars). Data are shown (NPB, black bars). Data are shown as means ± SEM (n =
as means ± SEM (n = 5). a,bIn the same segment of the 5). a,bIn the same segment of the gastrointestinal tract,
gastrointestinal tract, different letters indicate P < 0.05. different letters indicate P < 0.05.
This study showed that sorbic acid and vanillin were still present in small intestine (Piva et al., 1997), where
recovered from the gastrointestinal content without in- chemical and physical factors can degrade the lipid pro-
terfering background materials because they were not tective matrix and consequently the metabolism of the
present in the gastrointestinal fluids of control pigs. released substances occurs. The protective matrix pre-
Analyses of stomach contents showed that sorbic acid vented sorbic acid from being metabolized and allowed
and vanillin had equal concentrations regardless of 15% of the total sorbic acid detected in the stomach
whether they were nonprotected or microencapsulated. content to reach the colon.
Pigs fed PB had no immediate disappearance of sorbic Piva et al. (1997) studied the absorption in gilts of
acid and vanillin as observed for NPB fed pigs after the tryptophan and sulfamethazine in protected and non-
stomach. Conversely, progressively lower concentra- protected form and concluded that the protective matrix
tions of sorbic acid and vanillin were measured in the delayed absorption without affecting total bioavailabil-
cranial and caudal jejunum, likely due to the action of ity. Sorbic acid data in the gastrointestinal content of
digestive enzymes. The digesta 8 to 10 h after meal is pigs fed PB suggested a slow release of the acid from
the capsule. Progressively lower (P < 0.01) fractions of pearance of such compounds upon exiting the stomach.
the stomach sorbic acid concentration were recovered The longer permanence along the gastrointestinal tract
along the gastrointestinal tract (44, 35, 22, 29, and 15% of active compounds allowed them to act synergistically
for cranial jejunum, caudal jejunum, ileum, cecum, and on the intestinal microflora and to reduce coliform
colon, respectively), whereas in pigs fed NPB, sorbic counts.
acid concentration declined immediately after the stom-
ach. Only 2% of sorbic acid in cranial and caudal jeju- LITERATURE CITED
num could be measured, whereas in the subsequent
segments, sorbic acid was not detectable. The lipid ma- Baggot, J. D. 1977. Principles of Drug Disposition in Domestic Ani-
trix also delayed vanillin release as evidenced by 48 mals: The Basis of Veterinary Clinical Pharmacology. Saunders,
Philadelphia, PA.
and 55% of stomach vanillin concentrations (P < 0.05)
Boudry, G., V. Peron, I. Le Huerou-Luron, J. P. Lalles, and B. Seve.
being found in cranial and caudal jejunum, respectively. 2004. Weaning induces both transient and long-lasting modifi-
The increased presence of sorbic acid in gastrointesti- cations of absorptive, secretory, and barrier properties of piglet
nal tract compared with vanillin cannot be associated intestine. J. Nutr. 134:2256–2262.
with a lower water solubility (0.25% at 30°C, wt/vol; Boyle, W. 1955. Spices and essential oils as preservatives. Am. Per-
fumer Essential Oil Rev. 66:25–28.
The Merck Index, 2001) compared with vanillin water
Brul, S., and P. Coote. 1999. Preservative agents in food. Mode of
solubility (1% at 25°C, wt/vol; Vanillin, 2005). Weak action and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Int. J. Food
acids with pKa > 3 (including sorbic acid with pKa of Microbiol. 50:1–17.
4.76) are well absorbed (Baggot, 1977), and the ionized Burt, S. 2004. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and poten-
form of the acid can pass through the intestinal mucosa. tial applications in food—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol.
94:223–253.
Sorbic acid was absorbed at a fast degree in the cranial
Burt, S. A., R. Vlielander, H. P. Haagsman, and E. J. A. Veldhuizen.
jejunum of NPB-fed pigs, whereas the protection matrix 2005. Increase in activity of essential oil components carvacrol
delayed sorbic acid disappearance and allowed it to and thymol against Escherichia coli O157:H7 by addition of food
reach the subsequent intestinal sections with relevant stabilizers. J. Food Prot. 68:919–926.
microbial activity. The antimicrobial role of OA is at- Canibe, N., O. Hojberg, S. Højsgaard, and B. B. Jensen. 2005. Feed
physical form and formic acid addition to the feed affect the
tributable to the capacity of their undissociated form
gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance of growing
to freely diffuse across the semipermeable cell mem- pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1287–1302.
brane of the microorganism into the cytoplasm (Parta- Cosentino, S., C. I. G. Tuberoso, B. Pisano, M. Satta, V. Mascia, E.
nen and Mroz, 1999) where pH is near 7 and weak acids Arzedi, and F. Palmas. 1999. In vitro antimicrobial activity and
dissociate and depress the cellular enzymatic activity chemical composition of Sardinian Thymus essential oils. Lett.
Appl. Microbiol. 29:130–135.
and nutrient transport system (Lueck, 1980).
Falcone, P., B. Speranza, M. A. Del Nobile, M. R. Corbo, and M.
Sofos et al. (1985) reported a reduction of coliforms Sinigaglia. 2005. A study on the antimicrobial activity of thymol
count only in the duodenum of broilers fed diets supple- intended as a natural preservative. J. Food Prot. 68:1664–1670.
mented with sorbic acid (0.04%). In our study similar FDA. 2006. Food and drugs, 21CFR582. http://www.access.gpo.gov/
results were observed in jejunum and cecum of PB-fed cgi-bin/cfrassemble.cgi?title=200221 Accessed Jul. 24, 2006.
Frank, K. 1994. Measures to preserve food and feeds from bacterial
pigs, where the greater concentration of sorbic acid in
damage. UE bersichten zur Tiererna Ehrung 22:149–163.
PB than NPB could explain the lower plate counts of co- Fussel, R. J., and D. V. McCailey. 1987. Determination of volatile fatty
liforms. acids (C2–C5) and lactic acid in silage by gas-chromatography.
Lactic acid bacteria plate counts tended to be reduced Analyst 112:1213–1216.
in the jejunum (P = 0.08) and cecum (P = 0.006) of NPB- Gibson, G. R. 1998. Dietary modulation of the human gut microflora
using prebiotics. Br. J. Nutr. 80(Suppl. 2):209–212.
fed pigs and might have accounted for reduced lactic
Guenther, E. 1948. The Essential Oils. D. Van Nostrand, New
acid concentration and higher pH values in caudal jeju- York, NY.
num of NPB-fed pigs. The same negative pattern was Kim, S. W., D. A. Knabe, K. J. Hong, and R. A. Easter. 2003. Use of
observed by Canibe et al. (2005) when using 18 g/kg of carbohydrases in corn soybean meal-based nursery diets. J.
formic acid in growing pigs. Such disappearance of lac- Anim. Sci. 81:2496–2504.
Klaenhammer, T. R. 2000. Probiotic bacteria: Today and tomorrow.
tic acid production was not observed when pigs were
J. Nutr. 130:415–416.
fed the microencapsulated blend. Kyriakis, S. C. 1989. New aspects of the prevention and/or treatment
We have found no references on synergistic effects of the major stress induced diseases of the early weaned piglet.
of OA and NIF on swine gastrointestinal microflora. Pig News Inf. 2:177–181.
Proposed mechanisms of antibacterial action of NIF Lueck, E. 1980. Antimicrobial Food Additives: Characteristics, Uses,
Effects. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
include their action on the cell membrane (Burt, 2004),
Melin, L., and P. Wallgren. 2002. Aspects on feed related prophylactic
the first barrier that OA encounter before entering the measures aiming to prevent post weaning diarrhoea in pigs.
bacterial cells. The increase in plasma membrane per- Acta Vet. Scand. 43:231–245.
meability due to NIF could help the entrance of OA in Noblet, J., H. Fortune, X. S. Shi, and S. Dubois. 1994. Prediction of
the bacterial cell, where they can alter bacterial metab- net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72(Suppl.
2):344–354.
olism (Brul and Coote, 1999).
Noel, R. J. 2000. Official feed terms. Pages 187–200 in Official Publica-
The protective lipid matrix used for microencapsula- tion. Assoc. Am. Feed Control Officials Inc., West Lafayette, IN.
tion of OA and NIF blend allowed slow-release of the Partanen, K. H., and Z. Mroz. 1999. Organic acids for performance
active ingredients, preventing the immediate disap- enhancement in pig diets. Nutr. Res. Rev. 12:117–145.