0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
23 vizualizări3 pagini
This document contains a rubric for evaluating student groups on a practice about reproduction in plants. The rubric assesses groups on esthetic presentation of samples and albums, oral presentation of results, theoretical explanation of sample characteristics and reproduction types, and solving questions. Groups are scored on a scale of 1 to 5 in each category, with 5 being excellent work and 1 being no work presented. The rubric will be used to provide a final score for evaluated student groups.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating student groups on a practice about reproduction in plants. The rubric assesses groups on esthetic presentation of samples and albums, oral presentation of results, theoretical explanation of sample characteristics and reproduction types, and solving questions. Groups are scored on a scale of 1 to 5 in each category, with 5 being excellent work and 1 being no work presented. The rubric will be used to provide a final score for evaluated student groups.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating student groups on a practice about reproduction in plants. The rubric assesses groups on esthetic presentation of samples and albums, oral presentation of results, theoretical explanation of sample characteristics and reproduction types, and solving questions. Groups are scored on a scale of 1 to 5 in each category, with 5 being excellent work and 1 being no work presented. The rubric will be used to provide a final score for evaluated student groups.
Date: _________________________________ Group: ________________________ Final score: _______________________
CATHEGORY PUNCTUATION OBSERVATION
5: Excellent work 4: Good work but some parts aren’t Esthetic presentation: clear The products of the group (Album and 3: The way they samples) are easy to understand. The way the presented is not group organized the samples and present the esthetic or clear description is esthetic. enough 2: The samples are not well described/ presented. 1: The group do not present their results 5: Excellent work 4: Good work but the way they presented the results is not Oral presentation: creative enough. The group use a creative way to show their 3: Some of the results. All of the members of the group members did not participate actively of the explanation. The participate of the group mention all the characteristics of leaves, explanation. flowers and seeds. 2: the group did not explain all of the categories (leaf, flower, seed). 1: The group do not present their results 5: Excellent work 4: Good work but they did not mention all of the theory worked at class. Theorical explanation: 3: The group barely The group profusely explains the mention some of the characteristics of the samples and the type of things asked. reproduction of the species present in San 2: The group did not Bartolo’s forest. mention anything related to reproduction in plants. 1: The group do not explain anything- 5: Excellent work. All the members of the group participate of the answering part. 4: The most of the Questions solved: members of the The group answers all of the questions made group may answer by the teacher and students. correctly. 3: Just a few members of the group successfully answer the questions made. 2: Just one member of the group answers correctly the questions made. 1: None of the members may answers the questions made.