1|Page

Timeline
Date Event Source: SC/Ans/Exhibit/PO/
2007 The worst harvest before 2014 PO-2, para 32
22 April 2009 Framework Agreement C-1
2010 IBA Rules on Taking evidence in PO-2, para. 59
International Arbitration entered
into force in Equatoriana
The end of 2014 Financial difficulties with ASOC, para. 15
Respondent’s biggest customer
Beginning of 2014 Respondent received numerous SOC, para. 5
awards

Beginning of 2014 Mr. Barolo became CEO of SW ASOC, para 8

January 2014 Negotiations of Respondent with PO-2, para. 20
Mr. Barolo began
30 January 2014 Meeting between Mr. Barolo and PO-2, para. 20
Mr. Weinreich
May 2014 Mr Barolo approached Mr PO-2, para. 21
Weinreich and started more
specific discussions
June-July 2014 Discussions between Mr. Barolo PO-2, para. 21
and Mr. Weinreich
Summer 2014 Claimant made numerous ASOC, para. 9
contracts
Early August 2014 Seemed to be an excellent ASOC, para. 9
harvest
August 2014 Vineexzell overcame its financial PO-2, para. 21
problems
16 August – September 2014 It rained a lot ASOC, para. 9
September 2014 Claimant gets an increase in pre- SOC, para. 5
orders
3 November 2014 Respondent fax informing ASOC, para. 10
customers about extraordinary PO-2, para. 18
drop in quantity, due to a C-3
problem with Claimant’s fax C-5
machine
fax had not been properly
printed out and never reached
the relevant persons
4 November 2014 Claimant ordered from C-2
Respondent 10,000 bottles of
Diamond Mata Weltin
25 November 2014 The meeting, Mr. Weinbauer and C-5
Ms Buharit in Vuachoua, Ms.
 2|Page

Buharit states Claimant’s

intention to make a maximum
order. Respondent remains
somewhat unclear whether they
would be able to comply
25 November 2014 The meeting, Mr. Weinbauer and PO-2, para 22
Mr. Barolo. Mr. Barolo submitted
his offer to buy 15,000 bottles of
Mata Weltin
28 November 2014 Newspaper article in The Wine C-4
Connoseur
November 2014 Respondent firmly promised only
4,500 bottles of Mata Weltin to
Mr. Barolo
1 December 2014 Claimant received a letter from C-3
Respondent stating that it would
deliver 4,500-5,000 bottles of the
ordered wine at a price of EUR
41.50 per bottle
1 December 2014 Mr. Barolo received the notice PO-2, para 22
that 4,500 bottles will be
available
1 December 2014 Newspaper article in Liquor C-4
Retail
2 December 2014 Claimant sent an email to C-6
Respondent requesting the
delivery of 10.000 bottles of
diamond Mata Weltin 2014
2 December 2014 Mr. Barolo called Mr. Weinbauer PO-2, para 22
and accepted the offer for the
4,500 bottles
2 December 2014 Newspaper article in the C-4
Vineyard
December 2014 Claimant suspects that the real C-4
reason for the wine shortage is SOC, para. 7
Respondent’s new agreement
with Super Wines
3 December 2014 Mr. Weinbauer found about ASOC, para. 18
heart operation
4 December 2014 Mr Weinbauer sent email to C-7
Claimant by which he terminated
the contract, no delivery would
be made
5 December 2014 Contingent Fee Agreement C-10
between Claimant and Amadir
Xynsteri of Law Fix
8 December 2014 Claimant sought an interim C-8
 3|Page

injunction in the High Court of

Capital City, Mediterraneo,
prohibiting Respondent from
selling to other customers the
10,000 bottles of diamond Mata
Welding 2014 ordered by
Claimant, by this time, Claimant
already received pre-orders for
6,500 bottles
December 2014 Claimant informed its customers PO-2, para.10
about the interim injunction
12 December 2014 Order of the High Court of C-8
Mediterraneo: granted the
interim injunction, Respondent
refrained from challenging the
order
1 January Mr. Weinbauer retired and his R-1
son-in-law took his position ASOC, para. 18
First week of January 2015 Respondent’s new management ASOC, para. 20
took the first step to resolve the
dispute
14 January 2015 Letter from Respondent to R-2
Claimant, expressing interest for PO-2, para. 54
an amicable solution,
Respondent informed Claimant
that it would initiate
proceedings, Respondent said
that the arbitration clause in the
contract is unclear and therefore
it is void
30 January 2015 Respondent started the court C-9
proceedings before the High
Court of Mediterraneo seeking a
declaration of non-liability
2 February 2015 Claimant visited Vignobilia Ltd PO 2, para. 11
and offered to purchase 5,500
bottles
23 April 2015 Declaration of the Hight Court of C-9
Mediterraneo: dismissed due to
lack of jurisdiction
April/May 2015 Respondent offered to deliver to SOC, para. 14
Claimant 4,500 bottles ASOC, para. 23
25 May 2015 Invoice 1234 Law Fix - Legal C-11
expenses in Kaihari Waina Ltd v.
Vino Veritas Ltd contractual
dispute
8 July 2015 Witness Statement Isme Buharit C-5
 4|Page

8 July 2015 Witness Statement Mrs. Kim Lee C-12

11 July 2015 Statement of Claim SOC
2 August 2015 Witness Statement Mr. Werner R-1
Weinbauer
16 August 2015 Answer to the SOC
1 October 2015 Telephone conference organized PO-1, para. 1
by the AT: the parties agreed PO-2, para 63
that in relation to the arbitration
agreement all questions not
regulated in the Danubian
Arbitration Law are governed by
the CISG
1 October 2015 Telephone conference: the PO-1, para. 2
agreement between the parties
on delivery of 4,500 bottles