Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Wordiness is taking more words than necessary to make your point. It may
take the form of redundant expressions or phrases. To be sure, longer
expressions may be appropriate at times as a matter of style or to avoid
ambiguity. But some business writers clutter their sentences and
paragraphs with words, phrases, and expressions that needlessly distract
the reader.
Consistent elimination of wordiness results in a stronger, more concise
writing style that is easier to read and provides fewer opportunities for
misinterpretation. In contrast, a wordy style makes reading laborious and,
thus, encourages skimming and leads to inattention. Do you wish the reader
to carefully consider your message? If so, reduce wordiness to the extent
possible. The examples below provide guidance for avoiding general forms
of wordiness.
Tax-Related Wordiness
Code section 61
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
credit against tax liability
deduction from gross income
exempt from gross income (or taxation)
in Smith v. U.S.,the court held
in the case of Smith v. U.S.
included in gross income
income which is subject to taxation
Internal Revenue Code
Internal Revenue Service
Regulation §1.101-1
Revenue Ruling 83-24
take (or claim) a credit for
take (or claim) a deduction for
tax deductible
tax exempt
the Smith v. U.S. decision
Treasury Regulation §1.101-1
United StatesBetter Expressions
§61 (or Sec. 61 at beginning of
sentence)
Comm. or CIR
credit
deduction (unless distinguishing between
for and from AGI deductions)
exempt
Smith v. U.S. held
in Smith v. U.S.
gross income
gross income
Code (or omit if part of specific cite)
IRS
Reg. §1.101-1
Rev. Rul. 83-24
credit
deduct
deductible
exempt
Smith v. U.S.
Reg. §1.101-1
U.S.
Wordy Example:In the case of Mais (TC, 1968), the taxpayer was able to
exclude from gross income embezzled funds that were repaid during the year
the funds were embezzled but the taxpayer was not allowed to exclude
embezzled funds to be repaid in a subsequent year.
Edited Example:In the case of Mais (TC, 1968) allowed the taxpayer was
able to to exclude from gross income embezzled funds that were repaid
during the same year the funds were embezzled but the taxpayer was not
allowed to exclude embezzled funds to be those repaid in a subsequent
later year.
Prepositional Strings:Ringo can deduct the $23,000 for the cost of the
pool at the new home as a medical expense.
Ringo can deduct the $23,000 for the cost of the new home s pool at the
new home as a medical expense.
Edited Version:
Better Sentence: Ringo can deduct the $23,000 cost of the new home s pool
as a medical expense.
The sentence reads better after new home is converted into a modifier
for pool.
The word search capabilities in your word processing software can help you
find wordiness in your writing (e.g., searching for the phrase in
order ). Consistent use of this technique can greatly reduce wordiness
and, eventually, can help you recognize wordiness without using your word
processor s search function. In other words, conscientious and consistent
practice can lead to a stronger writing style and reduce the need for
later searching and editing.
After reviewing this lesson, please take the wordiness self-tests. These
tests should help you recognize and correct instances of wordiness in your
own writing.
After reviewing all lessons, please take the comprehensive self tests.
Also, before leaving this website, please remember to complete the short
Exit Questionnaire. Your responses to the questionnaire will help us to
evaluate this site s usefulness and make improvements. Thanks.