Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Stable growth
Figure 1: Mining projects under construction. (Raw Materials Data 2007)
Investments into new mines have in-
creased dramatically and all indicators
point to a continued high level of proj- M USD
Mining trends
Metal shares of total value gold copper iron ore nickel lead zinc PGMs diamonds other
Metal ore of barren rock produced can be calcu- Open pit vs underground
lated as some 10,000 Mt/y. In total, the
Global metal ore production is around amount of rock moved in the metals mi- There was a slow trend in the late 20th
5,000 Mt/y. Open pit mining accounts ning business globally is hence around century towards open pit production.
for some 83% of this, with underground 15,000 Mt/y. The dominance of open pit Two of the most important reasons for
methods producing the remaining 17%. operations stems in terms of the amounts this were as follows:
Barren rock production from under- of rock handled, to a large extent, from
ground operations is small, not exceed- the necessary removal of overburden, Lower ore grades
ing 10% of total ore production, but the which is often drilled and blasted. Due to depletion of the richer ore
barren rock production from open pit By necessity, the open pit operations bodies, the higher-cost underground
operations is significant. are larger than the underground ones. extraction methods are not economic.
Open pits typically have a strip ratio, The map below shows the distribution See the figure below.
the amount of overburden that has to be of metal ore production around the
removed for every tonne of ore, of 2.5. world, and also the split between open New technologies
Based on this assumption, the amount pit and underground tonnages. The more efficient exploitation of lower-
grade deposits using new equipment and
Metal ore production from open pits (green), underground (red). (Raw Materials Data 2005) new processes, such as the hydrometal-
lurgical SX-EW methods for copper
Total 5 000 Mt extraction, has enabled companies to
work with lower ore grades than with
traditional methods.
Europe + Russia
401/188 Mt
898/77 Mt 750/185 Mt
Future
Development of new mining technolo-
244/175 Mt gies is driven by a range of underlying
factors, which affect all stakeholders.
Mines are getting deeper and hotter, and
are now more often located in harsh en-
1319/117 Mt
455/85 Mt
vironments.
Legislation, particularly concerning
open pit underground emissions, and increased demands on
Metals
Underground 850 85 935 3
Open pit 4 130 10 325 14 500 47
Total 4 980 10 410 15 400 50
Industrial minerals
Underground 65 5 70 0
Open pit 535 965 1 500 5
Total 600 970 1 570 5
Sub total 5 600 11 400 17 000 55
Coal
Underground 2 950 575 3 500 12
Open pit 2 900 7 250 10 000 33
Total 5 850 7 825 13 500 45
Overall total 11 450 19 225 30 700 100
Assumptions: 10% waste in underground metal and industrial mineral operations. Strip ratio (overburden/ore) in open
pit metal operations is 2.5. The strip ratio in industrial minerals is 1.8. For coal, underground barren rock is set at 20%, and the strip
ratio in open-pit mines is 2.5. Industrial minerals includes limestone, kaolin, etc. but excludes crushed rock and other construction
materials. Salt, dimensional stones, precious stones are not included. Diamonds are included in metals.
noise and vibration, affect the miners manufacturer promotes new technolo- densely populated countries has further
and equipment operators. Safety de- gies, as does competition from other meant that underground mining is the
mands have already completely changed suppliers. In the early years of the 21st only viable alternative. Such developments
some unit operations, such as rock bolt- century, new efficient underground me- have halted the growth of open pit mi-
ing and scaling. Similar developments thods and equipment have made it ning and it is projected that the pre-
will continue. possible to turn open pit mines that had sent ratio 1:6 underground to open pit
Customers demand higher productiv- become uneconomical because of their mining will continue in the medium
ity, and there is an increasing focus on depth into profitable underground ope- term.
machine availability and simpler service rations. The orebody in these mines is
procedures in order to reduce down- usually steep dipping, and can be mined Magnus Ericsson
time. Reduction of internal development with the most efficient block caving meth- Raw Materials Group
and production costs by the equipment ods. The competition for land in some
2500 2
1.8
2000 1.6
Copper/ore metal
production (mt)
1.4
1500 1.2
1
1000 0.8
0.6
500 0.4
0.2
0 0
1930 1945 1960 1975 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000
Bingham Canyon copper mine near Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.