Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
com/article/view/classic-pawn-structure-part-3a
When a player starts out, he’s told various rules that will help
him navigate through the choppy waters of chess. A few basic
Forza Kinect Sports Set Tournevis
ones are: Motorsport 5 Rivals De Precision
(Exclusiveme.. 32 Pieces Torx
Don’t hang your pieces 33 € . €
46,99 5,90 €
Don’t swallow and talk at the same time GO GO GO
Castle as quickly as possible
Don’t allow your pawns to be doubled
^ Ads keep Chess.com free. Upgrade to remove ads! | Report ^
As time goes by and you start to look at lots of high-level
Articles plus récents
games, you begin to see these gods of chess breaking rule after
rule as if they are allowed to do things that you are not. What gives? Classic Pawn Structure, Part 3a
par MI Silman
The fact is that chess would not be very interesting if you could just follow some basic rules and
Il y a 21 heures
be good. Rules are there to help you take your first chess steps without falling on your face, but
Play "The Reti" in a dynamic way....
once you reach a certain level you should toss the rules in the garbage - if doing so is correct in
par MF Po6Don
that particular position. Il y a 45 heures
One rule that most amateurs cling to is “don’t allow your pawns to be doubled.” In many The Ohio Masters Open
instances that’s a wise rule to follow. Today though, we’ll be exploring a structure that calls for par MF Boorchess
you to double your f-pawns, which appears to leave your king without a home. To make matters Il y a 2 jours
even stranger, all the examples will have Black allowing this to happen to him. Here’s the
structure in question: La famosa partida inmortal
1 par MF jorquerino
Il y a 3 jours
h g f e d c b a
This is the structure you’ll learn to love. But wait! I hear some sort of noise, as if hundreds of ^ Ads keep Chess.com free. Upgrade to remove ads! | Report ^
readers are screaming, “Are you kidding? Why would I go out of my way to destroy my own
kingside? Silman 0, Senility 1.”
The following puzzle will change your mind and turn your loathing to adoration. Oh... wait, it’s
White to move. I guess we will chalk this up to, “If you’re going to make use of this structure,
don’t let this happen to you!”
Puzzle 1:
Okay, okay! That was gruesome! But it doesn’t have to be like this. Really! Since we just looked
at a game from the 1800s, let’s try another from that time period. However, this time I’ll toss
Amos Burn (also known as Mr. Passive) aside and bring in the big guns: Emanuel Lasker!
Why would anyone playing Black want this position? There are several reasons:
Usually White’s kingside knight would have access to the e5-square (Ng1-f3-e5), but the
doubled pawn deprives White’s pieces of both e5 and g5.
In many lines Black’s h8-rook will nudge itself one square to the left and enjoy true
happiness on that open g-file.
Black has two bishops!
At some point Black might play …f6-f5 kicking the e4-knight away and opening the a1-h8
diagonal for Black’s dark-squared bishop.
In many instances Black will turn his “weak” isolated h-pawn into a seek and destroy
missile via ...h7-h5-h4-h3.
In a nutshell, the doubled pawns give Black many dynamic possibilities while also granting him (in
this opening) the long-term advantage of two bishops.
Who wouldn’t love Black’s position? In the rest of the game Lasker proceeded to give away most
of his advantage only to grind his opponent down anyway:
Okay, that particular move order (1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 dxe4 5.Bxf6?! gxf6) doesn’t
offer White anything. But what about 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 dxe4 5.Nxe4 Be7 6.Bxf6
gxf6 when Black’s dark-squared bishop has been dragged to e7, depriving Black of the flexibility
of placing it on g7 in some lines, or after ...f7-f5 allowing the queen to leap to f6 (as in the
Lasker game)?
h g f e d c b a
This was first played by Amos Burn (the guy I cruelly called Mr. Passive), and nowadays it’s
referred to as the Burn Variation. Here’s the initial game:
Now I have to admit something: When I was 14 years old, I gathered as many really old games as I
could (from various books and magazines) and looked through them. I noticed quite a few games
with the Burn Variation and I quickly fell madly in love with it. I played it as often as I could but,
in a fit of insanity, I threw away all my games when I was 19. Not one of my Burn Variation games
survived. I am bringing this up because I want to implore all of you to keep all your games! No
matter how bad they might be, there will be a point in your life when you will want to sit back
and enjoy a trip down memory lane.
So, have many good players used this system? Here’s a list: Rubinstein, Schlechter, Perlis, Reti,
Saemisch, Alekhine, Kmoch Flohr, Bogoljubow, Reshevsky, Lilienthal, Guimard, Bondarevsky,
Boleslavsky, Evans, Koblencs, Minev, Radulov, Botvinnik, Petrosian, Bronstein, Hort, Speelman,
Andersson, Korchnoi, Bareev, Lautier, Anand, Short, Kosten, Kramnik, Atalik, Sakaev, Seirawan,
Chandler, Dreev, Hess, Radjabov, Ivanchuk, Caruana, Shabalov, Topalov, Morozevich, Magnus
Carlsen, and many, many others.
Usually White’s kingside knight would have access to the e5-square (Ng1-f3-e5), but the
double pawn deprives White’s pieces of both e5 and g5.
In many lines Black’s h8-rook will nudge itself one square to the left and enjoy true
happiness on that open g-file.
Black has two bishops!
At some point Black might play …f6-f5 kicking the e4-knight away and opening the a1-h8
diagonal for Black’s dark-squared bishop.
In many instances Black will turn his “weak” isolated h-pawn into a seek and destroy
missile via ...h7-h5-h4-h3.
In a nutshell, the doubled pawns give Black many dynamic possibilities while also granting him (in
this opening) the long-term advantage of two bishops.
Here are some games that will give you a feel for the kind of play that occurs in this structure:
6
b5 11. Bb3 Bxc5 12. dxc5
Bb7 13. Nd4 Qf6 14. Qe2
e5 15. Nf3 Nd7 16. O-O-O
7
Rad8 17. Bd5 c6 18. Bb3
e4 19. Nd4 Nxc5 20. Bc2
8 Rfe8 21. f4 a5 22. Qe3 b4
23. Qg3+ Kf8 24. Qg5 Qxg5
h g f e d c b a
25. fxg5 Nd3+ 26. Bxd3
6
Kovacevic (2549), Serbia
2012. )
7
9... b5 10. Bg2 Bb7 11. O-O
c5 12. dxc5 Bxc5 13. Qxd8+
Kxd8 14. Ne5 Bxg2 15. Kxg2
8
Ke7 16. Rad1 Ra7 17. a4
h g f e d c b a b4 18. Ne2 Rc8 19. b3 Nd7
Note how the same piece setups and plans are employed again and again by Black. When you
know a structure, you will also know where your pieces should go!
At the moment Black (after 7.Nf3) is doing okay with all the main moves: 7...f5, 7...b6, and
7...a6.
But this article is about structure, not about opening theory. And so the following question has to
be addressed: Other than this one line in the French Defense, does this structure appear
anywhere else? Does it have any non-French Defense value? The answer is yes! In Part 3b, we’ll
see it racking up wins in the Caro-Kann, the Sicilian Defense, and in other openings too! In other
words, this is a very important structure and, if you grow to understand it, it will repay you over
and over again in several different opening and middlegame situations.
Commentaires
zekri tota
CJ_P Il y a 10 heures
I went for this structure in the Caro, but my tactical defense is not good enough to play
OBIT Il y a 12 heures
As a chess coach, I often tell my students that, for most chess strategies, the real
answer is "it depends." Are doubled pawns bad? Yes, generally speaking, but it
depends. Is castling a good idea? Most of the time, yes, but it depends. Is a rook better
than a bishop? Usually, but it depends. It depends on the position.
Now, some coaches hate me for making these comments. For one thing, they tell me I
am contradicting the curriculum they follow for their students, which makes them look
bad. They also think the element of ambiguity implied by my comments only confuses
the kids - they need to be given neat and tidy rules to follow, else they'll never learn
this game. It's funny, though... most of the kids I have coached don't have a problem
with the notion that there will be exceptions for most rules. And, the really creative
ones get good at recognizing situations where the rules don't apply.
DMFW Il y a 17 heures
Your comment about knowing when to throw away the rules resonated with me. I think
here, chess is like so many things in life. You need to be drilled in early rules whenever
you enter any new problem domain to stop basic mistakes, you follow them by rote at
first then learn to appreciate exactly why they are there, you continue to treat them as
cast iron but then, maybe, just maybe at some point in the future you are able to take a
step up and see how their support can be kicked away and how you can do new things
perfectly well without the "rules". This could be my epiphany with doubled pawns as I've
well and truly got a rule phobia for them and avoid them like the plague when I
can. This is a very interesting opening. Seems like I need to know when to relax a bit :-)
cdowis75 Il y a 17 heures
In a king only endgame, certain doubled pawn structures will make a blockade by
protecting the diagonal access to the pawns. In a recent game, as we were approaching
an endgame, I deliberately manuevered the opponent into creating this structure.
MI DanielRensch Il y a 18 heures
Does anyone else think Burns looks a little like Georg Meier? No? Just me?
JoeTheV Il y a 19 heures
StevieBlues Il y a 19 heures
A little while ago I wanted to make the switch to 1.e4. After looking into some main
lines, I encountered this variation in stockfish's opening book. It looked so bad for white
i gave up then and there on 1.e4. True story
NeedAPony Il y a 20 heures
I had stumbled into this structure over the board by accident not knowing it was played
let alone that it was given a formal name. While I often fared well in my games I always
feared I had just 'gotten lucky'. Thank you for letting me know how to find examples of
good play with this line. Time to sharpen my chosen tool.
KenyDurant Il y a 20 heures
I recognized it from the sicilian and was glad you covered it. Nice! :)
jtsio Il y a 20 heures
Very interesting article! Thanks again Mr. Silman, you are a true teacher for us!
MF chesskingdreamer Il y a 21 heures
nice article
Haut de la page
Répondre:
Connexion or Rejoindre
Accueil | Pourquoi se joindre à nous | À propos des échecs | À propos | FAQ | Aide et support | Plan du site
Politique de confidentialité | Mentions légales | © 2014 Chess.com • Échecs - Français